Clinical significance of the minor duodenal papilla and accessory pancreatic duct

The accessory pancreatic duct (APD) is the main drainage duct of the dorsal pancreatic bud in the embryo, entering the duodenum at the minor duodenal papilla (MIP). As development progresses, the duct of the dorsal bud undergoes varying degrees of atrophy at the duodenal end. In cases of patent APD, smooth-muscle fiber bundles derived from the duodenal proper muscular tunics surround the APD. The APD shows long and short patterns on pancreatography, and ductal fusion in the two types appears to differ embryologically. Patency of the APD in control cases, as determined by dye-injection endoscopic retrograde pancreatography, was 43%. Patency of the APD may depend on duct caliber, course, and terminal shape of the APD. A patent APD may prevent acute pancreatitis by reducing the pressure in the main pancreatic duct. Pancreas divisum is a common anatomical anomaly in which the ventral and dorsal pancreatic ducts do not unite embryologically. As the majority of exocrine flow is routed through the MIP in individuals with pancreas divisum, interrelationships between poor function of the MIP and increased flow of pancreatic juice caused by alcohol or diet may increase dorsal pancreatic duct pressure and lead to the development of pancreatitis. Wire-guided minor sphincterotomy, followed by dorsal duct stenting, is recommended for acute recurrent pancreatitis associated with pancreas divisum.     

Adenoma of the minor papilla associated with pancreas divisum

Tumors of the minor papilla of the duodenum are quite rare. We report the first documented case of an adenoma of the minor papilla complicating pancreas divisum. A 52-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital for treatment of an asymptomatic duodenal tumor detected by computed tomography scan. Endoscopy showed an 18-mm, whitish-colored, sessile mass located in the descending duodenum proximal to a normal appearing major papilla. Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography revealed divisum of the pancreas with dilatation of pancreatic duct ranged in the dorsal pancreas. Transduodenal minor papillectomy was performed because there is malignant potential of the tumor and the possibility of acute pancreatitis. The Santorini orifice was then re-approximated to the duodenal wall for protection against acute pancreatitis caused by scarring and stenosis of the duct orifice as a possible late complication. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful and she has been asymptomatic without evidence of tumor recurrence or stenosis of the Santorini orifice on endoscopic examination for the last 4 years.     

Use of methylene blue to identify the minor papilla or its orifice in patients with pancreas divisum

BACKGROUND: In some patients with pancreas divisum, minor papilla cannulation is difficult because of uncertain identification of the papilla or its orifice, even after pancreatic secretory stimulation with secretin or cholecystokinin agonist. METHODS: Two techniques with methylene blue were used to identify the minor papilla and its orifice more clearly in a series of patients: spraying methylene blue over duodenal mucosa in the region suspected to contain the minor papilla with/without secretin or cholecystokinin agonist administration, and injection of contrast medium containing methylene blue into the ventral pancreatic duct by means of the major papilla in cases of incomplete pancreas divisum. Results were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: From January 2001 to May 2002, minor papilla cannulation with conventional methods initially failed in 38 of 305 patients with pancreas divisum because of an inconspicuous minor papilla orifice. Methylene blue was used to identity the minor papilla orifice in 14 of 38 patients (spraying, 13; injection, 1). Minor papilla cannulation was successful in 12 of 14 (86%) patients (spraying 11, injection 1). Mild pancreatitis developed in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: Methylene blue spraying or injection appears to be a helpful technique for identification of the inconspicuous minor papilla orifice in patients with pancreas divisum.     

Size,location and patency of the minor duodenal papilla as determined by dye‐injection endoscopic retrograde pancreatography

Background: The accessory pancreatic duct (APD) sometimes is developmentally obliterated near the duodenum. We evaluated patency of the minor duodenal papilla by dye‐injection endoscopic retrograde pancreatography to determine whether patency was related to papillary size and location. Methods: We injected 2–3 mL of contrast material containing indigocarmine into the main pancreatic duct via an endoscopic catheter in 104 patients. It was endoscopically observed whether dye was extruded from the minor papilla. Size of the minor papilla and distance from the orifice of the major duodenal papilla to the apex of the minor papilla were measured endoscopically with measuring forceps. Results: The APD was patent in 56 of 104 cases (54%). Size of the minor papilla varied considerably from 3 to 6 mm, but showed no correlation with patency. Half of the patients with chronic pancreatitis (6/13) had the minor papilla larger than 6 mm. In cases where the terminal APD had a cudgel or tapering‐off configuration, the minor papilla was larger than in cases where the duct had a stick shape. The minor papilla was patent in 9 out of 10 cases (90%) when it was near the major papilla (≤ 1.5 cm). Frequency of a patent minor papilla was 16 out of 33 (48%) when it existed 1.5 to 2.0 cm from the major papilla, and 31 out of 61 (51%) when the distance was more than 2.0 cm. Conclusions: The minor papilla was more frequently patent when it was close to the major papilla (P < 0.05).     

PANCREATIC DUCTAL DRAINAGE BY ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND‐ASSISTED RENDEZVOUS TECHNIQUE FOR PAIN CAUSED BY DUCTAL STRICTURE WITH CHRONIC PANCREATITIS

With the advances in echoendoscopes, the frontier of therapeutic endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is expanding. A 50‐year‐old male presented to us with unrelenting pain following an episode of alcoholic pancreatitis. Imaging studies revealed evidence of pancreatic ductal hypertension with a pseudocyst in the head of the pancreas. Following unsuccessful attempts at drainage of the pancreatic duct (PD) via the minor or major papilla at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, he underwent endoscopic ductal drainage with the EUS‐assisted rendezvous technique. The PD was punctured under the guidance of EUS. A guidewire was then introduced into the PD and was guided into the duodenal lumen through the minor papilla. The tip of the guidewire was grasped with forceps coming out of a duodenoscope introduced instead of the echoendoscope. A pancreatic stent was inserted over the guidewire across the minor papilla. After the endoscopic pancreatic stenting, the patient achieved symptomatic relief.     

Long-term results of endoscopic management of pancreas divisum with recurrent acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND: The long-term efficacy of endoscopic treatment in pancreas divisum is controversial. This study evaluated the long-term results of dorsal duct stent insertion and endoscopic sphincterotomy of the minor papilla in patients presenting with recurrent acute pancreatitis or chronic pain. METHODS: Pancreas divisum was diagnosed in 175 patients between 1980 and 1998. Twenty-four patients seen with recurrent acute pancreatitis without underlying chronic calcifying pancreatitis or significant alcohol consumption were included in this study with a follow-up of at least 24 months. Eight were treated by sphincterotomy of the minor papilla alone, and 16 underwent dorsal duct stent insertion for a median duration of 8 months. RESULTS: The median duration of follow-up after endoscopic management was 39 months (range 24-105; interquartile range 40.5). All patients had recurrent acute pancreatitis before endoscopic treatment during a median period of 5 years. At the end of the follow-up there were only 2 recurrences of acute pancreatitis (p < 0.01). The number of patients with chronic pain before endoscopic treatment and at the end of follow-up decreased from 20 of 24 (83%) to 7 of 24 (29%) without reaching statistical significance. The 25% recurrence rate was estimated at 50 months by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Nine patients presented with a dilated dorsal duct before endoscopic treatment. After stent insertion, dorsal duct dilatation appeared in all 16 patients who underwent stent placement, and pancreatic duct stenosis developed in 3. Four patients (19%) required further treatment for pain recurrence or acute pancreatitis, with surgical procedures being performed in 2 cases. Complications occurred in 9 of 24 patients (38%), mainly acute pancreatitis or stenosis of the minor papilla. All complications except one were managed conservatively. Complications seemed to be less frequent after minor papilla sphincterotomy than after pancreatic stent insertion (25% vs. 44%). CONCLUSION: In patients with pancreas divisum, both dorsal duct stent insertion and minor papilla sphincterotomy decrease the rate of recurrent acute pancreatitis, whereas relief of chronic pain was less obvious.     

Endoscopic ultrasound and pancreas divisum

Pancreas divisum is the most common congenital anatomic variation of the pancreatic ductal anatomy and in most of the individuals it is asymptomatic. However, in minority of individuals it is presumed to cause recurrent acute pancreatitis and chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is the gold standard for its diagnosis, but is invasive and associated with significant adverse effects. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) allows the detailed evaluation of the pancreaticobiliary ductal system without injecting contrast in these ducts. Moreover, it provides detailed images of the parenchyma also. Therefore EUS, both radial and linear, has potential for being a minimally invasive diagnostic modality for pancreas divisum. A number of EUS criteria have been suggested for the diagnosis of pancreas divisum. These criteria have varying sensitivity and specificity and hence there is a need for objective and uniform criteria that have the best diagnostic accuracy. Secretin EUS has a potential for diagnosing minor papilla stenosis and thus help in planning appropriate therapy. EUS guided pancreatic duct interventions can help in draining dorsal duct in symptomatic patients with failed minor papilla cannulation. But these techniques are technically demanding and associated with potential severe complications.     

Histomorphological study on the minor duodenal papilla

The morphological characteristics of the minor duodenal papilla were studeied histologically using surgically resected specimens according to the presence or absence of an opening of the accessory pancreatic duct in 30 patients (22 with a ductal opening and 8 without such an opening) who had undergone pancreatoduodenectomy within the past 4 years. The follwoing results were found: 1) The minor duodenal papilla was composed fundamentally of the accessory pancreatic duct, pancreatic tissue of the dorsal pancreas whcih penetrated the duodenal proper muscular tunics and the surrounding fibrous connective tissue. 2) In those specimens with a ductal opening, smooth muscle fiber bundles dervied from the duodenal proper muscular tunics surrounded the accessory pancreatic duct and seemed to possess sphincter action similar to that of Oddi sphincter muscles. 3) In those specimens without a ductal opening, the accessory pancreatic duct terminated blindly in the minor duodenal papilla which was comprised mostly of pancreatic tissue and seemed to have no sphincter muscles. 4) Islet cells in the pancreatic tissue of the minor duodenal papilla were rich in B-cells which were round to ovoid in shape and sharply outlined.GastroenterolJpn 1991;26:356-362     

Endoscopic approach through the minor papilla for the management of pancreatic diseases

AIM: To clarify the efficacy and safety of an endoscopic approach through the minor papilla for the management of pancreatic diseases.METHODS: This study included 44 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures performed in 34 patients using a minor papilla approach between April 2007 and March 2012. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical profiles of the patients, the endoscopic interventions, short-term outcomes, and complications.RESULTS: Of 44 ERCPs, 26 were diagnostic ERCP, and 18 were therapeutic ERCP. The most common cause of difficult access to the main pancreatic duct through the major papilla was pancreas divisum followed by distortion of Wirsung’s duct. The overall success rate of minor papilla cannulation was 80% (35/44), which was significantly improved by wire-guided cannulation (P = 0.04). Endoscopic minor papillotomy (EMP) was performed in 17 of 34 patients (50%) using a needle-knife (13/17) or a pull-type papillotome (4/17). EMP with pancreatic stent placement, which was the main therapeutic option for patients with chronic pancreatitis, recurrent acute pancreatitis, and pancreatic pseudocyst, resulted in short-term clinical improvement in 83% of patients. Mild post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred as an early complication in 2 cases (4.5%).CONCLUSION: The endoscopic minor papilla approach is technically feasible, safe, and effective when the procedure is performed in a high-volume referral center by experienced endoscopists.     

ENDOSCOPIC SNARE PAPILLECTOMY FOR TUMORS OF THE MAJOR DUODENAL PAPILLA

Safer procedures for performing endoscopic papillectomy on papillary tumors should be established. Fourteen patients underwent endoscopic papillectomy between January 2000 and February 2007. Before papillectomy, tumors were slightly elevated by submucosal injection of glycerol, followed by semi‐circular mucosal incision of the anal border of the lesion in five cases. In nine cases, balloon‐catheter‐assisted endoscopic snare papillectomy was performed. All patients routinely underwent endoscopic nasobiliary drainage tube placement in the bile duct. A pancreatic stent was inserted only in patients with non‐patent minor papilla. The rate of positive margins was lower in patients who received balloon‐catheter‐assisted papillectomy than in patients who received papillectomy without a balloon catheter. Of three patients with local recurrence, only one patient required surgery. Post‐procedural complications included hemorrhage in eight patients, pancreatitis in one patient, and perforation in one patient. No perforation occurred after submucosal injection and mucosal incision. In three of four patients with early hemorrhage, bleeding was noticed as hemobilia through the nasobiliary drainage tube; this appears to be useful for early diagnosis of bleeding. No pancreatitis occurred in patients with patent minor papilla, suggesting that pancreatic stent placement is unnecessary in patients with patent minor papilla.     

State-art: diagnosis and management in pancreas divisum

Pancreas divisum (PD), the most common congenital variant of pancreatic duct anatomy, occurs when the ductal systems of the ventral and dorsal pancreatic ducts fail to fuse during the second month of gestation. With non-union of the ducts, the major portion of the pancreatic exocrine secretion enters the duodenum by way of the dorsal duct and minor papilla. It has been generally accepted that a relative obstruction to pancreatic exocrine secretory flow through the minor duct and minor papilla could result in pancreatitis in small numbers of patients with PD. The debate whether PD causes pancreatitis continues, although most authorities agree that PD is a definite cause in a subgroup of patients. Most patients with PD and well-documented acute recurrent pancreatitis have responded favorably to surgical sphincteroplasty of the minor papilla. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the most common procedure for diagnosis PD in patients who have pancreatobiliary symptoms. MRCP is being increasingly used to establish the diagnosis and secretin stimulation can improve ductal images greatly. Endoscopic management of symptomatic patients with PD is evolving. Only a limited number of series are available, using endoscopic pancreatic stent placement, minor papilla endoscopic papillotomy, or both to decompress the dorsal duct in an effort to restore pancreatic exocrine secretory flow. Even with relatively small numbers of patients and a near absence of controlled, randomized trials, it appears that the patients most likely to benefit, as with surgery, are those with well-documented ARP rather than pain alone or chronic pancreatitis. Overall we recommend that pancreatic stenting and pancreatic sphincterotomy should be done only in large centers with experience in therapeutic ERCP. Further randomized trials would be of interest.     

A two-year old boy with recurrent bouts of acute abdominal pain

In a small number of patients with pancreas divisum (with stenotic minor papilla) a relative obstruction to pancreatic exocrine secretory flow results in pancreatitis. We report a 2-year-old boy presenting with recurrent bouts of abdominal pain. The diagnosis of acute pancreatitis was made based on blood biochemistry results. Ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging showed several abdominal pseudocysts, peritoneal exsudate and confirmed pancreatitis but initially failed to reveal the aetiology. Ascites and cysts contained pancreatic enzymes. After weeks of combined conservative and surgical treatment, a magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography with secretin, showed a pancreas divisum with a cyst between the ducts of Santorini and Wirsung. Based on these findings, two endoscopic papillotomies (minor and major papilla) were performed. Three years follow-up was uneventful. In a child with recurrent pancreatitis or pancreatitis with chronic recurrent abdominal pain it is crucial to search aggressively for congenital abnormalities, including pancreas divisum. Secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography or diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging is a valuable diagnostic tool for visualizing pancreatic duct anatomy.     

胰腺分裂的内镜诊断

为了认识胰腺分裂及其临床意义，对２５００例经内镜逆行胰胆管造影（ＥＲＣＰ）检查中检出的３７例胰腺分裂患者资料进行回顾分析。３７例均经主、副乳头插管显示出腹胰管及背胰管，胆管显影１４例，显影率３７．８％。体会到胰腺分裂者ＥＲＣＰ时插胆管困难，并对胰腺分裂的ＥＲＣＰ诊断及临床意义进行了讨论     

Minor papilla cannulation and dorsal ductography in pancreas divisum

Until recently, pancreas divisum represented a major technical barrier to a complete evaluation of pancreatic ductal anatomy. Technical refinements have now made it possible to achieve minor papilla cannulation and dorsal ductography in more than 90% of attempts. In 120 consecutive dorsal ductograms, structural pathology was demonstrated in 36 subjects (30%): chronic pancreatitis in 23, pancreatic stones in 10, pseudocyst(s) in 4, ductal "cut-off" in 7, pancreatic cancer in 3, and partial agenesis in 1 (some patients had more than one finding). For patients in whom alcohol abuse was excluded, ductal pathology was present in 25%. Abnormal ventral ductograms were present in only 8% of cases, demonstrating that dorsal ductography has an appreciable additional diagnostic yield. When the clinical situation indicates the need for pancreatography, minor papilla cannulation should be performed if major papilla cannulation fails or reveals only the ventral pancreatogram of pancreas divisum.     

Endoscopic minor papilla interventions in patients without pancreas divisum

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic treatment through the minor papilla is well known in patients with pancreas divisum. However, there are few data concerning endoscopic minor papilla interventions in patients without pancreas divisum when access to the main pancreatic duct via the major papilla is technically difficult. METHODS: Records for 213 patients without pancreas divisum who, from April 2001 to June 2003, underwent ERCP for various pancreatic diseases were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were included if they had endoscopic interventions via the minor papilla because access through the major papilla was not possible. OBSERVATIONS: Minor papilla papillotomy or fistulotomy with endoscopic interventions was successful in 10 (91%) of 11 patients. Of these 10 patients, 9 had chronic pancreatitis and one had pancreatic ductal leak from previous pancreatic surgery. The reasons for the inability to access the main pancreatic duct to the tail of the gland via the major papilla included a distorted course of the main pancreatic duct (n=5), impacted stone (n=5), and stricture (n=8). In 8 patients, there were two causes. No complication related to the minor papilla interventions was observed in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic minor papilla interventions are technically feasible in patients with pancreatic diseases but not pancreas divisum when access to the main pancreatic duct via the major papilla is not possible.     

Clinical experience in 82 patients with pancreas divisum: preliminary results of manometry and endoscopic therapy

Although it is clear that the majority of patients with pancreas divisum have no clinical disease, there is a subset of patients who have either unexplained abdominal pain or recurrent pancreatitis. Endoscopic therapy of the minor papilla may alter the clinical course of those patients with pancreas divisum and recurrent pancreatitis. Manometric study of the minor papilla is feasible and reveals a sphincter mechanism similar to the major papilla. Clinical response to endoscopic therapy may aid in selecting patients who might benefit from surgical sphincteroplasty. Refinement of manometric study of the minor papilla offers a potential method of detecting functional obstruction of dorsal duct drainage.     

Endoscopic pancreatic duct stent placement for inflammatory pancreatic diseases

The role of endoscopic therapy in the management of pancreatic diseases is continuously evolving; at present most pathological conditions of the pancreas are successfully treated by endoscopic retrograde cholangio- pancreatography （ERCP） or endoscopic ultrasound （EUS）, or both. Endoscopic placement of stents has played and still plays a major role in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis, pseudocysts, pancreas divisum, main pancreatic duct injuries, pancreatic fistulae, complications of acute pancreatitis, recurrent idiopathic pancreatitis, and in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. These stents are currently routinely placed to reduce intraductal hypertension, bypass obstructing stones, restore lumen patency in cases with dominant, symptomatic strictures, seal main pancreatic duct disruption, drain pseudocysts or fluid collections, treat symptomatic major or minor papilla sphincter stenosis, and prevent procedure-induced acute pancreatitis. The present review aims at updating and discussing techniques, indications, and results of endoscopic pancreatic duct stent placement in acute and chronic inflammatory diseases of the pancreas.     

Pancreas Divisum

Opinion statement  

Pancreas divisum: congenital anatomic variant or anomaly? Contribution of endoscopic retrograde dorsal pancreatography

The relationship between pancreas divisum and pancreatic disease has been studied in a series of 304 patients. This congenital anatomic variant, consisting of a separate pancreatic ductal system, was diagnosed by endoscopic pancreatography and dorsal duct opacification was achieved in 97 of these patients. This anatomic variation was observed with the same frequency in cases of pancreatitis (acute and chronic) (6.9%) and in the series of patients investigated by endoscopic pancreatography taken as a whole (5.7%). Moreover, incidences of pancreatic disease in patients with and without pancreas divisum were not statistically different when compared. These results show that pancreas divisum should not be regarded as an etiologic factor in pancreatitis but should be considered as a coincidental anatomic variant encountered in nearly 10% of the population. The results obtained herein do not support the hypothesis that stenosis of the accessory papilla occurs frequently in cases of pancreas divisum. We conclude that no further therapy should be systematically proposed for patients with pancreas divisum and pancreatitis.