The experience is CLEAR

Conventional amphotericin B has been the 'gold standard' for antifungal efficacy, but nephrotoxicity problems limit its clinical utility. In the late 1990s, three lipid-based formulations of amphotericin B were introduced, all of which offered comparable efficacy and reduced renal complications. However, to date, robust safety and comparative efficacy data have been sparse. This paper briefly reviews the available clinical data on amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC). Also, in detail, it reviews the findings of Collaborative Exchange of Antifungal Research (CLEAR), the most extensive dataset on systemic antifungal treatment with the lipid-based agent ABLC.     

Drug resistance in Cryptococcus neoformans

Cryptococcus neoformans has become a major opportunistic fungal pathogen worldwide. Successful treatment of invasive disease with this fungus has used amphotericin B, flucytosine and various azoles. However, treatment failures continue to occur for a variety of reasons including direct antifungal drug resistance. Issues and mechanisms for antifungal drug resistance in Cryptococcus neoformans are reviewed. Furthermore, approaches and strategies for prevention and treatment of antifungal drug resistance are identified and these include host immune modulation, dose optimization, prophylaxis/empirical regimens, improved drug delivery systems such as lipid preparations of amphotericin B, surgery, combination antifungal treatments and development of new antifungal agents.     

Caspofungin: pharmacology,safety and therapeutic potential in superficial and invasive fungal infections

Invasive fungal infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality in hospitalised patients. Current therapy with amphotericin B and antifungal triazoles has overlapping targets and is limited by toxicity and resistance. The echinocandin lipopeptide caspofungin is the first of a new class of antifungal compounds that inhibit the synthesis of 1,3-β-D-glucan. This homopolysaccharide is a major component of the cell wall of many pathogenic fungi and yet is absent in mammalian cells. It provides osmotic stability and is important for cell growth and cell division. In vitro, caspofungin has broad-spectrum antifungal activity against Candida and Aspergillus spp. without cross-resistance to existing agents. The compound exerts prolonged post-antifungal effects and fungicidal activity against Candida spp. and causes severe damage of Aspergillus fumigatus at the sites of hyphal growth. Animal models have demonstrated efficacy against disseminated candidiasis and disseminated and pulmonary aspergillosis, both in normal and in immunocompromised animals. Caspofungin possesses favourable pharmacokinetic properties and is not metabolised through the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system. It showed highly promising antifungal efficacy in Phase II and III clinical trials in immunocompromised patients with oesophageal candidiasis. Caspofungin was effective in patients with invasive aspergillosis intolerant or refractory to standard therapies. Based on its documented antifungal efficacy and an excellent safety profile, caspofungin has been approved recently by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis in patients who are refractory to or intolerant of other therapies (i.e., amphotericin B, lipid formulations of amphotericin B, and/or itraconazole). Phase III clinical trials in patients with candidaemia and in persistently febrile neutropenic patients requiring empirical antifungal therapy are ongoing. This paper reviews the preclinical and clinical pharmacology of caspofungin and its potential role for treatment of invasive and superficial fungal infections in patients.     

Antifungal combination therapy: where we stand.

Amphotericin B has been used in combination, simultaneously or sequentially, with fluconazole and itraconazole. However, there are no data from clinical trials to suggest the most appropriate use of these drug combinations. In vitro work has consistently described antagonism of polyenes and azoles, but new work suggests that hydrophilic azoles (e.g. fluconazole) with amphotericin B may not result in antagonistic effects, whereas lipophilic azoles (e.g. ketoconazole, itraconazole) antagonize the antifungal effects of amphotericin B. Experimental studies in animals with invasive candidiasis show that fluconazole and amphotericin B are not antagonistic and may be additive in their effects. In contrast, itraconazole and amphotericin B are antagonistic in this same murine candidiasis model. In animals infected with Aspergillus, itraconazole plus amphotericin B seem to be antagonistic when used simultaneously and possibly when used sequentially. Nevertheless, initial therapy with amphotericin B followed by itraconazole in patients with aspergillosis is a common clinical strategy. Recent data and concepts concerning the combined use of available antifungal drugs are discussed in this paper.     

Lipid-based amphotericin B for the treatment of fungal infections

The frequency of life-threatening fungal infections has increased dramatically over the past few decades. For more than 30 years amphotericin B has been the standard treatment for systemic and deep-seated fungal infections, primarily because of its broad spectrum of activity. Its usefulness is limited by a relatively high frequency of significant adverse events including infusion-related reactions and nephrotoxicity. In an effort to overcome these side effects, a number of lipid-based formulations were developed, each with its own composition and pharmacokinetic behavior. The clinical significance of these differences is unknown. Available clinical data suggest the formulations have a reduced propensity for causing nephrotoxicity. However, considering limited efficacy data, they should be reserved as second-line therapy for patients who cannot tolerate or fail an adequate trial of conventional amphotericin B or cannot benefit from other antifungal agents.     

Lipid-based antifungal agents: current status

Immunocompromised patients are well known to be predisposed to developing invasive fungal infections. These infections are usually difficult to diagnose and more importantly, the resulting mortality rate is high. The limited number of antifungal agents available and their high rate of toxicity are the major factors complicating the issue. However, the development of lipid-based formulations of existing antifungal agents has opened a new era in antifungal therapy. The best examples are the lipid-based amphotericin B preparations, amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC; Abelcet), amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD; Amphotec or Amphocil), and liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome). These formulations have shown that antifungal activity is maintained while toxicity is reduced. This progress is followed by the incorporation of nystatin into liposomes. Liposomal nystatin formulation is under development and studies of it have provided encouraging data. Finally, lipid-based formulations of hamycin, miconazole, and ketoconazole have been developed but remain experimental. Advances in technology of liposomes and other lipid formulations have provided promising new tools for management of fungal infections.     

Amphotericin B-Loaded Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) Nanofibers: An Alternative Therapy Scheme for Local Treatment of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis

Vulvovaginal candidiasis is an inflammation localized in the vulvovaginal area. It is mostly caused by Candida albicans. Its treatment is based on the systemic and local administration of antifungal drugs. However, this conventional therapy can fail owing to the resistance of the Candida species and noncompliance of patients. Amphotericin B-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanofibers are single-use, antifungal, controlled drug delivery systems, and represent an alternative therapeutic scheme for the local treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis. Nanofibers were characterized by analytical techniques and with an in vitro drug delivery study. In vitro and in vivo fungicidal activity of amphotericin B released from nanofibers was evaluated using the agar diffusion method and an experimental murine model of vulvovaginal candidiasis, respectively. Analytical techniques showed that amphotericin B was physically mixed in the polymeric nanofibers. Nanofibers controlled the delivery of therapeutic doses of amphotericin B for 8 consecutive days, providing effective in vitro antifungal activity and eliminated the in vivo vaginal fungal burden after 3 days of treatment and with only one local application. Amphotericin B-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanofibers could be potentially applied as an alternative strategy for the local treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis without inducing fungal resistance, yet ensuring patient compliance.     

Amphotericin B lipid complex for the treatment of invasive fungal infections

Amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC; Abelcet^®, Enzon Pharmaceuticals) has become the dominant marketed lipid amphotericin B compound to emerge since the approval of these agents from the mid-1990s onwards. This agent is a 1:1 combination of amphotericin B and a lipid moiety consisting of dimyristoyl phosphatidylcholine and dimyrisoyl phosphatidylcholine, which exists in a ribbon-like molecular structure. ABLC undergoes rapid reticuloendothelial uptake from the circulation and achieves significantly higher tissue concentrations in the liver, spleen and lung compared to comparably dosed conventional amphotericin B. ABLC is approved by the FDA for all mycoses in amphotericin B-intolerant or -refractory infection. Randomised, controlled trials of amphotericin B have shown comparable efficacy in candidiasis and an improved outcome in invasive aspergillosis versus historical controls. ABLC has demonstrated a reduced incidence of nephrotoxicity and infusion reactions versus amphotericin B. Comparative studies against other lipid formulations are quite limited and have shown variable differences in infusion toxicity, nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity and clinical efficacy. Postapproval experience has shown substantial efficacy for less common mycotic pathogens including zygomycosis. The precise position of ABLC versus both other lipid formulations and expanding formulary of new antifungal agents is in flux. Future studies which examine its clinical efficacy, role in combination therapy, toxicity and cost-effectiveness in these complex patients are needed.     

Amphotericin B lipid complex for the treatment of invasive fungal infections

Amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC; Abelcet, Enzon Pharmaceuticals) has become the dominant marketed lipid amphotericin B compound to emerge since the approval of these agents from the mid-1990s onwards. This agent is a 1:1 combination of amphotericin B and a lipid moiety consisting of dimyristoyl phosphatidylcholine and dimyrisoyl phosphatidylcholine, which exists in a ribbon-like molecular structure. ABLC undergoes rapid reticuloendothelial uptake from the circulation and achieves significantly higher tissue concentrations in the liver, spleen and lung compared to comparably dosed conventional amphotericin B. ABLC is approved by the FDA for all mycoses in amphotericin B-intolerant or -refractory infection. Randomised, controlled trials of amphotericin B have shown comparable efficacy in candidiasis and an improved outcome in invasive aspergillosis versus historical controls. ABLC has demonstrated a reduced incidence of nephrotoxicity and infusion reactions versus amphotericin B. Comparative studies against other lipid formulations are quite limited and have shown variable differences in infusion toxicity, nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity and clinical efficacy. Postapproval experience has shown substantial efficacy for less common mycotic pathogens including zygomycosis. The precise position of ABLC versus both other lipid formulations and expanding formulary of new antifungal agents is in flux. Future studies which examine its clinical efficacy, role in combination therapy, toxicity and cost-effectiveness in these complex patients are needed.     

Caspofungin: a review of its use in oesophageal candidiasis, invasive candidiasis and invasive aspergillosis

Echinocandins are a new class of antifungal agents with a novel mechanism of action (interference with fungal cell wall synthesis). Caspofungin (Cancidas), Caspofungin MSD) is the first echinocandin to be approved and is administered intravenously.Caspofungin 50 mg/day had similar efficacy to intravenous fluconazole 200 mg/day and was at least as effective as intravenous amphotericin B 0.5 mg/kg/day in patients with oesophageal candidiasis in two randomised, double-blind studies. A favourable combined clinical and endoscopic response occurred in 81% of caspofungin recipients versus 85% of fluconazole recipients and in 74% of caspofungin recipients versus 63% of amphotericin B recipients. A favourable combined response rate of approximate, equals 90% and approximate, equals 60% occurred in the stratum of patients with oesophageal candidiasis who received caspofungin or amphotericin B in a third randomised, double-blind study.Caspofungin (70 mg loading dose followed by 50 mg/day) had similar efficacy to intravenous amphotericin B (0.7-1.0 mg/kg/day in patients with neutropenia and 0.6-0.7 mg/kg/day in patients without neutropenia) in patients with invasive candidiasis in a double-blind, randomised trial. A favourable overall response occurred in 73.4% of caspofungin recipients and in 61.7% of amphotericin B recipients.In a noncomparative study, salvage therapy with caspofungin (70 mg loading dose followed by 50 mg/day) was effective in patients with invasive aspergillosis who were refractory to or did not tolerate standard antifungal therapy. A favourable response (complete plus partial response) occurred in 37 of 83 patients (45%).Caspofungin was generally well tolerated in clinical trials; it had similar tolerability to intravenous fluconazole and was better tolerated than intravenous amphotericin B. Significantly fewer caspofungin than amphotericin B recipients reported chills, fever, nausea or infusion-related adverse events. In conclusion, caspofungin is a valuable new antifungal agent with a novel mechanism of action. In comparative trials, caspofungin had similar efficacy to fluconazole and was at least as effective as amphotericin B in oesophageal candidiasis and had similar efficacy to amphotericin B in invasive candidiasis. In addition, caspofungin had similar tolerability to fluconazole and was better tolerated than amphotericin B in these indications. Caspofungin was also effective in patients with invasive aspergillosis who were refractory to or intolerant of standard antifungal agents. Thus, caspofungin provides an alternative to triazoles or amphotericin B in oesophageal candidiasis and an alternative to amphotericin B in invasive candidiasis, as well as being an effective salvage therapy in invasive aspergillosis.     

Safety of aerosolized amphotericin B

Aerosolized delivery of a number of antimicrobial agents has been studied. Despite a theoretical soundness behind this strategy, full consideration of the potential toxicities associated with this mode of administration is imperative. Aerosolized amphotericin B, as both deoxycholate and lipid formulations, has been studied in a variety of high-risk patient populations for prophylaxis and treatment against fungal infections. Although available data remain inconclusive regarding the clinical efficacy of this therapy, variability among results may be due to lack of standardization of administration methods and doses. Akin to the lack of clinical consensus, data regarding the tolerability of this means of amphotericin B delivery are conflicting. This variability may again be accounted for by the lack of standardized means for aerosolized administration. Owing to uncertain clinical benefit and concern for pulmonary toxicities, the use of aerosolized amphotericin B should be limited to clinical investigations at this time.     

Liposomes in the treatment of infectious diseases

Phospholipids and other polar lipids can form liposomes and similar colloidal particles that can be used as drug carrier systems. The potential of liposomal delivery systems to increase the therapeutic index (efficacy to safety ratio) of clinically important drugs has been realised with the recent approval of liposomal oncologic and antifungal drugs. The application of liposomes to the treatment of infectious diseases initially focused on intracellular pathogens, based on the natural targeting of liposomes to phagocytic cells and on the antifungal drug amphotericin B, based on its unique affinity for lipids. Recent studies with small, low-clearance liposomes have shown that more specialised formulations may provide benefits over simpler ‘first generation’ liposomes for the treatment of infectious diseases, including prolonged residence in plasma, increased tissue exposure and targeting to sites of infection. These improved biopharmaceutical properties have been associated with both curative and prophylactic activity against a range of non-intracellular pathogens, including Staphylococcus and Klebsiella. These and other highly engineered liposome formulations may provide effective delivery systems for specific antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral indications in the future. Adequate patent protection will be crucial in fully exploiting these advanced liposome technologies and in maintaining market share for liposomal products. This review discusses some of the patent issues related to liposomes and their use in the treatment of infectious diseases.     

Fluconazole,caspofungin, voriconazole in combination with amphotericin B

Combined antifungal therapy has been suggested to enhance the efficacy and reduce the toxicity of antifungal agents. The aim of the study was to investigate the in vitro synergistic activity of caspofungin, voriconazole, and fluconazole with amphotericin B against ten isolates of Candida parapsilosis and Candida albicans strains which were resistant to azoles or amphotericin B. Three different antifungal combinations (amphotericin B [AP] — caspofungin [CS], amphotericin B — fluconazole [FL], and AP — voriconazole [VO]) were evaluated for in vitro synergistic effect by the microdilution checkerboard and E-test methods. For the majority of strains, the combination test showed indifferent activity. Via the E-test method, synergistic activity was seen in 3 strains in response to AP-CS combination treatment and in one strain after administration of AP-FL; however, no synergy was observed in response to combination treatment with P-VO. Antagonistic activity was the result in 1 strain treated with AP-CS as well as in 6 strains treated with AP-FL and AP-VO combinations. Via the microdilution test, no synergistic activity was seen after treatment with all 3 combinations. Antagonistic activity was the result in 2 strains with AP-CS, in 6 strains with AP-VO and in 5 strains with AP-FL combinations. Agreement between the checkerboard and E-test methods was observed to be approximately 72%. These combinations may be used in the case of antifungal resistance.     

The reformulation of Amphotericin B for oral administration to treat systemic fungal infections and visceral leishmaniasis

Amphotericin B (AmB) is a parenterally administered broad-spectrum antifungal and leishmanicidal drug that has been on the market for over sixty years. Unfortunately, significant infusion-related side effects and renal toxicity often accompany treatment, limiting its clinical applications. Lipid-based formulations have somewhat ameliorated the associated toxicity, but the increased cost of formulations restricts widespread use. AmB is amphipathic and exhibits low solubility and permeability, resulting in negligible absorption when administered orally. Advances in drug delivery systems have overcome some of the solubility issues that prevent oral bioavailability and new formulations are currently in development. The existence of an effective, safe and inexpensive oral formulation of amphotericin B would have significant applications for the treatment of disseminated fungal infections and would dramatically expand access to treatment of visceral leishmaniasis by introducing a readily available highly tolerated oral formulation of a drug with known efficacy.     

What is the current and future status of conventional amphotericin B?

Amphotericin B deoxycholate has been the 'gold standard' treatment for invasive fungal infections for over 40 years. Driven to improve on the renal toxicity of amphotericin B deoxycholate, extensive pharmaceutical research has led to the development of several new antifungals including lipid formulations of amphotericin B, broad-spectrum azoles and echinocandins. Compared with amphotericin B deoxycholate, the lipid formulations of amphotericin B (amphotericin B lipid complex, amphotericin B colloidal dispersion and liposomal amphotericin B) share distinct advantages in improved drug safety, in particular reduced incidence and severity of amphotericin B deoxycholate-related nephrotoxicity. However, the lipid formulations of amphotericin B are significantly more expensive than amphotericin B deoxycholate and, as for many of these new antifungals, there are as yet insufficient published studies to guide clinicians. This paper examines aspects of safety, efficacy, and health economic data for the lipid formulations of amphotericin B in particular, in order to provide a rationale to justify substituting amphotericin B deoxycholate with the lipid formulations of amphotericin B.     

Systemic antifungal therapy: new options, new challenges

The frequency of invasive fungal infections has increased dramatically in recent decades because of an expanding population at risk. Until now, treatment options for invasive mycoses have been primarily amphotericin B and the azoles, fluconazole and itraconazole. Traditional agents are limited by an inadequate spectrum of activity, drug resistance, toxicities, and drug-drug interactions. The recent approval of caspofungin and voriconazole clearly has expanded the number of existing antifungal drugs available. However, the enthusiasm that accompanies their availability is counterbalanced by limited clinical experience, high drug acquisition costs, and distinctive toxicities. The pharmacologic characteristics, extent of clinical experience (efficacy and toxicity), and drug acquisition costs among available systemic antifungal agents are compared, with emphasis on the new agents. Also, recommendations on the role of each agent are provided according to the most common indications for systemic antifungal therapy: invasive candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, and febrile neutropenia.     

Novel modes of antifungal drug administration

Administration of antifungals by routes other than that for which the agent was designed or approved have been utilised in attempts to provide directed therapy, reduce adverse effects and improve drug penetration into selected infection sites, such as the central nervous system, lungs and peritoneum. The most widely investigated agent utilising a novel method of drug delivery is amphotericin B. Dose forms for this agent include topicals (aerosol, nasal spray, irrigations, pastes, absorbable sponges, impregnated bone cement and gelatin), oral dosage forms (solutions, suspensions, tablets and so on) and ophthalmic preparations (drops, ointments and injections). Amphotericin B has been administered by routes such as oral, endobronchial, intrathecal, intracisternal, intra-articular, intraperitoneal, ophthalmic and as an antibiotic ‘line lock’. Nystatin has been administered as an aerosol, percutaneous paste and bladder washes. Azoles, such as miconazole, fluconazole, ketoconazole and posaconazole, have been administered by novel methods but to a lesser degree. Most of these reports involve miconazole. The dose forms and routes of administration for azoles have included irrigants (bladder, joint), ophthalmic preparations (eye drops, intraocular injections, ointments), impregnated bone cement, endobronchial and intrathecal administration. Finally, both methylene blue (bladder washes) and flucytosine (peritoneal lavage, ophthalmic eye drops) have also been employed. Adequate evaluations of both the safety and efficacy of these therapies are most often hindered by prior or concomitant antifungal therapies, comorbidities and the lack of controlled clinical trials. In addition, the availability of newer treatment options, which demonstrate significant improvement in drug distribution and treatment-related adverse effects make many such novel modes of administration less practical or necessary. In contrast, the inhalation of antifungal aerosols, such as amphotericin B, is rapidly becoming a viable prophylactic option.     

Novel modes of antifungal drug administration

Administration of antifungals by routes other than that for which the agent was designed or approved have been utilised in attempts to provide directed therapy, reduce adverse effects and improve drug penetration into selected infection sites, such as the central nervous system, lungs and peritoneum. The most widely investigated agent utilising a novel method of drug delivery is amphotericin B. Dose forms for this agent include topicals (aerosol, nasal spray, irrigations, pastes, absorbable sponges, impregnated bone cement and gelatin), oral dosage forms (solutions, suspensions, tablets and so on) and ophthalmic preparations (drops, ointments and injections). Amphotericin B has been administered by routes such as oral, endobronchial, intrathecal, intracisternal, intra-articular, intraperitoneal, ophthalmic and as an antibiotic 'line lock'. Nystatin has been administered as an aerosol, percutaneous paste and bladder washes. Azoles, such as miconazole, fluconazole, ketoconazole and posaconazole, have been administered by novel methods but to a lesser degree. Most of these reports involve miconazole. The dose forms and routes of administration for azoles have included irrigants (bladder, joint), ophthalmic preparations (eye drops, intraocular injections, ointments), impregnated bone cement, endobronchial and intrathecal administration. Finally, both methylene blue (bladder washes) and flucytosine (peritoneal lavage, ophthalmic eye drops) have also been employed. Adequate evaluations of both the safety and efficacy of these therapies are most often hindered by prior or concomitant antifungal therapies, comorbidities and the lack of controlled clinical trials. In addition, the availability of newer treatment options, which demonstrate significant improvement in drug distribution and treatment-related adverse effects make many such novel modes of administration less practical or necessary. In contrast, the inhalation of antifungal aerosols, such as amphotericin B, is rapidly becoming a viable prophylactic option.     

Therapeutic strategies for invasive fungal infections in neonatal and pediatric patients

Invasive Candida and Aspergillus infections are the most commonly encountered fungal infections. They appear to be life threatening in the setting of profound immunosuppression, whereas cases that are resistant to antifungal therapy are occasionally encountered. Novel antifungal triazole and echinocandin agents appear to exhibit good activity as first-line or salvage therapy, whereas the use of amphotericin B formulations is particularly valuable in neonates. Significant differences in toxicity have been demonstrated among various antifungal agents with in vitro activity from available comparative data on fungal infections in children: however, no clear difference in treatment efficacy has been demonstrated. However, very little data are available about neonates. Host factors and responsible fungal species most frequently guide the choice of therapy.     

Caspofungin: a review of its use in the treatment of fungal infections

Caspofungin (Cancidas) is the first of a new class of antifungal agents, the echinocandins, that inhibit the synthesis of the fungal cell wall component beta-(1,3)-D-glucan. Caspofungin is administered once daily by slow intravenous infusion and is used to treat infections caused by Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp.Caspofungin is a valuable new antifungal agent with a novel mechanism of action. In comparative clinical trials, caspofungin was no less effective than liposomal amphotericin B in the empirical treatment of neutropenic patients with persistent fever, amphotericin B deoxycholate in the treatment of invasive candidiasis or fluconazole in the treatment of oesophageal candidiasis. Caspofungin also displayed broadly similar efficacy to amphotericin B deoxycholate in oesophageal or oropharyngeal candidiasis and was effective as salvage therapy in patients with invasive aspergillosis who were refractory to or intolerant of standard therapy. The tolerability profile of caspofungin was similar to that of fluconazole and superior to that of amphotericin B deoxycholate and liposomal amphotericin B. Therefore, in the appropriate indications, caspofungin is a viable alternative to amphotericin B deoxycholate, liposomal amphotericin B or fluconazole.