Laboratory and clinical evidence of synergistic cytotoxicity of sequential treatment with gemcitabine followed by docetaxel in the treatment of sarcoma.

PURPOSE: A recent report of the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel described favorable results in patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma. The objective of this report is to describe experience with this combination in a variety of histologic subtypes of sarcoma. Additionally, cell-culture studies were performed to assess the effect of the sequence of drug administration on colony formation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A medical record review of 35 patients receiving the gemcitabine/docetaxel combination was undertaken. Gemcitabine 675 mg/m(2) intravenously was administered over 90 minutes on days 1 and 8, and docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) intravenously was administered over 60 minutes on day 8 of a 21-day cycle. Cell culture studies using the SAOS-2 osteosarcoma cell line and MCF-7 breast cancer cell line were also performed. Gemcitabine and docetaxel were added to cells either simultaneously for 24 hours, gemcitabine for 24 hours followed by docetaxel for 24 hours, or the reverse sequence. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were treated. Five complete responses and 10 partial responses were observed for an overall response rate of 43%. Responses occurred in uterine, extremity, and retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma, osteosarcomas, angiosarcomas, malignant fibrous histiocytomas, malignant peripheral-nerve sheath tumors, and Ewing's sarcoma. In the cell culture studies, gemcitabine followed by docetaxel provided synergy. In contrast, the administration of drugs simultaneously resulted in antagonism, and docetaxel followed by gemcitabine provided mixed results. CONCLUSION: The combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel seems to be active in a variety of sarcomas. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial in soft tissue sarcoma comparing gemcitabine alone with this combination, is ongoing.     

Efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine plus docetaxel combination as a second line therapy for patients with advanced stage soft tissue sarcoma

Purpose: To assess the safety and efficacy of a gemcitabine plus docetaxel regimen as a second line therapy for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) resistant to doxorubicin and ifosfamide-based therapy. Patients and Methods: Medical records of 64 patients with advanced STS who received gemcitabine plus docetaxel regimen as a second line treatment between May 2006 and June 2011 were examined. All patients had been previously treated with doxorubicin plus ifosfamide-based regimen at first line setting. Patients received gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 on days one and eight intravenously over 90 minutes, followed by docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day eight intravenously over one hour. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Results: The male-to-female ratio was 37/27 and the median age was 44 years (range; 19-67 years). Objective responses were observed in 13 (20.3 %) patients (2 CR, 11 PR) and stable disease in 21 (32.8 %). Total clinical benefit (CR+PR+SD) was observed in 34 (53.1 %). Median overall survival (OS) was 18 months (95% confidence interval (CI):12.1-23.9) and Median time to progression (TTP) was 4.8 months (95% CI: 3.6-6). A total of 243 cycles of chemotherapy were administered. The median number of cycle was 3 (range;1-11). The most common grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity was neutropenia (35.9 %). The most common nonhematologic toxicities consisted of nausea/vomiting (37.5 %), mucositis (32.8 %), peripheral neuropathy (29.7%), and fatigue (26 %). There was no toxicity-related death. Conclusion: The combination of gemcitabine plus docetaxel is an active and tolerable regimen as a second line therapy for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma who have failed doxorubicin and ifosfamide-based therapy.     

Weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine following docetaxel plus epirubicin or vinorelbine as first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer: results of a multicenter phase II study

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Sequential docetaxel and gemcitabine following initial docetaxel plus epirubicin or vinorelbine association could be worthwhile as first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients entered a phase II study that included two sequential phases. In the first phase, 36 and 22 patients previously unexposed or exposed to adjuvant anthracyclines received the association of docetaxel (75 mg/m2, day 1) with epirubicin (75 mg/m2, day 1) or vinorelbine (20 mg/m2, days 1 and 5), respectively, every 21 days for 4 courses. In the second phase, patients who had a response (R) or stable disease (SD) received docetaxel (35 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (800 mg/m2) on days 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days for 4 courses. RESULTS: In the first phase, grade > or = III neutropenia occurred in 51% and 37% of patients during docetaxel-epirubicin and docetaxel-vinorelbine, respectively. In the second phase, it occurred in the 27% and 15% of patients initially treated with docetaxel-epirubicin and docetaxel-vinorelbine, respectively. On an intention to treat basis, the complete (CR) + partial response (PR) rate to the first phase was 71%, and 22% of patients had SD, without a significant difference between the docetaxel-epirubicin and docetaxel-vinorelbine arms. After the second phase, the CR + PR rate was 65%, and 14% of patients had SD. Median time to progression and survival were 12.1 and 22.0 months, respectively, without a significant difference between patients initially treated with docetaxel-epirubicin and docetaxel-vinorelbine. CONCLUSIONS: Following an initial docetaxel-based treatment, weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine maintains high percentages of R and SD, with improved toxicity. Survival was similar in patients previously untreated and treated with adjuvant anthracyclines.     

健择加泰索帝每周给药治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床研究

目的 观察健择联合泰索帝每周给药治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效，以及两药联合的不良反应。方法 26例经病理学或细胞学确诊的晚期NSCLC患者(初治或复治)接受健择800～1200mg／m^2联合泰索帝35mg／m^2第1、8、15天静脉滴注，每4周重复。2周期以上可评价疗效(包括有效率和中位生存时间)及不良反应。结果 全组CR1例，PR6例，总有效率为27％。其中11例初治患者中5例有效，有效率为45％。中位生存时间9．5个月，1年生存为38％(10／26)。主要不良反应为粒细胞减少及血小板减少。有1例因过敏性休克死己，结论 健择联合泰索帝每周给药治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效与泰索帝三周及四周方案相似，不良反应发乍率明显降低，耐受性较好。     

Gemcitabine and vinorelbine combination chemotherapy for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas: results of a phase II trial

BACKGROUND: Single-agent gemcitabine and vinorelbine have activity in treatment of patients with soft-tissue sarcomas. The combination of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine has activity against several forms of metastatic carcinoma with acceptable toxicity. This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in advanced soft-tissue sarcoma. METHODS: A single academic center performed this phase II trial. Eligible patients had unresectable or metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas, Eastern Cooperative Group performance status of 0-2, adequate organ function, and 4 months. There has been 1 CR lasting >1 year in a patient with high-grade pleomorphic spindle-cell sarcoma. CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine given by a fixed-dose rate of infusion combined with vinorelbine was associated with clinically meaningful rates of disease control in patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma. Toxicity was acceptable. This study contributed to data that have supported the administration of fixed-dose rate gemcitabine-based drug regimens in soft-tissue sarcomas.     

Gemcitabine and docetaxel in metastatic sarcoma: past, present, and future

Objective. In the era of oral molecular kinase inhibitors, cytotoxic chemotherapy agents are somewhat overlooked, but remain the backbone of treatment for most cancers. Patients with non-gastrointestinal stromal tumor sarcomas, such as leiomyosarcoma, liposarcoma, and undifferentiated high-grade pleomorphic sarcoma (formerly called malignant fibrous histiocytoma), have received doxorubicin and ifosfamide as the backbone of their treatment for over 15 years or more. The goal of this article is to review the data that have led to the use of gemcitabine and docetaxel as a useful combination for patients with metastatic sarcomas, and to comment on possible synergy of the combination. Methods and results. The literature regarding the use of gemcitabine, docetaxel, or both, is reviewed, with emphasis on patients with metastatic sarcoma. Results. Activity of gemcitabine and docetaxel is observed in leiomyosarcoma and undifferentiated high-grade pleomorphic sarcoma. There is apparent schedule dependence of the combination in other cancers; it is unclear if schedule matters in patients with sarcomas. The dose and schedule of gemcitabine and docetaxel examined in phase II studies are probably too high for routine practice. Conclusions. The combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel is an effective option for patients with metastatic sarcoma, increasing the armamentarium for the practicing oncologist in treating this heterogeneous group of diseases. Given the low response rate to docetaxel as a single agent, it is likely that there is true clinical synergy of the combination. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.     

Limb salvage surgery for bone and soft tissue sarcoma. A phase II pathologic study of preoperative intraarterial cisplatin.

Preoperative therapy has been tested as part of limb salvage therapy for localized bone and soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities. The activity of cisplatin (CDDP) by intraarterial (IA) infusion was evaluated in 40 cases of which 36 were evaluable for response. All patients had high-grade sarcomas. All but 3 patients received 3 or 4 courses (24 patients received 4 courses) of CDDP at a dosage of 120 to 150 mg/m2 given over 6 hours every 2 weeks by IA infusion. Patients younger than 18 years of age received the higher dose of CDDP. Treatment was well tolerated with combination antiemetics. One patient experienced severe hearing loss with the first cycle of the higher CDDP dose. Pathologic evaluation of resected osteosarcoma showed a favorable response (90% or greater necrosis) in 8 of 20 evaluable cases and in 3 of 4 patients with malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) of bone (without osteoid). In soft tissue sarcomas, minimal (50% to 89%) necrosis was seen in two of nine cases and none had 90% or greater necrosis. Patients received postoperative chemotherapy based on pathologic response, but the value of this postoperative adjuvant therapy requires further follow-up and is uncertain in this small study. IA CDDP can often cause significant tumor necrosis in patients with bone sarcomas, whereas soft tissue sarcomas are less sensitive to this therapy.     

Treatment of Advanced Refractory Sarcomas with Ifosfamide and Etoposide Combination Chemotherapy

Chemotherapy options for resistant advanced-stage sarcomas are limited and in most cases disappointing. In a phase II study, we treated 26 consecutive patients with refractory advanced sarcoma with ifosfamide and etoposide combination chemotherapy. All patients had received prior doxorubicin- and/or cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapies. Seventeen patients were male and 9 were female. The patients' median age was 35 years (range: 19-67 years). A total of 24 patients were eligible for evaluation of responses. Seven patients had a complete response (CR) (29.1%), 3 had a partial response (PR) (12.5%), 3 had stable disease (SD) (12.5%), and 11 had progressive disease (PD) (45.9%). An overall 41.6% objective response was achieved. Median time to treatment failure was 13.3 months. A total of 108 cycles of therapy were evaluable for evaluation of toxicity. Myelosuppression, observed in 55.5% of the treatment courses, was the major dose-limiting toxicity. Nausea and vomiting, seen in 64% of the courses, were the most important nonhematological side effects. Alopecia was almost universal. Hemorrhagic cystitis was observed in only 1 patient. We have concluded that the combination of ifosfamide, mesna, and etoposide is effective in advanced refractory sarcomas, and has acceptable toxicity.     

Docetaxel and gemcitabine combination in 133 advanced soft-tissue sarcomas: a retrospective analysis

Advanced soft-tissue sarcomas are usually resistant to cytotoxic agents such as doxorubicin and ifosfamide. Antitumor activity has been observed for gemcitabine and docetaxel combination. We conducted a retrospective study on 133 patients (58 males/75 females) with unresectable or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma. The median age at diagnosis was 51.7 (18-82), with 76 patients with leiomoyosarcoma and 57 patients with other histological subtypes. The initial localizations were limb (44), uterine (32), retroperitoneal (23) and organs or bone (34). Patients received 900 mg/m2 of gemcitabine (days 1 and 8) over 90 min plus 100 mg/m2 of docetaxel (day 8), intravenously every 21 days. Gemcitabine/docetaxel combination was well tolerated with an overall response of 18.4% and with no clear statistical difference between leiomyosarcomas and other histological subtypes (24.2% versus 10.4% (p=0.06)). No difference was found between uterine soft-tissue sarcomas versus others. The median overall survival was 12.1 months (1-28). Better overall survival was correlated with leiomyosarcoma (p=0.01) and with the quality of the response, even for patients with stable disease (p<10(-4)). No statistical difference was found for the initial localization. Response to treatment and overall survival were better for patients in World Health Organization (WHO) performance status classification (PS) 0 at baseline versus patients in WHO PS-1, 2 or 3 (p=0.023 and p<10(-4), respectively). Gemcitabine/docetaxel combination was tolerable and demonstrated better response and survival for leiomyosarcoma, especially for patients in WHO PS-0 at baseline. For the other histological subtypes, the response was not encouraging, but the survival for patients in response or stable suggests further investigation.     

Bone sarcomas of the head and neck in children: the St Jude Children's Research Hospital experience

BACKGROUND: Bone sarcomas of the head and neck are difficult to resect. The authors reviewed their institutional experience with these tumors to characterize patients' clinical findings and to assess the impact of surgical resection on outcome. METHODS: The records of the 28 patients with bone sarcomas originating in the head and neck treated at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital between March 1962 and January 1998 were reviewed. RESULTS: There were 10 males and 18 females (median age, 12.6 years) each with a single sarcoma: osteosarcoma (18), Ewing sarcoma (7), malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) (2), and fibrosarcoma (1). Primary tumor sites included the maxilla (13), skull (10), mandible (2), and other sites (3). All but one patient with Ewing sarcoma had localized disease at the time of diagnosis. All patients underwent surgery: complete resection, 8; gross total resection, 4; incomplete resection, 14; and biopsy only, 2; 22 also received chemotherapy. Radiotherapy was given to all patients with Ewing sarcoma and to four patients with primary osteosarcoma. Twelve patients survived a median of 8.4 years after diagnosis, 14 died of disease, and 2 died of unrelated causes. Local disease progression was evident in 12 patients (9 with osteosarcoma, 2 with MFH, and 1 with Ewing sarcoma) who died of disease, 9 of whom had the initial treatment of biopsy alone or incomplete resection. Patients with osteosarcoma who had the initial treatment of incomplete resection or biopsy alone were more likely to experience local failure (P = 0.001) and had poorer survival (P = 0.014) than those who underwent complete or gross total resection. CONCLUSIONS: Bone sarcomas of the head and neck are rare among children and most often are localized at the time of diagnosis. Incomplete resection of osteosarcoma is associated with local failure and poor outcome. Although aggressive surgery is essential for the cure of osteosarcoma, its necessity in the treatment of Ewing sarcomas remains controversial.     

吉西他滨联合多西他赛治疗晚期复发转移性骨肉瘤疗效观察

目的：观察吉西他滨联合多西他赛方案治疗晚期复发转移性骨肉瘤的有效性和安全性。方法：收集2010年1月至2014年12月间我院收治的23例一线化疗失败的出现转移的晚期骨肉瘤患者,行多西他赛（75mg／m2,d1,8）联合吉西他滨（1000mg／m2,d1,8）方案行全身化疗,21天为1周期,如达到 PR 及 SD 的患者继续行原方案化疗2周期。采用 RECIST 标准1．0版评价疗效,化疗2周期后评价疗效及毒副反应,3．0版观察毒副反应。结果：23例患者均完成化疗,可评价疗效。完全缓解（CR）0例,部分缓解（PR）3例,疾病稳定（SD）9例,疾病进展（PD）11例;有效率（RR）为13．0％,疾病控制率（DCR）为52．2％,中位无进展生存时间为8．5个月,中位生存时间为16个月,主要毒副反应为限制性骨髓抑制,没有患者出现肾功能不全和过敏反应,2例出现Ⅳ级中性粒细胞减少及 1例出现Ⅳ级白细胞减少。结论：多西他赛联合吉西他滨方案二线治疗晚期复发转移性骨肉瘤疗效肯定,毒副反应可以接受。     

Evaluation of chemotherapy response in pediatric bone sarcomas by [F-18]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography

BACKGROUND: Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a significant prognostic factor for osteosarcoma (OS) and the Ewing sarcoma family of tumors (ESFT). Conventional radiographic imaging does not discriminate between responding and nonresponding osseous tumors. [F-18]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is a noninvasive imaging modality that accurately predicts histopathologic response in patients with various malignancies. To describe the FDG PET imaging characteristics and to determine the correlation between FDG PET imaging and chemotherapy response in children with bone sarcomas, we reviewed our single institution experience. METHODS: Thirty-three pediatric patients with OS or ESFT with osseous primary sites were evaluated by FDG PET. All patients received standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy. FDG PET standard uptake values before (SUV1) and after (SUV2) chemotherapy were analyzed and correlated with chemotherapy response assessed by histopathology in surgically excised tumors. Twenty-six patients had SUV1, SUV2, and surgical excision. RESULTS: Although the mean SUV1 in children with OS or ESFT were similar (8.2. vs. 5.3, P = 0.13), mean SUV2 for OS patients was greater than the values for ESFT patients (3.3 vs. 1.5, P = 0.01). All ESFT patients and 28% of OS patients had a favorable histologic response to chemotherapy (>or= 90% necrosis). Combining ESFT and OS patients, both SUV2 and the ratio of SUV2 to SUV1 (SUV2:SUV1) were correlated with histologic response (P = 0.01 for both comparisons). CONCLUSION: FDG PET evaluation of pediatric bone sarcomas demonstrated significant alteration in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. SUV2 and SUV2:SUV1 correlated with histopathologic assessment of response and potentially could be used as a noninvasive surrogate to predict response in patients.     

Ifosfamide with mesna uroprotection and etoposide: an effective regimen in the treatment of recurrent sarcomas and other tumors of children and young adults

One hundred twenty-four children and young adults with recurrent tumors, predominantly sarcomas, were treated with the combination of ifosfamide, etoposide, and the uroprotector, mesna (2-mercaptoethane sulphonate), in a phase II trial. The treatment regimen consisted of 12 cycles of therapy administered every 3 weeks. After evaluation of the tumor response to chemotherapy alone, radiation or surgery was used to eradicate residual sites of metastatic disease where possible. At the present time, 77 patients are evaluable for response to the chemotherapy; 43 of the patients have experienced a significant reduction in the tumor size in response to the chemotherapy alone (39 partial responses [PR] and four complete responses [CR]). Sixteen of 17 patients with Ewing's sarcoma, nine of 13 with rhabdomyosarcoma, four of eight with peripheral neuroepithelioma, three of eight with osteosarcoma, and 11 of 31 with other tumors have responded with a PR or CR. The toxicity of the regimen was acceptable. Moderate or severe toxicity evaluated on a per cycle basis included: neutropenia, 97%; thrombocytopenia, 32%; nephrotoxicity, less than 1%; mucositis, 1%; neurologic toxicity, 2%; nausea and vomiting, 13%; hemorrhagic cystitis, less than 1%. Fever was present after 33% of cycles and sepsis following 7%. One patient died due to sepsis and pancytopenia. At the present time, only seven of the 43 patients who responded to the chemotherapy regimen have relapsed, with a median follow-up of 10 weeks after the response. This drug combination is highly active in the treatment of recurrent sarcomas and other tumors in children and young adults.     

A New Salvage Regimen for Aggressive Lymphomas Based on Gemcitabine,Rituximab, and Oxaliplatin Followed by Lenalidomide (GROC-Rev)

PurposeTo evaluate the impact of lenalidomide in patients with aggressive lymphoma who experienced less than complete response (CR) or as maintenance therapy after CR after gemcitabine, rituximab, and oxaliplatin salvage chemotherapy (GROC-Rev regimen).Patients and MethodsPatients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma received up to 6 GROC-Rev courses: rituximab (375 mg/m² provided intravenously) on day 1, oxaliplatin (100 mg/m² provided intravenously; 2 hours), gemcitabine (provided 1250 mg/m² intravenously; 30 minutes) on day 2, and pegfilgrastim (6 mg provided subcutaneously) on day 3. Patients switched to lenalidomide if they did not experience at least partial response (PR) after their second GROC-Rev course, or if they experienced less than a CR after 6 courses.ResultsIn 33 patients, overall response was 61% (CR = 39%). Of 17 patients with PR who continued to 6 courses, 10 (59%) experienced CR and 7 PR as maximum response; of these 7, 1 died before receiving lenalidomide, 1 experienced CR while receiving lenalidomide (17%), and 2 experienced a further PR (33%). Of 16 with disease that failed to respond to GROC-Rev after their second course, 2 died before lenalidomide could be administered, and 2 experienced CR (14%) and 1 PR (7%) after lenalidomide. Overall survival and progression-free survival were 47% and 33% at 2 years. Grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and/or anemia (n = 5), neutropenic infection (n = 3), urinary tract infection (n = 3), pneumonia (n = 2), cellulitis (n = 2), and seizure (n = 1). Eight went on to receive transplants.ConclusionGROC-Rev is an effective and well-tolerated salvage regimen consisting of chemotherapy followed by lenalidomide maintenance in patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Simultaneous administration of these agents is worth exploring in future studies.     

Gemcitabine and Docetaxel as a Second-Line Treatment in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas

OBJECTIVE Promising anti-tumor activity in patients with metastatic or unresectable soft tissue sarcomas has been reported with gemcitabine and/or docetaxel.METHODS Forty patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas refractorv to first-line chemotherapv treatment were enrolled.They received:combination of gemcitabine at dose of 900 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and docetaxel at dose of 100 mg/m2 on day 8,and had this regimen repeated every 3 weeks. If the patients had received the Delvic irradiation in advance. aemcitabine dose was reduced to 675 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and docetaxel to 75 mg/m2 on day 8,and had it repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS Gemcitabine/ docetaxel combination was well tolerated by the patients with an overall response of 20%.After median follow-up of 15 months, a median overall survival time was 12 months(95% CI 7.042-16.958)and a median progression free survival time was 6 months(95% CI 5.445-6.545).The most common hematologic toxicity was neutropenia(47.5%)while mucositis was the most common non- hematologic toxicity(45%).The 1-and 2-year survival rates were 50% and 15%,respectively.CONCLUSION This regimen of gemcitabine/docetaxel combination as second-line treatment for the patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas is effective with acceptable toxicities. These results should be evaluated in a large phase III trial.     

Phase I trial of non-cytotoxic suramin as a modulator of docetaxel and gemcitabine therapy in previously treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose

In preclinical models, non-cytotoxic suramin (concentrations <50 μM) potentiates the activity of multiple chemotherapeutic agents. The present study evaluated the safety and tolerability of suramin in combination with docetaxel or gemcitabine in previously chemotherapy-treated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods

Patients received suramin intravenously in combination with either docetaxel on day 1 or gemcitabine on days 1 and 8, of each 21-day treatment cycle. After 3 cycles, patients with partial response (PR) or better continued on the same combination, whereas patients with stable disease (SD) or worse crossed-over to the other combination. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed before and after each treatment.

Results

Eighteen patients received a total of 79 courses (37 suramin plus docetaxel, 42 suramin plus gemcitabine). The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was febrile neutropenia, observed in three of six patients treated with suramin and docetaxel 75 mg/m². No DLTs were observed with suramin plus docetaxel 56 mg/m² or suramin plus gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m². Common adverse events included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, skin rash, hyperglycemia, and electrolyte abnormalities. The target plasma suramin concentration range of 10–50 μM was achieved in 90% of treatments. Discernable antitumor activity was noted in 11 patients (2 PR, 9 SD).

Conclusions

Non-cytotoxic suramin, in combination with docetaxel 56 mg/m² or gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m², was reasonably well-tolerated with a manageable toxicity profile. Target plasma concentrations were correctly predicted by our previously described dosing nomogram. The observed preliminary evidence of antitumor activity encourages evaluation of this strategy in efficacy trials.     

Phase II trial of pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) in sarcoma

Pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil™) is a unique form of liposomal doxorubicin in which the liposomes are coated with methoxypoly (ethylene glycol), resulting in a diminished uptake by the reticuloendothelial system, leading to a longer half-life in blood and a different toxicity profile than nonpegylated liposomes. We performed a phase II study of Doxil in sarcoma. The patient population was primarily previously treated or had diagnoses considered unresponsive to chemotherapy. The initial dose per course was 55 mg/m² every four weeks with dose modification based on mucositis and hand-foot syndrome (the main limiting toxicities). Treatment was generally well tolerated. Of 214 evaluable treatment courses in 47 patients, toxicities were mild and similar to previous reports, but dose reduction was common. No definite cardiac toxicity was observed. There were: 6 osteosarcomas, 3 Ewings, 1 extraosseous osteosarcoma, 1 chondrosarcoma, 2 alveolar soft part sarcomas, 15 gastrointestinal stromal cell tumors (GIST), and 19 other soft tissue sarcomas. Three of the 47 patients received a CR or PR, although 15 of the 47 patients were felt to have derived clinical benefit from the treatment. Some responses were delayed. These data suggest that pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin has activity in this population of poor prognosis sarcoma and that this treatment is associated with modest toxicity.     

Phase I trial of weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine in patients with refractory malignancies

BACKGROUND: A Phase I study using weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine was conducted to investigate toxicity; to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of each agent; and, in a preliminary fashion, to determine the antitumor activity of the combination. METHODS: Docetaxel and gemcitabine were administered intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. The dose levels of docetaxel and gemcitabine were as follows: Level I, docetaxel 20 mg/m(2)and gemcitabine 400 mg/m(2); Level II, docetaxel 30 mg/m(2)and gemcitabine 400 mg/m(2); Level III, docetaxel 30 mg/m(2)and gemcitabine 600 mg/m(2); Level IV, docetaxel 36 mg/m(2)and gemcitabine 600 mg/m(2); and Level V, docetaxel 36 mg/m(2)and gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2). RESULTS: Thirty-three eligible patients were entered. The diagnoses were as follows: Eleven patients had nonsmall cell lung carcinoma, 3 patients had carcinoma of the bladder, 3 patients had renal carcinoma, 2 patients had adrenal carcinoma, 5 patients had unknown primary tumors, and 9 patients had miscellaneous malignancies. Fifty-nine percent of patients had received prior chemotherapy. The median age was 62 years (range, 27-77 years), and the median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 1 (range, 0-1). Five patients were treated at Dose Levels I and II, 6 patients were treated at Dose Levels III and V, and 11 patients were treated at Dose Level IV. Grade 3-4 toxicities during Cycle I included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, mucositis, and diarrhea. Dose-limiting toxicity, consisting of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, occurred in three of six patients at Dose Level V. The combination of docetaxel 36 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 600 mg/m(2) (Dose Level IV) was determined as the MTD and was the recommended Phase II dose. Two patients had a partial response: one patient with bladder carcinoma (Dose Level II) and one patient with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (Dose Level III). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine were well tolerated. Further studies using this combination are planned, including a Phase II trial in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.     

吉西他滨联合顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床研究

目的评价吉西他滨(gemcitabine)联合顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效及毒副反应。方法选择经病理证实的晚期非小细胞肺癌41例住院患者采用GP方案行静脉化疗，具体为Gemcitabine 1250mg/m^2d1、d8，DDP30mg/m^2d1-d3，21天重复，至少使用2周期以上。结果完全缓解(CR)4．9％(2／41)，部分缓解(PR)43．9％(18／41)，稳定(SD)34．1％(14／41)，进展(PD)17．00k，(7／41)，总有效率(RR)48．80%；肿瘤控制率(CR PR SD)为82．19％；中位缓解期7．1m，中位生存期11m(4．5～20m)；毒副反应以白细胞及血小板下降、消化道反应、乏力为常见，均可耐受，无化疗相关死亡。结论吉西他滨联合顺铂对晚期非小细胞肺癌有较好疗效，毒副反应可以耐受，值得临床推广。     

Combination treatment with weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in elderly patients and patients with poor performance status: results of a Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network phase II trial

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of the combination of weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are either elderly or have poor performance status (PS). Patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC who had received no previous chemotherapy and were = 70 years of age were eligible for this clinical trial. Patients < 70 years of age were also eligible if they had poor PS or were considered poor candidates for standard platinum-based combination chemotherapy regimens. All patients received chemotherapy with gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 and docetaxel 30 mg/m2, both drugs administered by 30-minute intravenous infusions on days 1, 8, and 15. Treatment courses were repeated every 28 days. Patients were reevaluated after completion of 2 treatment courses; responding patients continued treatment until disease progression or for a maximum of 6 courses. Between August 1999 and June 2000, 64 patients (73% with stage IV disease) were treated at 17 participating sites in the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network. Eighteen of 64 patients enrolled (28%) had objective response to treatment; an additional 25 patients (39%) had stable disease. Median survival was 7 months, with 1- and 2-year survival rates of 30% and 17%, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated by most patients. Grade 3/4 leukopenia occurred in 7 patients (11%), but no patient required hospitalization for neutropenia/fever. One patient developed fatal bilateral pneumonitis, which was possibly treatment-related. The combination of weekly docetaxel/gemcitabine is active and relatively well tolerated in most patients with advanced age or poor PS with advanced NSCLC. A randomized comparison of this regimen versus single-agent weekly docetaxel is in progress.