Persistent subclinical rejection associated with nodular B-cell infiltrates in a renal transplant recipient

Abstract:  Recently, B-cell infiltrates in acute rejection grafts have attracted interest as an indicator of refractory rejection. Here, we report a case of deceased donor renal transplantation in a Japanese recipient operated overseas in which the recipient suffered from persistent tubulointerstitial rejection episodes associated with B-cell infiltrates. A 59-yr-old man with end-stage renal disease caused by immunoglobulin A nephropathy underwent deceased donor renal transplantation overseas in December 2005. The initial post-operative course was uneventful. The patient was referred to our hospital one month after transplantation. He maintained stable renal function throughout the follow-up period. The maintenance immunosuppressive regimen consisted of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and methylprednisolone. His serum creatinine concentration remained around 1.0 mg/dL, with no evidence of proteinuria. However, a discrepancy was detected between the renal function and the pathological findings. The pathology showed subclinical tubulointerstitial rejection with nodular B-cell infiltrates refractory to aggressive antirejection therapy. A steroid pulse and 15-deoxyspergualin were ineffective and the patient developed interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy by one yr after the transplantation, with persistent tubulitis and B-cell infiltrates. We treated the refractory rejection with B-cell infiltrates with a single 200 mg/body dose of rituximab and obtained an improvement. The pathological findings after administering rituximab consisted of mild tubulitis classified as Banff borderline, and elimination of the nodular B-cell infiltrates. At present, 20 months after renal transplantation, the patient continues to maintain stable renal function, with a good serum creatinine concentration (0.87 mg/dL).     

Late developing C4d-positive humoral renal allograft rejection associated with withdrawal of mycophenolate mofetil

In renal transplantation, C4d-positive acute humoral rejection (AHR) usually develops in the early stage posttransplantation. It is clear C4d can be detected late after the operation, when it is associated with chronic renal allograft rejection. We report a case of a renal allograft recipient who experienced C4d-positive acute renal allograft rejection associated with withdrawal of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) at 10 months after transplantation. This 21-year-old single male patient received his first cadaveric renal allograft under immunosuppression with cyclosporine, MMF, and prednisolone. The serum creatinine recovered to the normal range within 4 days. A protocol biopsy performed at 1 month after transplantation revealed no signs of rejection. The graft function was stable until 10 months postoperation, when MMF was converted to mizoribin. Three days later a biopsy showed a C4d-positive rejection. Patient had no response to the MMF combined with tacrolimus and steroid bolus therapy, which generally improves 85% of AHR among Chinese. He finally returned to dialysis. Our report suggested that C4d positive AHR may occur late after transplantation. MMF is important to suppress the body's humoral response to allograft; when MMF was converted to a weaker immunosuppressant, the dose of the other immunosuppressants (cyclosporine for example) must be adjusted properly.     

A case of allograft dysfunction with antibody-mediated rejection developing 13 yr after kidney transplantation

Abstract:  Antibody-mediated rejection is an important cause of chronic allograft dysfunction. We report a case of chronic antibody-mediated rejection 13 yr after transplantation. This patient is a 19-yr-old man who had renal insufficiency since infancy because of bilateral polycystic kidneys. Peritoneal dialysis was started when he was four yr old and he received a renal allograft from his mother at the age of six yr. Donor and recipient were ABO compatible and immunosuppressive treatment was started with cyclosporine, mizoribine, and methylprednisolone. No acute rejection was experienced and histological acute rejection was not proven on any subsequent protocol biopsies. Ten yr after transplantation, a protocol biopsy revealed moderate chronic allograft nephropathy and severe cyclosporine-associated arteriolopathy. His allograft function was preserved at this time and the cyclosporine dose was tapered to 125 mg/d. His renal function gradually deteriorated starting 12 yr after transplantation. Although mizoribine was changed to mycophenolate mofetil, he required dialysis one yr later. A diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection was made based upon the renal biopsy findings (including C4d staining) and circulating anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody levels (12 yr after transplantation). We conclude that it is necessary to pay attention to antibody-mediated rejection, even in allograft cases with good function for over 10 yr and no risk factors for the development of de novo anti-HLA antibodies.     

A case of accelerated acute rejection after ABO-compatible living unrelated kidney transplantation

Abstract:  A 59-yr-old Japanese woman with chronic renal failure caused by IgA nephropathy and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-related glomerulonephritis underwent kidney transplantation from a living unrelated spousal donor. The blood type was compatible, while the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing showed a 5/6 locus mismatch. She had become pregnant twice by her donor and had never received blood transfusions. Complement-dependent cytotoxicity cross-match, flow cytometry cross-match (FCXM), and flow panel reactive antibody (PRA) were negative. She initially underwent one week of immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) immediately before transplantation to reduce the risk of antibody-mediated rejection. Induction therapy consisted of MMF, tacrolimus (TAC), methylprednisolone (MP), and basiliximab. The allograft function was excellent immediately after the operation. However, the urine output and platelet count declined rapidly on post-operative day (POD) 3, while the serum creatinine (sCr) and lactate dehydrogenase levels rose gradually. Subsequently, we could not detect the diastolic arterial flow on Doppler sonography. We diagnosed accelerated acute rejection and treated her with plasma exchange (PEX), intravenous MP pulse therapy, and rituximab. The first episode biopsy on POD 7 revealed acute vascular rejection and acute antibody-mediated rejection (Banff score AMR II). Her urinary excretion increased beginning on POD 13, while the sCr level decreased gradually and reached 0.9 mg/dL on POD 22. In our retrospective analysis, the LAB screen detected donor-specific antibody (DSA). This case suggested that, for successful kidney transplantation in highly sensitized recipients, such as husband-to-wife spousal kidney transplantation with a history of pregnancy, we should keep the risk of AMR in mind, even if the sensitive antibody detection tests are negative.     

骁悉和环孢素-A预防肾移植术后早期急性排斥反应

目的 探讨骁悉和环孢素－Ａ预防肾移植术后早期急性排斥反应的效果。方法 回顾性分析１９９７年１２月￣１９９９年１月临床资料完整肾移植患者１４６例,随访时间６￣１６个月。根据应用免疫抑制剂方案的不同分为硫唑嘌呤（Ａｚａ）组（环孢素－Ａ、泼尼松龙、Ａｚａ）和骁悉（ＭＭＦ）组（环孢素－Ａ、泼尼松、ＭＭＦ）。其中Ａｚａ组７８例,ＭＭＦ组６８例。所有受者术前行人类白细胞抗原（ＨＬＡ）配型,ＨＬＡ错配≤３个位点     

Successful rescue and maintenance of long-term remission of anti-HLA antibody-mediated acute allograft rejection by rituximab-containing therapy: case report

Abstract:  A 38-yr-old man with chronic renal failure received a second kidney transplantation from a cadaveric donor. Complement-dependent cytotoxicity cross-match (CDC) was negative against T cells, but positive with the B-cell warm test. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-typing showed a one haplo-identical match. The blood type was compatible. He was treated with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), methylpredonisolone (MP), and basiliximab as immunosuppressive therapy. A clinical episode graft biopsy and Flow-PRA on post-operative day (POD) 19 showed anti-HLA antibody-mediated acute rejection (AHR). The patient was treated with plasmapheresis (PP). Renal biopsy performed on POD 65 because of re-rise of serum creatinine level showed worsening of renal injury. The patient was treated with rituximab (100 mg/body) with PP and MP pulse therapy, followed by tacrolimus and MMF. Graft function thereafter improved. A renal allograft biopsy specimen on POD 300 and Flow-PRA showed the remission of AHR within one-yr after transplantation.     

DNA fragmentation in acute and chronic rejection after renal transplantation

Acute and chronic rejections are important denominators for the long-term function of renal grafts. One important indicator of cell damage is enzymatic DNA fragmentation. To investigate possible mechanisms, the rate of DNA fragmentation (TUNEL staining), the expression of tissue transglutaminase II (a marker of advanced DNA damage), and 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OhdG), an indicator of oxidative injury of nucleic acids, were studied by immunohistochemistry. Semithin sections of renal biopsies revealed 23 patients to show acute interstitial rejections (Banff 97 IA, IB); eight patients, acute vascular rejection (Banff 97 IIA, IIB); and 20 patients, chronic allograft nephropathy (Banff 97 I to III). Correlations were calculated between apoptotic cells and serum creatinine at the time of biopsy and after 6 months. In acute rejection, the proximal tubular cells were apoptotic, particularly in regions with mononuclear infiltrates. In consecutive sections, these apoptotic tubular cells also showed damage by reactive oxygen species (positive 8-OhdG staining). Patients with acute interstitial rejection revealed the highest number of tubular DNA fragmentation (14.9 +/- 10.3) versus chronic allograft nephropathy (9.2 +/- 5.6) as TUNEL-positive cells per 80,000 micro m(2) (P < .05). Patients with acute vascular rejection showed a low degree of tubular apoptosis (6.8 +/- 5.1). There was no significant difference in glomerular DNA fragmentation between acute interstitial and chronic rejections: acute interstitial rejection = 7.1 +/- 5.9 versus chronic allograft nephropathy=6.1 +/- 3.9 TUNEL-positive cells per 80,000 micro m(2). There was a significant negative correlation between the degree of tubular (P < .01) and glomerular (P < .05) apoptosis and the serum creatinine at the time of biopsy as well as after 6 months in all patients irrespective of the Banff class. However, there was heterogeneity in the correlation between renal function and the degree of apoptosis in the glomerular and tubular compartments in the various Banff classes. A positive correlation (P < .01) was observed between the degree of tubular apoptosis and serum creatinine at 6 months after biopsy among patients with acute vascular rejection (Banff 97 IIA, IIB). The present data revealed a high degree of tubular DNA fragmentation associated with oxidative stress in acute interstitial rejection. Nevertheless, apoptosis did not generally negatively influence future renal function and may be important to clear proliferating cells. Apoptosis may also play a different pathophysiological role depending on the type of rejection.     

Treatment of early mixed cellular and humoral renal allograft rejection with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil

This prospective study investigated the efficiency of the tacrolimus (Tac) combined with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) alone without immunoadsorption (IA) or plasmapheresis (PPH) as treatment for early (within 2 weeks) acute humoral rejection (AHR) in non-sensitized renal allograft recipients. Of 160 patients enrolled in this prospective study, 11 patients had histologically and clinically confirmed early steroid-resistant acute rejection with an antibody response and received Tac-MMF therapy. No other aggressive rescue methods such as IA, PPH were used, according to the study design. Patients (n=11) were followed for 13.8+/-3.5 months; nine were females. The complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch was negative before transplantation in all patients and only positive for panel-reactive antibody in one patient. Most of the rejection episodes were mixed with cellular rejection (four patients met Banff IIA criteria, five patients met Banff IIB, one patient met Banff IB, and one patient met Banff borderline). After 16.19+/-6.16 days of treatment, all rejection episodes were successfully reversed and all graft functions were stable, with a mean serum creatinine level of 1.12+/-0.32 mg/dl during follow-up. No patient suffered from severe infectious complications (except one case of urinary infection). Our investigation suggests that Tac combined with MMF alone is adequate to reverse early mixed cellular and humoral C4d-positive rejection in non-sensitized renal allograft recipients.     

A case of acute humoral rejection with various depositions of C4d, IgG, IgM, and C3c in peritubular capillaries and/or glomerular capillaries

Abstract:  A 41-year-old Japanese male patient with end-stage renal disease received ABO compatible living related kidney transplantation from his sister on April 2003. The kidney functioned immediately after kidney transplantation. Protocol allograft biopsy at 1 yr after kidney transplantation was performed on April 2004. His serological data was not particular and he did not suffer with chronic inflammation. The allograft biopsy specimen revealed moderate accumulations of polymorphonuclear leukocytes in peritubular capillaries (PTCs), dilatation of PTCs and moderate infiltrations of polymorphonuclear and/or mononuclear cell in glomeruli (Transplant glomerulitis, moderate). Immunofluorescent study (IF) of a frozen section of the allograft biopsy specimen showed a strong, diffusely distributed endothelial-staining pattern in PTCs for C4d. The C4d was also strongly detected in a linear glomerular basement membrane (GBM) pattern. And widespread moderate C3c deposits, weak IgM, and IgG deposits were also seen in PTCs. Immunofluorescent study also showed granularly peripheral and mesangial deposits of strong IgM, C1q, and moderate IgG in glomeruli, IgA and C3c were faintly positive. The panel reactive antibody, which had been negative before transplantation, was positive for both HLA classes I and II at that time. We diagnosed as acute humoral rejection (AHR) and he was treated with course of steroid pulses and 5 d of gusperimus (DSG); and a total of three times Plasma exchange (PE) treatment was added. The level of serum creatinine, once increased to 1.7 mg/dL, decreased gradually to 1.4 mg/dL. He has a stable graft function. This is the only case of various depositions of immunoglobulins and complements in PTC and/or glomerular capillaries during AHR.     

Safe conversion of mycophenolate mofetil to azathioprine in kidney transplant recipients with sirolimus-based immunosuppression

Aim:   Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a powerful immunosuppressive drug with established efficacy and safety. The long-term use of MMF may bring increased risk of for infection and malignancy and also increased cost of transplantation. The search for minimization of immunosuppressive protocol has led to an open randomized clinical trial of conversion from MMF to azathioprine (AZA).
Methods:   A total of 50 kidney allograft recipients treated with prednisone, sirolimus and MMF were randomized into two groups: converted (AZA group) and continuing (MMF group). The average duration of MMF therapy prior to conversion was 43 months in each group. Inclusion criteria included: patients with serum creatinine levels of less than 200 µmol/L; no past history of acute vascular rejection or recent acute rejection 6 months before randomization; and normal liver function tests.
Results:   Baseline demographics were similar in the two groups. During the 12 month observation period, there were no acute rejection episodes in either group. There were no significant differences in overall patient or graft survival or function. AZA-treated patients had a lower incidence of gastrointestinal complications ( P  = 0.03). Daily cost reduction in the AZA group was more than $US8.79/day per patient.
Conclusion:   In general, replacing MMF with AZA in stable renal transplant recipients is well tolerated and was cost effective with no increased risk of rejection. As the this study was on relatively small samples, larger and longer follow-up studies will be needed to confirm these expected advantages for the long-term outcome and to assess the long-term safety of this minimization of immunosuppressive therapy.     

Combination therapy of mycophenolate mofetil and rapamycin in prevention of chronic renal allograft rejection in the rat

BACKGROUND: Chronic rejection is the leading cause of long-term allograft loss. Until now, no therapy has been recognized as being efficient in its prevention. In addition to their immunosuppressive activity, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and rapamycin (RAPA) show diverse properties against vascular smooth muscle cell activity, cell-adhesion molecule expression, and ischemia-reperfusion injury. The combination effect of MMF and RAPA was tested to prevent chronic renal allograft rejection in the rat in this study. METHODS: Nephrectomized Lewis recipients underwent orthotopic transplantation with Fisher (F344) kidneys (allograft groups) or Lewis kidneys (isograft control). The initial episode of acute rejection was controlled with a short course of cyclosporine A (CsA) (1.5 mg/kg/day for 10 days). From weeks 4 to 20, animals were thereafter treated every other day either with vehicle, MMF (20 mg/kg), RAPA (0.8 mg/kg), or MMF (20 mg/kg) plus RAPA (0.8 mg/kg) in combination. Animals were sequentially killed at serial intervals over a follow-up of 50 weeks, and histologic study was performed on harvested kidneys according to the Banff working classification for allograft pathology. RESULTS: Animals treated with MMF or RAPA alone showed a Banff sum score similar to the allograft control group (6.31+/-1.01 and 7.27+/-1.14 vs. 7.21+/-1.14, respectively; P>0.05). When the recipient rats were treated with MMF and RAPA in combination, it resulted in a clinically and statistically significant reduction of Banff sum score (4.21+/-0.79, P<0.01), with specific inhibition of vascular fibrous intimal thickening, allograft glomerulopathy, and interstitial fibrosis. CONCLUSION: Over a 50-week study, concomitant therapy of MMF and RAPA prevents chronic renal allograft rejection, probably through reduction of ischemic and cytotoxic degenerative changes. These results warrant further investigation in the combination of MMF and RAPA as anti-chronic rejection therapy in clinical transplantation.     

Clinicopathological evaluation of renal allograft treated with anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody

Abstract:  Twenty-seven living-donor kidney recipients were treated with the antibody against CD25 as the induction immunosuppressive agent. They did not develop acute rejection within 1 month after transplantation, and mean serum creatinine level at 1 month was 1.0 ± 0.4 mg/dL. There were no findings of acute rejection or drug-induced nephrotoxity in protocol biopsies at 1 month following transplantation. After 1 month had passed, acute rejection occurred in three cases. The pathological grade of acute rejection varied from borderline to grade III by Banff classification. The careful inspection is necessary to find out the occurrences of acute rejection more than 2 months after transplantation because immunological situation has been changing around this period.     

Impact of the Banff '97 classification for histological diagnosis of rejection on clinical outcome and renal function parameters after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: Data on a systematic correlation of specific pathomorphologic lesions in renal allograft biopsy specimens with clinical outcome parameters are crucial to determine the relevance of kidney biopsy findings after transplantation for graft prognosis. Specific histologic lesions of the revised Banff '97 classification were correlated with clinical follow-up data. METHODS: The analysis was done on a series of 48 consecutive renal allograft biopsy specimens. Logistic regression was used to compare for response to rejection treatment dependent on histologic grading. Cox regression was applied to analyze the impact of the histologic findings on graft failure during ongoing follow-up. RESULTS: Severity of acute rejection was statistically associated with unresponsiveness to antirejection treatment (odds ratio 2.39, 95% confidence interval 1.13-5.03) and predicted an increased risk of graft failure (hazard ratio 2.16, 95% confidence interval 1.48-3.14). Intimal arteritis (hazard ratio 1.85, 95% confidence interval 1.40-2.45) was the only determinate of a poor survival prognosis. Mean serum creatinine level and the need for antihypertensive drugs were significantly higher in the Banff I-III graded groups after 1 and 2 years of follow-up, whereas patients with borderline rejection were not significantly different from the control group. CONCLUSION: We confirmed a significant association between the revised Banff '97 classification and graft outcome. Intimal arteritis was the only significant predictor of a poor survival probability. The distinction of borderline rejection and Banff grade I rejection seems to be important from a prognostic point of view.     

Comparison of transplanted kidney function in patients on two different doses of mycophenolate mofetil

INTRODUCTION: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), an immunosuppressant that is widely used in renal transplant recipients, is associated with several dose-dependent hematologic and gastrointestinal side effects that lead to drug dose reduction or even discontinuation. The aim of this study was to compare the renal function and acute rejection rates of kidney allograft recipients who were on two different mycophenolate mofetil doses. METHODS: In a prospective study, 59 allograft kidney recipients who were on MMF 2 g/d were randomly selected and followed for evidences of acute rejection or drug side effects. Four patients were excluded from the study due to noncompliance, graft loss, and patient loss from opportunistic infection. Of the remaining 55 patients, 22 patients (40%) underwent MMF dose reduction to 1.35 +/- 0.23 g/d due to perceived side effects or economic reasons (group 1). The mean time for this change was 4.2 +/- 2.1 months after the kidney transplantation. The remaining patients (group 2, n = 33, 60%) had no change in MMF 2 g/d drug dosage. All patients were followed for at least 30 months after transplantation. Renal function tests (blood urea and serum creatinine) were measured monthly. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 11.0 (Student t test). A P value < .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable regarding age, gender, other immunosuppressive medications, and the time after transplantation. There were no episodes of acute rejection in group 1 after MMF dose reduction. The renal function (blood urea or serum creatinine levels) was comparable between the two groups at the end of study (P = .846 and .610, respectively). CONCLUSION: MMF dose reduction was not associated with an increased risk of acute renal allograft rejection or impaired graft function.     

Minimization of immunosuppressive therapy and immunological monitoring of kidney transplant recipients with long-term allograft survival

Incidence of cardiovascular complications, cancers and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) suggests reduction of immunosuppressive dosages. Some studies analyzed the effects of minimization of immunosuppression until the avoidance of immunosuppressive drugs. However minimization seems to be related to a higher incidence of acute rejection. Induction of tolerance after transplantation and use of immunological tests that could monitor the immune reactivity are required. The aim of this study is to evaluate immunological state in a group of recipients after deceased and living donor kidney transplantation and to minimize immunosuppressive therapy monitoring simultaneously clinical and immunological parameters. We analyzed 41 patients, 38 from deceased donors and 3 from living donor kidney transplantation. All patients were treated with triple immunosuppressive therapy: cyclosporine or sirolimus or tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids. In all recipients the presence of CD8+CD28- T suppressor cells (Ts) was analyzed. Patients were divided in 2 groups, according to the presence of Ts. In patients with Ts, (Group A, n=19), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was progressively reduced and then stopped. Steroids were subsequently reduced and then interrupted, maintaining an immunosuppressive therapy with low doses of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) or sirolimus (SIR). 22 patients were without presence of Ts: we enrolled for the study only patient acute rejection free, without proteinuria and with creatinine levels stable (Group B, n=19). In these patients, MMF was reduced and then stopped, while steroids were decreased to 5 mg at alternate days, maintaining CNI or SIR at medium therapeutic dosages (minimized therapy). Patient and graft overall survival in Group A and in Group B were respectively at 100% and 94.7%. Incidence of acute rejection was respectively at 0% in group A and 15.7% in Group B. Presence of episodes of acute rejection in Group B confirms risk of later minimization of steroids and the relevance of the analysis of recipient immunological reactivity before modification of immunosuppressive therapy. A careful evaluation of recipient immune reactivity with the presence of T regulatory cells can allow adequate and personalized immunosuppressive regimens, without high risks of acute rejection.     

Elective withdrawal of mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients treated with mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, and prednisone

In a retrospective study we investigated the risk of acute rejection after the withdrawal of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in 39 adult patients treated with cyclosporine (CyA), prednisone, and MMF for at least 6 months following renal transplantation. After reaching a stable renal graft function, MMF was withdrawn and CyA and prednisone were continued. Preceding the withdrawal of MMF, four patients experienced an acute rejection. During a median follow-up of 38 months after discontinuing MMF, no acute rejection occurred. The mean serum creatinine level did not change during the first 6 months after withdrawal of MMF. We conclude that elective withdrawal of MMF in stable renal transplant recipients at 6 months after transplantation bears no important risk of an occurrence of acute rejection. Received: 24 November 1999 Revised: 11 May 2000 Accepted: 18 December 2000     

The effect of different immunosuppressive regimens on TGF-β1 expression in kidney transplant patients

Transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1 is a key profibrogenic cytokine associated with the pathogenesis of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). The primary aim of this study was to evaluate TGF-beta1 expression in protocol kidney graft biopsy in patients treated with different immunosuppressive regimens. Protocol kidney graft biopsies were carried out in 77 patients with stable graft function at 1 year after kidney transplantation, treated with a triple-drug regimen based on cyclosporin A (CyA; n = 49) or tacrolimus (TAC; n = 28). Morphological findings were assessed using the Banff 97 classification. TGF-beta1 expression was analysed using immunochemistry, and semiquantitatively scored in different renal structures (total score 0-18). Clinical data were analysed at the time of biopsy, and 12 months thereafter. No significant relation was found between the used immunosuppressive regimen and the histomorphological picture in the graft. TGF-beta1 expression within graft tissue was significantly higher in patients treated with CyA when compared with TAC (9.94 +/- 4.2 vs. 5.0 +/- 3.2; P < 0.001). Serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate (GFR; Cockroft-Gault calculation) were comparable in both groups but, in the course of the next 12 months, GFR significantly decreased only in the CyA-treated group (from 1.03 +/- 0.33 to 0.96 +/- 0.37 ml/s) while not changing in the TAC-treated group. Patients treated with TAC had significantly lower diastolic blood pressure and serum cholesterol. The significantly lower TGF-beta1 expression in 1-year protocol kidney graft biopsy in TAC-treated patients with stable renal function, and the different development of graft function in both groups suggest a possible benefit of TAC for long-term graft acceptance.     

Successful third kidney transplantation with intensive immunosuppression in a highly sensitized recipient

HLA sensitization associated with previous kidney transplantation is a major drawback to retransplantation. Recently we successfully performed a third graft using intensive immunosuppression for a highly sensitized recipient. The patient was a 31-year-old man who had previously undergone a living donor graft from his father at our institute in 1999. His kidney graft function had deteriorated due to chronic allograft nephropathy, returning to hemodialysis therapy in 2005. He received a second graft from a deceased donor in another country on August 14, 2006. It rejected on postoperative day 3 possibly due to acute accelerated rejection. He was offered a third kidney from his brother. Panel-reactive antibody (PRA) tested before the third procedure revealed positive class I (88%) and class II (96%) PRAs. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was started 3 weeks before the third transplantation, and preoperative plasmapheresis performed thrice. He underwent the living donor graft on March 9, 2007. Immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus, MMF, methylprednisolone, and basiliximab. Immediately afterward there was a sudden decrease in allograft blood flow and urine output, implying hyperacute rejection. Following treatment with plasmapheresis and a single dose of rituximab (200 mg), the kidney allograft function recovered, although the PRA at 3 weeks was still positive. Six months posttransplantation, he is well with a creatinine of 0.9 mg/dL. Our protocol may reduce the risk for graft loss in a highly sensitized transplant recipient.     

Sirolimus: A Switch Option for Mycophenolate Mofetil–Induced Leukopenia in Renal Transplant Recipients

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a potent immunosuppressive agent used to prevent acute and chronic rejection in kidney transplantation or for rescue therapy. One side effect of MMF is bone marrow toxicity, including leukopenia, which may necessitate drug withdrawal. We report 2 patients who underwent kidney transplantation and developed leukopenia while receiving MMF and safely switched to sirolimus. A 35-year-old woman underwent deceased donor kidney transplantation. She received basiliximab, tacrolimus, MMF, and a corticosteroid. On postoperative day (POD) 75, her white blood cell (WBC) count was 1800/μL. A 44-year-old women underwent deceased donor kidney transplantation and received basiliximab, tacrolimus, MMF, valganciclovir, and a corticosteroid. On POD 88, her WBC count was 1320/μL. MMF was switched to sirolimus, resulting in recovery of WBC count without rejection. Switch from MMF to sirolimus is safe and favorable in MMF-induced leukopenia in renal transplant recipient.     

Sirolimus rescue therapy for refractory rejection in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Acute renal allograft rejection episodes refractory to antilymphocyte preparations almost inevitably progress to transplantation loss. To reverse ongoing rejection processes, we administered sirolimus (RAPA) after failure of conventional immunosuppressive regimens including full courses of antilymphocyte sera. METHODS: All 36 renal transplantation recipients reported herein displayed either Grade IIB or Grade III biopsy-proven (Banff 1993 criteria) ongoing rejection episodes despite prior treatment with pulse and/or oral recycling of steroids and at least one 14- to 21-day course of murine (OKT3) or equine (ATGAM) antilymphocyte treatment. We compared the actual 12-month outcomes of two demographically similar cohorts of patients treated for refractory rejection with RAPA (Group I; n=24) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; Group II; n=12) added to a baseline regimen of cyclosporine (CsA)/prednisone (Pred). RESULTS: Rescue therapy reversed the renal dysfunction in 96% of patients in the RAPA group versus 67% in the MMF group (P=0.03) despite the fact that a greater fraction of patients in the RAPA (17 of 24) than the MMF group (6 of 12) had experienced two or more episodes of acute rejection before study entry and the fact that the recurrent bouts of acute rejection occurred within the first 6 months posttransplant in 94% of patients in the RAPA group compared with 50% (P=0.005) in the MMF group. Among the patients who were reversed successfully, the rates of rebound acute rejection were similar (4% vs. 8%). The mean serum creatinine values were slightly, although not significantly, lower among RAPA than MMF patients at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months: namely, 2.6 vs. 2.8, 2.8 vs. 3.2, 3.0 vs. 3.3, and 2.8 vs. 3.2 mg/dL, respectively. The 1-year patient and graft survival rates were similar: namely, 88% vs. 92% and 83% vs. 67% for the RAPA versus MMF groups. CONCLUSION: RAPA is a potent immunosuppressive agent for the treatment of refractory renal allograft rejection.