Enantioselective pharmacokinetics of tramadol in CYP2D6 extensive and poor metabolizers

Objective To describe in detail the intravenous, single oral and multiple oral dose enantioselective pharmacokinetics of tramadol in CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (EMs) and poor metabolizers (PMs).Methods Eight EMs and eight PMs conducted three phases as an open-label cross-over trial with different formulations; 150 mg single oral tramadol hydrochloride, 50 mg single oral tramadol hydrochloride every 8 h for 48 h (steady state), 100 mg intravenous tramadol hydrochloride. Urine and plasma concentrations of (+/−)-tramadol and (+/−)-M1 were determined for 48 h after administration.Results In all three phases, there were significant differences between EMs and PMs in AUC and t_1/2 of (+)-tramadol (P≤0.0015), (−)-tramadol (P≤0.0062), (+)-M1 (P≤0.0198) and (−)-M1 (P≤0.0370), and significant differences in C_max of (+)-M1 (P<0.0001) and (−)-M1 (P≤0.0010). In Phase A and C, significant differences in t_max were seen for (+)-M1 (P≤0.0200). There were no statistical differences between the absolute bioavailability of tramadol in EMs and PMs. The urinary recoveries of (+)-tramadol, (−)-tramadol, (+)-M1 and (−)-M1 were statistically significantly different in EMs and PMs (P<0.05). Median antimodes of the urinary metabolic ratios of (+)-tramadol / (+)-M1 and (−)-M1 were 5.0 and 1.5, respectively, hereby clearly separating EMs and PMs in all three phases.Conclusion The impact of CYP2D6 phenotype on tramadol pharmacokinetics was similar after single oral, multiple oral and intravenous administration displaying significant pharmacokinetic differences between EMs and PMs of (+)-tramadol, (−)-tramadol, -(+)-M1 and (−)-M1. The O-demethylation of tramadol was catalysed stereospecific by CYP2D6 in the way that very little (+)-M1 was produced in PMs.     

Single-dose pharmacokinetics of methylphenidate in CYP2D6 extensive and poor metabolizers

Six adults phenotyped as either extensive (N = 4) or poor (N = 2) metabolizers for cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 were given a 10-mg oral dose of methylphenidate (MPH) on two separate occasions with and without quinidine, a potent CYP2D6 inhibitor. Quinidine had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of either MPH or ritalinic acid, its major metabolite, in either group of CYP2D6 metabolizers. These data suggest a lack of involvement of CYP2D6 in the metabolism of MPH. Drugs that are inhibitors of CYP2D6 when taken concurrently with MPH should not affect its plasma concentration.     

Lack of effect of aprepitant on hydrodolasetron pharmacokinetics in CYP2D6 extensive and poor metabolizers

To prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, aprepitant is given with a corticosteroid and a 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 antagonist, such as dolasetron. Dolasetron is converted to the active metabolite hydrodolasetron, which is cleared largely via CYP2D6. The authors determined whether aprepitant, a moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor, alters hydrodolasetron pharmacokinetics in CYP2D6 poor and extensive metabolizers. Six CYP2D6 poor and 6 extensive metabolizers were randomized in an open-label, crossover fashion to treatment A (dolasetron 100 mg on day 1) and treatment B (dolasetron 100 mg plus aprepitant 125 mg on day 1, aprepitant 80 mg on days 2-3). For hydrodolasetron area under the concentration-versus-time curve (AUC0-infinity) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax), geometric mean ratios (B/A) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) fell below the predefined limit (2.0) for clinical significance (AUC0-infinity, 1.09 [90% CI, 1.01-1.18], Cmax, 1.08 [90% CI, 0.94-1.24]). Aprepitant did not affect the pharmacokinetics of hydrodolasetron, regardless of CYP2D6 metabolizer type, and was generally well tolerated when coadministered with dolasetron in volunteers.     

Consequences of rifampicin treatment on propafenone disposition in extensive and poor metabolizers of CYP2D6

Propafenone undergoes extensive metabolism both by phase I and phase II enzymes: cytochrome P4502D6 (CYP2D6) dependent polymorphic hydroxylation to its main metabolite 5-OH-propafenone, CYP3A4/1A2 dependent N-dealkylation and further glucuronidation and sulfation. Since CYP2D6 is not inducible by rifampicin, an important drug interaction between rifampicin and propafenone is not to be expected a priori. However, non-CYP2D6-dependent pathways may be induced as a case report described dramatically lowered plasma concentrations of propafenone with loss of dysrhythmia control associated with rifampicin treatment. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate induction properties of rifampicin on propafenone disposition in extensive metabolizers and poor metabolizers of CYP2D6. Six extensive metabolizers and six poor metabolizers ingested 600 mg rifampicin once daily for nine consecutive days. The day before the first rifampicin dose and on the day of the last rifampicin dose each individual received a single intravenous (i.v.) infusion of 140 mg unlabelled propafenone and 2 h later a single dose of 300 mg deuterated propafenone orally (p.o.). During enzyme induction maximum QRS prolongation decreased significantly after propafenone p.o. (21 +/- 7% versus 13 +/- 6% in extensive metabolizers, P < 0.01; 15 +/- 6% versus 9 +/- 6% in poor metabolizers, P < 0.01) and not after propafenone i.v. In parallel, there were no substantial differences in pharmacokinetics of propafenone i.v. by rifampicin. However, bioavailability of propafenone dropped from 30 +/- 15% to 10 +/- 8% in extensive metabolizers (P < 0.01) and from 81 +/- 6% to 48 +/- 8% in poor metabolizers (P < 0.001). Following propafenone p.o. clearances through N-dealkylation (4.1 +/- 2.1 ml/min versus 23.5 +/- 12.6 ml/min in extensive metabolizers, P < 0.01; 3.4 +/- 1.3 ml/min versus 16.0 +/- 5.5 ml/min in poor metabolizers, P < 0.001) and glucuronidation (123 +/- 48 ml/min versus 457 +/- 267 ml/min in extensive metabolizers, P < 0.05; 43 +/- 9 ml/min versus 112 +/- 34 ml/min in poor metabolizers, P < 0.01), but not 5-hydroxylation increased regardless of phenotype indicating substantial enzyme induction. Clearances to propafenone sulfate and conjugates of 5-OH-propafenone were significantly enhanced by rifampicin treatment in poor metabolizers (P < 0.01). Thus, induction of both phase I pathways (CYP3A4/1A2) and phase II pathways (glucuronidation, sulfation) of propafenone by rifampicin resulted in a clinically relevant metabolic drug interaction which was more pronounced in extensive metabolizers than in poor metabolizers with regard to percentage decrease in bioavailability of propafenone.     

Steady-state pharmacokinetics of the enantiomers of perhexiline in CYP2D6 poor and extensive metabolizers administered Rac-perhexiline

Aims

To determine the steady-state pharmacokinetics of perhexiline (PHX) enantiomers over one interdosing interval in CYP2D6 extensive and poor metabolizer (EM and PM, respectively) patients administered rac-PHX. To elucidate the processes responsible for enantioselectivity, particularly in PM patients.

Methods

Blood samples were taken over one interdosing interval from six EM and two PM patients at steady-state with respect to rac-PHX metabolism. Complete urine collections were taken from five EM patients. PHX concentrations in plasma and urine were determined with enantioselective high-performance liquid chromatography methods.

Results

EM patients had 16- and 10-fold greater median apparent oral clearances of (+)- and (−)-PHX, respectively, than PM patients (P < 0.05 for both) and required significantly larger doses of rac-PHX (69 vs. 4.2 µg kg⁻¹ h⁻¹, P < 0.05) to maintain therapeutic concentrations in plasma. Patient phenotypes were consistent with CYP2D6 genotypes. Both groups displayed enantioselective pharmacokinetics, with higher apparent oral clearances for (−)-PHX compared with (+)-PHX, although PM patients exhibited significantly greater enantioselectivity (P < 0.05). The renal clearance of PHX enantiomers was not enantioselective and accounted for <1% of the median apparent oral clearance of each enantiomer in EM patients. Assuming the same renal clearances for PM patients accounts for approximately 9 and 4% of their median apparent oral clearances of (+)- and (−)-PHX, respectively.

Conclusions

The enantioselective pharmacokinetics of PHX are primarily due to metabolism by CYP2D6 in EM patients. The mechanism responsible for the enantioselective pharmacokinetics of PHX in PM patients is unknown, but may be due to enantioselective biliary or intestinal excretion.

What is already known about this subject

• Perhexiline (PHX) is administered as a racemic mixture and exhibits enantioselective pharmacokinetics in both poor and extensive metabolizers of CYP2D6 (PM and EM, respectively).
• Extensive metabolism by CYP2D6 is primarily responsible for the observed enantioselectivity in EM, but the process responsible in PM is unknown.
• Analysis of the steady-state plasma concentration–time profiles of the enantiomers of PHX in PM and EM was undertaken in order to elucidate the observed enantioselectivity, particularly with respect to PM.

What this study adds

• This is the first study to examine the steady-state plasma concentration–time profiles of the enantiomers of PHX in EM and PM over the course of an interdosing interval.
• The apparent oral clearance of each enantiomer was calculated from their respective AUC rather than from trough concentrations and was enantioselective in both phenotypes, with higher apparent oral clearances of (−)-than (+)-PHX.
• Renal clearance, calculated for EM and subsequently assumed for PM, constitutes a greater proportion of the total apparent oral clearance of each enantiomer in PM than EM, but was not enantioselective and thus unable to explain the enantioselectivity observed in PM.

     

Paroxetine increases steady-state concentrations of (R)-methadone in CYP2D6 extensive but not poor metabolizers

Steady-state blood concentrations of (R)- methadone (i.e., the active form), (S)-methadone, and (R,S)-methadone were measured before and after introduction of paroxetine 20 mg/day during a mean period of 12 days in 10 addict patients in methadone maintenance treatment. Eight patients were genotyped as CYP2D6 homozygous extensive metabolizers (EMs) and two patients as poor metabolizers (PMs). Paroxetine significantly increased concentrations of both enantiomers of methadone in the whole group (mean increase for (R)-methadone +/- SD, 26 +/- 32%; range, -14% to +83%, p = 0.032; for (S)-methadone, 49 +/- 51%; range, -29% to +137%, p = 0.028; for (R,S)-methadone, 35 +/- 41%; range, -20% to +112%, p = 0.032) and in the group of eight EMs (mean increase, 32%, p = 0.036; 53%, p = 0.028; and 42%, p = 0.036, for (R)-methadone, (S)-methadone, and (R,S)-methadone, respectively). On the other hand, in the two PMs, (S)-methadone but not (R)-methadone concentrations were increased by paroxetine (mean increases of 36% and 3%, respectively). Paroxetine is a strong CYP2D6 inhibitor, and these results confirm previous studies showing an involvement of CYP2D6 in methadone metabolism with a stereoselectivity toward the (R)-enantiomer. Because paroxetine is a mild inhibitor of CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4, increase of (S)-methadone concentrations in both EMs and PMs could be mediated by inhibition of any of these isozymes.     

CYP2D6 phenotyping with dextromethorphan

Genetically determined individual differences in the ability to oxidize certain drugs have raised recently a considerable interest because of clinical importance of this problem. Determination of CYP2D6 oxidation phenotype is used to obtain more efficient pharmacotherapy and to explain lower efficacy of some drugs and presentation of adverse effects in particular patients. The aim of this study was to identify the CYP2D6 oxidation phenotype with dextromethorphan (DM) as a probe drug. The study included 85 healthy volunteers of Polish origin. DM (40 mg) was given orally to healthy adults and 10-h urine samples were collected. DM and the metabolite dextrorphan (DX) were analyzed by the HPLC method. Phenotyping was performed using the metabolic ratio (MR) calculated as the urinary DM/DX output. Based on the metabolic ratio, we can distinguish extensive (EM) and poor (PM) metabolizers in human population. Individuals with a dextromethorphan MR greater than 0.3 (log > -0.5) were classified as PMs. In our study, the frequency of the PM phenotype was 9.4%, which is in the range found in other Caucasian populations (3-10%).     

Effects of atomoxetine on the QT interval in healthy CYP2D6 poor metabolizers

Aim

The effects of atomoxetine (20 and 60 mg twice daily), 400 mg moxifloxacin and placebo on QT_c in 131 healthy CYP2D6 poor metabolizer males were compared.

Methods

Atomoxetine doses were selected to result in plasma concentrations that approximated expected plasma concentrations at both the maximum recommended dose and at a supratherapeutic dose in CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers. Ten second electrocardiograms were obtained for time-matched baseline on days −2 and −1, three time points after dosing on day 1 for moxifloxacin and five time points on day 7 for atomoxetine and placebo. Maximum mean placebo-subtracted change from baseline model-corrected QT (QT_cM) on day 7 was the primary endpoint.

Results

QT_cM differences for atomoxetine 20 and 60 mg twice daily were 0.5 ms (upper bound of the one-sided 95% confidence interval 2.2 ms) and 4.2 ms (upper bound of the one-sided 95% confidence interval 6.0 ms), respectively. As plasma concentration of atomoxetine increased, a statistically significant increase in QT_c was observed. The moxifloxacin difference from placebo met the a priori definition of non-inferiority. Maximum mean placebo-subtracted change from baseline QT_cM for moxifloxacin was 4.8 ms and this difference was statistically significant. Moxifloxacin plasma concentrations were below the concentrations expected from the literature. However, the slope of the plasma concentration−QT_c change observed was consistent with the literature.

Conclusion

Atomoxetine was not associated with a clinically significant change in QT_c. However, a statistically significant increase in QT_c was associated with increasing plasma concentrations.     

The effects of concomitant administration of theophylline and toborinone on the pharmacokinetics of both compounds in poor and extensive metabolizers via CYP2D6

This study investigated the effects of the concomitant administration of theophylline and toborinone on the pharmacokinetics of both compounds in poor and extensive metabolizers via CYP2D6. In period 1, a single dose of 3.5 mg/kg theophylline was administered orally. In period 2, a single dose of 1.0 microg/kg/min toborinone was infused over 6 hours. In period 3, 3.5 mg/kg theophylline was coadministered with 1.0 microg/kg/min toborinone. Serial blood and pooled urine samples were collected before and after toborinone administration for the quantification of toborinone and its metabolites in plasma and urine. Serial blood samples were collected before and after theophylline administration for the quantification of theophylline and its metabolites in plasma. No significant differences were observed in toborinone pharmacokinetics between poor and extensive metabolizers via CYP2D6. Toborinone coadministration with theophylline did not result in a substantive effect on the disposition of theophylline and vice versa.     

A rapid thin layer chromatographic procedure to identify poor and extensive oxidative drug metabolizers in man using dextromethorphan.

A rapid TLC method is presented to distinguish poor oxidative drug metabolizers from extensive oxidative drug metabolizers. Dextromethorphan (1) is used as test probe because it is safe, well characterized, generally available and easy to measure. The method is based on the extraction of 1 and its major oxidative metabolite dextrorphan (2) from urine, followed by separation on a TLC plate and visualized by a combined Marquis/Mandelin reaction. The intensities of the spots are then compared with a series of standard mixtures containing 1 and 2 in a ratio of 0.3 at different concentrations. This value represents the antimode that separates poor from extensive metabolizers, and an individual is identified as a poor metabolizer if the intensity ratio of the two spots from his urine sample is higher than 0.3. The proposed TLC method was cross checked with an HPLC method and found to correctly identify 9 poor metabolizers out of a population of 71 volunteers.     

The stereoselective metabolism of fluoxetine in poor and extensive metabolizers of sparteine

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine is administered as a racemic mixture, and R- and S-fluoxetine are metabolized in the liver by N-demethylation to R- and S-norfluoxetine, respectively. R- and S-fluoxetine and S-norfluoxetine are equally potent selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, but R-norfluoxetine is 20-fold less potent in this regard. Racemic fluoxetine and norfluoxetine are potent inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 in vivo and in vitro and recent studies in vivo have shown that racemic fluoxetine is metabolized by CYP2D6. The primary aim of the present study was to investigate the stereoselective metabolism of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine by CYP2D6 in vivo. A single oral dose of fluoxetine (60 mg) was administered to six poor and six extensive metabolizers of sparteine. Blood samples were collected during 6 weeks for poor metabolizers and 3 weeks for extensive metabolizers. Once a week a sparteine test was performed. The R- and S-enantiomers of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine were determined by a stereoselective gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy method. In the poor metabolizers, the oral clearance of R- and S-fluoxetine was 3.0 l/h and 17 l/h, respectively, the corresponding values in the extensive metabolizers were 36 l/h and 40 l/h, respectively. For both enantiomers, the phenotype difference was statistically significant. In poor metabolizers, the elimination half-lives were 6.9 days and 17.4 days for R- and S-norfluoxetine, respectively, and in the extensive metabolizers it was 5.5 days for both enantiomers, a significant phenotypical difference only for S-norfluoxetine. For fluoxetine the elimination half-lives were 9.5 and 6.1 days in poor metabolizers for the R- and S-enantiomer, respectively. The corresponding values in the extensive metabolizers were 2.6 and 1.1 days, respectively. Also for this parameter, the differences were statistically significant. This study shows that CYP2D6 catalyses the metabolism of R- and S-fluoxetine and most likely the further metabolism of S-norfluoxetine but not of R-norfluoxetine.     

The effect of CYP2D6 polymorphisms on dextromethorphan metabolism in Mexican Americans

CYP2D6 is one of the most polymorphic of the cytochrome P450 enzymes. Genetic differences in this enzyme have been reported in whites, blacks, and Asians. However, there is very little information about polymorphisms of this enzyme in Mexican Americans. The objectives of the present study were to assess the metabolic activity of CYP2D6 in a Mexican American population using dextromethorphan and to correlate this metabolic activity with a genotypic analysis. The sample consisted of 50 Mexican American subjects and 25 non-Mexican American controls. Overnight urine samples were collected and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography to calculate the metabolic ratio of dextromethorphan to dextrorphan. Blood samples were collected for genotypic analysis of CYP2D6 alleles. The frequency of the poor metabolizer phenotype was the same in the Mexican American group and the non-Mexican American group (6% vs 5.5%). The frequency of alleles in the Mexican American group was similar to frequencies published in other reports for non-Hispanic whites: *4 = 0.17, *5 = 0.02, *10 = 0.01, *17 = 0.02, *xN = 0.03. These results indicate that compared with non-Hispanic whites, Mexican Americans have a similar proportion of poor metabolizer phenotype and similar genetic polymorphisms of CYP2D6.     

3H]GBR 12935 binding in platelets from poor and extensive cytochrome P-4502D6 metabolizers

Previous studies have indicated that part of the binding of [3H] [1-[2-(diphenylmethoxy)ethyl]-4-(3-phenylpropyl) piperazine dihydrochloride] ([3H]GBR 12935) to human platelets is to a piperazine acceptor site, which might be associated with cytochrome P-450IID6 (CYP4502D6, debrisoquine-4-hydroxylase). Due to mutant CYP4502D6 alleles, 5-10% of Caucasians are poor metabolizers of CYP4502D6 substrates such as debrisoquine and dextromethorphan. In the present study, possible differences in binding characteristics of [3H]GBR 12935 in platelets from CYP4502D6 poor and extensive metabolizers were investigated. The most prominent finding was a gender difference, with males having significantly higher Kd values than females. There were no differences in Bmax. After correction for gender, there was a tendency towards higher Kd values in poor metabolizers than in extensive metabolizers, although the difference was not statistically significant. Whether this finding corresponds to reduced CYP4502D6 activity is a matter of further investigation.     

CYP2D6 status of extensive metabolizers after multiple-dose fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, or sertraline

The aim of this study was to evaluate the CYP2D6 inhibitory effects of four selective rerotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Thirty-one healthy subjects were phenotyped as extensive metabolizers using the dextromethorphan/dextrorphan (DM/DX) urinary ratio as a marker for CYP2D6 activity before and after 8 days of administration of fluoxetine 60 mg (loading dose strategy), fluvoxamine 100 mg, paroxetine 20 mg, or sertraline 100 mg in a parallel-group design. Statistical analysis was performed on log-transformed DM/DX ratios because of variability within and between treatment groups. DM/DX ratios before (DM/DX(BL)) and after (DM/DX(SSRI)) were compared within and between the four SSRI groups. DM/DX(BL) ratios were not significantly different between the four SSRI treatment groups. Comparing within groups, significant differences between DM/DX(BL) and DM/DX(SSRI) were found for the fluoxetine (p < 0.001; ratio values, 0.020 vs. 0.364) and paroxetine (p = 0.0005, ratio values 0.029 vs. 1.085) but not for the fluvoxamine or sertraline groups. Comparing between groups, significant differences in DM/DX(SSRI) ratios were found for fluoxetine versus sertraline (p = 0.0019, DM/DX = 0.364 vs. 0.057), fluoxetine versus fluvoxamine (p < 0.0001, DM/DX = 0.364 vs. 0.019), paroxetine versus sertraline (p = 0.0026, DM/DX = 1.085 vs. 0.057), and paroxetine versus fluvoxamine (p < 0.0001, DM/DX = 1.085 vs. 0.019). No significant differences were noted between the two potent CYP2D6 inhibitors, fluoxetine and paroxetine, or the two weakest inhibitors, fluvoxamine and sertraline. Five subjects in the fluoxetine and four subjects in the paroxetine groups changed to poor metabolizer phenotype (DM/DX > or = 0.3) after treatment. Although CYP2D6 inhibitory effects of fluvoxamine and sertraline did not yield significant differences from baseline, some subjects exhibited DM/DX ratio increases of 150 to 200%. One paroxetine-treated subject did not exhibit any CYP2D6 inhibition. SSRI dose and plasma concentration may be correlated with the extent of CYP2D6 inhibition and should be further investigated.     

Bioinformatics research on inter-racial difference in drug metabolism I. Analysis on frequencies of mutant alleles and poor metabolizers on CYP2D6 and CYP2C19

The enzyme activities of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 show a genetic polymorphism, and the frequency of poor metabolizers (PMs) on these enzymes depends on races. In the present study, the frequencies of mutant alleles and PMs in each race were analyzed based on information from published studies, considering the genetic polymorphisms of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 as the causal factors of racial and inter-individual differences in pharmacokinetics. As a result, it was shown that there were racial differences in the frequencies of each mutant allele and PMs. The frequencies of PMs on CYP2D6 are 1.9% of Asians and 7.7% of Caucasians, and those of PMs on CYP2C19 are 15.8% of Asians and 2.2% of Caucasians. Based on the results, it was suggested that there would be racial differences in the frequencies of PM subjects whose blood concentrations might be higher for drugs metabolized by these enzymes. Additionally, it was suggested that enzyme activities would vary according to the number of functional alleles even in subjects judged to be extensive metabolizers (EMs). In the bridging study, genetic information regarding CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 of the subjects will help extrapolate foreign clinical data to a domestic population.     

Pharmacokinetics of dextromethorphan after single or multiple dosing in combination with quinidine in extensive and poor metabolizers

Dextromethorphan (DM) pharmacological properties predict that the widely used cough suppressant could be used to treat several neuronal disorders, but it is rapidly metabolized after oral dosing. To find out whether quinidine (Q), a CYP2D6 inhibitor, could elevate and prolong DM plasma profiles, 2 multiple-dose studies identified the lowest oral dose of Q that could be used in a fixed combination with 3 doses of DM. A multiple-dose study in healthy subjects with an extensive or a poor enzyme metabolizer phenotype evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetic profile of a selected fixed-dose combination (AVP-923). Study 1 randomized 46 healthy subjects, who were extensive CYP2D6 metabolizers, to receive 0, 2.5, 10, 25, 50, or 75 mg Q twice daily in combination with 30 mg DM for 7 days. Plasma and urine samples were collected after the first and last doses for the assay of DM, dextrorphan (DX), and Q. Study 2 randomized 65 healthy extensive CYP2D6 metabolizers to 8 groups given twice-daily 45- or 60-mg DM doses combined with 0, 30, 45, or 60 mg Q for 7 days. The effects of increasing Q were not different with doses greater than 25 mg, whereas lower doses showed a dose-related increase in plasma DM concentrations. Urinary ratios of DM/DX showed a Q dose- and time-related increase in the number of subjects converted to the poor metabolizer phenotype that reached 100% on day 3 of dosing with 25 mg Q. Results from both studies indicated that 25 to 30 mg Q is adequate to maximally suppress O-demethylation of DM. Study 3 evaluated 7 extensive metabolizers and 2 poor metabolizers given an oral capsule every 12 hours containing 30 mg Q combined with 30 mg DM. DM plasma AUC values increased in both groups of subjects during the 8-day study. The mean urinary metabolic ratio (DM/DX) increased at least 27-fold in extensive metabolizers by day 8. There was no effect of Q on urinary metabolic ratios in poor metabolizers. Safety evaluations, including electrocardiograms, indicated that the combination was well tolerated, with no difference between extensive and poor metabolizer phenotypes.     

Finasteride 1 mg has no inhibitory effect on omeprazole metabolism in extensive and poor metabolizers for CYP2C19 in Japanese

Objective To examine the inhibitory effect of finasteride 1 mg on the metabolism of omeprazole in genetically determined extensive (EMs) and poor metabolizers (PMs) for CYP2C19 in young healthy Japanese male subjects.Methods Twenty-four volunteers participated in this study, among whom 12 were homozygous EMs and 12 were PMs for CYP2C19. A single center, controlled, randomized, open, crossover study with a 5 day washout between the two study periods was performed. Each of the six EMs and PMs received a single oral 20 mg dose of omeprazole on day 1 (treatment I). After a 5 day washout period, these subjects received 1 mg of finasteride once a day for three consecutive days, and a single oral 20 mg dose of omeprazole was co-administered on day 3 (treatment II). The 12 other EMs and PMs received treatments I and II in reverse. Plasma samples were collected for up to a 12 hours postdose of omeprazole, and the pharmacokinetic parameters of omeprazole were determined.Results The geometric mean ratio (GMR) for the AUC_{(0–12 hr)} of omeprazole when co-administered with finasteride/omeprazole alone is 1.13 (90%CI, 1.03, 1.25) and 0.96 (0.88, 1.05) in EMs and PMs, respectively. Finasteride did not significantly alter C_max, T_max and t_1/2 in both genotypes.Conclusion Finasteride 1 mg, widely used for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia in men, did not meaningfully increase omeprazole exposure (20 mg) in both EMs and PMs for CYP2C19. These results indicate that finasteride does not meaningfully inhibit CYP2C19 activity in vivo at the dose of 1 mg.