Birth outcomes for Australian mother-infant pairs who received an influenza vaccine during pregnancy, 2012–2014: The FluMum study

IntroductionIn Australia, influenza vaccination is recommended for all women who will be pregnant during the influenza season. Vaccine safety and effectiveness are key concerns and influencers of uptake for both vaccine providers and families. We assessed the safety of receiving an influenza vaccination during any trimester of pregnancy with respect to preterm births and infant birthweight.MethodsWe conducted a nested retrospective cohort study of ‘FluMum’ participants (2012–2014). Our primary exposure of interest was influenza vaccination during pregnancy. The primary outcomes of interest were infant birthweight and weeks’ gestation at birth for live singleton infants. Analyses included comparisons of these birth outcomes by vaccination status and trimester of pregnancy an influenza vaccine was given. We calculated means, proportions, and relative risks and performed multivariable logistic regression for potential confounding factors.ResultsIn the 7126 mother-infant pairs enrolled in this study, mean maternal age at infant birth was 31.7 years. Influenza vaccine uptake in pregnancy was 34%. Most mothers with a known date of vaccination received a vaccine in the second trimester (51%). Those mothers with a co-morbidity or risk factor were 13% more likely to have influenza vaccine during pregnancy compared to other mothers (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.04–1.24, p = 0.007). Mean weeks’ gestation at birth was 38.7 for the vaccinated and 38.8 for the unvaccinated group (p = 0.051). Infants in the vaccinated group weighed 15 g less in birthweight compared to the unvaccinated infants (95% CI −12.8 to 42.2, p = 0.29).ConclusionResults arising from this large Australian cohort study are reassuring with respect to two critical safety outcomes; preterm births and low infant birthweights. Studies examining a broader range of birth outcomes following influenza vaccination during pregnancy are required, particularly now that maternal vaccination in pregnancy has expanded to include pertussis as well as influenza.     

Trends in compliance with two-dose influenza vaccine recommendations in children aged 6 months through 8 years, 2010–2015

BackgroundChildren aged 6 months through 8 years may require two doses of influenza vaccine for adequate immune response against the disease. However, poor two-dose compliance has been reported in the literature.MethodsWe analyzed data for >2.6 million children from six immunization information system (IIS) sentinel sites, and assessed full vaccination coverage and two-dose compliance in the 2010–2015 influenza vaccination seasons. Full vaccination was defined as having received at least the recommended number of influenza vaccine doses (one or two), based on recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Two-dose compliance was defined as the percentage of children during each season who received at least two doses of influenza vaccine among those who required two doses and initiated the series.ResultsAcross seasons, ⩾1-dose influenza vaccination coverage was mainly unchanged among 6–23 month olds (range: 60.9–66.6%), 2–4 year olds (range: 44.8–47.4%), and 5–8 year olds (range: 34.5–38.9%). However, full vaccination coverage showed increasing trends from 2010–11 season to 2014–15 season (6–23 months: 43.0–46.5%; 2–4 year olds: 26.3–39.7%; 5–8 year olds, 18.5–33.9%). Across seasons, two-dose compliance remained modest in children 6–23 months (range: 63.3–67.6%) and very low in older children (range: 11.6–18.7% in children 2–4 years and 6.8–13.3% in children 5–8 years). In the 2014–15 season, among children who required and received 2 doses, only half completed the two-dose series before influenza activity peaked.ConclusionsImproved messaging of the two-dose influenza vaccine recommendations is needed for providers and parents. Providers are encouraged to determine a child’s eligibility for two doses of influenza vaccine using the child’s vaccination history, and to vaccinate children early in the season so that two-dose series are completed before influenza peaks.     

Influenza during pregnancy: Incidence,vaccination coverage and attitudes toward vaccination in the French web-based cohort G-GrippeNet

IntroductionPregnancy is a risk factor for severe influenza. However, data on influenza incidence during pregnancy are scarce. Likewise, no data are available on influenza vaccine coverage in France since national recommendation in 2012. We aimed to assess these points using a novel nationwide web-based surveillance system, G-GrippeNet.MethodsDuring the 2014/2015 influenza season, pregnant women living in metropolitan France were enrolled through a web platform (https://www.grippenet.fr/). Throughout the season, participants were asked to report, on a weekly basis, if they had experienced symptoms of influenza-like-illness (ILI). ILI episodes reported were used to calculate incidence density rates based on period of participation from each participant. Vaccination coverage was estimated after weighing on age and education level from national data on pregnant women. Factors associated with higher vaccination coverage were obtained through a logistic regression with Odds Ratio (OR) corrected with the Zhang and Yu method.ResultsA total of 153 women were enrolled. ILI incidence density rate was 1.8 per 100 person-week (95%CI, 1.5–2.1). This rate was higher in women older than 40 years (RR = 3.0, 95%CI [1.1–8.3], p = 0.03) and during first/second trimesters compared to third trimester (RR = 4.0, 95%CI [1.4–12.0], p = 0.01). Crude vaccination coverage was 39% (95%CI, 31–47) and weighted vaccination coverage was estimated at 26% (95%CI, 20–34). Health care provider recommendation for vaccination (corrected OR = 7.8; 95%CI [3.0–17.1]) and non-smoking status (cOR = 2.1; 95%CI [1.2–6.9]) were associated with higher vaccine uptake.ConclusionThis original web based longitudinal surveillance study design proved feasible in pregnant women population. First results are of interest and underline that public health policies should emphasize the vaccination promotion through health care providers.     

Predictors of influenza vaccination in the U.S. among children 9–13 years of age

Background and objectivesU.S. estimates of seasonal influenza (flu) vaccine uptake in 2014–2015 were 62% for 5–12 year olds, dropping to 47% for 13–17 year olds. The Healthy People 2020 goal for these age groups is 80%. It is important to understand factors associated with influenza vaccination, especially for those ages where rates begin to decline. The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with influenza vaccination acceptance in 9–13 year old children.MethodsAn online U.S. survey of mothers of children aged 9–13 assessed children's influenza vaccine uptake in the previous season, healthcare utilization, sociodemographics, and vaccine attitudes. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors of influenza vaccine status.ResultsThere were 2363 respondents (Mean age = 38 years old). Referent children were 57% female and 66% non-minority race/ethnicity with a mean age of 10.6 years. By maternal report, 59% of children had received an influenza vaccine in the previous season. Predictors of influenza vaccine uptake included a recommendation or strong recommendation from a health care provider, seeing a health care provider in the past year, positive attitudes regarding the influenza vaccine, and being a minority race. Child gender, age, insurance coverage, and whether the child had a regular healthcare provider were not associated with influenza vaccine uptake (p = n.s.).ConclusionsThis sample reported overall rates of influenza vaccine uptake similar to national surveillance data, but still lower than national goals. Provider recommendations along with health attitudes and seeing a health care provider were associated with vaccine uptake. Promising interventions may include more directive physician messaging for influenza vaccine uptake in youth, encouraging more regular well-child visits during the adolescent years, and promoting influenza vaccination at alternative sites.     

Parental perceptions of childhood seasonal influenza vaccination in Singapore: A cross-sectional survey

PurposeSeasonal influenza vaccination is recommended in children aged 6–59 months, but little is known about child vaccination coverage and determinants in Asian settings. We report the results of a survey of knowledge, attitudes, practices, and determinants of child influenza vaccination in Singapore.MethodsIn December 2015-March 2016, we conducted a survey of 332 parents of children aged 6 months to 5 years attending pre-schools. We assessed child influenza vaccine coverage and parental knowledge, attitudes, and practices of child influenza vaccination. We used multivariable regression and structural equation models to identify factors associated with child influenza vaccination.ResultsKnowledge about influenza, perceived benefit of vaccination, and willingness to vaccinate were high. However, only 32% of children had ever received influenza vaccine, and only 15% in the past year. Factors independently associated with child influenza vaccination included: being recommended influenza vaccine by a child’s doctor (prevalence ratio (PR) = 2.47, 95% CI: 1.75–3.48); receiving influenza vaccine information from a private general practitioner (PR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.05–2.04); regularly receiving pre-travel influenza vaccine (PR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.19–2.25); higher willingness to vaccinate (PR = 1.58, 95% CI:1.24–2.04 per unit increase in willingness score); and feeling well-informed about influenza vaccine (PR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.04–1.99). Parents who obtained influenza vaccine information from television were less likely to have vaccinated their child (PR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.23–0.85). Path analysis indicated that being recommended vaccination by a child's doctor increased willingness to vaccinate and self-efficacy (feeling well-informed about influenza vaccine). Median willingness-to-pay for a dose of influenza vaccine was SGD30 (interquartile range: SGD20-SGD50), and was higher in parents of vaccinated compared with unvaccinated children (SGD45 vs SGD30, p = 0.0012).ConclusionKnowledge and willingness to vaccinate was high in this parent population, but influenza vaccine uptake in children was low. Encouraging medical professionals to recommend vaccination of eligible children is key to improving uptake.     

The free vaccination policy of influenza in Beijing,China: The vaccine coverage and its associated factors

BackgroundIn order to improve influenza vaccination coverage, the coverage rate and reasons for non-vaccination need to be determined. In 2007, the Beijing Government published a policy providing free influenza vaccinations to elderly people living in Beijing who are older than 60. This study examines the vaccination coverage after the policy was carried out and factors influencing vaccination among the elderly in Beijing.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted through the use of questionnaires in 2013. A total of 1673 eligible participants were selected by multistage stratified random sampling in Beijing using anonymous questionnaires in-person. They were surveyed to determine vaccination status and social demographic information.ResultsThe influenza vaccination coverage was 38.7% among elderly people in Beijing in 2012. The most common reason for not being vaccinated was people thinking they did not need to have a flu shot. After controlling for age, gender, income, self-reported health status, and the acceptance of health promotion, the rate in rural areas was 2.566 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.801–3.655, P < 0.010) times greater than that in urban areas. Different mechanisms of health education and health promotion have different influences on vaccination uptake. Those whom received information through television, community boards, or doctors were more likely to get vaccinated compared to those who did not (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.403, P < 0.010; OR = 1.812, P < 0.010; OR = 2.647, P < 0.010).ConclusionThe influenza vaccine coverage in Beijing is much lower than that of developed countries with similar policies. The rural–urban disparity in coverage rate (64.1% versus 33.5%), may be explained by differing health provision systems and personal attitudes toward free services due to socioeconomic factors. Methods for increasing vaccination levels include increasing the focus on primary care and health education programs, particularly recommendations from doctors, to the distinct target populations, especially with a focus on expanding these efforts in urban areas.     

Survey of distribution of seasonal influenza vaccine doses in 201 countries (2004–2015): The 2003 World Health Assembly resolution on seasonal influenza vaccination coverage and the 2009 influenza pandemic have had very little impact on improving influenza control and pandemic preparedness

There is no global monitoring system for influenza vaccination coverage, making it difficult to assess progress towards the 2003 World Health Assembly (WHA) vaccination coverage target. In 2008, the IFPMA Influenza Vaccine Supply International Task Force (IVS) developed a survey method to assess the global distribution of influenza vaccine doses as a proxy for vaccination coverage rates. The latest dose distribution data for 2014 and 2015 was used to update previous analyses. Data were confidentially collected and aggregated by the IFPMA Secretariat, and combined with previous IFPMA IVS survey data (2004–2013). Data were available from 201 countries over the 2004–2015 period. A “hurdle” rate was defined as the number of doses required to reach 15.9% of the population in 2008. Overall, the number of distributed doses progressively increased between 2004 and 2011, driven by a 150% increase in AMRO, then plateaued. One percent fewer doses were distributed in 2015 than in 2011. Twenty–three countries were above the hurdle rate in 2015, compared to 15 in 2004, but distribution was highly uneven in and across all WHO regions. Three WHO regions (AMRO, EURO and WPRO) accounted for about 95% of doses distributed. But in EURO and WPRO, distribution rates in 2015 were only marginally higher than in 2004, and in EURO there was an overall downward trend in dose distribution. The vast majority of countries cannot meet the 2003 WHA coverage targets and are inadequately prepared for a global influenza pandemic. With only 5% of influenza vaccine doses being distributed to 50% of the world’s population, there is urgency to redress the gross inequities in disease prevention and in pandemic preparedness. The 2003 WHA resolution must be reviewed and revised and a call issued for the renewed commitment of Member States to influenza vaccination coverage targets.     

Influenza vaccination coverage of Vaccine for Children (VFC)-entitled versus privately insured children,United States, 2011–2013

BackgroundThe Vaccines for Children (VFC) program provides vaccines at no cost to children who are Medicaid-eligible, uninsured, American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN), or underinsured and vaccinated at Federally Qualified Health Centers or Rural Health Clinics. The objective of this study was to compare influenza vaccination coverage of VFC-entitled to privately insured children in the United States, nationally, by state, and by selected socio-demographic variables.MethodsData from the National Immunization Survey-Flu (NIS-Flu) surveys were analyzed for the 2011–2012 and 2012–2013 influenza seasons for households with children 6 months–17 years. VFC-entitlement and private insurance status were defined based upon questions asked of the parent during the telephone interview. Influenza vaccination coverage estimates of children VFC-entitled versus privately insured were compared by t-tests, both nationally and within state, and within selected socio-demographic variables.ResultsFor both seasons studied, influenza coverage for VFC-entitled children did not significantly differ from coverage for privately insured children (2011–2012: 52.0% ± 1.9% versus 50.7% ± 1.2%; 2012–2013: 56.0% ± 1.6% versus 57.2% ± 1.2%). Among VFC-entitled children, uninsured children had lower coverage (2011–2012: 38.9% ± 4.7%; 2012–2013: 44.8% ± 3.5%) than Medicaid-eligible (2011–2012: 55.2% ± 2.1%; 2012–2013: 58.6% ± 1.9%) and AI/AN children (2011–2012: 54.4% ± 11.3%; 2012–2013: 54.6% ± 7.0%). Significant differences in vaccination coverage among VFC-entitled and privately insured children were observed within some subgroups of race/ethnicity, income, age, region, and living in a metropolitan statistical area principle city.ConclusionsAlthough finding few differences in influenza vaccination coverage among VFC-entitled versus privately insured children was encouraging, nearly half of all children were not vaccinated for influenza and coverage was particularly low among uninsured children. Additional public health interventions are needed to ensure that more children are vaccinated such as a strong recommendation from health care providers, utilization of immunization information systems, provider reminders, standing orders, and community-based interventions such as educational activities and expanded access to vaccination services.     

Influenza vaccination coverage and timeliness among children requiring two doses, 2004–2009

ObjectiveTo assess influenza vaccination coverage and timeliness among children requiring two doses in a season.MethodsThis study examined seasonal influenza vaccination of 17,800 children from five academically-affiliated clinics in New York City using hospital and city immunization registries. Eligible children were 6 months–8 years and needed two influenza vaccine doses in a given season between 2004–05 and 2009–10. Any (≥ 1 dose) and full (2 doses) vaccination coverage by December 15 and March 31 as well as interval between doses were calculated. Vaccination trends over time, determinants, and missed opportunities were assessed.ResultsChildren were primarily Latino and publicly insured. Full coverage by March 31 increased between the 2004–05 and 2009–10 seasons (9% vs. 29%, p < 0.001). Few children received both doses by December 15 (2–13%). The interval between doses was almost twice as long as recommended and increased over time (2004–05: 52 days; 2009–10: 64 days; p < 0.001). Older age and Latino ethnicity were negative predictors of full vaccination by March 31. Missed opportunities for the second dose were common.ConclusionDespite improvements, low-income, minority children requiring two influenza vaccine doses remain at risk of incomplete and delayed vaccination. Barriers to and strategies for timely full vaccination should be explored.     

No association between influenza vaccination during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes

BackgroundPregnant women are recommended to receive inactivated influenza vaccination anytime during pregnancy. Studies have investigated the impact of influenza vaccination during pregnancy on birth outcomes and results on preterm birth have been inconsistent.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study among children born at a gestational age ≥ 24 weeks from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2015 at Kaiser Permanente Northern California facilities (KPNC). We evaluated the association between maternal influenza vaccination during pregnancy and risk of preterm birth, small and large for gestational age, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), respiratory distress syndrome, low birth weight, and low Apgar score. We ascertained the dates of maternal influenza vaccination, conception, and delivery, as well as birth outcomes from KPNC inpatient and outpatient databases. Conditional multivariate Cox regression and logistic regression analyses were used to determine the association between maternal vaccination during pregnancy and risk of each birth outcome.ResultsThe study included 145,869 children. Maternal influenza vaccination during pregnancy was not associated with risk of small or large for gestational age births, preterm birth, need for mechanical ventilation at birth, respiratory distress syndrome, admission to the NICU, low birth weight, or low Apgar score. However, when we did not control for immortal time bias, the risk of preterm birth (odds ratio [OR] = 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66–0.72) was lower among infants of vaccinated mothers.ConclusionWe found no association between maternal influenza vaccination during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes. When investigating preterm birth outcome in association with vaccination during pregnancy, immortal time bias should be taken into account in the analysis.     

Brief education to promote maternal influenza vaccine uptake: A randomized controlled trial

BackgroundAlthough pregnant women are the highest priority group for seasonal influenza vaccination, maternal influenza vaccination rates remain suboptimal. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a brief education intervention on maternal influenza vaccine uptake.MethodsDuring the 2013–14 and 2014–15 influenza seasons, we recruited 321 pregnant women from the antenatal clinics of 4 out of 8 public hospitals in Hong Kong with obstetric services. Hospitals were geographically dispersed and provided services to pregnant women with variable socioeconomic backgrounds. Participants were randomized to receive either standard antenatal care or brief one-to-one education. Participants received telephone follow-up at 2 weeks postpartum. The primary study outcome was self-reported receipt of influenza vaccination during pregnancy. The secondary outcomes were the proportion of participants who initiated discussion about influenza vaccination with a health care professional and the proportion of participants who attempted to get vaccinated.ResultsCompared with participants who received standard care, the vaccination rate was higher among participants who received brief education (21.1% vs. 10%; p = 0.006). More participants in the education group initiated discussion about influenza vaccination with their HCP (19.9% vs. 13.1%; p = 0.10), but the difference was not statistically significant. Of participants who did not receive the influenza vaccine (n = 271), 45 attempted to get vaccinated. A significantly higher proportion of participants who attempted to get vaccinated were in the intervention group (82.2% vs. 17.8%; p < 0.001). If participants who had attempted vaccination had received the vaccine, vaccination rates would have been substantially higher (44.1% vs. 15%; p < 0.001). Twenty-six participants were advised against influenza vaccination by a healthcare professional, including general practitioners, obstetricians, and nurses.ConclusionAlthough brief education was effective in improving vaccination uptake among pregnant women, overall vaccination rates remain suboptimal. Multicomponent approaches, including positive vaccination recommendations by healthcare professionals, are needed to promote maternal influenza vaccination.Clinical Trial Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01772901).     

Couverture par le vaccin de la grippe saisonnière des médecins généralistes et de leurs patients. Enquête de pratique auprès de médecins généralistes français après la campagne de vaccination 2011–2012

BackgroundIn France, vaccination coverage against seasonal influenza for risk groups was inadequate: 55.2% of people aged 65 and older, and 33% of the16–64 year group with chronic targeted disorders were vaccinated in March 2012. Three quarters of general practitioners were vaccinated. Our objective was to estimate the influence of the vaccination status of general practitioners on vaccine coverage of their patients at risk.MethodsA questionnaire was sent in March 2012 to a sample of 500 general practitioners. Their professional characteristics, vaccination status against seasonal influenza and the determinants of these vaccinations were collected and compared to the vaccine coverage of their patients obtained from the French healthcare fund.ResultsSelf-reported vaccination coverage of the 225 general practitioners respondents was 81.3%. There was a positive correlation with age greater than 50 years, high activity level, rural practice and the absence of particular mode of exercise. The doctors wanted to be vaccinated to protect themselves and protect their patients or their family. Of the 42 doctors unvaccinated, 42.5% feared the side effects of the vaccine, 40% considered influenza to be a benign illness and 32.5% considered low risk of catching or spreading it. The vaccination rate for patients aged 65 and older was 62.3% among 147 doctors vaccinated versus 58.3% in unvaccinated 31 physicians (P < 0.0001). These rates were 39% versus 36.7% (P = 0.29) for patients with chronic targeted disorders.ConclusionThis study shows a positive association between the reported vaccination of general practitioners and effective influenza vaccination of their patients aged 65 years and older. This result is less clear for patients with chronic targeted disorders. All this findings argue in favor of promoting seasonal influenza vaccination among general practitioners.     

Rates and correlates of influenza vaccination among HIV-infected adults in the HIV Outpatient Study (HOPS), USA, 1999-2008

BackgroundWe sought to describe rates of vaccination among HIV-infected adults in care and identify factors associated with vaccination.MethodsUsing data abstracted from medical records of participants in the HIV Outpatient Study (HOPS) during 8 influenza seasons (1999–2008) and negative binomial models with generalized estimating equation methods, we examined factors associated with increased prevalence of annual influenza vaccination.ResultsAmong active patients, 25.8% to 43.3% were vaccinated for influenza each year (annual mean = 35%, test for trend p = 0.71). Vaccination rates peaked in October and November of each season and decreased sharply thereafter. In multivariable analysis, patients who were male (67.2%), non-Hispanic white (70%) or Hispanic (66%), had lower HIV viral loads (73.5%), were prescribed antiretroviral treatment (72.7%), or had a greater number of clinical encounters per year (86.7%) were more likely to receive influenza vaccination.DiscussionThe decreased likelihood of vaccination among women and non-Hispanic black patients suggests the need for focused efforts to reduce disparities. Increasing patient and clinician education on the importance of universal vaccination, and ensuring that vaccination activities continue in HIV clinics during the later months of the influenza season may improve influenza vaccine coverage.     

Moving the needle on nursing staff influenza vaccination in long-term care: Results of an evidence-based intervention

PurposeInfluenza vaccination rates among healthcare providers (HCPs) in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are commonly below the Healthy People 2020 goal of 90%. This study was conducted to develop and evaluate an intervention program designed to increase influenza uptake among HCPs in LTCFs.MethodsThis study was conducted in four Midwestern LTCFs. Baseline interviews, surveys, and administrative data analysis were performed following the 2013–2014 influenza season. Interventions implemented during the 2014–2015 season were based on the health belief and ecological models and included goal-setting worksheets, policy development, educational programs, kick-off events, incentives, a vaccination tracking roster, and facility-wide communication about vaccine uptake among HCPs. Outcomes were evaluated in 2015.ResultsAt baseline, 50% of 726 nursing staff employed during the 2013–2014 influenza season had documented receipt of influenza vaccine (Site A: 34%; Site B: 5%; Site C: 75%; Site D: 62%), and 31% of 347 survey respondents reported absenteeism due to respiratory illness. At follow-up, 85% of HCPs had documented receipt of influenza vaccine (p < 0.01) and 19% of 323 survey respondents reported absenteeism due to respiratory illness (p < 0.01). Vaccination rates among respondents’ family members increased from 31% at baseline to 44% post-intervention (p < 0.01). Reasons for declining vaccination did not change following exposure to educational programs, but HCPs were more likely to recommend vaccination to others after program implementation.ConclusionsVaccination rates among long-term care HCPs and their family members increased significantly and HCP absenteeism decreased after the implementation of multifaceted interventions based on an ecological model. The findings suggest that major increases in HCP vaccination can be achieved in LTCFs. More research is needed to evaluate the impact of increased HCP vaccination on the health and productivity of LTCF employees, their family members, and residents.     

Improving influenza and Tdap vaccination during pregnancy: A cluster-randomized trial of a multi-component antenatal vaccine promotion package in late influenza season

BackgroundEvidence-based interventions to improve influenza vaccine coverage among pregnant women are needed, particularly among those who remain unvaccinated late into the influenza season. Improving rates of antenatal tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination is also needed.PurposeTo test the effectiveness of a practice-, provider-, and patient-focused influenza and Tdap vaccine promotion package on improving antenatal influenza and Tdap vaccination in the obstetric setting.MethodsA cluster-randomized trial among 11 obstetric practices in Georgia was conducted in 2012–2013. Intervention practices adopted the intervention package that included identification of a vaccine champion, provider-to-patient talking points, educational brochures, posters, lapel buttons, and iPads loaded with a patient-centered tutorial. Participants were recruited from December 2012–April 2013 and included 325 unvaccinated pregnant women in Georgia. Random effects regression models were used to evaluate primary and secondary outcomes.ResultsData on antenatal influenza and Tdap vaccine receipt were obtained for 300 (92.3%) and 291 (89.5%) women, respectively. Although antenatal influenza and Tdap vaccination rates were higher in the intervention group than the control group, improvements were not significant (For influenza: risk difference (RD) = 3.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI): −4.0%, 11.2%; for Tdap: RD = 1.3%, 95% CI: −10.7%, 13.2%). While the majority of intervention package components were positively associated with antenatal vaccine receipt, a provider's recommendation was the factor most strongly associated with actual receipt, regardless of study group or vaccine.ConclusionsThe intervention package did not significantly improve antenatal influenza or Tdap vaccine coverage. More research is needed to determine what motivates women remaining unvaccinated against influenza late into the influenza season to get vaccinated. Future research should quantify the extent to which clinical interventions can bolster a provider's recommendation for vaccination. This study is registered with clinicaltrials.gov, study ID NCT01761799.     

Comparison of influenza vaccination coverage between immigrant and Australian-born adults

Australia has a large immigrant population but there are few data regarding whether influenza vaccine coverage in adults varies according to country of birth. We quantified and compared self-reported influenza vaccination coverage between Australian-born and immigrant residents aged ⩾49 years enrolled in a large cohort (the 45 and Up Study), surveyed in 2012 and 2013. Estimated vaccine coverage was adjusted for age, sex and other factors known to be associated with vaccine uptake. Among 76,040 participants included in the analyses (mean age 66.2 years), 21.6% were immigrants. In Australian-born adults aged 49–64 and 65+ years the age- and sex-adjusted estimates for influenza vaccination within the year prior to survey was 39.5% (95% CI 38.9–40.0) and 70.9% (70.4–71.5) respectively. The corresponding estimates in immigrants were significantly lower at 34.8% (33.7–35.8) and 64.4% (63.4–65.4) respectively. Among immigrants, coverage varied by region of birth, and was slightly lower among those who spoke a language other than English at home compared to those who only spoke English. Among immigrants there was no significant difference in coverage comparing those who migrated when they were children to those who migrated as adults and coverage did not differ significantly according to years lived in Australia. Programs to increase adult vaccination coverage should consider the needs of immigrants.     

Correlates of receiving recommended adolescent vaccines among youth with special health care needs: Findings from a statewide survey

BackgroundMany youth with special health care needs (YSHCN) have not received recommended adolescent vaccines, yet data are lacking on correlates of vaccination among this population. Such information can identify subgroups of YSHCN that may be at risk for under-immunization and strategies for increasing vaccination.MethodsWe analyzed weighted data from a population-based sample of parents with an 11- to 17-year-old child with a special health care need from the 2010–2012 North Carolina Child Health Assessment and Monitoring Program (n = 604). We used ordinal logistic regression to identify correlates of how many recommended vaccines (tetanus booster, meningococcal, and HPV [at least one dose] vaccines) adolescents had received.ResultsOnly 12% of YSHCN (18% of females and 7% of males) had received all three vaccines. More YSHCN had received tetanus booster vaccine (91%) than meningococcal (28%) or HPV vaccines (32%). In multivariable analyses, YSHCN who were female (OR = 2.59, 95% CI: 1.57–4.24), ages 16–17 (OR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.10–3.87), or who had a preventive check-up in the past year (OR = 2.98, 95% CI: 1.24–7.21) had received a greater number of the vaccines. YSHCN from households that contained a person with at least some college education had received fewer of the vaccines (OR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.33–0.96). Vaccine coverage did not differ by type of special health care need.ConclusionsVaccine coverage among YSHCN is lacking and particularly low among those who are younger or male. Reducing missed opportunities for vaccination at medical visits and concomitant administration of adolescent vaccines may help increase vaccine coverage among YSHCN.     

A global review of national influenza immunization policies: Analysis of the 2014 WHO/UNICEF Joint Reporting Form on immunization

IntroductionThe WHO recommends annual influenza vaccination to prevent influenza illness in high-risk groups. Little is known about national influenza immunization policies globally.Material and MethodsThe 2014 WHO/UNICEF Joint Reporting Form (JRF) on Immunization was adapted to capture data on influenza immunization policies. We combined this dataset with additional JRF information on new vaccine introductions and strength of immunization programmes, as well as publicly available data on country economic status. Data from countries that did not complete the JRF were sought through additional sources. We described data on country influenza immunization policies and used bivariate analyses to identify factors associated with having such policies.ResultsOf 194 WHO Member States, 115 (59%) reported having a national influenza immunization policy in 2014. Among countries with a national policy, programmes target specific WHO-defined risk groups, including pregnant women (42%), young children (28%), adults with chronic illnesses (46%), the elderly (45%), and health care workers (47%). The Americas, Europe, and Western Pacific were the WHO regions that had the highest percentages of countries reporting that they had national influenza immunization policies. Compared to countries without policies, countries with policies were significantly more likely to have the following characteristics: to be high or upper middle income (p < 0.0001); to have introduced birth dose hepatitis B virus vaccine (p < 0.0001), pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (p = 0.032), or human papilloma virus vaccine (p = 0.002); to have achieved global goals for diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine coverage (p < 0.0001); and to have a functioning National Immunization Technical Advisory Group (p < 0.0001).ConclusionsThe 2014 revision of the JRF permitted a global assessment of national influenza immunization policies. The 59% of countries reporting that they had policies are wealthier, use more new or under-utilized vaccines, and have stronger immunization systems. Addressing disparities in public health resources and strengthening immunization systems may facilitate influenza vaccine introduction and use.     

Seasonal influenza vaccination in China: Landscape of diverse regional reimbursement policy,and budget impact analysis

BackgroundTo explore the current landscape of seasonal influenza vaccination across China, and estimate the budget of implementing a national “free-at-the-point-of-care” vaccination program for priority populations recommended by the World Health Organization.MethodsIn 2014 and 2016, we conducted a survey across provincial Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to collect information on regional reimbursement policies for influenza vaccination, estimated the national uptake using distributed doses of influenza vaccines, and evaluated the budget using population size and vaccine cost obtained from official websites and literatures.ResultsRegular reimbursement policies for influenza vaccination are available in 61 mutually exclusive regions, comprising 8 provinces, 45 prefectures, and 8 counties, which were reimbursed by the local Government Financial Department or Basic Social Medical Insurance (BSMI). Finance-reimbursed vaccination was offered mainly for the elderly, and school children for free in Beijing, Dongli district in Tianjin, Karamay, Shenzhen and Xinxiang cities. BSMI-reimbursement policies were limited to specific medical insurance beneficiaries with distinct differences in the reimbursement fractions. The average national vaccination coverage was just 1.5–2.2% between 2004 and 2014. A free national vaccination program for priority populations (n = 416 million), would cost government US$ 757 million (95% CI 726–789) annually (uptake rate = 20%).ConclusionsAn increasing number of regional governments have begun to pay, partially or fully, for influenza vaccination for selected groups. However, this small-scale policy approach has failed to increase national uptake. A free, nationwide vaccination program would require a substantial annual investment. A cost-effectiveness analysis is needed to identify the most efficient methods to improve coverage.     

Relationship between Guillain–Barré syndrome,influenza-related hospitalizations,and influenza vaccine coverage

Some studies reported an increased risk of Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS) within six weeks of influenza vaccination. It has also been suggested that this finding could have been confounded by influenza illnesses. We explored the complex relationship between influenza illness, influenza vaccination, and GBS, from an ecologic perspective using nationally representative data. We also studied seasonal patterns for GBS hospitalizations.Monthly hospitalization data (2000–2009) for GBS, and pneumonia and influenza (P&I) in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample were included. Seasonal influenza vaccination coverage for 2004–2005 through the 2008–2009 influenza seasons (August–May) was estimated from the National Health Interview Survey data. GBS seasonality was determined using Poisson regression. GBS and P&I temporal clusters were identified using scan statistics. The association between P&I and GBS hospitalizations in the same month (concurrent) or in the following month (lagged) were determined using negative binomial regression.Vaccine coverage increased over the years (from 19.7% during 2004–2005 to 35.5% during 2008–2009 season) but GBS hospitalization did not follow a similar pattern. Overall, a significant correlation between monthly P&I and GBS hospitalizations was observed (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.7016, p < 0.0001). A significant (p = 0.001) cluster of P&I hospitalizations during December 2004–March 2005 overlapped a significant (p = 0.001) cluster of GBS hospitalizations during January 2005–February 2005. After accounting for effects of monthly vaccine coverage and age, P&I hospitalization was significantly associated (p < 0.0001) with GBS hospitalization in the concurrent month but not with GBS hospitalization in the following month. Monthly vaccine coverage was not associated with GBS hospitalization in adjusted models (both concurrent and lagged). GBS hospitalizations demonstrated a seasonal pattern with winter months having higher rates compared to the month of June.P&I hospitalization rates were significantly correlated with hospitalization rates for GBS. Vaccine coverage did not significantly affect the rates of GBS hospitalization at the population level.