培哚普利与卡托普利治疗原发性高血压各60例的比较

目的 :比较培哚普利与卡托普利对原发性高血压的治疗作用。方法 :中度原发性高血压病人12 0例 ,随机分为 2组。培哚普利组 60例 (男性 4 5例 ,女性 15例 ;年龄 60±s 15a) ,采用培哚普利 4～ 8mg ,po ,qd× 4wk ;卡托普利组 60例 (男性 4 5例 ,女性 15例 ;年龄 60± 14a) ,采用卡托普利 12 .5～ 2 5mg ,po ,tid× 4wk。每组 16例进行了 2 4h动态血压监测。结果 :培哚普利组总有效率为92 % ,卡托普利组总有效率为 78% ,2组差异不显著(P >0 .0 5) ;不良反应发生率 ,培哚普利组 12 % ,卡托普利组 2 8% (P <0 .0 5) ,均轻微。结论 :培哚普利与卡托普利对中度高血压病疗效均较好 ,培哚普利组不良反应较少     

赖诺普利治疗原发性轻中度老年高血压

目的 :观察赖诺普利治疗原发性轻、中度老年高血压的疗效及不良反应。方法 :76例轻、中度原发性老年高血压病人 ,分为赖诺普利组 4 6例 ,用赖诺普利 2 0～ 30mg ,po ,qd。吲哒帕胺组 30例 ,用吲哒帕胺 2 .5～ 5mg ,po ,qd ,均维持治疗 8wk。结果 :赖诺普利组总有效率 85% ;吲哒帕胺组总有效率 57%。 2组差异有非常显著意义 (P <0 .0 1)。 2组治疗前后收缩压 /舒张压下降分别为 (4 .0± 1.6 )kPa/ (2 .3± 1.1)kPa和 (2 .4± 1.0 )kPa/ (1.3± 1.1)kPa ,2组差异有非常显著意义 (P <0 .0 1)。结论 :赖诺普利治疗轻、中度老年高血压疗效优于吲哒帕胺 ,可作为治疗原发性轻、中度老年高血压的一线药物。     

坎地沙坦酯与培哚普利联合治疗对高血压患者尿微量白蛋白影响的临床观察

目的坎地沙坦酯与培哚普利联合治疗对高血压患者尿微量白蛋白的影响。方法选择90例原发性高血压合并有微量蛋白尿患者,随机分为坎地沙坦酯组、培哚普利组及坎地沙坦酯与培哚普利联合组,分别予以坎地沙坦酯8mg/d,培哚普利4mg/d,及坎地沙坦酯8mg/d联合培哚普利4mg/d口服,治疗8周,观察治疗前后3组血压及尿微量白蛋白、血肌酐值,并进行比较。结果培哚普利组和坎地沙坦酯组患者经8周治疗,血压降至正常,微量尿蛋白排泄量明显减少(P<0.01),联合组较其他组进一步下降(P<0.05)。培哚普利组有1例出现干咳而改用其他药物。结论坎地沙坦酯与培哚普利联合能更加有效减少高血压患者微量白蛋白尿排泄量,保护肾功能。     

培哚普利与美托洛尔对高血压病左室肥厚及糖、胰岛素代谢的影响

目的 :观察培哚普利与美托洛尔治疗原发性高血压的降血压疗效及其对左心室肥厚 (LVH)、糖与胰岛素代谢的影响。方法 :74例原发性高血压且无糖尿病病人 ,随机分为 2组 ,培哚普利组用培哚普利 4～ 8mg ,po ,qd ,美托洛尔组用美托洛尔12 .5～ 5 0mg ,po ,bid ,治疗 2 4wk。比较治疗前后血压、左心室重量指数 (LVWI)、空腹血糖、空腹胰岛素的变化。结果 :两者均能显著降低血压 ,培哚普利治疗 2 4wk后LVWI明显减轻 ,空腹胰岛素较治疗前下降 ,空腹血糖略有降低。美托洛尔对LVWI及空腹血糖、空腹胰岛素无影响。结论 :培哚普利和美托洛尔均能明显降低血压 ,培哚普利降压的同时可能减轻LVH、改善胰岛素代谢     

血管紧张素Ⅱ受体拮抗剂、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、钙拮抗剂对原发性高血压患者血尿酸水平的影响

目的观察血管紧张素Ⅱ受体拮抗剂(AngiotensinⅡreceptor antagonist,ARB)、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor,ACEI)与钙离子通道拮抗剂(Calcium antagonist,CCB)对高血压患者血尿酸水平的影响。方法入选原发性高血压患者582例,随机分为氯沙坦钾组、替米沙坦组、硝苯地平控释片组、苯磺酸氨氯地平组、培哚普利组、盐酸贝那普利组及对照组,观察患者治疗前及治疗后血尿酸及血压的变化。结果经过8周治疗,与对照组相比,氯沙坦钾组、替米沙坦组、硝苯地平控释片组、培哚普利组、盐酸贝那普利组血尿酸水平均明显下降(P<0.05);与用药前相比,各组患者血压均得到明显控制(P<0.05)。结论对于原发性1~2级高血压患者,ARB类的氯沙坦钾、替米沙坦、ACEI类培哚普利、盐酸贝那普利、CCB类硝苯地平控释片均能降低患者血尿酸水平。     

氯沙坦治疗原发性高血压的疗效观察

目的评价氯沙坦治疗原发性高血压的疗效和安全性,并与苯那普利进行对比.方法氯沙坦和苯那普利随机、单盲治疗轻、中度I、Ⅱ期原发性高血压患者66例,氯沙坦剂量为50mg/d,苯那普利剂量为10mg/d;治疗2周效果不佳者剂量增至氯沙坦100mg/d或苯那普利20mg/d,总疗程6周.观察氯沙坦的疗效、动态血压变化及不良反应.结果氯沙坦与苯那普利组总有效率分别为84.8%,81.8%,组间差异无显著性(P＞0.05),两组降压谷峰比值(T/p)均大于60%.氯沙坦组咳嗽发生率低于苯那普利组.结论氯沙坦治疗轻、中度原发性高血压安全有效,耐受性好,副作用少.     

小剂量培哚普利吲达帕胺片治疗原发性高血压疗效观察

目的：探讨小剂量培哚普利吲达帕胺片治疗原发性高血压的疗效与安全性。方法：原发性轻中度高血压患者106例分为两组,观察组54例给予培哚普利吲哒帕胺片1片（培哚普利2 mg,吲哒帕胺0.625 mg）,qd,对照组52例给予培哚普利片4 mg,qd。治疗8周后,比较两组血压达标率、临床疗效,以及两组不良反应发生情况。结果：治疗后,观察组总有效率88.8%,对照组总有效率80.7%,两组比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。两组治疗后SBP和DSP均较治疗前明显下降（P〈0.05）,且观察组改善效果优于对照组（P〈0.05）。观察组不良反应发生率比较,明显低于对照组（P〈0.05）。结论：小剂量培哚普利吲达帕胺片治疗原发性高血压可提高血压达标率,降压效果较好,且不良反应少,值得临床推广应用。     

培哚普利治疗高血压病76例

目的 :通过与卡托普利对比 ,评价培哚普利治疗高血压的疗效 ,以及对血清总胆固醇 (TC)、三酰甘油 (TG)、血糖 (Glu)、肌酐 (Cr)等的影响。方法 :回顾性分析 12 6例 1～ 2级高血压病患者的临床资料 ,培哚普利组 76例 (培哚普利 2～ 4mg ,qd) ;卡托普利组 5 0例 (国产卡托普利 2 5～ 5 0mg ,tid)。疗程均为 4wk ,治疗前后有水银柱血压计的偶测BP和 2 4h动态BP记录 ,以及清晨空腹测量血清TC ,TG ,Glu ,Cr等指标。结果 :2组治疗后偶测BP ,2 4h平均BP和BP负荷均明显降低 ,培哚普利组的总有效率明显高于卡托普利组 (96 1%vs80 % ,P <0 0 5 ) ,峰谷比值培哚普利也明显优于卡托普利 (SBP :6 8 6mmHgvs 4 8 7mmHg ,DBP :70 2mmHgvs 5 1 4mmHg ,P <0 0 5 ) ,2组刺激性咳嗽的发生率类似 (15 8%vs 18% ,P >0 0 5 )。培哚普利组治疗后TG ,Glu比治疗前明显降低。结论 :培哚普利是一种安全有效的控制高血压的药物 ,疗效明显优于国产卡托普利 ;并能够改善高血压病患者的血糖和脂质代谢     

培哚普利与卡托普利治疗原发性高血压的疗效比较

目的比较培哚普利与卡托普利治疗原发性高血压的疗效。方法回顾性分析120例原发性高血压患者的临床资料,依据治疗方式不同分为培哚普利组和卡托普利组。结果两组患者24h动态血压监测效果比较,差异元统计学意义（P〉0．05）;但是卡托普利组偶测血压效果低于培哚普利组,不良反应发生率高于培哚普利组,服药依从性差于培哚普利组（均P〈0．05）。结论培哚普利治疗原发性高血压效果优于卡托普利,而不良反应低于卡托普利,值得临床推广应用。     

乐卡地平与培哚普利联合治疗轻中度高血压疗效及安全性观察

目的评价乐卡地平与培哚普利小剂量单独治疗和联合治疗轻度原发性高血压的疗效及安全性。方法 180例轻度原发性高血压患者随机分成联合治疗组（A组）和单用乐卡地平组（B组）和单用培哚普利组（C组）。A组服用培哚普利2 mg·d^-1＋乐卡地平5 mg·d^-1;B组服用乐卡地平10 mg·d^-1;C组服用培哚普利4 mg·d^-1。分别观察三组治疗后4、8、12周后降压效果及安全性。结果联合治疗组第4周开始,血压达标率及血压下降幅度均优于单药治疗组,三组间差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。联合治疗组治疗期间不良事件发生4例,明显低于单药治疗组（乐卡地平组7例,培哚普利组19例）,差异有显著性（P〈0.05）。结论乐卡地平与培哚普利联合应用可明显增加降压幅度和降压速度、提高降压有效率,两药小剂量联合可减少药物不良反应发生率。     

Perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day: a review of its place in the management of hypertension

The fixed low-dose combination of the ACE inhibitor perindopril and the non-thiazide diuretic indapamide has been evaluated in the management of patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Combination therapy aims to improve overall therapeutic efficacy while minimising adverse effects. In well-designed multicentre clinical trials, perindopril/indapamide at doses ranging from 2/0.625 to 8/2.5 mg/day was significantly more effective than placebo in achieving adequate blood pressure (BP) control. A similar reduction in supine BP was observed when combined perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day was compared with losartan 50 mg/day or atenolol 50 mg/day. Similar reductions in 24-hour ambulatory BP were also seen with perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day and irbesartan 150 mg/day. However, response and normalisation rates were significantly higher with combination therapy than with losartan or irbesartan monotherapy. Combined perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day therapy effectively reduced BP in elderly patients aged 65 to 85 years to a significantly greater extent than either atenolol 50 mg/day or placebo. Supine BP was also normalised in approximately two-thirds of patients in a small noncomparative trial in patients with hypertension and renal impairment. Low-dose perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day was well tolerated in clinical trials; the most common adverse events were headache and cough. Hypokalaemia, associated with the use of diuretics, occurred with a higher incidence with combined perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day therapy than with either atenolol 50 mg/day or placebo. Perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day has shown efficacy in well designed comparative trials with atenolol, losartan and irbesartan including elderly patients and patients with renal impairment. Studies comparing this dosage of perindopril/ indapamide with other combination therapies would be beneficial in allowing the place of perindopril/indapamide to be more accurately determined. The fixed-low dose combination of perindopril/indapamide provides a promising and well tolerated treatment option in the management of patients with mild to moderate hypertension.     

氯沙坦、吲哒帕胺单药或联合治疗对血压、血钾和尿酸的影响

目的 :观察氯沙坦、吲哒帕胺单药及联合治疗对原发性高血压病人血压、血钾和血尿酸的影响。方法 :60例轻、中度原发性高血压病人 ,男性 3 4例 ,女性 2 6例 ,年龄 (4 6±s9)a,分为 3组 ,每组 2 0例。氯沙坦组服氯沙坦 5 0mg,po,qd ;吲哒帕胺组服吲哒帕胺 2 .5mg ,po,qd;联合治疗组 2药服法同上 ,疗程均为 1 2wk。检测各组治疗前后血压、血钾和尿酸值。结果 :3组治疗后收缩压和舒张压均较治疗前明显降低 (P <0 .0 1 ) ,联合治疗组降压幅度最大 ,1 2wk时收缩压下降(3 .4± 1 .1 )kPa,舒张压下降 (2 .7± 0 .5 )kPa。吲哒帕胺组治疗后血钾值较治疗前降低 ,氯沙坦组血钾上升 ,但均在正常范围之内。吲哒帕胺组血尿酸升高而氯沙坦组则降低 ,与治疗前相比有非常显著意义 (P <0 .0 1 )。联合治疗组治疗前后血钾和血尿酸无明显变化 (P >0 .0 5 )。结论 :氯沙坦有降低血尿酸的作用 ,其与吲哒帕胺联合治疗不仅有协同降压作用 ,而且能抵消吲哒帕胺单用所引起的血钾下降和血尿酸上升的不良反应     

Efficacité comparée des trois stratégies antihypertensives recommandées en Europe

The latest European Guidelines for the treatment of hypertension recommend the use of low-dose combination therapies as the first line strategy.This paper presents the preliminary results of a recent study comparing the perindopril/indapamide combination treatment with sequential and step by step strategies. The 9-month randomised double-blind study included 533 patients.Patients were shown to have better blood pressure control without adverse effects following treatment with the perindopril/indapamide combination than with the sequential strategy of atenolol (50 mg) then losartan (50 mg) then amlodipine (5 mg) or with the step-by-step strategy of valsartan (40 mg then 80 mg, then 80 mg plus hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg). In addition, the perindopril/indapamide combination was shown to induce significantly greater control of systolic blood pressure levels with comparable effects on diastolic blood pressure.     

Perindopril + indapamide: new preparation. Simple trick

(1) The combination of perindopril 4 mg + indapamide 1.25 mg is approved for second-line treatment of hypertension after failure of perindopril alone. (2) The other combination, of a low dose of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (2 mg of perindopril) and a diuretic (0.625 mg of indapamide), is being promoted as first-line treatment of hypertension. (3) The clinical files for both preparations are limited to the strict minimum. (4) A dose-finding study showed that the perindopril 4 mg + indapamide 1.25 mg dose combination offered the best risk-benefit ratio by comparison with combinations containing the same perindopril dose but other indapamide doses. (5) A double-blind trial suggests that the antihypertensive activity of the perindopril 4 mg + indapamide 1.25 mg combination is equivalent to that of the captopril 50 mg + hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg and enalapril 20 mg + hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg combinations. The safety profile was the same for the three combinations. (6) The 2-mg perindopril combination has not been compared with perindopril monotherapy at the usual dose of 4 mg, or with indapamide monotherapy at a mean dose of 2.5 mg. (7) The two combinations are costlier than their competitors.     

Perindopril. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disorders.

Perindopril is a long acting angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, which displays similar pharmacodynamic properties to other agents in this class. In common with enalapril, it is also a prodrug. After absorption, perindopril is hydrolysed to the active metabolite, perindoprilat, and with once daily administration adequate 24-hour inhibition of ACE is obtained. Perindopril 4 to 8mg once daily is usually effective for blood pressure control in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Those patients who do not respond adequately to monotherapy with perindopril usually respond with the addition of a second agent, such as a thiazide diuretic. General practice trials indicate that perindopril is at least as effective and as well tolerated as usual therapeutic dosages of captopril, atenolol or hydrochlorothiazide plus amiloride in mild to moderate essential hypertension. Preliminary results indicate that perindopril may also be effective in patients with severe hypertension or congestive heart failure. Perindopril is generally well tolerated and has an adverse effect profile similar to that of other ACE inhibitors. It further clinical experience confirms initial findings, perindopril is likely to represent a useful alternative to other members of the ACE inhibitor class in all grades of hypertension and congestive heart failure.     

氯沙坦单用、与吲哒帕胺或氢氯噻嗪合用对高血压患者血压、血钾、血尿酸的影响

目的: 分析评价氯沙坦单用、与吲哒帕胺或氢氯噻嗪合用对高血压患者血压、血钾、尿酸的影响.方法: 选择60例轻、中度原发性高血压患者,分为3组,每组20例.氯沙坦组;氯沙坦 吲哒帕胺组;氯沙坦 氢氯噻嗪组.观察8wk,检测各组治疗前后的血压、血钾、血尿酸的变化.结果: 与治疗前相比,治疗后3组血压下降效果明显(P＜0.01);氯沙坦组和氯沙坦 氢氯噻嗪组血尿酸治疗后明显降低(分别为P＜0.01,P＜0.05),氯沙坦 吲哒帕胺组无明显变化(P＞0.05);3组治疗前后血钾无明显变化(P＞0.05).结论: 氯沙坦有降低尿酸的作用,与吲哒帕胺或氢氯噻嗪合用有协同降压作用,并可改善单用吲哒帕胺或氢氯噻嗪所引起的血钾下降、血尿酸升高的不良反应.     

固定剂量的培哚普利和氨氯地平治疗原发性高血压的有效性和耐受性

目的观察固定剂量的培哚普利和氨氯地平联用治疗原发性高血压的有效性和耐受性。方法未经治疗的Ⅱ级高血压（BP≥160/100mm Hg）患者、单一药物或其他合并用药未能控制的高血压（BP≥140/90mm Hg）患者进行观察。患者每天服用固定剂量的培哚普利（4mg）和氨氯地平（5mg）共60d。给药前、给药15、30d以及60d分别测定患者血压。服药期间每周进行常规检查、随访不良事件及依从性。结果试验共纳入112名患者,其中有106名完成60d的治疗。治疗60d后所有患者平均收缩压和舒张压相对于治疗前显著降低（-41.9±8.5/-22.8±5.6）mm Hg,分别降低25.8%和22.9%。所有患者67.8%经治疗后血压达标。对亚组进行分析：未经治疗的高血压患者、单一药物没有控制的高血压患者以及其他合并用药没能控制血压的患者经治疗后血压达标62.8%、62.3%和58.8%。固定剂量的培哚普利和氨氯地平联用安全、耐受。结论固定剂量的培哚普利和氨氯地平联用为治疗原发性高血压安全、有效的治疗方法,并且临床依从性好。     

Antihypertensive Effect and Tolerability of Perindopril in Indian Hypertensive and Type 2 Diabetic Patients: 1-Year Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel Study vs Atenolol

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the antihypertensive effect and acceptability of a perindopril-based group with that of an atenolol-based group in Indian hypertensive type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: 100 ambulant patients aged between 35 and 69 years were recruited into this monocentric, randomised, double-blind study in two parallel groups for 1 year after a 1-month washout period on placebo. The setting was a tertiary care institution. PATIENTS: All patients had stable, essential hypertension between 95mm Hg and 115mm Hg, type 2 diabetes with glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1C)) <12%, and albuminuria between 300mg and 3.5g/24 hours. There were 50 patients per treatment group and two patient population groups were studied, intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP). The former constituted all patients, whilst the latter included those without major protocol deviation and who completed the 12-month study. INTERVENTIONS: The study drugs were perindopril 4 to 8mg once daily or atenolol 50 to 100mg once daily. In each group therapeutic adjustment was planned by doubling the dose and then by the addition of hydrochlorothiazide 25mg daily. Nifedipine 30 to 60mg daily was subsequently added if the desired drop in blood pressure was not obtained. The ITT group was analysed by Student's t-test, and a 2-way analysis of variance was performed for the PP population. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A comparison of the control of hypertension, biochemical abnormalities, blood sugar and adverse effects was performed in the atenolol group versus the perindopril group. RESULTS: On single-dose therapy after 1 month 17 patients (60%) had normal blood pressure [diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 相似文献   

氯沙坦/氢氯噻嗪治疗老年高血压病患者疗效观察

目的观察氯沙坦/氢氯噻嗪复方制剂治疗老年高血压病患者的疗效。方法选择113例老年原发性高血压病患者,给予氯沙坦50mg/氢氯噻嗪12.5mg复方片剂每日1次治疗,治疗期8周。结果治疗8周后,患者收缩压和舒张压较治疗前均降低(均P<0.01),降压总有效率达92.6%。结论氯沙坦/氢氯噻嗪复方制剂能有效降低收缩压和舒张压,且有服药更方便、依从性更好等优点。