Prospective study of estramustine phosphate for hormone refractory prostate cancer patients following androgen deprivation therapy

INTRODUCTION: Estramustine phosphate (EMP) in combination with other cytotoxic agents has been widely used in clinical trials as an anti-tumor agent for the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). However, few prospective studies have considered the efficacy of EMP monotherapy for HRPC patients following androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), given the availability of methods to measure prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in the serum. We therefore initiated a prospective study to determine whether EMP is efficient for HRPC following ADT using changes in PSA levels as the major endpoint. METHODS: After a diagnosis of anti-androgen withdrawal syndrome had been excluded, 34 patients with HRPC who showed an elevated serum PSA level in 3 or more sequential tests following ADT were treated orally with 560 mg/day of EMP. The clinical stage and the median PSA value for inclusion in the study were D2 and 25.9 (range 6.5-540.8) ng/ml, respectively. Treatment was continued until evidence of disease progression reappeared or until severe adverse effects appeared. RESULTS: Of the 34 patients enrolled, 29 were evaluated, while the other 5 (15%) patients were discontinued due to severe gastrointestinal side effects. Seven of the 29 patients (24%) showed a decrease of 50% or greater in serum PSA levels from the initially elevated values, with the median duration of PSA response being 8.0 (range 2.2-18.8) months. Baseline PSA, hemoglobin, alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase, performance status, and length of time of initial hormonal treatment did not correlate with the PSA response. With a median follow-up time of 20.0 (range 3.2-45.6) months, the cancer-specific survival rate at 2 years was 83% in the PSA responders and 44% in the non-responders. The PSA response was correlated with cancer-specific survival (p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Following ADT one quarter of HRPC patients responded to EMP, with more than 50% of patients showing a decrease in PSA levels and an enhanced survival rate.     

Prolonged hypocalcemia following denosumab therapy in metastatic hormone refractory prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is a leading cause of cancer death, frequently associated with widespread bone metastases. We report two cases of hypocalcemia following the first dose of denosumab in metastatic hormone refractory prostate cancer, the first case requiring 26 days of intravenous calcium therapy. This is the first report of prolonged hypocalcemia following denosumab in a patient with normal renal function.     

前列腺癌内分泌治疗所引起的骨质疏松

雄激素阻断治疗(Androgen-DeprivationTherapy.ADT)即内分泌治疗已成为前列腺癌、特别是进展期前列腺癌的常用治疗方法 .而抗雄治疗所引起的骨质疏松以及其他骨相关疾病也越来越受到重视.越来越多的人开始关注如何尽早发现、诊断由内分泌治疗所引起的骨质流失以及骨质疏松并能及时采取充分的预防和治疗措施从而改善患者的生活质茸.国内外的大量研究进一步明确了抗雄治疗与前列腺癌患者的骨质流失存在着密切的联系.通过DEXA检测骨盆骨密度被认为是诊断前列腺癌患者骨质疏松的首选方式,同时出于对患者生活质量的考虑,脊柱和股骨颈的骨密度测定也相当重要.对于接受ADT的前列腺癌患者骨质疏松的治疗,目前已经形成的共识是单纯的钙剂和维生索D治疗是远远不够的.通过诸多随机对照研究发现,二膦酸盐(氨羟二磷酸二钠和氨羟二磷酸二钠)和选择性雌激素受体调节剂(雷洛昔芬和托瑞米芬)可增加前列腺癌症患者的骨密度.在抗雄治疗的过程中,定期的骨密度检测.鼓励适量地运动以及根除不良的生活习惯对于保持骨骼健康也很莺要.     

Immunohistochemical changes in prostate cancer after androgen deprivation therapy

Androgen deprivation induces substantial changes in the phenotype of prostate cancer that are accompanied by alterations in protein expression. Immunohistochemical studies allow precise cellular localization of such expression, thereby providing an understanding of the biochemical alterations caused by therapy. Expression of proteins may be increased (e.g., multiple growth factors, heat shock protein), decreased (e.g., microvessel density, proliferation markers, certain integrins), or remain unchanged (e.g., prostate specific antigen, prostatic acid phosphatase, prostate-specific membrane antigen, and other secretory proteins). Variations in immunoreactivity may be of prognostic value in some patients. This report summarizes the existing literature regarding changes in tissue expression of proteins, as determined by immunohistochemistry, and the clinical implications of these changes.     

Managing complications of androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

With the increase in the number of prostate cancer cases seen in the United States, the use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as a form of treatment has continued to rise. With the increasing use of ADT, it is important for the urologist to recognize the potential side effects from the use of ADT and ways in which to minimize or eliminate the risks from these side effects. This article describes the potential complications of ADT and the recommendations for treatment or prevention of these complications. In addition,we examine the role of nontraditional forms of ADT and the potential benefits they offer.     

Contemporary role of androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

Context

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer (PCa) represents one of the most effective systemic palliative treatments known for solid tumors. Although clinical trials have assessed the role of ADT in patients with metastatic and advanced locoregional disease, the risk-benefit ratio, especially in earlier stages, remains poorly defined. Given the mounting evidence for potentially life-threatening adverse effects with short- and long-term ADT, it is important to redefine the role of ADT for this disease.

Objective

Review the published experience with currently available ADT approaches in various contemporary clinical settings of PCa and reported serious treatment-related adverse events. This review addresses the level of evidence associated with the use of ADT in PCa, focusing upon survival outcome measures. Furthermore, this paper discusses evolving approaches targeting androgen receptor signaling pathways and emerging evidence from clinical trials with newer compounds.

Evidence acquisition

A comprehensive review of the literature was performed, focusing on data from the last 10 yr (January 2000 to July 2011) and using the terms androgen deprivation, hormone treatment, prostate cancer and adverse effects. Abstracts from trials reported at international conferences held in 2010 and 2011 were also evaluated.

Evidence synthesis

Data from randomized controlled trials and population-based studies were analyzed in different clinical paradigms. Specifically, the role of ADT was evaluated in patients with nonmetastatic disease as the primary and sole treatment, in combination with radiation therapy (RT) or after surgery, and in patients with metastatic disease. The data suggest that in men with nonmetastatic disease, the use of primary ADT as monotherapy has not shown a benefit and is not recommended, while ADT combined with conventional-dose RT (<72 Gy) for patients with high-risk disease may delay progression and prolong survival. The postoperative use of ADT remains poorly evaluated in prospective studies. Likewise, there are no trials evaluating the role of ADT in patients with biochemical relapses after surgery or RT. In patients with metastatic disease, there is a clear benefit in terms of quality of life, reduction of disease-associated morbidity, and possibly survival. Treatment with bilateral orchiectomy, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist therapy, with and without antiandrogens has been associated with various serious adverse events, including cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and skeletal complications that may also affect mortality.

Conclusions

Although ADT is an effective treatment of PCa, consistent long-term benefits in terms of quality and quantity of life are predominantly evident in patients with advanced/metastatic disease or when ADT is used in combination with RT (<72 Gy) in patients with high-risk tumors. Implementation of ADT should be evidence based, with special consideration to adverse events and the risk-benefit ratio.     

Progressive osteoporosis during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE: Hypogonadism is a prominent risk factor for osteoporosis in older men. However, bone loss during androgen ablation therapy for prostate cancer has rarely been quantitated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Femoral neck bone mineral density was determined in 26 men before orchiectomy or chemical castration as initial hormone therapy for prostate cancer and at 6-month intervals thereafter for 6 to 42 months. Measurements were made in 16 other men at 12 to 24 months beginning 3 to 8 years after the onset of castration. Baseline and post-castration bone loss was related to several host and tumor characteristics, and compared to similar measurements in 12 control subjects. RESULTS: Average age corrected baseline femoral neck bone mineral density was higher in controls than in treated men and remained essentially unchanged for 2 years. Following orchiectomy average bone mineral density decreased 2.4% and 7.6%, respectively, during years 1 and 2 (2-year loss 2.5% to 17.0%), with similar losses documented in men undergoing chemical castration. Average bone mineral density decreased 1.4% to 2.6% per year 3 to 8 years after uninterrupted androgen deprivation. Age corrected baseline bone mineral density was greater in men who were obese, younger than 75 years or participated in regular exercise but the influence of each characteristic could not be isolated. Post-castration bone loss was greater in men who were obese, younger than 75 years without regular exercise. CONCLUSIONS: Chemical or surgical castration in men with prostate cancer is usually followed by greatly accelerated bone loss which may be superimposed on a bone mass already depleted before hormonal therapy. Baseline bone mass and subsequent bone loss may be influenced by host obesity, age and exercise habits.     

Reversibility of androgen deprivation therapy in patients with prostate cancer

PURPOSE: We determined the duration of testosterone suppression and recovery in patients with prostate cancer treated with a hydrogel implant releasing the gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist histrelin or treated with a depot GnRH agonist. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone (T) responses were monitored in 3 groups. Group 1 comprised 7 patients treated with histrelin implant, which is inserted into the arm of the patient while under local anesthesia, and suppresses LH and testosterone. Following implant removal antiandrogens (flutamide or bicalutamide) were administered. Group 2 comprised 8 patients treated with long-term depot GnRH super agonists which were later withheld and patients were given bicalutamide. Group 3 consisted of 7 patients treated with bicalutamide. RESULTS: In group 1 LH and T were in the castration range while implants were in place. LH increased 1 to 6 weeks after implant removal followed by an increase in T. In 7 of 8 patients in group 2, LH, T and prostate specific antigen remained suppressed for 9 months. In 6 of 7 group 3 patients LH and T increased with a decrease in prostate specific antigen. CONCLUSIONS: Despite continuous prolonged T suppression for up to 3 years due to histrelin implant, LH and T increased rapidly following implant removal, indicating that suppression is reversible. In view of the 9-month suppression of LH and T after the last depot GnRH injection in 7 of 8 patients, it is possible to space GnRH agonist administration at longer intervals. However, T must be monitored to determine that suppression is maintained.     

激素抵抗性前列腺癌的基因治疗

激素抵抗性前列腺癌的治疗是目前前列腺癌治疗中的难点之一.传统的治疗方法 ,如化疗、放疗等都未能有效地将患者的生存期延长.而目前随着对激素抵抗性前列腺癌分子机制研究的深入及基因工程技术的进展,基因治疗正逐步应用于其中.本文就激素抵抗性前列腺癌基因治疗现状作一综述,并展望其将来.     

Neuroendocrine differentiation of localized prostate cancer during endocrine therapy

A 74-year-old male was treated with endocrine therapy for localized prostate cancer. After 25 months he complained of a swollen neck, and was diagnosed with prostate cancer with lymph node metastasis of neuroendocrine differentiation. Neuroendocrine differentiation without elevation of conventional tumor markers is rare during the initial recurrent course of localized prostate cancer.     

Metabolic changes in patients with prostate cancer during androgen deprivation therapy

Androgen deprivation therapy continues to be widely used for the treatment of prostate cancer despite the appearance of new‐generation androgen‐receptor targeting drugs after 2000. Androgen deprivation therapy can alleviate symptoms in patients with metastatic prostate cancer and might have a survival benefit in some patients, but it causes undesirable changes in lipid, glucose, muscle or bone metabolism. These metabolic changes could lead to new onset or worsening of diseases, such as obesity, metabolic syndrome, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, sarcopenia or fracture. Several studies examining the influence of androgen deprivation therapy in Japanese patients with prostate cancer also showed that metabolic changes, such as weight gain, dyslipidemia or fat accumulation, can occur as in patients in Western countries. Efforts to decrease these unfavorable changes and events are important. First, overuse of androgen deprivation therapy for localized or elderly prostate cancer patients should be reconsidered. Second, intermittent androgen deprivation therapy might be beneficial for selected patients who suffer from impaired quality of life as a result of continuous androgen deprivation therapy. Third, education and instruction, such as diet or exercise, to decrease metabolic changes before initiating androgen deprivation therapy is important, because metabolic changes are likely to occur in the early androgen deprivation therapy period. Fourth, routine monitoring of weight, laboratory data or bone mineral density during androgen deprivation therapy are required to avoid unfavorable events.     

Bone health in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE: Patients with recurrent or metastatic prostate cancer generally receive androgen deprivation therapy, which can result in significant loss of bone mineral density. We explored androgen deprivation therapy related bone loss in prostate cancer, current treatments and emerging therapies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature published on the pathogenesis and management of androgen deprivation therapy related bone loss was compiled and interpreted. Recent drug therapy findings were reviewed, including treatment guidelines. RESULTS: Men with prostate cancer often present with bone loss and the initiation of androgen deprivation therapy can trigger further rapid decreases. This results in an increased fracture risk, and greater morbidity and mortality. Early detection of osteoporosis through androgen deprivation therapy screening and prompt initiation of therapy are critical to prevent continued decreases. Lifestyle changes such as diet, supplementation and exercise can slow the rate of bone loss. Pharmacological therapy with oral and intravenous bisphosphonates has been demonstrated to prevent or decrease the bone loss associated with androgen deprivation therapy. However, important differences exist among various bisphosphonates with respect to efficacy, compliance and toxicity. Only zoledronic acid has been shown to increase bone mineral density above baseline and provide long-term benefit by decreasing the incidence of fracture and other skeletal related events in men with bone metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Androgen deprivation therapy associated bone loss adversely affects bone health, patient quality of life and survival in men with prostate cancer. Increased awareness of this issue, identification of risk factors, lifestyle modification and initiation of bisphosphonate therapy can improve outcomes. Education of patients and physicians regarding the importance of screening, prevention and treatment is essential.     

Osteoporosis in men treated with androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE: We surveyed the growing literature on osteoporosis secondary to androgen deprivation therapy and provide suggestions regarding its identification and treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed pertinent studies of male osteoporosis, osteoporotic fracture incidence or bone mineral density loss as a possible side effect of prostate cancer treatment and potential therapies for this side effect. RESULTS: Hypogonadism is a well-known cause of secondary osteoporosis in men. There is evidence of decreased bone mineral density with all types of androgen deprivation therapy, presumably due to its anti-testosterone effect. Bone mineral density loss is 3% to 5% yearly in the first few years of androgen deprivation therapy with an increase in osteoporotic fracture incidence. There are little data on potential treatments, although bisphosphonates and intermittent androgen deprivation therapy may have salutary effects. CONCLUSIONS: Osteoporosis is an important and debilitating side effect of androgen deprivation therapy, although precise estimates of its incidence, degree and cost are not completely elucidated. Until more data are available, it is prudent for all men beginning androgen deprivation therapy to receive calcium and vitamin D, and maintain a moderate exercise regimen. Baseline and at least 1 followup bone density measurement seem appropriate with bisphosphonate treatment a possibility in those in whom osteoporosis develops. More research is needed to explore the effect of bisphosphonates, calcium and vitamin D supplementation, exercise, calcitonin, selective estrogen re-uptake inhibitors, estrogens and intermittent androgen deprivation therapy on the course of androgen deprivation therapy induced osteoporosis. The osteoporotic fracture incidence and bone mineral density should be regularly incorporated into studies involving the hormonal treatment of prostate cancer.     

Lipoprotein profile in men with prostate cancer undergoing androgen deprivation therapy

Sex steroids are known to modulate serum lipoproteins. Studies have suggested that serum testosterone levels are associated with a beneficial lipid profile. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is employed in the treatment of recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer (PCa), resulting in profound hypogonadism. As male hypogonadism unfavorably influences lipid profile and men with PCa have high cardiovascular mortality, we evaluated the effects of long-term ADT on fasting lipids. This Cross-sectional study was conducted in a university-based research institution. We evaluated 44 men, 16 undergoing ADT for at least 12 months before the study (ADT group), 14 age-matched eugonadal men with non-metastatic PCa who were status post prostatectomy and/or radiotherapy and not on ADT (non-ADT group) and 14 age-matched eugonadal controls (Control group). None of the men had known history of diabetes or dyslipidemia. Mean age was similar in the three groups (P = 0.37). Serum total (P < 0.01) and free (P < 0.01) testosterone levels were lower in the ADT group compared to the other groups. Men on ADT had higher body mass index (BMI) compared to the other groups (P < 0.01). Men in the ADT group had significantly higher levels of total cholesterol compared to the other two groups (P = 0.03). After adjustment for BMI, men on ADT continued to have significantly higher fasting levels of total cholesterol (P = 0.02), LDL cholesterol (P = 0.04) and non-HDL cholesterol (P = 0.03) compared to the control group. No significant differences were seen in the levels of other lipoproteins between the three groups. These data show that men undergoing long-term ADT have higher total and LDL cholesterol than age-matched controls. Long-term prospective studies are needed to determine the time of onset of changes in these lipoproteins while on ADT and the influence of these changes on cardiovascular mortality.     

间歇性雄激素阻断治疗前列腺癌的研究进展

间歇性雄激素阻断(intermittent androgen deprivation,IAD)治疗是雄激素阻断治疗前列腺癌(即内分泌治疗)的一种新策略。目前的研究表明间歇性雄激素阻断治疗可行并具有其独特的优势。本文就间歇性雄激素阻断治疗前列腺癌的原理、近年来的基础和临床研究及应用原则等问题作一综述。