快速心房起搏时SV间期与SS间期的比值在房室结折返性心动过速慢径消融中的应用

评价快速心房起搏时最快 1∶1房室传导的SV间期 (SV间期 )与 1∶1房室传导的最短S1S1间期 (SS间期 )的比值 (SV/SS)在房室结折返性心动过速 (AVNRT)慢径消融中的应用 ,将AVNRT分为房室结功能曲线连续组 (Ⅰ组 ,10例 )及房室结功能曲线不连续组 (Ⅱ组 ,17例 )测量心房分级递增刺激时的SS间期与SV间期及SV/SS ,并进行消融前、后和组间比较。结果显示 ,两组消融后SV间期较消融前明显缩短 (Ⅰ组 :2 2 1.0± 2 2 .3vs 35 7.0± 43.7ms;Ⅱ组 :2 0 2 .1± 30 .6vs 379.4± 44 .2ms,P均 <0 .0 5 ) ;消融前后SS间期无明显变化 (Ⅰ组 :310 .0± 40 .6vs 30 8.0± 36 .8ms;Ⅱ组 :332 .9± 48.1vs 336 .5± 6 2 .3ms) ;两组中所有患者消融前SV/SS比值均 >1,而消融后SV/SS比值均 <1。结论 :SV/SS可作为慢径消融成功终点的辅助观察指标之一 ,尤其对于房室结传导曲线呈连续性者 ,使用此方法可简便地观察消融终点 ,增加消融的目的性。     

Multiple Atrioventricular Nodal Pathways in Humans:

Multiple AV Nodal Pathways. Introduction : Multiple AV nodal pathway physiology can be demonstrated in certain patients with clinical AV reentrant tachycardia.
Methods and Results : Evidence suggesting multiple AV nodal pathway conduction was present in seven (two males; age range 15 to 75 years) of 78 patients (9%) who underwent electrophysiologic studies for AV nodal tachycardia. The presence of two discrete discontinuities in the AV nodal conduction curves suggested triple AV nodal pathway conduction. Detailed mapping of their retrograde atrial activation sequence was performed along the tricuspid annulus from the coronary sinus ostium to the His-bundle electrogram recording site. Three zones (anterior, middle, and posterior) correspond to the upper, middle, and lower third of the triangle of Koch, respectively. The fast pathway exits were determined as anterior (4/7) or middle (3/7), the intermediate pathway exits as middle (4/7) or posterior (3/7), and the slow pathway exits as middle (1/7) or posterior (6/7). Other evidence suggesting multiple AV nodal pathway conduction includes: (1) triple ventricular depolarizations from a single atrial impulse; (2) sequential dual ventricular echoes; (3) spontaneous transformation between the slow-fast and fast-slow forms of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia; and (4) persistent cycle length alternans during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. In four patients, all three pathways were shown to be involved in AV nodal echoes or reentrant tachycardia.
Conclusion : Multiple AV nodal pathways are not uncommon and can be identified by careful electrophysiologic elucidation and mapping technique.     

Effects of Partial and Complete Ablation of the Slow Pathway on Fast Pathway Properties in Patients with Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Fast Pathway Properties. Introduction: The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the effects of complete and partial ablation of slow pathway function on the fast pathway effective refractory period (ERP).
Methods and Results: The subjects were 20 patients (mean age 43 ± 13 years) with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), no structural heart disease, and easily inducible AVNRT. Autonomic blockade was achieved with propranolol (0.2 mg/kg) and atropine (0.04 mg/kg). After elimination of AVNRT and during autonomic blockade, the presence of residual slow pathway function was determined by the presence of a single AV nodal echo and/or dual AV nodal physiology. After autonomic blockade and before ablation, the mean fast pathway ERP was 319 ± 44 msec and the mean slow pathway ERP was 251 ± 31 msec. After slow pathway ablation and during autonomic blockade, 7 patients had residual slow pathway function and 13 did not. Complete loss of slow pathway function was associated with a shortening of the fast pathway ERP from 334 ± 35 msec to 300 ± 62 msec (P < 0.01), while the fast pathway ERP did not change significantly in patients with residual slow pathway function (291 ± 29 msec vs 303 ± 38 msec, respectively; P = 0.08). A shortening of 30 msec or more in the fast pathway ERP was observed in 11 of 13 patients who did not have residual slow pathway function, compared to 0 of 7 patients with residual slow pathway function (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Shortening of the fast pathway ERP after successful ablation of AVNRT is dependent upon complete loss of slow pathway function. This observation is consistent with electrotonic inhibition of the fast pathway by the slow pathway.     

Unmasking of fast and slow atrioventricular nodal pathways by successful radiofrequency ablation of two accessory atrioventricular connections

Electrophysiologic findings suggesting the coexistence of dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathways and accessory AV connections have been previously described. Anterograde conduction through the accessory pathway (AP) may preclude the diagnosis of AV nodal dual pathway physiology during atrial stimulation. This study reports on a patient with manifest Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome with clinically documented paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, in whom dual AV nodal pathways were unmasked after successful radiofrequency ablation of two accessory AV connections. In spite of detailed investigation, fast and slow AV nodal pathways were not detected in the first electrophysiologic study 8 years before ablation, nor were they detected during preablation study because of exclusive anomalous anterograde conduction. The anterograde AP effective refractory period was shorter than that of the fast and slow AV nodal pathways, and was limited by atrial refractoriness at 190 ms. The present findings strongly suggest the necessity for a careful postablation electrophysiologic study before and after isoproterenol administration with specific evaluation of AV nodal conduction. This is the first documented report on the finding of AV nodal dual pathway physiology and reentry after successful radiofrequency ablation of two APs. This finding may be of great therapeutic significance in light of the feasibility of slow pathway ablation also during a single session, had AV nodal reentry been induced in a sustained manner after ablation of the AP to prevent late recurrence of tachycardia.     

经导管射频消融改良房室结治疗房室结折返性心动过速

报道24例病人经射频消融(RFCA)慢径改良房室结治疗房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)的研究结果。RFCA后24例病人均不再诱发AVNRT(100％),其中23例慢径传导消失(95.8％),1例慢径传导明显减慢(4.2％)。认为RFCA改良慢径对房室和室房传导没有明显影响,其消融成功的可能预测指标为:X线影象消融电极位于房室结后下部、消融电极图A/V<0.4,放电出现交界性早搏或并行性交界性心律。     

Persistence of Single Echo Beat Inducibility After Selective Ablation of the Slow Pathway in Patients with Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia:

Residual Slow Pathway Conduction Effects on AVN Function. Introduction : Residual slow pathway conduction with or without reentrant echo beats has been reported in 25% to 30% of patients undergoing ablation for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT).
Methods and Results : Fifty-eight consecutive patients (aged 45 ± 12 years) with slow-fast AVNRT underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway (SP). Residual slow-fast echo beat was documented in 21 (36%) of 58 patients (group A). The pre-and postablation AH intervals triggering the echo beats were similar (346 ± 8 msec vs 352 ± 6 msec, P = NS), as were the pre-and postablation echo zones (55 ± 6 msec vs 52 ± 5 msec, P = NS) and functional refractory period of the SP. A consistent prolongation of the AV nodal effective refractory period (AVN-ERP; from 265 ± 28 msec to 340 ± 50 msec, P < 0.001) and the Wenckebach cycle length (WBCL; from 298 ± 41 msec to 438 ± 43 msec, P < 0.001) was observed in all patients with abolition of SP conduction (group B). In group A patients, the prolongation of WBCL was less (285 ± 33 msec preablation, and 334 ± 41 msec postablation, P < 0.001). Additional pulses abolished the residual echo in 16 of 21 patients, and further prolongation of the AVN-ERP and WBCL comparable to those found in patients without a residual echo beat was observed. During 19 ± 8 months follow-up, no patient had clinical recurrence of AVNRT.
Conclusion : Residual single echo beat after SP ablation for AVNRT reflects the persistence of some portion of the SP with unchanged functional conduction properties whose prognostic significance is uncertain. A consistent increase of WBCL can be a reliable marker of complete abolition of slow pathway conduction and termination of AVNRT.     

Adenosine-Sensitive Atrial Reentrant Tachycardia Originating from the Atrioventricular Nodal Transitional Area

Adenosine-Sensitive AT from AVN Area. Introduction : Atrial tachycardia shows wide variations in its electrophysiologic properties and sites of origin. We report an atrial tachycardia with ECG manifestations and electrophysiologic characteristics similar to an atypical form of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT).
Methods and Results : This supraventricular tachycardia was observed in 11 patients. It was initiated by atrial extrastimulation with an inverse relationship between the coupling interval of an extrastimulus and the postextrastimulus interval. Its induction was not related to a jump in the AH interval, and its perpetuation was independent of conduction block in the AV node. Ventricular pacing during tachycardia demonstrated AV dissociation without affecting the atrial cycle length. A very small dose of adenosine triphosphate (mean 3.9 ± 1.2 mg) could terminate the tachycardia. The earliest atrial activation during tachycardia was recorded at the low anteroseptal right atrium with a different intra-atrial activation sequence from that recorded during ventricular pacing, where the tachycardia was successfully ablated in 9 of 10 attempted patients. Bidirectional AV nodal conduction remained unatttched after successful ablation.
Conclusion : There may he an entity of adenosine-sensitive atrial tachycardia probably due to focal reentry within the AV node or its transitional tissues without involvement of the AV nodal pathways. This tachycardia can he ablated without disturbing AV nodal conduction from the right atrial septum.     

Atrioventricular Node Reentrant Tachycardia in Patients With a Prolonged AH Interval During Sinus Rhythm: Clinical Features, Electrophysiologic Characteristics and Results of Radiofrequency Ablation

Among a consecutive series of 600 patients who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation for AV node reentrant tachycardia, 14 patients (age 29-76 years) had a prolonged AH interval during sinus rhythm (172±18 ms, range 140 to 200). Seven of them had unsuccessful ablation during the previous ablation sessions. Eight patients with anterograde dual AV node pathway physiology received anterograde slow pathway ablation, and the other 6 patients without dual-pathway physiology received retrograde fast pathway ablation. All patients had successful elimination of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia after a mean of 4±4 radiofrequency applications, power level 36±6 watts and a pulse duration of 42±4 seconds. The postablation AH interval remained unchanged. During a follow-up period of 25±13 months, one patient who received slow pathway ablation developed 2:1 AV block with syncope. As compared with the other 586 patients without a prolonged AH interval, these 14 patients had significantly poorer anterograde AV nodal function and lower incidence of anterograde dual AV node physiology (P<0.01). We concluded that slow pathway ablation in patients with dual pathway physiology, and retrograde fast pathway ablation in patients without dual pathway physiology were effective and safe in patients with a prolonged AH interval. However, delayed onset of symptomatic AV block is possible and careful follow-up is necessary.     

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children: effect of slow pathway ablation on fast pathway function

INTRODUCTION: Prior studies in adults have shown significant shortening of the fast pathway effective refractory period after successful slow pathway ablation. As differences between adults and children exist in other characteristics of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), we sought to characterize the effect of slow pathway ablation or modification in a multicenter study of pediatric patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from procedures in pediatric patients were gathered retrospectively from five institutions. Entry criteria were age <21 years, typical AVNRT inducible with/without isoproterenol infusion, and attempted slow pathway ablation or modification. Dual AV nodal pathways were defined as those with > or =50 msec jump in A2-H2 with a 10-msec decrease in A1-A2. Successful ablation was defined as elimination of AVNRT inducibility. A total of 159 patients (age 4.4 to 21 years, mean 13.1) were studied and had attempted slow pathway ablation. AVNRT was inducible in the baseline state in 74 (47%) of 159 patients and with isoproterenol in the remainder. Dual AV nodal pathways were noted in 98 (62%) of 159 patients in the baseline state. Ablation was successful in 154 (97%) of 159 patients. In patients with dual AV nodal pathways and successful slow pathway ablation, the mean fast pathway effective refractory period was 343+/-68 msec before ablation and 263+/-64 msec after ablation. Mean decrease in the fast pathway effective refractory period was 81+/-82 msec (P < 0.0001) and was not explained by changes in autonomic tone, as measured by changes in sinus cycle length during the ablation procedure. Electrophysiologic measurements were correlated with age. Fast pathway effective refractory period was related to age both before (P = 0.0044) and after ablation (P < 0.0001). AV block cycle length was related to age both before (P = 0.0005) and after ablation (P < 0.0001). However, in dual AV nodal pathway patients, the magnitude of change in the fast pathway effective refractory period after ablation was not related to age. CONCLUSION: Lack of clear dual AV node physiology is common in pediatric patients with inducible AVNRT (38%). Fast pathway effective refractory period shortens substantially in response to slow pathway ablation. The magnitude of change is large compared with adult reports and is not completely explained by changes in autonomic tone. Prospective studies in children using autonomic blockade are needed.     

Need for Fast Pathway Ablation in Typical Irregular AV Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia in a Patient with Multiple AV Nodal Pathways

A case of a 60-year-old male with irregular AV nodal reentrant tachycardia of the common type is reported. Electrophysiological study revealed multiple antegrade slowly conducting AV nodal pathways and one exclusively retrogradely conducting fast AV nodal pathway. Despite the recommendation for slow pathway ablation as the treatment of choice in patients with AVNRT, first pathway ablation was successfully performed in this case due to the risk of total A V block of ablating the slow pathways. The present report shows that there is the rare patient in whom fast pathway ablation is required for curative treatment of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia.     

Differential Effects of Atropine and Isoproterenol on Inducibility of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Background: Radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) relies on tachycardia non-inducibility after ablation as success criterion. However, AVNRT is frequently non-inducible at baseline. Thus, autonomic enhancement using either atropine or isoproterenol is frequently used for arrhythmia induction before ablation. Methods: 80 patients (57 women, 23 men, age 50±14 years) undergoing slow pathway ablation for recurrent AVNRT were randomized to receive either 0.01mg/kg atropine or 0.5-1.0g/kg/min isoproterenol before ablation after baseline assessment of AV conduction. The effects of either drug on ante- and retrograde conduction was assessed by measuring sinus cycle length, PR and AH interval, antegrade and retrograde Wenckebach cycle length (WBCL), antegrade effective refractory period (ERP) of slow and fast pathway and maximal stimulus-to-H interval during slow and fast pathway conduction. Results: Inducibility of AVNRT at baseline was not different between patients randomized to atropine (73%) and isoproterenol (58%) but was reduced after atropine (45%) compared to isoproterenol (93%, P<0.001). Of the 28 patients non-inducible at baseline isoproterenol rendered AVNRT inducible in 21, atropine in 4 patients. Dual AV nodal pathway physiology was present in 88% before and 50% after atropine compared to 83% before and 73% after isoproterenol. Whereas both drugs exerted similar effects on ante- and retrograde fast pathway conduction maximal SH interval during slow pathway conduction was significantly shorter after isoproterenol (300±48ms vs. 374±113ms, P=0.012). Conclusion: Isoproterenol yields higher AVNRT inducibility than atropine in patients non-inducible at baseline. This may be caused by a more pronounced effect on antegrade slow pathway conduction.     

Left-septal ablation of the fast pathway in AV nodal reentrant tachycardia refractory to right septal ablation.

In more than 95% of patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), curative treatment can be achieved with selective ablation of the slow pathway in the right-sided septum. We report a patient with typical AVNRT who had failed attempts to perform conventional right septal ablation of the slow as well as of the fast pathway and finally underwent successful ablation of the fast pathway on the left side of the interatrial septum using a transseptal approach.     

Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of the Anterosuperior and Posteroinferior Atrial Approaches to the AV Node for Treatment of AV Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Catheter Ablation Techniques in AVNRT. Radiofrequency catheter ablation has been established as a first-line curative treatment modality in patients with symptomatic AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). The successful sites of stepwise catheter ablation approaches of the so-called fast and slow pathways strongly suggest that AVNRT involves the atrial approaches to the AV node. The typical fast pathway ablation sites are located anterosuperior toward the apex of the triangle of Koch, which also contains the compact AV node, whereas the usual slow pathway ablation sites are located posteroinferior toward the base of the triangle of Koch at a greater distance to the compact AV node and bundle of His. Accordingly, ablation studies with large patient cohorts have demonstrated that fast pathway ablation carries a higher risk of inadvertent complete AV block. Thus, the slow pathway is clearly the primary target site, and fast pathway ablation is rarely necessary. Different approaches for slow pathway ablation have been elaborated: anatomically oriented stepwise techniques, ablation guided by double potentials recorded within the area of the slow pathway insertion, and combined techniques. The modern concept of AVNRT suggests that this arrhythmia involves the highly complex three-dimensional nonuniform anisotropic AV junctional area. Accordingly, mapping and ablation studies demonstrated that the anterior approach is not identical with fast pathway ablation, and the posterior approach is not identical with slow pathway ablation. Therefore, it is essential for interventional electrophysiologists to familiarize themsdves with the anatomic and electrophysiologic details of this complex and variable specialized AV junctional region. In this review, the anatomic and pathophysiologic aspects of the AV junctional area as they relate to interventional therapy are summarized briefly, and the catheter techniques for ablation of the so-called fast and slow AV nodal pathways for the treatment of AVNRT are described.     

The Electrophysiologic Characteristics in Patients with Only Ventricular-Pacing Inducible Slow–Fast Form Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Background: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) can be usually induced by atrial pacing or extrastimulation. However, it is less commonly induced only by ventricular pacing or extrastimulation. Objective: The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the electrophysiologic characteristics in patients with slow–fast form AVNRT that could be induced only by ventricular pacing or extrastimulation. Methods: The total population was 1497 patients associated with AVNRT. There were 1373 (91.7%) patients who had slow–fast form AVNRT included in our study. Group 1 (n = 45) could be induced only by ventricular pacing or extrastimulation, and Group 2 (n = 1328) could be induced by only atrial stimulation or both atrial and ventricular stimulation. The electrophysiologic characteristics of the group 1 and group 2 patients were compared. Results: Group 1 patients had a significantly lower incidence of both antegrade and retrograde dual AV nodal pathways. The pacing cycle length (CL) of the antegrade 1:1 fast pathway (FP) and antegrade ERP of the FP were both significantly shorter in Group 1 patients. Mean antegrade FRP of the fast and slow pathways were significantly shorter in Group 1 patients. The differences of pacing CL of 1:1 antegrade conduction, antegrade ERP and FRP were much longer in Group 2 patients. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the patients with slow–fast form AVNRT that could be induced only by ventricular stimulation had a lower incidence of dual AV nodal pathways and the different electrophysiologic characteristics (shorter pacing CL of the antegrade 1:1 FP, antegrade ERP of the FP and the differences of pacing CL of 1:1 antegrade conduction, antegrade ERP and FRP) from the other patients. The specific electrophysiologic characteristics in such patients could be the reason that could be induced only by ventricular stimulation.     

Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardia in Patients with Sinus Node Dysfunction: Electrophysiologic Characteristics, Clinical Presentation, and Results of Slow Pathway Ablation

AVNRT and Sinus Node Dysfunction. Introduction: Sinus node dysfunction (SND) is frequently associated with impaired AV conduction. This study investigated the electrophysiologic properties of dual AV nodal pathways in patients suffering from both SND and AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Methods and Results: Two groups of patients with slow-fast AVNRT underwent invasive electrophysiologic testing and catheter ablation of the slow pathway. Group A comprised 10 patients with SND (age 70 ± 8 years), (Group B included 10 age-matched patients without SND (age 69 ± 7 years; P = NS) who served as controls. Patients of group A exhibited prolongation of the anterograde Wenckebach cycle lengths (WBCLs) of both the fast pathway (559 ± 96 vs 361 ± 38 msec; P < 0.01) and the slow pathway (409 ± 57 vs 339 ± 32 ms; P < 0.01). However, the delta between the WBCLs of the fast and the slow pathways was larger in patients of group A (150 ± 80 vs 22 ± 20 msec; P < 0.01). Retrograde fast pathway conduction was well preserved with no difference in WBCLs (356 ± 42 vs 330 ± 47 msec; P = NS). Cycle lengths of AVNRT were longer in group A (468 ± 46 vs 363 ± 37 msec; P < 0.01). Clinically, all patients of group A suffered from multiple episodes of AVNRT per week, which was not the case in any patient of group B (P < 0.01). Catheter ablation of the slow pathway eliminated AVNRT in all patients without complications. Conclusions: Patients with AVNRT and SND exhibit characteristic electrophysiologic alterations of both AV nodal pathways. Clinically, this results in significantly more frequent episodes of tachycardia. Slow pathway ablation appears to be safe and effective in these patients.     

Concealed conduction and dual pathway physiology of the atrioventricular node

INTRODUCTION: Both concealed conduction and dual pathway physiology are important electrophysiologic characteristics of the AV node. The interaction of AV nodal concealment and duality, however, is not clearly understood. METHODS AND RESULTS: The properties of AV conduction curves in the presence and absence of a conditioning blocked impulse were prospectively studied during premature atrial stimulation in 20 patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia before and after slow pathway ablation and in 14 control patients. AV nodal duality in the control conduction curve in the absence of a conditioning impulse was observed in 19 (95%) of 20 patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. However, AV nodal duality in the modulated conduction curve in the presence of a blocked impulse was only identified in 2 (10%) of 20 patients (2/20 vs 19/20, P < 0.0001). The modulated curve was characterized by a significantly longer AV nodal effective and functional refractory periods compared to the control curve (P < 0.0001) in both patients with and without AV nodal reentry and in AV nodal reentry patients after successful slow pathway ablation. The maximum AH interval (AH(max)) of the modulated curve was significantly shorter than the control curve in both patients with (217 +/- 74 ms vs 347 +/- 55 ms, P < 0.0001) and without AV nodal reentry (178 +/- 50 ms vs 214 +/- 54 ms, P = 0.02). AH(max) of the control curve was significantly longer in AV nodal reentry patients than in controls (P < 0.0001). AH(max) of the modulated curve, however, was not significantly different between the two groups. After slow pathway ablation, AH(max) of the control curve was significantly reduced (347 +/- 55 ms vs 191 +/- 40 ms, P < 0.0001). Significant reduction in AH(max) of the modulated curve was not observed. CONCLUSION: An interaction of AV nodal concealed conduction and dual pathway physiology was demonstrated by our data. Slow pathway conduction of the AV node was prevented by the concealed beat in both patients with and without AV nodal reentry.     

从慢径消融发生的交界区心律试探房室结双径的本质

７６例慢－快型房室结折返性心动过速（ＡＶＮＲＴ）患者接受房室结慢径消融术。６５例慢径阻断、９例双径存在但ＡＶＮＲＴ不能诱发、２例快径阻断。慢径阻断后，除快径的前传有效不应期（ＥＲＰ）缩短（２８７．０±７９．０ｍｓｖｓ３４４．０±８７．０ｍｓ，Ｐ＜０．０１）外，房室传导的文氏点、２１阻滞点、室房传导的１１点、快径逆传ＥＲＰ、前传和逆传功能不应期均无明显改变。共放电８４１次，其中无交界区心律的３１７次放电，无一次消融成功。６５例慢径阻断者，交界区心律减少或消失。以上结果提示快径和慢径可能是两条各具电生理特性的传导纤维。     

特殊类型房室结折返性心动过速的电生理机制及其射频消融

报道２例特殊类型的房室结折返性心动过速（ＡＶＮＲＴ），１例为慢－慢型ＡＶＮＲＴ伴起始部多径路逆传；１例为两种不同电生理特性的慢径交替前传、快径逆传构成的ＡＶＮＲＴ。电生理检查均提示房室结三径路。２例病人均于冠状静脉窦口上方消融慢径改良房室结成功，心动过速不再被诱发。随访２个月心动过速均无复发。提示房室结多径路形成的特殊类型ＡＶＮＲＴ，需详细的电生理检查并仔细鉴别方能予以诊断。射频导管消融方法同典型ＡＶＮ－ＲＴ，且安全、有效。     

Dependence of electrogram duration in right posteroseptal atrium and atrium-pulmonary vein junction on pacing site: mechanism and implications regarding atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION: The fractionated atrial electrogram, a signal helpful in identifying the target site for radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway, is considered to arise from nonuniform anisotropic electrical activity. However, the effects of pacing sites and radiofrequency ablation on these electrograms are not clear. Similarly, the nature of the fractionated atrial electrogram in the atrium-pulmonary vein junction has yet to be determined. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two experiments were performed in this study. Experiment 1 evaluated the fractionated atrial electrogram at target sites before and after slow AV nodal pathway ablation during sinus rhythm or during pacing from different sites. Group 1A consisted of 16 patients with dual AV nodal pathway physiology and AV nodal reentrant tachycardia who underwent successful ablation without residual slow AV nodal pathway. Group 1B consisted of 7 patients who underwent successful elimination of AV nodal reentry but with residual dual AV nodal pathway physiology. Group 1C consisted of 6 patients who still had AV nodal reentrant tachycardia after two applications of radiofrequency energy. In group 1D, there were 16 patients with dual AV nodal pathway physiology, but without inducible AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. In group 1E, there were 15 patients without dual AV nodal pathway physiology. Experiment 2 investigated the fractionated atrial electrogram in the ostium of the left and right superior pulmonary veins in 18 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (2A) and in 8 patients without paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (2B). Before radiofrequency ablation, electrogram duration in the right posteroseptal atrium during pacing from the middle coronary sinus or the right posterolateral atrium was shorter than that during pacing from the high right atrium (HRA) in all group 1 patients. After the successful elimination of the slow AV nodal pathway conduction in group 1A, atrial electrogram duration during HRA pacing was shorter than that before ablation. In experiment 2 patients, electrogram duration during pacing from the proximal or distal coronary sinus was shorter than that during pacing from HRA or sinus rhythm. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the fractionated atrial electrograms in the right posteroseptal atrium and ostium of left or right superior pulmonary veins are potentially consistent with nonuniform anisotropic propagation. Alternations of electrogram characteristics after successful radiofrequency ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway may arise from the changes of nonuniform anisotropic activity in the right posteroseptal atrium.     

Electrophysiologic Characteristics and Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Atrioventricular Node Reentrant Tachycardia with Second-Degree Atrioventricular Block

Second-Degree AV Block During AVNRT. Introduction : Detailed electrophysiologic study of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with 2:1 AV block has been limited.
Methods and Results : Six hundred nine consecutive patients with AVNRT underwent electrophysiologic study and radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow pathway. Twenty-six patients with 2:1 AV block during AVNRT were designated as group I, und those without this particular finding were designated as group II. The major findings of the present study were: (1) group I patients had better anterograde and retrograde AV nodal function, shorter tachycardia cycle length (during tachycardia with 1:1 conduction) (307 ± 30 vs 360 ± 58 msec, P < 0.001), and higher incidence of transient bundle branch block during tachycardia (18/26 vs 43/609, P < 0.001) than group II patients: (2) 21 (80.8%) group I patients had alternans of AA intervals during AVNRT with 2:1 AV block. Longer AH intervals (264 ± 26 vs 253 ± 27 msec, P = 0.031) were associated with the blocked beats. However, similar HA intervals (51 ± 12 vs 50 ± 12 msec, P = 0.363) and similar HV intervals (53 ± 11 vs 52 ± 12, P = 0.834) were found in the blocked and conducted beats; (3) ventricular extrastimulation before or during the His-bundle refractory period bundle could convert 2:1 AV block to 1:1 AV conduction.
Conclusions : Fast reentrant circuit, rather than underlying impaired conduction of the distal AV node or infranodal area, might account for second-degree AV block during AVNRT. Slow pathway ablation is safe and effective in patients who have AVNRT with 2:1 AV block.