Clinical fate of branch duct and mixed forms of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia of the pancreas

Aims:  The aim of the present study was to assess the clinical fate of, and to gain new insights into, branch duct and mixed (predominantly main duct type) forms of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia of the pancreas (IPMN).
Methods:  During a 17-year period, 99 successive IPMN patients (52 men, 47 women; mean age, 64 years) were included and divided into two groups for further comparison: one group had branch duct IPMN, whereas the other had mixed IPMN.
Results:  Patients from the mixed IPMN group ( n  = 52) displayed a greater rate of symptoms (83% vs 55%, P  = 0.004), pancreatic resection (67% vs 38%, P  = 0.007), malignancy (35% vs 13%, P  = 0.017) and death (15% vs 4%, P  = 0.09) than those from the branch duct IPMN group. A 38-month follow up of non-operated, symptom-free patients confirmed that more than 85% of branch duct IPMN patients were asymptomatic without evidence of malignancy. Borderline lesions and carcinoma are found in up to 50% of symptomatic resected branch duct IPMN cases.
Conclusion:  Patients with the mixed form of IPMN as well as with symptomatic branch duct IPMN should require pancreatic resection because of symptoms and the risk for malignancy. In silent branch duct IPMN without radiological signs of malignancy, a non-operative watch-and-wait strategy can be discussed.     

Management of intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: treatment strategy based on morphologic classification

GOALS: The aim of this study was to examine and clarify the preoperative markers that are useful for differentiating between benign and malignant lesions of intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) of the pancreas, grouped according to morphologic classification. BACKGROUND: There are various stages of pathology in IPMN, ranging from benign to malignant lesions. Although the determination of appropriate treatment guidelines to deal with IPMN is a critical issue, no such guidelines have been established. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty cases of IPMN were classified morphologically into either main or branch duct types. We compared the morphologic classification with histopathologic diagnosis using indicators of malignancy detected by imaging such as main duct diameter, the number and diameter of cysts, and the presence or absence of mural nodules. We also examined the usefulness of pancreatic juice cytology and measurement of telomerase activity as indicators of malignancy. Finally, we performed a survival analysis on the basis of morphologic classification to determine prognosis of IPMN. RESULTS: Whereas a high incidence (64%) of malignant lesions was seen in main duct type IPMN, benign lesions were dominant (80.5%) in branch duct type IPMN. Survival analysis showed that the prognosis was significantly worse in main duct type than in branch duct type IPMN. The lesions were aggravated in all patients with main duct type who did not undergo resection, resulting in death due to progression of the pancreatic lesion. The incidence of mural nodules was a useful indicator in main duct type, whereas main duct diameter and incidence of mural nodules were useful indicators in branch duct type. Although pancreatic juice cytology showed a high accuracy rate with low sensitivity for determining malignancy, measurement of telomerase activity in this juice was very effective for differentiating between benign and malignant lesions. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of malignant lesions was extremely high in main duct type IPMN, indicating that surgery is required in all these patients. However, to determine whether surgery is indicated in branch duct type IPMN it is necessary to obtain an appropriate image diagnosis focusing on main duct diameter and mural nodules and also to carry out cytology and measurement of telomerase activity in samples of pancreatic juice.     

Natural history of pancreatic cystic lesions: A multicenter prospective observational study for evaluating the risk of pancreatic cancer

Background and Aim

The aim of this study is to elucidate the natural history of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs), including branch duct‐type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (BD‐IPMN), via midterm follow‐up analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study (NSPINAL study).

Methods

From July 2011 to October 2016, 881 patients with PCLs were enrolled in NSPINAL study, and 664 patients with > 12 months of follow up were analyzed. Every patient was asymptomatic, and endoscopic ultrasound was performed at the initial diagnosis to exclude high‐risk individuals. Follow up included endoscopic ultrasound, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging at least once a year. Serial morphological changes and the pancreatic cancer (PC) incidence, including malignant progression of PCLs, were evaluated.

Results

The 664 patients (358 men) were followed for a median of 33.5 months (interquartile range 29). The cyst and main pancreatic duct sizes were 16.6 ± 9.3 and 2.3 ± 1.0 mm, respectively. Morphologically, 518 cases were multilocular, 137 were unilocular, and 9 had a honeycomb pattern; 269 cases involved multifocal lesions. Ninety‐six patients (14.5%) showed worsening progression on imaging. There were two resectable and four unresectable cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and three cases of malignant BD‐IPMN. The 3‐year risk of developing PC was 1.2%. The standardized incidence ratio for PC among PCLs was 10.0 (95% confidence interval 3.5–16.5), and the standardized incidence ratio among BD‐IPMN was 16.6 (95% confidence interval 5.1–28.1). Multivariate analysis showed that development of symptoms and worsening progression were significant predictors of PC.

Conclusions

Malignant progression of PCLs, including PC development, is not uncommon. Patients with PCLs should be carefully monitored to detect pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma at early stages.     

A case of metachronous invasive ductal carcinoma concomitant with intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas, which could not be detected in contrast-enhanced CT scan performed 3 months ago

A 61-year-old man had been followed up in another hospital under diagnosis of branch duct type IPMN for 4 years. Contrast-enhanced CT scan for regular check performed 3 months ago revealed no increase of IPMN and no pancreatic tumor. However, he complained of back pain after that, MRI was performed. It revealed a solid tumor in size of 25mm diameter at the head of pancreas. The tumor was apparent from IPMN in several imaging modalities. Pancreatoduodenectomy was performed under diagnosis of invasive ductal carcinoma concomitant with IPMN. Post-operative pathological findings revealed IPMN was adenoma with mild atypia, and solid tumor was diagnosed invasive ductal carcinoma with solitary minute liver metastasis.     

MANAGEMENT OF INTRADUCTAL PAPILLARY MUCINOUS NEOPLASM OF THE PANCREAS

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas (IPMNs) consist of main duct (MD) type and branch duct (BD) type. The authors describe their way of thinking regarding diagnostic modalities and management for BD type IPMNs. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS) provide high resolution images of main and branch pancreatic ducts. The cases with nodules demonstrated by EUS and/or IDUS regardless of the size are the indication of operation. There were 235 cases with BD type IPMN who underwent EUS and IDUS between April 1991 and June 2005. A total of 94 patients underwent surgical resection and were histopathologically diagnosed (carcinoma, 10 cases; adenoma, 64 cases; hyperplasia, 20 cases). Diagnoses of 79 cases with nodules detected by EUS or IDUS preoperatively were 10 carcinomas, 61 adenomas and eight hyperplasias. Diagnoses of 15 cases without nodules but with symptoms were three adenomas, 12 hyperplasias and no carcinoma. The authors think that the combination of EUS and IDUS is the best way for diagnosing BD type IPMNs in the present state.     

LATERAL SPREAD ALONG THE MAIN PANCREATIC DUCT IN BRANCH‐DUCT INTRADUCTAL PAPILLARY‐MUCINOUS NEOPLASMS OF THE PANCREAS: USEFULNESS OF INTRADUCTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY FOR ITS EVALUATION

Background: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) of the pancreas tend to spread intraepithelially along the pancreatic duct wall. We evaluated histopathological intraductal lateral spread (LS) along the main pancreatic duct (MPD) from branch‐duct IPMN and investigated the usefulness of intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS) for its preoperative diagnosis. Patients and Methods: Twenty‐four patients with branch‐duct IPMN who had undergone preoperative IDUS and surgery were reviewed clinicopathologically. The prevalence and histological length of LS along the MPD from branch‐duct IPMN, characteristics of the patients with LS, and efficacy of LS assessment by IDUS were examined. Results: LS along the MPD was observed in 54% of the subjects. In the group of patients with LS, its mean length was 25.2 ± 16.8 mm (5–50 mm) and the diameter of the MPD was 6 mm or greater. Of the patients with LS, those in whom the length of LS along the MPD was longer than the diameter of the cystically dilated branch accounted for 30%. The diameter of the MPD in the group with LS was significantly greater than that in the group without LS (P = 0.03). The sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of IDUS in the detection of LS were 92%, 91%, and 92%, respectively. Conclusion: LS along the MPD was detected in about half of the resected cases of branch‐duct IPMN. Preoperative transpapillary IDUS may be beneficial for the determination of the resection line, especially in those branch‐duct IPMN patients in whom the MPD is 6 mm or greater in diameter.     

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas and IgG4-related disease: A coincidental association

Background/aimsCoexistence of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and pancreatic cancer, elevation of serum IgG4 levels in pancreatic cancer patients, and infiltration of IgG4-positive plasma cells in peritumorous pancreatitis have been described in a few reports. This study examined the relationship between intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas and peritumorous IgG4-positive lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates.MethodsSerum IgG4 levels were measured in 54 patients with IPMN (median 70 years, 26 males and 28 females; 13 main duct type and 41 branch duct type). Histological findings focusing on dense lymphoplasmacytic infiltration, storiform fibrosis, and obliterative phlebitis were reviewed, and immunostaining with IgG4 and IgG was performed in 23 surgically resected IPMN cases (18 main duct type and 5 branch duct type). The presence of IgG4-positive plasma cells >10/hpf and an IgG4-positive/IgG-positive plasma cell ratio >40% were considered significant.ResultsSerum IgG4 levels were elevated in 2 (4%) IPMN patients. Significant infiltration of IgG4-positive plasma cells was detected in 4 IPMN cases (17%). The IgG4-positive/IgG-positive plasma cell ratio was >40% in all 4 cases. In one case with a markedly elevated serum IgG4 level (624 mg/dL), typical lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (AIP type 1) lesions surrounded the whole IPMN. In the 3 other cases, infiltration of IgG4-positive plasma cells with fibrosis was focally detected mainly in the periductal area around the IPMN.ConclusionsIn a few patients with IPMNs, IgG4-positive plasma cell infiltration can occur in the peritumorous area. The association of an IPMN with AIP type 1-like changes seems to be exceptional and coincidental.     

Experience of limited pancreatic head resection for management of branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm in a single center

AIM： To share our surgical experience and the outcome of limited pancreatic head resection for the management of branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm （IPMN）.
METHODS： Between May 2005 and February 2008, nine limited pancreatic head resections （LPHR） were performed for IPMN of the pancreatic head. We reviewed the nine patients, retrospectively.
RESULTS： Tumor was located in the uncinate process of the pancreas in all nine patients. Three patients had stents inserted in the main pancreatic duct due to inju- ry. The mean size of tumor was 28.4 mm. Postoperative complications were found in five patients： 3 pancreatic leakages, a pancreatitis, and a duodenal stricture. Pancreatic leakages were improved by external drainage. No perioperative mortality was observed and all patients are recorded alive during the mean follow-up period of 17.2 mo.
CONCLUSION： In selected patients after careful evaluation, LPHR can be used for the treatment of branch duct type IPMN. In order to avoid pancreatic ductal injury, pre- and intra-operative definite localization and careful operative techniques are required.     

Clinical aspects of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is a spectrum of neoplasia in the pancreatic duct epithelium characterized by cystic dilation of the main and/or branch pancreatic duct. According to the site of involvement IPMNs are classified into three categories, i.e., main duct type, branch duct type, and combined type. Most branch duct IPMNs are benign, whereas the other two types are often malignant. A large size of branch duct IPMN and marked dilation of the main pancreatic duct indicate the presence of adenoma at least. The additional existence of large mural nodules increases the possibility of malignancy in all types. Of recent interest is the relatively high prevalence of synchronous and/or metachronous malignancy in various organs, including the pancreas. The prognosis is favorable after complete resection of benign and noninvasive malignant IPMNs. Malignant IPMNs acquiring aggressiveness after parenchymal invasion necessitate adequate lymph node dissection. On the other hand, asymptomatic branch duct IPMNs without mural nodules can be observed without resection for a considerably long time. This review addresses available data, current understanding, controversy, and future directions.     

Small invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas distinct from branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is a highly sensitive diagnostic method for the detection of small pancreatic carcinomas.Recently, there have been some reports describing the utility of contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CEH-EUS) which uses sonographic contrast agent for differentiation of a pancreatic mass.This report describes a case of small adenocarcinoma of the pancreas distinct from branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) in which investigation by EUS took place every 6 mo and diagnosis was made accurately by additional CEH-EUS during the followup of the branch duct IPMN.A 68-year-old female was admitted to our hospital because of a branch duct IPMN in the pancreatic body.She had been followedup by EUS every 6 mo.However, after 2 years EUS demonstrated a low echoic area distinct from the branch duct IPMN which was vaguely discernible by EUS, and accurate sizing and differential diagnosis were considered difficult on the EUS imaging.CHEUS with Sonazoid revealed a hypovascular tumor and we suspected small pancreatic carcinoma.The histopathological diagnosis was adenocarcinoma (10 mm) in the pancreatic tail, distinct from the branch duct IPMN of the pancreatic body.EUS and CEH-EUS may play an important role in the correct diagnosis of small pancreatic tumors, including synchronous and metachronous occurrence of IPMN and ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.     

Outcomes of nonresected main-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas

AIM:To compare characteristics and outcomes of resected and nonresected main-duct and mixed intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas(IPMN).METHODS:Over a 14-year period,50 patients who did not undergo surgery for resectable main-duct or mixed IPMN,for reasons of precluding comorbidities,age and/or refusal,were compared with 74 patients who underwent resection to assess differences in rates of survival,recurrence/occurrence of malignancy,and prognostic factors.All study participants had dilatation of the main pancreatic duct by ≥ 5 mm,with or without dilatation of the branch ducts.Some of the nonsurgical patients showed evidence of mucus upon perendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or endoscopic ultrasound and/or after fine needle aspiration.For the surgical patients,pathologic analysis of resected specimens confirmed a diagnosis of IPMN with involvement of the main pancreatic duct or of both branch ducts as well as the main pancreatic duct.Clinical and biologic follow-ups were conducted for all patients at least annually,through hospitalization or consultation every six months during the first year of follow-up,together with abdominal imaging analysis(magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography or computed tomography) and,if necessary,endoscopic ultrasound with or without fine needle aspiration.RESULTS:The overall five-year survival rate of patients who underwent resection was significantly greater than that for the nonsurgical patients(74% vs 58%; P =0.019).The parameters of age(< 70 years) and absence of a nodule were associated with better survival(P < 0.05); however,the parameters of main pancreatic duct diameter > 10 mm,branch ductdiameter > 30 mm,or presence of extra pancreatic cancers did not significantly influence the prognosis.In the nonsurgical patients,pancreatic malignancy occurred in 36% of cases within a mean time of 33 mo(median:29 mo; range:8-141 mo).Comparison of the nonsurgical patients who experienced disease progression with those who did not progress showed no significant differences in age,sex,symptoms,subtype of IPMN,or follow-up period; only the size of the main pancreatic duct was significantly different between these two sub-groups,with the nonsurgical patients who experienced progression showing a greater diameter at the time of diagnosis(> 10 mm).CONCLUSION:Patients unfit for surgery have a 36% greater risk of developing pancreatic malignancy of the main-duct or mixed IPMN within a median of 2.5 years.     

The distance of tumor spread in the main pancreatic duct of an intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm: where to resect and how to predict it

Background

The surgical decision regarding where to resect the pancreas is an important judgement that is directly linked to the surgical procedure. An appropriate surgical margin to resect intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas based on the distance of tumor spread (DTS) in the main pancreatic duct has not been adequately documented. We analyzed the appropriate surgical margin based on the DTS in the main pancreatic duct of IPMN and the positive rate at the pancreatic cut end margin.

Methods

Forty patients with main duct- or mixed-type IPMN diagnosed histopathologically who underwent surgery at Tokai University Hospital between 1991 and 2008 were retrospectively analyzed. The resection line was determined to achieve a 2-cm surgical margin in patients with main duct- or mixed-type IPMN and as limited a resection as possible to remove the dilated branch duct in patients with branch duct-type IPMN according to macroscopic type. The dysplastic state of the epithelium was judged as positive for carcinoma in situ (high-grade dysplasia) or adenoma (very low to moderate dysplasia) and judged as negative for hyperplasia or normal.

Results

The mean DTS in the main pancreatic duct was 41.6 ± 30.0 mm, and that of the distance of tumor absence was 13.6 ± 12.4 mm. The positive rate at the pancreatic cut end margin in frozen sections was 29.7%. The final positive rate at the pancreatic cut end margin was 26.2%. There has been no evidence of local recurrence in the remnant pancreas. DTS in the main pancreatic duct of IPMN was correlated with the maximum diameter of the duct (R = 0.678).

Conclusion

Distance of tumor spread offered important insights about the appropriate site to resect the pancreas and the positive rate at the cut end margin in IPMN.     

Cyst fluid SPINK1 may help to differentiate benign and potentially malignant cystic pancreatic lesions

ObjectiveDifferential diagnosis between benign and potentially malignant cystic pancreatic lesions may be difficult. Previously we have compared cyst fluid serine protease inhibitor Kazal type I (SPINK1) with some traditionally used tumour markers (amylase, CEA, Ca19-9) and found that it may be a new promising maker in the differential diagnosis of cystic pancreatic lesions. In the present study, we focused on cyst fluid SPINK1 levels in benign and potentially malignant cystic pancreatic lesions.DesignSixty-one patients operated on for cystic pancreatic lesion in Tampere University Hospital, Finland and in Verona University Hospital, Italy, were included. Cyst fluid was aspirated during surgery, stored at ?70 °C, and analysed with immunofluorometric assay for SPINK1. The final diagnosis was acute pancreatitis with fluid collection (Acute FC) in 4 patients, chronic pseudocyst (PS) in 17 patients, serous cystadenoma (SCA) in 7 patients, mucinous cystadenoma (MCA) in 21 patients and intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) in 12 patients (9 main/mixed duct type and 3 branch duct type).ResultsThe acute FC patients had high SPINK1 levels. Among chronic cysts, SPINK1 levels were significantly higher in patients with potentially malignant cysts (main/mixed duct IPMN and MCA) than with benign cysts (side branch IPMN and SCA), (median and range, [480 (13–3602) vs. 18 (0.1–278) μg/L]; p < 0.0001). In the subcohort of 24 patients with <3 cm chronic cyst, cyst fluid SPINK 1 levels were significantly lower in SCA or side branch IPMN (3 [2–116] μg/L) than in main duct IPMN or MCA (638 [66–3602] μg/L; p = 0.018). The best sensitivity and specificity to differentiate any size MCA or main/mixed type IPMN from SCA or side branch IPMN were 85% and 84% (AUC 0.94; cut-off value 118 μg/L). The best sensitivity and specificity to differentiate <3 cm MCA or main duct IPMN from SCA or side branch IPMN were 93% and 89% (AUC 0.98; cut-off value 146 μg/L).ConclusionsCyst fluid SPINK1 may be a possible marker in the differential diagnosis of benign and potentially malignant cystic pancreatic lesions.     

COMPARISON OF THE HEIGHT OF PAPILLARY TUMOR IN INTRADUCTAL PAPILLARY MUCINOUS NEOPLASM OF THE PANCREAS BETWEEN MEASURED PREOPERATIVE IMAGES AND RESECTED MATERIAL

The height of the mural nodules and papillary tumors in main pancreatic duct or dilated branch duct is the most important factor for diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). In this study, the authors compared the height of the papillary lesions and mural nodules between the height of resected tissues and the height detected by the preoperative imaging tools (endoscopic ultrasonography [EUS] and intraductal ultrasonography [IDUS]) in 38 patients with IPMN. In 21 out of 23 cases of adenoma, and in cases with the non‐invasive cancer, the difference of the height of operative and preoperative analysis measured by EUS and IDUS was within 1–2 mm. EUS and IDUS are useful for diagnosis of degree of malignancy in IPMN.     

Management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas is a distinct entity characterized by papillary proliferations of mucin-producing epithelial cells with excessive mucus production and cystic dilatation of the pancreatic ducts. IPMNs have malignant potential and exhibit a broad histologic spectrum, ranging from adenoma to invasive carcinoma. IPMNs are classified into main duct and branch duct types, based on the site of tumor involvement. IPMN patients have a favorable prognosis if appropriately treated. The postoperative 5-year survival rate is nearly 100% for benign tumors and noninvasive carcinoma, and approximately 60% for invasive carcinoma. A main duct type IPMN should be resected. Surgical treatment is indicated for a branch duct IPMN with suspected malignancy (tumor diameter ≥ 30 mm, mural nodules, dilated main pancreatic duct, or positive cytology) or positive symptoms. Malignant IPMNs necessitate lymph node dissection (D1). IPMNs are associated with a high incidence of extrapancreatic malignancies and pancreatic ductal carcinoma.     

ENDOSCOPIC DIAGNOSIS OF INTRADUCTAL PAPILLARY‐MUCINOUS NEOPLASM OF THE PANCREAS BY MEANS OF PERORAL PANCREATOSCOPY USING A SMALL‐DIAMETER VIDEOSCOPE AND NARROW‐BAND IMAGING

Background: Intraductal papillary‐mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is an intraductal tumor in which the mucin‐producing epithelium shows proliferated papillary and a wide variety of pathological changes ranging from hyperplasia to adenocarcinoma. Therefore, it is important to determine whether an IPMN is benign or malignant. In the present study of patients with IPMN, the protrusion was observed by a peroral pancreatoscopy (PPS) using a small‐diameter videoscope and narrow‐band imaging (NBI). We carried out the differential diagnosis of benign lesion to malignant lesion. Methods: Between April 2003 and May 2009, PPS using a small‐diameter videoscope by means of NBI was carried out on 21 hospitalized patients with IPMN (10 cases of adenocarcinoma, 11 cases of adenoma or hyperplasia; 14 males and seven females, with a mean age of 69.4 years). Results: Fifteen focal lesions of the 16 cases in the head of the pancreas (93.7%) and four focal lesions of the five cases in the pancreatic body (80%) were observable, whereas two lesions (adenocarcinoma in the pancreatic body, and adenoma in the uncus of pancreas) were not observable. Endoscopically, seven cases were classified as villous type and two cases as vegetative type, and nine cases were diagnosed as adenocarcinoma. Ten cases with sessile type or semipedunculated type were diagnosed as adenoma or hyperplasia. Vascular patterns and protrusions were detected more clearly in the NBI images than under white light observation. Conclusions: When combined with a videoscope and NBI, pancreatoscopy provided a clear image and was useful for evaluating whether the IPMN was benign or malignant.     

Imaging IPMN: take home messages and news

IPMN is a frequent disease involving pancreatic duct. This disease could be malignant (parenchymal invasive adenocarcinoma), particularly if the main pancreatic duct is involved (this involvement is considered present if > 6 mm), if this enlargement reaches 10 mm or more, and if the pathological phenotype is biliopancreatic or intestinal (malignancy is less frequent if gastric one). Invasiveness is suspected if hypodense parenchymal lesion is present, particularly near a cystical lesion or MPD, a mural nodule of the wall, or if MPD wall has got a contrast uptake. Mural nodules inside cystic branch duct are associated with in situ grade 3 malignancies. MPD IPMN must be resected to prevent malignancy. The follow-up of isolated branch duct cysts relies upon MDCT and MRI, every two years if lesion is less than 1cm. Every one year if bigger, particularly if more than to 3 cm.     

Size of mural nodule as an indicator of surgery for branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas during follow-up

Background

A mural nodule is a strong predictive factor for malignancy in branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas, but the nodule size has hardly been considered. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a mural nodule of 10?mm was appropriate as an indicator of surgery for IPMN during follow-up.

Methods

The follow-up outcomes of 100 patients who had branch duct IPMN without mural nodules or who had branch duct IPMN with mural nodules of less than 9?mm in a tertiary care setting were investigated retrospectively. The patients underwent abdominal ultrasound (US) every 3?months and additional imaging examinations or cytologic examination of pancreatic juice when necessary. Surgery was recommended to them when a mural nodule developed or when a nodule enlarged and reached 10?mm.

Results

During an average follow-up period of 97?months, branch duct IPMNs developed mural nodules that reached 10?mm in 5 patients (0.62% per year). In one patient the IPMN was revealed to be non-invasive carcinoma by resection, 1 IPMN was shown to be malignant by further follow-up, and 3 were not resected because of refusal or the patient??s age. In 7 patients, mural nodules stayed within 9?mm. The remaining 88 patients lacked mural nodules in their branch duct IPMNs throughout the follow-up. The occurrence of invasive carcinoma around the IPMN was not indicated by imaging examinations in any patient. Univariate analysis showed that the size of the cyst at baseline significantly predicted the development of a mural nodule that reached 10?mm during follow-up (P?=?0.05).

Conclusions

A mural nodule of 10?mm is appropriate as an indicator of surgery in the follow-up of branch duct IPMN.     

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: diagnosis and treatment

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is characterized by cystic dilatation of the main and/or branch pancreatic duct. Only one-third of all patients are symptomatic, and others are diagnosed by chance. IPMNs are classified into 3 types: main duct, branch duct, and mixed IPMN. Most branch-type IPMNs are benign, while the other 2 types are frequently malignant. The presence of large mural nodules increases the possibility of malignancy in all types. Presence of a large branch-type IPMN and marked dilatation of the main duct indicate, at the very least, the existence of adenoma. Ultrasonography, endosonography, and intraductal ultrasonography clearly demonstrate ductal dilatation and mural nodules, and magnetic resonance pancreatography best visualizes the entire outline of IPMN. Not infrequently, synchronous or metachronous malignancy develops in various organs, including the pancreas. Prognosis is excellent after complete resection of benign and noninvasive malignant IPMNs. Asymptomatic branch-type IPMNs without mural nodules may be followed up without resection. Malignant IPMNs displaying acquired aggressiveness after parenchymal invasion require adequate lymph node dissection. Total pancreatectomy is needed for some IPMNs; its benefits, however, must be balanced against operative and postoperative risks because most IPMNs are slow growing and affect elderly people, and prognosis is favorable for IPMN patients with even malignant neoplasms.     

Coexisting Type 1 Autoimmune Pancreatitis and Mixed-type Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm

An 84-year-old man was referred to our hospital for a cystic lesion of the pancreatic head, swelling of the pancreatic tail and hilar biliary stricture, resulting in elevated liver enzyme levels. We suspected branch duct-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) and type I autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) associated with sclerosing cholangitis because of the high serum IgG4 levels. The main pancreatic duct on the tail side of the AIP lesion was moderately dilated. Although the biliary stricture and pancreatic swelling improved after prednisolone treatment, the pancreatic enzyme levels increased rapidly. The entire main pancreatic duct exhibited remarkable dilatation, which led to the diagnosis of mixed-type IPMN. The clinical characteristics of IPMN in the main pancreatic duct appear to have been initially masked by AIP.