Efficacy of multikinase inhibitors in the treatment of advanced renal cell cancer. A snapshot

Due to the chemoresistance of renal cell cancer, cytokine-based therapeutic approaches were considered the standard treatment for patients with metastatic disease. At present, data that are available from a few phase II/III studies, dealing both with the first- and second-line treatment of patients suffering from systemic progression of RCC, indicate the significantly higher clinical efficacy of multikinase inhibitors when compared with cytokine-based therapeutic regimens. In this context, sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY 43-9006) and sunitinib (Sutent, SU 011248) are the most frequently applied and most intensively investigated substances. In Germany, with regard to a phase III study reported at the ASCO congress in 2006, sunitinib received approval for the first-line therapy of metastatic RCC. The application of multikinase inhibitors follows the principle of targeting such mediators that are considered to be substantially involved in the pathogenesis and particularly progression of renal cell cancer within relatively well-defined molecular pathways. The aim of the present paper is to address and to critically discuss the clinical data that are currently available regarding the therapeutic efficacy of kinase inhibitors during the treatment of metastatic RCC.     

Wirksamkeit von Multikinaseinhibitoren in der Therapie des fortgeschrittenen Nierenzellkarzinoms

Due to the chemoresistance of renal cell cancer, cytokine-based therapeutic approaches were considered the standard treatment for patients with metastatic disease. At present, data that are available from a few phase II/III studies, dealing both with the first- and second-line treatment of patients suffering from systemic progression of RCC, indicate the significantly higher clinical efficacy of multikinase inhibitors when compared with cytokine-based therapeutic regimens. In this context, sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY 43-9006) and sunitinib (Sutent, SU 011248) are the most frequently applied and most intensively investigated substances. In Germany, with regard to a phase III study reported at the ASCO congress in 2006, sunitinib received approval for the first-line therapy of metastatic RCC. The application of multikinase inhibitors follows the principle of targeting such mediators that are considered to be substantially involved in the pathogenesis and particularly progression of renal cell cancer within relatively well-defined molecular pathways. The aim of the present paper is to address and to critically discuss the clinical data that are currently available regarding the therapeutic efficacy of kinase inhibitors during the treatment of metastatic RCC.     

Sequential therapies with sorafenib and sunitinib in advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Purpose  

To investigate whether patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma benefit from sequential therapies with the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) sorafenib and sunitinib.     

Hypothyroidism correlates with a better prognosis in metastatic renal cancer patients treated with sorafenib or sunitinib

Purpose  

To investigate prognostic markers in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) undergoing treatment with the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) sorafenib (So) or sunitinib (Su).     

Systemische und operative Therapie des metastasierten Nierenzellkarzinoms

Several targeted therapies have become available for first-line (sunitinib, bevacizumab, pazopanib, temsirolimus) and second-line (sorafenib, pazopanib, everolimus) use in recent years. The superior outcomes achieved with these targeted agents have led to replacement of the formerly administered cytokines. New developments have raised the question of whether patients benefit from sequential therapies with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and/or whether combination regimes can improve clinical outcomes. This review gives an overview of the current therapeutic options for first- and second-line treatment in metastatic RCC as well as sequential and combination therapies. Adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment options are being discussed. Furthermore, this review addresses surgical alternatives in the treatment of RCC.     

Treatment of brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma with sunitinib and radiotherapy: Our experience and review of the literature

The present study reports our experience with five renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients with brain metastases treated with sunitinib and radiotherapy. All patients had undergone radical nephrectomy. Before treatment with sunitinib, radiotherapy for brain metastases, either by γ‐knife surgery or whole brain radiation, was carried out. After treatment with sunitinib, shrinkage of brain metastases was achieved in all patients with complete response, partial response and stable disease in two, one and two patients, respectively. Although progression of brain metastases occurred in four of the five patients, additional γ‐knife surgery was effective in three patients. Over a 12.5‐month follow up, four patients, including three who maintained their best response, remained alive. The remaining one patient died of disease progression. Despite the observation of several adverse events after treatment with sunitinib, there was no intracerebral hemorrhage in any patient. These findings suggest that sunitinib combined with radiation therapy can be safely carried out in RCC patients with brain metastases and provides a favorable prognosis in these cases. However, considering their frequent progression, it would be important to carry out careful follow up for these patients by focusing on the control of brain metastases.     

Use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with metastatic kidney cancer receiving haemodialysis: a retrospective Italian survey

Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Sunitinib and sorafenib are orally administered multikinase inhibitors approved for the treatment of advanced RCC. The limited pharmacokinetics data on sunitinib and sorafenib suggest that haemodialysis does not significantly alter plasma concentrations. In this retrospective study we define the safety and efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) and end‐stage renal disease requiring haemodialysis. Even though the retrospective nature of this survey and the relatively small sample size represent major limitations, these data indicate that treatment with sunitinib and sorafenib in this cohort of patients is feasible with no unexpected toxicity and good efficacy, results similar to those in the general population of patients with mRCC.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To investigate the safety and efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and end‐stage renal disease requiring haemodialysis (HD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? Between July 2006 and December 2010, 24 patients undergoing HD were treated with sunitinib and/or sorafenib for mRCC in 14 Italian institutions.
• ? We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of these patients to evaluate the administered doses of TKIs, treatment‐related toxicities and the clinical response to therapy.

RESULTS

• ? Sunitinib was administered at 50 mg daily for 4–6 weeks in six patients, 37.5 mg daily for 4–6 weeks in seven patients (one patient subsequently increased the dose to 50 mg daily), 25 mg daily for 4–6 weeks in two patients and 12.5 mg daily for 4–6 weeks in one patient. Among the eight patients treated with sorafenib, four patients received 800 mg daily (400 mg every 12 h), three patients 400 mg daily and one patient 200 mg daily with a continuous schedule.
• ? The estimated median progression‐free and overall survival periods of this cohort of patients were 10.3 months and 22.6 months, respectively.
• ? With regard to tolerability and safety, no unexpected adverse events were registered and no grade 4 haematological or non‐haematological toxicities were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

• ? Sunitinib and sorafenib treatment is not contraindicated in patients with mRCC undergoing HD.
• ? The outcome of this patient population is similar to that observed in patients with normal renal function treated with TKIs.
• ? These results merit further confirmation by a larger prospective trial.

     

Clinical effect and future considerations for molecularly-targeted therapy in renal cell carcinoma

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway activation leads to the angiogenic phenotype of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Several different strategies targeting various aspects of this pathway have emerged as standard therapy in metastatic RCC. Bevacizumab, a VEGF ligand-binding antibody, sunitinib and sorafenib, small molecule inhibitors of the VEGF receptor, as well as temsirolimus, an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) have all shown substantial clinical activity in metastatic RCC. Several relevant clinical aspects have also emerged with use of these agents such as defining resistance, measurement of response, and combination therapy.     

Predictors of response to sequential sunitinib and the impact of prior VEGF-targeted drug washout in patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma

Objective

To identify factors that can be used to identify metastatic clear cell RCC patients more likely to benefit from sequential sunitinib.

Patients and methods

We identified patients who failed sorafenib or bevacizumab and subsequently received sunitinib. We looked at objective response rates (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) to sunitinib in relation to baseline clinical variables.

Results

Seventy-one patients received sunitinib sequential therapy. Median duration of follow-up after starting sunitinib was 9.3 months. Median PFS was 5.8 months; median OS was not reached. Significantly higher ORR was seen in patients with normal hemoglobin (25.6%) [defined as >12 gm/dl for female; >13 gm/dl for male]. In addition, a shorter PFS for patients with low hemoglobin, and patients with time from diagnosis to first treatment ≤1 year was found. There was a shorter OS for patients ≥60 years old, with brain metastasis, low hemoglobin, and time from diagnosis to treatment ≤1 year. There was no difference in ORR, PFS, or OS in patients who started sunitinib after or within a 30-day period.

Conclusions

Metastatic clear-cell RCC patients with anemia have less clinical benefit from sequential sunitinib after failure of bevacizumab or sorafenib. Other factors associated with poor outcome include brain metastases, older age, and <1 year between diagnosis and first treatment. Importantly, no difference in outcomes was observed if sequential therapy was initiated within or after 30 days. External validation and prospective evaluation are needed to confirm these findings.     

An update on the medical therapy of advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma

The effectiveness of multikinase inhibitors in first- and second-line therapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been evaluated in various clinical studies. Initial results indicate an increased response rate and a prolonged progression-free survival compared with cytokine-containing therapeutic approaches. The new multitargeted kinase inhibitors sorafenib (Nexavar/BAY 43-9006) and sunitinib (Sutent/SUO 11248) interfere mainly with vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor pathways. Recently, temsirolimus, a specific inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin, demonstrated activity in RCC patients with poor prognosis. This review discusses the effectiveness of the most frequently used substances for systemically progressive RCC in consideration of the currently available clinical data.     

Abnormalities of thyroid function in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sorafenib: A prospective evaluation

The objective of this study was to characterize features of thyroid dysfunction in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who were treated with sorafenib. We performed a prospective observational study including 69 Japanese patients who were diagnosed as having metastatic RCC refractory to cytokine therapy and subsequently treated with sorafenib for at least 12 weeks. Thyroid function was assessed before and every 4 weeks after the initiation of sorafenib treatment. Of the 69 patients, 23 (33.3%) did not show any biochemical thyroid abnormality, while the remaining 46 (67.7%) developed hypothyroidism. However, 11 (23.9%) of these 46 hypothyroid patients initially had a suppressed thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) value accompanying the increase in free triiodothyronine (T3) and/or free thyroxine (T4) before developing hypothyroidism, suggesting sorafenib-induced thyroiditis. During the observation period of this study, 4 patients (5.8%) demonstrated severe clinical symptoms caused by hypothyroidism and received thyroid hormone replacement. Among several factors examined, only age was significantly associated with the risk for hypothyroidism. These findings suggest that although the incidence of clinically significant hypothyroidism requiring thyroid hormone replacement therapy was not very high, biochemical thyroid abnormality was frequently observed in Japanese RCC patients treated with sorafenib. Accordingly, regular surveillance of thyroid function by the measurement of TSH, free T3, and T4 is warranted during sorafenib treatment in Japanese RCC patients.     

Targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-receptor-signaling in renal cell carcinoma

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is resistant to conventional chemotherapy. Combined data for a variety of immunotherapies resulted in an overall chance of partial (PR) or complete remission (CR) of only 12.9%. There is a clear need for novel, more effective therapies to prevent relapse, control metastases and improve overall survival. Improved understanding of RCC disease biology has led to the introduction of molecularly targeted treatment strategies in these cancers. Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene inactivation is observed in most clear cell renal carcinoma, resulting in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) over-expression and driving the malignant phenotype. This review discusses the efficacy of novel therapies targeting the VEGF receptor (VEGFR) (e.g. anti-VEGF antibodies, VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors), some of which were recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration/European Medicines Evaluation Agency (FDA/EMEA) and represent the new treatment standards in RCC patients.     

Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma and renal pelvic cancer

A better understanding of the molecular biology of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and the emergence of molecular targeted drugs have revolutionized the treatment for patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC). Multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (sorafenib and sunitinib) and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (temsirolimus and everolimus) have recently shown superiority over interferon-α or placebo. However, while the molecular targeted drugs have demonstrated encouraging results, these drugs have also sometimes induced unexpected adverse events. Control of adverse events is important to obtain the maximum effectiveness and sustain quality of life for patients. Because renal pelvic cancer has many similarities in pathogenesis with urinary bladder cancer, the same chemotherapeutic regimen is often proposed for patients with metastatic renal pelvic cancer. Combined chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin is now widely considered to be first-line chemotherapy against these metastatic diseases; however, there are still unresolved problems with this treatment, including the limited survival benefit. To select new therapeutic modalities, a more profound understanding of the molecular biology of renal pelvic cancer is crucial. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current evidence supporting the role and activities of new chemotherapeutic agents and to reveal potential future directions in the management of mRCC and renal pelvic cancer.     

Clinical and laboratory prognostic factors in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib and sorafenib after progression on cytokines

ObjectivesThe aim of this retrospective study was to analyze prognostic factors in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) sunitinib or sorafenib after progression on cytokine therapy.Materials and methodsA national database of patients treated with targeted agents was used as the data source. A total of 319 patients treated with sunitinib (n = 181) or sorafenib (n = 138) after progression on cytokine therapy were analyzed.ResultsPrognostic factors significantly associated with poor overall survival in a multivariable Cox model included the time from diagnosis to the start of treatment with TKIs<1 year, increased neutrophil counts, increased lactate dehydrogenase, and Eastern Oncology Cooperative Group performance status 2 or higher. The parameters showing statistically significant association with progression-free survival included time from diagnosis to the beginning of treatment with TKI<1 year, increased lactate dehydrogenase, and Eastern Oncology Cooperative Group performance status 2 or higher. We have also validated the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium prognostic model in our cohort of patients.ConclusionWe demonstrate that the International Database Consortium prognostic model performs well for European patients treated with TKIs, including sunitinib or sorafenib, after progression on cytokines and suggest that a reduction from original 6 down to 4 parameters is possible.     

Sequential use of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors sorafenib and sunitinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective outcome analysis

Background

To date, few data are available about the sequential use of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) sorafenib and sunitinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

Objective

To investigate the effectiveness of the use of sunitinib after progression under sorafenib in mRCC.

Design, setting, and participants

A retrospective analysis of 30 patients with progressive mRCC, treated with sorafenib between May 2005 and February 2008. When radiologic progression was diagnosed, treatment was switched to sunitinib and continued until a further tumour progression occurred.

Measurements

Radiologic evaluation of the treatment results was performed every 3 mo according to the criteria for Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Adverse effects and therapeutic abnormalities (eg, dose reduction) were documented during regular visits.

Results and limitations

Of the patients, 50% benefited from the secondary use of sunitinib. In detail, a radiologically confirmed new disease stabilisation or partial response was observed in seven and eight patients, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 8.7 mo and 10.3 mo under sorafenib and sunitinib, respectively. Overall, the median time from the initialisation of the first TKI until progression under therapy with the second TKI was 17.3 mo.To our knowledge, this is the second largest study reporting results of sequential therapy from sorafenib followed by sunitinib. However, the number of patients is still not extensive enough to settle this important question conclusively.

Conclusions

This study supports the hypothesis that sequential TKI therapy with the sorafenib followed by sunitinib has clinical validity in some patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma when progressive disease occurs under the initial TKI therapy.     

Response of renal lesions during systemic treatment with sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a single center experience with 14 patients

Purpose  

The tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sunitinib induces partial remissions (PR) in a substantial proportion of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Only little is known about the activity of sunitinib in renal lesions in patients with metastatic disease, as most patients with synchronous metastases receive palliative nephrectomy.     

Nebenwirkungsmanagement von Tyrosinkinaseinhibitoren in der Urologie

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors like sunitinib, sorafenib, pazopanib or axintinib are regarded the standard of care in the systemic therapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. However, the many side effects associated with this therapy pose challenges for the treating physician and the patient. This review offers an overview of the classification and the treatment of hypertension, which is one of the major side effects induced by all tyrosine kinase inhibitors, in order to improve treatment efficacy and patient compliance.     

Clinical study of brain metastasis of renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the natural history and the efficacy of treatments for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with brain metastasis, we reviewed 18 patients with this disease. METHODS: Out of 325 cases with RCC treated at Osaka University Hospital from 1957 to 1993, 18 (5.5%, male:female ratio 16:2) cases developed brain metastases. Median follow-up was 44 months after the initial treatment of the primary lesion. Twelve patients had surgical resection of brain metastases (surgical group), and 7 of them received adjuvant radiotherapy. Six patients with poor performance status were treated with supportive therapy alone (nonsurgical group). RESULTS: Of 18 RCC patients with brain metastasis, 16 were male and 2 female. All brain metastases except for 1 case were symptomatic. Median interval between the initial treatment of the primary lesion and the diagnosis of brain metastasis was 19 months. The most frequent metastatic site prior to brain was the lung, which was detected in 7 cases (38.9%). Median survival of the entire group, measured from the onset of brain metastasis, was 9.5 months. One-year survival rate after the diagnosis of brain metastasis was 43.2% (64.8% in surgical group, 0% in nonsurgical group), 3-year 18.5% and 5-year 0%. Among 109 metastatic RCC, 14 patients were treated by lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) therapy. Out of 14 metastatic RCC patients treated by LAK therapy, 3 (21.4%) developed brain metastases. On the other hand, out of 95 metastatic RCC patients without LAK therapy, 15 (15.8%) had brain metastases. There was no significant difference in the rate of brain metastases between these two groups. CONCLUSION: There was a trend for prognosis of the surgical group to be better compared to that of the nonsurgical group, although it is not statistically significant. The optimum treatment for brain metastasis of RCC remains undefined, but our data suggested surgical resection in selected patients might contribute to prolonged survival of patients with brain metastasis. LAK therapy was not necessarily the risk factor of the brain metastasis.     

Understanding the importance of smart drugs in renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: To understand the mode of action of the currently most investigated new drugs in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and ultimately to analyze what should be the role of the urologist in this new therapeutic era. METHODS: A comprehensive review of the peer-reviewed literature was performed on the topic of molecular pathways involved in RCC angiogenesis, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and targeted molecular therapy for RCC. RESULTS: Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease has provided a model for understanding that the early inactivation of the VHL gene was responsible for accumulation of hypoxia-inducible factor and therefore activation of hypoxia-inducible genes such as VEGF, platelet-derived growth factor, erythropoietin, carbonic anhydrase IX and tumor growth factor alpha. The fact that such VHL inactivation also was found in up to 70% of sporadic RCC has been the rationale for developing new drugs targeting VEGF, VEGFR, platelet-derived growth factor receptor and tyrosine kinase receptors that are required for intracellular transduction. CONCLUSION: Initial results from phase 2 trials in metastatic disease are very promising. There is a strong rationale for initiating adjuvant trials with those kind of agents in patients with high-risk localised tumors. Urologists who have a good understanding of prognostic parameters in localised RCC particularly should be involved in such new approaches.