Optimal management of chronic hepatitis B patients receiving nucleos(t)ide analogues

Management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is still considered a challenge in clinical practice. Patients must be carefully evaluated before starting therapy. This includes virology and laboratory assessments, an estimation of fibrosis by invasive and/or noninvasive methods, and an estimation of the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) with a high barrier to resistance (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate [TDF], entecavir [ETV] and tenofovir alafenamide [TAF]) are the most frequently used treatments because of their good long‐term efficacy and tolerability. None of these options has been shown to be more effective than the other, but certain factors should be considered when selecting the best therapy for specific populations. Most patients achieve a virological and biochemical response to these agents, with a low rate of emerging resistance during long‐term treatment. However, the rate of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss is low and in most cases NAs therapy is lifelong. Safety concerns for long‐term NA use have become a priority in the management of CHB, in particular, the risk of impaired kidney function and bone marrow density loss described with TDF regimens. The risk of HCC is not completely eliminated by NAs. Thus, patients at higher risk should be identified and provided with appropriate surveillance.     

Current Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis B

Although the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B has decreased considerably in recent years due to widespread use of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine, its prevalence still remains high in adults, and this can place a significant burden on health care in areas with endemic HBV. Since the introduction of nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs), there has been marked improvement in the care of patients with chronic hepatitis B, resulting in increased survival. However, the emergence of drug resistance in patients treated with NUCs is a major concern. The number of multi-drug resistant patients is increasing, and many patients may not respond to the currently available drugs. In this review, we describe the current status of NUC therapy for antiviral-naïve and -resistant patients.     

The suppressive effect of nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment on the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B patients

The development of nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) has influenced hepatitis B virus management. However, the annual incidence rate during NA treatment has been reported to be 0.3–1.2% in non‐cirrhosis cases and 1.8–6.0% in cirrhosis cases, indicating that the suppressive effect of NA treatment on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) would be insufficient. Past studies, including one randomized control trial that compared lamivudine treatment with placebo, have revealed that NA treatment could suppress the incidence of HCC in patients with advanced fibrosis. However, it remains unknown whether NA treatment can suppress the incidence of HCC in chronic hepatitis patients without advanced fibrosis. The HCC incidence in patients treated with entecavir was similar to that of those treated with lamivudine, although entecavir exhibits a stronger viral suppression than lamivudine. The following risk factors related to the incidence of HCC during NA treatment have been identified: older age, male gender, pre‐existing cirrhosis, a family clustering of hepatitis B virus, lower platelet counts, and higher hepatitis B core‐related antigens as baseline factors and higher alpha fetoprotein levels as an on‐treatment factor. Conversely, the loss of the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) by interferon or NA was correlated with a lower HCC incidence rate. Because interferon treatment has much more effects on reducing HBsAg levels compared with NA treatment, a combination treatment with NA and pegylated interferon can bring additional reduction of HBsAg levels compared with NA monotherapy. Further study is needed to clarify this.     

Hepatitis B virus drug resistance to current nucleos(t)ide analogs: Mechanisms and mutation sites

Nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) have become the mainstream drugs for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Drug resistance to NAs, however, has posed a major obstacle in obtaining sustained viral suppression. Standardized definitions of terms and nomenclature in discussing NAs resistance have been proposed. Drug resistance to NAs is produced by a combination of viral, host and antiviral drug factors. A detailed understanding of the mechanisms and effects of mutation sites that cause resistance to NAs is important for the design of rational treatment and management of patients with existing drug resistance.     

Impact of nucleos(t)ide analogues on the estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients with chronic hepatitis B: a prospective cohort study in China

Chronic hepatitis B therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogues, particularly tenofovir or adefovir, may affect renal function. To date, there has not been a head‐to‐head controlled study to assess estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) fluctuations in nucleos(t)ide‐treated CHB patients. We aimed to evaluate the long‐term effects of nucleos(t)ide on eGFR in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B. This prospective cohort study included 275 patients. Patient subgroups included those treated with lamivudine (n = 50), adefovir (n = 60), telbivudine (n = 68) and entecavir (n = 61); untreated patients (n = 36) served as control. After an average follow‐up duration of 23 months, eGFR calculated by Cockcroft–Gault and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formulas increased by 18.35 mL/min and 19.34 mL/min (P < 0.0001) in the telbivudine group, respectively, and decreased by 10.95 mL/min and 12.17 mL/min (P = 0.0001) in the adefovir group, respectively. Even if renal function was normal or mildly impaired at baseline, eGFR increased significantly more in the telbivudine group than in the other groups (P < 0.001). More patients in the adefovir group (23%) had a ≥20% decrease in eGFR than the other groups (P < 0.0001). More patients in the telbivudine group (31%) had a ≥20% increase in eGFR than the other groups (P < 0.0001). In conclusion, prolonged telbivudine therapy resulted in improved eGFR, while adefovir therapy was associated with decreased eGFR. Lamivudine and entecavir therapy did not significantly influence eGFR.     

Nucleos(t)ide analogues to treat hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after radical resection

Significant advances have been made in nucleos(t)ideanalogue(NA) therapy to treat chronic hepatitis B,and this therapy reduces the risk of hepatitis B virus(HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) in somepatients.However,whether NAs can also prevent recurrence after radical resection of HBV-related HCC remains controversial and is an important question,giventhat most patients will experience recurrence within afew years of curative surgery.Here we systematicallyreviewed the literature since 2004 on outcomes afteradministering NAs to patients with HBV-related HCCfollowing radical resection.We focused on treatmentindications,duration,effects on recurrence-free survivaland overall survival,and the management of NA resistance.We find that patients with HCC should stronglyconsider NA therapy if they are positive for HBV-DNA,and that the available evidence suggests that postoperative NA therapy can increase both recurrence-free andoverall survival.To minimize drug resistance,cliniciansshould opt for potent analogues with higher resistancebarriers,and they should monitor the patient carefully for emergence of NA-resistant HBV.     

Kinetics of serum O-glycosylated M-hepatitis B surface antigen with hepatocellular carcinoma history and nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy in hepatitis B patients

A newly developed O-glycosylated M-hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAgGi) measurement system can detect hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) associated with infectious particles. We investigated the association of HBsAgGi levels with clinical parameters and a history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development in a cross-sectional cohort analysis (Study 1) as well as the quantitative changes in HBsAgGi during nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy in a longitudinal cohort analysis (Study 2). A total of 124 patients with genotype C chronic HBV infection were analysed in Study 1 to evaluate correlations of HBsAgGi with conventional HBV markers and HCC history. Among those, 36 patients receiving NA therapy were enrolled in Study 2 for quantitative comparisons between pre-treatment baseline and 48 weeks of NA therapy. In Study 1, serum HBsAgGi was significantly associated with HBsAg (r = .5857, p < .00001) and weakly but significantly correlated with HBV DNA (r = .2936, p = .001). Although HBsAgGi (p = .111) was comparable between HCC history (+) group and HCC history (−) group, the HBsAgGi/HBsAg ratio (p = .011) was significantly higher in HCC history (+) patients. In Study 2, HBsAgGi was significantly decreased after 48 weeks of NA therapy (p < .001). HBsAg findings were similar (p = .005) along with an HBV DNA reduction (p < .001). In the baseline hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) (+) subgroup, HBsAgGi decreased significantly between baseline and 48 weeks of NA (p = .005), while HBsAg was comparable (p = .051). Low HBsAg and high HBsAgGi were associated with a history of HCC development. HBsAgGi decreased significantly by 48-week NA therapy.     

Considerations for the long-term treatment of chronic hepatitis B with nucleos(t)ide analogs

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) with nucleos(t)ide analogs is often required over a prolonged period to achieve durable virologic suppression. One barrier to the success of long-term therapy is the emergence of drug-resistant mutants. Current guidelines therefore recommend the most potent drugs with optimal resistance profiles, that is, entecavir and tenofovir are used as first-line monotherapies in CHB. Characteristics of the hepatitis B virus, the disease, the patient and the drug can influence the response to antiviral treatment and risk of relapse. This review discusses factors to consider maximizing the chances of successful long-term treatment of CHB, and provides an overview of the long-term efficacy and safety data that have become available over the 4–5 years since entecavir and tenofovir were first approved for the treatment of CHB. Recent findings on whether and under what circumstances long-term therapy of CHB might be stopped are also discussed.     

Prevalence and risk factors for viral blipping in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with nucleos (t) ide analogues

The clinical relevance of viral blipping during nucleos (t) ide analogue (NA) treatment is unclear in chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We investigated the prevalence, risk factors and clinical outcomes for those with viral blipping during NA treatment. A retrospective cohort study investigated consecutively treated CHB patients from May 2008 to February 2015 on the NAs such as entecavir (ETV), tenofovir (TDF) and lamivudine (LAM). Included patients were previously treatment naive. Viral blipping was defined as serum HBV DNA >20 IU/mL on one occasion, and not >200 IU/mL, with subsequent measurement returning to undetectable levels, that is <20 IU/mL. A total of 242 treatment‐compliant CHB patients were included with 44 (18.2%) experiencing viral blipping. In multivariable Cox regression, Asian race (HR=7.40, 95% CI 1.01–54.29, P<.049), LAM therapy (vs ETV/TDF, HR=2.53, 95% CI 1.29–4.95, P<.007), higher creatinine (per SD, HR=1.47, 95% CI 1.21–1.79, P<.001), HBeAg positivity (HR=2.68, 95% CI 1.39–5.03, P<.003) and longer time to achieve undetectable HBV DNA (per month, HR=1.05, 95% CI 1.02–1.08, P=.001) were associated with an increased risk of viral blipping. Viral blipping did not show any significant association with viral breakthrough, HBsAg loss, ALT flares or disease progression. Viral blipping is a frequent event during NA therapy; however, it did not lead to any clinically significant outcomes. Thus, it may not require more frequent blood work and patient visits in clinical practice.     

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B with nucleos(t)ide analogues

Recently antiviral therapies for chronic hepatitis B using nucleos(t)ide analogues have become standard treatment modalities on the basis of several independent guidelines, starting with those of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and other such organizations and bodies, including the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL), and the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW)'s research team. The philosophies underlying such treatment strategies are considered basically equivalent. MHLW's guidelines define subjects for medical intervention to be cases measuring alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥31 IU/L, with serological hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level ≥5 log copies/mL for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)‐positive cases, and serological HBV DNA level ≥4 log copies/mL for HBeAg‐negative cases. These Japanese guidelines advocate entecavir as the first‐line treatment option for nucleos(t)ide‐naïve patients, and combination treatment of lamivudine and adefovir as the basis of treatment for patients with lamivudine‐ and/or entecavir‐resistant viruses. Of particular note for patients undergoing lamivudine treatment with persistent HBV DNA level < 2.1 log copies/mL is the recommendation of a switch to entecavir. Early detection of drug‐resistant virus is desirable after initiation of nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment, but such a procedure is not uniformly available at all medical institutions. Nevertheless, timely estimation of potential early‐stage drug‐resistant virus development is crucial for getting a head start on treatment. HBV core‐related antigen (HBcrAg) level or HBV DNA level are considered useful markers for the appearance of such drug‐resistant viruses.     

Effect of nucleos(t)ide analogues on blood lipid profiles in patients with chronic hepatitis B: A cross-sectional survey

This study aimed to explore the effects of the 3 nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) on lipid levels. We retrospectively included patients treated with NAs at 2 centers and collected their clinical data at their visiting points. Differences in blood lipid levels were analyzed by statistical methods, and factors related to hyperlipidemia were discussed. In these 2 centers, the prevalence rates of hypercholesterolemia were 12/181 (6.6%) for tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF)-, 0/158 (0%) for tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-, and 13/182 (7.1%) for entecavir (ETV)-treated individuals (P = .003). The prevalence rates of hypertriglyceridemia were 30/181 (16.6%) for TAF-, 11/158 (7.0%) for TDF-, and 26/182 (14.3%) for ETV-treated individuals (P = .025). In TAF (n = 181, 10 [6, 15] months), TDF (n = 158, 18 [7.5, 45] months), and ETV (n = 182, 24 [10, 60] months) groups, total cholesterol (TC) levels were 4.63 ± 0.91 mmol/L, 3.86 ± 0.61 mmol/L, and 4.53 ± 0.87 mmol/L, respectively; triglyceride (TG) levels were 1.27 ± 0.76 mmol/L, 0.87 ± 0.51 mmol/L, and 1.14 ± 0.67 mmol/L, respectively (P < .001). In multivariate regression analysis, factors associated with hypercholesterolemia were age (adjusted hazard risk [HR] = 1.055 [1.018–1.094]; P = .003) and body mass index (BMI) (adjusted HR = 0.817 [0.669–0.998]; P = .048). Factors associated with hypertriglyceridemia were TAF group (vs. TDF group) (adjusted HR = 0.405 [0.167–0.980]; P = .045), age (adjusted HR = 1.028 [1.002–1.055]; P = .038), and sex (adjusted HR = 0.190 [0.079–0.456]; P < .001). Among the patients treated with TAF (10 [6, 15] months), TDF (18 [7.5, 45] months), and ETV (24 [10, 60] months), the blood lipid levels in the TDF group were lower than those in the TAF group and ETV group, and the occurrence of hyperlipidemia was associated with age, sex, BMI, and different treatment.     

核苷（酸）类似物抗病毒治疗慢性乙型肝炎的优化策略

目前我国有4种核苷（酸）类似物可用于慢性乙型肝炎的抗病毒治疗,即拉米夫定、阿德福韦酯、恩替卡韦和替比夫定。但由于患者的性别、年龄、遗传背景、感染乙型肝炎病毒（HBV）的途径、病毒基因型、病程长短、肝脏病变程度和对治疗药物敏感性等不同,即使有同样治疗适应证的患者按同样的规范方案治疗后,仍有     

Nucleos(t)ide analogs in the prevention of hepatitis B virus related hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) is among the most common cancer types and causes of cancer related mortality worldwide.Almost 50% of all HCC cases globally are attributable to chronic hepatitis B virus(HBV) infection.The incidence rates of HCC in untreated Asian subjects with HBV infection was estimated to be 0.2% in inactive carriers,0.6% for those with chronic hepatitis without cirrhosis,and 3.7% for those with compensated cirrhosis.In Western populations,HCC incidences are reported to be 0.02% in inactive carriers,0.3% in subjects with chronic hepatitis without cirrhosis,and 2.2% in subjects with compensated cirrhosis.Despite effective antiviral treatment options which are able to transform chronic hepatitis into an inactive carrier state,the risk of HCC cannot be fully ruled out to exclude those patients from surveillance.Newer nucleos(t)ide analogues(NAs) as entecavir and tenofovir are very potent in terms of sustained virological suppression which leads to improved liver histology.However,they do not have any influence on the ccc DNA or integrated DNA of HBV in the liver.Nonetheless,viral replication is the only modifiable component among the established risk factors for HBV-related HCC with the current treatment options.In this review,it was aimed to summarize cumulative evidence behind the concept of prevention of HBV related HCC by NAs,and to discuss remaining obstacles to eliminate the risk of HCC.     

Cumulative incidence and risk factors for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B who achieved sustained disappearance of viremia by nucleos(t)ide analog treatment

Aim

Nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) therapy has been reported to reduce the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, some patients who achieve hepatitis B virus (HBV)‐DNA disappearance from serum by NA develop HCC. In this study, we investigated the cumulative incidence and risk factors for HCC in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who achieved sustained disappearance of viremia by NA treatment.

Methods

A total of 133 CHB patients (median age, 51 years; 79 men [59%]; 28 with cirrhosis [21%]) who received NA therapy and achieved HBV‐DNA disappearance from serum were analyzed retrospectively. We evaluated the cumulative incidence of HCC and risk factors associated with HCC based on data collected at the time of HBV‐DNA disappearance.

Results

Thirteen patients developed HCC during the follow‐up period. The 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐year cumulative incidence of HCC was 0.0%, 7.8%, and 11.1%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, advanced age (hazard ratio [HR], 4.601; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.220–17.351; P = 0.024), liver cirrhosis (HR, 5.563; 95% CI, 1.438–21.519; P = 0.013), and higher HBV core‐related antigen (HBcrAg) levels (HR, 13.532; 95% CI, 1.683–108.815; P = 0.014) at the time of HBV‐DNA disappearance were significantly associated with the development of HCC.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate the importance of continuous HCC surveillance especially in patients with advanced age, cirrhosis, and/or higher serum levels of HBcrAg, even if they achieve HBV‐DNA disappearance.     

Current clinical evidence for nucleos(t)ide analogues in patients with HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma

Introduction: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of death globally and is frequently seen following Hepatitis B virus (HBV) or Hepatitis C virus infection. Areas with high HBV infection rates, such as Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, are therefore also high-risk areas for HCC.

Areas covered: This review identifies and discusses the current evidence from robust clinical trials which have investigated the benefits of Nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) antiviral therapy in HBV-related HCC patients, including HCC patients that underwent liver transplantation and HCC patients with or without curative treatment. In addition, we assess how this evidence has influenced current clinical practice, with a particular focus on those areas of high HBV infection rates.

Expert commentary: A number of studies have assessed whether NA antiviral treatment can improve the prognosis of HBV-related HCC patients. In this review we evaluate the current evidence, including that from trials in Asia, for antiviral NA treatments in HBV-related HCC patients. We also focus on those NAs with a high genetic barrier to resistance (i.e. ETV or TDF), on different therapeutic approaches, and on the future evidence that is required in this field.     

Predictors of HBeAg seroconversion after long-term nucleos(t)ide analogues treatment for chronic hepatitis B: a multicenter study in real clinical setting

Aims

To evaluate the HBeAg seroconversion rate in real clinical setting and explore its predictors in long-term nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) treatment for chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

Antiviral effect of entecavir in nucleos(t)ide analogue‐naïve and nucleos(t)ide analogue‐experienced chronic hepatitis B patients without virological response at week 24 or 48 of therapy

We investigated the antiviral effect of entecavir in nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)‐naïve and NA‐experienced chronic hepatitis B patients without virological response (VR, HBV DNA < 300 copies/mL) at week 24 or 48. A total of 369 NA‐naïve and 181 NA‐experienced patients treated with entecavir monotherapy were analysed. Of the 369 NA‐naïve patients, 34 did not achieve VR at week 48. Of them, patients with HBV DNA ≤2000 copies/mL at week 48 achieved a higher VR rate than those with HBV DNA >2000 copies/mL (18/23 vs 3/11, P = 0.004). Two naïve patients with HBV DNA >2000 copies/mL developed entecavir‐ or lamivudine‐resistant mutants. In 98 lamivudine‐experienced patients without ever having lamivudine resistance, most patients with VR (72/72) and partial VR (300–10⁴ copies/mL; 20/23) at week 24 or VR at week 48 (89/91) could maintain or achieve VR after prolonged therapy. In 75 patients with prior resistance to lamivudine, prolonged entecavir therapy led to low VR rate in those without VR at week 24 (13/45) or 48 (4/34) and high entecavir‐resistance rate in those with or without VR at week 24 (6/30 with and 23/45 without) and 48 (8/41 with and 21/34 without). VR at week 48 was an independent predictor (HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.06–0.33) for entecavir‐resistant mutant development among the 75 patients with prior lamivudine‐resistant mutants. In conclusion, prolonged entecavir treatment resulted in a poor response in naïve patients with HBV DNA >2000 copies/mL at week 48 and patients with prior lamivudine‐resistant mutants without VR at week 24 or 48.     

Pronounced decline of serum HBsAg in chronic hepatitis B patients with long-term effective nucleos(t)ide analogs therapy

Aims: This study aims to investigate the kinetics of serum HBsAg levels in chronic hepatitis B patients with long-term nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) therapy.

Methods: This was a retrospective clinical study. Serum HBsAg in serial samples of 94 patients, who received at least 8 years of NAs therapy, were measured using Elecsys^® HBsAg II Quant Assay.

Results: In this cohort, serum HBsAg levels reduced from 3.80 log10?IU/mL at baseline to 2.72 log10?IU/mL at year 8 (p?p?p?=?.001). As compared to patients with slow (0–1 log10?IU/mL) or steady HBsAg(≤0 log10?IU/mL) decline at year 1, patients with a rapid HBsAg (≥1 log10?IU/mL) decline had a significantly lower HBsAg levels from year 2 to 8. However, Cox regression analysis showed that only absolute HBsAg levels at year 1 was an independent predictor of subsequent HBsAg <1000?IU/mL at year 8 of antiviral therapy(HR 0.242, p?=?.004).

Conclusion: Pronounced HBsAg declines could be achieved in patients after long-term effective therapy with NAs, and on-treatment low serum HBsAg level at year 1 might be a predictor of serum HBsAg <1000?IU/mL at year 8.     

Benefits of nucleos(t)ide analog treatments for hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis

Chronic hepatitis B infection induces progressive liver disease. Before nucleos(t)ide analogs(NUCs) became established as a safe and effective treatment for hepatitis B,it was difficult to suppress the activity of the hepatitis B virus(HBV). Currently,many patients withhepatitis or cirrhosis associated with HBV are treated with NUCs for an extended period of time,and the effects,benefits,and limitations of these treatments have been apparent. This article reviews HBV-related cirrhosis,its natural course and survival,histological improvement after NUC treatments,treatment effects for decompensated cirrhosis,the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) after NUC treatments,and the efficacy of NUC treatments before and after the treatment of patients for HBV-related HCC. Of particular interest are the histological improvements,including regression of fibrosis,that have been achieved with NUC treatments. Liver function of patients with decompensated cirrhosis has significantly improved regardless of the type of NUC applied,and treatment with NUCs has reduced the incidence of HCC in cirrhotic patients. However,cirrhosis remains the strongest risk factor for HCC occurrence following NUC treatments,and the long-term cumulative incidence of HCC after NUC treatments remains high. When recurrence does occur,it is important to reconsider the treatment modality according to the degree of improved liver function that was achieved.