Comparison of oral ketamine and oral midazolam as sedative agents in pediatric dentistry

The safe and effective treatment of uncooperative or combative preschool children with extensive dental needs is one of pediatric dentist's ongoing challenges. The traditional methods of behavior management are no longer acceptable to parents as they are not ready to spare more time for dental treatment of their children. Keeping this in mind, the present study was designed and carried out to evaluate the sedative effects of oral ketamine and oral midazolam prior to general anesthesia. Twenty uncooperative children in the age-group of 2-6 years were selected after thorough medical examination and investigations. Informed consent was obtained from the parent. This was a randomized double-blind study. An anesthesiologist administered either 0.5 mg/kg midazolam or 5 mg/kg ketamine orally. The heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation were recorded at regular intervals. The sedation and anxiolysis scores were also recorded. The parents were asked to answer a questionnaire at the follow-up session the next day on the surgical experience of the parent and the child and side effects experienced, if any. When the data was subjected to statistical analysis, it was observed that both drugs resulted in adequate sedation at the end of 30 min, with oral midazolam providing significantly better anxiolysis. The heart rate and respiratory rate were marginally higher with oral ketamine. The questionnaire revealed a better response with oral midazolam; side effects were more prominent with oral ketamine.     

BIS monitoring during midazolam and midazolam-ketamine conscious intravenous sedation for oral surgery

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the bispectral index scale (BIS) would provide added benefit to established methods of monitoring conscious sedation with midazolam (M group) or midazolam supplemented with ketamine (MK group). STUDY DESIGN: BIS was prospectively and blindly examined in 22 patients receiving outpatient oral surgery with conscious sedation supplemented with local anesthesia. RESULTS: The average midazolam dose in the midazolam group over the treatment period was 0.01 mg/kg/h, and the average midazolam plus ketamine dose was 0.01 and 0.05 mg/kg/h, respectively. Mean BIS values throughout the sedation study period were 90 for the midazolam group and 94 for the midazolam plus ketamine group. The addition of ketamine did not lower BIS. BIS values did not alter significantly over time except for an expected transient drop after the midazolam bolus induction. CONCLUSION: BIS levels remained close to baseline levels, suggesting that BIS would not provided any additional benefit to currently established methods of monitoring patient consciousness during conscious sedation for oral surgery.     

The effects of midazolam on pediatric patients with asthma

PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of midazolam in asthmatic patients undergoing dental treatment. METHODS: Twenty-four children, aged 19 to 65 months, with a diagnosis of mild to moderate asthma were given an oral dose of 0.5 mg/kg of midazolam. Oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, and pulse rate were monitored before, during, immediately after, and 30 minutes following dental treatment. The child's asthma score was also determined before and after treatment. The dental operator assessed the overall sedation outcome immediately after treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-three of the 24 subjects had asthma scores of "0" before and after treatment. During dental treatment, 2 patients had oxygen saturations of 94% at one point during treatment. However, oxygen saturation increased when the patient's head and neck were repositioned. Twenty-three of the 24 subjects had oxygen saturations above 95% at 30 minutes following treatment. Pulse rates and respiratory rates exhibited transitory increases, linked to when the child was stimulated. Statistical analysis was conducted from within subjects repeated measures via ANOVA and with a general linear model approach. No statistically significant differences occurred in oxygen saturation and respiratory rate. However, significant differences did occur in pulse rate between 5 and 10 minutes (mean difference=10+/-3.84) and between 10 and 15 minutes (mean difference=19+/-5.50), as expected. No statistically significant differences occurred in asthma score before and after treatment. Twelve subjects were assessed to have excellent behavior, 5 subjects were satisfactory, and 7 subjects were unsatisfactory. No treatment was aborted. CONCLUSIONS: With adherence to the AAPD's sedation guidelines, midazolam at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg is a safe and effective mean for sedation of patients with mild to moderate asthma.     

Comparison of remifentanil with fentanyl for deep sedation in oral surgery.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare recovery for oral surgery patients given a deep sedation regimen of midazolam, propofol, and remifentanil with a standard control of fentanyl in place of remifentanil. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This investigation was designed as a randomized, prospective, single-blinded controlled study. Group 1, the control, received midazolam 0.03 mg/kg, fentanyl 1 microg/kg, and propofol initially at 140 microg/kg/min. Group 2 received midazolam 0.03 mg/kg, remifentanil: propofol (1:500) given at an initial propofol infusion rate of 40 microg/kg/min. Outcome measures included time to response to verbal command, Aldrete score = 9, Postanesthesia Discharge Scoring System = 7, and assessment by the Digit Symbol Substitution Test. RESULTS: Forty-seven subjects were entered in the study. Baseline findings were homogenous between the 2 groups. Subjects in group 2 recovered earlier (P < .005) and required less propofol for both the induction (0.8 +/- 0.4 versus 1.2 +/- 0.6 mg/kg; mean +/- SD, P < .01) and maintenance of deep sedation (46 +/- 9 versus 131 +/- 17 microg/kg/min; P < .005). There were minor differences in vital signs. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that this remifentanil regimen provided significantly more rapid recovery and used significantly less propofol compared with the fentanyl regimen.     

Nasotracheal Fiberoptic Intubation: Patient Comfort,Intubating Conditions and Hemodynamic Stability During Conscious Sedation with Different Doses of Dexmedetomidine

The study aims to evaluate the efficacy of two doses of dexmedetomidine for sedation during awake fiberoptic intubation (AFOI). The study was designed in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded manner and carried out in an academic medical university. Forty young co-operative patients aged 15–45 years of either sex belonging to ASA class I-II, planned for elective maxillo-facial surgery formed the study group. All patients received midazolam 0.05 mg/kg, glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg, ondansetron 4 mg, and ranitidine 50 mg IV 15 min before as premedication, oxygen by nasal cannula, and topical local anesthetics to the airway. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the groups; dexmedetomedine 1 μg/kg IV (Group L), or dexmedetomidine 1.5 μg/kg IV (Group H). Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) was assessed. Primary outcome measurements were: HR, MAP, SpO₂ and EtCO₂ and secondary outcome measurements were: intubation scores by vocal cord movement, coughing and limb movement, fiberoptic intubation comfort score, nasotracheal intubation score and airway obstruction score. On the first post-operative day, recall, level of discomfort during fiberoptic intubation, adverse events and satisfaction score were also assessed. There were no significant hemodynamic differences between the two groups. OAA/S was significantly better with dexmedetomidine 1.5 μg/kg (p < 0.05) and patients were significantly calmer, more cooperative and satisfied during awake fiberoptic intubation with dexmedetomidine 1.5 μg/kg with fewer transient adverse effects. Dexmedetomidine 1.5 μg/kg proved to be more effective for sedation for awake fiberoptic intubation.     

Comparing efficacy and safety of four intravenous sedation regimens in dental outpatients.

BACKGROUND: Management of patients' fear and anxiety during dental treatment is a primary concern of dental practitioners. Pharmacological strategies used in outpatient dental settings must be both safe and effective. Regimens of intravenously administered sedative drugs were evaluated in a collaborative, multicenter study of outpatients undergoing removal of impacted third molars. METHODS: A total of 997 patients randomly received one of five treatments: placebo; midazolam administered to a clinical endpoint of conscious sedation (mean dose, 8.6 milligrams); midazolam plus additional midazolam as needed during the procedure (mean total dose, 12.2 mg); fentanyl (1.4 micrograms/kilogram) plus midazolam to achieve the same endpoint of conscious sedation (mean dose, 5.7 mg); or fentanyl (1.4 (micrograms/kg), midazolam (mean dose, 5.8 mg) and methohexital as needed during the procedure (mean dose, 61.0 mg). RESULTS: Each drug regimen reduced anxiety during surgery in comparison with placebo, with the combination of midazolam, fentanyl and methohexital resulting in significantly less anxiety in comparison with the other treatment groups. Pain reports by patients during surgery also were reduced significantly by the combination of fentanyl, midazolam and methohexital. Patients' global evaluations of the efficacy of sedation ranked midazolam with supplemental midazolam and the combination of fentanyl, midazolam and methohexital as significantly more efficacious than the other two drug regiments. The authors noted transient respiratory depression in patients in the two opioid-treated groups, but no other physiological changes were detected. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide evidence that the drugs and doses evaluated resulted in therapeutic benefit to dental outpatients, with minimal incidence of potentially serious adverse effects. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The results of this large-scale study provide assurance to both the public and the dental profession of the safety of parenteral sedation with these drugs and combinations of these drugs when titrated slowly in the recommended doses by appropriately trained dentists.     

A comparison of chloral hydrate and diazepam sedation in young children

The purpose of this study was to compare a high and low dose of diazepam with chloral hydrate in the sedation of young children. Thirty healthy children between the ages of 20 and 48 months, with a mean age of 33.5 months, participated in the study. All children exhibited negative behavior during a screening visit and required at least two restorative appointments with the use of sedation. A dose of either 0.3 mg/kg or 0.6 mg/kg of diazepam at one visit and 50 mg/kg of chloral hydrate at another visit was administered in a double-blind manner. All children were restrained in a Papoose Board with auxiliary head restraint and received 50% nitrous oxide/oxygen during treatment. The degree of sleep, body movement, crying, pulse rate, respiratory rate, and blood oxygen saturation were monitored before and during the operative procedures. Vital signs remained essentially unchanged during treatment, except for transitory elevations of the pulse during periods of stimulation. There were no statistically significant differences among the three drug regimens with regard to movement and crying. Significantly more patients who received chloral hydrate were asleep than when either dose of diazepam was given during the first 60 min of treatment. The only side effect found was vomiting in one patient with both chloral hydrate and diazepam. It is concluded that the sedative effects of chloral hydrate and diazepam are similar when young children are sedated for dental treatment. The use of diazepam might be more advantageous because chloral hydrate produces more sleep during the first hour of treatment.     

A comparison of two meperidine/hydroxyzine sedation regimens for the uncooperative pediatric dental patient

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of submucosal-administered meperidine (SM) and oral-administered meperidine (OM). Both regimens were used in conjunction with oral hydroxyzine for the sedation of children for dental treatment. METHODS: Twenty preschool-age children, with previous histories of uncooperative behavior, were randomly assigned to first receive a sedation regimen of either SM (0.5 mg/ lb), or OM (1 mg/lb), both with oral hydroxyzine (0.5 mg/lb). A cross-over design was utilized so that each child received both regimens. Safety was monitored through vital signs and side effects. Efficacy was measured with Houpt and Frankl behavior ratings. RESULTS: Vital signs remained stable during both treatments. Differences noted were clinically insignificant. The major side effects reported during submucosal injection included pain (58%) and edema (26%). All blinded behavior ratings, in both sedation regimens, significantly improved from presedation Frankl ratings. No significant differences existed between treatments. Success was 63% in the SM group and 80% in the OM group. The percentages were not statistically significant (P=.219). CONCLUSIONS: Both methods of administration were found to be safe and effective for sedating uncooperative pediatric dental patients. Neither was significantly more effective or safer than the other.     

A comparison of two oral ketamine-diazepam regimens for the sedation of anxious pediatric dental patients.

PURPOSE: This study compared 2 oral ketamine-diazepam regimens (8 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg of ketamine in combination with 0.1 mg/kg diazepam) in preschool age children with respect to physiological, behavioral and amnestic parameters. METHODS: Twenty-five children completed the double-blind, crossover design. Physiologic, behavioral and amnestic effects were evaluated. RESULTS: ANOVA demonstrated significant changes in systolic blood pressures and heart rates in both the 8 mg/kg group and 10 mg/kg group (P < 0.05), as well as significant changes in diastolic blood pressures in the 10 mg/kg group (P < 0.05). However, these changes were not clinically significant. Success rates were 28% for the 8 mg/kg dosage and 44% for the 10 mg/kg dosage. There was a cumulative vomiting rate of 50% and a psychic phenomena rate of 10%. There were no statistically significant differences between the two dosages with regard to success rates, postoperative vomiting, or psychic phenomena using McNemar's test. CONCLUSIONS: There is no advantage of 10 mg/kg dose of ketamine over the 8 mg/kg dose. Ketamine did not demonstrate amnestic effects in this study. There were statistically but no clinically significant changes in physiological parameters in either group. This study does not support the use of either 8 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg oral ketamine for the sedation of uncooperative children.     

Comparison of a chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine combination with and without meperidine in the sedation of pediatric dental patients

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine combination with and without meperidine in the sedation of pediatric dental patients. Twenty children were given 40 mg/kg chloral hydrate and 25 mg hydroxyzine, and 20 children were given 40 mg/kg chloral hydrate and 25 mg hydroxyzine and 0.5 mg/kg meperidine. All children were between the ages of 24 and 60 months and all medications were given orally 1 hr before treatment. The children received 50% nitrous oxide for the entire procedure. All children were restrained in a Papoose Board. The patients were videotaped and their behavior was rated by two independent pediatric dentists using the Houpt Scale. The independent evaluators did not know which sedation regimen had been used. They rated success of the sedations by degree of sleep, crying, body movements, and overall behavior. Oxygen saturation of arterial blood, and heart rate also were measured. The vital signs were consistent for the two groups. There was no significant difference in the effectiveness of the two drug regimens.     

A comparison of midazolam and midazolam with remifentanil for patient-controlled sedation during operations on third molars

Our aim was to compare patients' satisfaction and cooperation, and clinical efficacy, of midazolam alone, and midazolam and remifentanil for patient-controlled sedation during removal of third molars. Forty patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists grades I and II, admitted for extraction of impacted mandibular third molars were included in this randomised, prospective study. They were given an intravenous bolus of midazolam 0.03 mg/kg and then allowed to use patient-controlled sedation. In the midazolam group, 2 ml of 0.5 mg/ml midazolam was given automatically. In the midazolam-remifentanil group, 2 ml of 0.5 mg/ml midazolam and 12.5 microg/ml remifentanil were given in the same manner. The lockout period was 5 min. Vital signs and oxygen saturation were recorded. Patients' and surgeons' satisfaction, and the patients' degree of amnesia about the local anaesthetic, drilling, removal of the tooth, and pain during extraction were also assessed. There were no significant differences between systolic and diastolic blood pressures during sedation, but heart rate after 30 min in the combined group was significantly lower than in the midazolam group (p<0.05). Surgeons described the midazolam group as excellent in 9 and good in 11. In the combined group, satisfaction was excellent in 11, good in 7, and satisfactory or unacceptable in 1 of each. Immediately postoperatively, 19 patients in each group ranked their satisfaction as excellent and 1 as good. Twenty-four hours later it was unchanged in the midazolam group, while 15 patients in the other group thought it was excellent, 3 good, and 2 poor. Patient-controlled analgesia with midazolam or midazolam and remifentanil is safe and reliable during extraction of third molars.     

Combined oral midazolam–ketamine better than midazolam alone for sedation of young children: a randomized controlled trial

International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 2013; 23: 207–215 Background. There is a lack of clinical trials on paediatric dental sedation. Aim. We investigated whether young children’s behaviour improves during dental treatment with oral ketamine/midazolam compared with midazolam alone or no sedation. Design. Healthy children under 36 months of age, presenting early childhood caries were randomly assigned to receive protective stabilization plus: combined oral midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) and ketamine (3 mg/kg) (MK), or oral midazolam (1.0 mg/kg) (MS), or no sedative (PS). One observer scored children’s behaviour using the Ohio State University Behavior Rating Scale (OSUBRS) at determined points in a dental exam (no sedative) and treatment session. Data were analysed using nonparametric bivariate tests. Results. Forty‐one children were included. In the dental exam session, the sum of OSUBRS scores was similar for the three groups (P = 0.81). In the treatment session, the MK produced more cooperative behaviour than MS and PS (P = 0.01), longer sessions (P = 0.04), and a pattern of homogeneous OSUBRS scores from the reception area (before sedative administration) to the end of the session (P = 0.06). No immediate and post‐discharge side effects were observed in groups MK and MS. Conclusions. The combination of oral midazolam and ketamine is efficacious for guiding the behaviour of children under 3 years old.     

A study of the effectiveness of oral midazolam sedation for orthodontic extraction of permanent teeth in children: a prospective,randomised, controlled,crossover trial

OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety, effectiveness and acceptability of o:ral midazolam sedation for orthodontic extraction of permanent teeth in children. DESIGN: A prospective, randomised, controlled, crossover trial. METHODS: A total of 26 children aged 10-16 (ASA I), referred for orthodontic extraction of premolar or canine teeth under sedation, were included in the study. Each child required two treatment sessions for the extraction of equivalent teeth on opposite sides of the mouth. Each subject was sedated with either ora midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) or nitrous oxide and oxygen (30%/70%) at the first visit and the alternative form at the second visit. At each visit two teeth were extracted, one upper and one lower. Heart rate, arterial oxygen saturation, respiration rate, sedation and behavioural scores were recorded every five minutes. Overall behaviour, patient acceptance and patient satisfaction were recorded at the end of treatment. RESULTS: Of the 26 children included in the study there were 12 males and 14 females. The mean age was 12.5 years. The mean heart rate and respiratory rate for both groups were similar and within acceptable clinical limits. The lowest mean arterial oxygen saturation levels for nitrous oxide and midazolam sedation were 97.7% and 95.0% respectively. Although midazolam caused greater oxygen desaturation, the range (91%-100%) was within safe limits for conscious sedation. The mean level of sedation was greater in the midazolam group compared with the nitrous oxide group and all but one case completed treatment. A total of 23 patients (88%) said they would be prepared to have ora midazolam sedation again and 17 (65%) actually preferred oral midazolam to nitrous oxide sedation. CONCLUSION: Oral midazolam (0.5mg/kg) appears to be a safe and acceptable form of sedation for 10-16 year old paediatric dental patients.     

Conscious sedation by rectal administration of midazolam or midazolam plus ketamine as alternatives to general anesthesia for dental treatment of uncooperative children

The trial included 24 children (aged 2–7 yr) referred for dental treatment under general anesthesia, since conventional behavioral management methods had failed to achieve treatment acceptance. As an alternative, they received, on two separate occasions with "identical" dental treatment, conscious sedation by rectal administration of either midazolam (0.3 mg/kg body weight (bwt)) or midazolam (0.3 mg/kg bwt) plus ketamine (1.0 mg/kg bwt). This allowed a double-blind, crossover design. The aims were to assess conscious sedation, combined with local anesthesia, as an alternative to general anesthesia, and further to evaluate the effects obtained by addition of a low dose of ketamine to rectally administered midazolam. The feasibility of dental treatment was rated as excellent or good for 16 of the 24 children when premedicated with midazolam, and for 18 of the 24 children when ketamine was added to midazolam. At least some treatment could be given to all children. Verbal contact was maintained with all children throughout both treatment sessions. The children were significantly less anxious when they arrived for the second session. Amnesia and drowsiness were significantly increased when ketamine was added to midazolam. The combination also tended to be more efficient in relief of anxiety and prevention of pain, but there were large variations in the children's responses to the drugs. Midazolam significantly reduced the blood oxygen level, but not with ketamine added. For most children, both regimens proved to be appropriate as alternatives to general anesthesia. From a pharmacologic point of view, the combination of midazolam and ketamine appears to be reasonable because 1) both drugs have sedative and amnestic properties, 2) ketamine adds an analgesic component, 3) midazolam counteracts the psychic side-effects of ketamine, and 4) ketamine counteracts the depressive effects of midazolam on vital body functions (respiration and circulation).     

A double-blind comparison of low-dose intravenous ketamine and methohexital in adults

Two ultralight general anesthetic techniques, one using low-dose ketamine and the other using methohexital as the primary anesthetic agent, were compared for efficacy, safety, and psychomotor recovery in a double-blind fashion for use during third molar surgery. Low-dose intravenous ketamine as the primary anesthetic following premedication with fentanyl and midazolam, and in conjunction with nitrous oxide, appeared to produce less hypoxia, hypercarbia, and apnea than when methohexital was used. No significant differences were noted in heart rate or blood pressure between the techniques. The ketamine technique was universally preferred by the surgeons and anesthesiologists because of superior patient cooperation and airway management. No unpleasant psychomimetic side effects of significance were noted with the use of ketamine. Postoperative recovery took slightly longer in the ketamine group, with patients being judged fit for discharge approximately 10 to 15 minutes later than the patients who received methohexital.     

Continuous infusion of methohexital and alfentanil hydrochloride for general anesthesia in outpatient third molar surgery

Three anesthetic techniques were compared in this study: 1) Intermittent Brevital boluses supplemented with fentanyl and midazolam all titrated to patient movement, 2) constant infusion of Brevital supplemented with fentanyl and midazolam all delivered in calculated mg/kg doses based on total body weight, and 3) constant infusion of methohexital (Brevital) and alfentanil (Alfenta) supplemented by midazolam (Versed), droperidol, and glycopyrolate (Robinul) delivered in calculated mg/kg doses based on lean body mass. Nitrous oxide was delivered in all cases via nasal mask in a 30% to 50% concentration. The mean total dose of Brevital in group 1 (intermittent Brevital bolus) was 0.17 mg/kg/min (SD = 0.07), group 2 (Brevital infusion) was 0.23 mg/kg/min (SD = 0.06), and group 3 (alfentanil/Brevital infusion) was 0.12 mg/kg/min (SD = 0.07). Mean total dose of alfentanil in group 3 equaled 1.58 mcg/kg/min (SD = 0.73). In group 1, 94% of the patients experienced moderate to severe movement intraoperatively. Twenty-three percent of the patients in group 2, and only 7% of group 3 exhibited moderate to severe movement. Emergence in group 3 averaged 4.5 minutes (SD = 1.6). Three patients (7%) in group 3 had postoperative nausea. Additional subjective findings in group 3 included easier airway maintenance during administration of the anesthetic, lack of unpleasant emergence phenomena such as crying, and prompt readiness for discharge. It was concluded that continuous alfentanil and Brevital infusion satisfied the objectives of safety, stability, predictability, and rapid recovery, while improving operating conditions (less patient movement) when compared with more traditional anesthetic techniques.     

Sedation in uncooperative children undergoing dental procedures: a comparative evaluation of midazolam, propofol and ketamine

Dentists usually face a common problem dealing with pediatric patients due to their high levels of anxiety and fear, associated with dental procedures. Such children are usually managed by various pharmacological methods. The efficacy and safety of conscious sedation, using intravenous short acting group of drugs (midazolam, propofol and ketamine) in uncooperative children, requiring oral rehabilitation was thus evaluated in this study. A total of 30 uncooperative children, aged 3-6 years, belonging to ASA I, II category formed the study group. The efficacy of the three group of drugs was evaluated on the basis of the onset of sedation, duration of action, side effects encountered, and the overall cooperative behavior of the child throughout the course of the procedure, after obtaining parental consent. Results showed that propofol was highly effective in terms of onset of sedation, although increased body movements and crying, pain on injection and intermittent cough was observed as the main side effects of the drug. Midazolam showed the longest duration of action, but was not very effective in terms of treatment completion due to increased movements and crying. Maximum cooperation during the procedure was obtained with ketamine and no adverse effects were encountered. We preferred ketamine from the results of our study and recommended future evaluation of ketamine in combination with other sedatives.     

A randomized double-blinded trial of chloral hydrate with or without hydroxyzine versus placebo for pediatric dental sedation

Chloral hydrate and hydroxyzine are a drug combination frequently used by practitioners to sedate pediatric dental patients, but their effectiveness has not been compared to a negative control group in humans. The aim of this crossover, double-blinded study was to evaluate the effect of these drugs compared to a placebo, administered to young children for dental treatment. Thirty-five dental sedation sessions were carried out on 12 uncooperative ASA I children aged less than 5 years old. In each session patients were randomly assigned to groups P (placebo), CH (chloral hydrate 75 mg/kg) and CHH (chloral hydrate 50 mg/kg plus hydroxyzine 2.0 mg/kg). Vital signs and behavioral variables were evaluated every 15 min. Comparisons were statistically analyzed using Friedman and Wilcoxon tests. P, CH and CHH had no differences concerning vital signs, except for breathing rate. All vital signs were in the normal range. CH and CHH promoted more sleep in the first 30 min of treatment. Overall behavior was better in CH and CHH than in P. CH, CHH and P were effective in 62.5%, 61.5% and 11.1% of the cases, respectively. Chloral hydrate was safe and relatively effective, causing more satisfactory behavioral and physiological outcomes than a placebo.     

Bispectral index system (BIS) monitoring reduces time to extubation and discharge in children requiring oral presedation and general anesthesia for outpatient dental rehabilitation

PURPOSE: Pediatric oral rehabilitation patients who receive presedation with oral Versed and general anesthesia (GA) occasionally experience prolonged sedation and delayed discharge. The Bispectral Index System (BIS) is an EEG monitor that measures the anesthesia level. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of monitoring the BIS to not monitoring the BIS on time from discontinuation of GA to extubation and to discharge. METHODS: Twenty-nine children were enrolled. BIS was monitored from admission until discharge. Each child received 0.7 mg/kg of oral Versed. In the operating room, GA with sevoflurane (IH), rocuronium 1 mg/kg (IV), fentanyl 1 microg/kg (IV), and ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg (IV) was administered. Randomly, in half the patients, the anesthesiologist maintained the level of anesthesia and BIS by adjusting sevoflurane. In the rest, the anesthesiologist did not know BIS. The time from turning off sevoflurane to discharge was compared. RESULTS: Group 1 patients were extubated 5+/-2 minutes sooner than group 2 patients (P=.04). The post-anesthesia care unit stay for group 1 patients was 47+/-17 minutes compared to 63+/-17 minutes in group 2. (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring anesthesia with BIS promotes earlier extubation and discharge for pediatric dental patients who receive oral Versed and sevoflurane GA.     

右美托咪定对口腔颌面外科清醒插管患者吞咽功能的影响

目的:观察右美托咪定用于口腔颌面外科患者清醒插管的镇静效果及其对吞咽功能的影响.方法:选择50例口腔颌面外科手术需行清醒插管的患者,随机分成2组(每组25例),即右美托咪定(DEX)组和咪达唑仑+芬太尼(MF)组.插管前20 min,DEX组给予右美托咪定1.0 μg/kg,MF组给予生理盐水50 mL;插管前5 mi...