BRCA2, but not BRCA1, mutations account for familial ovarian cancer in Iceland: a population-based study

A single founder mutation in each of the BRCA genes has been identified in Iceland. The frequency of the BRCA1 G5193A and BRCA2 999del5 mutations in all ovarian cancer patients diagnosed over the period 1991–2000 was determined. Mutation status was correlated with family history, tumour morphology and age at diagnosis. Samples from 86% of cases (179 carcinomas and 74 borderline tumours) were available. In the carcinomas, BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were present in 1.2% and 6% of cases, respectively. No BRCA mutations were found in the borderline tumours. Odds Ratio (OR) of developing ovarian cancer was 20.65 for BRCA2 carriers. Family history of breast/ovarian cancer was present for 70% of BRCA2 carriers and approximately 14% for non-carriers with carcinoma. In conclusion, BRCA2 999del5 is present in 6% of ovarian cancer cases in Iceland and is associated with a 20-fold increase in the risk of the disease. The BRCA1 G5193A mutation is too rare to contribute significantly to ovarian cancer in Iceland.     

Reproductive issues for women with BRCA mutations

Women carrying BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations face difficult and confusing reproductive decisions that fall into three categories: issues relating to risk-reducing surgeries, issues relating to use of oral contraceptives/tubal ligation, and issues relating to pregnancy and breastfeeding. Risk-reducing surgeries may confer survival benefits, but they also affect quality of life. Oral contraceptives potentially protect mutation carriers against ovarian cancer but increase the risk of early-onset breast cancer, and evidence for the efficacy of tubal ligation in reducing ovarian cancer risk in BRCA mutation carriers is contradictory. Women with BRCA mutations may increase their risk of breast cancer by becoming pregnant before age 40 years, but breastfeeding may decrease risk of breast cancer in women with BRCA mutations, regardless of age. BRCA mutation carriers desiring to become pregnant must deal with a variety of psychosocial issues, some with significant ethical implications, with minimal guidance from research.     

Reproductive risk factors for ovarian cancer in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations: a case-control study

BACKGROUND: Several of the known risk factors for ovarian cancer are thought to act through their effects on ovulation and the menstrual cycle, such as parity, breastfeeding, and use of oral contraceptives. We aimed to assess the effect of these three risk factors, and of tubal ligation, on the risk of ovarian cancer in women who carry a mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. METHODS: We did a matched case-control study in women who were found to carry a pathogenetic mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Participants were derived from a population-based study of ovarian cancer in Ontario, Canada, and from an international registry of mutation carriers based in Toronto, ON, Canada. All participants completed a written questionnaire that detailed their reproductive history. Women with invasive ovarian cancer and controls were matched on year of birth, country of residence, mutation (BRCA1 or BRCA2), and history of breast cancer. The odds ratios and 95% CI for ovarian cancer were estimated with respect to use of oral contraceptives, parity, breastfeeding, and tubal ligation. FINDINGS: Questionnaires were completed by 799 women with a history of invasive ovarian cancer (670 with BRCA1 mutations, 128 with BRCA2 mutations, and one with a mutation in both genes), and controls were 2424 women without ovarian cancer (2043 with BRCA1 mutations, 380 with BRCA2 mutations, and one with a mutation in both genes). Use of oral contraceptives reduced the risk of ovarian cancer in carriers of BRCA1 mutations (odds ratio 0.56 [95% CI 0.45-0.71]; p<0.0001) and carriers of BRCA2 mutations (0.39 [0.23-0.66]; p=0.0004). Parity was associated with a reduced risk for carriers of BRCA1 mutations (0.67 [0.46-0.96]; p=0.03), but with an increased risk for those with BRCA2 mutations (2.74 [1.18-6.41]; p=0.02). Breastfeeding was associated with a reduced risk for carriers of BRCA1 mutations (0.74 [0.56-0.97]; p=0.03). An effect of similar magnitude was seen for carriers of BRCA2 mutations (0.72 [0.41-1.29]; p=0.27), but this was not statistically significant. The association with tubal ligation was not significant for carriers of BRCA1 mutations (0.80 [0.59-1.08]; p=0.15), or for carriers of BRCA2 mutations (0.63 [0.34-1.15]; p=0.13). INTERPRETATION: Oral contraceptives could be used as a means to prevent ovarian cancer in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. The possible adverse effect of parity on ovarian-cancer risk in women with a BRCA2 mutation needs further study.     

Histopathological characteristics of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated intraperitoneal cancer: a clinic-based study

The aim of the research was to assess possible histopathological differences between BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated malignant intraperitoneal (ovarian/fallopian tube/peritoneal) tumors and their sporadic counterparts. Dutch families harboring pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations were selected. Included were patients who had had malignant primary ovarian, fallopian tube or peritoneal tumors. Histopathological data was compared with data obtained from the Dutch cancer registry between 1989 and 1993 (reference group). A total of 63 with primary intraperitoneal malignant tumors were identified in 41 families. Non-epithelial malignant tumors were not observed in the study group versus 6% (n = 404) in the reference group (n = 6,789, P = 0.04). These tumors were excluded from further analysis, as were ovarian adenocarcinomas not otherwise specified, since these were detected in 22% of the study group, and in 19% of the reference group (P = 0.76). Serous carcinomas were detected in 94% (47/50) of the women in the study group in contrast to 62% (3,145/5,088) of the reference group (P < 0.01). In the study group, mucinous and endometrioid ovarian adenocarcinomas and serous ovarian borderline tumors each comprised 2.0% of the tumors. Clear cell ovarian carcinomas were not detected. In contrast, these percentages were 16% (P < 0.01), 10% (P = 0.07), 7% (P = 0.16) and 5% (P = 0.12), respectively, in the reference group. In the study group, 6.0% of the carcinomas arose in the fallopian tube versus 1.9% in the reference group (P = 0.03). Four percent of the study group developed primary serous peritoneal carcinomas, versus six percent in the reference group (P = 0.57). Serous carcinoma is the predominant type of intraperitoneal malignancy occurring in women harboring BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Non-epithelial cancer does not seem to be part of the tumor spectrum of BRCA mutation carriers. This suggests, therefore, that serous tumors may be the only subtype related to a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Furthermore, fallopian tube carcinoma occurred more often in BRCA mutation carriers than in the reference population. This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

BRCA1 4153delA founder mutation in Russian ovarian cancer patients

The BRCA1 4153delA allele is frequently referred to as the Russian founder mutation, as it was initially detected in several cancer families from Moscow. Our earlier studies have demonstrated 1% occurrence of BRCA1 4153delA heterozygosity in familial and/or early-onset and/or bilateral Russian breast cancer (BC) patients. Since literature data suggest that the 4153delA variant is more associated with ovarian cancer (OC) than with BC, we expected to reveal a highly elevated frequency of this genotype in Russian ovarian cancer series. However, real-time allele-specific PCR genotyping has detected only two BRCA1 4153delA carriers out of 177 unselected OC patients (1.1%). Both these carriers were early-onset and had serous carcinomas of grade 3. Thus, our study supports neither the Russian origin of BRCA1 4153delA mutation, nor its selectivity towards ovarian versus breast cancer predisposition.     

Improved survival in BRCA2 carriers with ovarian cancer

Objectives The objective of this study was to investigate survival of ovarian cancer patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations compared to those without mutations in a population-based sample of incident epithelial ovarian cancer cases. Methods Follow-up for vital status was performed on a population-based sample of 232 women with incident epithelial ovarian cancer recruited between December 13, 2000 and September 30, 2003 in the Tampa Bay area. Survival analysis using Cox regression was performed on (1) all 232 cases and (2) the 209 invasive epithelial ovarian cancer cases. Results of the two analyses were similar, thus data involving the 209 invasive epithelial cancer cases are presented, as this was judged to be more clinically relevant. Results In the multivariate analysis, BRCA status and stage were statistically significant, and were adjusted for in the survival analysis model. The Kaplan–Meier method estimated expected survival at 4 years of 83% of BRCA2 carriers compared to 37% of BRCA1 carriers and 12% of non-carriers. There was a statistically significant difference between BRCA2 carriers and non-carriers (p = 0.013). No statistically significant survival differences were seen for BRCA1 carriers when compared with either BRCA2 carriers or non-carriers. Conclusion These data suggest that BRCA2 mutation carriers with ovarian cancer may have better survival than BRCA1 carriers and non-carriers. The etiology of this possible survival advantage is currently unknown. Larger studies are needed to confirm these results and to clarify their etiology and clinical significance. Article precis Based on a population-based sample of 232 ovarian cancer patients, BRCA2 mutation carriers with ovarian cancer may have better survival than BRCA1 carriers and non-carriers.     

Is BRCA1-5083del19, identified in breast cancer patients of Sicilian origin, a Calabrian founder mutation?

Various studies have been published in Italy regarding the different BRCA1 mutations, but only the BRCA1-5083del19 mutation is recurrent and specific to individuals of Italian descent with a founder effect on the Calabrian population. In our previous study, BRCA1-5083del19 mutation carriers were found in four index cases of 106 Sicilian patients selected for familial and/or hereditary breast/ovarian cancers. The high frequency rate of this mutation identified in the Sicilian population led us to perform haplotype analysis in all family carriers. Five highly polymorphic microsatellite markers were used (D17S1320, D17S932, D17S1323, D17S1326, D17S1325) to establish whether or not all these families had a common ancestor. This analysis showed that all mutation carriers of these families had a common allele. None of the non-carriers of the mutation or of the 50 healthy Sicilian controls showed this haplotype. This allelotype analysis highlighted the presence of a common allele (ancestor), thus suggesting the presence of a founder effect in the Sicilian population. Our results are in contrast with other studies but only the allelotype analysis of all the BRCA1-5083del19 mutation carriers of two neighboring regions of the south of Italy (Calabria and Sicily) will make it possible to identify the real ancestor of this mutation. Antonio Russo and Valentina Calò have contributed equally to this work.     

Clinical management of women with genomic BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations*

Purpose. There is increasing evidence that BRCA1 and BRCA2 associated tumors may differ from sporadic cancers. The purpose of this report is to review the current state of knowledge of BRCA1 and BRCA2, the biology of associated tumors, and possible risk reduction strategies in women with these deleterious mutations. Design and methods. We conducted an extensive literature search of all published articles (including Medline) on preclinical data on the function of BRCA1 and BRCA2, associated tumor pathology, and the clinical management for both unaffected carriers and affected patients. Results. BRCA1 and BRCA2 are likely to act as tumor suppressor genes, and together with RAD51 operate in a common DNA damage response pathway implicated in double-strand repair. Breast cancers associated with BRCA1 are frequently of a higher grade, steroid hormone receptor negative, and appear to have a higher proportion of atypical or typical medullary subtype. Conversely, BRCA2 associated breast cancers do not differ significantly from sporadic cancers. No special tumor phenotype has been ascribed to BRCA1 or BRCA2 associated ovarian cancers. Guidelines for risk reduction strategies for the high risk unaffected carrier have been recommended by expert panels in the USA and Europe. Lifestyle changes, multi-modality screening, chemoprevention, and prophylactic oophorectomy and mastectomy, with their possible benefits and attendant risks are described. Finally, locoregional and systemic treatment in breast and ovarian cancers associated with these mutations, and differences between these and sporadic cancers are discussed. Conclusions. Although the incidence of breast or ovarian cancers that can be attributed to BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations account for less than 5% of all cancers, these cancers may differ from sporadic cases in terms of tumor biology and phenotype. These differences may impact directly on clinical management of breast and ovarian cancer patients, and their relatives. Further recommendations of these patients are constantly changing as new information emerges on the clinical behavior of these cancers.     

Factors influencing ovulation and the risk of ovarian cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

The role of the lifetime number of ovulatory cycles has not been evaluated in the context of BRCA‐associated ovarian cancer. Thus, we conducted a matched case–control study to evaluate the relationship between the cumulative number of ovulatory cycles (and contributing components) and risk of developing ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers (1,329 cases and 5,267 controls). Information regarding reproductive and hormonal factors was collected from a routinely administered questionnaire. Conditional logistic regression was used to evaluate all associations. We observed a 45% reduction in the risk of developing ovarian cancer among women in the lowest vs. highest quartile of ovulatory cycles (OR = 0.55; 95% CI 0.41–0.75, p = 0.0001). Breastfeeding for more than 12 months was associated with a 38% (95% CI 0.48–0.79) and 50% (95% CI 0.29–0.84) reduction in risk among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, respectively. For oral contraceptive use, maximum benefit was seen with five or more years of use among BRCA1 mutation carriers (OR = 0.50; 95% CI 0.40–0.63) and three or more years for BRCA2 mutation carriers (OR = 0.42; 95% CI 0.22–0.83). Increasing parity was associated with a significant inverse trend among BRCA1 (OR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.79–0.96; p‐trend = 0.005) but not BRCA2 mutation carriers (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.81–1.19; p‐trend = 0.85). A later age at menopause was associated with an increased risk in women with a BRCA1 mutation (OR trend = 1.18; 95% CI 1.03–1.35; p = 0.02). These findings support an important role of breastfeeding and oral contraceptive use for the primary prevention of ovarian cancer among women carrying BRCA mutations.     

Cancer risk in Jewish BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: effects of oral contraceptive use and parental origin of mutation

BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations substantially increase breast and ovarian cancer risk, yet penetrance is incomplete. The effects of oral contraceptives (OC) on breast cancer risk in mutation carriers are unclear, and the putative effect of parental origin of mutation on cancer risk has not been reported. Data on OC use and parental origin of the mutation were obtained at counseling from 888 BRCA1 (n = 638) or BRCA2 (n = 250) Jewish Israeli mutation carriers who were counseled and genotyped in a single medical center. Overall, 403 (45.4%) of participants had breast cancer (age at diagnosis 49.65 ± 12.2 years), 112 (12.6%) ovarian cancer (age at diagnosis 56.8 ± 10.8 years) and the rest (n = 373−42%) were asymptomatic carriers (age at counseling 40.7 ± 10.6 years). Of study participants, 472 (53.15%) ever used OC, and 298 used OC for at least 5 years. In 129 the mutation originated on the paternal side as judged by direct testing or obligate carriership and in 460 the mutation was maternally inherited. Multivariate logistic regression analysis, and stratifying for birth year, age at menarche, breast feeding, and number of births, showed that ever use of OC (Hazards Ratio-HR = 1.84 95% CI 1.465–2.314, P = 0.001) and paternal compared with maternal origin of mutation (OR = 1.55 95% CI 1.14–2.12, P = 0.006) were significantly associated with breast cancer and an earlier age at breast cancer diagnosis. The authors conclude that OC use and paternal origin of mutation affect breast cancer penetrance in Jewish BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.     

A common Greenlandic Inuit BRCA1 RING domain founder mutation

Germ-line mutations in the tumour suppressor proteins BRCA1 and BRCA2 predispose to breast and ovarian cancer. We examined 32 breast and/or ovarian cancer patients from Greenland for mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Whereas no mutations were identified in 19 families, 13 families exhibited a BRCA1 exon 3 nucleotide 234 T > G mutation, which has not previously been reported in the breast cancer information core (BIC) database. The mutation changes a conserved cysteine 39 to a glycine in the Zn²⁺ site II of the RING domain, which is essential for BRCA1 ubiquitin ligase activity. Eight of the families had members with ovarian cancer, suggesting that the RING domain may be an ovarian cancer hotspot. By SNP array analysis, we find that all 13 families share a 4.5 Mb genomic fragment containing the BRCA1 gene, showing that the mutation originates from a founder. Finally, analysis of 1152 Inuit, representing almost ~2% of the total Greenlandic Inuit population, showed that the frequency of the mutation was 1.0%. We conclude that the BRCA1 nucleotide 234 T > G is a common Greenlandic Inuit founder mutation. The relative high frequency in the general population, together with the ease of screening and possibility to reduce mortality in gene carriers, may warrant screening of the Greenlandic Inuit population. Provided screening is efficient, about 5% of breast- and 13% of ovarian cancers, respectively, may be prevented. Electronic supplementary material  The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

BRCA1 and BRCA2: Chemosensitivity, Treatment Outcomes and Prognosis

BRCA1 and BRCA2 are important breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes, and mutations in these two genes confer lifetime risks of breast cancer of up to 80% and ovarian cancer risks of up to 40%. Clinico-pathological studies have identified features that are specific to BRCA1-related breast cancer, but this has been more difficult for BRCA2-related breast cancer. Ovarian cancers due to BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations cannot usually be distinguished from their non-hereditary counterparts on morphological grounds, but micro-array data suggest that differences do exist. Prognostic studies have shown that breast cancer in a BRCA1 mutation carrier is likely to have a similar, or worse, outcome than that occurring in a BRCA2- or non-carrier of the same age. By contrast, most studies indicate that women developing a BRCA1/2-related ovarian cancer have an improved survival compared with non-carriers, particularly if they receive platinum-based therapy. In support of this, in vitro chemo-sensitivity studies have found that human cells lacking BRCA1 may be particularly sensitive to cisplatinum and to other drugs that cause double-strand breaks in DNA. Nevertheless, in breast cancer, little is known regarding clinically important differences in response to chemotherapy between BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and non-carriers, and between different chemotherapeutic regimens within existing series of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. There are no published prospective studies. It is hoped that, in the near future, randomised controlled trials will be started with the aim of answering these important clinical questions.     

Occurrence of both breast and ovarian cancer in a woman is a marker for the BRCA gene mutations: a population-based study from Western Sweden

Aim: This study aimed to analyze whether the occurrence of both breast and ovarian cancer in a woman serves as a marker for BRCA gene mutations. Material and methods: This population-based study included 256 women in western Sweden who developed both invasive breast and ovarian tumors between 1958 and 1999. Archival paraffin tissue blocks of their tumors were retrieved for DNA-extraction to analyze the founder mutation, BRCA1 c.3171_3175dup (c.3171ins5), which is most common in this geographic area and four other common Scandinavian BRCA1 gene mutations and one BRCA2 mutation. Together, account these mutations for approximately 75% of the BRCA1/2 gene mutations in the clinical unit. Results: Ninteen percent (95% confidence interval (CI) 14–24%) of the women carried one of the analyzed BRCA1 gene mutations but none of the women were positive for the analyzed BRCA2 mutation. One-third of the women with both tumors before age 60 were mutation carriers. BRCA1 c.3171_3175dup (c.3171ins5) constituted 84% of all identified mutations. Although the majority of breast cancers were invasive ductal and atypical medullary types, a variety of other breast malignancies were seen among mutation carriers. Serous ovarian carcinomas predominated among ovarian tumors. A variety of other ovarian tumors, including three granulosa-theca cell tumors, were also observed among mutation carriers. Conclusions: The occurrence of both breast and ovarian cancer in a woman is associated with a high likelihood of a constitutional BRCA1 mutation. These women and their families might therefore be considered for mutation screening after appropriate genetic counselling.     

Hormone replacement therapy is more prevalent among Jewish BRCA1/2 mutation carriers

The aim of this study was to compare reproductive factors, use of oral contraceptives (OC) and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in consecutive Jewish Ashkenazi breast cancer patients, with and without BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations. Jewish Israeli women with breast cancer (n=385) were genotyped for the three predominant Jewish mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, and data on reproductive factors, OC and HRT use, were analyzed using logistic regression analyses. Overall, 28/385 (7.3%) of participants were mutation carriers, the majority of whom were Ashkenazi (n=22; 78.6%) and were diagnosed with breast cancer at or under age 49 years (n=18; 64.3%). Mutation carriers were more likely than non-carriers to ever use OC (39.3% vs. 20.2%; P=0.053), HRT (35.7% vs. 13.7%; P=0.007), and have first menarche at or below 12 years of age (71.4% vs. 40.6%; P=0.03). Multivariate analysis showed that Ashkenazi women diagnosed with breast cancer under 40 years of age, with a family history of breast/ovarian cancer, who ever used HRT were more likely to be mutation carriers. This study has shown that HRT use is more prevalent among Jewish Ashkenazi mutation carriers, but its role in modifying breast cancer risk in mutation carriers remains unknown.     

Sex Ratio Distortion in Offspring of Families with <Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">BRCA1</Emphasis> or <Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">BRCA2</Emphasis> Mutant Alleles: An Ascertainment Bias Phenomenon?

Summary Background. There has been controversy regarding whether BRCA1 germline mutations favor female births or whether the sex imbalances observed are attributable to ascertainment bias. Our aims were to compare the sex ratios among offspring of BRCA1-positive, BRCA2-positive, and BRCA-negative families undergoing genetic testing in clinical programs, and to determine whether ascertainment bias is responsible for the observed preponderance of female offspring.Patients and methods. A total of 145 breast and/or ovarian cancer families with mutations in BRCA1 (n = 83) or BRCA2 (n = 62), and 90 families without identifiable mutation were collected for the study from familial cancer clinics in Barcelona, Spain, and Boston, US. Sex ratio was analyzed among all births in the families and offspring of all (tested and obligate) carriers. In order to minimize the effect of family history of cancer, the analysis was also performed among offspring of the most recent generation of mutation-positive carriers who did not have affected children and compared with a control group comprised of the offspring of the most recent adult generation of non-carriers from families with a known mutation.Results. There was a statistically higher proportion of female births in all groups (BRCA1 59% (95% CI = 57–61%), BRCA2 58% (56–61%), and BRCA-negative 59% (56–61%), respectively). The female preponderance persisted in analyses limited to offspring of BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers (61% (57–65%), and 62% (58–66%), respectively), with no differences between the two mutation groups. In contrast, the excess of female offspring disappeared when ascertainment or recall biases were minimized, 44% (37–52%), and 39% (26–53%) for BRCA1; 51% (44–58%), and 46% (33–60%) for BRCA2.Conclusions. Our findings suggest that there is no asymmetry in birth outcomes among BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations carriers. Rather ascertainment bias in families participating in genetic testing, or in the family history information they provide is likely to account for excess of female offspring previously reported.     

BRCA1 genetic testing in 106 breast and ovarian cancer families from southern Italy (Sicily): a mutation analyses

Purpose To evaluate the contribution of germline BRCA1 mutations in the incidence of hereditary and familial Breast Cancer (BC) and/or Ovarian Cancer (OC) in patients from Southern Italy (in the region of Sicily) and to identify a possible association between the higher frequency of BRCA1 mutations and a specific familial profile. Experimental design A consecutive series of 650 patients with BC and/or OC diagnosed between 1999 and 2005 were recruited from the Southern Italian region of Sicily, after interview at the “Regional Reference Centre for the Characterization and Genetic Screening of Hereditary Tumors” at the University of Palermo. Genetic counselling allowed us to recruit a total of 106 unrelated families affected with breast and/or ovarian cancer screened for mutations occurring in the whole BRCA1 gene by automatic direct sequencing. Results Germline BRCA1 mutations were found in 17 of 106 (16%) Sicilian families. The HBOC profile had a major frequency (66%) of mutations (P < 0.01). A total of 28 sequence variants was identified. Seven of these were pathogenic, 5 unknown biological variant (UV) and 16 polymorphisms. We also identified a pathological mutation (4843delC) as a possible Sicilian founder mutation. Conclusions The present study is the first BRCA1 disease-associated mutations analysis in Southern Italian families. The early age of onset of such tumors and the association with the HBOC familial profile could be two valid screening factors for the identification of BRCA1 mutation carriers. Finally, we identified a BRCA1 mutation with a possible founder effect. Antonio Russo and Valentina Calò contributed equally to this work     

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers in the Breast Cancer Family Registry: an open resource for collaborative research

The Breast Cancer Family Registry is a resource for interdisciplinary and translational studies of the genetic epidemiology of breast cancer. This resource is available to researchers worldwide for collaborative studies. Herein, we report the results of testing for germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. We have tested 4,531 probands for mutations in BRCA1 and 4,084 in BRCA2. Deleterious mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were identified for 9.8% of probands tested [233/4,531 (5.1%) for BRCA1 and 193/4,084 (4.7%) for BRCA2]. Of 1,385 Ashkenazi Jewish women tested for only the three founder mutations, 17.4% carried a deleterious mutation. In total, from the proband and subsequent family testing, 1,360 female mutation carriers (788 in BRCA1, 566 in BRCA2, 6 in both BRCA1 and BRCA2) have been identified. The value of the resource has been greatly enhanced by determining the germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation statuses of nearly 6,000 probands.     

BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutational spectrum and evidence for genetic anticipation in Portuguese breast/ovarian cancer families

We present the first characterisation of the mutational spectrum of the entire coding sequences and exon–intron boundaries of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes as well as large BRCA1 rearrangements in Portuguese families with inherited predisposition to breast/ovarian cancer. Of the 100 probands studied, pathogenic mutations were identified in 22 (24.7%) of 89 breast and/or ovarian cancer families with more than one affected member (15 in BRCA1 and seven in BRCA2), but in none of the 11 patients without family history of cancer. One (6.7%) of the BRCA1 mutations is a large deletion involving exons 11–15. Seven pathogenic point mutations are novel: 2088C>T, 2156delinsCC, and 4255_4256delCT in BRCA1 and 4608_4609delTT, 5036delA, 5583_5584insT, and 8923C>T in BRCA2. The novel 2156delinsCC was identified in three probands from different families and probably represents a founder mutation in our population. We also found a previously reported 3450_3453del4 mutation in three unrelated patients. In addition to the 22 pathogenic mutations, we identified 19 missense mutations of uncertain pathogenic significance, three of them (5241G>C in BRCA1 and IVS6+13C>T and 3731T>C in BRCA2) previously undescribed. The percentage of cases with truncating mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 was higher in breast/ovarian cancer (37.0%, mostly BRCA1) and male breast cancer (40%, all BRCA2) families than in families with only female breast cancer (17.5%). Interestingly, we found evidence for genetic anticipation regarding age at diagnosis of both breast and ovarian cancer in those families presenting affected members in more than one generation. These findings should be taken into consideration while planning screening and prophylactic measures in families with inherited predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer.     

Primary node negative breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers has a poor outcome

Background:The association between BRCA1 germ-linemutations and breast cancer prognosis is controversial. A historical cohortstudy was designed to determine the prognosis for women with axillary lymphnode negative hereditary breast cancer. Patients and methods:We tested pathology blocks from 118Ashkenazi Jewish women with axillary lymph node negative breast cancer for thepresence of the two common BRCA1 founder mutations, 185delAG and5382insC. Patients were followed up for a median of 76 months. SomaticTP53mutations were screened for by immunohistochemistry, and directsequencing was performed in the BRCA1-positive tumours. Results:Sixteen breast cancer blocks (13.6%) carried aBRCA1 mutation. Young age of onset, high nuclear grade, negativeestrogen receptor status and over-expression of p53 were highly associatedwith BRCA1-positive status (P-values all <0.01).BRCA1 mutation carriers had a higher mortality than non-carriers(five-year overall survival, 50% and 89.6%, respectively,P = 0.0001). Young age of onset, estrogen receptor negative status,nuclear grade 3, and over-expression of p53 also predicted a poor outcome. Coxmultivariate analyses showed that only germ-line BRCA1 mutationstatus was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (P= 0.01). Among nuclear grade 3 tumours, the BRCA1 mutation carrierstatus was a significant prognostic factor of death (risk ratio 5.8,95% confidence interval: 1.5–22, P = 0.009). Sequencingof BRCA1-related breast cancers revealed one TP53missensemutation not previously reported in breast cancer. Conclusions:Using a historical cohort approach, we haveidentified BRCA1 mutation status as an independent prognostic factorfor node negative breast cancer among the Ashkenazi Jewish women. Thosemanaging women carrying a BRCA1 mutation may need take these findingsinto consideration. Additionally, our preliminary results, taken together withthe work of others suggest a different carcinogenic pathway inBRCA1-related breast cancer, compared to non-hereditary cases.