High-resolution carotid artery MRA. Comparison with fast dynamic acquistion and duplex ultrasound scanning

Purpose:
To determine whether the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) of the carotid arteries is improved by using a slow-injection, high-resolution technique. Material and Methods:
In 22 patients suspected to have internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis at duplex ultrasound scanning (DUS), CE-MRA was performed both with a fast, dynamic (8 s/phase) and with a slower, high-resolution technique (scan time 2:20 min). Results:
There was conformity between the CE-MRA techniques regarding the degree of stenosis in 34/40 extracranial ICAs. In 3/6 discrepant cases, short occlusions were seen with the fast dynamic technique, whereas both the high-resolution CE-MRA technique and DUS showed patent vessels. There was an overall tendency toward higher stenosis grading with the dynamic technique. Overlying veins could be removed on a workstation in all high-resolution examinations. Conclusion:
The high-resolution carotid CE-MRA technique proposed herein seems to improve the diagnostic accuracy, at least for differentiation between high-grade stenoses and occlusions.     

三维对比剂增强MR血管成像对颈部动脉病变的诊断价值

目的　分析三维对比剂增强MR血管成像 (3DCE MRA)显示的颈部动脉常见病变 ;与DSA比较 ,明确 3DCE MRA诊断颈部动脉病变的价值。方法　对 741例超声多普勒怀疑颈部动脉疾病的患者进行 3DCE MRA成像 ,并根据其病变表现总结分类。 2 0 6例病人同时行DSA检查 ,将颈部动脉分为颈总、颈内、颈外、锁骨下及椎动脉 5个部位 ,由 2位放射学专家独立评估DSA及 3DCE MRA血管资料。结果　 3 6 7%病例 (2 72 / 741)显示无异常。 63 2 9% (469/ 741)显示颈部动脉有病变 ,共计 82 7段 ,其中动脉粥样斑块占 3 4 2 2 % (2 83段 ) ,动脉狭窄占 3 4 46% (2 85段 ) ,动脉闭塞占 3 3 8% (2 8段 ) ,动脉发育纤细占 14 87% (12 3段 ) ;动脉开口变异占 3 87% (3 2段 ) ,动脉扭曲占 3 63 % (3 0段 ) ,动脉瘤占 0 72 % (6段 ) ,动脉夹层占 1 2 1% (10段 ) ,肿瘤包绕或推压动脉占 1 45% (12段 ) ,术后复查占2 18% (18段 )。对 2 0 6例的 412段血管与DSA比较 ,3DCE MRA在颈总动脉、颈内动脉及椎动脉的阳性检出率差异有显著性意义 (P <0 0 1) ,主要是对动脉粥样斑块 (2 56段与 2 83段 )和动脉狭窄 (2 58段与 2 85段 )存在一定的高估。但对 412段血管整个样本 ,两种方法在同一部位诊断各种血管病变差异无显著性意义 (P >0 0     

Doppler ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in assessing carotid artery stenosis

PURPOSE: This study prospectively compares Doppler ultrasound (Doppler US) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and endarterectomy findings to determine the accuracy in assessing carotid artery stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients underwent carotid endarterectomy, 21 studied with Doppler US, CE-MRA and DSA and 11 with Doppler US and CE-MRA. In 41 carotid arteries, the degree of stenosis was analysed with Doppler US and CE-MRA and compared with DSA by using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Nine out of 32 endarterectomies were done using the eversion technique, and it was possible to compare Doppler US, CE-MRA and DSA with the specimen measurement. Twenty-three out of 32 endarterectomies were done using the standard technique, and the presence of ulcers was documented. RESULTS: There was a significant Doppler US/DSA (Rs=0.86; p<0.001) and CE-MRA/DSA (Rs=0.81; p<0.001) correlation for the degree of stenosis. The diagnostic accuracy of the three methods was the same (89%). Ulcers were most frequently seen at CE-MRA, with a diagnostic accuracy of 85%. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that endarterectomy on the basis of Doppler US and CE-MRA can be considered appropriate. CEMRA was the best noninvasive imaging modality to detect plaque ulceration.     

Time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: diagnostic accuracy and inter-observer variability compared with selective catheter angiography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) in a time-resolved technique compared with digital subtraction angiography (x-ray DSA) in patients with suspected stenoses of the internal carotid artery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 43 patients were enrolled in this prospective study. All patients underwent selective x-ray DSA involving a total of 84 carotid arteries. CE-MRA was performed in a time-resolved technique with a fast gradient-echo sequence on a 1.5 T MR scanner: TR 3.8 milliseconds, TE 1.49 milliseconds. Four consecutive measurements, each a duration of 10 seconds, were performed with omission of measuring bolus transit time. Four independent radiologists scored the degree of stenosis. The interobserver variability was calculated for CE-MRA and x-ray DSA. RESULTS: In the 43 cases, at least one MRA measurement showed arterial contrast without venous degradation. Compared with x-ray DSA the mean sensitivity and specificity for grading stenosis > or = 70% were 98% and 86%, respectively. The interobserver agreement was substantial with no significant difference between CE-MRA (kappa value 0.794) and x-ray DSA (kappa value 0.786). CONCLUSIONS: The short acquisition time of a fast CE-MRA sequence allows a selective visualization of the internal carotid arteries without degradation from venous enhancement. It is a reliable method with a good interobserver agreement.     

3.0T高分辨率CE-MRA对颈部血管狭窄的诊断价值

目的探讨三维对比增强磁共振血管成像(3D CE-MRA)在颈部动脉血管狭窄诊断中的临床应用价值。方法对23例临床拟诊颈部动脉血管狭窄行数字减影血管造影(DSA)的患者行颈部3D CE-MRA。将两种方法检查结果进行相关性比较。结果 23例患者共230个节段血管,3D CE-MRA显示了227个节段,共诊断出74处(32.6%)狭窄,其中28处轻度狭窄,22处中度狭窄,20处重度狭窄,4处闭塞;DSA共显示了230个节段的血管,共诊断出69处(30.4%)血管狭窄,其中24处轻度狭窄,23处中度狭窄,19处重度狭窄,3处闭塞。与DSA相比,3DCE-MRA对颈部动脉轻度、中度、重度狭窄及动脉闭塞的显示敏感性均为100%,特异性分别为85.71%、90.91%、90%和75%,两种检查方法对颈部动脉狭窄程度的判断有良好的一致性(κ=0.921,P=0.000)。结论 3.0T 3DCE-MRA能够可靠的评价颈部动脉狭窄性病变,基本可以替代DSA检查。     

CE-MRA在颈动脉狭窄中诊断价值的研究

目的探讨对比增强磁共振血管造影(CE-MRA)对颈动脉狭窄及狭窄程度的诊断价值。资料与方法对54例有临床缺血症状的患者行CE-MRA检查后1周内行DSA检查,将其颈动脉影像学结果进行比较。结果 CE-MRA对颈动脉狭窄的敏感性、特异性、假阴性、假阳性和诊断符合率分别为94.12%、91.89%、5.88%、8.11%和92.59%;对狭窄程度进行分级后再次进行准确性的比较,发现CE-MRA对颈动脉狭窄的敏感性、特异性、假阴性、假阳性和诊断符合率分别为91.67%、80.95%、8.33%、19.15%和83.33%;将正常血管剔除后进行狭窄程度准确性比较,其诊断符合率为55%。结论 CE-MRA可作为颈动脉狭窄的一种筛查手段,但仍无法准确评价颈动脉狭窄的程度。     

Direct B-mode NASCET-style stenosis measurement and Doppler ultrasound as parameters for assessment of internal carotid artery stenosis

Doppler ultrasound grading of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis using the two parameters of spectral analysis and internal carotid to common carotid artery peak systolic velocity (ICA/CCA PSV) ratio is well established. The improvements in B-Mode ultrasound image quality now make direct ultrasound NASCET-style stenosis measurement possible. We demonstrate that longitudinal B-mode imaging can produce accurate North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) style measurements which have good correlation with angiographic images. Ultrasound B-mode stenosis measurement provides a third parameter which can be used in conjunction with the two Doppler parameters for the assessment of ICA stenosis. Taking the highest grade of stenosis of the three parameters produces a sensitivity of 100% for the detection of greater than 50% and greater than 80% stenosis with specificity of 66 and 90%, respectively. The performance of satisfactory B-mode imaging against digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was very encouraging. When the B-mode stenosis measurement showed a normal ICA, the positive predictive value (PPV) of the DSA being normal was 94%. When the B-mode stenosis measurement was 35% or less, the PPV of the DSA stenosis being 35% or less was 93%. These excellent results support the use of good quality B-Mode NASCET style stenosis measurement as the initial ultrasound measurement, with Doppler ultrasound only being performed when the B-mode stenosis measurement is greater than 35% or if the B-mode image is unsatisfactory. This approach would save considerable time enabling better utilization of ultrasound resources.     

Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis

PURPOSE: To assess accuracy of contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography as compared with three-dimensional (3D) time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography and reference digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Enhanced and 3D TOF MR angiography and DSA were performed in 51 consecutive patients suspected of having carotid artery stenosis at duplex ultrasonography. Stenoses were measured by two independent observers blinded to clinical information and other test results. Pearson correlation coefficients were used, and kappa for interobserver variabilities was estimated. Sensitivity and specificity of enhanced and 3D TOF MR angiography were calculated and compared with those of DSA. RESULTS: Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.94 (P <.01) for enhanced angiography versus DSA, 0.92 (P <.01) for 3D TOF angiography versus DSA, and 0.93 (P <.01) for enhanced versus 3D TOF angiography for observer 1 and 0.94 (P <.01), 0.95 (P <.01), and 0.94 (P <.01), respectively, for observer 2. kappa statistics were 0.81 for enhanced angiography, 0.79 for 3D TOF angiography, and 0.78 for DSA. Stenosis measurements of observer 1 at enhanced MR angiography, with inclusion of carotid arteries on the symptomatic side only, compared with those of DSA yielded a sensitivity of 90% (95% CI: 68%, 99%) and a specificity of 77% (95% CI: 55%, 92%). 3D TOF angiography yielded a sensitivity of 86% (95% CI: 67%, 97%) and a specificity of 73% (95% CI: 50%, 89%) compared with those of DSA. For observer 2, sensitivity and specificity for enhanced angiography were 91% (95% CI: 70%, 99%) and 76% (95% CI: 52%, 91%), respectively, and 90% (95% CI: 68%, 99%) and 77% (95% CI: 51%, 92%), respectively, for 3D TOF angiography. CONCLUSION: Accuracy of enhanced MR angiography in diagnosis of severe stenosis is similar to that of 3D TOF MR angiography.     

MR和CT血管造影在诊断颈动脉狭窄及内膜切除术后随访中的价值

目的 探讨磁共振血管造影（MRA）、CT血管造影（CTA）在诊断颈动脉狭窄及内膜切除术后随访中的价值。方法 11例22支颈动脉行MRA、CTA、CT仿真内窥镜（CTVE）、多普勒超声（DUS）检查。12支结果与DSA对照。3支颈动脉重度狭窄者行内膜切除术,MRA采用二维、三维时间飞越法。CTA经最大强度投影（MIP）及遮盖表现显示法（SSD）三维重建。应用导航功能行CTVE成像。结果 颈动脉轻度狭窄8支,中度狭窄3支,重度狭窄5支,闭塞1支,5支正常。12支颈动脉与DSA对照：CTA评估血管狭窄与DSA相符者11支,MRA与DSA相符者9支,DUS与DSA相符者7支。CTA、CTVE显示斑块、壁血栓6支,3支手术证实。术后MRA示狭窄解除,CTA示斑块消失。结论 MRA、DUS可用于颈动脉狭窄的筛选及术后随访。CTA评估血管狭窄程度与DSA、手术比较有较好的一致性,并能直接显示钙化斑块。     

Evaluation of semiautomated internal carotid artery stenosis quantification from 3-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiograms

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The performance of a semiautomatic technique for internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis quantification of the internal carotid artery in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The degree of stenosis of 52 ICAs was quantified by measuring the cross-sectional area along the center lumen line. This was performed both by 3 independent observers and the semiautomated method. The degree of stenosis was defined as the amount of cross-sectional lumen reduction. RESULTS: Agreement between the method and observers was good (weighted-kappa, kappaW = 0.89). Reproducibility of measurements of the semiautomated technique was better (kappaW = 0.97) than that of the observers (kappaW = 0.76), and the evaluated technique was considerably less time-consuming. CONCLUSIONS: Because the user interaction is limited, this technique can be used to replace an expert observer in 3-dimensional stenosis quantification of the ICA at CE-MRA in clinical practice.     

Diagnosis of internal carotid artery stenosis greater than 70% with power Doppler duplex sonography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Duplex sonography is an effective tool for evaluating internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis, and power Doppler imaging has improved its value in this regard. Our goal was to elucidate which parameters, such as linear stenosis, area stenosis, and peak systolic velocity (PSV), are the most reliable predictors of ICA stenosis greater than 70% using the method proposed by the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET). METHODS: Duplex sonography with power Doppler imaging and cerebral angiography were performed prospectively in 75 patients (135 vessels). The grade of stenosis on angiograms was calculated by the NASCET method, and linear stenosis, area stenosis, and PSV were measured in the most stenotic part of the ICA. RESULTS: Angiography revealed 20 ICA vessels with stenosis greater than 70%. The correlation between angiographic stenosis and linear stenosis, area stenosis, and PSV was .82, .78, and .84, respectively. A sensitivity-specificity curve analysis determined optimal threshold values of linear stenosis, area stenosis, and PSV as predictors of ICA stenosis greater than 70% as 74.7%, 83.3%, and 200 cm/s, respectively. Calculations of positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy using the optimal threshold values were 90.5%, 99.1%, and 97.8% for linear stenosis; 76.0%, 99.1%, and 94.8% for area stenosis; and 100%, 100%, and 100% for PSV. CONCLUSION: All parameters corresponded relatively well with angiographic stenosis. In particular, PSV greater than 200 cm/s was the most reliable predictor of ICA stenosis greater than 70%. We believe that the combination of parameters plays a crucial role in the accurate assessment of ICA stenosis.     

Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supra-aortic vessels in 24 seconds: a feasibility study

A contrast-enhanced, gradient-echo 3D pulse sequence providing angiographic information in 24 s was tested in five healthy subjects and used prospectively in 21 patients for the investigation of the cervical arteries. Indications included suspected stenosis of the carotid (in 13), or vertebral arteries (in 1), carotid dissection (3), variants of the branches of the aortic arch (2) and extracranial carotid aneurysms (2). The results in all patients were compared with those of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA). In patients with carotid stenosis, they were also compared with high-resolution 3D time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography (MRA). Good quality MR angiograms of the neck vessels were obtained with the fast 3D sequence in 20 of the 21 patients. One claustrophobic patient was unable to co-operate. The degree of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis was graded correctly (compared to DSA) in 21 of 24 cases (87.5 %). Two mild stenoses were overestimated as moderate using the fast MR sequence and one high-grade stenosis was misdiagnosed as a complete occlusion. Carotid dissection was confirmed in one case and correctly excluded in two. Four extracranial ICA aneurysms in two patients, arterial variants and stenosis of the origin of the vertebral artery were correctly diagnosed using the contrast-enhanced MR angiogram. Three-dimensional TOF MRA was unsuccessful due to motion artefacts in half of the cases of ICA stenosis. Received: 6 August 1998 Accepted: 21 December 1998     

The inter-sonographer reliability of carotid duplex ultrasound

Carotid duplex ultrasound (CDUS) is a non-invasive technique used to assess the severity of carotid artery stenosis. It has been shown to have good correlation with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) but has been criticised for its variability. One source of this is the variation in results between studies responsible for re-validating velocity criteria to match the established treatment thresholds of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. The aim of this study was to develop velocity criteria and determine the presence of inter-sonographer variation of CDUS when grading ICA stenosis in our department. Five sonographers measured the degree of ICA stenosis with CDUS in 33 patients who also underwent DSA. Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis was used to develop optimal velocity criteria for the 50%, 70% and 90% ICA stenosis thresholds as a group and for each individual sonographer. A peak systolic velocity ratio of > or = 3.25 was shown to have the highest accuracy (91.5%) for predicting a 70% stenosis. A moderate value of kappa (0.53 +/- 0.027) was calculated if the optimum velocity criterion was employed for each sonographer. There was no significant variation between the ability of sonographers to grade ICA stenosis (P > 0.05) and an excellent ICC of 0.911 was calculated. This study provides evidence to suggest that CDUS in our department is not an operator-dependant test for the investigation of ICA stenosis.     

Magnetic resonance angiography with contrast media in the study of carotid arteries

PURPOSE: Purpose of our study was to determine the feasibility and accuracy of contrast enhanced Turbo-MRA (CE-MRA) in the evaluation of patients with carotid artery stenosis, using a dynamic technique with multiple acquisitions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 37 patients with suspected carotid artery stenosis were studied with a 1.5 T magnet (Siemens Vision Plus) using, with a neck phased array coil, a dynamic tridimensional T1 weighted spoiled GRE (TR/TE/NEX: 3.8/1.4/1; Matrix = 110 x 160; FOV = 163 x 260 mm TA = 10 seconds for each sequence); 4 consecutive sequences were performed during the same breath hold, acquired after i.v. bolus injection with a power injector (Spectris, Medrad) of 15 ml of Gd-DTPA followed by 10 ml of saline solution (flow rate 2 ml/s). The beginning of the sequence coincided with the injection of Gd-DTPA. Images were reconstructed using a standard MIP algorithm, by selecting which of the sequences provided the highest enhancement. In all patients a DSA was also performed. Images were separately evaluated using conventional angiography as the gold standard and assessed for degree of stenosis by using NASCET criteria, and morphology of the plaque. RESULTS: CE-MRA correctly evaluated the degree of stenosis in 71 of the 74 patients, while overestimated the remaining 3 cases correctly evaluated by DSA. In 12 cases ulcerations were adequately demonstrated by one of the radiologist, while 11 on 12 were depicted by the other one. CE MRA allowed to detect tandem lesions of the internal carotid arteries (by both radiologists) in 13 of 74 carotids studied. Stenosis at the origin of the common carotid arteries were correctly detected in 9 cases. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were respectively of 98, 97 and 99%. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: In order to perform an optimal CE-MRA a dynamic technique must be performed to avoid venous filling. The possibility to use ultrafast imaging allows to selectively image the carotid arteries without jugular filling. The well known tendency to overestimate the degree of stenosis has not been found in this group of patients. CE-MRA is a rapid, reliable method to evaluate patients with suspected carotid artery stenosis. These results allow to consider dynamic CE-MRA as a valid method for direct imaging of the carotid arteries.     

Stenosis detection in forearm hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulae by multiphase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: preliminary experience

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and accuracy of multiphase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) in patients with dysfunctioning hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulae (AVF), using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the standard of reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with dysfunctioning AVF (eight radiocephalic and seven graft AVF) underwent CE-MRA. Dysfunction was defined as a flow decline of more than 25% in 1 month measured by dilutional flow measurements. CE-MRA was performed during injection of 35 mL of gadolinium-DTPA. The CE-MRA sequence consisted of a time-resolved series of 10 scans, each lasting approximately 10 seconds. The technical parameters were TR/TE/FA/voxel = 5.4/1.6/40/3.1 mm(3), and a rectangular surface reception coil was used. All patients were scheduled to undergo DSA at which an intervention was carried out when a stenosis >or=50% was seen. Two observers, unaware of each other's findings and the findings at DSA, quantified the number and degree of stenosis in the failing AVF. Image quality for CE-MRA and DSA was scored on a 3-point scale. The diagnostic performance of CE-MRA was analyzed with receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: CE-MRA and DSA examinations were performed without side effects in all 15 patients. Image quality was scored significantly better on CE-MRA (observer 1: CE-MRA, 2.0; DSA, 1.3; P =.001; observer 2: CE-MRA, 2.0; DSA, 1.4; P =.002). Interobserver agreement for detection of >or=50% stenosis was 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.71-0.92) for CE-MRA and 0.69 (95% CI = 0.55-0.84) for DSA. ROC analysis revealed a mean area under the curve of 0.78. On the patient level, at the >or=50% threshold, mean sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were 100% (95% CI = 69%-100%), 10% (95% CI = 0%-78%), 70% (95% CI = 38%-92%), and 100% (95% CI = 50%-100%), respectively. At the >or=75% threshold, mean sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 75% (95% CI = 20%-99%), 78% (95% CI = 39%-98%), 55% (95% CI = 12%-96%), and 89% (95% CI = 52%-100%), respectively. CONCLUSION: CE-MRA is a useful diagnostic tool for detecting stenoses in flow-declined hemodialysis AVF prior to interventional DSA.     

Maximum internal carotid arterial stenosis: assessment with rotational angiography versus conventional intraarterial digital subtraction angiography

PURPOSE: To assess how often rotational angiography depicts more severe internal carotid arterial stenosis compared with conventional intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in two or three projections and how frequently this factor may affect patient treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rotational angiography (16 or 32 projections) was performed in addition to DSA in 47 stenotic internal carotid arteries (ICAs) in 38 symptomatic patients. ICA stenosis was measured independently at DSA and at rotational angiography with North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria. The degree of stenosis was categorized as 0%-29%, 30%-49%, 50%-69%, or 70%-99%. RESULTS: In three ICAs, rotational angiography was nondiagnostic. In 28 of the remaining 44 ICAs, the degree of stenosis was categorized similarly with DSA and rotational angiography, whereas with rotational angiography, 15 ICAs were classified one category higher and one ICA was classified two categories higher, owing to the increased number of projections available. Seventy percent to 99% stenosis was demonstrated in 18 ICAs with DSA and in 25 ICAs with rotational angiography. Thus, rotational angiography could have facilitated a change in the optimal treatment (from nonsurgical treatment to carotid arterial endarterectomy) in seven ICAs. CONCLUSION: Compared with DSA in two or three projections, rotational angiography frequently depicts more severe ICA stenosis. This indicates a limitation of DSA in depicting the maximum ICA stenosis.     

Doppler sonographic parameters for detection of carotid stenosis: is there an optimum method for their selection?

OBJECTIVE: A wide range of Doppler threshold values for carotid stenosis is found in the literature. We undertook this study to compare methods of derivation and to determine if an optimum strategy of threshold selection exists for a high-risk population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From the sonograms of all patent internal carotid arteries, peak systolic velocity in the internal carotid artery (ICA(PSV)) and the ratio of peak systolic velocity in the internal carotid artery to that of the common carotid artery (ICA(PSV)/ CCA(PSV)) were compared with the percentage of angiographically determined stenosis. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated for levels of stenosis > or =60% and > or =70%. Doppler thresholds were chosen on the basis of maximum accuracy and on the basis of > or =90% sensitivity and specificity. Patients were then segregated into symptomatic and asymptomatic cohorts, and the above process was repeated. An effectiveness analysis was also conducted using various Doppler thresholds. Thresholds derived using these three methods were compared and optimal values chosen. RESULTS. Of 333 carotid arteries that fit inclusion criteria, 132 were found in asymptomatic patients and 201 in symptomatic patients. Maximum accuracy, > or =90% sensitivity and specificity, and effectiveness analysis each produced different ranges of thresholds. We chose final thresholds that maintained patient outcome profiles. For asymptomatic patients at the > or =60% stenosis level, thresholds were ICA(PSV) = 200 cm/sec and ICA(PSV)/CCA(PSV) = 3.0. For symptomatic patients with stenosis > or =70%, thresholds were ICA(PSV) = 175 cm/sec and ICA(PSV)/CCA(PSV) = 2.5. CONCLUSION: Considerable latitude exists in the choice of carotid Doppler thresholds. We propose a rational strategy for threshold selection based on a combination of three commonly used methods. Our observations indicate that it appears advisable to consider symptomatic and asymptomatic patients separately and to apply appropriately derived thresholds.     

对比剂增强的磁共振血管成像技术对比数字减影血管造影在颈部动脉诊断中的应用

目的：回顾性分析透视触发对化剂增强的磁共振血管成像（CE-MRA）技术对颈部血管的应用,与数字减影血管造影（DSA）对比,探讨其敏感性及应用价值。方法收集2011-2012年经MRA检查患者中临床表现有脑供血异常,疑颅内、颈内动脉或椎动脉狭窄、均进行透视触发CE-MRA和DSA检查的病例资料共28例进行分析。结果 CE-MRA检出狭窄部位30处,其中狭窄程度50％以上14处,完全闭塞6处,50％以下10处。 DSA检出狭窄部位28处,其中狭窄程度50％以上8处,完全闭塞4处,50％以下16处。2处MRA疑轻度狭窄,DSA未见异常;2处MRA示完全闭塞（颈内动脉）,而DSA示狭窄率90％以上。结论透视触发CE-MRA简便易行,敏感性与特异性均较高,可以作为可疑颈部及颅内动脉狭窄患者的首选检查方法。     

Multidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether and to what extent greater number of projection images obtained at three-dimensional (3D) time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography versus conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) causes overestimation of internal carotid arterial (ICA) stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DSA (two or three projections), rotational angiography (16 or 32 projections), and 3D TOF MR angiography (12 projections) were performed in 47 stenotic ICAs of 38 symptomatic patients. Two observers independently measured maximum stenosis, and the mean differences among MR angiography, DSA, and rotational angiography were compared. RESULTS: Three rotational and five MR angiograms were nondiagnostic. Seven MR angiograms of ICA stenoses showed a signal void and were excluded from analysis. On the remaining 32 angiograms, mean differences in maximum stenosis for observers 1 and 2, respectively, were 7% (95% CI: 3%, 12%) and 8% (95% CI: 3%, 13%) at MR angiography versus DSA and 2% (95% CI: -2%, 7%) and -1% (95% CI: -5%, 3%) at MR angiography versus rotational angiography. ICA stenosis was graded significantly higher at MR angiography versus DSA, whereas, it was not overestimated at MR angiography versus rotational angiography. The difference in maximum stenosis at MR angiography versus DSA was significantly different from that of MR angiography versus rotational angiography. CONCLUSION: Apparent overestimation of ICA stenosis at 3D TOF MR angiography versus conventional DSA may be partly explained by the greater number of projection images available at 3D TOF MR angiography.     

颈动脉增强对评价颈动脉斑块稳定性的作用

目的:通过分析颈动脉粥样硬化(AS)血管壁的强化特征,评价血管壁强化程度与斑块稳定性之间的关系.方法:148例临床疑为颈部血管狭窄的患者中61例行CTA、87例行CE-MRA检查,分析斑块的类型并测量邻近血管壁的强化程度以及管腔狭窄程度,评价管壁强化特征与斑块稳定性之间的关系.CTA组部分患者与DSA对照.结果:CTA组:狭窄血管74支,轻度狭窄34支,中度狭窄24支,重度狭窄19支,3支完全闭塞;软斑块32块,硬斑块25块,溃疡斑6块,软斑块处血管壁强化明显高于硬斑块,部分患者与DSA比较,二种检查方法对血管狭窄的显示无显著性差异.CE-MRA组:狭窄血管79支,轻度狭窄28支,中度狭窄33支,重度狭窄13支,5支完全闭塞;软斑块28块,硬斑块49块,血栓2块,软斑块处血管壁强化明显高于硬斑块.结论:CTA和CE-MRA在评价颈动脉粥样硬化斑块的稳定性方面各有优势,能够为临床预测缺血性脑卒中提供非常可靠准确的信息.