High-dose therapy autotransplantation/intensification vs continued standard chemotherapy in multiple myeloma in first remission. Results of a non-randomized study from a single institution

The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcome of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) responding to initial chemotherapy who received intensification with high-dose therapy/autotransplantation (HDT) as compared to that of those who were continued on standard chemotherapy. From 1 January 1990 to 30 June 1998, 64 patients with MM who were younger than 65 years achieved a response to initial chemotherapy. Due to referral reasons, patients preference or inclusion in trials, 31 patients received HDT as early intensification while 33 were continued on standard chemotherapy. The presenting features were similar in both groups, except for the median age, which was lower in the HDT group (53 vs 58 years, P = 0.007). Complete response negative immunofixation - (CR) was achieved in 12 of 31 (39%) patients intensified with HDT and in two of 33 (6%) patients who were continued on conventional chemotherapy (P = 0.002). Event-free survival (EFS) was significantly longer in the HDT group (median, 43 vs 21 months; P = 0.007). Overall survival (OS) was not significantly different between groups (median, 62 vs 38 months; P = 0.21). However, patients in the HDT group who achieved CR had an EFS (median, 51 vs 31 months; P = 0.03) as well as an OS (median, not reached vs 50 months; P = 0.0006) significantly longer than those achieving a lower degree of response. In conclusion, this non-randomized study shows that early HDT increases CR rate and prolongs EFS. In addition, these results highlight CR as a crucial step for achieving long-lasting disease control and prolonged survival in patients with MM.     

High-dose therapy/autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with chemosensitive multiple myeloma: predictors of complete remission

High-dose therapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem cell support is widely used as intensification treatment in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) responsive to the initial chemotherapy. However, there is growing evidence that only the subset of patients who achieve complete remission (CR) actually benefit from this approach. The aim of this study was to identify pretransplant predictors of CR in responding myeloma patients intensified with HDT. A total of 59 patients with chemosensitive disease received myeloablative therapy. The intensification regimen consisted of MEL-200 (23), MEL-140/TBI 12 Gy (21) or busulfan-based regimens (15). Serum and urine negative immunofixation were required for CR. After HDT, the CR rate increased from 8 to 37%. For the overall series, the median event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) from the initiation of therapy were 41 and 68 months, respectively. Patients who achieved CR had an EFS (median 47 vs 36 months; P=0.023) as well as an OS (median not reached vs 60 months; P=0.006) significantly longer than those attaining a lower degree of response. Finally, the pretransplant features significantly associated to CR were a low M-protein size (serum 相似文献   

High-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in first complete or partial remission

Improved survival has been observed in poor-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients treated with high-dose therapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in first complete remission. Retrospective studies have suggested that HDT with ASCT can improve survival also in partial responders but some doubts about the advantage of intensive therapy in such patients still remain. We evaluated retrospectively the results of HDT and ASCT in 55 patients with confirmed DLBCL treated between May 1999 and July 2006. Thirty-six patients (65%) showed partial remission (PR) and 19 patients (35%) reached complete remission (CR) after induction treatment with (44%) or without (56%) concomitant rituximab (R) immunotherapy. After HDT and ASCT, 69% of patients fulfilled the criteria of CR, 22% had unconfirmed CR (CRu), 7% remained in PR and 1 patient (2%) relapsed. Twenty patients in PR after the induction treatment reached CR after ASCT, 12 other PR patients achieved CRu. The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) of the 55 transplanted patients was 76% (95% confidence interval /CI/, 63% to 89%) and the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 85% (95% CI, 73% to 97%). The EFS and OS rates differed significantly only between patients younger than 40 years and older groups (p=0.022 and p=0.046, respectively). On univariate analysis of prognostic factors, EFS and OS were not affected by any of the following: age, sex, stage, subtype of DLBCL, initial lactate dehydrogenase, beta-2-microglobulin and serum thymidine kinase levels, International Prognostic Index (IPI) and age-adjusted IPI scores, induction treatment with or without rituximab and type of primary therapeutic response (CR vs PR). These results show that first-line HDT and ASCT for adults up to the age of 65 years with poor-risk DLBCL is a feasible and effective treatment option even in the era of R-chemotherapy in CR as well as for patients in PR.     

Role of high-dose therapy and initial response in survival of poor-risk patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a retrospective series on 126 patients from a single center

It is now established that a subgroup of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients probably benefit from high-dose therapy (HDT). We therefore retrospectively analyzed survival of 126 consecutive patients with large cell lymphoma (LCL) and high-intermediate (HI) or high-risk (H) age-adjusted international prognostic index (Aa-IPI). They received either standard chemotherapy (CT) (66 patients), or HDT (60 patients). Distribution of the Aa-IPI scores showed no statistical significant difference between the two treatment groups. Complete response (CR) rate was 51% for the whole series, with 41% and 62% for the standard CT group and HDT group, respectively. With a median follow-up of 63 months (range, 16 to 159), the 5-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) for all patients was 52% and 43%, respectively. There was a statistical significant difference in terms of survival towards the HDT group: OS at 76% vs 31%, EFS at 64% vs 24%. Patients who achieved CR with front-line therapy had a 5-year OS at 70%, while it was 34% for patients who were not in CR. These results are comparable to those reported in the literature, and strongly suggest that both initial CR achievement and HDT as front-line treatment are predictive factors for prolonged survival of patients with poor-risk LCL. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 25, 35-40.     

An analysis of which subgroups of multiple myeloma patients, divided according to b(2)-microglobulin and plasma cell labeling index, benefit from high dose vs conventional chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The clinical advantage of high-dose therapy (HDT) over standard treatment for multiple myeloma (MM) patients has been recently assessed. Which patient subgroups benefit most from this approach is unclear. DESIGN AND METHODS: To address this issue, the outcome of 54 patients under 55 years old treated with HDT was compared with that of 101 age-matched controls selected from 390 patients who received standard melphalan and prednisone (MP) chemotherapy in a national multi-center trial (M90 protocol). RESULTS: The complete response (CR) rate was 50% in the HDT group compared to 5% in the MP group. Event-free survival (EFS) was three times longer for the HDT patients (median 34.5 vs 12.2 months, p<0. 0001), though the controls enjoyed a prolonged survival after relapse, and hence there was no statistically significant difference in OS. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed in relation to to two major prognostic factors: b(2)-microglobulin (b(2)-M) and bone marrow plasma cell labeling index (LI). HDT significantly improved OS in poor prognosis patients with a high LI (>1.2%), (median 49.5 vs 32.5 months, p<0.03), whereas it did not prolong OS in poor prognosis patients with high b(2 )-M (> 3 mg/L). INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, HDT has a major impact on CR and EFS, and is the treatment of choice for patients with a high LI. Alternative strategies should be adopted in poor prognosis patients with high b(2 )-M.     

High serum-free light chain levels and their rapid reduction in response to therapy define an aggressive multiple myeloma subtype with poor prognosis

Serum-free light chain (SFLC) levels are useful for diagnosing nonsecretory myeloma and monitoring response in light-chain-only disease, especially in the presence of renal failure. As part of a tandem autotransplantation trial for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, SFLC levels were measured at baseline, within 7 days of starting the first cycle, and before both the second induction cycle and the first transplantation. SFLC baseline levels higher than 75 mg/dL (top tertile) identified 33% of 301 patients with higher near-complete response rate (n-CR) to induction therapy (37% vs 20%, P = .002) yet inferior 24-month overall survival (OS: 76% vs 91%, P < .001) and event-free survival (EFS: 73% vs 90%, P < .001), retaining independent prognostic significance for both EFS (HR = 2.40, P = .008) and OS (HR = 2.43, P = .016). Baseline SFLC higher than 75 mg/dL was associated with light-chain-only secretion (P < .001), creatinine level 176.8 microM (2 mg/dL) or higher (P < .001), beta-2-microglobulin 297.5 nM/L (3.5 mg/L) or higher (P < .001), lactate dehydrogenase 190 U/L or higher (P < .001), and bone marrow plasmacytosis higher than 30% (P = .003). Additional independent adverse implications were conferred by top-tertile SFLC reductions before cycle 2 (OS: HR = 2.97, P = .003; EFS: HR = 2.56, P = .003) and before transplantation (OS: HR = 3.31, P = .001; EFS: HR = 2.65, P = .003). Unlike baseline and follow-up analyses of serum and urine M-proteins, high SFLC levels at baseline-reflecting more aggressive disease-and steeper reductions after therapy identified patients with inferior survival.     

High-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with peripheral T cell lymphomas

Peripheral T cell lymphomas (PTCL) have a poorer prognosis after conventional treatment than do high-grade B cell lymphomas. The place for high-dose therapy (HDT) with autologous stem cell support in these patients is still not clear. Forty patients, 10 women and 30 men, median age 41.5 years (range 16-61) with PTCL were treated with HDT and autologous stem cell support at The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway and The University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden, between February 1990 and September 1999. The histologic subtypes were: PTCL unspecified, 20 patients; intestinal, two patients; angioimmunoblastic (AILD), two patients; angiocentric, two patients and anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), 14 patients. All patients had chemosensitive disease and had received anthracycline-containing regimens prior to transplantation. At the time of HDT, 17 patients were in first PR or CR and 23 were in second or third PR or CR. Conditioning regimens were BEAM in 15 patients, BEAC in 14 patients, cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation (TBI) in eight patients, BEAC, without etoposide and TBI in one patient and mitoxantrone and melphalan in two patients. There were three (7.5%) treatment-related deaths. The estimated overall survival (OS) at 3 years was 58%, the event-free survival (EFS) 48% and the relapse-free survival (RFS) 56%, with a median follow-up of 36 months (range 7-100) for surviving patients. The patients with ALCL tended to have a better prognosis compared to those with other PTCL subtypes, OS 79% vs 44%, respectively. In conclusion, patients with chemosensitive PTCL who are failing to achieve CR with first-line chemotherapy or are in relapse can successfully be treated with HDT and autologous stem cell support.     

Total therapy 2 without thalidomide in comparison with total therapy 1: role of intensified induction and posttransplantation consolidation therapies

Patients with myeloma, treated on the thalidomide arm of total therapy 2 (TT2), had a higher complete response (CR) rate and improved event-free survival (EFS) but not overall survival (OS). To evaluate the benefit of TT2's posttandem autotransplant consolidation chemotherapy and dexamethasone maintenance, outcomes were compared on TT2 without thalidomide (n = 345; median follow-up, 3.5 years) and on predecessor trial TT1 (n = 231; median follow-up, 11.5 years). CR rates were similar (43% vs 41%); however, 5-year estimates of continuous CR (45% vs 32%, P < .001) and 5-year EFS (43% vs 28%, P < .001) were superior with TT2, with a trend for improved OS (62% vs 57%; P = .11). OS was also superior among patients achieving CR and receiving the second transplantation early after the first transplantation. Superior EFS and OS with TT2 versus TT1 was noted in the two thirds presenting without cytogenetic abnormalities (CAs); 4-year posttandem transplantation OS for patients with CAs was 47% with TT1 and 76% with TT2 when combination chemotherapy rather than DEX was applied for consolidation (P = .040). Thus, TT2 (without thalidomide) improved OS of patients without CAs; those with CAs benefited from posttransplantation consolidation chemotherapy. The favorable effects of CR and rapidly sequenced second transplantation attest to the validity of a melphalan dose-response effect in myeloma.     

High-dose therapy followed by autologous purged stem cell transplantation and doxorubicin-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced follicular lymphoma: a randomized multicenter study by the GOELAMS with final results after a median follow-up of 9 years

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as first-line therapy for follicular lymphoma (FL) remains controversial. The multicenter study randomized 172 patients with untreated FL for either immunochemotherapy or high-dose therapy (HDT) followed by purged ASCT. Conditioning was performed with total body irradiation (TBI) and cyclophosphamide. The 9-year overall survival (OS) was similar in the HDT and conventional chemotherapy groups (76% and 80%, respectively). The 9-year progression-free survival (PFS) was higher in the ASCT than the chemotherapy group (64% vs 39%; P = .004). A PFS plateau was observed in the HDT group after 7 years. On multivariate analysis, OS and PFS were independently affected by the per-formance status score, the number of nodal areas involved, and the treatment group. Secondary malignancies were more frequent in the HDT than in the chemotherapy group (6 secondary myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia and 6 second solid tumor cancers vs 1 acute myeloid leukemia, P = .01). The occurrence of a PFS plateau suggests that a subgroup of patients might have their FL cured by ASCT. However, the increased rate of secondary malignancies may discourage the use of purged ASCT in combination with TBI as first-line treatment for FL. This trial has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT00696735.     

Long-term clinical and molecular remissions in patients with mantle cell lymphoma following high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation

Long-term clinical and molecular remissions in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) following high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) have been evaluated in only a few studies. Thirty-six patients with MCL received ASCT in our institution (27 patients undergoing first-line therapy, 8 patients undergoing second-line therapy, and 1 patient undergoing third-line therapy). In the case of long-term remission (≥5 years; n?=?8), peripheral blood was tested for minimal residual disease (MRD) by t(11; 14) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and immunoglobulin heavy-chain (IGH) PCR at the last follow-up. Ten-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and freedom from progression (FFP) after first-line ASCT were 42 %, 43 %, and 54 %; after second-line ASCT, these were all 0 %. Four-year OS, PFS, and FFP for the first-line cohort were 75 %, 48 %, and 61 %, respectively. Four-year OS, PFS, and FFP after second-line ASCT were 55 %, 30 %, and 30 %, respectively. Treatment-related mortality (3 months after ASCT) was 0 %. The only prognostic factor for OS, PFS, and FFP was treatment line (p?=?0.011, p?=?0.046, and p?=?0.023, respectively). No relapses occurred after 5 years following ASCT. So far, eight patients developed sustained long-term clinical and molecular complete remissions of up to 14.6 years following ASCT in the first treatment line. Sustained long-term clinical and molecular remissions can be achieved following ASCT in the first treatment line and apparently less frequent in the second treatment line.     

Early relapse and refractory disease remain risk factors in the anthracycline and autologous transplant era for patients with relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma: a single centre intention-to-treat analysis

An intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was performed in 103 unselected patients with relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) comparing early relapse (<12 months) or failure of first-line therapy (ER/FTF) with late relapses (LR). Seventy one percentage proceeded to high-dose therapy/autologous stem cell rescue (HDT/ASCR) following salvage treatment. By ITT, 5-year overall survival (OS) was 50% for ER/FTF compared to 73% for LR patients (P = 0·012). However OS was equivalent for both groups if salvage treatment response was adequate to proceed to HDT/ASCR. ER/FTF patients remain a high-risk group largely due to a failure of salvage therapy: a point at which novel interventions could impact survival.     

High-dose therapy intensification compared with continued standard chemotherapy in multiple myeloma patients responding to the initial chemotherapy: long-term results from a prospective randomized trial from the Spanish cooperative group PETHEMA

The aim of the present randomized trial was to compare high-dose therapy (HDT) with continued conventional chemotherapy in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who responded to the initial treatment. From May 1994 to October 1999, 216 patients (122 men/94 women; stage II or III; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] score less than 3) entered the study. Initial chemotherapy consisted of 4 cycles of alternating vincristine, BCNU, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, prednisone/vincristine, BCNU, Adriamycin, dexamethasone (VBMCP/VBAD). Responding patients were randomly assigned to receive 8 additional cycles of VBMCP/VBAD, intensification with melphalan 200 mg/m2, or melphalan 140 mg/m2 plus 12 Gy fractionated total body irradiation (TBI). One-hundred sixty-four patients were randomly assigned, 83 to continued chemotherapy and 81 to HDT. The complete remission (CR) rate was significantly higher with HDT (30% vs 11%; P = .002). However, progression-free survival (PFS) was not significantly different between HDT and conventional therapy (median, 42 vs 33 months; P = not significant [NS]), and overall survival (OS) was similar in both groups (median, 61 vs 66 months). Finally, survival after relapse was identical in the 2 arms (15.9 vs 16.4 months). In conclusion, these results show that HDT intensification, when given to myeloma patients who have responded to the initial chemotherapy, significantly increases the CR rate but has no significant impact on PFS or OS.     

ThaDD plus high dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation does not appear superior to ThaDD plus maintenance in elderly patients with de novo multiple myeloma

Objectives: With the aim to address the issue whether high‐dose therapy (HDT) is required after new drugs combinations to improve outcome of elderly newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients, we compared the toxicity and the outcome of ThaDD plus maintenance to those of ThaDD plus HDT‐autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Methods: Sixty‐two patients not eligible for HDT receiving six courses of ThaDD regimen plus maintenance with thalidomide were compared to 26 patients eligible for HDT treated with four courses of ThaDD followed by melphalan 100–200 mg/m² and ASCT. The two groups were matched for the main characteristics except for age favouring the HDT group. Results and conclusions: Complete remission (CR) obtained with ThaDD plus maintenance was 24% whereas it was 57% after ThaDD plus HDT‐ASCT (P = 0.0232). However, after a median follow‐up of 36 months, median time to progression (TTP) and progression free survival (PFS) of the group of patients undergone HDT were not significantly different to those of patients receiving ThaDD plus maintenance (32 vs. 31 months: P = 0.962; 32 vs. 29 months: P = 0.726, respectively). Five‐year overall survival (OS) was 49% in the first group and 46% in the latter one (P = 0.404). As expected, a significantly higher incidence of grade 3–4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, infections, mucositis and alopecia were observed in the ThaDD plus HDT group. Our results suggest that in elderly MM patients ThaDD plus HDT, albeit significantly increases CR rate, seems to be equivalent to ThaDD plus maintenance in terms of TTP, PFS and OS. These results challenge the requirement for HDT consolidation in this subset of patients.     

Intermediate-dose melphalan improves survival of myeloma patients aged 50 to 70: results of a randomized controlled trial

High-dose therapy is an effective standard treatment for multiple myeloma patients. Evidence that intermediate-dose therapy improves survival is limited. At diagnosis, about 70% of patients are older than 65. Intermediate-dose regimen is very well tolerated in older patients. In a multicenter study, 194 patients were randomized to receive at diagnosis either conventional chemotherapy (6 courses of oral melphalan and prednisone [MP]) or intermediate-dose therapy (2 courses of melphalan at 100 mg/m(2) [MEL100]) with stem cell support. Response rate was higher after MEL100. Near-complete remission (nCR) was 6% after MP and 25% after MEL100 (P = .0002). At 3 years, MEL100 increased event-free survival (EFS) from 16% to 37% and overall survival (OS) from 62% to 77% (P < .001). Similar results were observed in patients aged 65 to 70: nCR was 8% after MP and 25% after MEL100 (P = .05); at 3 years, MEL100 improved EFS from 18% to 31% (P = .01) and OS from 58% to 73% (P = .01). Patients aged 65 to 70 had a median OS of 37.2 months (MP) versus 58 months (MEL100). Intermediate-dose melphalan improves response rate, EFS, and OS in myeloma patients, specifically in those aged 65 to 70. It constitutes a more effective first-line regimen than standard treatment for elderly patients.     

PCR detection of residual Bcl-2/IgH-positive cells after high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation is a prognostic factor for event-free survival in patients with low-grade follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

This study was designed to evaluate the results of high-dose therapy followed by purged autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for patients with low-grade follicular non Hodgkin's lymphoma (LGFL), and the prognostic significance of PCR detection of residual Bcl-2/IgH-positive cells after ASCT. Between 1992 and 1998, 49 patients with LGFL received total body irradiation and high-dose cyclophosphamide followed by purged ASCT. PCR amplification of the Bcl-2/IgH rearrangement was performed at diagnosis, on stem cell collections before and after purging and on bone marrow and blood samples after ASCT. With a median follow-up of 76 months (37-103) 34 patients remain alive and event-free. A total of 20 patients had disease recurrence, three patients developed secondary myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). In all, 11 patients died; 10 deaths were because of recurrent disease, one because of MDS. Kaplan-Meier estimates of event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) at 5 years were 65% (+/-7%) and 77% (+/-6%), respectively. Patients who achieved a sustained molecular complete response (CR) had a lower risk of disease recurrence and experienced significantly longer EFS (93% (+/-6%) vs 11% (+/-7%) P=0.0008) and OS (100 vs 55% (+/-12%) P=0.0057). In conclusion, myeloablative therapy followed by purged ASCT may induce long EFS in patients with LGFL. The achievement of sustained molecular CR after ASCT improves EFS and OS.     

High-dose therapy and autologous transplantation for lymphoma: The Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute experience

Abstract
Background: High-dose therapy (HDT) with autologous bone marrow or blood cell transplantation for the treatment of lymphoma commenced at Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute in 1986.
Aim: To examine the patient characteristics and outcomes of patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin's disease (HD) treated with HDT and autologous transplantation at our Institute in the first 10 years of the service (1986–95).
Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed examining patient characteristics, prior chemotherapy regimens, pretransplant disease status, HDT regimen, source of stem cells, time for haematopoietic recovery, complications of transplantation, response rates, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
Results: Sixty-seven patients with NHL were treated with an estimated 5-year OS rate of 44% (95% confidence interval (CI) 32–56%) and PFS rate of 34% (95% CI 21–44%). Factors independently predictive of an unfavourable PFS on multivariate analyses were presence of constitutional symptoms at transplant ( P < 0.002) and chemotherapy-resistant disease at transplant ( P = 0.02). Twenty-three patients with HD were treated with a 5-year predicted OS rate of 74% (95% CI 56–92%) and PFS rate of 57% (95% CI 36–77%). There was no difference in PFS for HD patients who relapsed either within 12 months of completion of front-line therapy or after this time ( P = 0.5). The transplant-related mortality for the entire cohort was 17%, with a progressive decrease over time.
Conclusion: HDT with autologous transplanta- tion achieves durable PFS and OS in patients with lymphoma. Improved patient selection, therapy modifications according to prognostic factors and ongoing improvements in supportive care should improve outcomes further. (Intern Med J 2001; 31: 279–289)     

Overall and event-free survival are not improved by the use of myeloablative therapy following intensified chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma: a prospective randomized phase 3 study

We compared the efficacy of intensified chemotherapy followed by myeloablative therapy and autologous stem cell rescue with intensified chemotherapy alone in patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma. There were 261 eligible patients younger than 66 years with stage II/III multiple myeloma who were randomized after remission induction therapy with vincristine, adriamycin, dexamethasone (VAD) to receive intensified chemotherapy, that is, melphalan 140 mg/m(2) administered intravenously in 2 doses of 70 mg/m(2) (intermediate-dose melphalan [IDM]) without stem cell rescue (n = 129) or the same regimen followed by myeloablative therapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, total body irradiation, and autologous stem cell reinfusion (n = 132). Interferon-alpha-2a was given as maintenance. Of the eligible patients, 79% received both cycles of IDM and 79% of allocated patients actually received myeloablative treatment. The response rate (complete remission [CR] plus partial remission [PR]) was 88% in the intensified chemotherapy group versus 95% in the myeloablative treatment group. CR was significantly higher after myeloablative therapy (13% versus 29%; P =.002). With a median follow-up of 33 months (range, 8-65 months), the event-free survival (EFS) was not different between the treatments (median 21 months versus 22 months; P =.28). Time to progression (TTP) was significantly longer after myeloablative treatment (25 months versus 31 months; P =.04). The overall survival (OS) was not different (50 months versus 47 months; P =.41). Intensified chemotherapy followed by myeloablative therapy as first-line treatment for multiple myeloma resulted in a higher CR and a longer TTP when compared with intensified chemotherapy alone. However, it did not result in a better EFS and OS.     

Transplantation as salvage therapy for high-risk patients with myeloma in relapse

Patients with myeloma relapsing after tandem transplant have a poor survival and treatment options are limited. The role of additional salvage transplant procedures for these patients is unknown. To evaluate the benefit and identify prognostic factors, the outcome of 76 consecutive patients with recurrent myeloma after tandem transplant receiving salvage transplants (ST) was analyzed. Prior to ST, 23 patients (30%) had shown chemosensitive response to preceding salvage chemotherapy: two complete remissions (CR); eight near CRs (nCR: only immunofixation positive); 13 partial remissions (PR >or=75% reduction in M protein). Fifty received an autologous transplant, 22 a sibling-matched allogeneic transplant, and four a matched-unrelated allogeneic transplant. Overall response after ST was 59%: eight CRs (11%); 14 nCRs (18%); 23 PRs (30%). Overall survival (OS) at 2 years was 19%; 2 year event-free survival rate (EFS) 7%. On univariate analysis for survival, only pre-transplant chemosensitive relapse (P < 0.05), serum albumin >3 g/dl (P = 0.001), normal LDH (P = 0.04), and long interval between the second transplant and relapse/progression were significant beneficial factors. In a Cox proportional hazard model, chemosensitive relapse, and albumin >3 g/dl were significant for better OS: hazard ratio (HR) 1.4, 1.7, respectively, while normal LDH, and absence of CA13 were significant for better EFS: HR 1.8, 1.7, respectively. Patients with albumin >3 g/dl who had chemosensitive disease before ST (n = 16) had a median survival of 16 months, compared to 7 months (n = 34) and 2 months (n = 26) for patients with only one (n = 34) or no favorable prognostic factors (n = 28), respectively (P < 0.001). Their survival at 2 years post-ST was 43%, 17% and 11%, respectively. Our study suggests further transplantation should only be considered in the setting of a clinical trial in patients with favorable prognostic factors.     

Sustained complete remissions in multiple myeloma linked to bortezomib in total therapy 3: comparison with total therapy 2

Total therapy 3 (TT3), incorporating bortezomib up-front into a tandem transplant regimen for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM), effected 2-year complete response (CR) estimates >90%, which appeared superior to results reported for total therapy 2 (TT2). With median follow-up times of 2 years with TT3 and 5 years with TT2, the clinical outcomes of 303 patients in the former and 668 in the latter trial were compared, including the subset of 607 patients with gene expression profiling (GEP) data. With similar baseline prognostic factors, event-free survival (EFS) ( P  = 0·0002) and CR duration ( P  = 0·003) were superior with TT3 vs. TT2 with a strong trend noted also for improved overall survival (OS) ( P  = 0·16). In the GEP-defined FGFR3 subgroup, TT3 imparted significantly superior OS, EFS and CR duration vis-à-vis TT2. Matching 300 patients each by standard prognostic factors, TT3 yielded superior EFS and CR duration and borderline superior OS. The advantage of TT3 still pertained when the comparison was limited to patients who completed TT2 consolidation rapidly within 24 months. Our data strongly suggest that the addition of bortezomib in TT3 was accountable for its superior performance rather than greater compliance with protocol completion as a result of greater dose-density in TT3 vs. TT2.