Diagnosis of migraine in children attending a pediatric headache clinic

The International Headache Society (IHS) criteria for migraine are not sufficient to diagnose migraine in children. Specifically, the duration and localization of the headache are different in children and adults with migraine. This study compared the formal IHS criteria with pediatric-amended IHS criteria and IHS criteria with the duration factor removed in children younger than 18 years. In addition, the older criteria by Vahlquist and by Prensky and Sommer were also compared. Finally, clinical diagnosis of migraine was compared with IHS criteria with the duration factor removed. The study showed that many children with a shorter duration headache have migraine and also that a number of children with a very long duration of headaches still fit the diagnosis of migraine. Unilateral headache is quite uncommon. The majority of children with migraine complained of bilateral headaches. It is concluded that the IHS criteria for pediatric migraine should be revised. We suggest making the duration factor a minor criteria for migraine in children or to exclude headaches lasting longer than 72 hours only in children younger than 15 years.     

American Headache Society members' assessment of headache diagnostic criteria

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the views of physicians interested in headache as to the diagnosis of the most commonly occurring and currently controversial headaches. BACKGROUND: The International Headache Society (IHS) classification system has received wide professional endorsement and considerable empirical support, but in the United States, their adoption by clinicians may be proceeding more slowly. Questions remain, including what diagnostic criteria for migraine and tension-type headache clinicians may continue to favor over those outlined by the IHS, to what extent is the "transformed migraine" diagnosis used in clinical practice, and how is analgesic rebound headache diagnosed with regard to the various quantitative measures of analgesic use. METHODS: Members of the American Headache Society rated the importance of IHS and non-IHS diagnostic criteria for migraine and tension-type headache and for analgesic rebound headache. Respondents also described their use of the proposed transformed migraine diagnosis. RESULTS: Two-thirds (67.3%) of the respondents reported use of the IHS criteria or the IHS criteria in conjunction with clinical judgment. For migraine and tension-type headache, IHS criteria were rated with high importance, but some respondents reported using additional non-IHS diagnostic criteria and de-emphasizing certain IHS criteria. For chronic headache, almost two-thirds (63%) of respondents reported using the transformed migraine diagnosis. For analgesic rebound headache, respondents preferred to make the diagnosis based on medication consumption that is lower than amounts stipulated in the IHS classification system. CONCLUSIONS: There remains a number of physicians interested in headache who do not use the IHS classification system, who modify the IHS criteria in practice, and who use the "transformed migraine" diagnosis for patients with chronic daily headache.     

Diagnosis of migraine: empirical analysis of a large clinical sample of atypical migraine (IHS 1.7) patients and proposed revision of the IHS criteria

The International Headache Society (IHS) diagnostic criteria for headache improved the accuracy of primary headache diagnoses, including migraine. However, many migraineurs receive an 'atypical migraine' diagnosis according to the IHS nosology (IHS 1.7), indicating that they approximate but do not fully meet all IHS criteria. This study characterized and sub-classified patients with atypical migraine. Within a clinical sample of 382 headache sufferers, 83 patients met IHS criteria for 'atypical migraine'. Patients receiving the IHS 1.7 designation did not converge to form a homogeneous group. Rather, distinct and clinically relevant subgroups were empirically derived (e.g. migraine with atypical pain parameters, brief migraine, chronic migraine). The results call for revisions of the IHS diagnostic criteria for migraine that would minimize the number of patients receiving an atypical diagnosis. Revisions would include decreasing the minimum headache duration criteria from 4 h to 2 h, and developing a classification for 'chronic migraine' for migraine greater than 15 days per month. The proposed revision provides a means of diagnosing the daily and near-daily headache commonly observed in clinical populations.     

From hemicrania lunaris to hemicrania continua: an overview of the revised International Classification of Headache Disorders

The International Headache Society's (IHS) Classification of Headache Disorders, published in 1988, is largely responsible for stimulating the rapid scientific and therapeutic advances that have revolutionized the field of headache. By establishing consistent operational diagnostic criteria for primary and secondary headache disorders, the IHS Classification has facilitated epidemiological and genetic studies as well as the multinational clinical trials that provide the basis for our present treatment guidelines. Fifteen years after its original release, a revised 2nd edition has been unveiled. Modifications are small but significant. We hope to introduce clinicians to the salient changes in the 2nd edition by highlighting the newly included headache types, acknowledging the renamed headache types, and reviewing the modifications in diagnostic criteria for existing headache types. Physicians involved in the care of headache patients need to be aware of these changes and should continue to consult the IHS criteria to ensure accurate diagnosis, to continue to refine the diagnostic criteria, and to contribute to the body of knowledge necessary to make further advances in the classification as well as in the field of headache.     

Chronic daily headache: correlation between the 2004 and the 1988 International Headache Society diagnostic criteria

BACKGROUND: In a previous study, we compared the 1988 International Headache Society (IHS) criteria and the Silberstein-Lipton criteria (S-L) in a subspeciality clinic sample of 638 patients with chronic daily headache (CDH) assessed both clinically and with headache diaries. Both systems allowed for the classification of most patients with CDH. The 1988 IHS classification required multiple diagnoses and was more complex to apply. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to revisit the same database, now comparing the prior classification systems with the new 2004 IHS classification. In contrast with the 1st edition, the 2nd edition includes criteria for chronic migraine (CM), new daily persistent headache (NDPH), and hemicrania continua (HC). METHODS: We reviewed the clinical records and the headache diaries of 638 patients seen between 1980 and 2001 at a headache center. All patients had primary CDH according to the S-L criteria. RESULTS: Using the S-L criteria as a reference, of the 158 patients with transformed migraine (TM) without medication overuse, just 9 (5.6%) met 2004 IHS criteria for CM. Most of the subjects were classified using combinations of migraine and CTTH diagnoses, much like the 1988 IHS classification. Similarly, using the new IHS system, just 41/399 (10.2%) subjects with TM with medication overuse were classified as probable CM with probable medication overuse. Most patients with NDPH without overuse were easily classified using the 2004 criteria (95.8%). Regarding NDPH with medication overuse, the diagnostic groups were much like results for the 1st edition. All patients with chronic tension-type headache (CTTH) and hemicrania continua (HC) according to the S-L system were easily classified using the 2004 IHS criteria. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the 2004 IHS criteria facilitate the classification of NDPH without medication overuse and HC. For subjects with TM according to the S-L system, the new IHS criteria are complex to use and require multiple diagnoses. Very few patients with TM in the S-L system could be classified with a single diagnosis in the 2004 IHS classification. In fact, CM was so rare that it would be virtually impossible to conduct clinical trials of this entity using the 2004 IHS criteria. Clinical trials of this entity should therefore be conducted using the S-L criteria. Finally, we propose that in the 3rd edition of the IHS classification, the diagnosis of NDPH be revised so as not to exclude migraine features.     

Migrainous disorder and headache of the tension-type not fulfilling the criteria: a follow-up study in children and adolescents

In this follow-up study in children and adolescents with recurrent headaches classified as migrainous disorder (IHS 1.7) and headache of the tension-type not fulfilling the criteria (IHS 2.3), 28.6% were headache-free and 71.4% still had headaches 2-5 years after the first examination. The majority remained in the same one-digit IHS diagnosis, whereas 20% changed from migraine to tension-type headache or vice versa. The number of IHS criteria fulfilled increased significantly from the first to the second examination. The reason for diagnosing IHS 1.7 and IHS 2.3 most often was a short headache duration or headache characteristics not meeting the criteria. By reducing the minimum headache duration to 1 h, 11 of 58 patients could be diagnosed as migraine without aura. There was a remarkable overlap in the diagnostic criteria for migraine without aura and tension-type headache. In IHS 1.7 and IHS 2.3 this overlap exceeded 80%, with a trend to decrease at the second examination.     

Diagnosis of headache in childhood and adolescence: a study in 437 patients

We investigated whether the criteria for idiopathic headache published by the International Headache Society (IHS) are useful in childhood and adolescence and compared the diagnoses according to this classification with those of Vahlquist. We used a semi-structured questionnaire to examine a total of 437 children and adolescents referred consecutively to a headache outpatient clinic. Twenty-eight of 437 patients were excluded because of symptomatic or unclassifiable headache. Of 409 patients with idiopathic headache, 70.4% had definite migraine or tension-type headache (IHS 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.2), 20.5% had a migrainous disorder (IHS 1.7) and 9.1% had headache of the tension-type not fulfilling the criteria (IHS 2.3). In the differential diagnosis of migraine and tension-type headache the intensity of pain, aggravation of headache by physical activity, nausea and vomiting were the most important features. The quality of pain, photo- and phonophobia were less helpful and location least important. The duration of migraine attacks was less than 2 h in 19.0% of the migraine patients. In general, the diagnostic criteria of migraine were highly specific but less sensitive, and those of tension-type headache highly sensitive but less specific. The agreement between IHS criteria and those of Vahlquist was marked (kappa = 0.57). We conclude that the IHS criteria are useful for classifying headache in children and adolescents referred to a headache outpatient clinic. A forthcoming modification of the IHS criteria should consider a reduction of the minimum duration of migraine attacks from 2 h to I h and should try to increase the sensitivity of the criteria for migraine and the specificity of the criteria for tension-type headache.     

Application of the 1988 International Headache Society diagnostic criteria in nine Italian headache centers using a computerized structured record

BACKGROUND: The actual application of the current International Headache Society (IHS) diagnostic criteria in clinical practice has not been investigated thoroughly. OBJECTIVES: To develop a computerized, structured, medical record based exclusively on the IHS classification system. DESIGN AND METHOD: We tested the computerized structured record by entering and analyzing data reported on the case sheets of 500 consecutive patients attending nine headache centers in Italy. All clinical diagnoses in the study were made according to current IHS criteria. The rate of concordance between the diagnosis provided by the computerized structured record and that reported by clinicians on the case sheets was calculated, and reasons for any discrepancies between the two diagnoses were analyzed. RESULTS: Concordance between the two diagnoses was found in 345 of 500 cases examined (69%). In the remaining 155 cases, diagnoses reached with the computerized structured record and case sheets were impossible or discordant with respect to the diagnoses made by the clinician. In 144 of these cases (28.8%), this was due to missing information or errors in the diagnosis recorded by the clinicians on the patient case sheet. In particular, the diagnosis could not be reached using the computerized structured record in 105 cases (20.6%) because of a lack of one or more data needed in formulating a correct diagnosis according to the IHS operational criteria for one of the primary headache disorders. In the remaining 41 cases some data were missing, but the data available were sufficient to reach a diagnosis according to the IHS criteria. Moreover, the diagnoses reached using the computerized structured record were not in agreement with those made by the clinicians in another 39 cases (7.9%) due to an incorrect interpretation by the clinicians of the data reported on the patients' case sheets. In only 2.2% of the cases (n = 11) misdiagnoses were due to errors of the program that were promptly corrected. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that incorrect application of IHS criteria for the diagnosis of primary headache may occur in as many as one third of patients attending headache centers and that use of a computerized structured record based exclusively on current IHS criteria may overcome this deficiency.     

Presentation of a new instrument: the diagnostic headache diary

A new instrument, the Diagnostic Headache Diary, based on the operational diagnostic criteria of the International Headache Society (IHS), was tested in 61 migraine patients from a headache research clinic using the clinical diagnosis (IHS criteria) for comparison. All patients kept the diary for one to eight months. The clinical and diary diagnosis of migraine with and without aura was the same in, respectively, 72 and 87% of the patients. Nausea, photophobia and phonophobia tended to be more pronounced at the clinical interview. The diary identified 20 more cases of episodic tension-type headache and 15 fewer cases of chronic tension-type headache than the clinical interview. Two blinded observers always made the same IHS diagnoses when interpreting the diagnostic headache diary. A combination of a clinical interview and the diagnostic headache diary gives a qualitatively and quantitatively more precise diagnosis than a clinical interview alone.     

Effect of age on the fulfilment of the IHS criteria for migraine in children at a headache clinic

In a headache clinic, 247 children suffering from severe recurrent headaches were studied in relation to the IHS criteria for migraine. Of the 247, 163 had migrainous headache, with 110 (67.5%) of these having migraine in accordance with the IHS criteria. The remaining 53 (32.5%) had headache attacks fulfilling all but one of the IHS criteria. Coverage of the IHS criteria for migraine was 93%. Symptoms of unilateral headache, aggravation by physical activity, and nausea showed the greatest differences in frequency between those with migraine and those with probable migraine. All children with aura fulfilled criteria for migraine. Children with migraine with aura (11.8, 95% CI: 11.0–12.6 years) were older than those without aura (10.1, 9.4–10.8 years; p = 0.001). Children with pulsating headache were slightly older than children without pulsating headache. No differences in age were detected for the other IHS criteria.     

Responsiveness of non-IHS migraine and tension-type headache to sumatriptan

In a long-term efficacy and satiety study, 424 patients were treated with sumatriptan (6 mg sc) for 1,904 migraine attacks. The patients were diagnosed with migraine based on IHS criteria but individual migraine attacks treated in the study were physician diagnosed; not necessarily required to meet IHS criteria. A re-analysis of the treatment response to open label sumatriptan (6 mg sc) indicated that 43 patients had treated at least one migraine that fulfilled IHS criteria for tension-type headache. Analysis of this population revealed they treated 232 headaches. Of these headaches, 114 were classified per IHS criteria as migraine; 76 as tension-type; and 42 as. non-IHS migraine (not classifiable as IHS migraine or IHS tension-type headache). Of the 114 migraines a positive response to sumatriptan occurred in 109 (96%) cases; of the 76 tension-types, 73 responded to sumatriptan (97%); of the 42 non-IHS migraine, 40 (95%) responded to sumatriptan. An equivalent response to sumatriptan among three diagnostic groups of headache supports the concept of a common biologic mechanism involving 5HT₁ receptors that spans a range of clinical presentations.     

Assessment of International Headache Society diagnostic criteria: a reliability study

In 1988 the International Headache Society (IHS) introduced new diagnostic criteria for headaches and craniofacial pain. Since headaches can be diagnosed solely on the basis of information provided by the patient, it is essential that the criteria are reproducible and consistent. Two neurologists evaluated the clinical records of 100 consecutive outpatients and transferred the data on headache and associated phenomena to a form designed to reflect the IHS criteria. Interobserver concordance (kappa statistics) in the application of the diagnostic criteria of primary headaches was: (i) "perfect" to "substantial" for the first IHS digit, being kappa = 1.0 for cluster headache and paroxysmal hemicrania; kappa = 0.88 for migraine; kappa = 0.75 for tension-type headache; (ii) "almost perfect" to "substantial" for the second digit (kappa = 0.94 for cluster headache; kappa = 0.90 for migraine with aura; kappa = 0.81 for episodic tension-type headache; kappa = 0.78 for migraine without aura; kappa = 0.71 for chronic tension-type headache; kappa = 0.66 for cluster headache-like disorder not fulfilling the criteria; (iii) "moderate" for migrainous disorder (kappa = 0.48) and headache of the tension-type (kappa = 0.43) not fulfilling the criteria. These results show that the IHS diagnostic criteria are satisfactorily applicable to high quality medical records abstracted by experienced neurologists.     

Clinical Characteristics of Migraine and Episodic Tension-Type Headache in Relation to Old and New Diagnostic Criteria

Eighty-one patients were diagnosed as having migraine, tension headache or both according to previously used criteria. Then we performed a standardized interview to determine the frequency and severity of headache characteristics used in the new operational diagnostic criteria of the International Headache Society (IHS). In every patient the original diagnosis fulfilled also the IHS criteria, but in 9 patients the criteria were only fulfilled in half or less of the attacks, and applying the IHS criteria they also achieved an additional diagnosis. In one patient these attacks did not fulfill the pain criteria and in 8 (4 migraine, 4 tension headache) they did not fulfill the criteria for accompanying symptoms. Overall the IHS criteria are sensitive and specific, but they may possibly be improved with regard to accompanying symptoms. The present study suggests that recording of frequency and graded severity of characteristics using a headache diary may further improve the distinction between the different types of headache.     

The IHS Classification Criteria for Migraine Headaches in Adolescents Need Minor Modifications

The operational and diagnostic criteria for migraine and all other headache disorders released in 1988 by the International Headache Society are universally considered reliable and exhaustive. These criteria, however, cannot be considered as satisfactory for population-based studies on migraine prevalence, especially if adolescents are the subjects of the study.
Using these diagnostic criteria, we conducted an epidemiological study in order to assess the prevalence of migraine headache in a student population aged 11 to 14 years. Our survey made it possible to code IHS 1.1 (migraine without aura) in 2.35%, IHS 1.2 (migraine with aura) in 0.62%, IHS 1.7 (migrainous disorders not fulfilling migraine criteria) in 1.52%, and IHS 13 (headache not classifiable) in 1.38% of the examined pupils.
In adolescents, the low prevalence estimates of migraine headache coded IHS 1.1 and the relatively high prevalence estimates of headaches coded IHS 1.7 and IHS 13 have appeared to be a consequence of the rigidity of some operational diagnostic criteria of the recent IHS classification rather than of the geographical, environmental, or socioeconomical pecularities of the cohort.
Therefore, in order to improve the reliability and the exhaustiveness of the IHS classification by increasing its sensitivity, we believe that minor modifications of the diagnostic criteria are necessary. Within these revised criteria, the subitem "moderate or severe intensity" of pain headache should become mandatory, whereas the lower limit of the criterion "duration of pain" should be reduced to 1 hour.     

Diagnosing Recurring Headaches: IHS Criteria and Beyond

SYNOPSIS
Current classification systems for diagnosing recurring headaches utilize sets of specific criteria. To determine the usefulness of these criteria in the practical application of diagnosing headache patients, 698 headache specialists were asked to review four case vignettes of headache patients and assign a diagnosis. They also ranked International Headache Society (IHS) criteria along with other features commonly used in the diagnosis of headaches in order of importance. There was no difference in ranked importance for the specific criteria posed by the IHS compared with commonly used criteria not included within the IHS system. A large majority of the respondents combined IHS features with other associated features not used in the IHS system as the basis of diagnostic assignment. These results raise a question about the acceptance and utilization of the IHS system as a basis for diagnoses. They also suggest that there is a need to educate health care providers about the appropriate use of the current IHS criteria to increase reliability of headache diagnosis.     

Chronic tension-type headache in children and adolescents

In this study, the causes, predisposing factors and clinical features of chronic daily headache in children and adolescents were studied within the population of patients attending a specialist headache. The International Headache Society's (IHS) criteria for the diagnosis of chronic tension type headache (CTTH) were assessed for their applicability in the paediatric age group. Over a period of three years, demographic and clinical data were collected prospectively on all children who attended the clinic and suffered from daily attacks of headache. One hundred and fifteen children and adolescents (32% of all clinic population) had chronic daily headache, of whom 93 patients (81%) fulfilled the IHS criteria for the diagnosis of CTTH. They were between 3-15 years of age (mean: 11.1, SD: 2.3) and their female to male ratio was 1.2 : 1. Around one third of the patients also suffered from migraine (mainly migraine without aura). The headache was described as mild in 60.9%, moderate 36.5% and severe 2.6%. Headache was located at the forehead in 53% or over the whole of the head in 29.6%. Pain was described as 'just sore' or dull by 73.9%. During attacks of headache, at least half the patients reported light intolerance, noise intolerance, anorexia or nausea. Thirty-two percent of patients had at least one underlying chronic disease that may have contributed to the pathogenesis of the CTTH. Eleven percent had serious stressful events related to family illnesses and in four patients headaches were triggered by family bereavement. Fourteen percent were investigated with neuroimaging and 22% were referred for clinical psychology assessment and management. In conclusion, CTTH is a common cause of headache in children attending a specialist headache clinic. The clinical features closely match those of adult population and the IHS criteria for the diagnosis of CTTH can be adapted for use in children. Predisposing stressful risk factors, physical or emotional, are present in a large proportion.     

Outcome of juvenile headache in outpatients attending 23 Italian headache clinics. Italian Collaborative Study Group on Juvenile Headache (Società Italiana Neuropsichiatria Infantile [SINPI])

A multicenter 3-year follow-up study was carried out on young patients with headache referred to tertiary headache centers or pediatric clinics. Three years after the first examination in 1993, 442 (of an original sample of 719) young outpatients with headache (226 females and 216 males) were re-examined. The diagnostic criteria of the International Headache Society (IHS) and those modified for migraine without aura by Winner et al were applied at both the baseline evaluation and the 3-year re-examination. At the follow-up, 290 children still had headache, 101 were in clinical remission, and 51 had dropped out. Using the current diagnostic criteria, only 46.2% of patients having migraine without aura, 50% of those having migraine with aura, and 35.3% of those suffering from migraine disorders which do not fulfill IHS criteria for migraine received the same diagnosis at the time of follow-up. The percentage of patients receiving a diagnosis of migraine without aura rose significantly when new modified criteria were used (60.5%), whereas a drop in the frequency of migraine disorders not fulfilling IHS criteria was observed at follow-up, both in patients with the diagnosis of migraine without aura at the first examination (4.6%) and in patients with migraine not always fulfilling IHS criteria at the first examination (6.2%). Among all patients who received this latter diagnosis at the first examination, it was possible to make a diagnosis of migraine with aura at the follow-up in 8.8% of cases and that of migraine without aura in 26.5%. No significant variations in the frequency of either episodic tension-type headache or chronic tension-type headache were found, with the exception of a slight decrease in the percentage of tension-type headache which did not fulfill IHS criteria, but the difference between the first examination and the follow-up values does not reach the level of statistical significance (5% versus 12%). As far as the evolution of migraine is concerned, 17.4% of patients with migraine were headache-free at the 3-year follow-up. In tension-type headache, the percentage of patients who were headache-free was particularly high in those with the episodic form (32.9%) and in those suffering from tension-type headache not fulfilling IHS criteria (29.1%). The majority of patients who had been diagnosed as having unclassifiable headache at the first examination received a correct diagnosis at the follow-up with the exception of one patient. As observed in adult patients, variations in the headache characteristics were also observed in children and adolescents (that is, migraine with aura can change to migraine without aura, or the latter can transform into episodic tension-type headache or chronic tension-type headache can change into the episodic form). This follow-up study was aimed at reaching a better understanding of headache disturbances in children and adolescents, examining, in particular, variations of headache with time in this stage of life.     

Migraine in children – an evaluation of the IHS criteria

The purpose of the present study was to compare the new criteria by the International Headache Society (IHS) with criteria for the definition of childhood migraine previously used. In particular, we considered the problem of the minimally acceptable headache duration in children. In a postal questionnaire, 36.5% of 3580 children 8–9 years old reported headache attacks. Ninety-five children (2.7%) fulfilled the IHS criteria. Three percent fulfilled the previously used migraine definition of Vahlquist. Some of the children in the latter group had considerably shorter headache attacks than those of the IHS patients, but otherwise their symptoms were very similar. When the IHS criterion of headache attack duration was lowered from a minimum of 2 h to 1 h, or omitted, the number of migraine patients increased from 95 to 114 and 127, respectively.     

Dental presentations of cluster headaches

Cluster headache has been defined by the International Headache Society (IHS) as one of the primary headaches. A primary headache is a headache that has no other known cause, such as infection or trauma. Cluster headache is also listed as one of the trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias. These headaches are mediated by the trigeminal nerve with accompanying autonomic symptoms that may range from conjunctival injection, lacrimation, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, forehead and facial sweating, miosis, and ptosis to eyelid edema. The IHS has described cluster headache as "attacks of severe, strictly unilateral pain that is orbital, supraorbital, temporal or in any combination of these sites, lasting 15 to 180 minutes." In the author’s practice, as a dentist treating orofacial pain, patients with cluster headache have dental or midfacial complaints as a primary presentation. This paper introduces such presentations based on interviews with cluster headache patients, with the main purpose of having midfacial complaints considered as an important presentation to be added to the IHS diagnostic criteria for cluster headache.     

Diagnostic issues in chronic daily headache

A number of patients attending specialty headache centers complain of very frequent, almost continuous headaches, which are usually grouped together under the term chronic daily headache (CDH), a category which does not appear in the International Headache Society (IHS) classification published in 1988. More than 10 years later, this issue is still debated, also in light of the foreseen revised classification. Several terms have been used to define the clinical picture of CDH, and different criteria have been proposed for the diagnosis of these forms. In most cases, CDH appears to evolve from an episodic migraine, but the temporal limits between an episodic and a no-longer episodic form of migraine are questionable. Although some theoretic problems remain unresolved, it seems that the next revision of the IHS classification can no longer ignore the existence of CDH.