Common chromosomal fragile sites and cancer: focus on FRA16D

A growing body of experimental evidence supports the view that certain human chromosomal fragile sites have roles to play in cancer. The principle lines of evidence are at the level of mutation mechanism and gene function. Most research in this area has previously focussed on the FRA3B common fragile site and the FHIT gene that spans this site. Here we review recent progress in characterising the second most readily observed common fragile site, FRA16D, and the WWOX gene that spans it. Comparative analyses of FRA3B/FHIT and FRA16D/WWOX reveal some striking similarities suggesting that these sites and their associated genes may play a part in a normal protective response of cells to environmental stress.     

Expression of folate sensitive and aphidicolin induced chromosomal fragile sites in familial neuroblastoma

The expression of folate sensitive and aphidicolin induced fragile sites in the blood lymphocyte chromosomes of affected and unaffected members from 2 neuroblastoma families were studied. The subjects included 4 neuroblastoma patients, and 9 of their clinically healthy first degree relatives and corresponding number of age and sex matched controls. Lymphocytes cultured in folate deprived culture medium showed rare fragile sites at band p13.1 of chromosome 1, in a frequency of 3%-5% in all the 4 neuroblastoma patients. In aphidicolin treated cultures, the patients and unaffected members in neuroblastoma families, showed hypersensitivity to aphidicolin, as evidenced by the significant increase in percentage of aberration/cell (ab/c) and damaged cells (dc), over that of controls (P < 0.01). Aphidicolin induced fragile sites were more pronounced in chromosomes 1 and 2. A larger number of subjects have to be studied to prove whether altered fragile site expression may be a cytogenetic evidence for an individual or familial cancer predisposing genetic constitution.     

Common fragile sites

Common fragile sites are regions showing site-specific gaps and breaks on metaphase chromosomes after partial inhibition of DNA synthesis. Common fragile sites are normally stable in somatic cells. However, following treatment of cultured cells with replication inhibitors, fragile sites display gaps, breaks, rearrangements and other features of unstable DNA. Studies showing that fragile sites and associated genes are frequently deleted or rearranged in many cancer cells have clearly demonstrated their importance in genome instability in cancer. Until recently, little was known about the molecular nature and mechanisms involved in fragile site instability. From studies conducted in many laboratories, it is now known that fragile sites extend over large regions, are associated with genes, exhibit delayed replication, and contain regions of high DNA flexibility. Recent findings from our laboratory showing that the key cell cycle checkpoint genes are important for genome stability at fragile sties have shed new light on these mechanisms and on the significance of these sites in cancer and normal chromosome structure. Since their discovery over two decades ago, much has been learned regarding their significance in chromosome structure and instability in cancer, but a number of key questions remain, including why these sites are 'fragile' and the impact of this instability on associated genes in cancer cells. These and other questions have been addressed by participants of this meeting, which highlighted instability at common fragile sites. This brief review is intended to provide background on common fragile sites that has led up to many of the studies presented in the accompanying reports in this volume and not to summarize the findings presented therein. Some aspects of this review were taken from Glover et al. (T.W. Glover, M.F. Arlt, A.M. Casper, S.G. Durkin, Mechanisms of common fragile site instability, Hum. Molec. Genet. 14 (in press). [1]).     

Relationship between chemical-induced fragile sites and chromosomal breakpoints in malignant cells in children.

Many fragile sites in the human genome occur at or near chromosomal breakpoints reportedly involved in translocations of DNA material in neoplastic cells. This fact has led some investigators to postulate that fragile sites have a pathogenic role in human neoplasia. To learn whether caffeine-induced fragile sites relate to breakpoints found in the neoplastic cells of an individual patient, we studied lymphocytes from the peripheral blood of 32 patients in remission from malignant disease. Lymphocytes were cultured in medium containing either 5-Fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FdU) or FdU plus caffeine, and G-banded metaphases were examined for nonrandom breaks. Analyses of completely G-banded malignant cell chromosomes from 31 of the 32 patients were available for comparison. In only once case, a 5-year-old child with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, did a caffeine-induced fragile site (1q44) coincide with a breakpoint in the neoplastic cells [dup(1)(q21-->q44)]. Our findings suggest that chromosomal abnormalities in childhood malignancies cannot generally be explained by the presence of FdU- or FdU plus caffeine-induced fragile sites.     

Constitutive overexpression of CDC25A in primary human mammary epithelial cells results in both defective DNA damage response and chromosomal breaks at fragile sites

CDC25A phosphatase, an essential component of the cell cycle machinery, is also a key player in integrating the specific signals of checkpoint control in response to DNA damage. There are several lines of evidence that indicate a role for CDC25A in cancer development, consistent with the fact that its overexpression is detected in human cancers. In particular we previously reported that CDC25A is overexpressed also in early breast carcinoma. Recent data suggest that oncogene activation during early stages of tumor development causes DNA replication stress resulting in the induction of DNA damage response (DDR) and that the selection of cells defecting in their DDR could lead to malignant progression. To address how CDC25A overexpression contributes to breast cancer development we established a cell model in which CDC25A was constitutively overexpressed in hTERT-immortalized primary human mammary epithelial cells. At the earliest passages following CDC25A transduction we observed DDR signs associated with unscheduled DNA replication origins. In the latest passages DDR was significantly impaired and, even after ionizing radiation exposition, cells failed to induce G1 and G2 checkpoints; moreover DNA replication stress conditions, such as aphidicolin treatment, highlighted increased fragile site breakages and destabilized chromosomes just in these latest passages cells. Our data suggest that CDC25A overexpression, pushing the cell through the cell cycle transitions, induces DDR alterations that might enhance genomic instability.     

Depletion of CHK1, but not CHK2, induces chromosomal instability and breaks at common fragile sites

Common fragile sites are specific regions of the genome that form gaps and breaks on metaphase chromosomes when DNA synthesis is partially inhibited. Fragile sites and their associated genes show frequent deletions and other rearrangements in cancer cells, and may be indicators of DNA replication stress early in tumorigenesis. We have previously shown that the DNA damage response proteins ATR, BRCA1 and FANCD2 play critical roles in maintaining the stability of fragile site regions. To further elucidate the pathways regulating fragile site stability, we have investigated the effects of depletion of the cell cycle checkpoint kinases, CHK1 and CHK2 on common fragile site stability in human cells. We demonstrate that both CHK1 and CHK2 are activated following treatment of cells with low doses of aphidicolin that induce fragile site breakage. Furthermore, we show that depletion of CHK1, but not CHK2, using short-interfering RNA (siRNA) leads to highly destabilized chromosomes and specific common fragile site breakage. In many cells, CHK1 depletion resulted in extensive chromosome fragmentation, which was distinct from endonucleolytic cleavage commonly associated with apoptosis. These findings demonstrate a critical role for the CHK1 kinase in regulating chromosome stability, and in particular, common fragile site stability.     

Chromatin structure related to oncogenesis

Chromatin is the fundamental structure of genomic DNA in eukaryotic cells. The nucleosome, the primary unit of chromatin, consists of DNA and histone proteins, and is important for the maintenance of genomic DNA. Histone mutations are present in many types of cancers, suggesting that chromatin and/or nucleosome structures could be closely related to cancer development. Histone modifications and histone variants are also involved in regulating chromatin and nucleosome structures. Chromatin structures are dynamically changed by nucleosome binding proteins. In this review article, we discuss the current progress toward understanding the relationship between chromatin structure and cancer development.     

The molecular basis of common and rare fragile sites

Fragile sites are specific loci that form gaps and constrictions on chromosomes exposed to partial replication stress. Fragile sites are classified as rare or common, depending on their induction and frequency within the population. These loci are known to be involved in chromosomal rearrangements in tumors and are associated with human diseases. Therefore, the understanding of the molecular basis of fragile sites is of high significance. Here we discuss the works performed in recent years that investigated the characteristics of fragile sites which underlie their inherent instability.     

Chromosomal fragile sites to lymphoma with observation of 40 patients

Chromosomal fragile sites studies were performed in 40 patients with lymphoma and 30 individuals as healthy controls. The results showed that there was a statistical difference of chromosomal aberration between the two groups; The patients carried 46 fragile sites totally; 21 out of 46 fragile sites in lymphoma corresponded with cancer breakpoints, and 9 fragile sites were located in the bands where concogenes exist. These suggest a certain association between fragile sites, cancer breakpoints and oncogenes and thus indicate a possible important role of fragile sites in the pathogenesis of lymphoma.     

Oncosuppressor proteins of fragile sites are reduced in cervical cancer

FHIT and WWOX are tumor suppressor genes that span the common fragile sites FRA3B and FRA16D, respectively. To analyze possible synergisms among these genes in cervical cancer progression, we considered 159 cervical intraepithelial neoplasias, and 58 invasive squamous cell carcinomas of the uterine cervix. All cases were previously selected as high risk HPV. FHIT and WWOX proteins were examined by immunohistochemistry and their expression was inversely correlated with precancerous vs. invasive lesions. Statistics among biological markers indicated an association between FHIT and WWOX. Protein expression of these two genes was also absent or reduced in cancer cell lines. Thus, WWOX may be considered as a novel important genetic marker in cervical cancer and the association between the altered expression of FHIT and WWOX may be a critical event in the progression of this neoplasia.     

A novel approach to simultaneously scan genes at fragile sites

Background  

Fragile sites are regions of the genome sensitive to replication stress and to exposure to environmental carcinogens. The two most commonly expressed fragile sites FRA3B and FRA16D host the histidine triad (FHIT) and WW domain containing oxidoreductase (WWOX) genes respectively. There is growing evidence that both genes contribute to cancer development and they are frequently altered by allelic and homozygous deletions in a variety of tumors. Their status is linked to prognosis in several malignancies and they are thought to be involved in early tumorigenesis.     

A novel approach to simultaneously scan genes at fragile sites

Background

Previous studies indicate that alterations in Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) class I expression are frequent in colorectal tumors. This would suggest serious limitations for immunotherapy-based strategies involving T-cell recognition. Distinct patterns of HLA surface expression might conceal different immune escape mechanisms employed by the tumors and are worth further study.

Method

We applied four-color multiparameter flow cytometry (FCM), using a large panel of alloantigen-specific anti-HLA-A and -B monoclonal antibodies, to study membranous expression of individual HLA alleles in freshly isolated colorectal cancer cell suspensions from 21 patients.

Results

Alterations in HLA class I phenotype were observed in 8 (38%) of the 21 tumors and comprised loss of a single A or B alleles in 4 cases, and loss of all four A and B alleles in the other 4 cases. Seven of these 8 tumors were located on the right side of the colon, and those showing loss of both HLA-A and -B membranous expression were all of the MSI-H phenotype.

Conclusion

FCM allows the discrimination of complex phenotypes related to the expression of HLA class I. The different patterns of HLA class I expression might underlie different tumor behavior and influence the success rate of immunotherapy.     

Genetic alterations in cancer as a result of breakage at fragile sites

The organization and replication of DNA render fragile sites (FSs) prone to breakage, recombination as well as becoming preferential targets for mutagens-carcinogens and integration of oncogenic viruses. For many years, attempts to link FSs and cancer generated mostly circumstantial evidence. The discoveries that chromosome translocations, amplification of proto-oncogenes, deletion of tumor suppressor genes, and integration of oncogenic viruses all result from the specific breakage of genomic DNA at FSs, however, have provided compelling support for such a link, further suggesting a causative role for FSs in cancer.     

Identification of the human/mouse syntenic common fragile site FRA7K/Fra12C1--relation of FRA7K and other human common fragile sites on chromosome 7 to evolutionary breakpoints

Common fragile sites (CFSs) are expressed as chromosome gaps in cells of different species including human and mouse as a result of the inhibition of DNA replication. They may serve as hot spots for DNA breakage in processes such as tumorigenesis and chromosome evolution. Using multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization mapping, the authors describe here human CFS FRA7K on chromosome band 7q31.1 and its murine homolog Fra12C1. Within the syntenic FRA7K/Fra12C1 region lies the IMMP2L/Immp2l gene with a size of 899/983 kb. The authors further mapped 2 amplification breakpoints of the breast cancer cell line SKBR3 to the CFSs FRA7G and FRA7H. The 5 molecularly defined CFSs on chromosome 7 do not preferentially colocalize with synteny breaks between the human and mouse genomes and with intragenomic duplications that have occurred during chromosome evolution. In addition, in contrast to all currently reported data, CFSs in chromosome band 7q31 do not show increased DNA helix flexibility in comparison with control regions without CFS expression.     

FRA3B and other common fragile sites: the weakest links

In 1979, the first chromosome alteration associated with familial cancer was reported. Five years later, a fragile site was observed in the same chromosome region. The product of the fragile histidine triad (FHIT) gene, which encompasses this fragile site, is partially or entirely lost in most human cancers, indicating that it has a tumour-suppressor function. Inactivation of only one FHIT allele compromises this suppressor function, indicating that a 'one-hit' mechanism of tumorigenesis is operative. Are genes disrupted at other fragile sites? And, are these genes also tumour suppressors?