Reoperation for a Starr-Edwards aortic valve implanted 28 years earlier

A 56-year-old man admitted with dyspnea had undergone aortic valve replacement using a Starr-Edwards ball valve to treat aortic regurgitation 28 years earlier. Chest radiography showed moderate cardiomegaly, moderate pulmonary edema, and mild pleural effusion. Echocardiographic examination showed severe mitral regurgitation. The mitral valve was replaced using a St. Jude Medical prosthesis, and the Starr-Edwards aortic valve was replaced using a CarboMedics prosthetic valve. The cloth covering on the Starr-Edwards valve had worn away and pannus had formed. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful, and he was discharged on postoperative day 35.     

Reoperation for a patient with starr-edwards aortic valve malfunction due to pannus formation twenty-nine years after implantation

We report a re-do case of severe aortic valve stenosis due to pannus formation 29 years after an aortic Starr-Edwards caged-ball valve implantation. A huge shelf of calcified and thick pannus tissue below the valve had reduced the already small orifice by at least a third in surface area. The explanted Starr-Edwards valve revealed no mechanical or structural failure. Early detection and treatment of pannus outgrowth is essential in order to prevent life-threatening prosthetic valve malfunctions.     

Selection of prosthetic aortic valve and root replacement in patients younger than age 30 years

Objective

Long-term outcomes of prosthetic aortic valve/root replacement in patients aged 30 years or younger are not well understood. We report our single institutional experience in this young cohort.

Aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation of the edwards SAPIENtm valve

Abstract

Introduction. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is established as an attractive treatment option for high-risk patients with aortic valve stenosis. One concern is the high risk of prosthetic valve regurgitation. This study aimed to examine for potential preoperative risk factors for postprocedural transcatheter heart valve regurgitation and to quantify the risk, degree, and consequences of postprocedural regurgitation. Materials and methods. 100 consecutive patients who underwent femoral (n = 22) or transapical (n = 78) TAVI were retrospectively reviewed. Echocardiographic valve regurgitation and clinical parameters were analyzed over the first year after TAVI. Results. Seventy-five percent of all patients had prosthetic valve regurgitation. It was, however, only mild or absent in 64% of patients and did not require re-intervention in any of the patients in the series. The severity of the regurgitation appeared unchanged over the one-year follow-up period. Moderate to severe regurgitation was associated with significant yet stable dilatation of the left ventricle over one year and lesser NYHA class improvement three months after TAVI. Asymmetrical native valve calcification increased the risk of paravalvular regurgitation non-significantly. Conclusion. Transcatheter heart valve regurgitation seems to be mild in the majority of cases and unchanged over a 12 months follow-up period. While affecting left ventricular dimensions in moderate or severe cases, we observed no obvious undesirable consequences of the prosthetic valve regurgitation within the first year.     

Endocarditis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement; a new nightmare in cardiac surgery

Treatment of prosthetic valve endocarditis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains challenging. An increase in TAVR endocarditis is inevitable, especially with the extension of indications and implantation in low‐risk patients. We present a case of complex surgical treatment of prosthetic valve endocarditis after TAVR.     

Triple-valve treatment for prosthetic valve endocarditis occurring 20 years after implantation of a Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in the aortic valve

A 68-year-old woman had undergone aortic valve replacement and open commissurotomy 20 years previously. At the beginning of 2008, fever, cold, and heart failure symptoms were noted. On blood culture, Streptococcus oralis was detected three times. Surgery was performed under a diagnoses of prosthetic valve endocarditis in the aortic valve, mitral stenosis and insufficiency, and tricuspid insufficiency. Techniques consisted of additional aortic valve replacement, mitral valve replacement, and tricuspid annuloplasty. Vegetation was macroscopically and pathologically observed in the extirpated Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis that had been placed in the aortic valve. There was no postoperative recurrent inflammatory response. The patient was discharged 32 days after surgery.     

Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation; the initial 50 patients

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of minimally invasive transapical beating heart aortic valve implantation (TAP-AVI) for high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. METHODS: TAP-AVI was performed via a small anterolateral minithoracotomy in 50 patients from February 2006 to March 2007. A balloon expandable transcatheter xenograft (Edwards SAPIEN THV, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) was used. Mean age was 82.4+/-5 years and 39 (78%) were female. Implantation was performed in a hybrid operative theatre using fluoroscopic and echocardiographic visualization. Average EuroSCORE predicted risk for mortality was 27.6+/-12%. Seven (14%) patients were re-operations with patent bypass grafts. RESULTS: TAP-AVI (13 patients 23 mm and 37 patients 26 mm) was successfully performed on the beating heart under temporary rapid ventricular pacing in 47 (94%) patients, and implantation was performed completely off-pump in 34 (68%) patients. Three patients required early conversion; two of them were successfully discharged. There was no prosthesis migration or embolization observed. Echocardiography revealed good hemodynamic function in all and minor incompetence in 23 patients, mostly paravalvular, without any signs of hemolysis. Mortality was due to the overall health condition and non-valve related in all patients. Actuarial survival at 1 month, 6 months and 1 year was 92+/-3.8%, 73.9+/-6.2% and 71.4+/-6.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation is feasible using an off-pump technique. Good results have been achieved in the initial 50 patients, especially when considering the overall high-risk profile of these patients.     

Use of the Bentall method for replacement of an aortic Starr-Edwards ball valve prosthesis implanted 32 years previously

We report the case of a 54-year-old woman who, 32 years previously, had undergone replacement of the ascending aorta by the inclusion method with a Starr-Edwards ball valve prosthesis and recently underwent aortic root re-reconstruction by the Bentall method. Routine chest radiography revealed dilatation of the mediastinum, and computed tomography revealed an aneurysm of the ascending aorta. At reoperation, although the cloth covering the cage of the Starr-Edwards ball valve prosthesis appeared worn and some pannus formation was seen, the Starr-Edwards ball valve was functioning normally. The aortic root was replaced with a composite graft that consisted of a 23-mm St. Jude bileaflet prosthesis and a 24-mm Hemashield gold graft. The patient was discharged from the hospital in good condition 25 days after surgery.     

Successful implantation of self-expanding valve for a failed stentless prosthesis

Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation is currently used for failed bioprosthesis. The use of a transcatheter prosthesis in a regurgitant noncalcified root implanted Medtronic Freestyle prosthesis is particularly challenging. We present a successful transaxillary valve-in-valve implantation of a self-expandable transcatheter aortic valve prosthesis in a failed Freestyle bioprothesis implanted eleven years earlier. Tips and tricks are discussed.     

Successful redo aortic valve replacement using Perceval for multiple recurrent prosthetic valve dysfunction

A 50-year-old man who required aortic valve replacement (AVR) 3 times for severe paravalvular leakage (PVL) was diagnosed with a recurrence of severe PVL. Since the PVL recurred each time because of prosthetic valve detachment from the annulus, a fourth AVR was performed using a self-expanding sutureless valve. Postoperative echocardiography showed no significant PVL. The patient was discharged without any complications and returned to normal work soon after. In cases such as our patient, sutureless AVR could be a powerful alternative to conventional AVR.     

Aortic dissection late after aortic valve replacement

We experienced 3 cases of an aortic dissection occurring late after an aortic valve replacement, and sucessfully treated by an aortic root replacement. An aortic dissection involving the ascending aorta can develop late after an aortic valve replacement, and such an occurrence is associated with a high mortality and morbidity. The development of effective surgical strategies at the initial aortic valve surgery, strict control of blood pressure after aortic valve replacement, serial evaluations of aortic size, and the prophylactic replacement of the ascending aorta for patients with aortic dilatation after aortic valve replacement, all play clinically important roles in preventing an aortic dissection after aortic valve replacement. When an aortic dissection occurs in patients with a previous aortic valve replacement, an aortic root replacement should be performed in order to avoid leaving the fragile diseased aortic wall including the sinus of Valsalva.     

Surgically treated aortic root aneurysm following aortic valve replacement

A 65-year-old man with aortic regurgitation underwent aortic valve replacement with a St. Jude Medical prosthetic valve about 6 years ago. At that time, the aortic root was slightly dilated at about 40 mm in diameter and the ascending aorta was within the normal range. This year, the man was diagnosed with an aortic root aneurysm in regular follow-up echocardiography. Chest-enhanced computed tomography and chest aortography at our hospital demonstrated a pear-like aortic root aneurysm about 60 mm in diameter. Elective operation for the aortic root aneurysm was conducted September 29, 1999, based on the Bentall procedure. Composite graft replacement with coronary reconstruction was conducted using a 28-mm Hemashield prosthetic graft and a 23-mm St. Jude Medical prosthetic valve under cardiopulmonary bypass. An 8-mm Hemashield graft was interposed on the left main coronary artery and the right coronary artery was directly anastomosed using a Carrel patch method. The postoperative course was uneventful and post-operative examination demonstrated good surgical results. Histological findings of the aortic aneurysm wall showed cystic medial necrosis. Surgical cases of aortic root aneurysm after aortic valve replacement are rare, but serious complications with the possibility of rupture or dissection warrant surgical intervention.     

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement as a bridge to surgical aortic valve replacement in a younger patient with extremely high surgical risk

A 50‐year‐old man with decompensated aortic stenosis displayed significantly reduced ejection fraction, an ascending aortic aneurysm (55 mm in diameter), and bilateral giant bullae, and was evaluated as having extremely high surgical risk. Therefore, as a bridge to definitive treatment, he simultaneously underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and upper left lung lobectomy. His heart function recovered 6 months later and he underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and graft replacement of the ascending aorta. TAVR may serve as a bridge procedure before SAVR for aortic stenosis in younger patients with high surgical risk.     

Trans-catheter aortic valve implantation after previous aortic homograft surgery

In patients with previous heart surgery, the operative risk is elevated during conventional aortic valve re-operations. Trans-catheter aortic valve implantation is a new method for the treatment of high-risk patients. Nevertheless, this new procedure carries potential risks in patients with previous homograft implantation in aortic position. Between April 2008 and February 2011, 345 consecutive patients (mean EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation): 38 ± 20%; mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Mortality Score: 19 ± 16%; mean age: 80 ± 8 years; 111 men and 234 women) underwent trans-apical aortic valve implantation. In three patients, previous aortic homograft implantation had been performed. Homograft degeneration causing combined valve stenosis and incompetence made re-operation necessary. In all three patients, the aortic valve could be implanted using the trans-apical approach, and the procedure was successful. In two patients, there was slight paravalvular leakage of the aortic prosthesis and the other patient had slight central leakage. Neither ostium obstruction nor mitral valve damage was observed. Trans-catheter valve implantation can be performed successfully after previous homograft implantation. Particular care should be taken to achieve optimal valve positioning, not to obstruct the ostium of the coronary vessels due to the changed anatomic situation and not to cause annulus rupture.