Sedation in the critically ill patient

Critically ill patients who require intensive care need effective analgesia and sedation to control potentially unpleasant symptoms, such as pain and anxiety. Analgesics and sedatives are also used to allow patients to tolerate nursing procedures and tracheal intubation as well as to aid mechanical ventilation. Metabolism of traditional opioids is dependent on organ function, which is abnormal among critically ill patients. The use of a score system to ensure sufficient but not excessive sedation should be mandatory. Sufentanil and remifentanil are more predictable opioids that are suitable for either sedation or analgesia in critically ill patients to achieve an adequate Ramsay score from 2 to 4.     

Monitoring consciousness in intensive care medicine

Sedation and analgesia are important components of care for critically ill patients. Avoiding over-as well as undersedation is of utmost importance as both states carry considerable risks and may influence outcome. The management of sedation has changed dramatically over the past two decades from providing a dosage level by which the patient was kept in a deep stage of anaesthesia to a current dosing strategy allowing the administration of drugs in line with individual need, resulting in most cases in a slightly sedated, cooperative patient. The importance of monitoring the level of sedation and analgesia has only recently been realised. Most importantly, regularly determining the appropriate level of sedation and analgesia as well as monitoring the desired level of sedation will help to minimise the adverse effects of sedation. Clinical sedation scales are, however, subjective, and most lack proper validation. Thus, an objective measure of sedation, such as the use of processed electroencephalogram (EEG) parameters is desirable. Processed EEG algorithms such as the bispectral index were initially introduced into clinical practice as a tool to assess the depth of anaesthesia objectively in the operating room. However, patients under general anaesthesia differ from those in an intensive care unit. Accordingly, most results from studies evaluating the performance of processed EEG parameters in critically ill patients have not been satisfactory. At present, monitoring sedation with processed EEG parameters cannot generally be recommended. However, in special situations such as deep sedation and neuromuscular blockade, in which clinical sedation scales are prone to failure, the bispectral index may help to assess the level of sedation.     

Critically ill medical patients, their demographics and outcome

There are few reports describing the demographic details and outcome of noncoronary medical patients on adult general intensive care units. It is not known how medical patients differ from other critically ill patients and how this may influence their outcome. Consequently, we recorded the demographic details of 374 critically ill medical patients and followed their survival for up to 3 years. Patients referred from medical specialties are younger, more severely ill and suffer a higher severity-of-illness-adjusted intensive care unit mortality than other patients. The short-term survival of medical patients is poor with a median survival of 40 days. Twenty per cent of medical patients die after discharge from intensive care but before 40 days. However, the long-term survival of medical patients is better than other patients and almost as good as the general population. Further research is required to identify those patients who are likely to survive beyond 40 days.     

Patient monitoring.

Optimum results are obtained in the care of the critically ill patient if efforts are directed to maintaining the internal environment in a state as near normal as possible. This cannot be done without the use of basic monitoring procedures. Complex investigations may have a legitmate and necessary role as research tools. There is, however, a real risk of complex procedures becoming an end in themselves in general intensive therapy units, where they are apt to distract overworked nurses and medical attendants from the care of their patients. It is important, therfore, for clearcut indications for various monitoring procedures to be defined, and in this paper an attempt has been made to outline alogical approach to the monitoring of critically ill genral surgical patients admitted intensive therapy units.     

Anemia and red blood cell transfusion in the critically ill

Critically ill patients are anemic early in their intensive care unit (ICU) course. As a consequence of this anemia they receive a large number of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. There is little evidence that "routine" transfusion of stored allogeneic RBCs is beneficial to critically ill patients and may in fact be associated with worse clinical outcomes. It is clear that most critically ill patients can tolerate hemoglobin levels as low as 7 g/dl and therefore a more conservative approach to RBC transfusion is warranted. Strategies to minimize loss of blood and increase the production of RBCs are also important in the management of all critically ill patients.     

Transoesophageal echocardiography in critical care

Echocardiography has evolved to become one of the most versatile modalities for diagnosing and guiding treatment of critically ill patients. Both transthoracic (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) provide real-time bedside information about a variety of structural and functional abnormalities of the heart as well as contractility, filling status and cardiac output, rendering it the method of choice for the assessment of cardiac function in the intensive care unit (ICU). Both approaches have its benefits and limitations. Although TTE remains the approach of choice, TEE has been shown to be of additional value in many instances in critically ill patients due to its ability to provide excellent visualisation of cardiac structures, its impact on patient management, and its low complication rate (2.6%). The present status of TEE in adult critical care is reviewed with special emphasis on its role as a diagnostic tool in several clinical scenarios, underlining its effects on clinical decision making but also as a monitoring adjunct. Conditions and settings in which TEE provides the most definitive diagnosis in the critically ill and injured are hemodynamically unstable patients with suboptimal TTE images or if mechanically ventilated, patients with suspected aortic dissection or aortic injury and other conditions in which TEE is superior to TTE (such as suspected endocarditis, cardiac or aortic source of emboli. The diagnostic, therapeutic and surgical impact on patient management in critically ill patients ranged from 44% to 99% (weighted mean 67.2%), 10% to 69% (weighted mean 36%), and 2% to 29% (weighted mean 14.1%), respectively, depending on patients and type of ICU. Since echocardiography provides different information than other devices for hemodynamic monitoring such as the pulmonary artery catheter the methods are therefore not competitive but rather complementary. The present body of evidence supporting the use of TEE in critically ill patients lacks prospective, randomized controlled studies focusing on end-points like cost-effectiveness, morbidity or mortality. However, present evidence as well as experience, points to the significant benefits which may be gained by the availability of echocardiography and especially TEE in ICUs, as well the necessity for a training of intensive care physicians.     

Survey of epidural analgesia management in general intensive care units in England

BACKGROUND: The management of epidural analgesia is controversial. Many intensive care unit (ICU) patients may benefit from this form of analgesia but have one or more contraindications to its use. Sepsis, coagulopathy, insertion in a sedated, ventilated patient, and lack of consent are common problems in ICU patients. Little has been published to help guide practice in this area. I wished to establish the current practice of the management of epidural analgesia in general ICUs in England when relative or absolute contraindications occur, in order to determine the current standard of care for placement and use of epidural analgesia in ICU patients. METHODS: A postal questionnaire survey of the management of epidural analgesia in critically ill patients was sent to the named clinical director of all (216) general ICUs in England. RESULTS: Responses were received from 159 (75%) units: 89% of responding units use epidural analgesia but only 51(32%) have a written policy covering its use. Anesthetists or intensivists with an anesthetic background sited all epidural catheters; 68% of units would not site an epidural in a patient with positive blood cultures; but only 52% considered culture negative sepsis (systemic signs of sepsis with no organism isolated) to be a contraindication. Neither lack of consent nor the need for anticoagulation after the catheter had been sited were considered contraindications to inserting an epidural catheter by the majority of respondents. Although 71% of the units would remove an epidural catheter if a patient developed positive blood cultures after it had been sited, the majority of the ICUs did not consider culture negative sepsis and the need for anticoagulation contraindications to maintain a previously sited epidural. CONCLUSIONS: Practice varied considerably with little consensus. Although all the respondents use epidural analgesia in critically ill patients, the indications and contraindications to epidural analgesia remain controversial, and further research is required to help define the role of epidural analgesia in this high-risk group.     

Clinical practices of analgesia for invasive procedures in critically ill sedated patients in Ile-de-France: a phone survey

To assess the practice of analgesia for invasive procedures in critically ill sedated patient in Ile-de-France (French area including Paris). Observational study: phone survey using a standard questionnaire. Only one senior physician in each of 30 intensive care unit (ICU) was questioned. Baseline sedation included systematic analgesia with narcotics in all ICUs. Only 4 physicians declared using a specific pain scale for sedated patients. Only 3 ICUs used written protocols. Procedures, which were thought to be most invasive (catheterization, pleural drainage, fibroscopy) were in most cases preceded by analgesia, but this was seldom the case for less painful events (venous or arterial puncture, tracheal suctioning). Specific pain scales are still underused. In contrast with current guidelines, analgesia for invasive procedures is not systematic but depends on subjective opinions.     

Coagulopathy and platelet disorders in critically ill patients

Coagulation disorders are common among intensive care patients and may range from isolated thrombocytopenia or prolonged global clotting tests to complex defects, such as disseminated intravascular coagulation. There are many causes for deranged coagulation in critically ill patients and each of these underlying disorders may require specific therapeutic management. Hence, a proper differential diagnosis and the initiation of adequate (supportive) treatment strategies are crucial to reduce morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients with coagulation abnormalities.     

Sleep disturbances in critically ill patients in ICU: how much do we know?

Sleep disturbances in the intensive care unit (ICU) seem to lead to development of delirium, prolonged ICU stay, and increased mortality. That is why sufficient sleep is important for good outcome and recovery in critically ill patients. A variety of small studies reveal pathological sleep patterns in critically ill patients including abnormal circadian rhythm, high arousal and awakening index, reduced Slow Wave Sleep, and Rapid Eye Movement sleep. The purpose of this study is to summarise different aspects of sleep-awake disturbances, causes and handling methods in critically ill patients by reviewing the underlying literature. There are no studies of level 1 evidence proving the positive impact of the tested interventions on the critically ill patients' sleep pattern. Thus, disturbed sleep in critically ill patients with all the severe consequences remains an unresolved problem and needs further investigation.     

Care of the critically ill patient

The care of critically ill patient within the intensive care unit requires a multidisciplinary approach. An understanding of the main principles of intensive care medicine is essential for surgeons, both for participating in the management of their own critically ill patients and also because surgical complications of critical care are well recognized. This article describes the main principles of intensive care medicine within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, giving an overview of a systematic approach to assessment and treatment of organ dysfunction, and highlights some of the complex ethical and organizational challenges.     

Management of critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes:The need for personalised therapy

Critical illness in patients with pre-existing diabetes frequently causes deterioration in glycaemic control.Despite the prevalence of diabetes in patients admitted to hospital and intensive care units,the ideal management of hyperglycaemia in these groups is uncertain.There are data that suggest that acute hyperglycaemia in critically ill patients without diabetes is associated with increased mortality and morbidity.Exogenous insulin to keep blood glucose concentrations 10 mmol/L is accepted as standard of care in this group.However,preliminary data have recently been reported that suggest that chronic hyperglycaemia may result in conditioning,which protects these patients against damage mediated by acute hyperglycaemia.Furthermore,acute glucose-lowering to 10 mmol/L in patients with diabetes with inadequate glycaemic control prior to their critical illness appears to have the capacity to cause harm.This review focuses on glycaemic control in critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes,the potential for harm from glucose-lowering and the rationale for personalised therapy.     

Is sufentanil suitable for long-term sedation of a critically ill patient?]

Sedation and analgesia are commonly practised in critically ill patients. The drugs and techniques used vary widely, however. Many reports have emphasized that analgesia has to be the primary goal in every therapeutic intervention in critically ill patients. The new narcotic sufentanil has been in use since 1987 in our intensive care unit. PATIENTS AND METHODS. Forty-nine patients in our ICU received sufentanil during controlled mechanical ventilation. The dose given was 0.75-1.0 micrograms.kg bw-1.h-1. In a second part of this study sufentanil was also administered to patients during the weaning period. The dose administered was 0.25-0.35 micrograms.kg bw-1.h-1. RESULTS. With sufentanil analgesia and sedation, most of our patients could be managed well; for only five patients the amount of sufentanil given was too small (Fig. 1). Sufentanil did not show any negative influence on haemodynamic variables, such as heart rate and mean arterial pressure; in addition, serum cortisol levels were not decreased (all values within normal range; Fig. 2); during the weaning phase sufentanil 0.25-0.35 micrograms/kg also proved to be excellent; paCO2 levels did not show any tendency to increase to abnormal levels (Fig. 3). CONCLUSIONS. Analgesia and sedation with sufentanil proved to be satisfactory in critically ill patients. In a dose range of 0.75-1.0 micrograms.kg bw-1.h-1 this drug can safely be given to patients undergoing controlled mechanical ventilation. Caution is necessary in hypovolaemic patients, in whom hypotension can occur if sufentanil is administered in the recommended dose. Sufentanil in a dose range between 0.25-0.35 micrograms.kg bw-1.h-1 is safe when given to patients during the weaning period.     

Importance of prevention of acute mucosal lesions in patients in intensive care units

At least three-quarters of critically ill patients develop mucosal lesion as a direct consequence of stress within the first 24 hours following the admission to intensive care unit. These mucosal lesions occur as superficial or deep mucosal lesions which can lead to massive gastrointestinal bleeding and it can put at risk the life of critically ill patient. There are multiple risk factors for the occurence of mucosal lesion such as: respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, sepsis, hypotension, bums, severe trauma, neurotrauma, ileus, coagulopathy, renal and hepatic failure, myocardial infarction etc. The incidence of silent (ocult) bleeding in critically ill patients is almost 100%, but only about 5% of patients have clinically apparent (overt) hemorrhage and 1-2% have clinically significant bleeding which requires blood transfusions. In patients who are at the greatest risk of developing mucosal lesion, prophylactic treatment ought to be started immediately in order to achieve pH4 with adequate perfusion and coagulation. Today several groups of medications are used for the prevention of mucosal gastrointestinal lesion and they include: antacids, sucralfate, hisamine-2 receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors.     

PATIENT MONITORING

Optimum results are obtained in the care of the critically ill patient if efforts are directed to maintaining the internal environment in a state as near normal as possible. This cannot be done without the use of basic monitoring procedures. Complex investigations may have a legitimate and necessary role as research tools. There is, however, a real risk of complex procedures becoming an end in themselves in general intensive therapy units, where they are apt to distract overworked nurses and medical attendants f r o m the care of their patients. It is important, therefore, for clearcut indications f o r various monitoring procedures to be defined, and in this paper an attempt has been made to outline a logical approach to the monitoring of critical 131 ill general surgical patients admitted to intensive therapy units.     

An assessment of the validity of SOFA score based triage in H1N1 critically ill patients during an influenza pandemic

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score based triage of influenza A H1N1 critically ill patients has been proposed for surge capacity management as a guide for clinical decision making. We conducted a retrospective records review and SOFA scoring of critically ill patients with influenza A H1N1 in a mixed medical-surgical intensive care unit in an urban hospital. Eight critically ill patients with influenza A H1N1 were admitted to the intensive care unit. Their mean (range) age was 39 (26–52) years with a length of stay of 11 (3–17) days. All patients met SOFA score based triage admission criteria with a modal SOFA score of five. Five patients required invasive ventilation for a mean (range) of 5 (4–11) days. Five patients would have been considered for withdrawal of treatment using SOFA scoring guidelines at 48 h. All patients survived. We conclude that SOFA score based triage could lead to withdrawal of life support in critically ill patients who could survive with an acceptably low length of stay in the intensive care unit.     

Critically ill children in non-paediatric intensive care units: a survey, review and proposal for practice

Despite strong arguments in favour of centralising care of critically ill children to paediatric intensive care units, around 2000 children per year are cared for in non-paediatric intensive care units in Australia and New Zealand. This paper reports a survey of consultants from 13 such units that admitted over 50 children in 2002 and 2003, to find out what factors affect the decision to keep critically ill children locally or transfer them to a paediatric intensive care unit and what infrastructure existed to support local care of these children. The results of this survey form the basis for a proposal to improve care of critically ill children in the non-paediatric intensive care units. The four key elements of this proposal are: the use of protocols, routine consultation with the regional paediatric intensive care unit, the use of telemedicine, and enhancing skills and experience of local staff Evidence supporting these measures as well as the evidence for centralising care of critically ill children is reviewed.     

Nutrition in critical care

Critical care has evolved from a prolonged recovery room stay for cardiac surgery patients to a full medical and nursing specialty in the last 5 decades. The ability to feed patients who cannot eat has evolved from impossible to routine clinical practice in the last 4 decades. Nutrition in critically ill patients based on measurement of metabolism has evolved from a research activity to clinical practice in the last 3 decades. The authors have been involved in this evolution and this article discusses past, present, and likely future practices in nutrition in critically ill patients.     

Airway challenges in critical care

Airway management in the intensive care unit is more problematic than during anaesthesia. In general, critically ill patients have less physiological reserve and complications are more common, both during the initial airway intervention (which includes risks associated with induction of anaesthesia), and later once the airway has been secured. Despite these known risks, those managing the airway of a critically ill patient, particularly out of hours, may be relatively inexperienced. Solutions to these challenging airway problems include: recognition of those patients with a potential airway problem; implementation of a plan to deal with their airway; immediate availability of a difficult airway trolley; use of capnography for every airway intervention and continuously in all ventilator-dependent patients; and appropriate training of all intensive care unit staff including use of simulation.     

The patient-at-risk team: identifying and managing seriously ill ward patients

A 'patient-at-risk team', established to allow the early identification of seriously ill patients on hospital wards, made 69 assessments on 63 patients over 6 months. Predefined physiological criteria were not able to reliably predict which patients would be admitted to the intensive care unit. The incidence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation before intensive care admission was 3.6% for patients seen by the team and 30.4% for those not seen (p < 0.005). Of admissions seen by the team, 25% died on the intensive care unit compared with 45% of those not seen (not significant, p = 0.07). Among those not seen by the team, mortality was 40% for those who did not require resuscitation and 57% for those who did (not significant). Many critically ill ward patients had abnormal physiological values before intensive care unit admission. Identification of critically ill patients on the ward and early advice and active management are likely to prevent the need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and to improve outcome.