Quadriceps and patellar tendon ruptures

Ruptures of the quadriceps as well as the patellar tendon occur in low frequency, but cause major functional deficits of the leg. These injuries usually require operative treatment. Acute quadriceps tendon ruptures are treated by suture repair, using heavy sutures guided through bone tunnels in the patella. Chronic defects and neglected cases require a local tendon transfer, either by a quadriceps tendon turn-down or by a V-Y-plasty of the quadriceps tendon. Ruptures of the patellar tendon are treated by suture of the tendon stumps plus an reinforcement procedure protecting the tendon and avoiding secondary patella alta. Patello-tibial fixation may be achieved by a cerclage technique using wire or an autologous tendon strip, alternatively a patello-tibial external fixator can be applied. In chronic and neglected cases, patellar tendon reconstruction is performed with autologous tendon grafts or with soft tissue allografts. The graft must be protected by a patello-tibial fixation for the first weeks.     

Editorial Commentary: Suture Type or Technique Has Little Influence on Outcome After Acute Lower-Extremity Tendon Rupture

Operative repair of Achilles tendon rupture significantly decreases the rerupture rate, regardless of type of surgical suture technique. Likewise, regarding repair of either the quadriceps or patellar tendon, surgical repair technique does not significantly influence the generally excellent outcomes achieved, whereas too-early mobilization should be avoided. In terms of the use of suture versus suture tape, load to failure is similar. Many factors impact tendon rupture repair success, including postoperative care, the quality of the tendon, underlying medical issues, and patient compliance, but suture type or technique has little influence on outcome after acute lower-extremity tendon rupture.     

Eine vereinfachte Methode zur Therapie der Quadrizepssehnenruptur mittels transpatellarer PDS-Kordel

Quadriceps tendon ruptures are relatively unusual injuries caused by direct or more frequently indirect trauma. Since complete ruptures lead to loss of active extension of the knee joint, operative treatment is usually indicated. Several techniques are described in the literature. However, relatively little is known about the functional outcome after operative treatment of acute quadriceps tendon ruptures. We present a new operative technique using a 1.3-mm PDS cord passed through a transverse drill hole in the proximal pole of the patella. We operated ten consecutive cases of complete quadriceps tendon ruptures with the technique described between January 2000 and June 2003. Eight of ten patients were evaluated after a mean follow-up time of 38 months by physical examination, IKDC Subjective score, Lysholm and Tegner score as well as an isokinetic test of the quadriceps strength. No complications were noted in this period. The average postoperative scores were 87 (IKDC), 98 (Lysholm), and 4.5 (Tegner). Isokinetic testing showed an average of 25% quadriceps strength deficit. The operative treatment of complete quadriceps tendon ruptures using a PDS cord through a drill hole in the patella is a safe and effective technique permitting functional postoperative treatment.     

Die primäre Naht der Fingerbeugesehnen

OBJECTIVE: Flexor tendon repair by direct suture, providing tendon function and mechanical properties and allowing postoperative active extension and flexion. INDICATIONS: Flexor tendon laceration in all zones, when primary healing and a good functional outcome can be expected. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Florid and chronic infection. Lack of skill, instruments, or manpower. Tension-free suture is not feasible. Severe soft-tissue problems. Mantero suture in case of coexistent artery injury. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Hand surgical incisions and approach to the tendon. Opening of the tendon sheath in the region of oblique pulley. A four-strand core suture consisting of two locked two-strand sutures and a circumferential epitendon cross-stitch suture are performed. Lacerations in zone I with a tendon stump shorter than 1 cm require a Mantero suture and avulsions require a pull-out suture technique. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Active flexion and active extension in a dorsal wrist cast. RESULTS: The clinical outcome studies after repair of zone II flexor tendon injuries using a multiple-strand suture technique describe 69-96% excellent and good results.     

Treatment of Extensor Tendon Disruption After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

BackgroundPatellar or quadriceps tendon ruptures after total knee arthroplasty constitute a devastating complication with historically poor outcomes. With advances in soft tissue reconstruction and repair techniques, treatment has become more nuanced. Numerous graft options for reconstruction and suture techniques for repair have been described but there is no consensus regarding optimal treatment.MethodsA search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus was conducted. Articles meeting inclusion criteria were reviewed. Type of intervention performed, type of injury studied, outcome measures, and complications were recorded. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed.ResultsTwenty-eight articles met inclusion criteria. The complication rate after repair of patellar tendon (63.16%) was higher than the complication rate after repair of quadriceps tendon (25.37%). However, the complication rate for patellar and quadriceps tendon tears after autograft, allograft, or mesh reconstruction was similar (18.8% vs 19.2%, respectively). The most common complication after extensor mechanism repair or reconstruction was extension lag of 30° or greater (45.33%). This was followed by re-rupture and infection (25.33% and 22.67%, respectively). Early ruptures had a higher overall complication rate than late injuries.ConclusionExtensor mechanism disruption after total knee arthroplasty is a complication with high morbidity. Reconstruction of patellar tendon rupture has a much lower complication rate than repair. Our findings support the recommendation of patellar tendon reconstruction in both the early and late presentation stages. Quadriceps rupture can be treated with repair in early ruptures or with reconstruction in the late rupture or in the case of revision surgery.     

Transossäre Naht der Patellarsehnenruptur

OBJECTIVE: Restoration of active knee extension. Restoration of active knee stabilization. Avoiding secondary patella alta. INDICATIONS: Acute rupture of the patellar tendon within 3-5 days. Chronic rupture of the patellar tendon. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Compromised general health status or associated injuries. Compromised local soft-tissue situation. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Exposure of the ruptured tendon. Coronal drill hole through the distal third of the patella and coronal drill hole through the tibial tuberosity. After anatomic positioning of the patella (adjusting correct height), patellotibial fixation with monofil or woven (Labitzke) cerclage wire or PDS cord. Suture repair of the patellar tendon and repair of the ruptured medial and lateral retinaculum. Drain insertion. Wound closure in layers. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Full load bearing in cylinder cast. Week 0-2: flexion restricted to 30 degrees , quadriceps muscle isometry. Week 2-4: flexion restricted to 60 degrees , strengthening of hip abductors and extensors. Week 4-6: flexion restricted to 90 degrees . After week 6: removal of cylinder cast. After week 12: return to sporting activities, removal of the cerclage wire. RESULTS: Good results after surgical therapy. Low rate of secondary rupture. Low rate of muscle weakness.     

Rupture of the patellar tendon: a review of 68 cases and a retrospective study of 29 ruptures comparing two methods of augmentation

Rupture of the patellar tendon is a rare injury requiring acute repair to reestablish knee extensor continuity and to allow early motion. Different pathomechanisms have been postulated, and multiple techniques for repair have been described in the literature. Firstly, the current study reviews the epidemiology, pathomechanism, and risk factors. Secondly, we compare the outcome of two augmentation techniques after end-to-end sutures: reinforcement with either a wire cerclage or a PDS cord. In the first part of the study, the medical records of 66 patients with 68 ruptures were reviewed. For the second part, 33 patients were included who had no prior injury to the extensor mechanism of the knee and had suffered an indirect, low-velocity injury followed by immediate repair. Twenty-seven patients with 29 ruptures of the patellar tendon returned for follow-up. Follow-up averaged 8.1 years (range 1-16 years). In the follow-up group, 22 ruptures had augmentation with a wire cerclage (group A), and 7 ruptures had augmentation with a 2-mm PDS cord (group B). Follow-up evaluation consisted of a subjective questionnaire, a physical and radiographic examination, the Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score, and the Insall-Salvati ratio. Nineteen patients underwent Cybex isokinetic strength testing of the quadriceps. Indirect, low-velocity injuries occurred most often in the 30–40 year age group, whereas complex knee traumas or knee luxations were more evenly distributed. In 10 of 46 patients with an indirect, low-velocity injury, there was a history of prior injury and illness to the extensor mechanism of the knee, compared with 1 of 22 patients with a high-velocity complex knee trauma. In the follow-up group, no patient sustained a rerupture. Two of 22 patients had an extension lag in group A compared with no extension lag in group B. Average flexion in group A was 130° (SD 29°) compared with 137° (SD 12°) in group B. The average Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score was 92 (SD 17) in group A and 96 (SD 12) in group B. Three patients were dissatisfied. All had radiographic signs of retropatellar osteoarthritis. In contrast, 9 of 26 patients who were satisfied with their result had radiographic signs of retropatellar osteoarthritis. A postoperative difference in the Insall-Salvati ratio did not correlate with the development of osteoarthritis. Both augmentation techniques are reliable and demostrate good intermediate to long-term results. The outcome did not show significant differences. To avoid reoperation for removal of the cerclage wire, a PDS cord can be used. The infection rate seems to be higher in the PDS group. A larger prospective study group is necessary to determine whether this phenomenon can be reproduced. Received: 17 January 2001     

Editorial Commentary: Quadriceps Tendon Suture Anchor Repair Provides Better Patient-Reported Outcomes Than Transosseous Tunnel Repair: Defining the New Gold Standard

Quadriceps tendon suture anchor repair provides biomechanically greater and more consistent failure loads than transosseous tunnel repair, including less cyclic displacement (gap formation). Although satisfactory clinical outcomes are found with both repair techniques, few studies provide a side-to-side comparison. However, recent research demonstrates better clinical outcomes in using suture anchors, with equal failure rates. Suture anchor repair is minimally invasive requiring smaller incisions, less patellar dissection, and eliminates patellar tunnel drilling that can breach the anterior cortex, create stress risers, result in osteolysis from nonabsorbable intraosseous sutures and longitudinal patellar fractures. Suture anchor quadriceps tendon repair should now be considered the gold standard.     

Lokale Infektionen nach Ersatz des vorderen Kreuzbandes

Two rare cases of local infections after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with Polydioxanon (PDS) cord and patellar/quadriceps tendon including patellar periosteum are presented.     

Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft

BACKGROUND: Surgical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is indicated in the ACL-deficient knee with symptomatic instability and multiple ligaments injuries. Bone patellar tendon-bone and the hamstring tendon generally have been used. In the present study, we describe an alternative graft, the quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft, by using arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. METHODS: From March of 1996 through March of 1997, a quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft was used in 12 patients with ACL injuries. RESULTS: After 15 to 24 months of follow-up, the clinical outcome for those patients with this graft have been encouraging. Ten patients could return to the same or a higher level of preinjury sports activity. According to the International Knee Documentation Committee rating system, 10 of the 12 patients had normal or nearly normal ratings. Recovery of quadriceps muscle strength to 80% of the normal knee was achieved in 11 patients in 1 year. CONCLUSION: The advantages of the quadriceps tendon graft include the following: the graft is larger and stronger than the patellar tendon; morbidity of harvest technique and donor site is less than that of patellar tendon graft; there is little quadriceps inhibition after quadriceps harvest; there is quicker return to sports activities with aggressive rehabilitation. A quadriceps tendon-patellar autograft is a reasonable alternative to ACL reconstruction in patients who are not suitable for either a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft or a hamstring tendon autograft.     

Repair of Quadriceps and Patellar Tendon Tears

Tears of the quadriceps or patellar tendon usually occur after a sudden eabccentric contraction and are diagnosed by a palpable gap at the injury site combined with an inability to perform a straight leg raise. Bilateral knee radiographs may demonstrate patella alta with patellar tendon tears and patella baja with quadriceps tendon tears compared with the uninjured knee. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging can be helpful when there is uncertainty in the diagnosis. Surgical treatment is indicated for complete tears and some high-grade, partial tears. Nonabsorbable high-strength sutures or suture tape are placed in running locking fashion along the injured tendon and secured to the patella with bone tunnels (i.e., transosseous) or suture anchors. The transosseous technique requires exposure of the length of the patella to drill 3 bone tunnels to shuttle the sutures and tie over either pole of the patella. The suture anchor technique allows for a smaller incision and less soft-tissue dissection and may use a knotted or knotless technique. Biomechanical testing with load to failure is not statistically different between the transosseous and anchor techniques, although anchors have been shown to have less gap formation at the repair site. Repair augmentation with a graft may be beneficial in mid-substance injuries, chronic tears, and in cases of compromised tissue quality. Rehabilitation usually can be initiated immediately with protected weight-bearing in an orthosis, safe-zone knee passive range of motion, and avoidance of active extension. After a period of 6 weeks, rehabilitation can progress with full range of motion and a concentric strengthening program.     

A method of repair for quadriceps tendon or patellar ligament (tendon) ruptures without cast immobilization. Preliminary report

The quadriceps tendon and patellar tendon (ligament) were repaired with a Dacron vascular graft used as a tension suture material. In cases of quadriceps tendon ruptures, the Dacron graft is passed transversely through the patellar ligament just below the patella and crossed transversely at the level of the musculotendinous junction with two loops applying tension to the tendon, which brings the tendon ends together by creating a solid structure. In cases of patellar ligament ruptures, the Dacron graft is passed through a hole in the tibia posteriorly to the tibial tuberosity instead of through the patellar ligament below the patella. This technique enables early mobilization on the first day after surgery. The technique was first tested on six dogs with severed quadriceps tendons and patellar ligaments that were repaired with this suture method. All of the animals recovered from surgery and walked and ran normally on the repaired legs within 27 days and with only mild limping after 17 days. The technique was then used on six patients, four with complete quadriceps tendon rupture and two with complete tear (avulsion) of the patellar ligament (tendon). In all of the patients, excellent surgical results were obtained and leg immobilization was virtually eliminated. Physical therapy was prescribed the first day after surgery. The rehabilitation period was significantly reduced.     

Surgical treatment of common peroneal nerve injuries: indications and results. A series of 62 cases

AIM: Common peroneal nerve (CPN) injuries represent the most common nerve lesions of the lower limb and can be due to several causative mechanisms. Although in most cases they recover spontaneously, an irreversible damage of the nerve is also likely to occur. Nerve regeneration following CPN repair is poorer if compared to other peripheral nerves and this can explain the reluctant attitude of many physicians towards the surgical treatment of these patients. Among the several factors advocated to explain the poor outcome following surgery, it has been suggested that reinnervation might be obstacled by the force imbalance between the functioning flexors and the paralysed extensors that eventually results in the fixed equinism of the foot, due to the excessive contracture of the active muscles and the shortening of the heel cord. Therefore the early correction of these forces might favour nerve regeneration. Following such hypothesis, the authors treat irreversible CPN injuries performing a one-stage procedure of nerve repair and tibialis tendon transfer. We report our experience, describing the indications to surgical treatment, the operative technique and the postoperative clinical outcome correlated with the causative mechanisms of the injuries. METHODS: A 62-patient series controlled over a period of 15 years with a post-traumatic palsy of the CPN is reported. All the patients underwent surgery. In open wounds, when a nerve transection was suspected, surgery was performed at emergency (2 cases). In closed injuries, operative treatment was advised when no spontaneous regeneration occurred 3-4 months after the injury. From 1988 till 1991, 9 patients were elected for surgery : in 6 cases treatment consisted of neuroma resection and nerve repair by means of a graft. In 3 patients it was performed only a CPN decompression at the fibular neck. Since 1991, surgical treatment has always consisted of nerve repair associated with a tendon transfer during the same procedure. Fifty-three patients were elected for surgery. Nerve repair was achieved by direct suture in 1 case and by means of a graft in 46 patients. Decompression of the CPN at the fibular neck was performed in 6 patients where nerve continuity was demonstrated. RESULTS: In the first group of patients, nerve repair outcome was highly disapponting: no recovery in 5 cases, reinnervation occurred in 1 patient only (M1-2). CPN decompression was followed by complete recovery in 2 cases, no improvement was observed in 1 case. Nerve repair associated with tibialis tendon transfer dramatically improved the postoperative outcome: at 2 year follow-up, neural regeneration was demonstrated in 90% of the patients. Surgical outcome depends on the causative mechanisms of the lesion: sharp injuries and severe dislocations of the knee had an excellent recovery, while in crush injuries and gunshot wounds good recovery was less common. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment of CPN injuries can nowadays be highly rewarding. CPN palsies in open wounds should undergo surgical exploration at emergency. In close injuries with no spontaneous recovery within 4 months after the injury, patients should be advised to seek surgical treatment regardless the causative mechanism of the lesion. According to our experience, the association of a transfer procedure to nerve repair enhances neural regeneration, dramatically improving the surgical outcome of these injuries.     

Complications in Brief: Quadriceps and Patellar Tendon Tears

Effective treatment of knee extensor mechanism disruptions requires prompt diagnosis and thoughtful decision-making with surgical and nonsurgical approaches. When surgery is chosen, excellent surgical technique can result in excellent outcomes. Complications and failures arise from missed or delayed diagnoses and from technical problems in the operating room. In particular, inappropriate surgical timing (especially late surgery), misplaced patellar drill holes, and failure to address concomitant injuries can result in complications seen when repairing a patellar or quadriceps tendon tear. We review the complications that can occur during treatment of these injuries (Table 1).

Vordere Kreuzbandruptur bei offenen Wachstumsfugen

The treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in skeletally immature patients with open growth plates is in an state of flux. In contrast to earlier, when conservative treatment was advised, it is now almost universally agreed that surgical repair is best, since the high level of physical activity in most children and adolescents can lead to secondary damage to menisci and cartilage. When bony avulsion is also present fixation with wires or screws generally gives good or excellent results with no functional loss, while sutures almost always fail to retain the ruptured ligamentous fibers. Reasonable short- and mid-term results have been observed following transepiphyseal ligament replacement with hamstring tendon strands anchored extracortically. When patellar ligament grafts are used, femoral fixation must be carried out cranial to and through the condyle and in an over-the-top fashion, so as to prevent early growth plate closure. Concomitant injuries, and especially meniscal tears, frequently lead to a poor outcome if left untreated, and adequate operative management is therefore essential. In the postoperative period sustained physiotherapy is indispensable to ensure a good result of reconstructive surgery and hasten rehabilitation, and also to optimize the functional outcome.     

Tendon injuries of the hand

Tendon injuries are the second most common injuries of the hand and therefore an important topic in trauma and orthopedic patients. Most injuries are open injuries to the flexor or extensor tendons, but less frequent injuries, e.g., damage to the functional system tendon sheath and pulley or dull avulsions, also need to be considered. After clinical examination, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging have proved to be important diagnostic tools. Tendon injuries mostly require surgical repair, dull avulsions of the distal phalanges extensor tendon can receive conservative therapy. Injuries of the flexor tendon sheath or single pulley injuries are treated conservatively and multiple pulley injuries receive surgical repair. In the postoperative course of flexor tendon injuries, the principle of early passive movement is important to trigger an "intrinsic" tendon healing to guarantee a good outcome. Many substances were evaluated to see if they improved tendon healing; however, little evidence was found. Nevertheless, hyaluronic acid may improve intrinsic tendon healing.     

The use of suture anchors to repair the ruptured quadriceps tendon

Quadriceps tendon rupture is an incapacitating injury that usually requires surgical repair. Traditional repair methods involve transpatellar suture tunnels, but recent reports have introduced the idea of using suture anchors to repair the ruptured tendon. We present 5 cases of our technique of using suture anchors to repair the ruptured quadriceps tendon.     

Comparison of pullout button versus suture anchor for zone I flexor tendon repair

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcome after repair of zone I flexor tendon injuries using either the pullout button technique or suture anchors placed in the distal phalanx. METHODS: Between 1998 and 2002 we treated 26 consecutive zone I flexor tendon injuries. Thirteen patients had repairs from 1998 to 2000 using a modified pullout button technique (group A) and 13 patients had repair using suture anchors placed in the distal phalanx (group B). Patient characteristics were similar for both groups. The same postoperative flexor tendon rehabilitation protocol and follow-up schedule were used for both groups. Evaluation included range of motion, sensibility and grip strength, failure, complications, and return to work. The Student t test was used to determine significant differences. RESULTS: All patients completed 1 year of follow-up evaluation. There were 2 infections in group A that resolved with oral antibiotics and no infections in group B. There were no tendon repair failures and no repeat surgeries in either group. At final follow-up evaluation there were no statistically significant differences for the following end points: sensibility (Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing and 2-point discrimination), active range of motion (at the proximal interphalangeal joint, distal interphalangeal joint, or their combined motion), flexion contracture (at the proximal interphalangeal joint, distal interphalangeal joint, or their combined contracture), and grip strength (injured tendon as a percent of the contralateral uninjured tendon). The suture anchor group had a statistically significant improvement for time to return to work. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the clinical outcome after flexor tendon repair using either suture anchors or the pullout button technique. A significant improvement was found for time to return to work for repairs using the suture anchor technique. Flexor tendon repair can be achieved using suture anchors placed in the distal phalanx, thereby avoiding the potential morbidity associated with the pullout button technique. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level III.     

Principles of tendon repair

Tendon injuries in the hand are common; they are usually open injuries requiring surgical intervention. In this article we discuss tendon injuries in terms of approach to repair beginning at the time of diagnosis through to the rehabilitation programmes and outcome measures commonly used in the UK. In general tendon injuries should be considered using Verdan's zones for both extensor and flexor injuries. Flexor tendons require a high strength repair and usually warrant a core suture with epitendinous reinforcement bearing in mind the importance of not disrupting glide with unnecessary suture bulk. Extensor tendons more proximally can be treated in the same way but distally require only a running suture in the flattened tendon ends. All tendon injuries require a period of protected mobilization with splinting aiming to protect the repair but reduce stiffness in other joints.     

Transosseous tunnels versus suture anchors for the repair of acute quadriceps and patellar tendon ruptures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of biomechanical studies

BackgroundMultiple techniques have been developed for the repair of acute quadriceps and patellar tendon ruptures with the goal of optimizing clinical outcomes while minimizing complications and costs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical properties of transosseous tunnels and suture anchors for the repair of quadriceps and patellar tendon ruptures.MethodsA systematic review of the PubMed and Embase databases was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using specific search terms and eligibility criteria. Meta-analysis was performed by fixed-effects models for studies of low heterogeneity (I² <25%) and random-effects models for studies of moderate to high heterogeneity (I² ≥25%).ResultsA total of 392 studies were identified from the initial literature search with 7 studies meeting the eligibility criteria for quadriceps tendon repair and 8 studies meeting the eligibility criteria for patellar tendon repair. Based on the random-effects model for total gap formation and load to failure for quadriceps tendon repair, the mean difference was 8.88 mm (95% CI, −8.31 mm to 26.06 mm; p = 0.31) in favor of a larger gap with transosseous tunnels and −117.25N (95%CI, −242.73N to 8.23N; p = 0.07) in favor of a larger load to failure with suture anchors. A similar analysis for patellar tendon repair demonstrated a mean difference of 2.86 mm (95% CI, 1.08 mm to 4.64 mm; p = 0.002) in favor of a larger gap with transosseous tunnels and −56.34N (95% CI, −226.75 to 114.07N; p = 0.52) in favor of a larger load to failure with suture anchor repair.ConclusionsTransosseous tunnels are biomechanically similar to suture anchors for quadriceps tendon repair. Patellar tendon repair may benefit from reduced gap formation after cycling with suture anchor repair, but the load to failure for both techniques is biomechanically similar. Additional studies are necessary to evaluate these and alternative repair techniques.Level of evidenceSystematic review and meta-analysis of biomechanical studies, Level V.