Improved monitoring of cytomegalovirus infection after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation by an ultrasensitive plasma DNA PCR assay

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA amplification assays in plasma have shown limited sensitivity compared to the detection of pp65 antigen in leukocytes. Our goal was to increase the sensitivity of a commercial CMV DNA PCR quantitative assay. After modification, the new assay was able to reproducibly detect 20 CMV DNA copies/ml of plasma. We compared this new ultrasensitive PCR assay with the standard PCR and the pp65 test for CMV detection and quantification in 22 consecutive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell recipients. CMV infection or reactivation was detected in 84 of 319 (26%) samples by the ultrasensitive PCR assay compared to 38 of 319 (12%) samples by the pp65 assay (P < 0.01). All samples positive by the pp65 assay were positive by the ultrasensitive PCR, and CMV episodes were detected on average 4 days earlier and 7 days later than the first and the last pp65-positive test, respectively. In addition, during CMV episodes, the ultrasensitive assay identified positive samples that were inconsistently detected by the pp65 assay. The ultrasensitive assay was also much more sensitive than the standard PCR, with 26 versus 12% of CMV DNA-positive samples (P < 0.01). This assay improved the monitoring of CMV infection or reactivation in hematopoietic allogeneic stem cell recipients.     

Whole blood real-time quantitative PCR for cytomegalovirus infection follow-up in transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a major opportunistic agent among transplant recipients. While detection of CMV pp65-lower matrix protein (pp65Ag) is still widely used for monitoring CMV infection, real-time PCR assays have been recently developed for routine quantitation of CMV DNA. However, correlations are lacking between results of pp65Ag and quantitative PCR assays and there is no consensus yet as to the more appropriate blood compartment (whole blood (WB), leukocytes, plasma) to be tested with PCR assays. OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to determine, in a population of transplant recipients: (i) the correlation between pp65Ag and CMV quantitative real-time PCR in our setting and (ii) the utility of plasma CMV DNA quantitation in comparison to WB quantitation. METHODS: In 170 blood samples (from 61 solid organ or bone marrow transplant recipients) with pp65Ag results, CMV quantitation was performed in WB and plasma using an in-house real-time quantitative PCR. RESULTS: Real-time PCR and pp65Ag results in WB were correlated: thresholds of 10 and 50(+) cells/200,000 cells were equivalent to 3.3 log(10)copies/mL (2,000 copies/mL) and 3.8 log(10)copies/mL (6,300 copies/mL), respectively. When WB viral load was >or=3.6 log(10)copies/mL, the risk to have a negative plasma CMV DNA result was 相似文献   

Relationship of cytomegalovirus load assessed by real-time PCR to pp65 antigenemia in organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in immunocompromised patients can lead to viremia associated with morbidity and mortality. Monitoring of viral loads in blood is critical for initiating and monitoring antiviral treatment. OBJECTIVES: Validate quantitative real-time PCR assay targeting the US17 and UL54 regions of the CMV genome for automated DNA and extraction and amplification. STUDY DESIGN: 3422 blood specimens from organ transplant recipients, including longitudinal specimens from 12 organ transplant recipients, were tested by CMV PCR and pp65 antigenemia. RESULTS: CMV PCR for both US17 and UL54, was more sensitive and detected CMV DNA earlier and for longer than the CMV pp65 antigenemia test. Using antigenemia results as a reference standard, an optimal cutoff of 500 normalized copies was calculated for both US17 and UL54 PCR targets based on high sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. CMV DNA levels tracked well with clinical symptoms, response to treatment, and antigenemia. CONCLUSIONS: Detection of persistent increases in CMV DNA levels above 500 normalized copies by this real-time PCR assay is indicative of symptomatic CMV disease in organ transplant recipients. Quantitative real-time PCR for CMV DNA can be used in lieu of antigenemia for monitoring CMV infection and determining when to initiate preemptive treatment.     

Quantification of cytomegalovirus DNA by a fully automated real-time PCR for early diagnosis and monitoring of active viral infection in solid organ transplant recipients

BackgroundQuantification of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA by real-time PCR is currently considered an alternative diagnostic approach for the evaluation of active infection in transplant patients. The pp65 antigenemia assay has been used as reference test for monitoring active CMV infection and guiding preemptive therapy in transplant recipients. However, this assay suffers from some limitations: need for immediate processing of the samples, labour-intensive process, lack of standardization and subjective result interpretation.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a new commercially available real-time PCR assay coupled with a fully automated DNA extraction system (COBAS Ampliprep/COBAS Taqman CMV Test, Roche Diagnostics) for the detection of CMV-DNA in plasma comparing it with pp65 antigenemia assay for monitoring active CMV infection in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs).Study designA total of 266 consecutive samples from 45 SOTRs were monitored with pp65 antigenemia and in parallel with CMV-DNA quantitation by real-time PCR assay.ResultsFifty-eight samples resulted PCR-positive, 163 negative and for 45 samples the CMV-DNA values obtained were below the lower limit of quantification (<150 copies/ml); pp65 antigen was detected in 47 samples and resulted negative in 219 specimens. Concordance between the two evaluations was 76.7%; also a good correlation was observed (r = 0.718). Considering the existing treatment criteria based on pp65 antigenemia evaluation corresponding to pp65 levels ≥ 20 positive cells/200,000, preemptive therapy was administered to four asymptomatically infected patients. The corresponding cut-off value of CMV-DNA load calculated for discrimination between self-clearing infections and those requiring therapy was 2500 copies/ml (or 2275 IU/ml).ConclusionThe fully automated real-time PCR from Roche provided specific and sensitive results and represented a rapid and simple assay for the evaluation and monitoring of CMV infection in SOTRs. Further studies are required to validate the threshold level for the initiation of preemptive therapy.     

Monitoring of viral load by quantitative plasma PCR during active cytomegalovirus infection of individual liver transplant patients

A quantitative PCR test, the Cobas Amplicor CMV Monitor, was used for the monitoring of viral load in the peripheral blood of 27 individual liver transplant patients and correlated with cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65 antigenemia. Altogether, 243 specimens were analyzed. During the first 3 months, 20 patients showed PCR positivity which correlated with pp65 antigenemia. Of those, 13 patients developed symptomatic CMV infection 27 to 52 days after transplantation, with a significantly higher peak viral load in PCR and in pp65 assay compared with the seven asymptomatic infections (median 10,200 versus 2,240 copies/ml, P < 0.05, and median 100 versus 30 pp65-positive cells/50,000 leukocytes, P < 0.01). Five were primary infections of D+/R- cases (donor CMV seropositive and recipient seronegative) and demonstrated, except in one case, a high peak viral load (>10,000 copies/ml; range, 10,200 to 21,600 copies, and > or =50 positive cells, range, 50 to 800 cells). The peak viral loads of the six D+/R+ patients with symptomatic infection varied widely (range, 2,290 to 126,000 copies and 50 to 300 positive cells). Two D-/R+ patients developed symptomatic infection with a lower viral load (range, 1,120 to 6,510 copies and 25 to 100 positive cells). All symptomatic infections were successfully treated with ganciclovir. The asymptomatic infections all in D+/R+ patients with low copy numbers (<5,500 copies) were monitored until CMV disappeared. One of the seven PCR-negative patients had one sample with low antigenemia, but the subsequent specimens were all negative. The time-related correlation of the two methods was also good. In summary, quantitative PCR could equally well be used as the CMV pp65 assay for the monitoring of viral load in individual transplant patients.     

Validation of clinical application of cytomegalovirus plasma DNA load measurement and definition of treatment criteria by analysis of correlation to antigen detection

Successful preemptive cytomegalovirus (CMV) therapy in transplant patients depends on the availability of sensitive, specific, and timely diagnostic tests for CMV infections. The pp65 antigenemia assay has been used for this purpose with considerable success. Quantification of CMV DNA is currently regarded to be an alternative diagnostic approach. The precise relationship between these two methods has still to be defined, but is essential to compare diagnostic results. This study compared the results of both assays with a large series of transplant recipients in different categories. An internally controlled quantitative real-time CMV DNA PCR was used to test 409 plasma samples from solid organ transplant (SOT) and stem cell transplant (SCT) patients. Levels of CMV DNA in plasma correlated well with classified outcomes of the pp65 antigenemia test. Despite this correlation, the quantitative CMV PCR values in a class of antigen test results were within a wide range, and the definition of an optimal cutoff value for initiating treatment required further analysis by a receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. This is essential for reactivating infections in particular. For the SCT patients the optimal cutoff value of CMV DNA load defining relevant viral reactivation (in this assay, 10,000 copies/ml) was slightly higher than that for the SOT patients (6,300 copies/ml). Based on a comparison with the established pp65 antigenemia assay, quantification of CMV DNA in plasma appeared to be capable of guiding the clinical management of transplant recipients. This approach may have important advantages, which include a superior reproducibility and sensitivity, allowing the inclusion of kinetic criteria in clinical guidelines.     

Quantification of DNA in plasma by an automated real-time PCR assay (cytomegalovirus PCR kit) for surveillance of active cytomegalovirus infection and guidance of preemptive therapy for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

The performance of a plasma real-time PCR (cytomegalovirus [CMV] PCR kit; Abbott Diagnostics) was compared with that of the antigenemia assay for the surveillance of active CMV infection in 42 allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) recipients. A total of 1,156 samples were analyzed by the two assays. Concordance between the two assays was 82.2%. Plasma DNA levels correlated with the number of pp65-positive cells, particularly prior to the initiation of preemptive therapy. Fifty-seven episodes of active CMV infection were detected in 37 patients: 18 were defined solely by the PCR assay and four were defined on the basis of the antigenemia assay. Either a cutoff of 288 CMV DNA copies/ml or a 2.42-log₁₀ increase of DNAemia levels between two consecutive PCR positive samples was an optimal value to discriminate between patients requiring preemptive therapy and those not requiring therapy on the basis of the antigenemia results. The real-time PCR assay allowed an earlier diagnosis of active CMV infection and was a more reliable marker of successful clearance of CMV from the blood. Analysis of the kinetics of DNAemia levels at a median of 7 days posttreatment allowed the prediction of the response to CMV therapy. Two patients developed CMV colitis. The PCR assay tested positive both before the onset of symptoms and during the disease period. The plasma real-time PCR from Abbott is more suitable than the antigenemia assay for monitoring active CMV infection in Allo-SCT recipients and may be used for guiding preemptive therapy in this clinical setting.     

Analysis of a quantitative PCR assay for CMV infection in liver transplant recipients: an intent to find the optimal cut-off value.

BACKGROUND: Preemptive therapy required highly predictive tests for CMV disease. CMV antigenemia assay (pp65 Ag) has been commonly used for rapid diagnosis of CMV infection. Amplification methods for early detection of CMV DNA are under analysis. OBJECTIVES: To compare two diagnostic methods for CMV infection and disease in this population: quantitative PCR (qPCR) performed in two different samples, plasma and leukocytes (PMNs) and using a commercial diagnostic test (COBAS Amplicor Monitor Test) versus pp65 Ag. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study conducted in liver transplant recipients from February 2000 to February 2001. RESULTS: Analyses were performed on 164 samples collected weekly during early post-transplant period from 33 patients. Agreements higher than 78% were observed between the three assays. Optimal qPCR cut-off values were calculated using ROC curves for two specific antigenemia values. For antigenemia >or=10 positive cells, the optimal cut-off value for qPCR in plasma was 1330 copies/ml, with a sensitivity (S) of 58% and a specificity (E) of 98% and the optimal cut-off value for qPCR-cells was 713 copies/5x10(6) cells (S:91.7% and E:86%). Using a threshold of antigenemia >or=20 positive cells, the optimal cut-off values were 1330 copies/ml for qPCR-plasma (S 87%; E 98%) and 4755 copies/5x10(6) cells for qPCR-cells (S 87.5%; E 98%). Prediction values for the three assays were calculated in patients with CMV disease (9 pts; 27%). Considering the assays in a qualitative way, the most sensitive was CMV PCR in cells (S: 100%, E: 54%, PPV: 40%; NPV: 100%). Using specific cut-off values for disease detection the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for antigenemia >or=10 positive cells were: 89%; 83%; 67%; 95%, respectively. For qPCR-cells >or=713 copies/5x10(6) cells: 100%; 54%; 33% and 100% and for plasma-qPCR>or=1330 copies/ml: 78%, 77%, 47%, 89% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal cut-off for viral load performed in plasma and cells can be obtained for the breakpoint antigenemia value recommended for initiating preemptive therapy with high specificities and sensitivities. Diagnostic assays like CMV pp65 Ag and quantitative PCR for CMV have similar efficiency and could be recommended as methods of choice for diagnosis and monitoring of active CMV infection after transplantation.     

Comparison of a UL111a real-time PCR and pp65 antigenemia for the detection of cytomegalovirus

Surveillance of cytomegalovirus (CMV) replication in transplant patients is crucial for the success of transplantation. To compare a CMV pp65 antigenemia (pp65Ag) and a quantitative real‐time PCR targeting the CMV‐UL111a (UL111aPCR), all whole blood samples taken between July 2008 and October 2009 were identified which had been analyzed prospectively by both assays in parallel. Discordant results were re‐analyzed using a published CMV duplex PCR targeting regions UL55 and UL123exon4. Of 720 samples from 81 transplant patients, CMV replication was detected in 244 specimens (34%) by the UL111aPCR (median, 1,019 geq/ml), compared to 113 (16%) detected by the pp65Ag (median, 2/250,000 leukocytes). Concordant UL111aPCR/pp65Ag results were obtained in 561 (78%) samples, being positive in 99 (14%), and negative in 462 (64%). As a rule of thumb, 1 pp65Ag‐positive cell per 250,000 leukocytes corresponded to 1,000 geq/ml CMV DNA of whole blood. Discordant results were found in 159 samples (22%), being UL111aPCR‐positive/pp65Ag‐negative in 145 (91%; median, 650 geq/ml), or UL111aPCR‐negative/pp65Ag‐positive in 14 (9%; median, 1/250,000 cells). Using the duplex PCR targeting the CMV UL55 and the UL123‐exon4 genes, 131 of 139 (94%) discordant UL111aPCR‐positives (median UL111aPCR, 639 geq/ml; median UL55PCR, 715 geq/ml; median UL123PCR, 1,103 geq/ml) were confirmed. Of 14 discordant pp65Ag‐positives, duplex PCR was also negative in 8, and of low copy number in 6. Thus, CMV UL111aPCR provides more sensitive quantitation of CMV replication than pp65Ag, however, discordant results can occur at very low viral loads. J. Med. Virol. 83:2143–2150, 2011. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Quantitative PCR in the diagnosis of CMV infection and in the monitoring of viral load during the antiviral treatment in renal transplant patients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a significant problem in transplantation. In this study, a quantitative PCR test was compared with the CMVpp65 antigenemia assay not only in the diagnosis CMV infections but especially in the monitoring of viral loads during ganciclovir treatment of CMV disease in individual renal transplant patients. Altogether 342 blood specimens were obtained from 116 patients. Blood specimens were used for Cobas Amplicor Monitor plasma PCR and for the pp65 assay. Also shell vial culture was performed. The patients with a positive pp65 finding were monitored for CMV weekly during ganciclovir treatment and/or until the antigenemia subsided. CMV was detected in 31/116 (27%) patients, of whom 14 (12%) developed CMV disease and were treated with ganciclovir. CMV was found by shell vial culture in 13/14 cases, but by PCR and pp65 test in all 14 patients. CMV was detected in 156 (45%) samples; by PCR in 121/156 (range 344-103,000 copies/ml) and by pp65 test in 138/156 (range 1-1,000 positive cells/50,000 leukocytes) and by culture in 59/156 (38%) only. The peak viral loads were significantly (P<0.0001) higher in CMV disease than in untreated infections (19,650 vs. 379 copies/ml, and 100 vs. 5pp65 positive cells). In the monitoring of individual patients, the time-related CMV-DNAemia and pp65 antigenemia correlated well during the treatment of CMV disease. In conclusion, Cobas Amplicor Monitor plasma PCR and CMVpp65 antigen assays can be equally used in the diagnosis CMV infection and in the monitoring of viral load during antiviral treatment.     

Cytomegalovirus quantification in plasma by an automated real-time PCR assay.

BACKGROUND: Sensitive quantitation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA in blood is helpful for the diagnosis of CMV infection or reactivation and the monitoring of transplanted patients. OBJECTIVES: We compared a new PCR assay coupled with an automated extraction system (CMV real-time PCR, Abbott Molecular, Des Plaines, IL, USA) to a previously validated method (ultrasensitive Cobas Amplicor CMV DNA Monitor, Roche Molecular, Indianapolis, IN, USA). RESULTS: Using limiting dilutions of CMV DNA positive plasma, the two assays had a similar detection threshold ranging between 20 and 45 copies/ml. Coefficients of variation of CMV real-time PCR assay varied from 1 to 12% for CMV DNA levels between 10,000 and 20 copies/ml. Viral loads assessed by the two methods on 179 clinical samples showed an overall concordance of 89% and an excellent correlation (R=0.94). Discrepancies were only observed for samples with low CMV DNA levels (<300 copies/ml); 18 samples were positive by CMV real-time PCR only, and 2 samples by ultrasensitive Cobas CMV only. Values obtained by CMV real-time PCR were on average 0.4 log higher than those of ultrasensitive Cobas CMV. Successive samples of transplanted patients with evidence of CMV infection/reactivation revealed that CMV real-time PCR assay was positive earlier and for a longer period of time after treatment initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Although both assays had similar analytical performances, the CMV real-time PCR assay has the advantages of automated extraction and higher dynamic range, and shows a trend for an improved sensitivity that might impact on clinical decisions.     

Monitoring low cytomegalovirus viremia in transplanted patients by a real-time PCR on plasma

Until recently, human cytomegalovirus (hCMV) infection and anti-CMV treatment in transplanted patients have been monitored essentially by pp65 antigenemia, which is time-consuming and requires experienced operators. For the last two years, pp65 antigenemia levels have tended to be lower than previously in our laboratory, which could be due to better monitoring of CMV-related risk. Results obtained by real-time PCR with a LightCycler instrument or by pp65 antigen assay were compared on 145 serial samples from bone marrow or kidney transplant recipients under the usual conditions of our laboratory. CMV DNA was extracted from plasma and quantified by using primers and probes directed to HXFL4 gene. The plasma CMV DNA load was measured by using a standard curve constructed with a commercially available quantified CMV DNA suspension. Among the 145 samples, 139 showed a pp65 antigen which was negative or lower than 20 positively stained cells per 200,000 leukocytes. In the patients with positive pp65 antigenemia, the corresponding values of CMV DNA copy number/ml were significantly higher than those observed in patients without antigenemia (P < 0.001). CMV DNA was detected from 4 up to 52 days before pp65 antigen. Elsewhere, between two dates at which pp65 antigen was positive, intermediate PCR results could be positive while the pp65 antigen was negative. This real-time quantitative PCR assay is a rapid technique adapted to monitor plasma CMV DNA in transplant setting, even for low viremia.     

Assessment of CMV load in solid organ transplant recipients by pp65 antigenemia and real-time quantitative DNA PCR assay: correlation with pp67 RNA detection

After bone marrow (BM) or solid-organ (SO) transplantation viremic Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is observed frequently. Quantitative assay of CMV in blood helps the management of this clinical condition. In the present report, 83 samples from 39 solid organ recipients, three CMV assays were compared simultaneously for the first time: the Nuclisens CMV pp67 assay (nucleic acid sequence-based amplification, NASBA), an "in-house" quantitative real-time PCR assay (TaqMan) for CMV DNA, and pp65 antigenemia. The relation between CMV DNA and pp65 antigenemia, the quantitative assays, was evaluated on a larger group including 251 blood samples from 118 solid organ recipients. Real-time PCR provided the best results; > or =130 CMV DNA copies/2 x 10(5) peripheral blood leukocytes (PBLs) predicted > or =1 pp65 antigen positive (Ag+) cell/2 x 10(5) PBLs. By taking pp65 antigenemia as the "gold standard," the sensitivity of CMV DNA quantitation and of the pp67 RNA assay were 0.95 and 0.20, respectively, while the corresponding specificity values were 0.50 and 0.93. When real-time PCR was considered as the "gold standard," the sensitivity and specificity of the pp65 antigenemia were 0.65 and 0.91, respectively. Among the three tests examined, the sensitivity of the pp67 RNA assay was the lowest. On the other hand, the pp67 RNA assay was highly specific and effective in pinpointing high viremia patients. The present report, by providing predictive values for all three diagnostic profiles, DNA load, antigenemia, and pp67RNA, is a contribution for validation of real-time PCR as a new standard for quantitative assessment of CMV viremia in clinical settings.     

Optimization of quantitative detection of cytomegalovirus DNA in plasma by real-time PCR

Previous studies have shown that detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA in plasma is less sensitive than the antigenemia assay for CMV surveillance in blood. In 1,983 blood samples, plasma PCR assays with three different primer sets (UL125 alone, UL126 alone, and UL55/UL123-exon 4) were compared to the pp65 antigenemia assay and blood cultures. Plasma PCR detected CMV more frequently in blood specimens than either the antigenemia assay or cultures, but of the three PCR assays, the double-primer assay (UL55/UL123-exon 4) performed best with regard to sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values compared to antigenemia: 122 of 151 antigenemia-positive samples were detected (sensitivity, 80.1%), and there were 122 samples that were PCR positive-antigenemia negative (specificity, 93%). Samples with discrepant results had a low viral load (median, 0.5 cells per slide; 1,150 copies per ml) and were often obtained from patients receiving antiviral therapy. CMV could be detected by other methods in 15 of 29 antigenemia positive-PCR negative samples compared to 121 of 122 PCR positive-antigenemia negative samples (P < 0.001). On a per-subject basis, 21 of 25 patients (antigenemia positive-PCR negative) and all 57 (PCR positive-antigenemia negative) could be confirmed at different time points during follow-up. The higher sensitivity of the double-primer assay resulted in earlier detection compared to antigenemia in a time-to-event analysis of 42 CMV-seropositive stem cell transplant recipients, and two of three patients with CMV disease who were antigenemia negative were detected by plasma PCR prior to the onset of disease. Interassay variability was low, and the dynamic range was >5 log(10). Automated DNA extraction resulted in high reproducibility, accurate CMV quantitation (R = 0.87, P < 0.001), improved sensitivity, and increased speed of sample processing. Thus, primer optimization and improved DNA extraction techniques resulted in a plasma-based PCR assay that is significantly more sensitive than pp65 antigenemia and blood cultures for detection of CMV in blood specimens.     

Evaluation of the AmpliSensor PCR and the SHARP signal detection system for the early prediction of symptomatic CMV infection in solid transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is associated with high morbidity and mortality in transplant patients. Specific antiviral treatment at an early stage of CMV infection may effectively ameliorate, but not eliminate CMV disease in these patients. Presently, the pp65 antigenemia test on peripheral leukocytes is the method most widely used for predicting and monitoring transplant patients for active CMV infection. Nucleic acid amplification methods are less well defined since they lack standardisation. OBJECTIVE: A seminested fluorometric PCR assay (AmpliSensor-CMV, BAG, Germany) and a one-step PCR with a signal-amplification step (SHARP, Abbott, Germany) specific for the fragments of the CMV UL 122 and UL 123 genes, respectively, were evaluated for the early diagnosis of CMV infection. DESIGN: A total of 26 recipients of heterogeneous solid organs were monitored prospectively for a median of 99 days after transplantation. By testing 371 clinical samples parallel with the pp65-antigen assay and IgM and IgG EIA assays the sensitivity, specificity, correlation and quantitation potential of both PCRs was evaluated. RESULTS: Eight out of 26 patients developed active CMV infection. A total of 48 samples of these patients exceeded a CMV-DNA load threshold of 15 genome equivalents/10(5) leukocytes (AmpliSensor-CMV) and 41 samples exceeded the critical cut-off for the SHARP system. The AmpliSensor PCR exceeded its threshold consistently before the clinical onset of CMV disease (median 8 days). There was very good agreement between symptomatic CMV infection in patients and AmpliSensor-PCR, SHARP PCR, and pp65-antigen results (kappa-coefficient > 0.900). IgM and IgG EIA showed moderate agreement (kappa-coefficient = 0.591 and 0.552, respectively). CONCLUSION: Both PCRs and pp65 antigen assay correlated significantly better with CMV disease than serodiagnosis. The AmpliSensor PCR allowed more precisely than the SHARP system a quantitative determination of viral load and an early and reliable prediction of active CMV infection. The use of AmpliSensor PCR may improve the diagnosis and management of active CMV infection in organ transplant recipients.     

Comparison of two quantitative CMV PCR tests, Cobas Amplicor CMV Monitor and TaqMan assay, and pp65-antigenemia assay in the determination of viral loads from peripheral blood of organ transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Quantitative PCR assays have become the most common methods in the determination of viral load during cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection of transplant patients. However, usually these tests are still quite time-consuming and labor-intensive which diminishes their utility of these tests in routine diagnostic laboratories. Objectives: The objective of this study was to develop a quantitative CMV PCR test which is time-saving and easy to perform for the detection and monitoring of CMV infection of transplant patients. STUDY DESIGN: The quantitative real time CMV PCR assay using TaqMan chemistry and an automated sample preparation system, MagNA Pure LC, was developed. The designed quantitative CMV test was compared to commercial quantitative PCR test, Cobas Amplicor Monitor, in the determination of CMV DNA loads in plasma samples of liver and kidney transplant patients. The results were also correlated with the CMV pp65-antigenemia test. The clinical material of 270 blood specimens of transplant patients were tested using these two PCR methods and pp65-antigenemia test in parallel. Plasma samples were used for PCR assays and leucocytes for the antigenemia test. RESULTS: The TaqMan assay described was easy to perform, it was rapid (3-4 h) and hands-on time needed for performing the test was short. The detection limit of the assay was 250 copies/ml (cps/ml) plasma and the linear range up to 25,000,000 cps/ml. TaqMan assay was the most sensitive test detecting 92% of the CMV positive findings. Cobas Monitor detected 80% and pp65 test 88% of the positive findings. The correlations between TaqMan and antigenemia assays, and between Cobas Amplicor and antigenemia were statistically significant and high, R = 0.84 (P < 0.0001) and R = 0.80 (P < 0.0001), respectively. Also correlation between two PCR tests was statistically significant (R = 0.64, P < 0.0001). Of the 27 patient studied, 19 demonstrated CMV antigenemia and DNAemia in their blood during the post transplant monitoring. Thirteen of these patients developed a symptomatic CMV infection and were treated with ganciclovir. The peak viral loads of symptomatic patients were statistically higher by all three methods than those of asymptomatic patients. CONCLUSIONS: The developed real time TaqMan assay was rapid and easily performed and could be the best alternative for the diagnosis of CMV infection and monitoring of liver and kidney transplant patients.     

Quantification of Human Cytomegalovirus DNA in Bone Marrow Transplant Recipients by Real-Time PCR

A real-time PCR assay was developed to quantify human cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA in peripheral blood leukocytes (PBLs) of bone marrow transplantation patients. Unlike other teams, we quantified CMV and the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) gene using a plasmid containing both sequences as an external standard. Tenfold serial dilutions of this plasmid yielded overlapping standard curves that allowed the quantification of CMV and GAPDH gene copies in an efficient and accurate manner. Sequential blood samples (164 specimens) were collected from 16 patients. PBLs were tested by the pp65 antigenemia assay and quantitative CMV and GAPDH gene PCRs. CMV DNA was detected by PCR in 13 patients a mean of 15 days prior to the appearance of antigenemia. The administration of anti-CMV drugs led to a rapid decrease in the numbers of viral copies and positive nuclei. Real-time PCR assay results correlated with those of the CMV pp65 antigenemia assay (P < 0.00001). The TaqMan assay may be a useful tool for rapid quantification of CMV infection and for monitoring of CMV reactivation in bone marrow transplantation recipients.     

Quantitation of cytomegalovirus DNA by real-time polymerase chain reaction in peripheral blood specimens of patients with solid organ transplants: comparison with end-point PCR and pp65 antigen test

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA quantitation provides sensitive and specific data for detecting CMV as well as monitoring the infection and determining the appropriate antiviral strategy. A recently introduced real-time PCR assay for CMV DNA quantitation was applied on 158 peripheral blood leukocytes (PBLs) from 32 liver-transplanted patients with CMV asymptomatic infection and correlated with a commercial quantitative end-point PCR (COBAS AMPLICOR CMV Monitor) and CMV pp65 antigenemia. A good correlation was found between real-time PCR and pp65 antigen test (r2 = 0.691) and the two PCR assays (r2 = 0.761). Real-time PCR data were higher in pre-emptive treated patients (>20 pp65 + positive cells, median CMV DNA value: 3.8 log(10) copies/500,000 PBLs) than in not-treated ones (2.9 logs). According to pp65 levels of 0, 1-10, 11-20, 21-50, 51-100, and >100 positive cells/200,000 PBLs, median CMV DNA by real-time PCR was 2.6, 3.0, 3.6, 4.0, 4.2, and 4.8 logs, respectively, (CMV DNA levels by COBAS AMPLICOR: 2.8, 2.9, 3.8, 3.7, 3.9, and 4.0 logs). For samples with >20 pp65 + cells, real-time PCR gave significantly higher values than in groups with <20 pp65 + cells, whereas the COBAS AMPLICOR results showed a slower progression rate. Dilutions of CMV AD169 strain were used to probe real-time PCR reproducibility (between and intra-assay variability <2%) and sensitivity (100% detection rate at 10 copies/reaction, 28.5% with end-point PCR). In conclusion, real-time PCR significantly improves the study of CMV DNA dynamics due to a more reliable quantitation of CMV DNA for moderate and high DNA level compared to end-point PCR with better sensitivity and specificity. Real-time PCR provides more precise information for evaluating infection progress and assessing antiviral response, simplifying and accelerating the process of producing a reliable quantitation of CMV DNA for clinical purposes.     

Evaluation of a novel real-time PCR system for cytomegalovirus DNA quantitation on whole blood and correlation with pp65-antigen test in guiding pre-emptive antiviral treatment

Successful pre-emptive anti-cytomegalovirus (CMV) therapy relies on sensitive, specific and reproducible tests for CMV detection. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for CMV-DNA provides a superior reproducibility and sensitivity than pp65-antigenemia. Evaluation of a novel commercial real-time PCR for CMV-DNA associated with a fully automated DNA extraction from whole blood (WB) was performed, studying the correlation with pp65-antigenemia in guiding pre-emptive therapy. Analytical evaluation showed that PCR correctly quantitated CMV from 500 to 500,000copies/ml with a close correlation with expected values (r=0.999). Clinical evaluation on 375 consecutive WB samples from 48 infected patients (18 pre-emptively treated for pp65 values >/=50 positive cells) showed that according to pp65-antigenemia of 0, 1-10, 11-49 and >/=50 positive cells, median DNA levels were 3.7, 3.9, 4.6 and 5.6 log(10)copies/ml, respectively. According to existing pre-emptive treatment criteria based on pp65-antigenemia, receiver-operating curve analysis indicated 5.3log/ml (200,000genomes/ml) as the best CMV-DNA level to discriminate between patients requiring pre-emptive therapy and those who did not (positive predictive value: 91%; negative predictive value: 74%; sensitivity and specificity: 68 and 93%). In conclusion, real-time PCR provides reliable results for monitoring the developing of CMV infection, allowing for the definition of CMV-DNA thresholds associated with infection progress.     

Multicentric evaluation of a new commercial cytomegalovirus real-time PCR quantitation assay

Automated real-time PCR systems have become the most common method in the quantitation of viral load during cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in immuno-compromised patients. In order to evaluate a new commercially available CMV real-time PCR assay (CMV R-gene, Argene, France), a pp65 antigenemia assay and four different "in-house" real-time PCR assays were compared to the CMV R-gene for the detection and the quantitation of CMV load in 506 specimens of whole blood from transplant patients in four French hospital laboratories. The CMV R-gene was more sensitive than the pp65 antigenemia: there were 18% antigenemia-negative versus CMV R-gene-positive samples. A significant correlation was found between DNA quantitation by CMV R-gene and the number of positive cells detected by the pp65 antigenemia test (Spearman's rank test, r=0.63, p<0.0001). A CMV DNA load equivalent to 50 pp65-positive cells/200000 polymorphonuclear leukocytes was 5.26log(10)copies/mL of whole blood. When the CMV R-gene kit was compared to the four other "in-house" real-time PCR assays, there were few discordant results (6.7% total for the four laboratories), all detected with a weak positive CMV DNA viral load. Spearman's coefficients showed a good (r=0.82 for laboratory 1, r=0.66 for laboratory 3) to excellent (r=0.99 for laboratory 2, r=0.94 for laboratory 4) correlation between CMV R-gene and the four real-time "in-house" PCR assays. However, the results of CMV DNA viral load generated by CMV R-gene test were constantly higher than those generated by three out of four "in-house" PCR assays. This mean variation in CMV DNA viral load measured by CMV R-gene and "in-house" PCRs was of 0.77log(10), 0.04log(10), 0.77log(10) and 0.97log(10), for laboratories 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. We concluded that there was variability between results of different real-time PCR assays for CMV DNA quantitation. This observation emphasized the need of a standardised commercial assay to allow an "inter-laboratory" comparison of results. Our study showed that CMV R-gene is an accurate, efficient, reliable and versatile tool for rapid diagnosis and monitoring of CMV disease in transplantation recipients.