Evaluation of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the diagnosis of diaphragmatic injuries

: Injury to the diaphragm from penetrating or blunt thoracoabdominal trauma is notoriously difficult to diagnose. Chest radiography, computed tomography scan, contrast studies, diagnostic peritoneal lavage, and laparoscopy are inadequate; thus, celiotomy is commonly performed in patients with suspected diaphragmatic injury. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with that of exploratory celiotomy in the evaluation of diaphragmatic and thoracoabdominal injury. : Hemodynamically stable patients admitted to a level I trauma center with blunt or penetrating injury to the lower chest or abdomen underwent VATS and subsequent celiotomy under the same general anesthetic. Intraoperative thoracoscopic findings were blinded to the abdominal surgeons. : Twenty-six patients were enrolled in the study over a 12-month period. Diaphragmatic injuries were identified in 8 patients (31%). Videothoracoscopy identified all eight injuries in these patients. Six of the 8 patients (75%) with diaphragmatic injuries sustained associated injury to intrathoracic or intra-abdominal organs. There was no mortality and no procedure-related morbidity. There were no missed injuries in patients who underwent VATS. : Video-assisted thoracoscopy is a safe, expeditious, and accurate method of evaluating the diaphragm in injured patients, and is comparable in diagnostic accuracy to exploratory celiotomy.     

Diaphragmatic injuries: recognition and management in sixty-two patients.

Between 1979 and 1989, 62 patients were treated for traumatic injury of the diaphragm. Forty-five had penetrating injuries following stab wounds or gunshot wounds, and 17 had diaphragmatic tears from motor-vehicle and auto-pedestrian accidents. Forty-one patients sustained left-sided injuries; 20 patients sustained right sided injuries; and one patient sustained bilateral ruptures. All patients underwent exploratory laparotomy and diagnosis was confirmed at surgery. Diaphragmatic injury was suspected in only 17 (27%) patients preoperatively. The chest radiograph showed nonspecific abnormalities in 48 (77%) patients and was diagnostic in 15 (24%) patients. Six patients had diagnostic peritoneal lavage; five were positive and one was negative. Computerized tomography (CT) of the lower thorax and abdomen was performed on 11 (18%) patients, but not one scan was diagnostic. Fluoroscopy in two patients was helpful. All patients had other associated injuries. The liver, spleen, or stomach were frequently injured in association with penetrating diaphragmatic lacerations. Bony fractures, splenic injuries, and head trauma were more commonly found with blunt diaphragmatic ruptures. The average hospital stay for the penetrating injuries was 11 days and for blunt trauma was 16 days. The operative mortalities was 2 per cent for penetrating injuries and 12 per cent for blunt injuries.     

Isolated right diaphragmatic rupture following blunt trauma

Blunt diaphragmatic injuries are usually caused by blunt trauma or penetrating injuries. The diagnosis may be delayed or missed because of the confusing clinical and radiographic findings and the presence of multiple associated injuries. We report the case of an isolated right diaphragm rupture in a 56-year-old man who sustained blunt thoracic trauma after car accident 2 weeks before presentation. No other injuries were detected, and he was subjected to laparotomy. Diaphragmatic rupture is perceived as an emergency entity. The late appearance of such an injury, without other accompanying injuries, is rare and should be in mind by clinicians treating trauma patients who have a delayed presentation after the injury.     

Diaphragmatic injury in children.

Injury to the diaphragm is rare in children. From 1972 to 1990, 13 children were treated for diaphragmatic injury at Ste-Justine and Montreal Children's hospitals. There were seven boys and six girls, ranging in age from 1 to 15 years (average, 7.5 years). Eight patients sustained penetrating trauma and five patients sustained blunt trauma. Nine patients had associated injuries, most commonly involving the liver. All thirteen patients underwent exploratory laparotomy with repair of the diaphragm. There were two deaths, both unrelated to the diaphragmatic trauma. All surviving patients recovered without sequelae. One patient underwent cosmetic repair of a chest wall deformity 9 years after injury. Diaphragmatic injury must be considered in any child suffering blunt or penetrating thoracoabdominal trauma. Because of the increased compliance of the thoracic cage in children, rupture of the diaphragm can occur without signs of external injury. Morbidity and mortality can be minimized by a high index of suspicion, prompt recognition, and surgical repair of even the smallest diaphragmatic injury.     

Traumatic injury to the diaphragm: timely diagnosis and treatment.

Traumatic injury to the diaphragm is a relatively uncommon injury with potential for considerable morbidity if the diagnosis is delayed or missed. This review of cases of traumatic diaphragmatic injury was undertaken in order to emphasize methods and timing of diagnosis and treatment. From 1986 through 1990, 43 cases of traumatic diaphragmatic injury were admitted to the trauma unit at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, for an incidence of 2% of all new multiple trauma admissions. All patients were evaluated and treated by a dedicated trauma team. The left hemidiaphragm was injured in 32 patients, the right hemidiaphragm was injured in eight cases, and the injury was bilateral in three patients. Thirty-four patients had blunt trauma. The mean Injury Severity Score for all patients was 32. The diagnosis of diaphragmatic injury was made radiologically in 21 cases and at surgery in 22 cases. The diagnosis in all cases with penetrating trauma was made at the time of surgery. The interval between injury and definitive surgery was less than 12 hours in 39 of 43 patients. The diagnosis of diaphragmatic injury was delayed by more than 12 hours in only one patient. The other three patients were diagnosed soon after injury but their definitive surgery was delayed for other reasons. Surgical repair of the diaphragm was performed via laparotomy in 40 of 43 cases. Only one patient was repaired in a delayed fashion by thoracotomy for thoracic complications. A clear contrast can be drawn between blunt injuries and penetrating trauma.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The value of laparoscopy in management of abdominal trauma

The role of laparoscopy (LS) in abdominal trauma is controversial. Concerns remain regarding missed injuries and safety. Our objective for this study was to determine the safety and better define the role of LS in abdominal trauma victims. We performed a retrospective review of all patients who sustained abdominal trauma and underwent LS in a level I trauma center. The main outcome measures were age, gender, mechanism of injury (MOI), indication for laparoscopy, presence of intra-abdominal injury (IA), therapeutic laparoscopy (TxLS), need for laparotomy, length of hospital stay (LOS), missed injuries, complications, and deaths. Forty-eight patients underwent LS (62 per cent male; average age, 28 years; MOI, 35 (85%) penetrating, 7 (15%) blunt; mean ISS, 8). At laparoscopy, 58 per cent of patients had no intra-abdominal injury. IA injury was treated with laparotomy in 14 (29%) and TxLS in 6 (13%). One patient had a negative laparotomy (2%). No injuries were missed. No patients required reoperation. There was one complication: a pneumothorax. There were no deaths. LS was most valuable in penetrating trauma, avoiding laparotomy in more than two-thirds of patients with suspected intra-abdominal injury. LS can serve as a useful adjunct for the evaluation of blunt trauma. In a level I trauma center with LS readily available, the procedure is associated with a low rate of complications and missed injury.     

Blunt diaphragmatic rupture: four year’s experience

Background Blunt diaphragmatic rupture (DR) is a rare condition usually masked by multiple associated injuries, which are the main cause of morbidity and mortality. The overall incidence of diaphragmatic injury is 0.8–5.8% in blunt trauma—2.5–5% in blunt abdominal trauma and 1.5% in blunt thoracic trauma. A correct diagnosis remains difficult and is usually made late. Methods Over four years 12 patients with blunt DR were treated in our hospital. Their charts and X-rays were analyzed. All the surgeons involved were interviewed. Diagnostic and treatment modalities were analyzed and discussed. Results Acute diaphragmatic rupture (ADR) was diagnosed in nine patients within seven days. Three patients presented with bowel obstruction and post-traumatic diaphragmatic hernia was diagnosed intraoperatively. Nine patients had rupture of the left hemidiaphragm, two had rupture of the right hemidiaphragm, and one had bilateral DR. Diagnosis of DR was made in all patients in the ADR group before surgery. The correct diagnosis was made within 12 h by junior medical officers in 66.6% of cases. Two patients were diagnosed on a second chest X-ray in response to progressive respiratory distress. The diaphragmatic defect was repaired in all patients via laparotomy; only one patient required additional thoracotomy. Mortality was 25%. Conclusions Single or serial plain chest radiographs with a high index of suspicion are diagnostic in most cases of DR. Respiratory distress should be treated with intubation as intercostal drainage (ICD) may not improve the situation and is associated with a high risk of iatrogenic injuries. Surgical repair is mandatory and laparotomy should be the preferred approach in unstable patients. To avoid missed injury thorough inspection of both hemidiaphragms should be done routinely on every trauma patient undergoing laparotomy. It is widely recommended to use non-absorbable suturing for diaphragm repair but slowly absorbable material seems reliable also.     

Traumatic diaphragmatic hernia: a continuing challenge

Traumatic diaphragmatic hernia is an uncommon but important problem in the patient with multiple injuries. Since diaphragmatic injuries are difficult to diagnose, those that are missed may present with latent symptoms of bowel obstruction and strangulation. From 1957 to 1982, we treated 41 patients with traumatic diaphragmatic hernias. In 39 patients (95%), diaphragmatic hernia followed blunt trauma. The herniation occurred on the right side in 14 patients and on the left side in 29; it was bilateral in 2. Twenty-four patients had diagnostic chest radiographs, and an additional 11 had abnormal but nondiagnostic studies. Peritoneal lavage was of little value in making the preoperative diagnosis. Twenty-three patients underwent laparotomy only, 13 required thoracotomy alone, and 5 had combined laparotomy and thoracotomy. There were 7 deaths (17%) from associated injuries. Only one missed injury was encountered; a second delayed hernia, initially treated elsewhere, was repaired 45 years after the original trauma. Traumatic diaphragmatic hernia should be suspected on the basis of an abnormal chest radiograph in the trauma victim with multiple injuries. Right-sided injuries occur more commonly than previously thought and often require dual incisions (laparotomy and thoracotomy) for diagnosis and treatment. The organization of emergency care for such patients is critical in avoiding the potential of long-term sequelae.     

Occult injuries to the diaphragm: prospective evaluation of laparoscopy in penetrating injuries to the left lower chest

Background: To evaluate the incidence of occult diaphragmatic injuries and investigate the role of laparoscopy in patients with penetrating trauma to the left lower chest who lack indications for exploratory celiotomy other than the potential for a diaphragm injury.

Study Design: Patients with penetrating injuries to the left lower chest who were hemodynamically stable and without indications for a celiotomy were prospectively evaluated with diagnostic laparoscopy to determine the presence of an injury to the left hemidiaphragm. Diagnostic laparoscopy was performed in the operating room under general anesthesia.

Results: One-hundred-ten patients (94 stab wounds, 16 gunshot wounds) were evaluated with laparoscopy. Twenty-six (24%) diaphragmatic injuries were identified (26% for stab wounds and 13% for gunshot wounds). Comparison of patients with diaphragmatic injuries with those without diaphragmatic injuries demonstrated a slightly greater incidence of hemo/pneumothoraces (35% versus 24%, NS). The incidence of diaphragmatic injuries in patients with a normal chest x-ray was 21% versus 31% for patients with a hemo/pneumothorax. An elevated left hemidiaphragm was associated with a diaphragmatic injuries in only 1 of 7 patients (14%). The incidence of diaphragmatic injuries was similar for anterior, lateral, and posterior injuries (22%, 27%, and 22% respectively).

Conclusions: The incidence of occult diaphragmatic injuries in penetrating trauma to the left lower chest is high, 24%. These injuries are associated with a lack of clinical and radiographic findings, and would have been missed had laparoscopy not been performed. Patients with penetrating trauma to the left lower chest who do not have any other indication for a celiotomy should undergo videoscopic evaluation of the left hemidiaphragm to exclude an occult injury.     

A prospective analysis of diagnostic laparoscopy in trauma.

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to assess current and potential future application for laparoscopy (DL) in the diagnosis of penetrating and blunt injuries. Efficacy, safety, and cost analyses were performed. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) and computed tomography (CT) have been the mainstays in recent years for diagnosis of equivocal nontherapeutic laparotomy, whereas CT is not helpful for the vast majority of penetrating wounds. DL may be a useful adjunct to fill in these gaps. METHODS: Hemodynamically stable patients with equivocal evidence of intraabdominal injury were prospectively entered into the protocol. DL was performed under general anesthesia; patients with wounds penetrating the peritoneum or blunt injury with significant organ injury underwent laparotomy. RESULTS: Over 19 months, 182 patients (55% stab, 36% GSW, 9% blunt) were studied. No peritoneal penetration was found at DL in 55% of penetrating wounds with 66% of the remainder having therapeutic laparotomy, 17% nontherapeutic laparotomy, and 17% negative laparotomy. Therapeutic laparotomy was performed in 53% of blunt injuries after DL. Tension pneumothorax occurred in one patient and one had an iatrogenic small bowel injury. Charges for DL were $3,325 per patient compared with $3,320 for a similar group undergoing negative laparotomy before this protocol. CONCLUSIONS: DL is a safe modality for trauma. With current technology, DL is most efficacious for evaluation of equivocal penetrating wounds. Significant cost savings would be gained by performance under local anesthesia. Development of miniaturized optics, bowel clamps, retractors, and stapling devices will reduce overall costs and permit some therapeutic applications for laparoscopy in trauma management.     

Laparoscopy in the evaluation of penetrating thoracoabdominal trauma

The evaluation of penetrating thoracoabdominal trauma for the presence of a diaphragmatic injury presents a diagnostic challenge to the trauma surgeon. The use of diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) in this setting was reviewed at a level-one trauma institution. Eighty patients (71 males, 9 females) with penetrating injuries to the thoracoabdominal region underwent DL to rule out injury to the diaphragm. Fifty-eight patients (72.5%) had a negative study and were spared a celiotomy. In the remaining 22 patients (27.5%), injury to the diaphragm was identified. This subset of patients underwent a mandatory celiotomy to rule out an associated intra-abdominal injury. Seventeen out of 22 (77.2%) patients had a positive exploration requiring surgical intervention, representing an associated intra-abdominal injury rate of 21.2 per cent. Intra-abdominal injuries requiring repair included small bowel, colon, spleen, liver, and stomach, in descending order. There were no missed injuries or deaths. One patient with a left diaphragmatic injury secondary to a stab wound developed a subdiaphragmatic abscess. Respiratory insufficiency secondary to atelectasis was the most common complication. Diagnostic laparoscopy is an essential and safe modality for the evaluation of diaphragmatic injuries in penetrating thoracoabdominal trauma.     

Blunt and penetrating diaphragmatic injuries with or without herniation of organs into the chest

From 1970 to 1984, 189 patients with penetrating injury and 20 with blunt injury were treated at Grady Memorial Hospital. One hundred eight-five patients with penetrating injury (Group 1) and 9 with blunt injury (Group 2) required emergency laparotomy. In the remaining 15 patients (Group 3), the diagnosis of diaphragmatic injury was delayed from 18 hours to 15 years (mean, 8 months) after injury. The vast majority of the Group 1 and all Group 2 patients had injury to other organs, and the diagnosis of the diaphragmatic injury was made in almost all of them during the emergency laparotomy. The diagnosis in Group 3 patients was made by chest roentgenogram alone or with an upper gastrointestinal series or barium enema. All diaphragmatic injuries were repaired primarily except one which was repaired with Prolene mesh. Four of the Group 1 patients died, a mortality of 2.2%, and 2 of the Group 2 patients died, a mortality of 22.2%. All Group 3 patients recovered. This study suggests that diaphragmatic injury should be suspected in all patients with penetrating as well as blunt injury of the chest and abdomen and particularly of the epigastrium and lower chest. The presence of such an injury should be excluded before the termination of the exploratory procedure. Also, diaphragmatic injury should be suspected in patients with roentgenographic abnormalities of the diaphragm or lower lung field following trauma. The presence of diaphragmatic injury in such patients should be excluded with appropriate diagnostic studies to protect the patient from its late complications.     

Diagnostic laparoscopy for the evaluation of occult diaphragmatic injury following penetrating thoracoabdominal trauma

BACKGROUND: Occult diaphragmatic injury following penetrating thoracoabdominal trauma can be difficult to diagnose. Radiographic findings are often non-specific or absent. Undetected injuries may remain clinically silent, only to present later with life-threatening complications associated with diaphragmatic herniation. Diagnostic laparoscopy allows for the evaluation of trauma patients lacking clinical indications for a formal laparotomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of occult diaphragmatic injury and investigate the role of laparoscopy in patients with penetrating thoracoabdominal trauma who lack indications for exploratory laparotomy except the potential for a diaphragmatic injury. METHODS: Haemodynamically stable patients with penetrating thoracoabdominal trauma without indications for laparotomy (haemodynamic instability, evisceration, or peritonitis on exam) and evaluated with diagnostic laparoscopy to determine the presence of a diaphragmatic injury were retrospectively reviewed. Thoracoabdominal wounds were defined as wounds bounded by the nipple line over the anterior and posterior chest superiorly and the costal margin inferiorly. RESULTS: One hundred and eight patients were evaluated for penetrating thoracoabdominal injuries (80 stabs and 28 gunshots) over the study period. 22 (20%) diaphragmatic injuries were identified. These were associated with injuries to the spleen (5), stomach (3) and liver (2). There was a greater incidence of haemopneumothorax (HPTX) in patients with diaphragmatic injury (32%) compared to those without injury (20%). 29% of patients with a HPTX had a diaphragmatic injury. However, 18% of patients with a normal chest radiograph were also found to have a diaphragmatic injury. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of diaphragmatic injury associated with penetrating thoracoabdominal trauma is high. Clinical and radiographic findings can be unreliable for detecting occult diaphragmatic injury. Diagnostic laparoscopy provides a vital tool for detecting occult diaphragmatic injury among patients who have no other indications for formal laparotomy.     

The diagnostic dilemma of diaphragm injury

Prompt diagnosis of acute traumatic injury to the diaphragm remains a challenge when the admission chest X-ray is unrevealing and immediate laparotomy or thoracotomy is not indicated. Diagnostic delay may contribute to significant morbidity and mortality. A retrospective review of our 15-year experience with diaphragm injury (DI) revealed 13 patients (nine male/four female; mean age, 40 +/- 34 years) who sustained injuries to the left (77%) and right (23%) diaphragm respectively as a result of motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) (69%), penetrating trauma (30%), and pedestrian-versus-car accidents (1%). Nine (69%) patients with timely diagnosis of DI underwent laparotomy for suggestive chest X-rays or other indications for immediate exploration. Four (31%) patients sustaining blunt trauma had DI missed on initial evaluation; all patients had initial radiographic evaluations of the chest and abdomen which ascribed abnormalities to intrathoracic pathology. In the one-day delay the diagnosis (right sided) was made at exploratory laparotomy for persistent abdominal pain. This 74-year-old patient, who also had sustained a duodenal injury, succumbed to sepsis. In the 17-day delay the patient had two chest CT scans and multiple bronchoscopies yet failed to wean from the ventilator before exploratory laparotomy which revealed the diagnosis. The third patient sustained multiple injuries after a MVC and underwent multiple imaging studies and back stabilization before discharge. Ten years later, after multiple negative gastrointestinal workups for abdominal pain a contrast study finally diagnosed herniated transverse colon in the left chest. This patient underwent successful repair via laparotomy. The fourth delayed diagnosis was made in a 72-year-old women who had been involved in an MVC 8 years earlier and had sustained multiple back fractures. She is scheduled for exploration in the near future. DI particulary after blunt trauma and on the right side may be missed in the absence of other indications for immediate surgery because radiographic abnormalities of the diaphragm particularly on the right are often attributed to thoracic pathology or may be absent initially. A high index of suspicion for DI may help lead to an earlier diagnosis especially when the patient's clinical condition fails to improve.     

Review of 9 Cases of Diaphragmatic Injury Following Blunt Trauma Chest; 3 Years Experience

Diaphragmatic injuries can occur with both blunt and penetrating trauma which can be associated with herniation of abdominal viscera into the thoracic cavity. Diaphragmatic injuries can occur with blunt trauma chest in 1–7 % of patients. Retrospectively for last 3 years all cases blunt trauma chest admitted to surgery were reviewed and a study of cases of diaphragmatic rupture was done. We analysed 496 patients of blunt trauma chest retrospectively for period of three years. Nine patients have diaphragmatic injuries, all were males, six presented acutely three were chronic. In six patients laparotomy was done, four subcostal and two midline incisions were preferred. In chronic cases thoracotomy was done. Left sided injury predominates and rib fractures are most common associated finding. Diagnosis in majority of cases is made by Computerised tomography scan. Subcostal incision may be used in patients with isolated diaphragmatic injury in acute presentation while thoracotomy is preferred in late cases. Most common morbidity is pulmonary complications     

Traumatic Lesions of the Diaphragm Our Experience in 33 Cases and Review of the Literature

We reviewed 33 consecutive patients with diaphragmatic injuries. Twenty-nine were admitted in emergency conditions after blunt (22 patients) or penetrating injury, presenting shock, dyspnoea, coma or acute abdomen in 21 cases; major associated lesions were found in 23 patients. Four patients presented acute complications of visceral herniation 2, 4, 84 and 216 months after the trauma. The diagnosis was preoperative in 23 cases, intraoperative in 9; in one case it was missed at laparotomy, becoming evident the day after. The sensibility of preoperative chest x-ray and CT was 86% and 100% in presence of visceral herniation, 14% and 0% in absence of visceral hernia. The diaphragmatic repair was always obtained by direct suture, following 20 haemostatic procedures (liver, spleen, mesenterium) and two bowel resections. The mortality rate was 24.4%; the morbidity rate was 48%. Traumatic lesions of the diaphragm are generally expression of particularly severe trauma whose outcome is mainly influenced by the associated lesions. They are also correlated to specific morbidity and mortality, so the surgical exploration is mandatory whenever this injury is suspected, considering that the preoperative diagnosis relies on visceral dislocation. Associated lesions influence the surgical strategy but a direct suture is usually effective in preventing specific complications.     

Sixty-three cases of traumatic injury of the diaphragm

In the examination of patients with severe thoracic and/or abdominal trauma not requiring surgical exploration, special attention should be given to signs of traumatic diaphragmatic herniation (TDH). We analysed the hospital records of 63 patients with traumatic injuries of the diaphragm. Of these patients, 39 had suffered a blunt trauma in a traffic accident, 21 penetrating trauma, and three had fallen from a great height. There were 51 patients (81 per cent) with left-sided diaphragmatic injuries, ten (16 per cent) with right-sided injuries, and in two patients (3 per cent) the injuries to the diaphragm were bilateral. There were 22 patients (35 per cent) who had intrathoracic migration of abdominal viscera. Surgical treatment was given in all cases. Twelve patients (19 per cent) died due to massive haemorrhage, neurological lesions, or septicaemia. Based on the literature and our own experience, we developed a diagnostic protocol for the management of diaphragmatic injuries. Chest radiographs should be made routinely. If diaphragmatic injury is suspected, ultrasound investigation must be performed. If the physician is still in doubt, computed tomography should be performed. At laparotomy, the diaphragm should always be thoroughly examined for lacerations.     

Traumatic lesions of the diaphragm. Our experience in 33 cases and review of the literature

We reviewed 33 consecutive patients with diaphragmatic injuries. Twenty-nine were admitted in emergency conditions after blunt (22 patients) or penetrating injury, presenting shock, dyspnoea, coma or acute abdomen in 21 cases; major associated lesions were found in 23 patients. Four patients presented acute complications of visceral herniation 2, 4, 84 and 216 months after the trauma. The diagnosis was preoperative in 23 cases, intraoperative in 9; in one case it was missed at laparotomy, becoming evident the day after. The sensibility of preoperative chest x-ray and CT was 86% and 100% in presence of visceral herniation, 14% and 0% in absence of visceral hernia. The diaphragmatic repair was always obtained by direct suture, following 20 haemostatic procedures (liver, spleen, mesenterium) and two bowel resections. The mortality rate was 24.4%; the morbidity rate was 48%. Traumatic lesions of the diaphragm are generally expression of particularly severe trauma whose outcome is mainly influenced by the associated lesions. They are also correlated to specific morbidity and mortality, so the surgical exploration is mandatory whenever this injury is suspected, considering that the preoperative diagnosis relies on visceral dislocation. Associated lesions influence the surgical strategy but a direct suture is usually effective in preventing specific complications.     

Diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of rectal trauma. Blunt versus penetrating

In the last 6 years, nine patients with blunt and 16 with penetrating rectal injuries were treated at University Hospital, Jacksonville, Florida. Blunt trauma was caused by vehicular accidents in seven patients and crush injuries in two. Penetrating rectal trauma was due to gunshot wounds in ten patients and foreign body insertion in six. All patients with blunt injury had bright red rectal bleeding, which led to diagnostic sigmoidoscopy. Rectal injury was identified at sigmoidoscopy in 12 patients who had penetrating wounds and at laparotomy in four patients. Thirteen patients who had penetrating rectal trauma had injury to only the rectum or to one additional organ. In contrast, all patients who had blunt rectal trauma had at least three associated injuries. In the penetrating group, 13 patients were treated by colostomy and mucus fistula; three patients with mucosal injury were managed nonoperatively. The only death occurred in a patient whose rectal injury was initially missed. Patients who had blunt rectal trauma were managed with colostomy and mucus fistula. Three patients died postoperatively, two of pelvic bleeding and one of head injury. Hemodynamic stabilization, colostomy and mucus fistula, presacral drainage, and rectal washout constitute proper treatment of patients with blunt or penetrating rectal trauma. Because of the greater number and severity of associated injuries, morbidity and mortality are higher after blunt rectal trauma.     

Traumatic diaphragmatic hernia. Occult marker of serious injury.

OBJECTIVE: Recent experience with traumatic diaphragmatic hernias at the Massachusetts General Hospital was reviewed to identify pitfalls in the diagnosis and treatment of this injury. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Traumatic diaphragmatic disruption is a common injury and a marker of severe trauma. It occurs in 5% of hospitalized automobile accident victims and 10% of victims of penetrating chest trauma. Numerous reports describe splenic rupture in 25% of patients with blunt diaphragmatic rupture, liver lacerations in 25%, pelvic fracture in 40%, and thoracic aortic tears in 5%. Diaphragmatic rupture is a predictor of serious associated injuries which, unfortunately, is itself often occult. METHODS: A chart review of all patients admitted to the Trauma Service with traumatic diaphragmatic hernias was undertaken for the period of January 1982 to June 1992. RESULTS: Data on 68 patients sustaining blunt (n = 25) and penetrating (n = 43) diaphragmatic rupture or laceration were presented. The diagnosis was made preoperatively in only 21 (31%). Associated injuries were frequent in those injured by either blunt or penetrating trauma. Sixty-six patients underwent repair, 54 (82%) through a laparotomy alone and 12 (18%) with the addition of a thoracotomy. There were five (7.4%) deaths that were caused by coagulopathy, hemorrhagic shock, multisystem organ failure, and pulmonary embolism. Complications were twice as frequent in the blunt-trauma group and included abscess, pneumonia, and the sequelae of closed head injuries. CONCLUSIONS: The recognition of diaphragmatic rupture is important because of the frequency and severity of associated injuries. The difficulties in reaching the diagnosis require an aggressive search in patients at risk.