Acoustic startle at baseline and during acute alcohol withdrawal in replicate mouse lines selectively bred for high or low alcohol preference

BACKGROUND: Previous data in both rat and mouse genetic models suggest that there is a genetic relationship between acute alcohol withdrawal responses and innate alcohol drinking behavior. The purpose of the present study was to examine whether acute alcohol withdrawal responses, as measured by acoustic startle and prepulse inhibition (PPI) of acoustic startle, may be genetically related to innate differences in alcohol preference in 2 mouse lines selectively bred for high (HAP1 and HAP2) or low (LAP1 and LAP2) alcohol preference. Line differences in startle responses at baseline, prior to alcohol or saline treatment, were also measured. METHODS: Alcohol-naive, male and female HAP1 (n = 35) and LAP1 (n = 32) and HAP2 (n = 43) and LAP2 (n = 40) mice were tested under baseline conditions and during withdrawal from a single injection of 4.0 g/kg alcohol or equal volume of saline at 4, 8, and 12 hours post-injection. RESULTS: On most trial types, baseline startle responses and PPI were greater in both HAP lines than in both LAP lines, and startle responses were greater in males than in females. During acute alcohol withdrawal, both male LAP lines, and LAP1 females, showed reduced startle responses at the 4-hour time point during acute alcohol withdrawal. In contrast, both HAP1 males and females showed a trend toward enhanced startle at 4 hours in withdrawal. No clear differences in PPI during withdrawal were evident. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate good evidence for a genetic relationship between greater baseline acoustic startle responses and PPI and high alcohol preference. Modest support for a genetic correlation between low alcohol preference and reduced startle responses at 4 hours in withdrawal was found in male mice. The suppression in acoustic startle during acute alcohol withdrawal in male LAP lines but not in male HAP lines suggests that a genetic propensity toward low alcohol preference may be related to greater sensitivity to alcohol as measured by acoustic startle responses during acute alcohol withdrawal.     

Ethanol Reward and Aversion in Mice Bred for Sensitivity to Ethanol Withdrawal

The present study examined mice selectively bred for sensitivity to ethanol withdrawal for differences in the conditioned place preference (CPP) and conditioned taste aversion (CTA) paradigms. Withdrawal Seizure-Prone (WSP) and Withdrawal Seizure-Resistant (WSR) mice and High Alcohol Withdrawal (HAW) and Low Alcohol Withdrawal (LAW) mice were selectively bred for differences in chronic and acute ethanol withdrawal, respectively. For the CPP experiment, male HAW and LAW (generation 5) mice received four pairings of ethanol (2g/kg), with a distinctive floor stimulus. On intervening days, mice received saline paired with an alternate floor type. During the preference test, all mice received an injection of saline before 60-min access to both floor types. HAW mice showed conditioned preference for the ethanol-paired floor, whereas LAW mice did not. For the CTA experiments, male HAW, LAW, WSP, and WSR mice were adapted to a 2-hr/day water restriction regimen and subsequently received ethanol injections (0, 2, 2.5, or 4 g/kg, ip) immediately after 1-hr access to a NaCl-flavored solution. Dose-dependent reductions in NaCl intake reflected the development of CTA in both HAW/LAW and WSP/WSR lines. However, a smaller magnitude of CTA was observed in WSP mice relative to WSR mice after the first ethanol-NaCl pairing. WSP/WSR mice showed similar reductions of NaCl intake on subsequent conditioning trials. Overall, these data suggest that HAW mice selectively bred for high sensitivity to acute ethanol withdrawal are more sensitive to the rewarding effects of ethanol in the CPP paradigm. This outcome is consistent with a previous study showing greater CPP in WSP mice relative to WSR mice. In the CTA paradigm, sensitivity to ethanol withdrawal in the HAW/ LAW selected lines does not appear to be genetically correlated with sensitivity to the aversive properties of ethanol. However, the difference in acquisition of CTA in WSP/WSR lines suggest that some genes determining ethanol withdrawal severity may also influence initial sensitivity to ethanol's aversive effects.     

Limited Access Alcohol Drinking in High- and Low-Alcohol Preferring Selected Lines of Mice

BACKGROUND: Selection studies and genetic analyses of drinking behavior in rodents often involved unlimited access to alcohol over a period of weeks, with water and food freely available. Most studies investigating the pharmacology of alcohol drinking, on the other hand, use procedures in which access to alcohol is limited to a particular time each day. Reconciliation of findings between these two conditions likely depends on their sharing common genetic mechanisms as indicated, for example, by covariation in response to selection. To this end, high- and low-alcohol preferring (HAP and LAP, respectively) mice, selected for differences in 24-hr access alcohol drinking over a 4-week period, were subjected to a limited access alcohol drinking protocol. METHODS: During 2-hr sessions, mice had access to various concentrations of alcohol (7-15%, v/v) in the home cage for 2 hr a day, with ad libitum access to food and water. Additional sessions were conducted with no food present. RESULTS: Although both strains consumed alcohol and water during these sessions, HAP mice drank far more alcohol than did LAP mice. HAP but not LAP mice drank alcohol at a high rate early in the session compared with later in the session. Additionally, HAP mice responded to changes in alcohol concentration, whereas LAP mice did not. Removal of food did not influence alcohol drinking, although water drinking decreased following food removal. HAP mice reached appreciable blood alcohol concentrations after limited access. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that in these selectively bred mice, alcohol drinking during limited and unlimited access may be genetically related, and that drinking during limited access sessions in HAP mice is likely for the pharmacological properties of alcohol.     

Development of ethanol withdrawal-related sensitization and relapse drinking in mice selected for high- or low-ethanol preference

Background: Previous studies have shown that high alcohol consumption is associated with low withdrawal susceptibility, while at the same time, other studies have shown that exposure to ethanol vapor increases alcohol drinking in rats and mice. In the present studies, we sought to shed light on this seeming contradiction using mice selectively bred for High‐ (HAP) and Low‐ (LAP) Alcohol Preference, first, assessing these lines for differences in signs of ethanol withdrawal and second, for differences in the efficacy of intermittent alcohol vapor exposure on elevating subsequent ethanol intake. Methods: Experiment 1 examined whether these lines of mice differed in ethanol withdrawal‐induced CNS hyperexcitability and the development of sensitization to this effect following intermittent ethanol vapor exposure. Adult HAP and LAP lines (replicates 1 and 2), and the C3H/HeNcr inbred strain (included as a control genotype for comparison purposes) received intermittent exposure to ethanol vapor and were evaluated for ethanol withdrawal‐induced seizures assessed by scoring handling‐induced convulsions (HIC). Experiment 2 examined the influence of chronic intermittent ethanol exposure on voluntary ethanol drinking. Adult male and female HAP‐2 and LAP‐2 mice, along with male C57BL/6J (included as comparative controls) were trained to drink 10% ethanol using a limited access (2 h/d) 2‐bottle choice paradigm. After stable baseline daily intake was established, mice received chronic intermittent ethanol vapor exposure in inhalation chambers. Ethanol intake sessions resumed 72 hours after final ethanol (or air) exposure for 5 consecutive days. Results: Following chronic ethanol treatment, LAP mice exhibited overall greater withdrawal seizure activity compared with HAP mice. In Experiment 2, chronic ethanol exposure/withdrawal resulted in a significant increase in ethanol intake in male C57BL/6J, and modestly elevated intake in HAP‐2 male mice. Ethanol intake for male control mice did not change from baseline levels of intake. In contrast, HAP‐2 female and LAP‐2 mice of both sexes did not show changes in ethanol intake as a consequence of intermittent ethanol exposure. Conclusions: Overall, these results indicate that the magnitude of ethanol withdrawal‐related seizures is inversely related to inherited ethanol intake preference. Additionally, intermittent ethanol vapor exposure appears more likely to affect high‐drinking mice (C57BL/6J and HAP‐2) than low drinkers, although these animals are less affected by ethanol withdrawal.     

Genetic correlation between innate alcohol preference and fear-potentiated startle in selected mouse lines

Background: There is a high rate of co‐occurrence between anxiety and alcohol‐use disorders in humans that may arise from the inheritance of common genes that increase the risk for both psychiatric disorders. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a genetic relationship exists between innate alcohol preference and propensity to develop learned fear, using the fear‐potentiated startle (FPS) paradigm, in 2 mouse lines selectively bred for high or low alcohol preference. Methods: Alcohol‐naïve, male, and female mice from replicate pairs of lines selectively bred for high alcohol preference and low alcohol preference were randomly assigned to a fear‐conditioned or control group. Mice in the fear‐conditioned group received 20 pairings of a light stimulus and footshock; the control group received the same number of exposures to light and footshock, except that these stimuli were explicitly unpaired. During testing for FPS, acoustic stimuli were presented both in the presence and in the absence of the light stimulus. Results: In both replicate pairs of lines, mice selectively bred for high alcohol preference showed greater FPS than mice selectively bred for low alcohol preference. No sex differences in FPS were found in any line. Control groups did not show FPS. Conclusion: These findings suggest that common genes mediate both innate alcohol preference and propensity to develop learned fear in these selected mouse lines.     

Genomewide SNP Screen to Detect Quantitative Trait Loci for Alcohol Preference in the High Alcohol Preferring and Low Alcohol Preferring Mice

Background:  The high and low alcohol preferring (HAP1 and LAP1) mouse lines were selectively bred for differences in alcohol intake. The HAP1 and LAP1 mice are essentially noninbred lines that originated from the outbred colony of HS/Ibg mice, a heterogeneous stock developed from intercrossing 8 inbred strains of mice.
Methods:  A total of 867 informative SNPs were genotyped in 989 HAP1 × LAP1 F2, 68 F1s, 14 parents (6 LAP1, 8 HAP1), as well as the 8 inbred strains of mice crossed to generate the HS/Ibg colony. Multipoint genome wide analyses were performed to simultaneously detect linked QTLs and also fine map these regions using the ancestral haplotypes.
Results:  QTL analysis detected significant evidence of association on 4 chromosomes: 1, 3, 5, and 9. The region on chromosome 9 was previously found linked in a subset of these F2 animals using a whole genome microsatellite screen.
Conclusions:  We have detected strong evidence of association to multiple chromosomal regions in the mouse. Several of these regions include candidate genes previously associated with alcohol dependence in humans or other animal models.     

Age- and sex-dependent effects of footshock stress on subsequent alcohol drinking and acoustic startle behavior in mice selectively bred for high-alcohol preference

Background: Exposure to stress during adolescence is known to be a risk factor for alcohol‐use and anxiety disorders. This study examined the effects of footshock stress during adolescence on subsequent alcohol drinking in male and female mice selectively bred for high‐alcohol preference (HAP1 lines). Acoustic startle responses and prepulse inhibition (PPI) were also assessed in the absence of, and immediately following, subsequent footshock stress exposures to determine whether a prior history of footshock stress during adolescence would produce enduring effects on anxiety‐related behavior and sensorimotor gating. Methods: Alcohol‐naïve, adolescent (male, n = 27; female, n = 23) and adult (male, n = 30; female, n = 30) HAP1 mice were randomly assigned to a stress or no stress group. The study consisted of 5 phases: (1) 10 consecutive days of exposure to a 30‐minute footshock session, (2) 1 startle test, (3) one 30‐minute footshock session immediately followed by 1 startle test, (4) 30 days of free‐choice alcohol consumption, and (5) one 30‐minute footshock session immediately followed by 1 startle test. Results: Footshock stress exposure during adolescence, but not adulthood, robustly increased alcohol drinking behavior in both male and female HAP1 mice. Before alcohol drinking, females in both the adolescent and adult stress groups showed greater startle in phases 2 and 3; whereas males in the adolescent stress group showed greater startle only in phase 3. After alcohol drinking, in phase 5, enhanced startle was no longer apparent in any stress group. Males in the adult stress group showed reduced startle in phases 2 and 5. PPI was generally unchanged, except that males in the adolescent stress group showed increased PPI in phase 3 and females in the adolescent stress group showed decreased PPI in phase 5. Conclusions: Adolescent HAP1 mice appear to be more vulnerable to the effects of footshock stress than adult mice, as manifested by increased alcohol drinking and anxiety‐related behavior in adulthood. These results in mice suggest that stress exposure during adolescence may increase the risk for developing an alcohol‐use and/or anxiety disorder in individuals with a genetic predisposition toward high alcohol consumption.     

Adolescent C57BL/6J mice show elevated alcohol intake, but reduced taste aversion, as compared to adult mice: a potential behavioral mechanism for binge drinking

Background: Binge alcohol drinking during adolescence is a serious health problem that may increase future risk of an alcohol use disorder. Although there are several different procedures by which to preclinically model binge‐like alcohol intake, limited‐access procedures offer the advantage of achieving high voluntary alcohol intake and pharmacologically relevant blood alcohol concentrations (BACs). Therefore, in the current study, developmental differences in binge‐like alcohol drinking using a limited‐access cycling procedure were examined. In addition, as alcohol drinking has been negatively correlated with sensitivity to the aversive properties of alcohol, we examined developmental differences in sensitivity to an alcohol‐induced conditioned taste aversion (CTA). Methods: Binge‐like alcohol consumption was investigated in adolescent (4 weeks) and adult (10 weeks) male C57BL/6J mice for 2 to 4 h/d for 16 days. Developmental differences in sensitivity to an alcohol‐induced CTA were examined in adolescent and adult mice, with saline or alcohol (3 or 4 g/kg) repeatedly paired with the intake of a novel tastant (NaCl). Results: Adolescent mice showed a significant increase in alcohol intake as compared to adults, with adolescents achieving higher BACs and increasing alcohol consumption over successive cycles of the binge procedure. Conversely, adolescent mice exhibited a dose‐dependent reduction in sensitivity to the aversive properties of alcohol, as compared to adult mice, with adolescent mice failing to develop a CTA to 3 g/kg alcohol. Finally, extinction of an alcohol CTA was observed following conditioning with a higher dose of alcohol in adolescent, versus adult, mice. Conclusions: These results indicate that adolescent mice consume more alcohol, per kilogram body weight, than adults in a binge‐like model of alcohol drinking and demonstrate a blunted sensitivity to the conditioned aversive effects of alcohol. Overall, this supports a behavioral framework by which heightened binge alcohol intake during adolescence occurs, in part, via a reduced sensitivity to the aversive properties of alcohol.     

Local cerebral glucose utilization rates in alcohol-naïve high-alcohol-drinking (HAD) and low-alcohol-drinking (LAD) rats

Background: The present study compared baseline local cerebral glucose utilization (LCGU) values within reward‐relevant brain regions in alcohol‐naïve, adult male high–alcohol‐drinking (HAD) and low–alcohol‐drinking (LAD) rats from replicate lines 1 and 2. Methods: 2‐[¹⁴C]Deoxyglucose ([¹⁴C]2‐DG) was injected (125 μCi/kg) intravenously during the rats’ dark cycle. Timed arterial blood samples were collected over 45 min and assayed for glucose as well as [¹⁴C]2‐DG content. Rats were then decapitated; their brains quickly removed and frozen in isopentane at ?50°C. Coronal sections from each brain were apposed to film and exposed for 2 days. Image densities were analyzed using quantitative autoradiography. Results: Data were collected from several key limbic (nucleus accumbens, ventral tegmental area, olfactory tubercle, amygdala, hippocampus, ventral pallidum, and septum), basal ganglia, cortical (medial prefrontal, frontal, parietal, temporal, occipital, entorhinal, pyriform, and cingulate), and subcortical (thalamus, habenula, and superior colliculus) structures. Because there were no significant differences between the replicates within each drinking line, data from the two replicates were combined to determine drinking line differences. When both replicate lines were combined, there were trends toward higher (approximately 15%) LCGU rates in HAD (n= 15) versus LAD (n= 16) rats within the parietal and occipital cortices, but neither of these line differences reached statistical significance (p < 0.01). Conclusions: The findings suggested that, within the HAD and LAD replicate rat lines, the selection for alcohol preference did not lead to differences in functional brain activity, as measured with the 2‐DG method.     

Further evidence of an inverse genetic relationship between innate differences in alcohol preference and alcohol withdrawal magnitude in multiple selectively bred rat lines

Background: We have previously shown that a genetic association exists between low alcohol drinking and high alcohol withdrawal magnitude after acute alcohol exposure in alcohol‐naïve rats. However, the behavioral rating scale used in this prior study was not optimal for assessing the magnitude of mild alcohol withdrawal. The present study examined whether a genetic relationship is again found between alcohol preference and alcohol withdrawal magnitude when a sensitive measure is used to index mild alcohol withdrawal in rats. Methods: Alcohol‐naïve, male rats selectively bred for alcohol preference (P, HAD1, HAD2) or nonpreference (NP, LAD1, LAD2) received a single intragastric infusion of alcohol (4.0 g/20.3 ml/kg body weight; 25% v/v) or water followed by acoustic startle testing. Results: Startle probability and magnitude was greater in water‐treated P than in water‐treated NP rats. During alcohol withdrawal, startle probability and magnitude was suppressed in P rats and elevated in NP rats relative to water‐treated controls. Startle probability and magnitude was greater in water‐treated LAD1 rats than in water‐treated HAD1 rats. During alcohol withdrawal, startle probability and magnitude was suppressed in HAD1 and elevated in LAD1 rats relative to water‐treated controls at 20 hr after acute alcohol exposure. Startle probability and magnitude did not differ between water‐treated HAD2 and water‐treated LAD2 rats. During alcohol withdrawal, there was a trend toward decreased startle probability and magnitude in HAD2 rats compared with water‐treated controls. Conclusions: The acoustic startle response to a tone stimulus is a sensitive measure of mild alcohol withdrawal in rats. Rats selectively bred for low alcohol intake showed greater alcohol withdrawal magnitude than did rats selectively bred for high alcohol intake. These results provide further evidence that an inverse genetic association exists between alcohol withdrawal magnitude and propensity toward alcohol drinking in rats.     

Genetic Selection for High and Low Alcohol Consumption in a Limited-Access Paradigm

BACKGROUND: Several rat lines have been bred for their differences in alcohol consumption based on a continuous-access paradigm in which alcohol solution is available 24 hr/day. The limited-access paradigm (LAP), in which access to alcohol solution is restricted to a short period per day, however, has been used extensively to investigate the neurochemical mechanisms underlying alcohol consumption. There is evidence of possible differences in genetic determination of alcohol drinking in a continuous- versus limited-access condition. For these reasons, selective breeding for high- and low-alcohol consumption (HARF and LARF, respectively) based on a LAP was conducted. METHODS: N/Nih rats were used as the breeding stock. A within-family breeding procedure was used to develop HARF and LARF lines with 10 families per line. Access to alcohol solution was restricted to 20 min/day. Alcohol was provided as 3%, 6% and 12% w/v solutions. Average intake of alcohol during the 12% phase was used as the selection criterion. Inbreeding began in the seventh generation. RESULTS: After the sixth generation of selection, rats from the HARF line consumed an average of 1.2 g/kg, whereas rats from the LARF line consumed an average of 0.6 g/kg of alcohol during the 20-min access period. Alcohol consumption remained stable over the next eight generations of inbreeding. In the continuous-access-drinking paradigm, the HARF and LARF rats consumed an average of 5.5 to 7.0 g/kg and 1.0 to 2.0 g/kg of alcohol per day respectively. An estimated heritability of 0.25 was obtained. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that alcohol drinking in the LAP is influenced by genetic factors. Differences in alcohol drinking in the LAP also generalize to continuous access drinking. These rat lines will be very useful for investigations into the genetic and neurochemical mechanisms underlying alcohol drinking.     

Genetic dissociation between ethanol sensitivity and rapid tolerance in mouse and rat strains selectively bred for differential ethanol sensitivity

BACKGROUND: The Inbred Long- and Short-Sleep mice (ILS and ISS) and the Inbred High- and Low-Alcohol-Sensitive rats (IHAS and ILAS) were selectively bred for differential alcohol sensitivity with use of the duration of loss-of-righting-reflex test (LORR), with the IHAS and ILS animals being much more sensitive than the ILAS and ISS animals, respectively. The current study was undertaken to determine whether acute sensitivity in these strains is genetically correlated to a rapid tolerance to alcohol, a form of tolerance that is evident 24 hr after a single alcohol dose. METHODS: Separate groups of animals were administered a single pretreatment dose of alcohol (0-6 g/kg for the mice; 0-4 g/kg for the rats). Alcohol sensitivity was tested 24 hr later with the LORR test, and blood ethanol concentration was tested at regain of righting (BECRR). Alcohol-induced hypothermia also was determined in the mice. Independently derived replicate rat strains were used for all experiments (IHAS1, ILAS1; IHAS2, ILAS2); no such replicates exist for the ILS and ISS strains. RESULTS: Alcohol pretreatment caused a dose-dependent decrease in LORR duration accompanied by an increase in BECRR in the ILS strain, but LORR increased in the ISS strain with no effect on BECRR. Both strains became hypothermic during the LORR test on day two, but the only significant effect of alcohol pretreatment was in the ISS strain, in which alcohol-induced hypothermia was enhanced. Alcohol pretreatment caused a significant dose-dependent decrease in LORR duration accompanied by an increase in BECRR in the IHAS1 but not in the IHAS2 strain. In contrast, ILAS1 and ILAS2 strains both showed a significant increase in LORR duration and also a significant increase in BECRR. CONCLUSIONS: Alcohol pretreatment caused a dose-dependent decrease in LORR duration and an increase in BECRR in the IHAS1 and ILS strain, suggesting the development of functional rapid tolerance. In contrast, LORR duration increased in the ILAS1, ILAS2, and ISS groups, but BECRR either increased (ILAS1, ILAS2) or did not change (ISS). These observations suggest that central nervous system sensitivity was decreased in the ILAS1 and ILAS2 groups (i.e., rapid functional tolerance) or unchanged in the ISS strain, but that some pharmacokinetic property also was altered in these strains. Overall, the results do not support a genetic relation between alcohol sensitivity and the development of rapid tolerance.     

Pharmacologic Dissociation Between Impulsivity and Alcohol Drinking in High Alcohol Preferring Mice

Background: Impulsivity is genetically correlated with, and precedes, addictive behaviors and alcoholism. If impulsivity or attention is causally related to addiction, certain pharmacological manipulations of impulsivity and/or attention may affect alcohol drinking, and vice versa. The current studies were designed to explore the relationship among impulsivity, drinking, and vigilance in selectively bred High Alcohol Preferring (HAP) mice, a line that has previously demonstrated both high impulsivity and high alcohol consumption. Amphetamine, naltrexone, and memantine were tested in a delay discounting (DD) task for their effects on impulsivity and vigilance. The same drugs and doses were also assessed for effects on alcohol drinking in a 2‐bottle choice test. Methods: HAP mice were subjected to a modified version of adjusting amount DD using 0.5‐second and 10‐second delays to detect decreases and increases, respectively, in impulsive responding. In 2 experiments, mice were given amphetamine (0.4, 0.8, or 1.2 mg/kg), naltrexone (3 and 10 mg/kg), and memantine (1 and 5 mg/kg) before DD testing. Another pair of studies used scheduled access, 2‐bottle choice drinking to assess effects of amphetamine (0.4, 1.2, or 3.0 mg/kg), naltrexone (3 and 10 mg/kg), and memantine (1 and 5 mg/kg) on alcohol consumption. Results: Amphetamine dose‐dependently reduced impulsivity and vigilance decrement in DD, but similar doses left alcohol drinking unaffected. Naltrexone and memantine decreased alcohol intake at doses that did not affect water drinking but had no effects on impulsivity or vigilance decrement in the DD task. Conclusions: Contrary to our hypothesis, none of the drugs tested here, while effective on either alcohol drinking or impulsivity, decreased both behaviors. These findings suggest that the genetic association between drinking and impulsivity observed in this population is mediated by mechanisms other than those targeted by the drugs tested in these studies.     

Low-dose stimulatory effects of ethanol during adolescence in rat lines selectively bred for high alcohol intake

Abstract : Background: The low‐dose stimulatory effect of ethanol (EtOH) in rats has been hypothesized to reflect its hedonic effects and to be associated with a genetic predisposition toward high alcohol preference. To test the hypothesis that phenotypes associated with high alcohol preference in adulthood are also present in adolescent rats at the time of onset of alcohol drinking, the current study examined the effects of EtOH on locomotor activity (LMA) during adolescence in lines of rats selectively bred for divergent alcohol intakes. Methods: Subjects were adolescent (31–40 days of age) rats from the alcohol‐preferring (P) and ‐nonpreferring (NP) lines and from the high–alcohol‐drinking (HAD) and low–alcohol‐drinking (LAD) replicate lines. On day 1, all subjects (n= 8–10/line/gender/dose) received intraperitoneal saline injections and were placed in the activity monitor for 30 min. On day 2, subjects received intraperitoneal saline or 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.0, or 1.5 g EtOH/kg. Results: The LMA of male and female P rats was increased with low doses (0.25–0.75 g/kg) and decreased at the highest dose (1.5 g/kg) of EtOH. Similar effects were observed with low doses of EtOH on the LMA of HAD‐1 and HAD‐2 rats. None of the EtOH doses stimulated LMA in the NP, LAD‐1, or LAD‐2 rats, although all of the low–alcohol‐intake lines of rats showed decreased LMA at the highest dose of EtOH. Only the P rats among the high–alcohol‐consuming lines of rats showed decreased LMA at the highest dose of EtOH. Conclusion: Selective breeding for high alcohol consumption seems to be associated with increased sensitivity to the low‐dose stimulating effects of EtOH and reduced sensitivity to the high‐dose motor‐impairing effects of ethanol. The expression of these phenotypes emerges during adolescence by the age of onset of alcohol‐drinking behavior.     

Acoustic startle reactivity during acute alcohol withdrawal in rats that differ in genetic predisposition toward alcohol drinking: effect of stimulus characteristics

BACKGROUND: We have previously reported an association between greater alcohol withdrawal magnitude after a single alcohol exposure and a genetic predisposition toward low alcohol drinking in rats selectively bred for differences in alcohol intake when acoustic startle reactivity to a tone stimulus was used to index acute alcohol withdrawal. The purpose of this study was to examine whether the quality of the acoustic startle stimulus (noise versus tone) is important for detecting a genetic relationship between alcohol withdrawal magnitude and alcohol drinking behavior. METHODS: Alcohol-naive male rats selectively bred for high alcohol intake [alcohol-preferring (P), high-alcohol-drinking (HAD)1, and HAD2] or low alcohol intake [alcohol-nonpreferring (NP), low-alcohol-drinking (LAD)1, and LAD2] received a single intragastric infusion of water or alcohol (4.0 g/20.3 ml/kg; 25% v/v), and acoustic startle test sessions were given at 14, 16, 18, 20, and 24 hr after infusion. Each test session consisted of a 5-min acclimation period followed by random presentation of various white noise stimuli (90, 100, 110, and 120 dB.) RESULTS: Line differences in acoustic startle magnitude under control conditions were present in all three pairs of selectively bred lines; P rats showed a greater startle magnitude relative to NP rats, whereas both LAD lines showed a greater startle magnitude relative to both HAD lines. During alcohol withdrawal, the P, HAD1, and HAD2 lines showed enhanced startle magnitude compared with their water-treated controls. No change in startle magnitude during alcohol withdrawal was found in the NP, LAD1, or LAD2 lines. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to our prior findings, these results showed a genetic association between high alcohol drinking and a greater startle response magnitude to a noise stimulus during alcohol withdrawal. It seems that the genetic association between alcohol drinking and alcohol withdrawal, as assessed by the acoustic startle response, depends on the quality of the acoustic startle stimulus.     

Voluntary ethanol drinking during the first three postnatal weeks in lines of rats selectively bred for divergent ethanol preference

BACKGROUND: Using a procedure first developed by Hall (1979), we examined ethanol self-administration in preweanling pups from Wistar rats and in lines of rats selectively bred for divergent ethanol preference (alcohol-preferring P, alcohol-nonpreferring NP, high-alcohol-drinking HAD-1 and -2, and low-alcohol-drinking LAD-2) to determine if factors contributing to high and low alcohol intakes are present early in development. METHODS: From postnatal days 5 to 20, nondeprived male and female rat pups received 30 min daily access to either water or a 15% (v/v) ethanol solution. In each daily session, pups were placed in a heated chamber containing Kimwipes soaked with a water or ethanol solution. Pups were weighed before and after each session, and intake levels were calculated as a percentage of body weight change. RESULTS: Similar to previous reports, Wistar pups exhibited over a 2-fold higher level of ethanol ingestion than water on postnatal days 9 through 14, with ethanol intakes approaching 3 g/kg body weight. When the drinking patterns of the selected lines were examined, only the HAD replicate lines showed a comparable preference for ethanol versus water during the preweanling period. The ethanol consumption of P, NP, and LAD lines was not consistently distinguishable from water intake levels. To reveal whether early ethanol exposure would influence later ethanol drinking behavior, a subset of HAD and LAD rat pups received free-choice ethanol access upon weaning. Although the divergent ethanol preference between high- and low-alcohol-drinking lines was evident within the first 4 days of access (>4 g/kg/day for HAD; <2 g/kg/day for LAD), preweanling ethanol exposure did not alter the acquisition or maintenance of ethanol drinking in either line. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these results suggest that (a) the enhanced ethanol ingestion observed during the middle portion of the preweanling period is a robust phenomenon and generalizes across nonselected strains of rats, (b) selective breeding for divergent alcohol preference has arrested this age-specific effect in all but the HAD lines of rats, and (c) early ethanol exposure does not alter genetic dispositions for later high or low alcohol preference.     

The Relationship Between Ethanol-induced Hyperglycemia and Hypothermia: Evidence of Genetic Correlation

The hyperglycemic and hypothermic responses to acute ethanol exposure (0, 2, 4, 6 g/kg, intraperitoneally) were examined in non-fasted mice selectively bred for sensitivity (COLD line) or insensitivity (HOT line) to ethanol-induced hypothermia. Blood samples and rectal temperatures were obtained immediately before injection and hourly for 4 hr after injection. As expected, COLD mice demonstrated greater and more prolonged reductions in body temperature than HOT mice, especially at the 4 g/kg dose (HOT: -2.58 degrees C, COLD: -5.08 degrees C). Ethanol produced significant dose-dependent elevations in blood glucose levels over the 4-hr sampling period in both lines. The greatest elevations in blood glucose levels were seen at 4 g/kg, with COLD mice (mean = 225.1 mg/dl) showing significantly greater elevations in blood glucose levels compared to HOT mice (mean = 177.0 mg/dl). These results support the hypothesis that the thermic and glycemic effects produced by ethanol are due to related neural processes that share a common genetic component.     

Effects of long-term episodic access to ethanol on the expression of an alcohol deprivation effect in low alcohol-consuming rats

Background: The alcohol‐preferring (P) and ‐nonpreferring (NP) and high alcohol–drinking (HAD) and low alcohol–drinking (LAD) rats have been selectively bred for divergent preference for ethanol over water. In addition, both P and HAD rats display an alcohol deprivation effect (ADE). This study was undertaken to test whether the NP, LAD‐1, and LAD‐2 lines of rats could display an ADE as well. Method: Adult female NP, LAD‐1, and LAD‐2 rats were given concurrent access to multiple concentrations of ethanol [5, 10, 15% (v/v)] and water in an ADE paradigm involving an initial 6 weeks of 24‐hr access to ethanol, followed by four cycles of 2 weeks of deprivation from and 2 weeks of re‐exposure to ethanol (5, 10, and 15%). A control group had continuous access to the ethanol concentrations (5, 10, and 15%) and water through the end of the fourth re‐exposure period. Results: For NP rats, a preference for the highest ethanol concentration (15%) was evident by the end of the fifth week of access (～60% of total ethanol fluid intake). Contrarily, LAD rats did not display a marked preference for any one concentration of ethanol. All three lines displayed an ADE after repeated cycles of re‐exposure to ethanol, with the general ranking of intake being LAD‐1 > NP > LAD‐2 (e.g., for the first day of reinstatement of the third re‐exposure cycle, intakes were 6.5, 2.9, and 2.4 g/kg/day compared with baseline values of 3.1, 2.0, and 1.3 g/kg/day for each line, respectively). By the 13th week, rats from all three lines, with a ranking of LAD‐1 > NP > LAD‐2, were drinking more ethanol (3.3, 2.2, and 2.0 g/kg/day, respectively) compared with their consumption during the first week of access (～1.1 g/kg/day for all three lines). Conclusion: These data indicate that access to multiple concentrations of ethanol and exposure to multiple deprivation cycles can partially overcome a genetic predisposition of NP, LAD‐1, and LAD‐2 rats for low alcohol consumption. In addition, the findings suggest that genetic control of low alcohol consumption in rats is not associated with the inability to display an ADE.     

Anxiety and sensitivity to ethanol and pentobarbital in alcohol withdrawal seizure-prone and withdrawal seizure-resistant mice

BACKGROUND: Withdrawal Seizure-Prone (WSP) and Withdrawal Seizure-Resistant (WSR) mice were selectively bred for high and low handling-induced convulsions, respectively, after chronic ethanol treatment. Withdrawal severity is one factor that may contribute to the development of alcoholism and/or substance abuse, and anxiety is another. We sought to explore whether these factors are genetically related. METHODS: WSP and WSR mice of two replicate pairs of selected lines were tested for anxiety-related behaviors on the canopy stretched-attend-posture apparatus 20 min after intraperitoneal injection of ethanol (2 g/kg, 20% v/v), pentobarbital (20 mg/kg), or an equivalent volume of saline. Dependent measures of anxiety included number of stretched attend postures (SAP) and time spent in the exposed area of the apparatus. Number of line crossings, which measures overall activity, was also scored. RESULTS: WSP mice given saline exhibited more SAP than WSR mice given saline, which indicated greater baseline anxiety. Ethanol and pentobarbital both reduced SAP and increased time spent in the exposed area of the apparatus, which indicated that both drugs exerted an anxiolytic effect. Despite baseline differences in SAP between selected lines, both anxiolytic drugs reduced SAP to similar levels in WSP and WSR mice. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the hypothesis that WSP mice are more sensitive than WSR mice to the anxiety-reducing effects of ethanol and pentobarbital. Some genes that influence this difference are likely to be the same as those that influence ethanol withdrawal severity. Thus, higher basal anxiety and greater genetic sensitivity to anxiolytic drug effects may relate to a greater genetic predisposition to the development of severe alcohol withdrawal signs.     

Acute Functional Tolerance to Ethanol and Fear Conditioning Are Genetically Correlated in Mice

It has been speculated that tolerance to alcohol involves some form of neuronal plasticity that is similar to or the same as that mediating learning and memory. To investigate this possibility further, we tested the hypothesis that acute functional tolerance (AFT) to alcohol is genetically correlated to a Pavlovian learning task fear conditioning. Mice selectively bred for differences in ability to acquire AFT were tested for fear conditioning. Subjects received a mild footshock paired to a broadband clicker and were tested 24 hr later for their freezing response to the conditioning chamber (context), to an altered chamber, and to the clicker. Both the original and replicate lines selected for high AFT (HAFT) were found to freeze significantly more than those selected for low AFT (HAFT) in response to the context and to the clicker. In a second experiment, an F₂ Population derived from the C57BL/6 (B6) and DBA/2 (D2) mouse strains were tested first for fear conditioning, followed 3 weeks later by AFT testing. AFT was defined as the difference between blood alcohol levels determined at the time of regain balance on a dowel rod first after 1.75 g/kg of ethanol and again after a subsequent dose of 2.0 g/kg. Consistent with results from HAFT and LAFT, freezing to context was found to be significantly positively correlated to AFT ( r = 0.38, p = 0.04) in the F₂ mice. The results suggest that co-variation in fear conditioning and AFT may be mediated by one or more of the Same or at least tightly linked genes. Further dissection of this correlation may reveal neuronal mechanisms common to both AFT and fear conditioning.