Pregnancy outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND: Early reports described adverse perinatal outcomes of pregnancies after weight loss surgery (WLS), which subsequently raised concerns regarding safety. Our objective was to investigate, in a community-based, academic, tertiary care center, the safety of pregnancies after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and its potential effect on obesity-related perinatal complications. METHODS: The pregnancy outcomes of patients delivering infants after LRYGB at our institution were compared with those of control subjects (stratified by body mass index) who had not undergone WLS. The charts were retrospectively reviewed for demographics, delivery route, and perinatal complications. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients who delivered after LRYGB and 254 controls were identified. The mean interval from LRYGB to conception was 25.4 +/- 13.0 months. In general, the perinatal complications in the LRYGB patients were similar to those in the nonobese controls and lower than in the obese and severe obese controls, although statistical significance was not noted for all complications. No spontaneous abortions or stillbirths occurred in the LRYGB patients. No LRYGB patients required intravenous nutrition or hydration. The overall incidence of cesarean section in the LRYGB patients was similar to that in the obese and severely obese controls but significantly greater than that in the nonobese controls. The complication rates were similar in pregnancies occurring "early" (<12 mo) versus "late" (>18 mo) after LRYGB. CONCLUSION: The results of our study have shown that pregnancy after LRYGB is safe, with an incidence of perinatal complications similar to that of nonobese patients, and lower than that of obese and severely obese patients, who had not undergone WLS. Larger studies are required to demonstrate statistically significant improvements in outcome in patients treated with WLS.     

Comparison of totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and traditional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic gastric bypass is a technically demanding operation, especially when hand-sewing is required. Robotics may help facilitate the performance of this difficult operation. This study was undertaken to compare a single surgeon's results using the daVinci Surgical System with those using traditional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) when the techniques were learned simultaneously. METHODS: From July 2004 to April 2005, the new laparoscopic fellow's first 50 patients were randomized to undergo either LRYGB or totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (TRRYGB). Data were collected on patient age, gender, body mass index (BMI), co-morbidities, operative time, complication rates, and length of stay. Student's t test with unequal variances was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: No significant differences in age, gender, co-morbidities, complication rates, or length of stay were found between the two groups. The mean operating time was significantly shorter for TRRYGB than for LRYGB (130.8 versus 149.4 minutes; P = 0.02), with a significant difference in minutes per BMI (2.94 versus 3.47 min/BMI; P = 0.02). The largest difference was in patients with a BMI >43 kg/m(2), for whom the difference in procedure time was 29.6 minutes (123.5 minutes for TRRYGB versus 153.2 minutes for LRYGB; P = 0.009) and a significant difference in minutes per BMI (2.49 versus 3.24 min/BMI; P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that the use of the daVinci Surgical System for TRRYGB is safe and feasible. The operating room time is shorter with the use of the robotic system during a surgeon's learning curve, and that decrease is maximized in patients with a larger BMI. TRRYGB may be a better approach to gastric bypass when hand-sewing is required, especially early in a surgeon's experience.     

Internal hernia after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND: Internal hernia (IH) is a technical complication of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) that can have severe consequences. Little has been written on characterizing this complication. Antecolic Roux limb passage has been suggested to be safe without defect closure. METHODS: The records of 785 patients who underwent LRYGBP (136 antecolic, 649 retrocolic) between 1998 and 2003 were reviewed. In our early experience (n = 107), we used a retrocolic technique without defect closure. RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent surgical intervention for IH. The median interval between LRYGBP and symptom onset was 303 days (range, 25 to 1642 days). Abdominal pain was uniformly present, and 63% of patients developed nausea and/or vomiting. Exploratory laparoscopy was attempted in 94% of patients; conversion was necessary in 33%. A total of 21 IHs were identified (13 Petersen's, 5 mesocolic, 2 jejunojejunal, and 1 adhesion-related hernia). No nonviable bowel was identified, and no deaths occurred. A retrocolic technique involving closure of all defects resulted in the lowest rate of hernias (3/542; 0.55%) compared with the antecolic (12/136; 8.81%; P < .0001) and early retrocolic techniques (6/107; 5.6%; P < .0002). CONCLUSION: IH can occur long after gastric bypass surgery, and a low threshold for reoperation is crucial to avoid gut infarction. A retrocolic technique with defect closure appears to afford the lowest risk of IH. The lower incidence of IH in other series after antecolic technique likely results from a less aggressive detection and management approach, because our nonclosure technique could not differ from that of other authors. All defects must be closed to minimize the risk of hernia, whether antecolic or retrocolic.     

Management of gastrogastric fistula after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND: Gastrogastric fistula (GGF) secondary to marginal ulceration (MU) is a reported complication of open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; however, its frequency after laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGBP) is likely underreported. We present five cases of GGF and detail the management algorithm, including medical, endoscopic, and laparoscopic interventions. METHODS: Data from 282 patients undergoing LGBP from October 2002 to January 2005 were entered into a prospective, longitudinal database. All patients who subsequently presented with GGF were analyzed. Patients who developed GGF were compared with those who did not using Student's t-test. RESULTS: Five patients (1.8%) subsequently developed GGF. Upper gastrointestinal radiographic evaluation documented the presence of a GGF in these patients, and upper endoscopy confirmed the diagnosis of MU. The mean interval between initial LGBP and subsequent diagnosis of GGF was 8.8 months. Patients who developed GGF were significantly younger (32.4 years vs 41.2 years; P = .007) and had lost significantly more weight 1 year after surgery (82.7% excess weight loss vs 70.0% excess weight loss; P = .003). No difference was noted when comparing operative time (164 minutes vs 148 minutes) or preoperative BMI (45.6 kg/m2 vs 51.4 kg/m2). All MU/GGF patients were treated initially with high-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. In one patient, the GGF closed with PPI therapy alone. A second patient's GGF was successfully resolved with PPI therapy plus endoscopic injection of fibrin sealant. The remaining three cases were managed with laparoscopic division of the fistula after initial unsuccessful PPI therapy. In these patients, the GGF was of larger diameter than in those patients whose GGF closed with medical therapy alone. CONCLUSIONS: MU/GGF should be considered in the differential diagnosis of all postoperative gastric bypass patients who present with abdominal pain. In our series, GGF was always associated with MU. Early diagnosis of GGF can be successfully treated with PPI therapy. Smaller-diameter tracts that do not resolve with medical therapy may respond to endoscopic therapy. Large-caliber fistula are less likely to respond to medical or endoscopic therapy but can be managed laparoscopically.     

Taste change after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding

BACKGROUND: Many patients have described changes in taste perception after weight loss surgery. Our hypothesis was that patients develop postoperative changes in taste that vary by bariatric procedure. METHODS: Patients who underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) or laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) completed a 23-question institutional review board-approved survey postoperatively regarding their degree and type of taste changes and food aversion and how these influenced their eating habits. RESULTS: A total of 127 patients participated. After removing the inadequately completed surveys, 82 LRYGB and 28 LAGB patients were included. Of these, 87% of LRYGB and 69% of LAGB patients believed taste is important to the enjoyment of food. More LRYGB patients (82%) than LAGB patients (46%) reported a change in the taste of food or beverages after surgery (P <.001). In addition, 92% of LAGB versus 59% of LRYGB patients characterized the change as a decrease in the intensity of taste (P <.05). Additionally, 68% of LRYGB and 67% of LAGB patients found certain foods repulsive and had developed aversions. Also, 66% of LRYGB and 70% of LAGB patients believed the taste changes were greater than expected preoperatively. Most patients (83% of LRYGB and 69% of LAGB patients) agreed that the loss of taste led to better weight loss. CONCLUSION: Although most LRYGB and many LAGB patients experienced taste changes and food repulsion postoperatively, procedural differences were found in these taste changes. Taste changes need to be investigated further as a possible mechanism of weight loss after bariatric surgery.     

Emergency room visits after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity

BACKGROUND: Patients can be symptomatic after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass because of either surgical complications or physiologic changes and adjustment to the new anatomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors that could influence the rate of postoperative emergency room admissions (ERAs) and the clinical implication of these visits for patients who have undergone laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. METHODS: The medical records of patients who underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity from 2001 to 2004 were retrospectively reviewed. The data of patients with a history of an ERA after surgery was compared with the data of patients without a history of ERAs. The data collected included demographics, weight, body mass index, operative time, and more. The ERAs were subdivided into early ERAs and late ERAs, and the data were analyzed further. RESULTS: Of 733 patients, 228 (31.1%) had a history of ERAs. Patients with early postoperative complication (<7 days after the procedure) had a greater rate of ERAs (60.9% versus 30.1%, P <.05). The operative time was significantly longer in the ERA group (91.4 versus 86.5 min). The most frequent complaint in the emergency room was abdominal pain (61.4%) followed by vomiting (35.5%). Gastric outlet obstruction was the most frequent cause of an ERA within 2 weeks after surgery. Most patients were treated conservatively. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the rate of potential ERAs should not be disregarded. A prolonged operative time and early postoperative complications were significant predictors for late ERAs. Abdominal pain with or without vomiting was the most common presenting symptom. Most patients can be treated conservatively.     

Accessing the common bile duct after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

We report on the clinical course of 2 patients who underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity and subsequently presented with biliary complications of choledocholithiasis in 1 case and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction in the other. The approach to these complex problems is described. Both patients underwent percutaneous transhepatic access to the common bile duct (CBD) for balloon sphincteroplasty. In 1 patient, percutaneous choledochoscopy was used for endoluminal visualization of the CBD. A literature review of the management of biliary problems after gastric bypass is presented. Although access to the CBD is limited, the options include percutaneous transhepatic instrumentation of the CBD, percutaneous or laparoscopic transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), transenteric endoscopic cholangiopancreatography, ERCP using specialized endoscopes, and laparoscopic or open CBD exploration. Bile duct pathology after laparoscopic gastric bypass can be safely and effectively managed using a variety of techniques.     

Laparoscopic resection of gastric diverticulum presenting after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Gastric diverticula are extremely rare and may be congenital or acquired. Postgastrectomy formation of gastric diverticula has been attributed to outpouching through the weakened wall of the stomach. When symptomatic, gastric diverticula may cause pain, nausea, dysphagia, and vomiting. Gastric diverticula may also be associated with ectopic mucosa, ulcers, and neoplastic changes. We report a case of gastric cardia diverticulum that became symptomatic after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The patient was successfully treated with laparoscopic resection.     

Comment on: Physical function improvements after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery

BackgroundObesity is a risk factor for impaired physical function and disability, with the degree of impairment most compromised in extreme obesity. Mild-to-moderate weight loss has been shown to improve function in older adults. The impact of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery on weight loss and physical function in morbidly obese individuals was assessed.MethodsThis longitudinal, observational study followed up 28 morbidly obese men and women (body mass index ≥40.0 kg/m²) for 12 months after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Physical function (self-report using the Fitness Arthritis and Seniors Trial disability questionnaire; performance tasks using the Short Physical Performance Battery and a lateral mobility task); strength (maximal isometric knee torque); and body composition measured using bioelectrical impedance were determined before surgery (baseline) and at 3 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery.ResultsThe 12-month weight loss was 34.2% (excess weight loss 59.8%), with a mean fat mass loss of 46 kg and a loss of fat free mass of 6.6 kg. The performance tasks and self-reported questionnaire scores had improved by 3 months after surgery compared with baseline, with selected measures showing less impairment and disability in as few as 3 weeks after surgery. Muscle quality, as measured using the maximal torque per kilogram body weight, was greater at 6 months than at baseline.ConclusionThe results of our study have shown that in morbidly obese individuals with a high risk of mobility impairments, surgical procedures to reduce body weight increase mobility and improve performance of daily activities in as few as 3 weeks after gastric bypass surgery.