Race-based medical mistrust,medication beliefs and HIV treatment adherence: test of a mediation model in people living with HIV/AIDS

Race-based medical mistrust significantly predicts non-adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) in people living with HIV. The current study builds on previous research that shows beliefs about medication necessity (i.e., “My medicines protect me from becoming worse”) and concerns (i.e., “Having to take my medicines worries me”) mediate the association between race-based medical mistrust and medication adherence. Racial and ethnic minority men and women living with HIV and receiving ART (N = 178) in a southern US city completed computerized measures of demographic and health characteristics, telephone interviews of race-based medical mistrust and medication beliefs, and unannounced phone-based pill counts for ART adherence. Multiple mediation modeling showed that medical mistrust is related to medication necessity and concerns beliefs and ART adherence. Furthermore, medication necessity beliefs predicted ART adherence. The indirect effect of medical mistrust on adherence through medication necessity beliefs was also significant. Results confirm that medication necessity beliefs, although not concerns beliefs, mediate the association between medical mistrust and ART adherence. Medication necessity beliefs offer a viable target for interventions to improve ART adherence in the context of mistrust that patients may have for medical providers and health care systems.     

Predictors of self-reported antidepressant adherence

The authors' objectives of this research were: (1) to assess levels of selfreported antidepressant adherence and reasons for nonadherence and (2) to investigate determinants of nonadherence. A group of general hospital and community psychiatry practice mood disorder outpatients (n=80) took a self-report questionnaire that assessed beliefs about antidepressants, self-efficacy, and reasons for nonadherence. High levels of adherence were reported: 58 patients (73%) indicated they took their medication as directed more than 80% of the time. Practical issues (e.g., simply forgetting or a change in routine) were the most frequently identified reasons for nonadherence. Patients were more likely to report nonadherence if they experienced a sexual side effect, had lower self-efficacy, were female, and had not completed post-secondary education. Clinicians should be cognizant of this complexity and address not only issues related to medication efficacy and tolerability, but also social mediators and health beliefs when prescribing antidepressants.     

Predictors of Self-Reported Antidepressant Adherence

The authors' objectives of this research were: (1) to assess levels of selfreported antidepressant adherence and reasons for nonadherence and (2) to investigate determinants of nonadherence. A group of general hospital and community psychiatry practice mood disorder outpatients (n = 80) took a selfreport questionnaire that assessed beliefs about antidepressants, self-efficacy, and reasons for nonadherence. High levels of adherence were reported: 58 patients (73%) indicated they took their medication as directed more than 80% of the time. Practical issues (e.g., simply forgetting or a change in routine) were the most frequently identified reasons for nonadherence. Patients were more likely to report nonadherence if they experienced a sexual side effect, had lower self-efficacy, were female, and had not completed post-secondary education. Clinicians should be cognizant of this complexity and address not only issues related to medication efficacy and tolerability, but also social mediators and health beliefs when prescribing antidepressants.     

Medication adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a critical appraisal of the existing literature

Adherence to medication in patients with rheumatoid arthritis is low, varying from 30 to 80%. Improving adherence to therapy could therefore dramatically improve the efficacy of drug therapy. Although indicators for suboptimal adherence can be useful to identify nonadherent patients, and could function as targets for adherence-improving interventions, no indicators are yet found to be consistently and strongly related to nonadherence. Despite this, nonadherence behavior could conceptually be categorized into two subtypes: unintentional (due to forgetfulness, regimen complexity or physical problems) and intentional (based on the patient's decision to take no/less medication). In case of intentional nonadherence, patients seem to make a benefit-risk analysis weighing the perceived risks of the treatment against the perceived benefits. This weighing process may be influenced by the patient's beliefs about medication, the patient's self-efficacy and the patient's knowledge of the disease. This implicates that besides tackling practical barriers, clinicians should be sensitive to patient's personal beliefs that may impact medication adherence.     

Gaining insight into patients' beliefs using qualitative research methodologies

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Qualitative research is a rigorous inductive approach to data collection and data interpretation used to describe patients' perspectives and behaviors. Qualitative research can also be used to develop hypotheses to be tested with quantitative procedures. Combining qualitative and quantitative methodologies can provide more-comprehensive explanations for health actions and beliefs than can be derived from either approach alone. This review serves as a primer for those health care professionals who are unfamiliar with this alternative research paradigm. RECENT FINDINGS: We will explore the similarities and differences between quantitative and qualitative techniques and describe how focus groups allowed us an enhanced appreciation of the reasons for poor inhaled-corticosteroid adherence in low-income African-American patients with persistent asthma. SUMMARY: As populations become more diverse, providers are under increased pressure to effectively communicate and partner with their patients. Qualitative research offers the practitioner a roadmap for enhanced understanding of the unique experiences of patients, thus promoting quality patient-provider relationships.     

Qualitative research-enhanced understanding of patients' beliefs: results of focus groups with low-income,urban, African American adults with asthma

BACKGROUND: Qualitative research is an important research methodology for understanding the health beliefs and attitudes of patients. These beliefs and attitudes have been proposed as partial explanations for low adherence to medical therapy and the consequent high burden of morbidity from asthma among low-income urban minorities. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore barriers to adherence to inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), health beliefs regarding asthma and its treatment, and opinions about providers and clinical research among low-income groups. METHODS: Three focus groups were conducted with 15 low-income, urban, African American adults with persistent asthma. These focus group sessions were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and coded by using qualitative analytic techniques. RESULTS: Health beliefs that influenced adherence included patients' reliance on their assessment of asthma control over that of the health provider and concern over the adverse effects of ICS therapy. Adherence was also adversely affected by social obligations and insurers' approval policies and restricted formularies. Although mistrust of the medical establishment was evident, members generally expressed a willingness to participate in nonpharmacologic clinical research and the belief that research was beneficial. However, they had strong preferences for where the research should be conducted. CONCLUSIONS: Although barriers exist to ICS adherence in patient populations, many of these can be addressed during patient-clinician interactions. Qualitative research is an important tool for formulating hypotheses for improving ICS adherence that can then be tested in the future by using quantitative research methods.     

Medication adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a critical appraisal of the existing literature

Adherence to medication in patients with rheumatoid arthritis is low, varying from 30 to 80%. Improving adherence to therapy could therefore dramatically improve the efficacy of drug therapy. Although indicators for suboptimal adherence can be useful to identify nonadherent patients, and could function as targets for adherence-improving interventions, no indicators are yet found to be consistently and strongly related to nonadherence. Despite this, nonadherence behavior could conceptually be categorized into two subtypes: unintentional (due to forgetfulness, regimen complexity or physical problems) and intentional (based on the patient’s decision to take no/less medication). In case of intentional nonadherence, patients seem to make a benefit–risk analysis weighing the perceived risks of the treatment against the perceived benefits. This weighing process may be influenced by the patient’s beliefs about medication, the patient’s self-efficacy and the patient’s knowledge of the disease. This implicates that besides tackling practical barriers, clinicians should be sensitive to patient’s personal beliefs that may impact medication adherence.     

Qualitative Inquiry in Athletic Training: Principles,Possibilities, and Promises

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the principles of qualitative research and provide insights into how such methods can benefit the profession of athletic training. BACKGROUND: The growth of a profession is influenced by the type of research performed by its members. Although qualitative research methods can serve to answer many clinical and professional questions that help athletic trainers navigate their socioprofessional contexts, an informal review of the Journal of Athletic Training reveals a paucity of such methods. DESCRIPTION: We provide an overview of the characteristics of qualitative research and common data collection and analysis techniques. Practical examples related to athletic training are also offered. APPLICATIONS: Athletic trainers interact with other professionals, patients, athletes, and administrators and function in a larger society. Consequently, they are likely to face critical influences and phenomena that affect the meaning they give to their experiences. Qualitative research facilitates a depth of understanding related to our contexts that traditional research may not provide. Furthermore, qualitative research complements traditional ways of thinking about research itself and promotes a greater understanding related to specific phenomena. As the profession of athletic training continues to grow, qualitative research methods will assume a more prominent role. Thus, it will be necessary for consumers of athletic training research to understand the functional aspects of the qualitative paradigm.     

Adherence to antiviral drug regimens in HIV-infected adolescent patients engaged in care in a comprehensive adolescent and young adult clinic

Inconsistent use of antiviral medications for the treatment of HIV may lead to the emergence of resistant strains in HIV-infected adults. Patterns of adherence with these drug regimens in adolescents remains unknown. Identifying nonadherence in HIV-infected patients to antiviral regimens and developing corrective measures could improve patient outcomes. This study was undertaken to understand adherence in HIV-infected youths engaged in care and to reduce patterns of nonadherence. A retrospective analysis of 25 charts (78%) of HIV-infected youths (n = 32, age 13 to 21 years) were consecutively reviewed from January 1993 to May 1998. Charts were reviewed for documentation of factors previously documented to be associated with adherence: housing stability, social support, prior sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and/or pregnancy, HIV exposure category, number of clinic visits, number of pills per day, number of medications per day, knowledge of medication schedule, age, gender, race/ethnicity, health status as revealed by CD4 count and viral load, and recorded patterns of adherence to medications and clinic appointments. Thirteen of the 18 (72%) patients who were receiving antiretroviral medication were nonadherent. Sixty-seven percent of the females and 80% of the males reported missing doses. Housing instability (p = 0.031) and/or length of treatment with antiviral medications (months of treatment) (p = 0.043) were significantly correlated with nonadherence. The stability of the adolescents' living situations was the most significant correlate of medication adherence for this population of HIV-infected youth.     

Sociocognitive Factors Associated with Nonadherence to Medication After Hospital Discharge

Poor adherence to prescribed medication is a well-known problem and continues to be a major challenge in all medical specialties. Unlike previous studies that have mainly focused on nonadherence behaviors in specific diseases, this study sought to examine socio-cognitive factors associated with nonadherence behavior in a sample of a general clinical population. A questionnaire investigating socio-demographic and cognitive factors and a telephone follow-up interview were administered to 84 patients recruited in a General Medicine Unit before their discharge. Half of the participants were informed about that follow-up procedure. One month after hospital discharge, 42% of uninformed patients reported nonadherence behaviors, as against 21% of informed patients. Middle-aged patients and short-term treatments were associated significantly more often with nonadherence. Among cognitive factors, patients’ perceived risks and benefits of nonadherence, personal susceptibility to diseases, subjective health value, and reported memory failures were significantly associated with adherence. We conclude that a patient's perception may be more important than medication load, illness severity, and complexity of regimen in influencing medication adherence, and that a telephone call follow-up helps in monitoring medication adherence after hospital discharge.     

Health beliefs and medication adherence in patients with hypertension: A systematic review of quantitative studies

ObjectiveThis review synthesizes findings of quantitative studies examining the relationship between health beliefs and medication adherence in hypertension.MethodsThis review included published studies in PubMed, CINHAL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases. Studies were included if they examined beliefs of patients with hypertension. Quality of the studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment Tool for Systematic Review of Observational Studies.ResultsOf the 1558 articles searched, 30 articles were included in the analysis. Most beliefs examined by studies of this review in relation to medication adherence were beliefs related to hypertension severity and susceptibility to its consequences, medication effectiveness or necessity, and barriers to medication adherence. Higher medication adherence was significantly related to fewer perceived barriers to adherence (e.g, side-effects) was fairly consistent across studies. Higher self-efficacy was related to higher medication adherence. Patients' beliefs and their relationship to medication adherence appear to vary unpredictably across and within countries.ConclusionClinicians should assess beliefs for individual patients. When individual beliefs appear likely to undermine adherence, it may be useful to undertake educational interventions to try to modify them.Practical implicationsClinicians should explore individual patients' beliefs about hypertension and blood pressure medications, discuss their implications for medication adherence, and try to modify counterproductive beliefs.     

Adherence to medication in stroke survivors: a qualitative comparison of low and high adherers

Objectives. The aim of this study was to investigate factors that may explain variance in adherence to medication in stroke patients. Design. A qualitative comparison of high and low adherers to medication. Methods. Thirteen participants, selected from a sample of 180 stroke survivors because they self‐reported the lowest adherence to medication regimes, were matched with 13 reporting maximal adherence. All took part in semi‐structured qualitative interviews. Results. Thematic analysis revealed that those with poor adherence to medication reported both intentional and non‐intentional non‐adherence. Two main themes emerged: the importance of stability of a medication routine and beliefs about medication and treatment. High adherers reported remembering to take their medication and seeking support from both family and health professionals. They also had a realistic understanding of the consequences of non‐adherence, and believed their medicine did them more good than harm. Low adherers reported forgetting their medication, sometimes intentionally not taking their medication and receiving poor support from medical staff. They disliked taking their medication, had limited knowledge about the medication rationale or intentions, and often disputed its benefits. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that appropriate medication and illness beliefs coupled with a stable medication routine are helpful in achieving optimal medication adherence in stroke patients. Interventions designed to target both intentional and non‐intentional adherence may help maximize medication adherence in stroke patients.     

Self-regulation predictors of medication adherence among ethnically different pediatric patients with renal transplants.

OBJECTIVE: To predict medication adherence among ethnically different pediatric patients with renal transplants between the ages of 6 and 20 years old, using self-regulation variables including motivation, perceived control and responsibility, and perceived support. METHODS: Twenty-six African American children and 42 Caucasian children were verbally administered the Self-Regulation of Medication Adherence Battery to assess their (1) motivation to be medication adherent, (2) perceived control of and responsibility for medication adherence, and (3) perceived support of medication adherence from their primary caregiver. Four measures were used to assess medication adherence: self-ratings, nephrologists' ratings, cyclosporine levels, and pill count/refill histories. RESULTS: For the African American patients, regression analyses revealed that responses to motivation and perceived control questions that focused on self-efficacy were unique predictors of medication adherence as rated by their primary nephrologist. For the Caucasian patients, one motivation question regarding how often they forget to take their medication predicted their self-reported adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Facilitating their beliefs that they can regularly take their medications may help promote medication adherence among African American children with renal transplants, whereas for Caucasian children, providing cues and reminders to take their medications may help. We discuss implications of the results for multimodal assessment of medication adherence and for ethnic group-specific medication adherence research and interventions.     

Intentional and unintentional nonadherence: a study of decision making

Nonadherence to medical regimens is a major problem in health care. Distinguishing between intentional nonadherence (missing/altering doses to suit one's needs) and unintentional nonadherence (forgetting to take medication) may help in understanding nonadherence. Participants with respiratory conditions completed an anonymous questionnaire about (i) nonadherence; (ii) reasons for and against taking medications; and (iii) perceived style of the consultation in which their medication was first prescribed, as well as demographic and clinical variables. Consistent with the hypotheses, intentional nonadherence is predicted by the balance of individuals' reasons for and against taking medication as suggested by the Utility Theory, where these reasons include only those which the individual considers relevant and on which he/she focuses. Unintentional nonadherence is less strongly associated with decision balance, and more so with demographics. The research highlights the importance of (a) treating intentional and unintentional nonadherence as separate entities and (b) assessing individuals' idiosyncratic beliefs when considering intentional nonadherence.     

Adherence to antiretroviral therapy in patients receiving free treatment from a government hospital in Blantyre, Malawi

OBJECTIVES: To compare 3 measures of adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) in HIV-positive adults receiving free treatment from a public hospital in Malawi. METHODS: Adherence was measured over 1 month by pill count (PC), self-report, and a medication event monitoring system RESULTS: Data from 80 patients were available for analysis. The mean patient age was 38.6 years, and 57.5% were female. The mean adherence using the MEMS cap (MC) was 88.1%. Forty-six (57.5%) patients had MC adherence > or =95%, and 13 (16.2%) had <80% adherence. There was no association between MC adherence and time on ART. Mean PC adherence was 98.6%, significantly higher than MC adherence (P < 0.001). There was no clear relation between PC and MC adherence: 4 patients had MC adherence <20% but PC adherence of 100%. Self-reports of missing a tablet did not correlate with poor MC adherence. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows the complexities of measuring adherence and probable overestimation of adherence by PC and self-report. Because these are the main methods used in developing countries, this raises concerns about the development of drug resistance. Improved methods are needed to detect nonadherence in developing countries, and validation of MC data with drug levels and virologic outcome in this setting is important.     

Women and Vulnerability to HAART Non-Adherence: A Literature Review of Treatment Adherence by Gender from 2000 to 2011

A literature review of original research articles on adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) in developed countries, covering January 2000 to June 2011, was conducted to determine if gender differences exist in the prevalence of nonadherence to ART. Of the 1,255 articles reviewed, only 189 included data on the proportion of the study population that was adherent and only 57 (30.2%) of these reported proportional adherence values by gender. While comparing articles was challenging because of varied reporting strategies, women generally exhibit poorer adherence than men. Thirty of the 44 articles (68.2%) that reported comparative data on adherence by gender found women to be less adherent than men. Ten articles (17.5%) reported significant differences in proportional adherence by gender, nine of which showed women to be less adherent than men. These findings suggest that in multiple studies from developed countries, female gender often predicts lower adherence. The unique circumstances of HIV–positive women require specialized care to increase adherence to ART.     

Correlates of self-reported nonadherence to antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients: the Swiss HIV Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: Adherence is one of the most crucial issues in the clinical management of HIV-infected patients receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART). METHODS: A 2-item adherence questionnaire was introduced into the Swiss HIV Cohort Study in July 2003. All 3607 eligible patients were on ART for > or =6 months and their current regimen for > or =1 month. Three definitions of nonadherence were considered: missing > or =1 dose, missing > or =2 doses, and taking <95% of doses in the past 4 weeks. RESULTS: Over 30% of patients reported missing > or =1 dose, 14.9% missed > or =2 doses, and 7.1% took <95% of doses in the previous 4 weeks. The rate of drug holidays was 5.8%. Whether using more or less conservative definitions of nonadherence, younger age, living alone, number of previous regimens, and boosted protease inhibitor regimens were independent factors associated with nonadherence. There was a significant association between optimal viral suppression and nonadherence as well as a significant linear trend in optimal viral suppression by missed doses. CONCLUSIONS: Younger age, lack of social support, and complexity of therapy are important factors that are related to nonadherence with ART. Investment in behavioral dimensions of HIV is crucial to improve adherence in ART recipients.     

Barriers to HIV Medication Adherence: Examining Distinct Anxiety and Depression Symptoms among Women Living with HIV Who Experienced Childhood Sexual Abuse

Experiencing sexual violence in childhood or adolescence is highly prevalent among some women living with HIV, often resulting in anxiety and depression symptoms in adulthood. Anxiety and depression have been associated with HIV medication nonadherence, yet little research has assessed distinct components of anxiety and depression as risk factors of HIV medication nonadherence. The current study examined distinct symptom components of anxiety and depression as predictors of HIV medication non-adherence among women living with HIV and childhood sexual abuse enrolled in a coping intervention. This secondary analysis included a sample of 85 women living with HIV and childhood sexual abuse and being prescribed antiretroviral medication who completed measures on anxiety, depression, and medication adherence. Results from a logistic regression analysis suggest that distinct components of anxiety may be related to medication nonadherence among this population. Targeted mental health interventions for this population may increase adherence to antiretroviral medication.     

Correlates and predictors of adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy: overview of published literature

Knowledge of factors associated with medication adherence could help HIV clinicians to target persons in need of intervention, design these interventions, and help researchers to plan studies of adherence. This review summarizes the results of 20 studies investigating the issue of barriers to optimal highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) adherence. Only a few determinants were consistently associated with nonadherence. Symptoms and adverse drug effects, psychologic distress, lack of social or family support, complexity of the HAART regimen, low patient self-efficacy, and inconvenience of treatment were the factors most consistently associated with nonadherence. There were inconsistent findings regarding the relationship of adherence and the following variables: sociodemographic characteristics, substance abuse, depressive symptoms, quality of life, CD4+ cell count, knowledge and beliefs about treatment, patients' satisfaction with health care, and patient-provider relationship. A synthesis of findings relating various factors to adherence to HAART is difficult to reach because of several limitations of the existing body of research. These limitations concern the measurement of adherence, the assessment of correlates and predictors of adherence, the study population, and the study design.