Treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea with nasal continuous positive airway pressure in stroke.

The prevalence of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) following stroke is high and OSA is associated with increased morbidity, mortality and poor functional outcome. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) is the treatment of choice for OSA, but its effects in stroke patients are unknown. The effectiveness and acceptance of treatment with nCPAP in 105 stroke patients with OSA, admitted to rehabilitation was prospectively investigated. Subjective wellbeing was measured with a visual analogue scale in 41 patients and 24-h blood pressure was determined in 16 patients before and after 10 days of treatment. Differences were compared between patients who did and did not accept treatment. There was an 80% reduction of respiratory events with concomitant increase in oxygen saturation and improvement in sleep architecture. No serious side-effects were noticed. Seventy-four patients (70.5%) continued treatment at home. Nonacceptance was associated with a lower functional status, as measured by the Barthel Index, and the presence of aphasia. Ten days after initiation of nCPAP, compliant users showed a clear improvement in wellbeing (differences in visual analogue scale (deltaVAS) mean+/-SD 26+/-26 mm) versus noncompliant patients (deltaVAS 2+/-25 mm, p=0.021). Only the compliant group had a reduction in mean nocturnal blood pressure (deltaBP; -8+/-7.3 mmHg versus 0.8+/-8.4 mmHg, p=0.037). Stroke patients with obstructive sleep apnoea can be treated effectively with nasal continuous positive airway pressure and show a similar improvement and primary acceptance to obstructive sleep apnoea patients without stroke. Continuous positive airway pressure acceptance is associated with improved wellbeing and decreased nocturnal blood pressure.     

Endocrine effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in male patients with obstructive sleep apnoea

OBJECTIVE: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a relatively common condition producing disabling somnolence and profound physiological responses to hypoxaemic episodes during sleep, including significant oscillations in blood pressure. This study aimed to provide controlled data on the interaction between OSA and endocrine axes to establish whether overrepresentation of pathology such as hypertension and hypogonadism in OSA subjects might have an endocrine basis. DESIGN, SETTING AND SUBJECTS: Parallel randomized sham placebo controlled 1-month trial of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in 101 male subjects with OSA presenting to a respiratory sleep clinic. METHODS: Analysis of gonadotrophins, testosterone, sex hormone binding protein (SHBG), prolactin, cortisol, thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (free T4), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), renin and aldosterone were performed at baseline and after 1 month's active or placebo nCPAP intervention. Quality of life questionnaire scoring was also recorded over the same time period. RESULTS: Testosterone and SHBG showed significant negative correlations with baseline OSA severity. Active treatment of OSA produced SHBG elevation and TSH reduction (P< or =0.03). Both groups showed an increase in aldosterone (P<0.001) and IGF-1 (P< or =0.03), associated with a large improvement in subjective quality of life scoring. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate significant changes in endocrine axes not previously reported in a placebo-controlled trial. OSA is a recognized reversible cause of testosterone reduction; SHBG suppression correlating to baseline OSA severity supports a diagnosis of secondary hypogonadism. Significant rises in aldosterone and IGF-1 on treatment coincide with increased physical activity and an improved quality of life score.     

Falls in blood pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea after long-term nasal continuous positive airway pressure treatment

OBJECTIVES: Effective treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) lowers blood pressure (BP). The long-term effects of nCPAP treatment on BP in OSA patients are not well known. The time period of such treatment sufficient to lower BP in OSA patients is also not known. We investigated compliance with long-term nCPAP therapy and its effects on BP. METHODS: This observational study involved 66 OSA patients [59 men, seven women; mean age, 51 (48-54) years; body mass index (BMI), 28.7 (27.7-29.7) kg/m; apnoea and hypopnoea, 50.3 (45.6-55.0)/h; 95% confidence intervals]. BP and BMI were measured before the study and at two checkpoints after usage of nCPAP [620 (552-688) and 1071 (1000-1143) days]. RESULTS: The different times between the first and second checkpoints for detecting objective compliance were 17 (4-30) min (P = 0.003). Diastolic BP decreased by 5.9 (3.1-8.7) mmHg after 600 days nCPAP treatment and by 4.6 (2.0-7.2) mmHg after 1000 days (P = 0.0006). Systolic BP and BMI did not change significantly. Usage of nCPAP treatment for a daily average of 3 h was needed to achieve a significant decrease in diastolic BP [7.4 (4.3-10.6) mmHg, P < 0.0001]. Diastolic BP of normotensive OSA patients did not change significantly by nCPAP treatment, but that of hypertensive OSA patients decreased significantly within 1 month-3 years of nCPAP treatment whether or not medication was used. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe OSA, the use of nCPAP for a daily average of 3 h would be sufficient to decrease the diastolic BP of hypertensive OSA patients.     

Efficacy of daytime continuous positive airway pressure titration in severe obstructive sleep apnoea.

The aim of this study was to evaluate manual nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) titration during daytime polysomnography compared with conventional overnight titration for patients with severe obstructive sleep apnoea. Thirty-two patients who underwent daytime titration were retrospectively matched (for age, sex, body mass index and apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI)) to a group titrated overnight during the same period. Successful titration was defined as the identification of the nCPAP level (effective nCPAP (Peff)) required to eliminate respiratory events during all sleep stages. After 3 months of therapy on nCPAP at Peff, nCPAP utilization history was obtained and a group of patients underwent a repeat polysomnogram (PSG) and completed a follow-up Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score. Initial titration was successful in 91% of daytime patients and 91% of overnight patients. The success of daytime titration was not related to diagnostic AHI or ESS score. Subjective nCPAP utilization was statistically similar in both groups. On the follow-up PSG, there were no significant differences between daytime (n=11) and overnight (n=11) patients in measures of sleep quality or respiratory disturbance. Both groups demonstrated similar and significant improvements in ESS score. These findings suggest that the effective nasal continuous positive airway pressure can be accurately established during daytime titration in a substantial proportion of severe, symptomatic obstructive sleep apnoea patients.     

Decrease in haematocrit with continuous positive airway pressure treatment in obstructive sleep apnoea patients.

Previous preliminary results have shown an overnight decrease in haematocrit and red cell count after the first night of treatment with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) patients. The present study was designed to confirm these preliminary data, and to analyse the long-term effects of CPAP. The haematocrit and red cell count (RCC) were measured in 80 OSA patients on two consecutive mornings, after an untreated night and after a CPAP treatment night. The haematocrit and RCC significantly decreased with CPAP (from 44.0 +/- 0.5 to 42.4 +/- 0.4%, p less than 0.0001 and from 4.769 +/- 0.051 to 4.597 +/- 0.052 x 10(12) red cells.l-1, p less than 0.0001, respectively). Neither the decrease in haematocrit nor the decrease in RCC were correlated with the decrease in urine volume or flow which occurred with CPAP. Thirty five of these patients remained untreated for 45 +/- 4 days, before home treatment with CPAP was initiated. The haematocrit and RCC had returned to values close to those before initial treatment and decreased again after the first treatment night. Twenty one of the patients were re-evaluated after at least one year of home treatment with CPAP, again on two consecutive nights either with CPAP or untreated. The follow-up, post-CPAP haematocrit and RCC were slightly and nonsignificantly higher than after the baseline CPAP night, but still lower than after the baseline untreated night (p less than 0.02). After the untreated follow-up night, no significant change in haematocrit was observed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Endothelial injury markers before and after nasal continuous positive airway pressure treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea hypopnoea syndrome

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether serum amyloid A (SAA), C-reactive protein (CRP), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) levels are elevated in obstructive sleep apnoea hypopnoea syndrome (OSAHS), and whether they change following acute- and medium-term CPAP treatment.

Methods

Consecutive subjects (n?=?40) referred to the Sleep Disordered Breathing Unit were included in the research. Sera were sampled in the afternoon prior to an in-hospital limited-channel sleep study and on the next morning. Those diagnosed with OSAHS were commenced on CPAP and had further blood samples collected in the morning after the first night and then after a month of treatment.

Results

We had 20 subjects with moderate/severe OSAHS (mean ± SD), 4 % desaturation rate (4 % DR) 44.3?±?31.4 events/h, and 20 comparator subjects with symptoms but negative sleep studies, 4 % DR 5.6?±?2.9 events/h. There was no difference in the morning and afternoon vascular injury marker levels between the OSAHS and comparator groups. However, CRP (6.52?±?9.53 vs. 5.58?±?8.47, p?=?0.04) and VCAM-1 (366.30?±?90.11 vs. 339.60?±?95.87, p?=?0.02) levels showed significant diurnal variation within the OSAHS group with higher afternoon levels compared to morning measurements. There were no changes in any of the vascular injury marker levels following CPAP.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that OSAHS leads to endothelial dysfunction as reflected by higher afternoon than morning CRP and VCAM-1 levels. However, despite a good CPAP compliance, a month of treatment does not decrease vascular injury marker levels.     

Clinical side effects of continuous positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea

CPAP is considered the gold standard treatment in OSA and is highly efficacious in controlling OSA symptoms. However, treatment effectiveness is limited because of many factors including low adherence due to side effects. This review highlights the range of side effects associated with CPAP therapy in patients with OSA. This information is important for the initiation of patients onto CPAP as well as their continued care while on treatment, given the increase in non‐medically supervised CPAP care models in use globally.     

Predicting optimal continuous positive airway pressure in Japanese patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome

Background and objective: Several algorithms that predict the optimal CPAP have been developed for Caucasian patients with OSA syndrome, but these algorithms do not allow for racial differences in craniofacial anatomy. We investigated whether an equation that included data on craniofacial structure, physique and severity of OSA could more accurately predict the optimal CPAP for Japanese patients with OSA syndrome. Methods: In 170 Japanese patients with OSA syndrome, the optimal CPAP was determined by manual titration during polysomnography. An equation predicting the optimal pressure was derived from anthropometric, polysomnographic and cephalometric data. This equation was validated in another 110 Japanese patients with OSA syndrome. Results: Stepwise multiple regression analysis identified AHI, BMI, mean SaO₂ and a cephalometric parameter: the angle between a line from point B to the menton (Me) and a line from Me to the hyoid bone (H) (BMeH), as independent predictors of optimal CPAP. The following equation was constructed to predict the optimal CPAP: 27.78 + (0.041 × BMeH) + (0.141 × BMI) + (0.040 × AHI) ? (0.312 × mean SaO₂). This equation accounted for 47% of the variance in optimal pressure (R² = 0.47, P < 0.0001). The measured optimal pressure and the pressure calculated using this equation were very similar in the other 110 patients with OSA syndrome (9.5 ± 3.0 and 9.2 ± 2.1 cmH₂O, respectively). Conclusion: Optimal CPAP was more accurately predicted by combining a cephalometric parameter with BMI and polysomnographic data in Japanese patients with OSA, suggesting that craniofacial structure may be important in the pathogenesis of OSA syndrome among Asians.     

Effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure on pulmonary haemodynamics and tissue oxygenation in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea

We investigated the acute effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on pulmonary haemodynamics and tissue oxygenation in eight men with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) by means of right heart catheterization. They were tested at four dosage levels of nasal CPAP: 0, 5, 10, and 15 cmH2O. Nasal CPAP significantly reduced the cardiac index at the 10 and 15 cmH2O doses. The mean pulmonary artery pressure was significantly elevated with 10 and 15 cmH2O, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was significantly increased with 15 cmH2O of nasal CPAP. Pulmonary vascular resistance was significantly increased with 10 cmH2O of nasal CPAP. The 5 cmH2O dose of nasal CPAP did not affect significantly these parameters. Mixed venous oxygen tension was unchanged at any pressure. We conclude that tissue oxygenation was maintained in the OSA patients during administration of nasal CPAP, even though a high CPAP clearly affected pulmonary haemodynamics.     

Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on ambulatory blood pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea

OBJECTIVES: Previous reports on the effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) on blood pressure has shown contradictory results. Accordingly, we have investigated the effects of CPAP on blood pressure and on the potential reversal of the diagnosis of hypertension in patients with OSA evaluated repeatedly by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. METHODS: We studied 122 patients (104 men and 18 women), 55.1+/-10.5 years of age, with diagnosis of OSA corroborated by overnight polysomnography at the clinic. Among those patients, 83 were treated with CPAP after their first evaluation, while 39 remained without CPAP for the duration of the trial. Blood pressure was measured by ambulatory monitoring at 20-min intervals during the day and at 30-min intervals at night for 48 consecutive hours, at baseline and after 2 and 4 months of intervention. RESULTS: There was a small, but not statistically significant, reduction in ambulatory blood pressure in patients treated with CPAP (0.7 and 1.5 mmHg in 24-h mean of systolic and diastolic blood pressure after 2 months of therapy; 2.0 and 2.3 mmHg after 4 months; P>0.239). The blood pressure reduction was very similar in patients with OSA followed for 4 months without CPAP (1.9 and 2.2 mmHg in 24-h mean of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively; P=0.543). We found a high (77%) prevalence of hypertension among the patients participating in this study, although only 37% were receiving antihypertensive medication at the time of recruitment. The prevalence of hypertension was slightly but not significantly reduced to just 74% after 4 months of treatment with CPAP. CONCLUSIONS: The small reduction in blood pressure for consecutive profiles of ambulatory monitoring can probably be explained by the documented 'ABPM pressor effect' on patients using the ambulatory device for the first time. The high prevalence of hypertension among patients with OSA is not significantly reduced by treatment with CPAP. These results suggest that patients with OSA should always be properly evaluated for diagnosis of hypertension, and provided, if needed, with antihypertensive treatment apart from the recommended CPAP.     

Effect of nocturnal nasal continuous positive airway pressure on blood pressure in obstructive sleep apnea

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a very common risk factor for hypertension, and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has been widely used to treat OSA. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials to evaluate the effects of CPAP on blood pressure, reported as either a primary or secondary end point, among patients with OSA. Studies were retrieved by searching Medline (January 1980 to July 2006), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, conference abstracts, and bibliographies of review and original articles. From 255 relevant reports, 16 randomized clinical trials were selected that compared CPAP to control among participants with OSA, had a minimum treatment duration of 2 weeks, and reported blood pressure changes during the intervention or control period. Data on sample size, participant characteristics, study design, intervention methods, duration, and treatment results were independently abstracted by 2 investigators using a standardized protocol. Data from 16 trials representing 818 participants were examined using a random-effects model. Mean net change in systolic blood pressure for those treated with CPAP compared with control was -2.46 mm Hg (95% CI: -4.31 to -0.62); mean net change in diastolic blood pressure was -1.83 mm Hg (95% CI: -3.05 to -0.61); and mean net change in mean arterial pressure was -2.22 mm Hg (95% CI: -4.38 to -0.05). Net reductions in blood pressure were not statistically different between daytime and nighttime. These results indicate that CPAP decreases blood pressure among those with OSA and may help prevent hypertension.     

Left ventricular function in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome before and after treatment with nasal continuous positive airway pressure

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have yielded disparate results regarding the effect of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) syndrome on left ventricular (LV) function. OBJECTIVES: In order to clarify this, we performed a prospective study investigating OSA patients with no history of systemic hypertension, coronary artery disease, myocardial, pericardial or valvular problems, asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease before and after treatment with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP). METHODS: Fifteen patients (3 women, 12 men) with an apnoea/hypopnoea index >15 (mean +/- SD = 52 +/- 21) were studied with complete polysomnography, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, M-mode two-dimensional echocardiography and pulsed Doppler echocardiography in two phases, i.e. before and after 12-14 weeks of nCPAP therapy. We measured systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) separately in the daytime and night-time, isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT), the ratio of peak early filling velocity (E) to peak late velocity (A) diastolic transmitral flow (E/A), posterior wall thickness (PWT) and septal thickness (IVST). The shortening fraction (SF) was also calculated. Eleven overweight non-apnoeic normal subjects matched for age were used as the control group. RESULTS: Our results showed that the patient group exhibited, before treatment, LV diastolic, but not systolic, dysfunction compared with the normal group (IVRT = 94.3 +/- 11.6 ms, p < 0.05; E/A = 0.94 +/- 0.26, p < 0.02; SF = 39.9 +/- 4.1%, not significant (NS); IVST = 9.9 +/- 1.2 mm, NS; PWT = 8.3 +/- 1.2 mm, NS). Moreover, the patient group developed diastolic hypertension both in the daytime and night-time (BP/diastolic/daytime = 93.3 +/- 9.2 mm Hg, BP/diastolic/night-time = 90.3 +/- 10.7 mm Hg). After 12-14 weeks of nCPAP treatment (no change in body mass index), significant improvement in LV diastolic function and a drop in blood pressure were noticed (IVRT = 85.6 +/- 8.8 ms, p < 0.05; E/A = 1.07 +/- 0.3, p < 0.05; BP/diastolic/daytime = 86.3 +/- 5.5 mm Hg, p < 0.02; BP/diastolic/night-time = 83.9 +/- 8. 6 mm Hg, p < 0.05) in our patient group. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that repetitive apnoeas/hypopnoeas are very important factors in the development of both LV diastolic dysfunction and diastolic systemic hypertension in patients with OSA syndrome. Treatment with nCPAP leads to significant improvement in both ventricular function and systemic hypertension.     

Long-term compliance with nasal continuous positive airway pressure therapy of obstructive sleep apnea

In an attempt to identify predictors of long-term compliance with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), we reviewed the records of 125 patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) referred to our center for nasal CPAP trials. Severity of sleep apnea, sleep staging, daytime hypersomnolence, effectiveness of nasal CPAP, previous palatal surgery, and adverse reactions were compared in compliant and noncompliant patients. Nineteen patients did not tolerate a nasal CPAP trial in the laboratory or refused home nasal CPAP therapy. Ten patients were unavailable for follow-up. Of the remaining 96 patients, 23 (24 percent) had discontinued therapy, while 73 (76 percent) were still using nasal CPAP at 14.5 +/- 10.7 months (mean +/- SD). There were no statistically significant differences between the compliant and noncompliant patients in baseline apnea plus hypopnea index (AHI), baseline sleep staging, AHI while receiving nasal CPAP, sleep staging while receiving nasal CPAP, or frequency of adverse reactions during therapy. Severe daytime sleepiness was present in 65 of the 73 compliant patients and in 12 of the 23 noncompliant patients (p less than 0.05). Ten of 43 in the compliant group had previous palatal surgery compared with ten of 23 noncompliant patients (p less than 0.05). Our data confirm earlier observations in smaller samples that compliant and noncompliant patients have equally severe sleep apnea and good initial responses to nasal CPAP. Long-term compliance with nasal CPAP may be associated with the severity of daytime hypersomnolence on presentation. Previous palatal surgery was more frequent in patients who did not tolerate long-term nasal CPAP therapy.     

Long-term treatment with continuous positive airway pressure improves quality of life in obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome.

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is an established treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS). While it is known that CPAP reverses the pathological breathing pattern and improves daytime sleepiness, there are no sufficient data on the long-term influence of CPAP on quality of life in patients with OSAS. Thirty-nine patients with polysomnographically verified OSAS (apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI): (mean+/-SD) 46.8+/-21.8 events x h(-1)) were prospectively studied. All patients answered three quality of life measures (Complaint List, Nottingham Health Profile Part 1 (NHP), and Verbal Analogue-Scale "quality of life") prior to the initiation of CPAP therapy. After a mean of 9 months they were re-evaluated by polysomnography, and completed the questionnaires once again. As expected, CPAP was effective in treating the sleep-related breathing disorder. AHI decreased significantly from (mean+/-SD) 46.8+/-21.8 events x h(-1) to 3.3+/-6.3 events x h(-1), and minimum oxygen saturation increased from 77.1+/-9.3% to 89.9+/-3.4%, while body mass index did not change significantly (31.3+/-5.4 versus 30.8+/-4.8 kg x m(-2)). During long-term treatment with CPAP the Complaint List revealed a significant improvement of the extent of subjective impairment due to physical and general complaints (26.4+/-9.9 versus 20.4+/-11.1), and NHP a significant improvement of emotional reactions (19.8+/-21.7 versus 11.1+/-14.0) and energy (50.8+/-36.6 versus 32.1+/-36.7), but not of pain, physical mobility, sleep, social isolation, and quality of life as assessed by the It is concluded that long-term continuous positive airway pressure therapy is effective in improving not only pathological breathing patterns but also parameters that estimate quality of life in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome.     

持续气道正压通气对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者睡眠结构的影响

目的探讨患者白天嗜睡等症状的原因,评估经鼻持续气道内正压通气(nCRAP)治疗对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者睡眠结构的影响。方法选择2001-2004年广东省佛山市第一人民医院呼吸科34例OSAS病人在睡眠多导生理记录仪监测下,进行nCPAP治疗,观察治疗前后呼吸紊乱指数、血氧饱和度和睡眠结构的变化。结果治疗后呼吸紊乱指数下降,最低血氧饱和度上升,睡眠结构明显改善。结论nCRAP能有效地改善OSAS病人的睡眠结构和呼吸紊乱。     

Effect of continuous positive airway pressure vs placebo continuous positive airway pressure on sleep quality in obstructive sleep apnea

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy has become the treatment of choice for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, the efficacy of CPAP therapy has not been evaluated against a suitable control. We investigated the effectiveness of CPAP therapy in improving sleep quality in patients with OSA. We hypothesized that CPAP improves sleep quality. PATIENTS: Forty-eight CPAP-naive OSA patients were evaluated. None were receiving antihypertensive medications, and none had major medical illnesses. DESIGN: Patients were randomized to receive either CPAP or placebo CPAP (CPAP at an ineffective pressure) for 7 days in a double-blind fashion. Forty-one patients completed the protocol. Sleep quality variables, arousals, sleep arterial oxygen saturation (SaO(2)), and respiratory disturbance index (RDI) were assessed at baseline, after 1 day of treatment, and after 7 days of treatment. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to evaluate the effects of treatment, time, and the interaction of the two. RESULTS: As expected, CPAP lowered RDI and number of arousals, and increased SaO(2) over time (p = 0.001). Contrary to expectations, both CPAP and placebo CPAP had comparable effects on sleep quality as assessed by sleep architecture, sleep efficiency, total sleep time, and wake after sleep onset time. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the effectiveness of CPAP in lowering the number of arousals and the RDI, and in raising SaO(2). However, our data suggest that short-term CPAP is no different than placebo in improving sleep architecture. Further evaluation of the effectiveness of CPAP using a suitable placebo CPAP in prospective randomized studies is needed