Digital mammography workflow

The advantages of digital mammography have been reported and debated for decades. In recent years, most U.S. breast imaging centers have added or planned to add a digital mammography unit for screening and diagnosing breast cancer. Adding digital imaging capability or transitioning to all-digital image acquisition introduces changes in practice and workflow that affect radiologists, radiologic technologists and patients.     

New tools for cost-effective delivery of breast imaging

Breast imaging has a deserved reputation as a very difficult financial proposition for hospitals. Regulation, low reimbursement, costly new technologies and staff shortages all combine to create an operational environment that is difficult, at best. While it may not be possible for every hospital to make breast imaging profitable, it is the obligation of every hospital to make this and all service lines as cost-effective as possible. While the typical care episode in a hospital will include several different services or procedures, the breast-imaging patient is typically in the department or breast center for a single procedure. Consequently, all of the administrative and facility costs of the patient encounter must be borne by the reimbursement for the single procedure. Breast imaging involves relatively expensive technology and highly-trained, and costly, technologists in its delivery. The costs of these inputs are relatively fixed; therefore material improvement can only be realized through the redesign of process. Analysis of the process of care delivery is critical to any discussion of the economics of breast imaging. Breast imaging can basically be divided into two categories: screening mammography and diagnostic procedures. This is a very important distinction, because screening mammography requires only general supervision, while the balance of breast imaging requires the direct supervision of the physician. Decoupling the physician from the examination allows the organization of screening delivery programs in highly efficient, high-throughput systems. On the diagnostic side of breast imaging, the primary economic enhancement that can be realized is from the delivery of more than one procedure during the patient visit. Mammography has high fixed costs (technology and technologist) and, where high fixed costs are found, profitability is determined by process and volume. Where process can be optimized to a level that will allow a positive return for each mammogram, volume becomes a multiplier. Responding to congressional pressure exerted in 2001, CMS increased the 2002 payment rate (global) for screening mammography from $69.23 (2001) to $81.81. The increase, however, was a mixed blessing, as it was all in the professional component ($22.18 to $35.48). In fact, the technical component was actually reduced by $0.74 from $47.07 to $46.33. While the reduction in payment for producing the screening mammogram is unjustified by the costs of producing that exam, the hardest blow was reserved for the payment rates for diagnostic mammography. As previously discussed, improving process and increasing volumes will improve the financial picture, but the problem of a single, low, procedure reimbursement remains. The implementation of CAD, however, has the ability to change that reality. CMS treats CAD as an add-on procedure. It cannot be billed as a stand-alone charge, but it is paid when billed in conjunction with a screening or diagnostic mammogram. The implications of the add-on character of CAD reimbursement are disproportionate to the amount of the payment, because it does not have to carry any costs other than those directly involved in its delivery. Breast imaging in general, and mammography specifically, will continue to present a challenge to the radiology administrator. With proper attention to process and volumes, and the very important contribution of CAD, however, breast imaging has the potential to not only pay its own way but to become profitable.     

Audit procedures in the National Breast Screening Study: mammography interpretation

Audit procedures for mammography interpretation in a national breast cancer screening program are described. Agreement between radiologists at five screening centers and a single reference radiologist was evaluated based on mammograms at initial screen in 739 women not known to have breast cancer and 204 breast cancer cases detected at or within a year of initial screen. Kappa statistics, used to measure agreement in the interpretation of mammograms between the reference and center radiologists beyond that attributable to chance, were 0.409 in women not known to have breast cancer, 0.472 in women with diagnosed breast cancer, and 0.493 for all women with p less than .0001 for all three categories. To our knowledge, this is the first report presenting measures of agreement made systematically, simultaneously, and on a continuing basis, during a screening program for quality assurance.     

Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists

PURPOSE: To evaluate performance parameters for radiologists in a practice of breast imaging specialists and general diagnostic radiologists who interpret a large series of consecutive screening and diagnostic mammographic studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data (ie, patient age; family history of breast cancer; availability of previous mammograms for comparison; and abnormal interpretation, cancer detection, and stage 0-I cancer detection rates) were derived from review of mammographic studies obtained from January 1997 through August 2001. The breast imaging specialists have substantially more initial training in mammography and at least six times more continuing education in mammography, and they interpret 10 times more mammographic studies per year than the general radiologists. Differences between specialist and general radiologist performances at both screening and diagnostic examinations were assessed for significance by using Student t and chi(2) tests. RESULTS: The study involved 47,798 screening and 13,286 diagnostic mammographic examinations. Abnormal interpretation rates for screening mammography (ie, recall rate) were 4.9% for specialists and 7.1% for generalists (P <.001); and for diagnostic mammography (ie, recommended biopsy rate), 15.8% and 9.9%, respectively (P <.001). Cancer detection rates at screening mammography were 6.0 cancer cases per 1,000 examinations for specialists and 3.4 per 1,000 for generalists (P =.007); and at diagnostic mammography, 59.0 per 1,000 and 36.6 per 1,000, respectively (P <.001). Stage 0-I cancer detection rates at screening mammography were 5.3 cancer cases per 1,000 examinations for specialists and 3.0 per 1,000 for generalists (P =.012); and at diagnostic mammography, 43.9 per 1,000 and 27.0 per 1,000, respectively (P <.001). CONCLUSION: Specialist radiologists detect more cancers and more early-stage cancers, recommend more biopsies, and have lower recall rates than general radiologists.     

Treatment of brain aneurysms

Up to 5% of the population may have an intracranial aneurysm, although many of these people are unaware of its presence. Most intracranial aneurysms remain asymptomatic, but a small proportion of them will rupture and bleed, causing life-threatening complications. Once diagnosed, treatment of aneurysms may include surgery or a minimally invasive endovascular coiling technique. As technologies improve and more aneurysms are deemed suitable for endovascular repair, there will be an increasing demand for radiologic technologists or radiologist assistants skilled in these complex diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.     

The role of the reference radiologist. Estimates of inter-observer agreement and potential delay in cancer detection in the national breast screening study

The Canadian National Breast Screening Study (NBSS) is a randomized controlled trial to assess the effect of screening on breast cancer mortality. The NBSS designated a single reference radiologist who blindly reviewed over the course of the study 5200 randomly selected two-view mammographic examinations of women not known to have breast cancer. He also reviewed 575 screening-detected breast cancer (SBC) cases and 102 interval breast cancer (IBC) cases. All cancers were histologically proven. As a result of the reviews, comments on inter-observer agreement, interpretation, and technical quality were conveyed on an ongoing basis to radiologists appointed to 15 NBSS screening centers. Agreement of the reference radiologist with center radiologists was better for breast cancer cases (kappa = 0.511, P less than .002) than for those not known to have breast cancer (kappa = 0.307, P less than .002). Observer error and technical problems led to delayed detection in 22% of SBCs and 35% of IBCs. Another 11% of SBCs and 58% of IBCs were probably mammographically occult. No similarly comprehensive review of mammography during a screening program has been published. Suggestions arising from the NBSS review were sometimes resisted by center radiologists. Measures are suggested which might facilitate acceptance of recommendations arising from audit mechanisms in mammography screening programs, thereby enhancing opportunities for mammographic excellence.     

The usefulness of computers in managing the operation of a mammography screening practice

A conventional desktop microcomputer can be programmed to carry out a wide variety of activities that are useful in the operation and management of a mammography screening practice. These include storage and retrieval of the records of screening examinations, direct entry of film interpretation data by the radiologist, automatic printing of examination reports, scheduling of screening appointments, tracking of follow-up procedures (including the generation of reminder letters to clients and referring physicians), and the conduct of medical audits of screening results. In general, computer-based activities can be completed more rapidly, more reliably, and at lower cost than the conventional operations they are designed to replace. All mammography screening practices can benefit from computer support.     

Interventional radiologic procedures in the investigation of lesions of the breast

The interventional radiologist who performs mammography does far more than read films; he examines every patient, punctures cysts, and localizes other breast lesions for precise excisional biopsy. With specimen radiography, he can confirm that suspicious lesions are completely removed by the surgeon and that the tissue in question is selected by the pathologist for examination. Pneumocystography can save the patient the unnecessary, disfiguring surgical removal of benign cysts. Those patients requiring biopsy may be scheduled for the procedure at once, and close cooperation with the surgeon greatly reduces the time the patient must wait to find out whether or not she has breast cancer. Thus, the interventional radiologist can improve the accuracy and speed of diagnosis of breast lesions, establish a definitive diagnosis and expedite the therapeutic management of benign cysts, and save the patient much of the anxiety commonly experienced in waiting for diagnostic results. The end result is better care at a lower cost to the patient and to society.     

Society of Breast Imaging residency and fellowship training curriculum

A recently developed Society of Breast Imaging curriculum for residency training is intended to provide guidance to residents and their mentors, and to practicing radiologists who want to keep up to date in screening, diagnosis, and interventional procedures. The curriculum contains lists of key concepts in 14 subject areas: epidemiology; anatomy; pathology, and physiology; equipment and technique; quality control; interpretation; problem-solving mammography; ultrasound; interventional procedures; reporting and medicolegal aspects; screening; MR imaging; therapeutic considerations; and patient management principles. The curriculum also makes recommendations about residency training, including the number of examinations the resident should interpret, and the time the resident should spend in breast imaging. Recommendations for fellowship training are also discussed.     

数字乳腺断层摄影及其合成二维影像技术在乳腺癌筛查中的研究进展

目前乳腺X线检查仍是乳腺癌早期诊断的有效检查方法之一,主要包括全视野数字化乳腺摄影（FFDM）、数字乳腺断层摄影（DBT）、合成乳腺X线摄影（SM）以及3种技术的联合应用（FFDM联合DBT、SM联合DBT）。对DBT、SM和SM联合DBT在乳腺筛查中诊断效能、影像质量及辐射剂量等进行比较。SM联合DBT可有效平衡辐射剂量和诊断效能,但仍然在判读时间、信息的存储与传输和检查成本方面存在局限性。就以上3种检查技术在乳腺癌筛查中的研究进展予以综述。     

Electronic Worklist Improves Timeliness of Screening Mammogram Interpretation in an Urban Underserved Population

ObjectivesTo evaluate the impact of an electronic workflow update on screening mammography turnaround time and time to diagnostic imaging for mammography performed on our urban mobile mammography van and at an urban community health center.MethodPrior to 10/15/2019, screening exams for the mammography van and urban community health center were made available for interpretation to a single designated radiologist via a manually generated paper list. On 10/15/2019, screening exams were routed electronically onto PACS for any breast radiologist across our Network to interpret. Screening mammogram turnaround time (defined as time form image acquisition to report finalization), time to diagnostic imaging, and time to tissue sampling were collected for pre- and post-implementation periods (6/1-9/30/2019 and 11/1/2019-2/29/2020, respectively) and compared via student t-test and statistical process control analyses.ResultsThe number of screening exams in the pre- and post-implementation periods were 851 and 728 exams, respectively. Patients were predominately Black and/or African American (400/1579, 25%), non-English speaking (858/1579, 54%) and insured by Medicaid (751/1579, 48%). After implementation of the electronic workflow, turnaround time decreased from 101.0 to 36.4 hours (63.9%, P <0.001) and statistical process control analyses showed sustained decrease in mean turnaround time. However, mean time to diagnostic imaging and tissue sampling were unchanged after implementation (39 vs 45, days; P = 0.330 and 43 vs 59; P = 0.187, respectively).ConclusionElectronic workflow management can reduce screening mammography turnaround time for underserved populations, but additional efforts are warranted to improve time to imaging follow-up for abnormal screening mammograms.     

Productivity of radiologists in 1997: estimates based on analysis of resource-based relative value units

OBJECTIVE: Productivity of radiologists was quantified using the resource-based relative value scale for examining trends in workload. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Staffing and workload data for 1997 were collected in a survey of radiology departments in multispecialty clinics. Workload ratios were calculated and were compared with prior surveys of the same clinics and with published data. RESULTS: Fifteen clinics reported 3,234,730 examinations and 1,860,729 resource-based relative value units (RBRVUs) performed by 284 radiologists and 28 fellows serving 6305 providers. Productivity ratios were as follows: physician index, 19 physicians per radiologist; provider index, 23 providers per radiologist; availability index, 0.78; difficulty index, 0.54 RBRVUs per examination; examination index, 11,559 examinations per year per radiologist; RBRVU index, 6090 RBRVUs per year per radiologist. Each index had roughly a twofold range of variation from lowest to highest ratio observed. Among diagnostic and interventional procedures, 37% of the supervision and interpretation RBRVUs were in general radiography, 41% in sectional imaging, and 22% in special procedures. Since 1973, the percentages of sectional imaging and special procedure examinations and RBRVUs have increased, and the difficulty index has increased. The physician index has been relatively stable. Non-supervision and interpretation codes constitute approximately 18% of the reported RBRVUs. RBRVU valuation of total radiology services has held steady or slightly increased between 1993 and 1997. CONCLUSION: RBRVU workload of radiologists in the clinics appears to be increasing primarily because of an increase in the percentages of highly valued sectional imaging and interventional and angiographic studies, which constituted 63% of the diagnostic imaging RBRVU workload. The ranges of the indexes among the clinics varies greatly.     

Improving the adherence of urban women to mammography guidelines: strategies for radiologists

Only 16% of women over 40 years of age are being screened regularly with mammography. To learn what radiologists and technologists can do to increase patient adherence to the screening guidelines of the American Cancer Society, especially by poor, urban women, the authors surveyed patients at a county facility immediately after mammography to document the patients' experiences with technologists and the procedure. Analysis of these data led to the conclusion that the radiologist should encourage an expanded role for the technologist as a breast health educator. By incorporating the use of a well-designed patient brochure, technologists can greatly enhance their effectiveness by decreasing the patient's anxiety and increasing her understanding of the procedure and of the importance of screening. Radiologists need to appreciate the potential of an expanded technologist's role for increasing future referrals.     

Current Status of Breast Ultrasound

Ultrasound (US) has a significant role in diagnostic breast imaging. It is most commonly used as an adjunctive test in characterizing lesions detected by other imaging modalities or by clinical examination. US is recognized as the modality of choice in the evaluation of women who are symptomatic and younger than 30 years of age, pregnant, or lactating. Combined mammography and US appear to have a role in screening high-risk populations. The use of standard Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System US lexicon is helpful in guiding the differentiation between benign and malignant sonographic signs. Biopsy is warranted when benign features are absent or for any feature consistent with malignancy, despite other benign findings. Whole breast and axillary US are useful in assessing tumour extension, multifocality, and the status of axillary lymph nodes. US is the modality of choice for guiding interventional breast procedures. The role of US as a guidance tool for nonoperative breast treatment is being investigated.     

The current state of the diagnostics of breast diseases in Lombardy

PURPOSE: The SIRM study group for senology in Lombardy set the following goals: to quantify the number of radiologist working in public radiology centers and in private credited hospitals in Lombardy; to quantify the number of radiologists working in diagnostic senology and the mean time they devote to this field; to survey the diagnostic equipment used for senology purposes and check its adequacy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We considered 58 centers of senology diagnostic imaging in the radiology departments of general hospitals in 8 Lombardy provinces. First we evaluated the screening programs for early breast cancer detection carried out with clinical mammography. All data were evaluated with reference to female residents aged 40 to 69, to the average adherence rates reported in the literature, to the protocols adopted in different centers relative to the examination frequency. Mammography was always associated with a physical examination and then the patient was submitted to radiological investigations to make the final diagnosis. The form we used for data report is summarized in Table I. RESULTS: In the centers for diagnostic senology we surveyed in 1998, in all 182,724 mammograms, 58,686 breast US examinations and 7,097 needle biopsies for cytology or microhistology were performed; 35.5% of the female population which should have been screened actually underwent the examination and 32.6% of them was also submitted to breast US, while 3.88% underwent FNAB. Sixty-three mammographic units and 62 US units were operated by 152 radiologists. An average 2,900 radiographic investigations per mammographic unit were performed yearly. Each radiologist reported an average 1,202 mammograms a year. Refer to the tables for detailed data reporting by province. Thirty-six per cent of radiologists presently reads more than 1,500 breast examinations a year. The radiologists working in diagnostic imaging in senology devote an average 20% of their working time to this field. As for the technical adequacy of mammographic and US equipment relative to some reference levels reported in detail in the paper, only 42% of the former and 48% of the latter were up to standards. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Despite the massive work done in the field of senology, the estimated needs of the female population have not been met yet, given the increased demand for senologic examinations and women's growing awareness of the need of early breast cancer diagnosis. The answer to this problem lies in a political health care policy that should promote the current clinical programs increasing both instrumental and human resources. Alternatively screening programs could be planned on a regional basis, with the pro of reaching a larger female population and that of a more homogeneous methodological approach. Our data indicate that breast cancer detection is best achieved with clinical and screening tools: the former can be easily promoted in a short time and could thus make our first goal, while the latter, which is more complex, could be implemented later. Thus, a growing clinical activity could make a very good basis for high quality breast screening programs. Finally, it is necessary to guarantee high quality standards for equipment, methods and training of medical and nonmedical staff.     

Observer variability in screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading

Full-field digital mammography (FFDM) with soft-copy reading is more complex than screen-film mammography (SFM) with hard-copy reading. The aim of this study was to compare inter- and intraobserver variability in SFM versus FFDM of paired mammograms from a breast cancer screening program. Six radiologists interpreted mammograms of 232 cases obtained with both techniques, including 46 cancers, 88 benign lesions, and 98 normals. Image interpretation included BI-RADS categories. A case consisted of standard two-view mammograms of one breast. Images were scored in two sessions separated by 5 weeks. Observer variability was substantial for SFM as well as for FFDM, but overall there was no significant difference between the observer variability at SFM and FFDM. Mean kappa values were lower, indicating less agreement, for microcalcifications compared with masses. The lower observer agreement for microcalcifications, and especially the low intraobserver concordance between the two imaging techniques for three readers, was noticeable. The level of observer agreement might be an indicator of radiologist performance and could confound studies designed to separate diagnostic differences between the two imaging techniques. The results of our study confirm the need for proper training for radiologists starting FFDM with soft-copy reading in breast cancer screening. Presented at ECR, Wien 2006.     

Providing professional mammography services: financial analysis

PURPOSE: To perform a financial analysis of mammography services to determine whether the key underlying economic drivers of this service are aligned with the public's expectations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The financial status of mammography services at seven university-based programs was assessed by using an extensive financial survey encompassing revenue, direct and indirect costs, and volume data for 1997 and 1998. At one of the institutions, an activity-based costing analysis was performed by procedure type: screening mammography, diagnostic mammography, breast ultrasonography, interventional procedures, and review of outside mammograms. RESULTS: All seven institutions incurred losses in the professional component of mammography services. The underlying financial problem was a negative contribution margin (total mammography revenues minus direct expenses). The driver of the financial loss was the volume of diagnostic mammograms, which generated a loss per procedure. Diagnostic mammogram volume drove the mammography full-time equivalent count (P =.039) and was highly and negatively correlated with contribution margin (P <.001). CONCLUSION: The reimbursement rate for mammography procedures, especially diagnostic mammography, needs to be increased to reflect the current reality of the resources necessary to maintain the accessibility and accuracy of this evolving mix of clinical services.     

The Impact of Nonphysician Providers on Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Practices: Operational and Educational Implications

The numbers of nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) are increasing throughout the entire health care enterprise, and a similar expansion continues within radiology. The use of radiologist assistants is growing in some radiology practices as well. The increased volume of services rendered by this growing nonphysician provider subset of the health care workforce within and outside radiology departments warrants closer review, particularly with regard to their potential influence on radiology education and medical imaging resource utilization. In this article (the second in a two-part series), the authors review recent literature and offer recommendations for radiology practices regarding the impact NPs, PAs, and radiologist assistants may have on interventional and diagnostic radiology practices. Their potential impact on medical education is also discussed. Finally, staffing for radiology departments, as a result of an enlarging nonradiology NP and PA workforce ordering diagnostic imaging, is considered.