Quality control limits for the standard anaerobic reference agar dilution susceptibility test procedure of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.

Multilaboratory studies were performed to develop MIC quality control limits for the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards reference agar dilution method for anaerobic susceptibility tests. Acceptable MICs were defined as those which include greater than 95% of all 100 MICs generated by the study. Most MIC control limits included either 2- or 3-dilution intervals rather than the more traditional 3-dilution intervals that are described as the mode +/- 1 doubling dilution.     

Comparison of the E test and a reference agar dilution method for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria

The susceptibility of 146 recent clinical isolates of gram-negative and gram-positive anaerobes was determined by the E test (AB Biodisk) on both Wilkins-Chalgren and PDM ASM II (AB Biodisk) agar. Results of the E test were compared with results obtained by the NCCLS agar dilution method using Wilkins-Chalgren agar. Incubation was for 20 hours and 44 hours in the E test and for 44 hours in the NCCLS method. In general, 44 hour results were more reliable; however, NCCLS readings were made only once after 44 hours. After two days of incubation, 91 % of E test results on Wilkins-Chalgren agar were within one dilution and 98 % within two dilutions of the corresponding NCCLS values; on PDM agar these values were 89 % and 98 %, respectively. Major and very major discrepancies combined were less than 1 %.     

Quality control criteria for testing the susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to meropenem.

Reference values for quality control of in vitro susceptibility tests with meropenem against anaerobic bacteria were determined in a multilaboratory study by the approved National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards agar dilution method for the four quality control strains. The study protocol also included the evaluation of microdilution testing, medium additives, and multiple lots of media. The recommended MIC control ranges for three of the control organisms are as follows: Bacteroides fragilis ATCC 25285, 0.06 to 0.125 micrograms/ml; Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron ATCC 29741, 0.125 to 0.5 micrograms/ml; and Eubacterium lentum ATCC 43055, 0.125 to 0.5 micrograms/ml. The modal MIC for Clostridium perfringens ATCC 13124 was at or below the lowest concentration of meropenem tested, and no values are recommended.     

Comparison of spiral gradient endpoint and agar dilution methods for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria: a multilaboratory collaborative evaluation.

A multilaboratory collaborative study was carried out to assess the utility of the spiral gradient endpoint (SGE) method for the determination of the antimicrobial susceptibilities of anaerobes and to evaluate the equivalence of the MICs obtained by the SGE method with those obtained by the reference agar dilution method of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. The standard deviation of the MIC obtained by the SGE method for the five participating laboratories was +/- 0.26 of a twofold dilution, whereas it was +/- 1 twofold dilution by the reference method. The interlaboratory reproducibility of the results for two control strains tested with imipenem, chloramphenicol, and metronidazole indicated that 96% of the measurements fell within +/- 1 twofold dilution of the mode. The equivalence of the SGE method with the agar dilution method was assessed with a wide variety of anaerobic organisms. The MICs by both methods were within 1 doubling dilution in 93% of the measurements (n = 1,074). Discrepancies generally occurred with those organism-drug combinations that resulted in tailing endpoints (Fusobacterium nucleatum, 86% agreement) or in cases of light growth (Peptostreptococcus spp., 86% agreement).     

Spiral gradient endpoint method compared to standard agar dilution for susceptibility testing of anaerobic gram-negative bacilli.

More efficient and reproducible alternative methods of performing agar dilution susceptibility testing are desirable, particularly for anaerobic bacteria. Anaerobes generally grow more reliably on solid media than they do in broth microdilution wells. A new method, the revised spiral gradient endpoint (SGE) method, was evaluated against the standard agar dilution (SAD) method by using a wide variety of anaerobic gram-negative bacilli (161 strains) and eight antimicrobial agents. For the SGE method, a spiral plater was used to set up a concentration gradient of an antimicrobial agent within an agar plate across which bacterial strains were inoculated as radial streaks. After incubation, the MIC of the antimicrobial agent was calculated from the radial endpoint location where bacterial growth ceased along the streak. The MICs for 90% of strains tested (in micrograms per milliliter) and the cumulative percentages of susceptible strains at the breakpoints for the SGE and SAD methods, respectively, and for all 161 strains were as follows: for metronidazole, 2 and 100 versus 2 and 100; for imipenem, 1 and 99 versus 0.5 and 98; for ampicillin-sulbactam, 8 and 97 versus 8 and 98; for clindamycin, 4 and 90 versus 4 and 91; for cefoxitin, 32 and 95 versus 32 and 95; for mezlocillin, 256 and 88 versus greater than 128 and 86; for ampicillin, greater than or equal to 256 and 51 versus greater than 64 and 51; and for penicillin (in units per milliliter), greater than or equal to 512 and 71 versus greater than 64 and 65. The excellent agreement of these data and the greater sensitivity reproducibility, and efficiency of the revised SGE method warrant further evaluations. Assuming that these advantages are confirmed, the revised SGE method should be a useful alternative test method when detailed susceptibility data are desired.     

Evaluation of the E test for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

The susceptibilities of 105 clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria were determined by a new method, the E test (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden), and were compared with the MICs for these organisms obtained by the reference agar dilution method by using supplemented brucella and Wilkins-Chalgren agars. The E test is a plastic strip with a predefined antibiotic gradient immobilized on one side and a MIC interpretive scale printed on the other side. Strips with cefoxitin, cefotaxime, imipenem, penicillin, metronidazole, and clindamycin were used in this study. A suspension of the test strain equal to the visual turbidity of a no. 0.5 McFarland standard was prepared and swabbed onto a 150-mm-diameter plate. The strips were applied in a radial fashion, and the plates were incubated under anaerobic conditions. After growth had occurred, an ellipse of inhibition was seen around each strip. At the point of intersection of the ellipse with the strip, the MIC was read from the interpretive scale. For most antibiotic-organism combinations, the ellipse was clear and the endpoint was sharp. The E-test MICs were interpreted after overnight and 48-h incubation for 58 of the strains. After overnight incubation, 87% of the E-test MICs were within 1 dilution of the agar dilution MICs, and 98% were within 2 dilutions. After 48 h of incubation, agreement was 86 and 97% respectively. E-test MICs obtained for the Bacteroides fragilis group after overnight incubation were more comparable than those obtained after 48 h of incubation to agar dilution MICs determined at 48 h for all drugs except clindamycin. On brucella agar, there was a 2% categorical discrepancy rate between the E-test MICs and agar dilution MICs, which occurred mostly with cefoxitin. The E test is easy to perform and read, is suitable for all anaerobes, can be used to test single patient isolates as needed, and offers the laboratory a reliable method for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.     

Interpretive criteria and quality control guidelines for Neisseria gonorrhoeae susceptibility test standardization for cefotetan.

Cefotetan was tested in a multilaboratory study to standardize susceptibility testing criteria and quality control guidelines for Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Cefotetan was most active against penicillinase-producing and penicillin-susceptible strains (MIC for 50% of strains tested, 0.5 micrograms/ml) and was least active against the chromosomally resistant isolates (MIC for 50% of strains tested, 2 micrograms/ml). The recommended 30-micrograms disk cefotetan interpretive criteria were as follows: susceptible at greater than or equal to 26 mm (less than or equal to 2 micrograms/ml), intermediate at 20 to 25 mm (4 micrograms/ml), and resistant at less than or equal to 19 mm (greater than or equal to 8 micrograms/ml). Quality control guidelines for agar dilution and disk diffusion tests were established by using numerous GC agar lots, three cefotetan 30-micrograms disk lots, two quality control organisms, and a volume of tests consistent with National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards M23-T guidelines.     

Comparison of media for agar dilution susceptibility testing ofBordetella pertussis andBordetella parapertussis

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the fastidious speciesBordetella pertussis andBordetella parapertussis is not standardized. In an attempt to find the optimal medium for agar dilution testing, the activity of erythromycin againstBordetella pertussis andBordetella parapertussis (34 isolates each) was assessed using homologous broth/agar combinations of Bordet-Gengou, charcoal, Iso-Sensitest (Oxoid) and Mueller-Hinton media. Each medium was supplemented with 5 % and 20 % whole defibrinated horse blood. Mueller-Hinton medium supplemented with 5 % horse blood performed best overall.     

Evaluation of in vitro methods for testing ceftriaxone against anaerobic bacteria, including quality control guidelines.

Tests with 100 anaerobic bacterial isolates demonstrated comparability between ceftriaxone MICs obtained with the reference agar dilution procedure and those obtained with a broth microdilution susceptibility testing procedure. The aerobically incubated thioglycolate disk elution test was also evaluated. Six 30-micrograms ceftriaxone disks in 5 ml of thioglycolate separated strains for which MICs were less than or equal to 32 micrograms/ml from those for which MICs were greater than or equal to 64 micrograms/ml (6% overall discrepancies). Quality control limits for ceftriaxone agar dilution tests were determined to be as follows: Bacteroides fragilis ATCC 25285, 32 to 128 micrograms/ml; and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron ATCC 29741, 64 to 256 micrograms/ml.     

Comparison of Etest and agar dilution method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Flavobacterium isolates.

The Etest was evaluated as a possible alternative to the standard agar dilution method for susceptibility testing of nine antimicrobial agents against Flavobacterium species. In studies of 100 clinical isolates, the agreement between the MICs (+/-1 log2 dilution) obtained by the two methods was acceptable for cefotaxime, ceftazidime, amikacin, minocycline, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin (> 90%). Conversely, the agreement between the results obtained for piperacillin was limited (84%). The overall agreement was 92.5%.     

Comparison of E test with agar dilution for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

A collection of 150 Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates from Africa, where various resistance mechanisms among N. gonorrhoeae isolates are common, was used to the compare E test (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) with agar dilution susceptibility testing. MICs obtained by the E test agreed within 1 log2 concentration by the agar dilution method for 97.5, 97.3, 96.6, 94, and 84.7% of the tested isolates for penicillin, ciprofloxacin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, respectively. No significant difference in susceptibility categorization was observed between either method. The E test is an attractive alternative to the agar dilution technique and is a more appropriate method for N. gonorrhoeae susceptibility testing in developing countries.     

Comparison of the Etest and a microbroth dilution system (Sceptor) to a reference agar dilution method for susceptibility testing of Bilophila wadsworthia

Objective: To compare the Etest and a microbroth dilution system (Sceptor) to a reference agar dilution method for susceptibility testing of Bilophila wadsworthia.
Method: The susceptibility of 15 clinical isolates of Bilophila wadsworthia was determined by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) agar dilution method using triphenyltetrazolium chloride for endpoint determination. The results were compared with the results obtained by the E test and a commercial microbroth dilution system (Sceptor).
Results: Comparison of the MICs obtained by the reference method and the Etest revealed few discrepancies, with piperacillin and metronidazole being the only exceptions. The overall agreement was 70% within one dilution step. The discrepancies did not result in major interpretative errors. The overall essential agreement using susceptibility categories was 98% for the E test and 99% for the microdilution system.
Conclusions: Both methods may be considered as acceptable alternatives for testing individual isolates of B. wadsworthia.     

Comparison of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter spp. by the agar dilution and the agar disk diffusion methods

The correlation and the level of agreement between the standardized agar dilution and the agar disk diffusion methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter were investigated. A high-level agreement between the two methods was evident for aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones, while a low-level agreement was observed for other antibiotics.     

Evaluation of two media for antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria using the receiver operating characteristic procedure

Wilkins-Chalgren agar and Meat-Yeast agar were evaluated as media for antibiotic susceptibility testing using 112 anaerobic bacterial strains. The results obtained with the two media using the diffusion method were compared with those obtained by the dilution method as reference method. The results were analyzed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) procedure allowing a graphic representation of sensitivity and specificity of the technique for each cut-off value. The area under the ROC curves was calculated to compare the accuracy of the two methods. Six antibiotics were tested including amoxicillin, cefoxitin, piperacillin, doxycycline and clindamycin. For amoxicillin and clindamycin, the two methods showed a high and identical discriminative power for distinguishing susceptible bacteria from the others. Diffusion in Wilkins-Chalgren agar appeared better than diffusion in Meat-Yeast agar for separating resistant bacteria from bacteria of intermediate susceptibility (amoxicillin p<0.005; clindamycin p<0.04). For other drugs, diffusion in Wilkins-Chalgren agar always had a discriminative power higher than that obtained with diffusion in Meat-Yeast agar for separating susceptible bacteria from the others (cefoxitin p<0.0005; piperacillin p<0.02; doxycycline p<0.05). The Wilkins-Chalgren agar medium thus appeared superior to the Meat-Yeast agar medium using the ROC evaluation method, which would deserve wider utilization in the field of microbiology.     

Comparison of Etest, Vitek and agar dilution for susceptibility testing of colistin

In total, 172 isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia were tested for susceptibility to colistin by agar dilution, Etest and the Vitek 2 system. Isolates with a colistin MIC < or =2 mg/L were considered to be susceptible. Fifty-four (31%) Gram-negative isolates were resistant to colistin. Categorical agreement between agar dilution and Etest was 87%, and between agar dilution and Vitek 2 was 82%. Based on the data obtained, the Vitek 2 system was unreliable for detecting colistin resistance, and results obtained by Etest may require confirmation by a standard MIC susceptibility testing method.