Coronary artery disease is associated with valvular heart disease,but could it Be a predictive factor?

ObjectiveThis study was conducted to evaluate the prevalence of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe valvular heart disease (VHD) and the association between these two cardiac entities. Our research aims to introduce the theory of a possible causal relationship.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted on 1308 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for severe VHD in the cardiovascular department of Notre-Dame de Secours University Hospital (NDSUH) between December 2000 and December 2016. According to transthoracic echocardiography, patients were divided into 4 groups: patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), patients with severe aortic regurgitation (AR), patients with severe mitral stenosis (MS), and patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR). Preoperative coronary angiographies were reviewed for the presence or the absence of significant CAD (≥50% luminal stenosis). Chi-square test and 2 × 2 tables were used.ResultsOf the 1308 patients with severe VHD, 1002 patients had isolated aortic valve disease, 240 patients had isolated mitral valve disease, and 66 patients had combined aortomitral valve disease. CAD was detected in 27.75% of all patients with severe VHD, in 32% of patients with isolated aortic valve disease, and in 15% of patients with isolated mitral valve disease. Statistical analysis showed a higher prevalence in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis and a significant relationship between CAD and aortic valve disease, mainly severe AS (p < 0.0001).ConclusionThe prevalence of CAD in patients with VHD is 27.75%, and it correlates significantly with aortic valve disease, in particular with severe AS. Future large studies are needed to evaluate the possible causal relationship.     

Aortic stenosis,angina pectoris,coronary artery disease

The data from 88 patients (pts) with aortic stenosis (AS) were reviewed to determine relationships between angina pectoris (AP) and coronary artery disease (CAD). Results of surgery performed in 81 of these pts was analyzed. All pts had coronary arterlograms, and lesions ≥ 50% were considered significant. Fifty-nine pts had an aortic valve gradient measured at catheterization ≥ 40 mmHg, and in 29 pts, AS was confirmed at operation. Sixty-eight pts (77%) experienced AP, and 32 had coexisting CAD (47%); 9 of 20 pts without AP had CAD (45%). There were no significant differences in the incidence of AP in pts divided into subgroups by the aortic valve gradient (40–50, 51–100, 101–200 mmHg) or age (40–59, 60–81 years. Also, no significant differences were found in the incidence or extent of CAD between the two age groups; the extent of CAD was similar regardless of the presence or absence of AP. In pts with AP (1) CAD was more likely in pts ≥ 60 years of age; (2) CAD was less likely when the aortic valve gradient was > 100 mmHg, suggesting that AP in these pts was due to hemodynamically severe AS. All pts with 3-vessel CAD experienced AP, and the aortic valve gradient was less in these pts than in those with no CAD or less extensive CAD. In 19 pts with combined AS and CAD who had both the aortic valve replaced and a revascularization operation only 1 of pts died in the hospital, while 3 of 19 pts with combined AS and CAD who had aortic valve replacement alone died. In this study a significant number of pts with AS experienced AP, and the presence or absence of AP did not predict coexisting CAD. Coronary arteriography is recommended in the evaluation of pts ≥ 40 years of age with AS. The operative mortality appears to be decreased in pts with AS and CAD who have combined surgery.     

Left predominant coronary circulation in patients with valvular aortic stenoses

This study was conducted to examine whether a correlation exists between the incidence of aortic stenosis and predominant left coronary perfusion. Therefore, coronary angiograms of 77 patients with mitral stenosis (Group 1), 50 patients with combined mitral valve disease and pure mitral insufficiency (Group 2), 61 patients with aortic insufficiency with or without mitral valve disease (Group 3), 49 patients with pure aortic stenosis (Group 4), and 69 patients with combined aortic valve disease and aortic stenosis with concomitant mitral valve disease (Group 5) were reviewed. Group 6 consisted of 20 patients with coronary heart disease. A statistically significant accumulation of left coronary circulation was found in patients with pure aortic stenosis (Group 4) (33%) as well as in patients with combined aortic valve disease (19%). The frequency of predominant left coronary circulation was comparable in all other patients (Group 1: 8%; Group 2: 10%; Group 3: 8%; Group 6: 7.5%). Thus, the presence of left predominance in a diagnostic coronary arteriogram performed in a patient with aortic stenosis could be a clue that the aortic stenosis is congenital.     

Indications for coronary angiography in patients with acquired heart valve diseases with reference to risk factors

The aims of the study were to examine the frequency of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with acquired valvular heart disease and to investigate the parameters by which significant coronary artery stenosis can be identified without invasive measures in these patients. For this reason 266 consecutive patients with acquired valvular heart disease (aortic, mitral or combined lesions) were examined retrospectively. In 24 patients (9%) a significant (50% or more reduction of the diameter) coronary artery stenosis was found. The prevalence of CAD increased with age: only one patient younger than 50 years, but 23 patients (13%) older than 50 years revealed significant CAD (19% men, 7% women). Increased levels of cholesterol and/or triglycerides were found more frequently in patients with CAD (33% and 29%, respectively) than in those without (6% and 12%, respectively). No differences were found in patients with aortic and mitral valve disease. Patients with typical chest pain revealed CAD in 30% of cases, whereas only 5% of the patients without angina pectoris (or 4% with atypical chest pain) showed a significant coronary artery stenosis. A high percentage (62%) of patients with typical chest pain and mitral valve disease revealed CAD. None of the 77 female patients without typical angina pectoris had significant coronary artery stenosis, whereas 11% of the male patients showed significant CAD even without typical symptoms. In 51 patients without typical angina pectoris and with no risk factors, no CAD was observed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Relation of angina to coronary artery disease in mitral and in aortic valve disease

Of 129 patients with either mitral or aortic valve disease angina was present in 55 (42%). It was more frequent in aortic (60%) than in mitral valve disease (33%). The standard 12-lead electrocardiogram was not helpful in distinguishing underlying occlusive coronary artery disease. Coronary arteriography demonstrated coronary artery disease in 26 patients (20%), only 2 of whom had no angina. The incidence of coronary artery disease was almost identical in both the mitral and aortic groups (22% and 17%, respectively), but the percentage of those with demonstrable coronary artery disease accompanying angina was much higher in the mitral group (67% as against 29%). Angina in mitral valve disorders is thus much more likely to be the result of disease of the coronary arteries. Coronary arteriography is mandatory in all patients in both groups who have angina. Otherwise it seems unnecessary as coronary artery disease was found in only 2 patients who did not have angina.     

Prevalence and significance of reversible radionuclide ischemic perfusion defects in symptomatic aortic valve disease patients with or without concomitant coronary disease

To determine the prevalence and significance of exercise-induced localized perfusion defects in symptomatic patients with aortic valve disease, thallium-201 rest and exercise studies were performed in a consecutive series of 29 such patients prior to left heart catheterization with coronary arteriography. Eight patients had repeat studies after aortic valve replacement. Twelve of 17 patients with predominant aortic regurgitation (AR) had distinct LV apical defects during exercise despite normal coronary arteries, while 10 of 12 patients with aortic valve disease and associated coronary artery disease (CAD) had localized perfusion defects in LV areas other than the apex. In patients with AR, reversible apical perfusion defects can occur without CAD; these apical detects are probably a reflection of severe LV volume overload in AR. LV perfusion defects in areas other than the apex are specific for CAD in aortic valve disease, and concomitant CAD may not provoke regional LV perfusion deficits in aortic stenosis patients with severe LV hypertrophy.     

Relation of angina to coronary artery disease in mitral and in aortic valve disease.

Of 129 patients with either mitral or aortic valve disease angina was present in 55 (42%). It was more frequent in aortic (60%) than in mitral valve disease (33%). The standard 12-lead electrocardiogram was not helpful in distinguishing underlying occlusive coronary artery disease. Coronary arteriography demonstrated coronary artery disease in 26 patients (20%), only 2 of whom had no angina. The incidence of coronary artery disease was almost identical in both the mitral and aortic groups (22% and 17%, respectively), but the percentage of those with demonstrable coronary artery disease accompanying angina was much higher in the mitral group (67% as against 29%). Angina in mitral valve disorders is thus much more likely to be the result of disease of the coronary arteries. Coronary arteriography is mandatory in all patients in both groups who have angina. Otherwise it seems unnecessary as coronary artery disease was found in only 2 patients who did not have angina.     

Should a Regurgitant Mitral Valve Be Replaced Simultaneously with a Stenotic Aortic Valve?

Mitral valve regurgitation frequently accompanies aortic valve stenosis. It has been suggested that mitral regurgitation improves after aortic valve replacement alone and that the mitral valve need not be replaced simultaneously Furthermore, mitral regurgitation associated with coronary artery disease, particularly in patients with poor left ventricular function, shows immediate improvement after coronary artery bypass grafting. We studied 60 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis and mitral regurgitation to determine the degree of improvement in mitral regurgitation after aortic valve replacement alone versus aortic valve replacement combined with coronary artery bypass grafting. Thirty-six of the patients had normal coronary arteries (Group 1); the other 24 had symptomatic coronary artery disease requiring bypass surgery (Group 2). Echocardiography was performed preoperatively, 1 week postoperatively, and at follow-up. In Group 1, left ventricular ejection fraction did not improve early or at 2.5 months postoperatively, but mitral regurgitation improved gradually during follow-up. In Group 2, mitral regurgitation showed improvement 1 week postoperatively (p < 0.001), and left ventricular ejection fraction was improved at 2.5 months. We conclude that patients with aortic valve stenosis and mild-to-severe mitral regurgitation, without echocardiographic signs of chordal or papillary muscle rupture and without coronary artery disease, should undergo aortic valve replacement alone. The mitral regurgitation will remain the same or improve. For patients with coexisting coronary artery disease, simultaneous aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting are imperative; however, the mitral valve again requires no intervention, since mitral regurgitation improves significantly after the other 2 procedures.     

Significance of angina pectoris in aortic valve stenosis.

Of 60 patients aged 45 to 66 years with aortic valve stenosis, 28 (47 per cent) had angina pectoris. Significant coronary arterial obstruction was shown by selective coronary cineangiography in 14 of them. Systolic pressure gradients across the aortic valve were lower in patients with angina than in those without. In those with angina, systolic gradients were higher in those with normal coronary arteriograms than in those with demonstrable coronary arterial disease. Aortic valve replacement relieved the angina in all patients who had normal coronary arteriograms. When valve replacement was combined with coronary bypass grafting in those with coronary arterial disease, surgical mortality was higher and symptomatic relief less predictable. Incapacitating angina in patients with aortic stenosis was nearly always associated with significant coronary disease. In those with less severe angina it was impossible to predict the state of the coronary arteries. Two patients, who did not have angina and who did not undergo coronary arteriography, died after aortic valve replacement and were found at necropsy to have unsuspected severe coronary disease. We, therefore, suggest that coronary arteriography should be carried out in all patients over the age of 40 years in whom surgery is being considered for aortic stenosis.     

Thromboembolic Complications of Mitral Valve Disease

Summary: Five hundred and eighty-eight patients with mitral valve disease were studied.
The incidence of systemic emboli was found to be higher in patients with pure mitral stenosis (16-6%) and mixed mitral stenosis and incompetence (19-4%) than in patients with mitral incompetence (3-1%).
The patients with mitral stenosis who had episodes of systemic emboli tended to be older than 40 years, with moderate or severe valve lesions, atrial fibrillation and moderate or gross enlargement of the left atrial appendage or left atrium.
The following factors were found to be unrelated to systemic embolism – associated aortic valve disease, sex, smoking habit, history of rheumatism, parity, haemoglobin, blood urea, pulmonary hypertension, duration of antifailure treatment, presence of heart failure, and cardiothoracic ratio.     

Significance of angina pectoris in aortic valve stenosis.

Of 60 patients aged 45 to 66 years with aortic valve stenosis, 28 (47 per cent) had angina pectoris. Significant coronary arterial obstruction was shown by selective coronary cineangiography in 14 of them. Systolic pressure gradients across the aortic valve were lower in patients with angina than in those without. In those with angina, systolic gradients were higher in those with normal coronary arteriograms than in those with demonstrable coronary arterial disease. Aortic valve replacement relieved the angina in all patients who had normal coronary arteriograms. When valve replacement was combined with coronary bypass grafting in those with coronary arterial disease, surgical mortality was higher and symptomatic relief less predictable. Incapacitating angina in patients with aortic stenosis was nearly always associated with significant coronary disease. In those with less severe angina it was impossible to predict the state of the coronary arteries. Two patients, who did not have angina and who did not undergo coronary arteriography, died after aortic valve replacement and were found at necropsy to have unsuspected severe coronary disease. We, therefore, suggest that coronary arteriography should be carried out in all patients over the age of 40 years in whom surgery is being considered for aortic stenosis.     

Coronary angiography in the preoperative exploration of non-ischemic acquired valve diseases]

One hundred and fifty-nine patients with aortic valve disease (86 cases), mitral valve disease (58 cases) or mitral and aortic disease (15 cases) underwent a pre-operative haemodynamic study, including coronary arteriography either as a routine (age greater than 50 years) or because of chest pains. Coronary arteriography is easy to do during left heart catheterisation and nowadays carries minimal risk. In the cases of chest pains, it showed stenotic lesions of the coronary vessels in 22% of patients with aortic valve disease and in 35% of those with mitral disease. In the absence of angina, coronary arteriography showed no evidence of coronary artery disease in the cases of mitral regurgitation and of aortic valve disease. In contrast, it showed stenotic lesions in three cases of mitral stenosis. In the whole of the series, coronary artery disease proved a contra-indication to surgery in three cases, and was an indication for aorta-coronary by-pass grafting, in addition to valve surgery, in seven other cases. In the absence of angina, coronary arteriography has only a slight influence on the decision to operate. It does however give additional security, which justifies its routine use in patients over 50 years of age, particularly those with mitral valve disease.     

Thromboembolic Complications of Mitral Valve Disease

Summary: Five hundred and eighty-eight patients with mitral valve disease were studied. The incidence of systemic emboli was found to be higher in patients with pure mitral stenosis (16-6%) and mixed mitral stenosis and incompetence (19-4%) than in patients with mitral incompetence (3-1%). The patients with mitral stenosis who had episodes of systemic emboli tended to be older than 40 years, with moderate or severe valve lesions, atrial fibrillation and moderate or gross enlargement of the left atrial appendage or left atrium. The following factors were found to be unrelated to systemic embolism–associated aortic valve disease, sex, smoking habit, history of rheumatism, parity, haemoglobin, blood urea, pulmonary hypertension, duration of antifailure treatment, presence of heart failure, and cardiothoracic ratio.     

Prevalence of coronary artery disease in patients with isolated aortic valve stenosis.

The prevalence of significant coronary artery disease (reduction in luminal diameter by more than 50%) among 88 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis requiring aortic valve replacement at Hammersmith Hospital was examined. Twenty two (34%) patients had significant coronary disease. Nineteen of 42 (45%) patients with typical angina had coronary disease; three of 20 (15%) patients with atypical chest pain had coronary disease, while none of 26 patients free of chest pain had significant coronary disease. Risk factors for coronary disease were equally distributed among patients with and without significant luminal obstruction. Because of the small, but definite, hazard of coronary arteriography and in the interest of cost containment it is suggested that patients with aortic stenosis who are free of chest pain do not require routine coronary arteriography. This applies particularly to patients requiring urgent aortic valve replacement.     

Prevalence of significant coronary heart disease in valvular heart disease in Indian patients

Records of 326 patients were analysed to determine the prevalence of coronary heart disease (CHD) in patients with valvular heart disease (VHD) and to identify the group in whom coronary arteriography is essential. Significant CHD (60% or more luminal narrowing) was found in 7 per cent of cases, and its prevalence was 3 per cent in mitral, 10 per cent in aortic, and 6 per cent in combined mitral and aortic valve disease. Angina was present in 14 per cent of patients with mitral, 39 per cent with aortic, and 21 per cent with combined mitral and aortic valve disease. Seventy-three per cent of patients with CHD had angina whereas only 19 per cent with angina had CHD. The prevalence of CHD was higher in patients above 50 years (13%) and in males (98%) as compared to those below 50 years (3%) and females (none). We conclude that the prevalence of CHD is low in our patients with VHD. Routine coronary arteriography is recommended only in males over the age of 50 years.     

Morphologic features of the normal and abnormal mitral valve

Anatomic and functional features of the normal and abnormal mitral valve are reviewed. Of 1,010 personally studied necropsy patients with severe (functional class III or IV, New York Heart Association) cardiac dysfunction from primary valvular heart disease, 434 (43%) had mitral stenosis (MS) with or without mitral regurgitation (MR): unassociated with aortic valve stenosis or regurgitation or with tricuspid valve stenosis in 189 (44%) patients, and associated with aortic stenosis in 152 (35%), with pure (no element of stenosis) aortic regurgitation in 65 (15%) patients, and with tricuspid valve stenosis with or without aortic valve stenosis in 28 (6%) patients. The origin of MS was rheumatic in all 434 patients. Of the 1,010 necropsy patients, 165 (16%) had pure MR (papillary muscle dysfunction excluded): unassociated with aortic valve stenosis or regurgitation or with tricuspid valve stenosis in 97 (59%) patients, and associated with pure aortic regurgitation in 45 (27%) and with aortic valve stenosis in 23 (14%) patients. When associated with dysfunction of the aortic valve, pure MR was usually rheumatic in origin, but when unassociated with aortic valve dysfunction it was usually nonrheumatic in origin. Review of operatively excised mitral valves in patients with pure MR unassociated with aortic valve dysfunction disclosed mitral valve prolapse (most likely an inherent congenital defect) as the most common cause of MR. Excluding the patients with MR from coronary heart disease (papillary muscle dysfunction), mitral prolapse was the cause of MR in 60 (88%) of the other 68 patients, and a rheumatic origin was responsible in only 3 of the 68 patients, all 68 of whom were greater than 30 years of age. Mitral anular calcification in persons aged greater than 65 years is usually associated with calcific deposits in the aortic valve cusps and in the coronary arteries. Because calcium in each of these 3 sites is common in older individuals residing in the Western World, it is most reasonable to view mitral anular calcification in older individuals as a manifestation of atherosclerosis. Mitral anular calcium appears to be extremely uncommon in persons with total serum cholesterol levels less than 150 mg/dl. Mitral anular calcium may produce mild MR and, if the deposits are heavy enough, MS.     

Aortic stenosis, angina pectoris, and coronary artery disease.

The relationships between aortic stenosis, coronary artery disease, angina pectoris, and myocardial infarction were examined in 173 patients with isolated calcific aortic stenosis who had coronary arteriography as well as cardiac catheterization. All were over age 40 and had definite cardiac symptoms; 156 later had aortic valve replacement. Coronary lesions narrowing the lumen by 50% or more were present in 37% of patients aged 40 to 59 and 68% of those aged 60 to 82. Coronary disease was present in 64% of patients with angina pectoris and 33% of those without angina. Angina which occurred only in association with dyspnea on exertion was associated with coronary disease in 45% of instances, whereas angina which also occurred on exertion without any dyspnea or which occurred with emotional stress, after meals, during sleep, or at rest unprovoked was associated with coronary disease in 80% of instances. Patients with coronary disease without any chest pain or with atypical pain considered nonanginal were men, usually over age 60, with congestive heart failure as the predominant symptom. Electrocardiograms showing transmural inferior or anterolateral infarction nearly always indicated coronary disease, while QS patterns in Leads V1-2 occurred frequently with normal coronary arteries. Serum cholesterol was elevated in 23% of those with coronary disease and 8% of those without. A group of patients with moderate aortic stenosis could be identified, with aortic valve areas of 0.55 to 0.80 cm. per square meter, in whom coronary disease was the sole or chief cause of symptoms. The operative mortality rate with aortic valve replacement was 9.6% in those with coronary disease and 1.4% in those without significant coronary disease. Coronary disease is frequently present in patients with calcific aortic stenosis, particularly in those over 60, those with angina, and those with symptoms despite only moderate aortic stenosis. The type of anginal syndrome, the ECG evidence of transmural infarction, and the coronary risk factors provide additional clues for clinical diagnosis.     

Association of aortic valve sclerosis and coronary artery disease in patients with severe nonischemic mitral regurgitation

BACKGROUND: The presence of aortic valve sclerosis accounts for a higher rate of ischemic events and increased cardiovascular mortality. It may reflect coronary artery disease (CAD) because of a shared pathologic background. HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to analyze whether the presence of aortic valve sclerosis might help in identifying patients with coronary atherosclerosis among those with severe nonischemic mitral regurgitation (MR), who undergo coronary angiography before surgery for screening, and not because of suspected ischemic heart disease. METHODS: In all, 84 patients (mean age 64 +/- 9 years; 71% men) with mitral valve prolapse and severe regurgitation underwent echocardiography and coronary angiography. Aortic valve sclerosis was defined as focal areas of increased echogenicity and thickening of the leaflets without restriction of leaflet motion on echocardiography. Coronary artery disease was defined by the presence/absence of atherosclerotic plaques, independent of the degree of stenosis. RESULTS: Coronary artery disease was diagnosed in 47.6% of patients with and 15.8% of those without aortic valve sclerosis (p = 0.008). On logistic regression analysis, the presence of aortic valve sclerosis predicted CAD (odds ratio 3.3, 95% confidence interval 1.03-10.5; p = 0.04) independent of age. In female patients, the risk ratio for CAD in the presence of aortic valve sclerosis was 9. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary artery atherosclerosis and aortic valve sclerosis are closely associated in patients with severe nonischemic MR.     

Frequency of angina pectoris and coronary artery disease in severe isolated valvular aortic stenosis

A consecutive series of 192 patients (121 men and 71 women, mean age 59 years, range 28 to 82) with isolated, severe valvular aortic stenosis was with isolated, severe valvular aortic stenosis was analyzed retrospectively to determine the relation of angina pectoris and coronary risk factors to angiographically significant coronary artery disease (CAD). Significant CAD (diameter reduction greater than or equal to 50%) was found in 47 patients (24%). Angina was present in 83% of them, but it was also found in 61% of the non-CAD patients. This symptom had as a result a low positive predictive value (31%). Of the patients without angina (n = 65) 12% had significant CAD. The negative predictive value of angina alone was thus 88%. By using multivariate logistic regression, a risk score could be calculated based on angina, age and sex, which increased the negative predictive value to 95%. It was concluded that coronary arteriography can only be omitted in severe aortic valvular stenosis, when patients have no angina and when they are less than 40 years of age for men and less than 50 years for women. For all other cases, coronary arteriography should be recommended.     

Angina pectoris and coronary artery disease in isolated, severe aortic regurgitation

Seventy-eight patients with isolated, severe aortic regurgitation (AR) were studied retrospectively to determine the prevalence of angiographically significant coronary artery disease (CAD) and its relation to angina pectoris (AP). Angiographically, significant CAD was present in 29 of 78 patients (37%), and 36 patients (46%) had AP. Twenty-one of 36 patients (58%) with AP and 8 of 42 patients (19%) without AP had angiographically significant CAD. AP as a predictor of significant CAD had a sensitivity of 73%, specificity of 69% and a risk ratio of 3:1. The predictive accuracy of detecting CAD in the absence of AP was 81%. The benefit from concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting at the time of aortic valve replacement for AR has not been clearly demonstrated; therefore, routine coronary angiography is still recommended for all AR patients older than 40 years undergoing aortic valve replacement.