Globus pallidus internus deep brain stimulation for dystonic conditions: a prospective audit.

In the current era of functional surgery for movement disorders, deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) is emerging as the favoured target in the treatment of patients with dystonia. The results of 25 consecutive patients with medically intractable dystonia (12 with generalised dystonia, 7 with spasmodic torticollis, and 6 with other types of dystonia) treated with GPi stimulation are reported. Although comparisons were limited by differences in their respective neurological rating scales, chronic DBS benefited all groups, resulting in clear and progressive improvements in their condition. This study clearly demonstrates that DBS of the GPi provides amelioration of intractable dystonia.     

Micro lesion effect of the globus pallidus internus and outcome with deep brain stimulation in patients with Parkinson disease and dystonia

To determine whether the immediate response to electrode implantation (micro lesion effect, MLE) in the internal segment of the globus pallidus (GPi) predicts symptom improvement with deep brain stimulation (DBS) at 6 months in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) or generalized dystonia. Electrode implantation in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) prior to electrical stimulation has been reported to predict a beneficial effect of DBS in patients with PD, but whether this is also the case for the GPi in either PD or dystonia patients has not been established. We studied 20 patients (11 with PD and 9 with dystonia) who underwent electrode implantation in the GPi. Effects were assessed using standardized scales after 24 hours, weekly for 3 weeks prior to starting DBS, and after 6 months of DBS. 10 of 11 PD and 8 of 9 dystonia cases who benefited from electrode implantation also showed improvement in all motor and disability scores after 6 months of DBS of the GPi. One dystonia patient who did not show MLE benefited from DBS. The presence of MLE after electrode implantation in the GPi may help predict motor benefit from DBS in PD and generalized dystonia patients. © 2009 Movement Disorder Society     

Deep brain stimulation in the treatment of severe dystonia

A retrospective study of a consecutive series of 19 patients with medically intractable dystonia treated with uni- or bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) is reported. A minimal follow-up of 6 months was available, up to eleven years in one patient. The first twelve consecutive patients (4 with primary and 8 with secondary dystonia) were treated with chronic stimulation of the posterior part of the ventrolateral thalamic nucleus (VLp). In this group global functional outcome was improved in 8 patients, although dystonia movement and disability scale scores did not show significant improvement. Of the 12 patients treated first by VLp DBS, three (1 primary and 2 secondary dystonia) underwent pallidal (GPi) DBS after the VLp DBS failed to improve their symptoms. The last seven consecutive patients (5 primary and 2 secondary dystonia) were treated directly with GPi DBS. Extracranial infection prevented chronic GPi DBS in one patient. In another GPi patient, preliminary negative tests with the electrodes discouraged implantation of the stimulators, and the patient was not treated with chronic DBS. In the remaining group of eight patients including those previously treated with VLp DBS, chronic GPi DBS resulted in a significant improvement in the dystonia movement scale and disability scores. Although this is a retrospective study dealing with dystonia of heterogeneous etiology, the results strongly suggest that GPi DBS has a better outcome than VLp DBS Received: 22 January 2001 / Received in revised form: 28 February 2001 / Accepted: 1 March 2001     

Deep brain stimulation in the treatment of torticollis and Meige syndrome

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established and accepted treatment modality of generalized dystonia. The stereotactic target to be approached with DBS leads is the internal segment of the globus pallidus (GPi). Bilateral GPi stimulation in patients suffering from primary generalized dystonia reduced dystonic movement not only in the trunk and limbs but also in the neck and face. These observations have led to the use of GPi stimulation in patients with severe torticollis and Meige syndrome refractory to pharmacological agents as well to botulinum toxin injections. An increasing number of reports indicate the effectiveness of GPi stimulation in the treatment of intractable focal and segmental dystonia. Moreover, DBS can be performed simultaneously on both sides during one operative session. This treatment modality is reversible and safer when compared to stereotactic ablative techniques. In future, DBS can become an alternative treatment for intractable focal and segmental dystonia.     

Pallidal stimulation modifies after-effects of paired associative stimulation on motor cortex excitability in primary generalised dystonia

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) on motor cortex plasticity in patients with primary generalised dystonia. METHODS: We studied 10 patients with primary generalised dystonia (5 DYT1+, 5 idiopathic, 5 female, mean age 42) following GPi DBS and 10 healthy subjects. Motor cortex plasticity was assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) paired associative stimulation (PAS) of motor cortex and median nerve, a method which has been shown in healthy subjects to produce LTP-like effects. Thresholds and TMS intensity to produce a resting motor evoked potential (MEP) of 1 mV were determined. Resting MEP amplitude and stimulus response curves were recorded before and after PAS. Patients were recorded ON and OFF DBS in separate sessions. RESULTS: The mean TMS intensity to produce a resting MEP of 1 mV was 54% of maximum stimulator output when OFF and 52% ON DBS. Fifteen minutes after PAS the resting MEP amplitude increased in patients OFF DBS and in control subjects whereas it decreased in patients ON DBS. Similarly, after PAS, the mean amplitude of the stimulus response curve increased OFF DBS, but this effect was abolished with DBS ON. Furthermore, patients who had the largest clinical response to chronic DBS also had the largest difference in the effect of PAS with DBS ON vs. OFF. CONCLUSIONS: After PAS, patients with primary generalised dystonia showed a similar pattern of increased motor cortex excitability as healthy subjects when GPi DBS was OFF but not with GPi DBS ON. These results suggest that GPi DBS may reduce LTP-like motor cortex plasticity, which could contribute to its mechanism of action in dystonia.     

Pallidal deep brain stimulation relieves camptocormia in primary dystonia

Camptocormia, characterised by a forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine may occur in various movement disorders, mainly in Parkinson’s disease or in primary dystonia. In severe cases, patients with camptocormia are unable to walk. While treatment options are limited, deep brain stimulation (DBS) with bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus or globus pallidus internus (GPi) has been proposed as a therapeutic option in refractory cases of Parkinson’s disease. Here we present two patients with severe camptocormia as an isolated form of dystonia and as part of generalised dystonia, respectively, which were both treated with bilateral stimulation of the GPi. Symptoms of dystonia were assessed using the Burke–Fahn–Marsden dystonia rating scale (BFM) before and during deep brain stimulation. In both patients there was a significant functional improvement following long-term bilateral GPi stimulation and both patients gained ability to walk. In the first patient with an isolated dystonic camptocormia the BFM motor subscore for the truncal flexion improved by 75 %. The total BFM motor score in the second patient with a camptocormia in generalised dystonia improved by 45 %, while the BFM score for truncal flexion improved by 87 %. In both patients the effect of the bilateral GPi stimulation on camptocormia was substantial, independent of generalisation of dystonia. Therefore, GPi DBS is a possible treatment option for this rare disease.     

Pallidal deep brain stimulation in patients with cranial-cervical dystonia (Meige syndrome).

Idiopathic cranial-cervical dystonia (ICCD) is an adult-onset dystonia syndrome affecting orbicularis oculi, facial, oromandibular, and cervical musculature. ICCD is frequently difficult to treat medically. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) is a highly effective treatment for idiopathic generalized dystonia, however less is known about the effect of GPi DBS on ICCD. In this article, we present the results from a pilot study assessing the effect of GPi DBS in a series of patients with ICCD. Six patients underwent bilateral stereotactic implantation of DBS leads into the sensorimotor GPi. Patients were evaluated with the Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating scale (BFMDRS) and Toronto western spamodic torticollis rating scale (TWSTRS) before surgery and 6 months postoperatively. At 6 months, patients showed a 72% mean improvement in the BFMDRS total movement score (P < 0.028, Wilcoxin signed rank test). The mean BFMDRS disability score showed a trend toward improvement (P < 0.06). The total TWSTRS score improved 54% (P < 0.043). Despite improvement in dystonia, mild worsening of motor function was reported in previously nondystonic body regions with stimulation in 4 patients. Although GPi DBS was effective in these patients, the influence of GPi DBS on nondystonic body regions deserves further investigation.     

Changes in blink reflex excitability after globus pallidus internus stimulation for dystonia.

A pathophysiological feature of dystonia is reduced inhibition at various levels of the nervous system, which may be detected in clinically unaffected body parts. Chronic deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) has emerged as an effective treatment for primary torsion dystonia (PTD), although its mechanism of action and impact on inhibitory abnormalities in dystonia are unknown. We sought to understand the effect of GPi DBS on brainstem excitability in patients with PTD. We measured the blink reflex from orbicularis oculi in response to paired electrical stimulation of the supraorbital nerve at interstimulus intervals of 500 and 1,000 milliseconds in 10 patients with PTD before and at intervals of 1, 3, and 6 months after bilateral GPi DBS and in 10 healthy subjects. Patients were clinically evaluated using the Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating scale. We found R2 inhibition was significantly decreased in PTD patients compared with control subjects and progressively increased after GPi DBS, which correlated with clinical improvement in dystonia. We conclude that GPi DBS for PTD results in functional reorganization of the nervous system, which includes a long-term increase in brainstem inhibition.     

Gait disturbance and deep brain stimulation

Gait disturbance, one of the axial symptoms, is caused by various disorders, including basal ganglia disease. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has widened the spectrum of therapeutic options for patients with gait disturbance due to Parkinson disease and dystonia. In gait disturbance caused by basal ganglia disease, the main targets of DBS are the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus internus (GPi). STN DBS is more than GPi DBS effective for treating levodopa-responsive parkinsonian symptoms, including gait disturbance. GPi DBS is effective for the treatment of primary segmental or generalized dystonia. The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPN), which is involved in locomotion, is one of the new targets for treating gait disturbance in Parkinson disease. We review DBS in the treatment of gait disturbance due to Parkinson disease and dystonia.     

The Influence of Deep Brain Stimulation Intensity and Duration on Symptoms Evolution in an OFF Stimulation Dystonia Study

BackgroundDeep brain stimulation (DBS) of the internal globus pallidus (GPi) is an established therapy for primary generalized dystonia. However, the evolution of dystonia symptoms after DBS discontinuation after years of therapy has only rarely been reported. We therefore longitudinally studied the main physiological measurements known to be impaired in dystonia, with DBS ON and then again after termination of DBS, after at least five years of continuous DBS.ObjectiveWe studied whether dystonia evolution after DBS discontinuation in patients benefiting from long-term GPi DBS is different from that observed in earlier stages of the therapy.MethodsIn eleven DYT1 patients treated with bilateral GPi DBS for at least 5 years, dystonia was assessed ON-DBS, immediately after switch-off (OFF-DBS1) and 48 h after DBS termination (OFF-DBS2). We studied the influence of DBS intensity on dystonia when DBS was discontinued.ResultsOn average a significant difference in symptoms was measured only between ON-DBS and OFF-DBS1 conditions. Importantly, none of the patients returned to their preoperative dystonia severity, even 48 h after discontinuation. The amount of clinical deterioration in the OFF conditions positively correlated with higher stimulation current in the chronic ON-DBS condition.ConclusionsThe duration of DBS application influences symptom evolution after DBS termination. DBS intensity seems to have a prominent role on evolution of dystonic symptoms when DBS is discontinued. In conclusion, DBS induces changing modulation of the motor network with less worsening of symptoms after long term stimulation, when DBS is stopped.     

脑深部电刺激治疗肌张力障碍

目的 探讨脑深部电刺激术(deep brain stimulation, DBS)治疗全身性、偏身性和节段性肌张力障碍的有效性和安全性,肌张力障碍患者治疗和术后程控的策略.方法 采用微电极记录下丘脑底核(subthalamic nucleus, STN)、苍白球内侧部(globus pallidus intemus, GPi)和丘脑腹中间核(ventrointermediate nucleus, Vim)埋置脑深部刺激器治疗肌张力障碍患者15例,同时记录患者对侧受累肌肉的电活动.其中13例患者的刺激靶点为STN(11例为双侧,2例为单侧),1例刺激靶点为单侧GPi,1例为Vim.结果 除1例严重全身肌张力障碍患者外,其余患者因随访时间长短,均有不同程度改善,改善率从22.0%～95.8%不等.其中随访时间超过12个月的患者症状改善率均大于48.6%.1例因全身扭动造成电极外露,颈、胸腹部切口感染,最终将DBS装置取出.另有1例患者因双侧上端的两个触点断路,再次手术将电极位置上移.所有患者均未出现因穿刺造成的颅内出血的永久并发症.结论 通过对现有DBS治疗肌张力障碍病例资料有效性和安全性的总结,DBS成为治疗肌张力障碍的一种新方法.     

Pallidal and thalamic deep brain stimulation in myoclonus‐dystonia

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the internal globus pallidus (GPi) and ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus (VIM) are established treatment options in primary dystonia and tremor syndromes and have been reported anecdotally to be efficacious in myoclonus‐dystonia (MD). We investigated short‐ and long‐term effects on motor function, cognition, affective state, and quality of life (QoL) of GPi‐ and VIM‐DBS in MD. Ten MD‐patients (nine ε‐sarcoglycan‐mutation‐positive) were evaluated pre‐ and post‐surgically following continuous bilateral GPi‐ and VIM‐DBS at four time points: presurgical, 6, 12, and as a last follow‐up at a mean of 62.3 months postsurgically, and in OFF‐, GPi‐, VIM‐, and GPi‐VIM‐DBS conditions by validated motor [unified myoclonus rating scale (UMRS), TSUI Score, Burke‐Fahn‐Marsden dystonia rating scale (BFMDRS)], cognitive, affective, and QoL‐scores. MD‐symptoms significantly improved at 6 months post‐surgery (UMRS: 61.5%, TSUI Score: 36.5%, BFMDRS: 47.3%). Beneficial effects were sustained at long‐term evaluation post‐surgery (UMRS: 65.5%, TSUI Score: 35.1%, BFMDRS: 48.2%). QoL was significantly ameliorated; affective status and cognition remained unchanged postsurgically irrespective of the stimulation conditions. No serious long‐lasting stimulation‐related adverse events (AEs) were observed. Both GPi‐ and VIM‐DBS offer equally effective and safe treatment options for MD. With respect to fewer adverse, stimulation‐induced events of GPi‐DBS in comparison with VIM‐DBS, GPi‐DBS seems to be preferable. Combined GPi‐VIM‐DBS can be useful in cases of incapaciting myoclonus, refractory to GPi‐DBS alone. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society     

Globus pallidus deep brain stimulation for generalized dystonia: clinical and PET investigation.

Bilateral globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) in a patient with severe idiopathic generalized dystonia resulted in immediate improvement of all aspects of dystonia. During joystick movement, GPi DBS reduced PET activation bilaterally in the primary motor, lateral premotor, supplementary motor, anterior cingulate, and prefrontal areas and ipsilaterally in the lentiform nucleus. Altering basal ganglia function with GPi DBS reverses the overactivity of certain motor cortical areas present in dystonia.     

Pallidal stimulation in dystonia: effects on cognition, mood, and quality of life

Bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) alleviates symptoms in patients with dystonia but its effects on cognition, neuropsychiatric status, and quality of life have not been examined. This is a case series report of 15 consecutive patients with different forms of dystonia who underwent bilateral implantation of DBS electrodes in the GPi. The patients were evaluated preoperatively and after 3-12 months of DBS with tests of cognition (Mattis Dementia Rating Scale, Stroop Test, Trail Making Test, Phonemic and Category Word Fluency, Digit Span, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Tonic and Phasic Alertness), neuropsychiatric status (Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories, Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale, Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale), quality of life, and motor functions. GPi DBS significantly improved dystonic symptoms, functional abilities, and quality of life allowing for a significant reduction of antidystonic medications. No deterioration was observed in cognitive scores and neuropsychiatric measures. The present case series report thus provides preliminary evidence for the safety of GPi DBS regarding cognitive and neuropsychiatric functions in patients with dystonia.     

Surgical treatment of myoclonus dystonia syndrome

Myoclonus dystonia (M‐D) syndrome is a heritable movement disorder characterized by myoclonic jerks and dystonia primarily of the upper extremities. M‐D remains poorly responsive to pharmacological treatment. Emerging reports suggest good response to DBS of the internal globus pallidus (GPi) and ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) of the thalamus. This study aimed to appraise the value of these two DBS targets by evaluating reports available in the literature. A systematic search of published case reports and case series was performed on Medline and Embase. Responses to DBS were evaluated. Myoclonus was assessed with the Unified Myoclonus Rating Scale (UMRS) and dystonia by the Burke‐Fahn‐Marsden dystonia rating scale (BFMDRS). The primary outcome of interest was the relative improvements noted with GPi, compared to VIM stimulation. A total of 17 publications yielded 40 unique cases, with mean follow‐up of 27.2 months. All patients demonstrated improvements in myoclonus scores, with 93.5% showing at least a 50% improvement in UMRS. The mean improvement in myoclonus scores was 72.6%. In contrast, dystonia scores were improved in 87.9% of patients, with 72.7% reporting at least a 50% improvement in BFMDRS. The mean improvement in dystonia scores was 52.6%. Improvements in myoclonus scores were similar for both GPi (75.7%) and VIM (70.4%; P = 0.27). However, the improvements in dystonia scores were greater with GPi (60.2%), compared to VIM (33.3%; P = 0.03). Although both targets achieve similar improvements in myoclonus, GPi stimulation may be a preferred target because it may achieve greater improvements in dystonia, compared to VIM stimulation. © 2013 Movement Disorder Society     

Surgical targets for dystonic tremor: Considerations between the globus pallidus and ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus

Dystonic tremor (DT) is characterized by coexisting tremor and abnormal dystonic posturing in the same segment. DT is often medically refractory and DBS is an important therapeutic option. However, the optimal surgical target for DT remains uncertain with Vim, GPi and zona incerta previously reported as effective. We retrospectively reviewed the outcome data from all patients with DT involving at least one upper extremity who underwent DBS at Vanderbilt University from July 2006 to July 2010. We evaluated the improvement of tremor and dystonia after their response to DBS was judged to be maximal. Ten patients met the inclusion criteria. Vim was targeted in four patients and three had unilateral procedure and one bilateral Vim DBS. GPi was targeted in four patients with bilateral DBS procedure in every patient from this subgroup. A combined bilateral GPi and unilateral Vim DBS was performed in two patients. The best results for tremor control were observed in patients with Vim DBS but they had persisting mild dystonia. Patients with GPi DBS had average DT improvement by approximately 50% but their dystonia symptoms were markedly improved. We propose that the patients with DT with a mild dystonia should be considered for Vim DBS procedure and the coexistence of severe DT and dystonia may be successfully controlled by combined GPi and Vim DBS surgeries.     

Deep brain stimulation for generalised dystonia and spasmodic torticollis.

Dystonia appears distinct from the other tremulous disorders in that improvement following deep brain stimulation frequently appears in a delayed and progressive manner. The rate of this improvement and the point at which no further progress can be expected are presently unknown. The establishment of these parameters is important in the provision of accurate and relevant prognostic information to these patients, their carers, and their treating physicians. We studied 12 consecutive patients with generalised dystonia (n=6) and spasmodic torticollis (n=6) who underwent bilateral globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) and were followed up for a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Standard rating scales were used to quantify their neurological improvement. Both groups experienced a statistically significant improvement in their rating scores at both one and two years following surgery. At 2 years follow-up, the spasmodic torticollis group exhibited a 59% improvement in their total Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticoilis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) rating score and the generalised dystonia group attained a 46% improvement in their overall Burke, Fahn and Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) evaluation. Ninety-five percent of the final improvement was attained by 6.4 months in the generalised dystonia group and by 6.6 months in those with spasmodic torticollis. There was no significant improvement after one year postoperatively. These findings add further support to GPi DBS as an effective treatment for generalised dystonia and spasmodic torticollis, and furnish important information as to the expected rate of improvement and the point at which no further gains can be reasonably anticipated.     

Pallidal surgery for the treatment of primary generalized dystonia: long-term follow-up

OBJECTIVE: To describe the results and long-term follow-up after functional surgery of the internal segment of the globus pallidus (GPi) in 10 patients with primary generalized dystonia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine of the 10 patients were positive for the DYT1 gene mutation. Bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the GPi was performed in three cases, bilateral pallidotomy in two, and combined surgery (unilateral GPi lesion with contralateral stimulation) in the remaining five. All patients were evaluated with the Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia scale (BFMDS) before, immediately after surgery, at 3 weeks, 3 and 6 months and then yearly. Follow up time ranged from 15 to 105 months (mean: 66.1 months) with six patients having more than 6 years follow up. RESULTS: All patients improved after surgery. All patients with unilateral or bilateral DBS experienced an immediate improvement before starting stimulation. The magnitude of this initial micro lesion effect did not predict the magnitude of the long-term benefit of DBS. The mean decrease in the in the BFMDS was 34%, 55%, and 65% in the movement scale; and 32%, 48%, and 49% in the disability scale for patients with bilateral pallidal DBS, combined unilateral DBS and contralateral pallidotomy, and bilateral pallidotomy, respectively. Worsening of dystonia after a plateau of sustained benefit was observed in three patients. Two patients required multiple pallidal surgeries. Adverse events included: permanent anarthria (1), misplacement of the electrode requiring further surgery (2), scalp infection (1), and hardware related problems (3). CONCLUSIONS: This long-term follow up study confirms the beneficial effect of pallidal DBS or pallidotomy in primary generalized dystonia. In addition, our results extent previous observations by showing that, in these patients, (1) the microlesion effect of DBS is not predictive of long-term benefit; (2) combined DBS with contralateral pallidotomy appears to be more effective than bilateral pallidal DBS; and (3) dystonia can reappear after an initial good response during long term follow up.     

Deep brain stimulation for torsion dystonia in children

Introduction Deep brain stimulation (DBS) at the internal globus pallidus (GPi) is an effective treatment for some patients with medically refractory torsion dystonia. In this article, we review the results of pallidal DBS surgery in children with dystonia. Details of the DBS procedure and programming of the DBS devices are discussed. Discussion Pallidal DBS is most effective in patients with primary generalized dystonia. Children and adolescents possessing the DYT1 gene mutation may respond best of all. The presence of static dystonic postures and/or fixed orthopedic contractures may limit the functional response to DBS and may require additional surgery. Conclusion As a group, patients with secondary dystonias respond less well to DBS than patients with primary dystonia. However, patients with dystonia secondary to anoxic brain injury who have grossly intact basal ganglia anatomy may represent a subpopulation for whom pallidal DBS is a viable option.     

Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus internus in tardive dystonia

Tardive dystonia is a disabling movement disorder as a consequence of exposure to neuroleptic drugs. We followed 6 patients with medically refractory tardive dystonia treated by bilateral globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) for 21 ± 18 months. At last follow‐up, the Burke‐Fahn‐Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) motor score improved by 86% ± 14%, and the BFMDRS disability score improved by 80% ± 12%. Bilateral GPi‐DBS is a beneficial therapeutic option for the long‐term relief of tardive dystonia. © 2008 Movement Disorder Society