Role of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis.

Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements of spine and hip bone mineral density (BMD) (referred to here as central DXA) have an important role as a clinical tool for the evaluation of individuals at risk of osteoporosis, and in helping clinicians give advice to patients about the appropriate use of antifracture treatment. Compared with alternative bone densitometry techniques such quantitative computed tomography (QCT), peripheral DXA (pDXA) and quantitative ultrasound (QUS), central DXA has a number of significant advantages that include a consensus that BMD results can be interpreted using the World Health Organization (WHO) T-score definition of osteoporosis, a proven ability to predict fracture risk, and proven effectiveness at targeting antifracture treatments. This review article discusses the evidence for these and other advantages of central DXA, including its role in the new WHO algorithm for treating patients on the basis of individual fracture risk.     

Can novel clinical densitometric techniques replace or improve DXA in predicting bone strength in osteoporosis at the hip and other skeletal sites?

New peripheral techniques are now available for the diagnosis of osteoporosis, but their value in the clinical management of the disease remains controversial. This study tests the hypothesis that peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) at the distal radius and/or quantitative ultrasound (QUS) at the calcaneus can serve as replacement or improvement of current methodology (QCT and DXA) for predicting bone strength at the hip and other sites. In 126 human cadavers (age, 80.2 +/- 10.4 years), DXA of the femur, spine, and radius and pQCT of the radius were acquired with intact soft tissues. QCT (spine) and QUS (calcaneus) were performed ex situ in degassed specimens. Femoral failure loads were assessed in side impact and vertical loading. Failure loads of the thoracolumbar spine were determined at three levels in compression and those of the radius by simulating a fall. Site-specific DXA explained approximately 55% of the variability in femoral strength, whereas pQCT and QUS displayed a lower association (15-40%). QUS did not provide additional information on mechanical strength of the femur, spine, or radius. All techniques displayed similar capability in predicting a combined index of failure strength at these three sites, with only QUS exhibiting significantly lower associations than other methods. These experimental results suggest that clinical assessment of femoral fracture risk should preferably rely on femoral DXA, whereas DXA, QCT, and pQCT display similar capability of predicting a combined index of mechanical strength at the hip, spine, and radius.     

Device-specific thresholds to diagnose osteoporosis at the proximal femur: an approach to interpreting peripheral bone measurements in clinical practice

INTRODUCTION: A single T score criterion cannot be universally applied to different peripheral bone measurement devices, since measurements in an identical population result in a tenfold difference in the prevalence of osteoporosis. The use of peripheral devices is increasing in clinical practice, despite the difficulties in interpreting results. We propose the use of two thresholds, which have either 95% sensitivity or 95% specificity, to identify (1) individuals who require treatment or (2) individuals who require no treatment, both based on a peripheral measurement alone, or (3) individuals who require additional central densitometry measurements. METHODS: We recruited 500 postmenopausal women, 100 premenopausal women and 279 women with proximal femoral, vertebral, distal forearm or proximal humeral fractures. All subjects underwent dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements of the lumbar spine, total hip and distal forearm, quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the distal forearm and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the heel (four devices), finger (two devices), radius and metatarsal. We identified the threshold for each device that identified women without osteoporosis with the same sensitivity (upper threshold set at 95%) as total hip DXA and women with osteoporosis with the same specificity (lower threshold set at 95%) as total hip DXA. Individuals between the two thresholds required additional examination by central densitometry. RESULTS: The correlation between devices varied from 0.173 (QUS finger) to 0.686 (DXA forearm) compared with total hip DXA (P<0.0001). The area under the curve (AUC) between devices varied from 0.604 (QUS finger) to 0.896 (DXA forearm) compared with total hip DXA (P<0.0001). In a population-based cohort (prevalence of osteoporosis 9.8%) the threshold approach appropriately identified between 26% (QUS heel) and 68% (DXA forearm) of subjects in whom a treatment decision could be made without additional central DXA with 95% certainty. In a fracture cohort (prevalence of osteoporosis 36%) between 16% (QUS finger) and 37% (QCT forearm) of subjects were appropriately identified. CONCLUSION: The threshold approach to interpreting peripheral bone measurements enables a substantial number of individuals with either normal bone mineral density (BMD) or osteoporosis to be selected and treated appropriately.     

A prospective study of quantitative ultrasound in children and adolescents.

The accrual of optimal bone mass during childhood and adolescence is essential for the formation of a skeleton that will meet structural needs throughout life. Assessing bone health of children is becoming increasingly important in order to identify those who require interventions, and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) has appeal for these assessments. The purpose of this prospective study was to characterize changes in QUS values in 328 healthy children and adolescents over a 3-yr period. Measurements of QUS, height, weight, nutrient intake, fracture history, and Tanner stage were made at baseline and 3 yr later. Both females and males experienced significant increases in QUS values during the study. The rate of change of QUS peaked at an earlier age in females than in males, and maximum accumulation rates in both genders occurred at ages at which highest accumulation rates are seen with densitometry. Females exhibited higher QUS values than males during puberty, also similar to results for dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). This is the first report of prospective data of QUS in children and adolescents. Our findings that QUS values change during childhood and adolescence in a manner similar to DXA values, the "gold standard," provide support for the validity of using QUS to assess bone health in children and adolescents.     

Dual X-ray absorptiometry of hip, heel ultrasound, and densitometry of fingers can discriminate male patients with hip fracture from control subjects: a comparison of four different methods.

Few studies have examined different bone densitometry techniques to determine male hip fracture risk. We conducted a case-control study of 31 noninstitutionalized men, mean age 77 yr, with a first hip fracture and compared the results with 68 randomly selected age-matched control subjects. The methods used were dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the proximal femur, quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the heel and fingers, and radiographic absorptiometry of the fingers. Case patients had significantly lower values (4-17%; p < 0.01) for all methods. The odds ratios for every SD reduction in bone values were 4.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.3-9.9) for DXA of the femoral neck, 2.2 (95% CI: 1.2-3.9) for QUS of the heel, 2.0 (95% CI: 1.2-3.3) for QUS of the phalanges, and 3.1 (95% CI: 1.5-6.6) for radiographic absorptiometry of the phalanges. The results indicate a strong capability of DXA of the femoral neck to distinguish between men with a first hip fracture and control subjects. Furthermore, ultrasound of the heel and fingers as well as radiographic absorptiometry proved capable of discriminating men with hip fractures from control subjects.     

Densitometry in Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis

Bone density measurement is a critical tool in the management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP). This review addresses the utility of various measurement devices (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [DXA], quantitative ultrasound [QUS], quantitative CAT scanning [QCT]), their role in monitoring changes in bone mineral density (BMD), and the relationship of BMD and fracture risk in GIOP. A higher BMD threshold should be utilized for estimating fracture risk in patients on glucocorticoids.     

Prediction of bone strength of distal forearm using radius bone mineral density and phalangeal speed of sound

This investigation compares quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurement of the phalanges with peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurement of the forearm, to estimate the strength of the distal radius in 13 cadaveric forearms. The cadavers were scanned at the distal radius by pQCT and DXA for bone mineral density (BMD) and at the approximate phalanges by QUS for speed of sound (SOS). The distal radii were subjected to a simulated Colles fracture produced with a materials testing machine. The load at which the distal radius was fractured was considered as a representation of bone strength. The bone strength correlated significantly with SOS at different phalanges (r = 0.63-0.72), BMD at different regions of interest by DXA (r = 0.67-0.75), and cortical BMD at different sites by pQCT (r = 0.61-0.67). Standard stepwise regression analysis showed that adding phalangeal SOS into forearm densitometric variables significantly enhanced the statistical power for prediction of the strength of the distal radius. Our results suggest that, for assessment of site-specific distal forearm strength, QUS measurement of the phalanges is comparable to forearm densitometry. Phalangeal QUS may add clinical value if distal forearm strength has a high priority.     

The discriminative ability of peripheral and axial bone measurements to identify proximal femoral, vertebral, distal forearm and proximal humeral fractures: a case control study

Previous studies evaluating peripheral bone measurement devices have often used discontinued technologies, compared single devices, only evaluated a single fracture syndrome or failed to make a comparison with central densitometry, which is currently the gold standard for fracture discrimination. We have used a case control study to evaluate the ability of different peripheral and central bone techniques to discriminate between fracture cases and controls, determine the impact of different measurement sites, evaluate the role of measuring the cortical or trabecular envelopes using quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and determine the impact of using combinations of sites and techniques on fracture discrimination. We recruited postmenopausal women with proximal femoral (n=53), vertebral (n=73), distal forearm (n=78) or proximal humeral (n=75) fractures, and 500 population-based women (age 55-80 years). All subjects had measurements of the spine, total hip and distal forearm with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), distal forearm QCT and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the heel (four devices), finger (two devices), radius and metatarsal. The association of each device with fracture was expressed as the age-adjusted standardized odds ratios (sOR) per 1-SD decrease of population variance. The association of bone measurements with fracture was site-specific. We found the hip (sOR up to 3.40) and vertebral (sOR up to 4.67) fractures were more closely associated with central bone measurements than upper limb fractures (sOR 1.96 and 2.05). The performance of heel broadband ultrasound attenuation (sOR 2.09-2.41), heel speed of sound (sOR 1.79-2.28) and peripheral BMD (sOR 2.07 and 2.24) was comparable with total hip (sOR 2.46) and lumbar spine DXA (sOR 2.31) in discriminating all types of osteoporotic fracture. In general, measuring cortical or trabecular envelopes did not increase sOR. However, combining different measurement sites or technologies provided additional information, which was independent of total hip BMD. The ability of different bone measurements to discriminate between fracture cases and controls is device- and site-specific, with additional information obtained by combining measurement sites and technologies.     

Relationship between bone quantitative ultrasound and fractures: a meta-analysis.

The relationship between bone QUS and fracture risk was estimated in a systematic review of data from 14 prospective studies of 47,300 individuals and 2350 incident fractures. In older women, low QUS values were associated with overall fracture risk, low-trauma fractures, and with hip, forearm, and humerus fractures separately. INTRODUCTION: Bone quantitative ultrasound (QUS) has emerged as a promising technique to evaluate bone status. The aim of this study was to determine the association between measurements of QUS with the risk of fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies published between 1985 and June 2005 with a baseline measurement of QUS and subsequent follow-up for fractures was carried out. Fourteen separate study populations, consisting of about 47,300 individuals (85.4% women), with about 124,000 person-years of observation and over 2350 fractures, including 653 hip, 529 forearm, and 386 humeral fractures, were analyzed. The main outcome measure was the estimated relative risk of fracture for a decrease in bone QUS parameters of 1 SD below sex- and age-adjusted mean in women. RESULTS: Eleven studies evaluated QUS at the heel, with patella and phalanx (two studies each) and distal radius (one study) being scarcely used. There was not significant heterogeneity among the studies included in the review. Relative risk estimates (95% CI) for overall fractures were 1.55 (1.35-1.78) for each SD decrease in broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), 1.63 (1.37-1.93) for speed of sound (SOS), and 1.74 (1.39-2.17) for QUS index/stiffness index (QUI/SI). Risk estimates were similar or slightly higher for hip fractures and low-energy trauma fractures. Humeral and forearm/wrist fractures were also related with lower QUS values. CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of bone QUS are significantly associated with nonspinal fracture risk in older women in a similar degree to DXA. QUS may be a valid alternative to evaluate fracture risk in situations where DXA is not accessible.     

Palangeal Quantitative Ultrasound,Phalangeal Morphometric Variables,and Vertebral Fracture Discrimination

The aim of this study was to evaluate the association among phalangeal morphometric parameters, amplitude-dependent speed of sound (AD-SOS), ultrasound bone profile index (UBPI), and spinal bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture status. One hundred women (controls, mean age 53 +/- 12 years) and 40 osteoporotic women (mean age 59 +/- 7 years) with atraumatic fractures, diagnosed by spinal radiographs, were investigated. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) assessment was performed using the DBM Sonic 1200. Morphological properties of the phalanges were measured from a digitized X-ray image of the hand acquired using industrial film. Spinal BMD was assessed by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative computed tomography (QCT). An increase in medullary canal width and a decrease in cortical thickness with aging were observed from the morphometric analysis of the hand radiographs. This phenomenon can be attributed mainly to endosteal resorption. QUS measurements at the phalanges were not significantly related to finger thickness (r <0.20, n.s.). They were significantly correlated to medullary canal ratio (r = -0.57, P <0.0001, for AD-SOS and r = -0.64, P <0.0001, for UBPI) and to cortical thickness (r = +0.52, P <0.0001 for AD-SOS and r = +0.59, P <0.0001 for UBPI). In the discrimination analysis between nonfractured and atraumatic vertebral fracture subjects we found that cortical thickness at the level of the phalanges were similar to lumbar spine BMD. The age and BMI-adjusted odds ratio ranged from 2.0 to 3.1 for QUS, 4.28 for BMD by QCT, 4.1 for BMD by DXA, and 4.1 for cortical thickness. We conclude from these data that phalangeal QUS is related to cortical thickness, which in turn is influenced by endosteal bone resorption occurring in association with spinal osteoporosis.     

Ability of peripheral bone assessments to predict areal bone mineral density at hip in community-dwelling elderly men.

We present cross-sectional data on bone mineral density (BMD) and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) indices in an ambulatory elderly male population (n = 235). Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the proximal femur was considered the reference assessment site and was compared with DXA at the forearm and heel and to QUS at the heel and midtibia. Correlations and weighted kappa analysis indicate an only moderate concordance of absolute values between peripheral bone assessment and total hip DXA (weighted kappas: 0.31-0.45). Discrepancies are even more important when T-scores and prevalence rates of osteoporosis are considered, owing to factors related to the reference populations used. Predictive value of peripheral measurements for osteoporosis diagnosed on the basis of hip BMD by DXA, as assessed by receiver operator characteristic analysis, was moderate and comparable for all peripheral measurements (area under the curve: 0.708-0.870), with the exception of a clearly lower predictive value for QUS at the tibia. Discrimination of male subjects with a history of at least one fragility fracture was significant for DXA at the proximal femur and QUS at the heel. It is concluded that peripheral measurements cannot be used as a substitute for hip DXA. However, they might be useful to guide patient referral for central DXA.     

Imaging of metabolic bone diseases

Osteoporosis, a chronic progressive disease, is the most common metabolic bone disease and can affect almost the entire skeleton. Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disease characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue, with a consequent increase in bone fragility. The disease often does not become clinically apparent until a fracture occurs. However, the sensitivity, examination time, cost, and radiation exposure of the different imaging techniques differ greatly. Imaging options include conventional x-ray images, US, QUS, SPA, DPA, quantitative CT (QCT), densitometry, dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), MRI, QMR, SPECT and bone scanning.     

Quantitative Ultrasound in Adults with Cystic Fibrosis: Correlation with Bone Mineral Density and Risk of Vertebral Fractures

In several conditions, including cystic fibrosis (CF) and corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis, bone mineral density (BMD) measurements provide a modest prediction of fracture risk. We investigated in adult CF patients whether quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parameters were able to discriminate between patients with and without prevalent vertebral fractures. One hundred seventy-two adults with CF, 91 men and 81 women, often on chronic oral or inhaled corticosteroid therapy, were studied. BMD at the lumbar spine, proximal femur, and total body were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). QUS parameters were assessed by Achilles Express at the calcaneus and by the DBM Sonic 1200 at the phalanges. All bone measurements by DXA and QUS were significantly correlated with each other, with the exception of phalangeal amplitude-dependent speed of sound versus spine BMD. The mean T-score values in CF patients with and without prevalent vertebral fractures were similar for all DXA measurements and for stiffness index. A significant difference between the two groups was observed only for phalangeal ultrasound bone profile index (UBPI) values (relative risk = 1.25, 95% confidence interval 1.05–1.49 for each decrease in T score), and this difference was maintained after adjusting the values for age, body weight, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, gender, and corticosteroid use. In conclusion, only a phalangeal QUS parameter (UBPI), in contrast with calcaneus QUS or DXA measurements, was able to discriminate CF patients with from those without vertebral fractures, possibly as a result of qualitative alterations of bone tissue independent of BMD.     

Association of five quantitative ultrasound devices and bone densitometry with osteoporotic vertebral fractures in a population-based sample: the OPUS Study.

We compared the performance of five QUS devices with DXA in a population-based sample of 2837 women. All QUS approaches discriminated women with and without osteoporotic vertebral fractures. QUS of the calcaneus performed as well as central DXA. INTRODUCTION: Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) methods have found widespread use for the assessment of bone status in osteoporosis, but their optimal use remains to be established. To determine QUS performance for current devices in direct comparison with central DXA, we initiated a large population-based investigation, the Osteoporosis and Ultrasound Study (OPUS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 463 women 20-39 years of age and 2374 women 55-79 years of age were measured on five different QUS devices along with DXA of the spine and the proximal femur. Their vertebral fracture status was evaluated radiographically. The association of QUS and DXA with vertebral fracture status was evaluated using logistic regression. RESULTS: All QUS approaches tested discriminated women with and without osteoporotic vertebral fractures (20% height reduction), with age-adjusted standardized odds ratios ranging 1.2-1.3 for amplitude-dependent speed of sound (AD-SOS) at the finger phalanges, 1.2-1.4 for broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) at the calcaneus, and 1.4-1.5 for speed of sound (SOS) at the calcaneus, 1.4-1.6 for DXA of the total femur, and 1.5-1.6 for DXA at the spine. For more severe fractures (40% height reduction), age-adjusted standardized odds ratios increased to up to 1.9 for DXA of the spine and 2.3 for SOS of the calcaneus. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, all five QUS devices tested showed significant age-adjusted differences between subjects with and without vertebral fracture. When selecting the strongest variable, QUS of the calcaneus worked as well as central DXA for identification of women at high risk for prevalent osteoporotic vertebral fractures. QUS-based case-finding strategies would allow halving the number of radiographs in high-risk populations, and this strategy works increasingly well for women with more severe vertebral fractures. It is likely that the good performance of QUS was in part achieved by rigorous quality assurance measures that should also be used in clinical practice.     

DXA、QCT和SPA方法测量47例绝经后妇女骨质疏松症的比较

以骨密度测量应用最广的３种方法（ＤＸＡ─双能ｘ线吸收法，ＱＣＴ─定量ＣＴ法和ＳＰＡ─单光子吸收法）测量绝经后妇女的骨矿密度，比较其测量值、诊断结果和相关关系。首先用ＳＰＡ法测量绝经后妇女１８１例，诊断骨质疏松（ＯＰ）４７例。三种方法测量骨矿密度的均值分别低于峰值骨量的Ｍ─２ｓ的９％、２１．４％和２１％，且ＤＸＡ和ＱＣＴ两种方法测量的均值都在骨折阈值范围内。ＤＸＡ和ＱＣＴ诊断４７例ＯＰ之间无显著性差异，当排除椎骨骨质增生后的ｘ２＝０．２３７，且ＤＸＡ和ＱＣＴ测量值之间为正相关，ｒ＝０．７９９，而ＤＸＡ、ＱＣＴ和ＳＰＡ之间的相关系数，ｒ＝０．１８５和０．２８５，ＤＸＡ诊断ＯＰ的敏感性为８６．６％，特异性为７０％。     

A comparison of fracture discrimination using calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and dual X-ray absorptiometry in women with a history of fracture at sites other than the spine and hip

The aim of this study was to determine whether calcaneal quantitative ultrasound can discriminate between women with and those without fragility fracture at (1) the wrist or (2) at sites other than the spine, hip, or forearm, as well as axial DXA measurements of BMD can. The study population consisted of 342 postmenopausal Caucasian women who were placed into one of three groups: (1) healthy women with no clinical risk factors for osteoporosis (n = 240); (2) women with a history of atraumatic fracture at the wrist (n = 50); (3) women with a history of atraumatic fracture at a skeletal site other than the spine, hip, or wrist (n = 52). Subjects had DXA measurements of the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), and total hip (THIP), and calcaneal broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS) measurements on the Hologic Sahara (s) and Osteometer DTUone (d). Z-scores were calculated using the mean and SD obtained from the healthy postmenopausal group. All the BMD and QUS variables were significantly reduced in women reporting a fracture of the wrist or at a site other than the spine, hip, or forearm. When the group of women with a history of wrist fracture were compared with the postmenopausal controls, age-adjusted logistic regression yielded odds ratios associated with a 1 SD decrease, that were significant for both BMD and QUS, averaging 2.2. The AUC values ranged from 0.65 for FN BMD to 0.75 for BUAd. BMD and QUS measurements were also significantly reduced in women reporting a skeletal fracture at a site other than the spine, hip, or wrist, and odds ratios for BMD and QUS were significant, averaging 1.7. BMD and QUS showed similar fracture discriminatory abilities that were not significantly different from one another. In conclusion, calcaneal QUS can discriminate between women with and those without fracture at the wrist or at sites other than the spine, hip, or forearm as well as axial DXA measurements of BMD can.     

Evaluation of quantitative ultrasound and dual X-Ray absorptiometry measurements in women with and without fractures.

Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is considered a gold standard for bone measurements in the assessment of osteoporosis. Other techniques such as quantitative ultrasound (QUS) are promising to detect patients with osteoporosis-related fractures and to predict fracture risk. In this cross-sectional retrospective study, we analyzed the behavior of QUS and DXA measurements alone and in combination with regard to the presence of fractures in 320 women, 147 with nontraumatic fractures. Speed of sound (SOS), broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), and a third parameter derived from SOS and BUA called stiffness were measured at the calcaneus using an Achilles device (Lunar, Madison, WI). Lumbar (BMDL) and hip (BMDH( bone mineral density were measured by DXA (Hologic QDR 1000, Waltham, MA). Mean SOS, BUA, stiffness, and BMDL and BMDH were significantly lower in women with fractures compared with women without fractures. Logistic regression adjusted for age identified stiffness as the parameter most strongly associated with the presence of fracture: its sensitivity was 54% and specificity 70%. Hip BMD was second, with a sensitivity of 54% and a specificity of 69%. Combining QUS and DXA measurements did not improve the specificity nor the sensitivity. There was no difference in the odds ratios with regard to the technique that was chosen for bone assessment. In conclusion, these results suggest that low QUS measurements are associated with the presence of fractures in a way similar to DXA. In our study, the combination of QUS and DXA did not improve the discrimination of women with fractures.     

Device-specific weighted T-score for two quantitative ultrasounds: operational propositions for the management of osteoporosis for 65 years and older women in Switzerland

The World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for the diagnosis of osteoporosis are mainly applicable for dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements at the spine and hip levels. There is a growing demand for cheaper devices, free of ionizing radiation such as promising quantitative ultrasound (QUS). In common with many other countries, QUS measurements are increasingly used in Switzerland without adequate clinical guidelines. The T-score approach developed for DXA cannot be applied to QUS, although well-conducted prospective studies have shown that ultrasound could be a valuable predictor of fracture risk. As a consequence, an expert committee named the Swiss Quality Assurance Project (SQAP, for which the main mission is the establishment of quality assurance procedures for DXA and QUS in Switzerland) was mandated by the Swiss Association Against Osteoporosis (ASCO) in 2000 to propose operational clinical recommendations for the use of QUS in the management of osteoporosis for two QUS devices sold in Switzerland. Device-specific weighted "T-score" based on the risk of osteoporotic hip fractures as well as on the prediction of DXA osteoporosis at the hip, according to the WHO definition of osteoporosis, were calculated for the Achilles (Lunar, General Electric, Madison, Wis.) and Sahara (Hologic, Waltham, Mass.) ultrasound devices. Several studies (totaling a few thousand subjects) were used to calculate age-adjusted odd ratios (OR) and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) for the prediction of osteoporotic fracture (taking into account a weighting score depending on the design of the study involved in the calculation). The ORs were 2.4 (1.9-3.2) and AUC 0.72 (0.66-0.77), respectively, for the Achilles, and 2.3 (1.7-3.1) and 0.75 (0.68-0.82), respectively, for the Sahara device. To translate risk estimates into thresholds for clinical application, 90% sensitivity was used to define low fracture and low osteoporosis risk, and a specificity of 80% was used to define subjects as being at high risk of fracture or having osteoporosis at the hip. From the combination of the fracture model with the hip DXA osteoporotic model, we found a T-score threshold of -1.2 and -2.5 for the stiffness (Achilles) determining, respectively, the low- and high-risk subjects. Similarly, we found a T-score at -1.0 and -2.2 for the QUI index (Sahara). Then a screening strategy combining QUS, DXA, and clinical factors for the identification of women needing treatment was proposed. The application of this approach will help to minimize the inappropriate use of QUS from which the whole field currently suffers.     

Assessment of a New Quantitative Ultrasound Calcaneus Measurement: Precision and Discrimination of Hip Fractures in Elderly Women Compared with Dual X-ray Absorptiometry

The incidence of osteoporotic hip fracture increases in postmenopausal women with low hip bone mineral density (BMD). Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the most commonly used technique for the assessment of bone status and provides good measurement precision. However, DXA affords little information about bone architecture. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) systems have been developed to evaluate bone status for assessment of fracture risk. Our study was designed to assess a new QUS system from Hologic, the Sahara; to compare it with a previous model, the Walker-Sonix UBA 575+; and to investigate whether it is able to discriminate between women with and without fracture. Using both ultrasound devices, the measurements were performed at the heels of 33 postmenopausal women who had recently sustained hip fracture. A control group of 35 age-matched postmenopausal women was recruited for comparison. The total, neck and trochanter femoral BMD values were assessed using DXA for both groups. QUS and DXA measurements were significantly lower in fractured patients (p<0.005) than in the control group. The short-term, mid-term and standardized short-term precisions were used to evaluate the reproducibility of the two QUS systems. The Sahara showed a better standardized coefficient of variation for broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) than did the UBA 575+ (p<0.001). The correlation of BUA and speed of sound (SOS) between the two QUS devices was highly significant, with an r value of 0.92 for BUA and 0.91 for SOS. However, the correlation between DXA and ultrasound parameters ranged from 0.28 to 0.44. We found that ultrasound measurements at the heel were significant discriminators of hip fractures with odds ratios (OR) ranging from 2.7 to 3.2. Even after adjusting the logistic regressions for total, neck or trochanter femoral BMD, QUS variables were still significant independent discriminators of hip fracture. The areas under the ROC curves of each ultrasound parameter ranged from 0.75 to 0.78, and compared very well with femoral neck BMD (p>0.05). In conclusion, our study indicated that the calcaneal QUS variables, as measured by the Sahara system can discriminate hip fracture patients equally as well as hip DXA. Received: 29 October 1999 / Accepted: 7 September 1999     

Quantitative ultrasound of the heel: Correlation with densitometric measurements at different skeletal sites

To assess the utility of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the heel for osteoporosis screening, we studied a group of 170 early postmenopausal women using both QUS of the heel and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the spine, hip, forearm, and whole body. On the basis of the linear regression results between QUS and DXA, a 95% bone mineral density (BMD) estimate confidence range was defined. Correlation coefficients between the QUS measurements and DXA ranged from 0.26 to 0.63. The confidence ranges for the estimated BMD based on a QUS measurement of the heel were large, such that an estimation of skeletal BMD at any of the DXA sites measured was not possible. For example, an estimate of the normative anteroposterior spine BMD (i.e. theT-score or theZ-score) based on a calcaneal ultrasound reading would have an error of ±1.9 standard deviations. Results for predicting the normative BMD of the other DXA regions were similar, with expected errors ranging from ±1.4 to ±2.0 standard deviations. We therefore conclude that QUS is not suited for the screening of early postmenopausal women for low axial or peripheral BMD. However, QUS may have a role as an independent predictor of fracture by measuring skeletal properties in addition to bone density.