Comparison of the diagnostic value of the visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and Pap smear in cervical cancer screening

ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare the diagnostic value of VIA with Pap smear in screening for cervical cancer.Materials and methodsIn this cross-sectional study, 440 women who had eligibility criteria, in Kashan city were assessed. All women underwent Pap smear test and then a visual inspection with acetic acid and colposcopy-biopsy (Gold Standard). Then, the diagnostic value indices including the specificity, sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values for the results of VIA and Pap smear were analyzed by SPSS V16 software.ResultsFinding showed that 29.9% of women had abnormal Pap smear. The false positive rate of Pap smear was 40.2%, and its false negative rate was 37.4%. For VIA, the false positive and false negative rates were 21.2% and 4.6%. The sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV of Pap smear was 29.7%, 85.5%, 59.8%, 62.6%, and these values for VIA was 94.6%, 81.6%, 78.8%, 95.4% respectively. Combination of Pap smear and VIA showed the sensitivity of 97.3% and 100% in low grade and high grade cervical lesions.ConclusionVIA has a higher sensitivity than Pap smear in detection of low and high grade cervical lesions, however, its specificity is less than Pap smears. Therefore it is recommended to use of VIA along with Pap smear to reach a higher sensitivity.     

Visual inspection with acetic acid and cytology as screening methods for cervical lesions in Cameroon.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) as a screening method for cervical lesions. METHODS: VIA and cytological smears were carried out on the cervices of non-pregnant women aged 30-60 years with no previous history of cervical cancer. Cervices with aceto white lesions or positive Pap smears, and one in ten negative cervices (control), were biopsied. RESULTS: 5010 women were enrolled, 4813 (96.1%) were screened. 4767 (99.%) had adequate cytology smears. 574 (11.9%) had colposcopy. 1743 biopsies were obtained of which 528 were controls. The sensitivity of VIA was 70.4% versus 47.7% for Pap smear. VIA specificity was 77.6% versus 94.2% for Pap smear; PPV for VIA was 44.0% versus 67.2% for Pap smear; and NPV for VIA was 91.3% versus 87.8% for Pap smear. CONCLUSIONS: VIA has acceptable test qualities and may in low resource settings be implemented as a large scale screening method.     

Comparison of pap smear, visual inspection with acetic acid, human papillomavirus DNA-PCR testing and cervicography.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the test qualities of four screening methods to detect cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia in an urban African setting. METHOD: Six hundred fifty-three women, attending a family planning clinic in Nairobi (Kenya), underwent four concurrent screening methods: pap smear, visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), PCR for high risk human papillomavirus (HR HPV) and cervicography. The presence of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN) was verified by colposcopy or biopsy. RESULT: Sensitivity (for CIN2 or higher) and specificity (to exclude any CIN or cancer) were 83.3% (95% CI [73.6, 93.0]) and 94.6% (95% CI [92.6, 96.5]), respectively, for pap smear; 73.3% (95% CI [61.8, 84.9]) and 80.0% (95% CI [76.6, 83.4]) for VIA; 94.4% (95% CI [84.6, 98.8]) and 73.9% (95% CI [69.7, 78.2]) for HR HPV; and 72.3% (95% CI [59.1, 85.6]) and 93.2% (95% CI [90.8, 95.7]) for cervicography. CONCLUSION: The pap smear had the highest specificity (94.6%) and HPV testing the highest sensitivity (94.4%). The visual methods, VIA and cervicography, were similar and showed an accuracy in between the former two tests.     

Can visual inspection with acetic acid be used as an alternative to Pap smear in screening cervical cancer?

ObjectiveTo evaluate the value of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) in screening cervical cancer in comparison to Pap smear.Material and methods200 women attending the obstetric and gynecology Department in Zagazig University hospital from December 2011 to November 2012 were included. They were screened using Pap smear and VIA. Colposcopy was done for all women. Positive cases on any screening test were subjected to cervical biopsy.ResultsAcetic acid (VIA) was positive in 24/200 (12%) patients and Pap smear was abnormal in 8 (4%). There were 5 LSIL, 2 HSIL and one with cells suspicious of malignancy. Colposcopy was recorded abnormal in 35 cases (17.5) .18 cases (51.4%) had a Reid score of 0–2 and considered negative .17 cases (48.6%) had a positive colposcopy (Reid 3–8). Cervical biopsy was done on all 35 cases. 44% biopsies were positive and 56% were negative .15 positive biopsies incorporated 11 mild dysplasia, 2 moderate dysplasia, 1 sever dysplasia and one carcinoma in situ. The Pap smear had a sensitivity of 50.1%, specificity of 93.1%, and positive predictive value of 89.3% and negative predictive value of 65.6%. VIA had a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 37%, and positive predictive value of 52% and negative predictive value of 81%.ConclusionVIA a good screening, simple test, has low cost and high sensitivity in comparison to Pap smear. So, it can be used as alternative screening modality for cervical cancer in low resource locations.     

Performance of visual inspection with acetic acid for cervical cancer screening: a qualitative summary of evidence to date

Developing countries often lack the necessary resources to use the Papanicolaou (Pap) smear as a screening tool for cervical abnormalities. Because the burden of cervical cancer is highest in such low-resource settings, alternative techniques have been sought. Recently, interest in visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) has increased. Numerous studies have been conducted on its accuracy and its ability to detect cervical lesions when compared with other techniques, both conventional and nonconventional. This review summarizes key findings from the literature to provide researchers and policymakers with an up-to-date summary on VIA. PubMed was used to identify relevant journal articles published between 1982 and 2002. Key words were cervical cancer screening, visual inspection, VIA (visual inspection with acetic acid), DVI (direct visual inspection), AAT (acetic acid test), and cervicoscopy. Studies were eligible for review only if they involved analysis of primary VIA data (ie, not review articles); studies involving magnification devices were excluded. Fifteen studies were reviewed in total; key results were extracted and a summary analysis was performed for sensitivity and specificity parameters. When reported, sensitivity ranged between 66% and 96% and specificity between 64% and 98%. Authors comparing VIA with cytology noted that the overall usefulness of VIA compares favorably with that of the Pap test. The reported findings reviewed here suggest that VIA has the potential to be a cervical cancer screening tool, especially in low resource settings. TARGET AUDIENCE: Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians. LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After completion of this article, the reader will be able to describe how visual inspection of the cervix for cervical cancer screening (VIA) is performed, to summarize the current literature on VIA, and to list potential advantages of VIA.     

Aided visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and HPV detection as optional screening tools for cervical cancer and its precursor lesions

PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION: To assess the contribution of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and Hybrid Capture II (HCII) as adjunct methods to the Pap test in detecting cervical neoplasia. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study with 809 women who consecutively attended gynecological consultations at Campinas University, Brazil, from January 2002 to July 2003. Pap test, HCII, VIA, and colposcopy were offered to all patients. Performance of tests (alone or in combination) in detecting histologically confirmed lesions was evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 40 patients with CIN, 69% had CIN1, 26% CIN2 or CIN3 and one patient had invasive carcinoma. VIA had the best performance in detecting CIN, yielding 72% sensitivity and 91% specificity. Considering only CIN2 or worse as significant lesions, HCII had the best sensitivity (73%), while the Pap test was the most specific (93%). Combining the three exams, 92% of the CIN1 or worse were detected. When CIN1 was excluded from the analysis, Pap smear plus HCII delivered 82% sensitivity and 79% specificity. However, this combination yielded a very low (5%) PPV. CONCLUSION: VIA and HCII contributed to the screening of cervical neoplasia in a group of Brazilian women, but the cost-effectiveness of conjoint screening modalities is still debatable.     

Visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid for cervical intraepithelial lesions.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (VIA) for screening cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. METHODS: In this prospective study, 400 women were screened using the Papanicolaou (PAP) smear, VIA and colposcopy. Those who had positive results with any of the screening methods underwent large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). The sensitivity and specificity of each of the screening methods was analyzed. RESULTS: The sensitivity of VIA (96.7%) was much higher than that of the Pap smear (50%), and almost as high as that of colposcopy (100%). The specificity of VIA (36.4%) was lower than that of the Pap smear (97%) and colposcopy (96.9%), resulting in high false-positive rates for VIA. Two cases of endocervical lesions were missed with VIA. CONCLUSION: Visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid is very sensitive for ectocervical lesions. The advantages of the VIA method are its low cost and ease of use (it can be used by paramedical workers), its high sensitivity and its immediate results (it is possible to "see and treat" at the first visit). Its main limitation is a high rate of false-positive results, which may lead to overtreatment if a "see and treat" policy is applied.     

内蒙古少数民族地区宫颈癌的筛查方法研究

目的探讨内蒙古少数民族聚居区宫颈癌及癌前病变适宜的筛查方法。方法2009年4月-8月对内蒙古自治区鄂尔多斯、兴安盟、通辽三个地区的2958名年龄30～59岁的已婚妇女进行了宫颈癌筛查。取宫颈脱落细胞,做人乳头瘤病毒（HPV-HC2）检测;同时用醋酸着色及碘着色（VIA/VILI）肉眼观察的方法进行筛查。对HPV-HC2阳性或VIA/VILI肉眼观察异常或两者均异常者,行阴道镜检查,在可疑处取宫颈组织活检,必要时行颈管诊刮术（ECC）;送组织病理学检查确诊。结果内蒙古鄂尔多斯、通辽、兴安盟三地区HPV总感染率为17.36%,中度及以上宫颈上皮内瘤样病变（≥CIN2）和宫颈癌的检出率为0.9%;应用HPV-HC2筛出阳性者最后确诊≥CIN2者27例,而用VIA/VILI仅确诊13例,漏诊14例。结论HPV检测结合醋酸、碘肉眼观察是宫颈癌筛查的有效方法。在内蒙等经济发展不均衡地区,可尝试采用HPV检测进行初筛,对HPV阳性患者用VIA＋VILI或者细胞学筛查的方法进行分流的筛查策略,降低漏诊率,也相对降低HPV阳性患者阴道镜的转诊率。     

Diagnosing human papillomavirus of the female lower genital tract: failure of the Pap smear as a sole screening test

Of 197 patients referred for colposcopy who underwent repeat Pap smears and colposcopic biopsies (when indicated), histologic evidence of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection involving the endocervix, cervix, or vagina or all three sites was documented in 109 biopsies. Sixty-six (61%) had normal Pap smears at the time of colposcopy. Despite a specificity of 92% for detecting HPV, the Pap smear demonstrated a low sensitivity (39%), with a positive and negative predictive test value of 88% and 50%, respectively. In patients with biopsies revealing HPV infection without associated dysplasia, false negative Pap smears were found most often in women with strictly vaginal HPV (74%) (P less than 0.05), followed by those with coexistent cervical and vaginal HPV (65%), and then by those with solely cervical HPV (51%). We question the use of the Pap smear for the detection of lower genital tract HPV, particularly in patients with only vaginal involvement, especially when the smear is repeated at the time of colposcopy. Benefits and disadvantages of other screening tests for HPV are discussed.     

Trends in cervical cancer screening in developing countries

Developing countries suffer the highest burden of cervical cancers but have the lowest resources. Effective cervical cytology screening programme, along with a network of diagnostic and therapeutic colposcopy centres, like developed countries, is almost impossible to be reproduced in developing countries. Visual inspection methods [e.g., Visual inspection with Lugol’s iodine (VILI) and Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA)] which are cheaper, require less expertise and have the advantage of possible treatment in one setting have been shown to be effective alternatives. The sensitivity to detect CIN2+, by VIA and VILI, have been shown to be 80% and 91% respectively, with a specificity rate of 92% and 85% respectively. Screening by human papillomavirus (HPV) testing has high sensitivity (96.4%) but low specificity (94.1%) to detect CIN2+, when compared to Pap Smear (sensitivity, 55.4% and specificity, 96.8%). A single lifetime HPV testing in a large unscreened population has been shown to significantly reduce cervical cancer incidence and mortality when compared to cervical cytology, VIA or no screening. HPV testing of self-collected vaginal specimens also helps to overcome religious and socio-cultural barriers towards pelvic examination amongst women in developing countries. Current HPV testing methods are expensive, skill/infrastructure demanding and takes time to produce results. A cheaper HPV test, called careHPV™, which is able to provide results within 2.5 h and requires minimal skill/infrastructure to operate, was designed for use in developing countries. One stop screen and treat facilities using VIA or rapid HPV testing, and cryotherapy, can overcome non-compliance to follow-up which is a major issue in developing countries. Cure rates of 81.4% for CIN1, 71.4% for CIN2 and 68.0% for CIN3 at 6 mo after treatment have been reported. Incorporating telemedicine with cervicography of VIA or VILI or even telecolposcopy, has great potential in cervical cancer screening, especially in countries with vast geographical areas.     

Efficacy of visual inspection of the cervix using acetic acid in cervical cancer screening: a comparison with cervical cytology.

Screening programmes for the early detection of premalignant lesions of the cervix are expensive and technically difficult, especially in resource-challenged settings. There is a need for cheaper and equally effective alternative screening methods. This study compared the efficacy of visual inspection of the cervix using acetic acid (VIA) with the Pap smear method. A total of 186 subjects had a Pap smear followed by visual inspection of the cervix using 3 - 5% acetic acid with biopsies taken from suspicious acetowhite positive lesions. Cases of abnormal cytology were recalled for biopsies. A total of 150 subjects were negative for both tests; 30 (16.2%) were positive for VIA, while six were positive for both VIA and Pap smear. VIA detected one lesion missed by Pap smear on biopsy. The sensitivity of VIA was 100%, while that of Pap smear was 85.7%. The negative predictive value of VIA was 100%, while the positive predictive value was 20%. The sensitivity of VIA equals the reported rates for Pap smear. VIA is proposed as a credible alternative to Pap smear in resource-challenged settings.     

Managing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in Papanicolaou smears

OBJECTIVE: To assess strategies using repeated conventional Pap smear and human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing, alone or in combination, for identifying women with concomitant cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and 3 (CIN 2/3) in women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) in their Pap smears. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 360 women cytologically diagnosed with ASCUS were referred for colposcopy and underwent a repeat Pap smear, a biopsy when necessary and HPV testing using three different modes of detection of high-oncogenic-risk HPV types: 1, first-generation Hybrid Capture test (HC-1) (Digene Diagnostics, Gaithersburg, Maryland); 2, second-generation Hybrid Capture test (HC-2); and 3, polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RESULTS: Nineteen patients (5.3%) had histologic CIN 2/3. The sensitivity and specificity of the repeat Pap smear alone for the detection of CIN 2/3 were 73.7% and 62.9%, respectively, when referring all women with a repeat Pap smear using an ASCUS-positive threshold. The proportion of women referred for colposcopy was 39.0%. When HPV testing for high risk was used for identification of women with histologic CIN 2/3, sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 68.4% and 85.9% for HC-1, 89.5% and 73.9% for HC-2 and 89.5% and 59.0% for PCR. The rate of referral for colposcopy of these three modes of HPV testing was 16.9%, 29.4% and 44.0%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for identification of women with concomitant CIN 2/3 using a combination of repeat cytology showing a low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and/or a test positive for high-oncogenic-risk HPV group were, respectively, 94.7% and 73.2% when used in combination with HC-2. The referral rate of women for colposcopy of this combined strategy was 30.4%. CONCLUSION: As compared to the strategy using abnormal repeat Pap smear alone, those using high-risk HPV testing with Hybrid Capture showed statistically significantly higher specificities and lower proportions of women with ASCUS referred for colposcopy. In particular, a promising strategy would be to refer for colposcopy only women with repeat Pap smears showing squamous intraepithelial lesion and/or those positive for high-risk HPV detected by Hybrid Capture testing.     

Shanxi Province Cervical Cancer Screening Study: a cross-sectional comparative trial of multiple techniques to detect cervical neoplasia

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to design a cervical cancer screening algorithm for the developing world that is highly sensitive for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) II, III, and cancer and highly specific for CIN II and III, making it possible to ablate the transformation zone without histologic confirmation. METHODS: In rural Shanxi Province, China, we examined 1997 women ages 35-45. Each subject underwent a self-test for intermediate and high-risk HPV (by HC-II assay), fluorescence spectroscopy, a liquid-based Pap (read manually and by computer and used as a direct test for HPV), a visual inspection (VIA) diagnosis, and colposcopy with multiple cervical biopsies. RESULTS: Mean age was 39.1 +/- 3.16 years, mean number of births was 2.6 +/- 0.93. Based on tests administered, 4.3% subjects had > or =CIN II. All subjects with > or =CIN II had either a ThinPrep Pap (> or =ASCUS) or a positive HPV direct test. The sensitivity and specificity for the detection of > or =CIN II were, respectively, 83 and 86% for the HPV self-test, 95 and 85% for the HPV direct test, 94 and 78% for the ThinPrep Pap (> or =ASCUS), 77 and 98% for the ThinPrep Pap (> or =HGSIL), 94 and 9% for fluorescence spectroscopy, 71 and 74% for VIA, and 81 and 77% for colposcopy. CONCLUSION: Based on these data and the existing healthcare infrastructure in China, we believe that further refinement of primary HPV screening using centralized labs is indicated. Self-testing in the local villages may be effective with improvements in the devices and techniques.     

Risk factors as the basis for triage in low-resource cervical cancer screening programs.

OBJECTIVES: Several studies have shown impressive sensitivity and specificity of visual inspection using acetic acid wash (VIA) in detecting cervical dysplasia. This study examines how risk-factor based triage, using clinical history-taking to limit the testing to those at highest risk of disease, improves the clinical utility of VIA. METHODS: The study population included 2206 woman aged 25-56 from peri-urban primary care clinics in Zimbabwe. Three risk factors variables [age, lifetime number of sexual partners and history of a sexually transmitted infection (STI)] were selected as the basis for computer-simulated patient triage. Criteria for selecting risk factors were biological relevance, programmatic feasibility, historical evidence in the scientific literature as a risk factor for cervical cancer and a significant (P<0.05) predictor of dysplasia in this study population. Predictive values for VIA were calculated on subgroups of women with combinations of the three risk factors and then compared with the predictive value of VIA calculated on the full study population. RESULTS: The positive predictive value (PPV) among women with all three risk factors (30.2%) was 1.6 times higher than that of all study women and 4.5 times higher than women with none of the three risk factors (4.1%). Additionally, the PPV was slightly (30%) higher than that obtained from computer-simulated serial testing using VIA as the primary test followed by HPV testing (27.4%). CONCLUSION: Clinical history-taking could provide the basis for patient triage to increase the clinical utility of VIA. Such an approach could also serve to prioritize who gets tested first in low-resource countries with high disease prevalence that are struggling to strengthen national cervical cancer prevention programs.     

Visual inspection with acetic acid test qualities in a secondary setting

AIM: To evaluate the visual inspection using acetic acid (VIA) test qualities in a secondary (follow-up) setting, 1 year after cryotherapy treatment performed as part of the Safety, Acceptability and Feasibility demonstration project designed to evaluate the safety, acceptability and feasibility of VIA. An immediate offer of cryotherapy was made to those who test positive and are eligible for treatment. METHODS: At 1 year after cryotherapy, 648 women received both a secondary (follow-up) VIA test by nurse-providers, and colposcopy with biopsy, if indicated, by trained physician colposcopists at a referral hospital. All pathologic specimens were sent for examination by a single pathologist. RESULTS: VIA nurse-providers assessed 42 of the 648 women (6.5%) referred as abnormal (i.e. they tested positive or were suspected of having cancer). Among the 42, the final colposcopic-based diagnosis was HSIL or higher in three cases (7.1%), of which two were HSIL and one was adenocarcinoma. Of the 606 VIA negative women, the colposcopic-based diagnosis was HSIL in only two cases (0.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The VIA test qualities in this setting were: a positive rate of 6.5%, a sensitivity of 60%, a specificity of 93.9%, a positive predictive value of 7.1%, a negative predictive value of 99.7% and an accuracy of 93.7%. These results are comparable to those of Pap smear in most settings.     

Comparison of three management strategies for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, after six months delay: A three-year experience in an Iranian university hospital

Background: A Pap test result of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) presents a clinical challenge. Only 5–10% of women with ASCUS harbour serious cervical disease.
Methods: We screened 3619 women, who attended to Mirza Koochak Khan Hospital at Tehran University of Medical Sciences with Pap smears, of whom 100 returned with ASCUS. After six months, each subject underwent a standard cytology (conventional Pap smear), human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing (identifying high-risk HPV types with polymerase chain reaction) and colposcopy with multiple cervical biopsies.
Results: Mean age was 44.09 ± 8.6 years. The estimated prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) II or higher was 4%. When histologically verified high-grade lesions (≥ CIN II) were observed, the relative sensitivity of HPV DNA testing was 100% compared with conventional Pap smear, which performed 75% versus 100% relative sensitivity, respectively, using cytological diagnosis high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) as the cut-off. Negative and positive predictive values (NPV and PPV) of Pap test were 98.9% and 100%. The NPV and PPV of HPV DNA testing were 100%.
Conclusions: Although less complicated than colposcopy, the repeat Pap smear triage algorithm for ASCUS may underdiagnose some women with high-grade CIN, when compared with colposcopy. Considering the high sensitivity of HPV testing, it may be useful as an alternative to the current policy of six-month repeat cytology for women with ASCUS results.     

Cytology versus visual inspection with acetic acid among women treated previously with cryotherapy in a low-resource setting

Objective

To compare visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) with conventional cervical cytology as a follow-up cervical cancer screening method in women who had been treated previously with cryotherapy.

Methods

Salvadoran women screened with VIA and treated with cryotherapy within 3 years were eligible to participate. Study participants were rescreened with VIA, Pap smear, colposcopy, 4-quandrant biopsy, and endocervical curettage.

Results

Of 147 women enrolled in the study, post-cryotherapy VIA was positive in 39 women (26.5%; 95% CI, 19.6%-34.4%). Of these 39, 1 woman had CIN 1 or higher on biopsy. Post-cryotherapy Pap smear was positive (ASCUS or higher) in 6 women (4.1%; 95% CI, 1.5%-8.7%). Of these 6, 2 women had CIN 1 or higher on biopsy. Post-cryotherapy specificity was significantly higher for Pap compared with VIA (95.8% [138/144]; 95% CI, 91.2%-98.5% vs 73.6% [106/144]; 95% CI, 65.6%-80.6%; P < 0.001).

Conclusion

As the single-visit approach for cervical cancer screening gains popularity, more women will have been treated with cryotherapy. Appropriate follow-up screening is therefore vital. Cytology may be a more suitable screening method than VIA in low-resource settings for women treated previously with cryotherapy.     

Human papillomavirus testing improves the accuracy of colposcopy in detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

To assess the performance of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and colposcopy in detection of cervical pathology. A series of 389 women referred for colposcopy due to an abnormal Pap smear had cervical swabs analyzed for oncogenic (high-risk [HR]) HPV types using Hybrid Capture II (HC2) assay. Loop electrical excision procedure cone biopsy (88%) or colposcopic biopsy (11%) was used as the gold standard. Of the atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) smears, 48% were positive for HR HPV, as compared to 76.3% of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) smears. HR HPV was detected in 66.7% and 90% of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1 and CIN2 (or higher), respectively. The sensitivity of the Pap smear using an ASCUS threshold in detecting high-grade CIN was 94.5% (95% confidence intervals (CI): 91-97%) and that of colposcopy 98.5% (95% CI: 95-99%). The respective specificities were 30% (95% CI: 17-28%) and 35.6% (CI: 29-42%). HC2 test had comparable sensitivity, 90% (95% CI: 85-93%), but higher specificity, 54.3% (95% CI: 47-61%). Combining HC2 test with Pap increased specificity, 66.7% and 41.3% for ASCUS and LSIL cutoff, respectively. The minor-abnormality threshold together with HC2 increased specificity of colposcopy with no changes in sensitivity. High viral load (>100 relative light unit/positive control) was associated with significant disease. HPV DNA testing improves the accuracy of colposcopy in the detection of high-grade CIN in women with ASCUS or LSIL smears.     

Visual inspection with acetic acid as a feasible screening test for cervical neoplasia in Iran

The aim of this study was to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of visual inspection of the uterine cervix with acetic acid (VIA) as a screening test for cervical carcinoma and its precursors. One thousand and two hundred eligible women were screened by VIA and Papanicolaou smear. Those positive on one or both of these screening tests (n = 308) or those who had clinically suspicious lesions, even if the tests were negative [25% of remainders (n = 290)], were referred for colposcopy. Three hundred and fifty five of 598 women at colposcopy underwent biopsies or endocervical curettage. Those with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia I (CIN I) or worse lesions, diagnosed by histology, were considered true positive. VIA was positive in 191 women (16.1%). In 175 true-positive cases, VIA detected 130 cases, yielding a sensitivity of 74.3% and a specificity of 94%. By considering atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance or worse lesions on Papanicolaou smear as referring threshold for colposcopy, the sensitivity and specificity of cytology were 72 and 90.2%, respectively. In conclusion, the sensitivity and specificity of VIA is high and comparable with that of cytology. Hence, VIA can be undertaken as a feasible method of screening in cervical cancer in countries where access to cytopathology is limited.     

Expanded cytological referral criteria for colposcopy in cervical screening: comparison with human papillomavirus testing

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to investigate whether expanded cytologic referral criteria for colposcopy or the addition of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing on cervical screening could improve the rates of detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). METHODS: HPV testing by semiquantitative polymerase chain reaction/ELISA was performed in 1000 women who were self-referred for routine Pap smear. They underwent colposcopy following an abnormal smear result or a positive HPV test. As abnormal smear results were considered reports of low- or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, and even HPV-associated reactive cellular changes (mild koilocytosis, mild dyskeratocytosis, hyperchromatic nuclei, bimultinucleation, and cleared cytoplasm). Loop excision of the transformation zone was performed in women with cytology and colposcopy indicative of CIN, as well as in women with normal cytology but positive HPV test and colposcopic impression of CIN. RESULTS: The Pap test was abnormal in 89% of the cases of CIN 1 (34/38) and 96% of CIN 2/3 (27/28) diagnosed in our population. HPV testing picked up four additional cases of CIN 1 (11%) and one case of CIN 2/3 (4%). Overall the HPV test detected 95% of the cases of CIN 1 (36/38) and 89% of the cases of CIN 2/3 (25/28). CONCLUSION: HPV testing does not appear to add significantly to cytology in terms of positive predictive value or detection rate, if extended cytologic indications for colposcopy are used.