Percentage Changes in Serum Pepsinogens Are Useful as Indices of Eradication of Helicobacter pylori

Objective: Eradication of Helicobacter pylori has been significance for the treatment of gastroduodenal diseases. Establishment of a precise diagnostic method for H. pylori is of great value. The aim of this study was to establish a new method for precisely judging the eradication of this bacteria. Methods: We measured serum pepsinogen I (PG I) and pepsinogen II (PG II) levels in 105 cases of peptic ulcer with H. pylori infection before and after anti- H. pylori treatment, determined percentage changes in serum PG EPG II ratios before and 1 month after the treatment, and established cut-off values for them to distinguish success from failure of H. pylori eradication. Cut-off values for percentage changes in serum PG EPG II ratios were tentatively set as +40%+ 25% and +10% when the serum PG EPG II ratios before treatment Were less than 3.0, not less than 3.0 but less than 5.0, and not less than 5.0, respectively. Results: With these cut-off values, the sensitivity, specificity, and validity for determination of eradication of H. pylori —on the basis of culture, histology, the rapid urease test, and a polymerase chain reaction method—were 100.0%, 93.1%, and 96.2%, respectively. These cut-off values could be applied to both gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that percentage changes in serum PG EPG II ratios are useful as indices for distinguishing success from failure in eradication therapy for H. pylori.     

Relationship between pepsinogen I/II ratio and age or upper gastrointestinal diseases in Helicobacter pylori-positive and -negative subjects]

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although previous reports suggested that pepsinogen (PG) I/II ratio was the index of gastric atrophy, PG I/II ratio was also related to other factors such as Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, various gastrointestinal diseases, and aging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between serum PG I/II ratio and age or upper gastro-intestinal diseases according to H. pylori infection status. METHODS: A total of 529 individuals (307 male; mean age, 57.2 years) were divided into 4 groups (94 gastric ulcers, 35 duodenal ulcers, 105 reflux esophagitis, and 295 atrophic gastritis) according to endoscopic diagnosis. H. pylori infection was determined by H. pylori IgG antibody (ELISA) and PG was measured by latex immunoassay. RESULTS: H. pylori infected patients showed markedly increased serum PG II levels (24.0+/-14.7 ng/mL vs. 13.8+/-16.6 ng/mL, p0.001) and low PG I/II ratio (3.9+/-2.0 vs. 6.0+/-2.5, p0.001) than non-infected subjects. In H. pylori infected patients, mean PG I/II ratios in the gastric ulcer and atrophic gastritis group were significantly lower than those of the duodenal ulcer and reflux esophagitis group (p0.001, ANOVA, Turkey's multiples comparison test). The mean ratio of open type atrophic gastritis was lower than that of close type atrophic gastritis (3.0+/-1.4 vs. 3.8+/-1.7, p0.005). PG I/II ratio gradually decreased with age in H. pylori-infected patients with atrophic gastritis (R(2)=0.9, p=0.005, linear regression analysis). CONCLUSION: Serum PG I/II ratio reflects H. pylori infection and gastric atrophy. In the presence of H. pylori infection, gastric atrophy progresses with age.     

Gastric metaplasia and Helicobacter pylori infection.

Duodenal and antral mucosal biopsy specimens were obtained from 139 patients with dyspeptic complaints to study the prevalence and extent of gastric metaplasia in the duodenal bulb in relation to Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) infection and duodenal ulcer disease. On logistic regression, the presence and extent of gastric metaplasia was not significantly associated with H pylori infection. The prevalence of gastric metaplasia, however, was found to be higher in patients with current or past evidence of duodenal ulcer disease in comparison with subjects with functional dyspepsia (p = 0.01). A follow up study on 22 patients before and at least one year after eradication of H pylori showed that the mean extent of gastric metaplasia did not change significantly after eradication and did not differ when compared with 21 patients with persisting infection. It is concluded that the unchanged gastric acid output after eradication of H pylori is a more important factor in the development of gastric metaplasia than the H pylori related inflammatory process.     

Changes in gastric acid secretion assayed by endoscopic gastrin test before and after Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND: It remains controversial whether or not Helicobacter pylori infection causes altered gastric acid secretion. A novel test for evaluating gastric acid secretion (endoscopic gastrin test; EGT) has recently been developed. AIM: To investigate by EGT the effects of H pylori eradication on the state of gastric acid secretion in patients with peptic ulcer. METHODS: Twenty six patients with duodenal ulcer and 33 with gastric ulcer, for all of whom H pylori infection had been documented, were studied by EGT, histological examination of gastric mucosa, and measurement of plasma gastrin levels before and one and seven months after H pylori eradication. RESULTS: In patients with duodenal ulcer, the mean EGT value before H pylori eradication was higher than that in H pylori negative controls, but it had decreased significantly seven months after the treatment. In contrast, the mean EGT value of patients with gastric ulcer before H pylori eradication was lower than that in H pylori negative controls, but it had increased one month after the treatment; this was followed by a slight decrease at seven months. In both groups, mean EGT values seven months after the treatment were not significantly different from the mean control value. CONCLUSIONS: The reduced acid secretion in gastric ulcer patients and gastric acid hypersecretion in duodenal ulcer patients were both normalised after the clearance of H pylori.     

Impact of Colloidal Bismuth Subcitrate in the Eradication Rates of Helicobacter pylori Infection-Associated Duodenal Ulcer Using a Short Treatment Regimen with Omeprazole and Clarithromycin: A Randomized Study

Recent trials have shown that duodenal ulcers treated by H2-blockers heal faster if Helicobacter pylori is eradicated concurrently. Objectives : To evaluate the efficacy of a short treatment regimen in H. pylori eradication and ulcer healing and to assess the impact of colloidal bismuth suhnitrate (CBS) in H. pylori eradication rate. Methods : Sixty-one patients with H. pylori -associated duodenal ulcer were randomized in two short treatment groups. Group A patients (31) were given omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. ± 8 days. Clarithromycin <500 mg, b.i.d. ) and CBS (120 mg, q.i.d. ) were added 24 h after starting omeprazole and were given for 7 days. Group B patients (30) were treated as group A patients but without CBS. Endoseopics were performed at entry and 4 wk after the end of treatment. Presence of H. pylori was assessed at each endoscopy by urease test, and biopsy specimens were examined for histological evidence of gastritis and by Gram stain and culture for H. pylori infection. No patient received follow-up treatment. Results: H. pylori eradication rates were achieved in 25/31 (80.6%) group A patients and in 15/30 (50%) in group B patients ( p = 0.012). Duodenal ulcer healing was documented in 30/31 (96.8%) patients in group A and in 25/30 (83%) patients in group B. Conclusions : The addition of CBS to the double therapy with omeprazole and Clarithromycin substantially improves the eradication rate of H. pylori . Short therapy with omeprazole 20 mg/b.i.d. , clarithro-mycin 500 mg/b,i.d. , and CBS 120 mg/q.i.d. is a safe, well tolerated combination that achieves a 80.6% eradication rate of H. pylori and duodenal ulcer healing rates as good as those achieved by omeprazole 20 mg/d when given for 4 wk.     

Long-term strict monitoring of plasma ghrelin and other serological markers of gastric diseases after Helicobacter pylori eradication

We report on a case of chronic atrophic gastritis in which the serological markers of gastric diseases were strictly monitored for 2 years after successful Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication. A 31-year-old man with upper abdominal pain was diagnosed as having H. pylori infection. Laboratory examination revealed low serum levels of pepsinogen (PG) I, low PG I/II ratio, and low plasma levels of ghrelin. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed severe corpus-dominant atrophic gastritis. H. pylori eradication therapy was performed. Successful eradication was confirmed three months later by the 13C urea breath test. Decreased serum PG II levels and an increased serum PG I/II ratio were detected a week after completion of the eradication therapy. The serum anti-H. pylori IgG titer decreased to less than 75% of the baseline level by 24 weeks after completion of the eradication therapy. On the other hand, the plasma levels of total and active ghrelin showed no marked changes after successful eradication therapy. This is the first report of long-term follow-up of changes of the plasma ghrelin levels after H. pylori eradication therapy, the observations suggesting that reduction of plasma ghrelin levels cannot be achieved merely by H. pylori eradication, without resolution of the gastric atrophy.     

Reflux esophagitis and hiatal hernia as concomitant abnormality in patients presenting with active duodenal or gastric ulcer: cross-sectional endoscopic study in consecutive patients

BACKGROUND: Follow-up studies have shown that patients with ulcer disease are at risk of developing reflux esophagitis (RE) after successful eradication of Heliobacter pylori. It is still not clear whether this is induced by eradication of H. pylori or whether RE is already present at the time the ulcer is diagnosed. A cross-sectional study was done in consecutive patients suffering from active ulcer disease in order to assess coincidental RE. METHODS: Patients with an active duodenal or gastric ulcer were included in the study. Concomitant RE and the presence of hiatal hernia (HH) were scored. Biopsy specimens were taken for detection of H. pylori. RESULTS: In 375 patients (77%), an active duodenal ulcer was the only abnormality. In 43 patients (8.8%), duodenal ulcer and concomitant RE were present and 69 patients (14.2%) had a duodenal ulcer with concomitant HH. Patients with a duodenal ulcer were significantly younger than patients with concomitant RE or HH. From 374 patients (76.8%) with a duodenal ulcer, biopsy specimens were available for the detection of H. pylori. The majority of duodenal ulcer patients were H. pylori-positive. H. pylori was significantly more often present in patients with an active duodenal ulcer than it was in duodenal ulcer patients suffering from concomitant RE (P=0.04). In 218 patients (76%), a gastric ulcer was the only abnormality. Fifteen patients (5.2%) also had RE and 54 patients (18.8%) had a concomitant HH. There was no difference in H. pylori status in these three groups of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Given the low prevalence of concomitant RE, it is concluded that this condition is likely to occur in a large percentage of patients suffering from H. pylori-positive ulcer disease after successful eradication therapy.     

A 1 year follow-up study of the consequences of Helicobacter pylori eradication in duodenal ulcer patients: unchanged frequency of erosive oesophagitis and decreased prevalence of non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Discussions concerning the increased incidence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) after Helicobacter pylori eradication continue. In this study we aimed to evaluate the presence of co-existing GORD in (1) duodenal ulcer patients after successful H. pylori eradication, (2) patients with persistent H. pylori infection after attempts at eradication, and (3) controls in whom H. pylori eradication had not been attempted. METHODS: A prospective study of 255 patients with duodenal ulcer who were assigned to H. pylori eradication or to control treatment (omeprazole for 4 weeks) and followed up for 1 year or until peptic ulcer relapse. GORD was determined in the patients who had reflux oesophagitis on endoscopy at the beginning of the study and/or in patients without reflux oesophagitis if they experienced heartburn and/or regurgitation at least twice a week associated with impairment of daily activities. RESULTS: The study revealed a significant decrease (from 44.6% to 21.7%; P < 0.001) of patients with GORD at the end of the follow-up among those in whom H. pylori eradication had been successful. There was no significant difference in the frequency of reflux oesophagitis before and after the follow-up regardless of H. pylori status. CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori eradication did not significantly influence the prevalence and incidence of reflux oesophagitis in patients with duodenal ulcer during a 1 year follow-up period, but there was a significantly lower prevalence of GORD after successful H. pylori eradication, as patients with non-erosive GORD had been cured.     

A four-year follow-up of duodenal ulcer patients after Helicobacter pylori eradication.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical course of disease in 63 duodenal ulcer (DU) patients during a 4-year follow-up after Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication. METHODOLOGY: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and a clinical interview were performed before antimicrobial therapy, 2 months after, yearly and when symptoms recurred. Two antral and two corporal specimens were taken for histology, and one additional specimen from antrum was taken for rapid urease test at the first endoscopy and for culture at the following endoscopies. All patients received triple antimicrobial regimens based on colloidal bismuth subcitrate, amoxycillin and metronidazole for at least 2 weeks. Patients with a negative histology and culture 2 months after antimicrobial therapy were included in the study. RESULTS: After H. pylori eradication, ulcer recurrence dropped from 84.1% per year in the year before H. pylori eradication to a mean value of 5.2% per year during 2076 patient months (p<0.01). The increased incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was found only in the first year of the follow-up period. The average percentage of anti-ulcer drug users per year was 30.8% because of GERD, reflux symptoms, ulcer recurrence or non-ulcer dyspepsia. Ulcers or acute erosions recurred in 9 H. pylori-negative patients; recurrences were attributable to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) in 4 out of 9 cases (44.4%). CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori eradication changed the long-term course of DU disease.     

Mucosal expression and luminal release of epidermal and transforming growth factors in patients with duodenal ulcer before and after eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor (EGF) and transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF alpha) are potent gastric acid inhibitors and stimuli of mucosal growth and protection but their involvement in Helicobacter pylori associated duodenal ulcer has been little examined. AIM: To assess gastric acid secretion, plasma gastrin concentrations, mucosal content of EGF and TGF alpha, and mucosal expression of these peptides and their receptor (EGFr) as well as salivary and gastric luminal release of EGF under basal conditions and after pentagastrin stimulation in 10 healthy subjects and in 25 H pylori positive patients with duodenal ulcer before and after two weeks of triple anti-H pylori therapy and four weeks after the termination of this therapy. RESULTS: Pentagastrin stimulation caused a significant increase in salivary and gastric release of EGF both in healthy controls and patients with duodenal ulcers but in the patients, the eradication of H pylori resulted in several fold higher gastric luminal (but not salivary) EGF release than before the anti-H pylori therapy. Mucosal contents of immunoreactive EGF and TGF alpha and mucosal expression of EGF, TGF alpha, and EGFr in H pylori positive patients with duodenal ulcer were significantly higher than those in healthy H pylori negative controls and this increase persisted after eradication of H pylori. Basal plasma gastrin was significantly reduced after two weeks of triple therapy and four weeks after the H pylori eradication all ulcers were completely healed. CONCLUSIONS: (1) H pylori infection in patients with duodenal ulcer was accompanied by enhanced plasma gastrin and increased mucosal content and expression of TGF alpha, EGF, and EGFr; (2) H pylori eradication resulted in ulcer healing, reduction in plasma gastrin, and enhancement of gastric (but not salivary) luminal release of EGF, particularly after pentagastrin stimulation; and (3) enhanced mucosal content and expression of TGF alpha, EGF, and EGFr and increased luminal release of EGF may contribute to ulcer healing after eradication of H pylori.     

Prevalence of non-Helicobacter pylori duodenal ulcer in Karachi, Pakistan

AIM:To determine the prevalence of non-Helicobacter pylori (H pylori)-related duodenal ulcer in patients with acid-peptic diseases. METHODS: Medical records of patients who attended the Gastroenterology Department at Aga Khan University Hospital from 1999 to 2001 and had endoscopic diagnosis of duodenal ulcers were reviewed. Duodenal ulcer associated with H pylori was diagnosed on the basis of endoscopy, rapid urease test and histopathology whereas histories of aspirin or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) related duodenal ulcers. Non-H pylori, non-NSAID duodenal ulcers were those without H pylori infection and history of NSAID intake. Co-morbid conditions associated were noted. RESULTS: Of 2 260 patients, 10% (217/2 260) had duodenal ulcer. Duodenal ulcer related to H pylori infection accounted for 53% (116/217), NSAID-related 10% (22/217), non-H pylori non-NSAID 29% (62/217), and 8% (17/217) had both H pylori infection and histories of NSAID intake. Fifteen percent (18/116)_patients had past histories of peptic ulcer disease in H pylori infection, while 8% (5/62) in non-H pylori non-NSAID ulcer. Co-morbid conditions in H pylori infection were seen in 23% (27/116) and 34% (21/62) in non-H pylori non-NSAID ulcer. CONCLUSION: Incidence of H pylori infection related with duodenai ulcer is common. In the presence of co-morbids, non-H pylori and non-NSAID duodenal ulcer is likely to be present.     

Histamine Content of the Oxyntic Mucosa from Duodenal Ulcer Patients: Effect of Helicobacter pylori Eradication

The histamine concentration of the oxyntic mucosa was determined in Helicobacter pylori -positive patients with duodenal ulcer before and after antimicrobial therapy and in H. pylori -negative subjects. Determination of serum gastrin was also performed in duodenal ulcer patients before and after H. pylori eradication. The histamine content of the oxyntic mucosa was lower in patients with duodenal ulcer than in H. pylori -negative subjects, but it increased after H. pylori eradication. Conversely, in patients in whom therapy failed to eradicate the microorganism, the histamine content remained unchanged. Serum gastrin levels fell after microorganism eradication, and the percentage of this fall was correlated with the percentage of increase in gastric histamine. In conclusion, our findings suggest that abnormalities of histamine store present in duodenal ulcer patients might be a feature of H. pylori infection.     

Does treatment of Helicobacter pylori with antibiotics alone heal duodenal ulcer? A randomised double blind placebo controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection prevents duodenal ulcer relapse. It has not been established if treatment of the infection heals duodenal ulcer. AIM: To test the hypothesis that treatment of the infection was associated with healing of duodenal ulcer. METHODS: A randomised, double blind placebo controlled trial was performed to study the efficacy of an antibiotic only regimen consisting of 300 mg metronidazole, 500 mg amoxycillin, and 250 mg clarithromycin, each given four times daily for two weeks, in the healing of duodenal ulcer as assessed by endoscopy. Symptoms were controlled with acetaminophen and antacids. RESULTS: Of 100 consecutive patients with endoscopically established duodenal ulcer, 97 with positive rapid urease test on antral biopsy specimens were admitted into the study and 81 completed the trial. Of these, 40 were randomised to receive antibiotics and 41 to receive placebo. Treatment with antibiotics resulted in 92.5% (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 84.3-100) healing at four weeks and 100% at eight and 12 weeks; the corresponding healing rates for placebo treatment were respectively, 36.6%, 61%, and 63.4% (95% CIs 21.8-51.3, 46.0-75.9, and 48.7-78.2 respectively). The differences between the two treatment groups were significant at p < 0.001 at each time point and by life table analysis. Clearance of H pylori as assessed by urease test on antral biopsy specimens at four weeks and eradication of the organism as determined by 13C-urea breath test at eight weeks were achieved in 85% and 62.5% of patients respectively. Duodenal ulcer healed at four weeks in 87.2% and 86.2% (95% CIs 76.7-97.7 and 73.7-98.8) of patients in whom H pylori clearance or eradication, was achieved, versus 42.9% and 51.9% (95% CIs 27.9-57.8 and 38.3-65.5; p < 0.001 and < 0.003 respectively) in whom these processes failed. Stepwise discriminant analysis on 32 clinical, personal, and endoscopic characteristics as well as H pylori clearance and eradication identified H pylori clearance as the most discriminative variable for the healing of duodenal ulcer at four weeks, followed by ulcer depth and eradication of the organism. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with an antibiotic only regimen was effective for the healing of duodenal ulcer, and clearance as well as eradication of H pylori contributed significantly to the healing. The results constituted the strongest evidence to date that H pylori infection was aetiologically related to duodenal ulceration, and support the concept of treating duodenal ulcer associated with H pylori as an infection and relieving its symptoms with acid reducing agents such as antacids.     

Regression of duodenal gastric metaplasia in Helicobacter pylori positive patients with duodenal ulcer disease.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether the extent of duodenal gastric metaplasia is due to Helicobacter pylori and/or acid. AIMS: To investigate the role of Helicobacter pylori eradication in the regression of duodenal gastric metaplasia in patients with duodenal ulcer maintained in acid suppression conditions. METHODS:. Duodenal (anterior, superior inferior walls of first part of duodenum) and gastric antrum biopsies were obtained from 44 Helicobacter pylori positive duodenal ulcer patients. Helicobacter pylori infection was diagnosed by rapid urease test, histology and 13C-Urea Breath Test. Patients were treated with 20 mg omeprazole tid associated with 250 mg clarithromycin and 500 mg amoxycillin four times daily for 10 days and maintained with 20 mg omeprazole daily for 18 weeks. Control endoscopies were performed at 6 and 18 weeks after beginning treatment. RESULTS: Duodenal gastric metaplasia regression was observed in all (32/32) patients in whom Helicobacter pylori was eradicated, but in only 3 out of 6 patients in whom eradication was not achieved (p<0. 001). CONCLUSIONS:. The present results suggest that Helicobacter pylori eradication associated with prolonged acid suppression may represent a good therapeutic strategy to achieve duodenal gastric metaplasia regression and highlight the combined role of acid and Helicobacter pylori in the pathogenesis of duodenal gastric metaplasia.     

Acid suppression therapy is not required after one-week anti-Helicobacter pylori triple therapy for duodenal ulcer healing

AIM: To compare healing of Helicobacter pylori-related non complicated duodenal ulcer after one-week eradication triple therapy alone and after triple therapy with further 3-weeks antisecretory treatment with ranitidine. METHODS: Three hundred and forty three patients with symptomatic H. pylori positive duodenal ulcer were included in this randomized double-blind placebo controlled study. H. pylori infection was established by rapid urease test and histopathology of antral biopsies. All patients were treated for one week with ranitidine 300 mg b.i.d., amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d., and then randomly treated for the following 3 weeks either with ranitidine 300 mg once daily (triple therapy + ranitidine, n =180) or placebo (triple therapy alone, n =163). Ulcer healing was assessed by endoscopy 4 weeks after inclusion. H. pylori eradication was established by (13) C-urea breath testing 5 weeks after the end of triple therapy. RESULTS: In intention to treat, duodenal ulcer healed at 4 weeks in 86 % of patients treated with triple therapy + ranitidine and in 83 % of patients treated with triple therapy alone (equivalence: 90 % CI [-3. 8 %; 9.2 %]). The H. pylori eradication rates were 67 % and 69 % respectively. Ulcer healed in 88 % of patients in whom H. pylori eradication was achieved and in 77 % of patients in whom eradication failed. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that one-week triple therapy alone is highly effective in healing non complicated H. pylori associated duodenal ulcer without additional antisecretory treatment.     

Triple therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori and reduction of duodenal ulcer relapse: Comparison of 1 week and 2 week regimens and recrudescence rates over 12 months

Abstract The aim of this study is to assess the relationship between Helicobacter pylori and the relapse of duodenal ulcer, and also to evaluate the differences in efficacy and side effects between 1 week and 2 week triple therapy. Sixty-two patients with active duodenal ulcer, which healed within 8 weeks of nizatidine treatment, were randomly allocated to one of two groups. Group 1 ( n = 29) received no drugs, Group II ( n = 33) received triple threapy for 1 week (IIa, n = 16) or 2 weeks (IIb, n = 17). Eleven patients whose ulcer did not heal after an 8 week nizatidine treatment period were randomly assigned into Group IIa ( n = 5) and IIb ( n = 6). Seven patients whose ulcer recurred after discontinuation of nizatidine were allocated to receive 2 weeks of triple therapy. All patients received endoscopy 6 weeks after entry, and again at 3, 6 and 12 months unless both ulcer recurrence and H. pylori infection were found. The frequency of ulcer relapse 6 weeks after the active duodenal ulcer had healed was 83% (24/29) in Group I, 13% in Group IIa and 14% in Group IIb. The cumulative rate of recurrence was significantly higher in Group I than in Group II (90 vs 30% at 12 months, P < 0.01). Ulcer relapse was associated with persistence of H. pylori infection ( P < 0.0001). No statistical difference was found between the 1 week and 2 week regimens in ulcer relapse rate (30 vs 30% in 1 year), H. pylori eradication rate (86 vs 100%), incidence of side effects (48 vs 53%) or recrudescence rate (17 vs 23%). Our study suggests that a 1 week regimen and a 2 week regimen are equally effective in the eradication of H. pylori and reduction of ulcer recurrence in 1 year.     

Recrudescence of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Patients with Healed Duodenal Ulcer after Treatment with Different Regimens

Objective: To determine the 12-month posttherapy recurrence (recrudescence) of Helicobacter pylori in patients with healed duodenal ulcer after apparent eradication of the organism with anti- H. pylori treatment. The influence of original anti- H. pylori treatment regimens on the recrudescence was also evaluated. Methods: One hundred and ninety patients who had duodenal ulcer healed and H. pylori eradicated (as assessed by four routine techniques 4 wk after the end of anti- H. pylori therapy) with one of five regimens were studied. The five regimens were: 1) colloidal bismuth suhcitrate (CBS) 120 mg; 2) CBS plus amoxicillin (500 nig); 3) CBS plus mctronidazole (400 mg); 4) CBS plus metronidazole and amoxicillin; and 5) CBS plus metronidazole and tetracycline (500 mg). CBS was taken four times daily for 4 wk, and antihiotics were taken three times daily for the first week. The patients were re-endoscoped. and the status of H. pylori , duodenal ulcer, and gastritis was assessed after a period of follow-up (mean 14 months after commencement of treatment). Results: H. pylori infection recurred in 36 (18.9%) of these patients. Recrudescence rate with monotherapy was 47.1%, with dual therapy 29.2–35% and with tripie therapy 9.2–14.3%. Nineteen (52.7%) of the 36 patients with recrudescent infection had ulcer relapse, and the rate for H, pylori -negative patients was 3.2% (5/154). Conclusion: Recrudeseence of H. pylori infection after apparent eradication can occur, but it could be that the treatment was only suppressing the organism. The definition of eradication of H. pylori infection may need to he revised, and more sensitive techniques to assess eradication of H. pylori are required.     

A comparative study on Helicobacter pylori infection in peptic ulcer disease patients with or without previous eradication therapy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although H. pyloric eradication therapy is indicated for peptic ulcer patients, the prevalence of H. pylori infection may be different between patients with active or chronic (scarred) peptic ulcers. This study aimed to compare the prevalence of H. pylori infection in active and chronic peptic ulcer patients with or without previous H. pyloric eradication therapy. METHODOLOGY: Both non-invasive (13C or 14C urea breath test) and invasive methods (rapid urease test and histology) were used to detect H. pylori. From Dec. 2002 to Jan. 2003, 153 patients with 63% male were enrolled in this study. Fifty-six patients who previously received H. pyloric eradication therapy were enrolled as treated patients, and 97 patients who did not receive therapy were enrolled as untreated patients. RESULTS: H. pylori infection rate was still high in untreated patients even when duodenal ulcer had been scarred (96% in active duodenal ulcer and 63% in scarred duodenal ulcer). In treated patients, H. pyloric infected rates were very low when peptic ulcers were scarred (0% in scarred gastric ulcer, 4% in scarred duodenal ulcer and 0% in both scarred ulcers). CONCLUSIONS: H. pyloric eradication therapy is indicated for untreated patients even when endoscopic examination revealed chronic scarred duodenal ulcer.     

Basal and stimulated gastrin and pepsinogen levels after eradication of Helicobacter pylori: a 1-year follow-up study

AIM: A decrease in gastrin and pepsinogen (PG) levels 1 month after Helicobacter pylori eradication has been described repeatedly, but the long-term progression of such a decrease has been scarcely studied. We therefore studied the effect of H. pylori eradication on basal and stimulated gastrin and PG levels for 1 year. Initially, the usefulness of measuring these parameters for the noninvasive diagnosis of H. pylori eradication was validated. Furthermore, an assessment was made of the association between H. pylori reinfection and a re-increase in gastrin and PG values. Finally, an evaluation was made of the variables influencing gastrin and PG concentration, with particular attention to H. pylori infection and histological lesions of gastric mucosa. METHODS: Two-hundred and twenty-two patients with duodenal ulcer were studied prospectively. Exclusion criteria were the administration of antibiotics, H2 antagonists, omeprazole or bismuth prior to endoscopy. In all patients serum basal levels of gastrin, PGI, and PGII were measured before and 1 month after completing eradication therapy. In the successfully eradicated patients, gastrin, PGI, and PGII were also measured at 6 and 12 months. In 80 patients stimulated measurements of gastrin (after ingestion of two beef cubes) and PGI (after injection of pentagastrin) were also performed. H. pylori-negative patients after therapy underwent a urea breath test at 6 and 12 months, and patients who had stimulated gastrin and PG concentration measured had also an endoscopy performed at 6 months. RESULTS: H. pylori was eradicated in 73% of patients. A histological improvement was observed 1 month after completing H. pylori eradication therapy, both at gastric antrum and body (P < 0.001), while a further improvement at antrum was demonstrated at 6 months (P < 0.01). With regard to the different cut-off points for decreased basal and stimulated measurements for diagnosing H. pylori eradication, the best results were obtained, respectively, with PGII (sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 76%) and PGI 30 min after stimulation (sensitivity and specificity of 82%), with an area under the ROC curve of 0.87 in both cases. In the multiple regressions analysis H. pylori status correlated with gastrin, PGI and PGII after therapy (P < 0.001), while histological lesions correlated only with gastrin levels (P < 0.05). A decrease in basal and stimulated serum parameters was demonstrated immediately after eradication (Wilcoxon test, P < 0.001), and an additional decrease (at 6 months) was observed just in PGI (Friedman test, P < 0.01). However, gastrin and PGII values remained unchanged after the first month post-eradication. Seven patients were reinfected with H. pylori during follow-up. Quantitation of basal and stimulated gastrin and PGI levels was not reliable as a reinfection marker. Regarding basal PGII, the parallelism was strong at 6 months (re-increase in all four reinfected patients), although only in one out of three with reinfection at 1 year did PGII rise at that stage. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Measurement of gastrin and PG levels (especially basal PGII values) is a useful non-invasive method to confirm H. pylori eradication after therapy. (2) H. pylori eradication is associated with a significant decrease in basal and stimulated gastrin levels and in basal PGII levels that is detected immediately (1 month) after finishing treatment, and remains unchanged for 1 year. However, the decrease in basal and stimulated PGI levels occurs progressively for 6 months, although such levels remain also unchanged afterwards. (3) Measurement of gastrin and PGI concentrations has a limited usefulness in the diagnosis of H. pylori reinfections after successful eradication, although PGII determination could be more useful in this situation.     

Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on gastroesophageal function

BACKGROUND: To elucidate the cause of possible occurrence of reflux esophagitis after Helicobacter pylori eradication, gastric and esophageal function among H. pylori infected Japanese patients were evaluated both before and after eradication therapy. METHODS: Nine H. pylori-positive patients were studied before and 6 months after successful H. pylori eradication. Studies included gastric emptying, esophageal manometry, gastric and esophageal pH monitoring as well as measuring serum levels of gastrin, pepsinogen I and pepsinogen II. RESULTS: Helicobacter pylori eradication was associated with a significant change in serum gastrin and pepsinogen levels, consistent with the improvement in mucosal inflammation. There was no significant change in gastric emptying, fasting or postprandial lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, esophageal primary peristaltic contractions, frequency of transient LES relaxation, or gastroesophageal reflux, as assessed by 24 h pH monitoring. The percent time of the gastric pH>4 at night decreased significantly. A 41-year-old male developed erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (Los Angeles Classification Grade A) after eradication. Physiological studies showed he had abnormal esophageal motility prior to H. pylori eradication. CONCLUSIONS: With the exception of gastric pH at night, most patients did not experience a significant change in gastric or esophageal function after H. pylori eradication. Development of GERD post H. pylori eradication likely reflects an increase in the acidity of the refluxate superimposed on pre-existing abnormalities in gastroesophageal motility.