A Japanese study to assess immunogenicity and safety of a typhoid Vi polysaccharide vaccine

BackgroundAlthough typhoid fever is rare in Japan, imported cases have been reported occasionally in travelers returning from endemic areas. To achieve licensing of a typhoid Vi polysaccharide vaccine (Typhim Vi^®) and make it widely available in Japan, this study was conducted at the request of the Japanese Ministry of Health Labor and Welfare to assess the immunogenicity and safety of this vaccine when given as a single dose (the recommended schedule of administration) in a Japanese population.MethodsIn this multi-center, open-label, non-comparative, intervention study performed in Japan, 200 healthy volunteers (188 adults [≥18 years of age], 7 adolescents [12–17 years of age] and 5 children [2–11 years of age]) were administered Typhim Vi^®. Immunogenicity was assessed 28 days after vaccinations using an ELISA method of anti-Vi antibody detection. A 4-fold increase in anti-Vi titer was considered as the threshold for seroconversion for anti-Vi antibodies. Safety was assessed up to 28 days following vaccination.ResultsOverall, 92.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 87.3–95.4%) of participants achieved seroconversion 28 days after a single dose of typhoid Vi polysaccharide vaccine. GMTs of Vi antibody titers increased from 6.6 (95% CI: 5.8–7.4) prior to vaccination to 157.3 (95% CI: 135.1–183.2) on Day 28 after vaccination. The geometric mean of individual anti-Vi antibody titer ratios (Day 28/Day 0) was 23.9 (95% CI: 20.3–28.3). There were no immediate adverse events and no adverse events led to the discontinuation of participants from the study. Across all age groups, pain and myalgia were the most frequently reported injection site and systemic reactions, respectively. Most of these reactions were mild in intensity and resolved within 7 days.ConclusionsA single dose of typhoid Vi polysaccharide vaccine, Typhim Vi^®, demonstrated good safety and immunogenicity profile in a Japanese population.     

Phase I,randomized, observer-blind,placebo-controlled studies to evaluate the safety,reactogenicity and immunogenicity of an investigational non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) protein vaccine in adults

BackgroundNon-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) is a major cause of various respiratory diseases. The development of an effective vaccine against NTHi mandates new approaches beyond conjugated vaccines as this opportunistic bacterium is non-encapsulated. Here we report on the safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of a multi-component investigational vaccine based on three conserved surface proteins from NTHi (proteins D [PD], E [PE] and Pilin A [PilA]) in two observer-blind phase I studies.MethodsIn the first study (NCT01657526), 48 healthy 18–40 year-olds received two vaccine formulations (10 or 30 μg of each antigen [PD and a fusion protein PE-PilA]) or saline placebo at months 0 and 2. In the second study (NCT01678677), 270 50–70 year-olds, current or former smokers, received eight vaccine formulations (10 or 30 μg antigen/dose non-adjuvanted or adjuvanted with alum, AS01_E or AS04_C) or saline placebo at months 0, 2 and 6 (plain and alum-adjuvanted groups) and at months 0 and 2 (AS-adjuvanted groups). Solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were recorded for 7 and 30 days post-vaccination, respectively; potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) and serious AEs (SAEs) throughout the studies. Humoral and antigen-specific T-cell immunity (in study 2 only) responses were assessed up to 12 months post-vaccination.ResultsObserved reactogenicity was highest in the AS-adjuvanted groups but no safety concerns were identified with any of the NTHi vaccine formulations. One fatal SAE (cardiac arrest) not considered related to vaccination, and one pIMD (non-serious psoriasis) in the Placebo group, were reported post-dose 3 in Study 2. All formulations generated a robust antibody response while the AS01-adjuvanted formulations produced the highest humoral and cellular immune responses.ConclusionThis study confirms that the NTHi vaccine formulations had an acceptable reactogenicity and safety profile and were immunogenic in adults. These results justify further clinical development of this NTHi vaccine candidate.     

Lot-to-lot consistency,safety and immunogenicity of 3 lots of Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine: results from a phase III randomized,multicenter study in infants

BackgroundVaccination against Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) is included in routine pediatric immunization schedule in the United States. Previous vaccine shortages have created the need for additional options for Hib vaccination.MethodsThis phase III, randomized, multi-centered study (NCT01000974) evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of a monovalent tetanus toxoid-conjugate Hib vaccine (Hib-TT) compared to a monovalent (Hib-TT control) and a combination Hib-TT vaccine. We hierarchically assessed lot-to-lot consistency of 3 Hib-TT lots and non-inferiority of Hib-TT to Hib-TT control. We co-administered routine pediatric vaccines with Hib-TT vaccines at 2, 4, 6 months (primary vaccination) and 15–18 months of age (booster vaccination). We recorded adverse events (AEs) for 4 (solicited) and 31 days (unsolicited) post-vaccination and serious AEs (SAEs) throughout the study.ResultsOf 4009 enrolled children, 3086 completed booster phase. Lot-to-lot consistency was not demonstrated. The study met statistical criteria for non-inferiority of Hib-TT to Hib-TT control in terms of immune responses to Hib and co-administered vaccines’ antigens, but not in terms of participants achieving post-primary vaccination anti-PRP levels ≥1 µg/mL. Because of the hierarchical nature of the objectives, non-inferiority could not be established. In all groups, 92.5–96.7% and 99.6–100% of participants achieved anti-PRP levels ≥0.15 µg/mL, while 78.3–89.8% and 97.9–99.1% had anti-PRP levels ≥1 µg/mL, post-primary and post-booster vaccination, respectively. Immune responses to co-administered vaccines and reported incidence of AEs were comparable among groups. We recorded SAEs for 107/2963 (3.6%), 24/520 (4.6%), and 21/520 (4.0%) children post-primary vaccination, and 29/2337 (1.2%), 4/435 (0.9%), and 2/400 (0.5%) children post-booster vaccination with Hib-TT, Hib-TT control and combination Hib-TT vaccine, respectively; 6/5330 (0.1%) SAEs in the Hib-TT groups were considered vaccine-related.ConclusionHib-TT induced seroprotective antibody concentrations in the majority of participants and was well-tolerated when co-administered with routine pediatric vaccines according to a 3 + 1 schedule.     

Safety,immunogenicity, and lot-to-lot consistency of a quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in children,adolescents, and adults: A randomized,controlled, phase III trial

BackgroundInactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine (IIV4) containing two influenza A strains and one strain from each B lineage (Yamagata and Victoria) may offer broader protection against seasonal influenza than inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine (IIV3), containing a single B strain. This study examined the safety, immunogenicity, and lot consistency of an IIV4 candidate.MethodsThis phase III, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial in children/adolescents (9 through 17 years) and adults (18 through 60 years) was conducted in Australia and in the Philippines in 2012. The study was double-blind for IIV4 lots and open-label for IIV4 vs IIV3. Children/adolescents were randomized 2:2:2:1 and adults 10:10:10:1 to receive one of three lots of IIV4 or licensed IIV3. Safety data were collected for up to 6 months post-vaccination. Hemagglutination inhibition and seroneutralization antibody titers were assessed pre-vaccination and 21 days post-vaccination.Results1648 adults and 329 children/adolescents received IIV4, and 56 adults and 55 children/adolescents received IIV3. Solicited reactions, unsolicited adverse events, and serious adverse events were similar for IIV3 and IIV4 recipients in both age groups. Injection-site pain, headache, malaise, and myalgia were the most frequently reported solicited reactions, most of which were mild and resolved within 3 days. No vaccine-related serious adverse events or deaths were reported. Post-vaccination antibody responses, seroconversion rates, and seroprotection rates for the 3 strains common to both vaccines were comparable for IIV3 and IIV4 in both age groups. Antibody responses to IIV4 were equivalent among vaccine lots and comparable between age groups for each of the 4 strains. IIV4 met all European Medicines Agency immunogenicity criteria for adults for all 4 strains.ConclusionsIn both age groups, IIV4 was well tolerated and caused no safety concerns, induced robust antibody responses to all 4 influenza strains, and met all EMA immunogenicity criteria for adults.Clinical trial registry numberNCT01481454.     

Safety and tolerability of a cell culture derived trivalent subunit inactivated influenza vaccine administered to healthy children and adolescents: A Phase III,randomized, multicenter,observer-blind study

BackgroundCell culture-derived inactivated influenza vaccines (TIVc) are necessary for scale and predictability of production to meet global demand. This study compared the safety and tolerability of TIVc with an egg-derived trivalent influenza vaccine (TIVf) in 4–17 yearolds.MethodsA Phase 3 observer blind, multicenter study enrolled 2055 healthy participants randomized 2:1 to receive either TIVc or TIVf, respectively (1372 TIVc and 683 TIVf evaluable subjects). Participants received one dose each on Days 1 and 28 (4–8 year-olds not previously vaccinated [NPV]) or one dose on Day 1 (4–8 and 9–17 yearolds previously vaccinated [PV]). Solicited adverse events (AEs) occurring within 7 days after each vaccination were assessed; participants were followed up for 6 months after their last dose for safety.ResultsMost solicited and unsolicited AEs were mild to moderate with <1% in the severe category. No withdrawals due to AEs, deaths or vaccine-related SAEs were reported. TIVc and TIVf were similar in percentages of participants reporting solicited reactions in 4–8 years NPV group after the 1st dose: local reactions, TIVc: 48%, TIVf: 43%; systemic reactions, TIVc: 34%, TIVf: 32%; percentages were lower following the 2nd dose in TIVc; local reactions: TIVc: 40%; TIVf: 43%; systemic reactions: TIVc: 21%; TIVf: 22%. In 4–17 years PV group, solicited reactions were lower following TIVf, local reactions: TIVc: 53%; TIVf: 43%; systemic reactions: TIVc: 37%, TIVf: 30%. Injection-site pain was the most common solicited reaction, and was similar following TIVc and TIVf in 4–8 yearolds (TIVc: 56%; TIVf: 55%), and lower following TIVf in 9–17 years group (TIVc: 52%; TIVf: 42%). Reporting of unsolicited AEs was similar for TIVc and TIVf across the two age groups.ConclusionTIVc was well tolerated and had a safety and reactogenicity profile similar to that of TIVf in healthy 4–17 yearolds (NCT01857206).     

Results from a preclinical study in rodents and a Phase 1/2, randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled,parallel-group study of COVID-19 vaccine S-268019-a in Japanese adults

BackgroundIn early 2020, developing vaccines was an urgent need for preventing COVID-19 from a contingency perspective.MethodsS-268019-a is a recombinant protein-based vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), comprising a modified recombinant spike protein antigen adjuvanted with agatolimod sodium, a Toll-like receptor-9 agonist. In the preclinical phase, it was administered intramuscularly twice at a 2-week interval in 7-week-old mice. Immunogenicity was assessed, and the mice were challenged intranasally with mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 at 2 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the second immunization. After confirming the preclinical effect, a Phase 1/2, randomized, parallel-group clinical study was conducted in healthy adults (aged 20–64 years). All participants received 2 intramuscular injections at various combinations of the antigen and the adjuvant (S-910823/agatolimod sodium, in μg: 12.5/250, 25/250, 50/250, 25/500, 50/500, 100/500, 10/500, 100/100, 200/1000) or placebo (saline) in an equivalent volume at a 3-week interval and were followed up until Day 50 in this interim analysis.ResultsIn the preclinical studies, S-268019-a was safe and elicited robust immunoglobulin G (IgG) and neutralizing antibody responses in mice. When challenged with SARS-CoV-2, all S-268019-a-treated mice survived and maintained weight until 10 days, whereas all placebo- or adjuvant-treated (without antigen) mice died within 6 days. In the Phase 1/2 trial, although S-268019-a was well tolerated in adult participants, was safe up to Day 50, and elicited robust anti-spike protein IgG antibodies, it did not elicit sufficient neutralizing antibody levels.ConclusionsThe S-268019-a vaccine was not sufficiently immunogenic in Japanese adults despite robust immunogenicity and efficacy in mice. Our results exemplify the innate challenges in translating preclinical data in animals to clinical trials, and highlight the need for continued research to overcome such barriers. (jRCT2051200092)     

Post-licensure,phase IV,safety study of a live attenuated Japanese encephalitis recombinant vaccine in children in Thailand

BackgroundJapanese encephalitis is a mosquito-borne viral disease endemic in most countries in Asia. A recombinant live, attenuated Japanese encephalitis virus vaccine, JE-CV, is licensed in 14 countries, including Thailand, for the prevention of Japanese encephalitis in adults and children.MethodsThis was a prospective, phase IV, open-label, multicentre, safety study of JE-CV conducted from November 2013 to April 2015, to evaluate rare serious adverse events (AEs). JE-CV was administered to 10,000 healthy children aged 9 months to <5 years in Thailand as a primary (Group 1) or booster (Group 2) vaccination. Serious AEs (SAEs), including AEs of special interest, up to 60 days after administration were evaluated. Immediate Grade 3 systemic AEs up to 30 min after JE-CV administration were also described.ResultsThe median age of participants was 1.1 years in Group 1 and 3.8 years in Group 2. SAEs were reported in 204 (3.0%) participants in Group 1 and 59 (1.9%) participants in Group 2. Among a total of 294 SAEs in 263 participants, only three events occurring in two participants were considered related to vaccination. All three cases were moderate urticaria, none of which met the definition of AEs of special interest for hypersensitivity. AEs of special interest were reported in 28 (0.4%) participants in Group 1 and 4 (0.1%) participants in Group 2; none were considered related to vaccination. Febrile convulsion was the most frequently reported AE of special interest: 25 (0.4%) participants in Group 1; and 2 (<0.1%) in Group 2. There were no cases of Japanese encephalitis reported. No Grade 3 immediate systemic AEs were reported after any JE-CV vaccination.ConclusionsOur study did not identify any new safety concerns with JE-CV and confirms its good safety profile.This study was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01981967; Universal Trial Number: U1111-1127-7052).     

A Phase III open-label,randomized, active controlled clinical study to assess safety,immunogenicity and lot-to-lot consistency of a bovine-human reassortant pentavalent rotavirus vaccine in Indian infants

BackgroundA heat-stable bovine-human rotavirus reassortant pentavalent vaccine (BRV-PV, ROTASIIL®) was developed in India. In this study, the vaccine was tested for safety, immunogenicity and clinical lot-to-lot consistency.MethodsThis was a Phase III, open label, randomized, equivalence design study. The primary objective was to demonstrate lot-to-lot consistency of BRV-PV. Subjects were randomized into four arms, three arms received Lots A, B, and C of BRV-PV and the control arm, received Rotarix®. Three doses of BRV-PV or two doses of Rotarix® and one dose of placebo were given at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age. Blood samples were collected four weeks after the third dose to assess rotavirus IgA antibody levels. The three lots of BRV-PV were equivalent if the 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean concentration (GMC) ratios were between 0.5 and 2. Solicited reactions were collected by using diary cards.ResultsThe study was conducted in 1500 randomized infants, of which 1341 infants completed the study. The IgA GMC ratios among the three lots were around 1 (Lot A versus Lot B: 1.07; Lot A versus Lot C: 1.06; and Lot B versus Lot C: 0.99). The 95% CIs for the GMC ratios were between 0.78 and 1.36. The IgA GMCs were: BRV-PV group 19.16 (95% CI 17.37–21.14) and Rotarix® group 10.92 (95% CI 9.36–12.74) (GMC ratio 1.75; 90% CI 1.51–2.04). Seropositivity rates were 46.98% (95% CI 43.86–50.11) and 31.12% (95% CI 26.17–36.41). The incidence of solicited reactions was comparable across the four arms. No serious adverse events were associated with the study vaccines, except two gastroenteritis events in the BRV-PV groups.ConclusionLot-to-lot consistency of BRV-PV was demonstrated in terms of GMC ratios of IgA antibodies. The vaccine safety and immunogenicity profiles were similar to those of Rotarix®.Clinical Trials.Gov [NCT02584816] and Clinical Trial Registry of India [CTRI/2015/07/006034].     

A phase III randomized, controlled study to assess the immunogenicity and tolerability of DTPw-HBV-Hib, a liquid pentavalent vaccine in Indian infants

Immunogenicity and tolerability of two liquid pentavalent vaccines, Pentavac^® (new vaccine), and Easyfive^® (available in the market) was assessed in a multicentre study in India. In all, 484 infants aged 6-8 weeks were enrolled, and their blood samples were assessed prior to the first dose and one month after the third dose. A 100% seroprotection rate was achieved with both vaccines’ antigens, except pertussis for which the response was 95% and 96%, respectively, for the two vaccines. A diary-based recording of adverse events showed that the two most common events were pain at the injection site and restricted limb movements and were less frequent (p < 0.001) among the recipients of the new vaccine. The new vaccine meets all criteria of childhood vaccination. Its low reactogenicity and low cost are valid reasons to recommend this vaccine for general use.     

The immunogenicity and safety of a tetravalent measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine when co-administered with conjugated meningococcal C vaccine to healthy children: A phase IIIb,randomized, multi-center study in Italy

IntroductionMultiple vaccination visits and administrations can be stressful for infants, parents and healthcare providers. Multivalent combination vaccines can deliver the required number of antigens in fewer injections and clinic visits, while vaccine co-administration can also reduce the number of visits. This non-inferiority study was undertaken to evaluate the feasibility of co-administering a combined measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (MMRV) vaccine with conjugated meningococcal C (MenC) vaccine in a large cohort of healthy Italian toddlers.MethodsHealthy subjects aged 13–15 months were randomized (2:1:1) to receive single doses of either: co-administered MMRV + MenC at the same visit (MMRV + MenC group); or MMRV followed 42 days later by MenC (MMRV group); or MenC followed 42 days later by MMRV (MenC group). Blood samples were collected before and 43 days after vaccination. Antibody titers against MMRV were measured using ELISA. Functional-anti-meningococcal-serogroup activity (rSBAMenC) was assessed using a serum bactericidal test. Solicited local and general reactions were recorded for up to 4 and 42 days post-vaccination, respectively. Non-inferiority of MMRV + MenC to MMRV (post-dose-1 seroconversion rates) and MMRV + MenC to MenC (post-dose-1 seroprotection rates) was achieved if the lower limit (LL) of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the group difference was ⩾−10% for each antigen.Results716 subjects were enrolled in the study. At 42 days post-vaccination, the MMRV seroconversion rates were 99.3% (measles), 94.5% (mumps), 100% (rubella) and 99.7% (varicella) in the MMRV + MenC group, and 99.4%, 93.2%, 100% and 100%, respectively, in the MMRV group. The seroprotection rates against rSBA-MenC were 98.3% in the MMRV + MenC group and 99.3% in the MenC group. Non-inferiority was reached for all the vaccine antigens. The safety profiles were as expected for these vaccines.ConclusionThe immune responses elicited by co-administered MMRV + MenC were non-inferior to those elicited by MMRV or MenC alone and support vaccination of children with both vaccines at a single visit.Clinical Trials registration: NCT01506193.     

A phase 3, multicenter,randomized, double-blind,active-comparator-controlled study to evaluate the safety,tolerability, and immunogenicity of a 4-dose regimen of V114, a 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine,in healthy infants (PNEU-PED)

BackgroundPneumococcal disease (PD) remains a major health concern with considerable morbidity and mortality in children. Currently licensed pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) confer protection against PD caused by most vaccine serotypes, but non-vaccine serotypes contribute to residual disease. V114 is a 15-valent PCV containing all 13 serotypes in Prevnar 13? (PCV13) and additional serotypes 22F and 33F. This pivotal phase 3 study compared safety and immunogenicity of V114 and PCV13.Methods1720 healthy infants were randomized 1:1 to receive a 4-dose regimen of V114 or PCV13 concomitantly with other routine pediatric vaccines. Safety was evaluated after each dose as proportion of participants with adverse events (AEs). Serotype-specific anti-pneumococcal immunoglobulin G (IgG) was measured at 1-month post-dose 3 (PD3), pre-dose 4, and 1-month post-dose 4 (PD4). IgG response rates, geometric mean concentrations (GMCs), and opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) were compared between vaccination groups.ResultsThe proportion, maximum intensity, and duration of injection-site, systemic, and serious AEs were generally comparable between V114 and PCV13 groups. In comparison to PCV13, V114 met non-inferiority criteria for all 15 serotypes based on IgG response rates at PD3. V114 met non-inferiority criteria by IgG GMCs for all serotypes at PD3 and PD4, except for serotype 6A at PD3. V114-induced antibodies had bactericidal activity as assessed by OPA. Further, V114 met superiority criteria for shared serotype 3 and unique serotypes 22F and 33F compared to PCV13 by serotype-specific IgG GMCs at both PD3 and PD4. Immunogenicity of concomitantly administered routine pediatric vaccines was comparable in V114 and PCV13 groups.ConclusionsIn healthy infants, V114 displays acceptable safety and tolerability profiles and generates comparable immune responses to PCV13. V114 also met superiority criteria for serotypes 3, 22F, and 33F. These results support use of V114 for prevention of PD as part of routine infant vaccination schedules.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03893448; EudraCT: 2018-004109-21.     

Immunogenicity and safety of a quadrivalent inactivated influenza virus vaccine compared with a comparator quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in a pediatric population: A phase 3, randomized noninferiority study

BackgroundSeqirus 2010 Southern Hemisphere split-virion trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3) was associated with increased febrile reactions in children. Studies in vitro concluded that increasing concentrations of splitting agent decreased residual lipids and attenuated proinflammatory cytokine signals associated with fever. We assessed immunogenicity and safety of a quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4; produced using higher concentration of splitting agent) versus a United States-licensed comparator IIV4 in healthy children aged 5–17 years.MethodsParticipants (N = 2278) were randomized 3:1 and stratified by age (5–8 years; 9–17 years) to receive IIV4 (n = 1709) or comparator IIV4 (n = 569). Primary objective was to demonstrate noninferiority of IIV4 versus comparator IIV4 as assessed by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) geometric mean titer (GMT) ratio (upper bound of two-sided 95% confidence interval [CI] ≤ 1.5) and difference in seroconversion rate (upper bound of two-sided 95% CI ≤ 10%) for all four vaccine strains. HI antibody titers were assessed at baseline and 28 days postvaccination. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events were assessed during each 7- and 28-day postvaccination period, respectively.ResultsIIV4 met immunogenicity criteria for noninferiority. Adjusted GMT ratios (comparator IIV4/IIV4) for A/H1N1, A/H3N2, B/Yamagata, and B/Victoria strains were 1.01 (95% CI; 0.93, 1.09), 1.05 (0.96, 1.15), 0.89 (0.81, 0.98), and 0.92 (0.83, 1.02), respectively. Corresponding values for differences (95% CI) in seroconversion rates (comparator IIV4 minus IIV4) were −3.1 (−8.0, 1.8), 0.4 (−4.5, 5.3), −3.4 (−8.3, 1.5), and −2.0 (−6.9, 2.9). Fever rates were numerically higher, but not statistically different, with IIV4 versus comparator IIV4. No new safety signals were reported.ConclusionIIV4 demonstrated immunological noninferiority to the comparator IIV4 with a clinically acceptable safety profile in children aged 5–17 years. Increased levels of virus splitting agent seem to have reduced fever rates observed in children with Seqirus IIV3, particularly those aged 5–8 years.Funding: Seqirus Pty Ltd; Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02545543.     

A phase III, randomized controlled study to assess the safety and immunogenicity of a semi-synthetic diphtheria, tetanus and whole-cell pertussis vaccine in Indian infants

Background

Reactions to DTwP vaccine are well known and are a matter of great concern, much for the development of next generation combination vaccines. To avoid such reactions which occur from foreign compounds, WHO suggested manufacture of DTwP vaccine using semi-synthetic medium. The phase III trial reported here was conducted to assess the immunogenicity, tolerability and safety of a new DTwP vaccine manufactured using semi-synthetic medium for both tetanus and diphtheria toxoids in comparison with the routinely manufactured DTwP vaccine.

Methods

In all, 331 infants aged 6–8 weeks were enrolled, out of which 308 completed the study. The vaccination was done at 6-10-14 weeks following EPI/WHO recommended immunization schedule. Blood samples were collected prior to the administration of first dose and one month after the third dose.

Results

Postvaccination, geometric mean titres for each component did not differ significantly amongst the two study groups. Though, the immunogenicity results were comparable between the two vaccines, the incidence of adverse events was comparatively low in semi-synthetic vaccine as against the routine vaccine group for all the three doses.

Conclusions

The semi-synthetic DTwP vaccine was immunogenic and showed a significant lower incidence of local adverse events in comparison to the routine vaccine. This vaccine is now being used in the routine vaccination programme both as a triple antigen (DTwP alone) as well as a combination with Hepatitis B and/or Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine.     

A phase III observer-blind randomized,controlled study to evaluate the immune response and the correlation with nasopharyngeal carriage after immunization of university students with a quadrivalent meningococcal ACWY glycoconjugate or serogroup B meningococcal vaccine

BackgroundUniversity students have high rates of pharyngeal carriage of Neisseria meningitidis. Interruption of carriage acquisition is an important mechanism of vaccines for inducing herd protection. 4CMenB and MenACWY-CRM vaccines have been shown to be immunogenic against meningococcal serogroups B and ACWY respectively in younger age groups, and also to elicit a modest impact on meningococcal carriage in vaccinated students. However, vaccine responses in university students and the impact of serum bactericidal antibody (SBA) titers on meningococcal carriage are undetermined.MethodsImmunogenicity of two 4CMenB doses or one MenACWY-CRM dose was measured in university students at Months 2, 4, 6 and 12 post-first vaccination. Immunogenicity of one MenACWY-CRM dose in students with previous meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccination was also assessed. Immune responses were measured with an SBA assay using human complement (hSBA) against three reference strains for serogroup B and against one strain for each for serogroups C and Y. Correlations between hSBA titers and meningococcal carriage were analyzed.ResultsAll subjects demonstrated robust functional antibody responses to both vaccines at Month 2 and a high proportion maintained protective hSBA titers up to Month 12. At baseline, carriage of disease-associated serogroup B strains and serogroups C and Y were higher in subjects with already-protective hSBA titers. Post-vaccination, while both 4CMenB and MenACWY-CRM elicited robust immunogenicity in students, significant correlations between post-vaccination hSBA titers and carriage of disease-associated serogroups were not observed.Conclusions4CMenB and MenACWY-CRM were both highly immunogenic. There was no correlation between carriage and post-vaccination hSBA titers.     

A phase III randomized, controlled study to assess and compare the immunogenicity and tolerability of single and multi-dose vials of DTwP-Hib, a fully liquid quadravalent vaccine and their comparison with TETRAct-Hib vaccine in Indian infants aged 6-14 weeks

Both WHO and IAP encourage using combination vaccines, wherever feasible. The phase III trial reported here was conducted to assess and compare the immunogenicity, tolerability and safety of two quadravalent vaccines, Quadrovax^® (new vaccine), and TETRAct-Hib^® (available in the market) in a multicentre study, in India. In all, 361 infants aged 6-8 weeks were enrolled, out of which 339 completed the study. The vaccination was done at 6-10-14 weeks following EPI/WHO recommended immunization schedule. Blood samples were collected prior to the administration of first dose and one month after the third dose. Postvaccination, geometric mean titres for each component did not differ significantly between the single dose vial and multi dose vial subgroups and among the two study groups. Adverse events observed were within the range quoted in literature. Quadrovax^® vaccine manufactured by SIIL was found to be safe, immunogenic and non-inferior to the comparator vaccine. The quadravalent vaccine is best recommended in the second year of life when children receive their booster dose at 15-18 months. It can be given to infants during primary immunization series at 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age when Hepatitis B vaccine is given in a separate arm or to infants at 10 weeks who receive the Hepatitis B vaccine separately following the 0, 6 and 14 weeks or 0, 1 and 6 months schedule.     

A phase 3, multicenter,randomized, double-blind study to evaluate the interchangeability of V114, a 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine,and PCV13 with respect to safety,tolerability, and immunogenicity in healthy infants (PNEU-DIRECTION)

BackgroundPneumococcal disease (PD) remains a major health concern globally. In children, pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) provide protection against PD from most vaccine serotypes, but non-vaccine serotypes contribute to residual disease. V114 is a 15-valent PCV containing all 13 serotypes in Prevnar 13? (PCV13) and public health important serotypes 22F and 33F. This phase 3 study evaluated safety and immunogenicity of mixed PCV13/V114 regimens using a 3 + 1 dosing schedule when changing from PCV13 to V114 at doses 2, 3, or 4.Methods900 healthy infants were randomized equally to 5 intervention groups. PCVs were administered in a 3-dose infant series at 2, 4, and 6 months of age followed by a toddler dose at 12–15 months along with concomitant routine vaccines. Safety was evaluated as the proportion of participants with adverse events (AEs). Immunoglobulin G (IgG) responses to the 15 serotypes in V114 were measured at 30 days post-dose 3 and 30 days post-dose 4 (PD4).ResultsFrequencies of injection-site and systemic AEs were generally comparable across all intervention groups. At 30 days PD4 (primary endpoint), IgG geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) for the 13 shared serotypes were generally comparable between mixed V114/PCV13 and 4-dose regimens of PCV13 or V114. In mixed regimens at 30 days PD4, a toddler dose of V114 was sufficient to achieve IgG GMCs comparable to a 4-dose regimen of V114 for serotype 22F, while at least one infant dose was needed in addition to the toddler dose to achieve IgG GMCs comparable to a 4-dose regimen of V114 for serotype 33F.ConclusionsV114 was well tolerated with a generally comparable safety profile to PCV13. For 13 shared serotypes, both mixed regimens and the V114 4-dose regimen induced generally comparable antibody responses to 4-dose regimen with PCV13. Study results support interchangeability of V114 with PCV13 in infants.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03620162; EudraCT: 2018–001151-12.     

A phase 3, randomized,active-controlled study to assess the safety and tolerability of meningococcal serogroup B vaccine bivalent rLP2086 in healthy adolescents and young adults

BackgroundNeisseria meningitidis serogroup B (MnB) is an important cause of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD). A MnB vaccine (bivalent rLP2086, Trumenba^®) consisting of 2 factor H binding protein variants received accelerated approval in the United States for the prevention of IMD caused by MnB in individuals 10–25 years of age. This randomized, active-controlled, observer-blind study further assessed the safety and tolerability of bivalent rLP2086.MethodsEligible subjects ≥10 to <26 years were randomized (2:1) to receive bivalent rLP2086 at months 0, 2, and 6, or hepatitis A virus vaccine (HAV, Havrix^®) at months 0 and 6, and saline at month 2. The primary endpoints were serious adverse events (SAEs) throughout the study and medically-attended adverse events (MAEs) within 30 days after vaccination. Additional safety assessments included SAEs at other study intervals and adverse events (AEs) during the vaccination phase.ResultsOf 5712 subjects randomized, 84.6% (n = 3219) of bivalent rLP2086 recipients and 87.2% (n = 1663) of HAV/saline recipients completed the study. Throughout the study, SAEs were reported for 1.6% and 2.5% of bivalent rLP2086 and HAV/saline recipients, respectively. SAEs related to either vaccine were rare. MAEs occurred in 7.0% and 6.1% of subjects after vaccination 1; 5.5% and 6.1% after vaccination 2; and 5.3% and 5.5% after vaccination 3 in the bivalent rLP2086 and HAV/saline groups, respectively. A greater proportion of subjects reported AEs during the vaccination phase after bivalent rLP2086 compared with HAV/saline recipients; however, when reactogenicity events were excluded, the proportion between groups was similar.ConclusionThis safety study, the largest randomized, active-controlled trial evaluating a recombinant MnB vaccine, demonstrated that bivalent rLP2086 is safe and tolerable in healthy individuals ≥10 to <26 years of age.     

Immunogenicity and safety of a pentavalent acellular pertussis combined vaccine including diphtheria, tetanus, inactivated poliovirus and conjugated Haemophilus Influenzae type b polysaccharide for primary vaccination at 2, 3, 4 or 3, 4, 5 months of age in infants in China

The aim was to demonstrate the immunogenicity and safety of a DTaP-IPV//PRP-T combined vaccine (Pentaxim^®) compared to individual vaccines in infants in the People's Republic of China. Infants (N = 792) were randomly assigned to receive DTaP-IPV//PRP-T at 2, 3 and 4 months of age (Group A) or 3, 4 and 5 months of age (Group B), or DTaP (Wuhan Institute of Biological Products), PRP-T (Act-Hib^®) and IPV (Imovax^® Polio) at 3, 4 and 5 months of age (Group C). Antibody titers were measured pre- and 1 month after the third vaccination; non-inferiority analyses were performed for seroprotection/seroconversion (SP/SC) rates. Safety was assessed 1 month after the primary series. SP/SC rates for the DTaP-IPV//PRP-T vaccine were high and non-inferior to the controls. Reactogenicity was low for each group and no hypotonic hyporesponsive episode or seizure was reported. In conclusion, the DTaP-IPV//PRP-T vaccine was highly immunogenic, non-inferior to the commercially available control vaccines and had a good safety profile for both primary administration schedules.     

Assessment of safety and immunogenicity of two different lots of diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine manufactured using small and large scale manufacturing process

Background

Hib vaccine can be easily incorporated in EPI vaccination schedule as the immunization schedule of Hib is similar to that of DTP vaccine. To meet the global demand of Hib vaccine, SIIL scaled up the Hib conjugate manufacturing process. This study was conducted in Indian infants to assess and compare the immunogenicity and safety of DTwP-HB + Hib (Pentavac^®) vaccine of SIIL manufactured at large scale with the ‘same vaccine’ manufactured at a smaller scale.

Methods

720 infants aged 6-8 weeks were randomized (2:1 ratio) to receive 0.5 ml of Pentavac^® vaccine from two different lots one produced at scaled up process and the other at a small scale process. Serum samples obtained before and at one month after the 3rd dose of vaccine from both the groups were tested for IgG antibody response by ELISA and compared to assess non-inferiority.

Results

Neither immunological interference nor increased reactogenicity was observed in either of the vaccine groups. All infants developed protective antibody titres to diphtheria, tetanus and Hib disease. For hepatitis B antigen, one child from each group remained sero-negative. The response to pertussis was 88% in large scale group vis-à-vis 87% in small scale group. Non-inferiority was concluded for all five components of the vaccine. No serious adverse event was reported in the study.

Conclusions

The scale up vaccine achieved comparable response in terms of the safety and immunogenicity to small scale vaccine and therefore can be easily incorporated in the routine childhood vaccination programme.     

Immunogenicity and safety of concomitant administration of meningococcal serogroup B (4CMenB) and serogroup C (MenC-CRM) vaccines in infants: A phase 3b,randomized controlled trial

BackgroundAfter implementation of routine infant MenC vaccination, MenB remains a serious cause of meningococcal disease, yet to be targeted by vaccination programs in several countries. This study (NCT01339923) investigated the immunogenicity and safety of MenC CRM-conjugated vaccine (MenC-CRM) concomitantly administered with MenB vaccine (4CMenB).MethodsInfants (N = 251) were randomised 1:1 to receive 4CMenB and MenC-CRM (Group 1) or MenC-CRM alone (Group 2) at 3 and 5 months (M3, M5) and a booster at 12 months of age (M12), and pneumococcal vaccine at M3, M5, M7, M12. Antibody responses to meningococcal vaccines were measured at M3, M6, M12, and M13. Non-inferiority of MenC-CRM response in Group 1 vs Group 2 was demonstrated at M6 and M13, if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (LL95%CI) of the difference in percentage of infants with hSBA titres ≥1:8 was >−10%. Sufficiency of MenB response was achieved if LL95%CI of the percentage of infants with hSBA titres ≥1:4 against fHbp, NadA and PorA strains was ≥70% at M6 or ≥75% at M13. Adverse events (AEs) were collected for 7 days post-vaccination, and serious AEs (SAEs) and medically attended AEs throughout the study.ResultsNon-inferiority of MenC response in Group 1 vs Group 2 (LL95%CI −6.4% [M6]; −5.2% [M13]) and sufficiency of MenB response in Group 1 (LL95%CI 92%, 90%, 89% [M6]; 97%, 92%, 93% [M13] against fHbp, NadA, PorA, respectively) were demonstrated. Higher rates of mild to moderate solicited AEs were reported in Group 1. Unsolicited AEs and SAEs incidences were similar across groups.ConclusionsConcomitant administration of MenC-CRM and 4CMenB in infants was immunogenic, resulting in non-inferior responses against MenC compared to MenC-CRM alone and demonstration of sufficient immune response to MenB, after primary and booster vaccination. Reactogenicity was higher for concomitant vaccines administration, but no safety concerns were identified.