Determination of peroxides in saliva--kinetics of peroxide release into saliva during home-bleaching with Whitestrips and Vivastyle

Aim of the study was to determine peroxides in saliva, released during bleaching procedures. Upper incisors of five subjects were bleached with Whitestrips (5% H2O2) and Vivastyle (10% carbamide peroxide, tray charged with 225mg) for 30min, each on different days. Saliva was collected before and during the whole period of bleaching at different intervals. The amount of peroxide in the salivary samples was assessed with peroxidase, phenol and 4-aminoantipyrin in a photometric assay. Additionally the amount of peroxides in the bleaching material was determined before and after the bleaching, so that the peroxide release into saliva could be balanced. The amount of peroxides released into saliva was related to the bleaching system and only partially influenced by the individual salivary flow rate. Bleaching with Vivastyle led to lower release of peroxides into saliva compared to Whitestrips (Vivastyle: 0.8+/-0.17mg; Whitestrips: 1.5+/-0.84mg). Salivary flow rate was not correlated to release of peroxides from the bleaching products. It can be concluded that the enzymatic method adopting 4-aminoantipyrin and peroxidase is valid for the determination of peroxides in saliva. Furthermore distinctly more peroxides are released into the oral cavity from Whitestrips than from trays charged with Vivastyle .     

Peroxide release into saliva from five different home bleaching systems in vivo

PURPOSE: This study determined hydrogen peroxide release into the oral cavity during use of different home bleaching products and compared them with accepted safe levels. METHODS: Determination of peroxide in saliva was performed with peroxidase, phenol and 4-aminoantipyrin in a photometric method. Upper jaw incisors were bleached with individual trays charged with 350 mg Opalescence 10%, Opalescence 15% (OP) and Vivastyle (V). Additionally, Whitestrips (WS) designed for upper or lower jaw were used. All systems were adopted by five subjects for 30 minutes on different days. Whole saliva was collected at 2-minute intervals during the first 10 minutes of bleaching and every 5 minutes thereafter. RESULTS: Highest release of peroxide was found for all products in the saliva sample collected initially after application of the bleaching agent. Total amount of peroxide released into saliva during 30-minute bleaching period was 0.78+/-0.45 for Opalescence 10% and 1.52+/-0.44 mg for Opalescence 15%. Significantly more peroxide was released from Vivastyle (2.67+/-1.03 mg) and from Whitestrips (upper: 3.25+/-5,65, lower: 2.09+/-0.34 mg). A significantly smaller fraction of the charged peroxides was released into saliva from individual trays than from Whitestrips during the 30-minute use time. From the peroxide loaded in the trays or strips the following fractions were released during the application period: Opalescence 10% (6.4+/-3.7%), Opalescence 15% (8+/-2.4%), Vivastyle (18.6+/-8.5%), upper Whitestrips (30.4+/-4.9), lower Whitestrips (27.4+/-4.4%). In terms of amount/kg body weight the bleaching systems led to a single exposure of 0.013-0.056 mg/kg which is distinctly less than the maximum safe daily dose of 0.26 mg/kg/day if calculated for a small person (58 kg/128 lbs).     

Effect on enamel microhardness of two consumer-available bleaching solutions when compared with a dentist-prescribed, home-applied bleaching solution and a control

Background: There exists limited data in the literature regarding the efficacy and safety of consumer‐available, paint‐on bleaching solutions. Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of two consumer‐available, paint‐on bleaching products on enamel microhardness against a control and a dentist‐prescribed, home‐applied (DPHA) bleaching product. Materials and Methods: Eighty enamel slabs were obtained from extracted human teeth and randomly divided into four treatment groups: (1) control; (2) Opalescence (Ultradent Products, Inc., South Jordan, UT, USA); (3) Crest Night Effects (Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH, USA); and (4) Colgate Simply White Night (Colgate‐Palmolive Co., Piscataway, NJ, USA). Opalescence is a carbamide peroxide DPHA product, whereas Crest Night Effects and Colgate Simply White Night are consumer‐available products. The specimens in groups 2 to 4 underwent 2 weeks of treatment for 8 h/d. Specimens were maintained in artificial saliva at 37°C between treatments. Subsequently, one‐half of the specimens in groups 2 to 4 (n= 10) underwent an additional seven treatments for 8 h/d, while the other half were stored in artificial saliva, receiving no further treatment. Microhardness was measured as Knoop hardness numbers (KHNs) at baseline and after 1, 7, 14, and 21 treatment days. The results were analyzed for statistical significance both intra‐ and intergroups using analysis of variance (p= .05). Results: A statistically significant reduction in mean KHN was observed compared with baseline at 1, 7, 14, and 21 treatment days for group 4 and at 7 treatment days for group 3. When compared with the control or DPHA product, group 4 was the only treatment that resulted in significantly lower mean KHNs at 7, 14, and 21 treatment days. Conclusion: When evaluating enamel microhardness, consumer available, paint‐on bleaching solutions may adversely affect enamel microhardness compared to a control and 10% carbamide peroxide DPHA bleaching solution.     

Diffusion of peroxides through dentine in vitro with and without prior use of a desensitizing varnish

Different bleaching regimens are used in dentistry possibly penetrating the dentine and affecting the pulp. The aim of the present study was to investigate peroxide diffusion through dentine pre-treated with a desensitizing varnish (Vivasens®) in a standardized in vitro setup during application of different bleaching materials. The penetration was tested using 1.3-mm-thick bovine dentine slabs. The following bleaching materials were tested with and without prior application of the desensitizing varnish on the external side of the dentine slabs: Vivastyle, Whitestrips, Simply White, Opalescence (external bleaching), and sodium perborate (internal bleaching, only tested without varnish; n?=?8 samples per subgroup). The penetration of peroxides was measured photometrically using 4-aminoantipyrin as a substrate, the penetration of peroxides was monitored over 240 min. All bleaching agents yielded a diffusion of peroxides through the dentine, the kinetics of penetration were approximately linear for all materials tested. The significantly highest diffusion of peroxides was observed with Opalescence, the lowest with sodium perborate. The adoption of the desensitizing varnish reduced the diffusion of peroxides significantly for all external bleaching materials. Peroxides penetrated the dentine during application of bleaching materials; the penetration of peroxides can be reduced by application of a desensitizing agent.     

The effect of 2 different bleaching regimens on the surface roughness and hardness of tooth-colored restorative materials.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of 10% carbamide peroxide (Vivastyle/Vivadent) and 6.5% hydrogen peroxide strip bands (Crest Professional Whitestrips) on the surface roughness and hardness of the 3 different tooth-colored restoratives: an ormocer (Definite), a packable composite (Filtek P60), and a flowable composite (Filtek Flow). METHOD AND MATERIALS: A total of 48 specimens (10 mm in diameter and 2 mm thick) of each material were fabricated against a mylar surface. After being polished with Sof-Lex discs, they were randomly divided into 3 groups of 16 and treated as follows: group I was stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 2 weeks (control), group II was treated with Vivastyle for 2 hours per day for 2 weeks, and group III was treated with Whitestrips for 30 minutes twice a day for 2 weeks. For groups II and III, the specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C during the hiatus period. At the end of the test period, the specimens were first subjected to surface roughness and then to microhardness tests. The data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: Both bleaching regimens increased the surface roughness of the materials (P <.05), but Whitestrips significantly increased the roughness of materials more than did Vivastyle (P <.05). Both bleaching regimens decreased significantly the hardness of tested materials except Filtek P60 (P <.05). CONCLUSION: Bleaching agents may affect the surface of existing restorations; therefore, they should not be used indiscriminately when tooth-colored restorations are present.     

In vitro evaluation of tooth-color change using four paint-on tooth whiteners

The effectiveness of four paint-on tooth whiteners was evaluated and compared in this in vitro study. Sixty extracted anterior teeth were selected and randomly assigned to five groups: 1-(AS) Artificial Saliva (Roxane); 2-(MSW) Sparkling White (Meijer); 3-(CNE) Crest Night Effects (Procter & Gamble); 4-(ABB) Beautifully Bright (Avon) and 5-(CSWN) Simply White Night Gel (Colgate-Palmolive). The teeth were cleaned with a soft bristle toothbrush and toothpaste (Procter & Gamble) to remove any residue from the storage solution. The bleaching gels were painted onto the surface of the teeth, and they were then wrapped in gauze moistened with artificial saliva and kept in 100% humidity at 98 degrees F in a laboratory oven (Precision Scientific model 18EG) for 24 hours. The treatment was repeated once a day for 14 days. Visual color assessment was done using a value-oriented Vitapan Classical Shade Guide (Vident) and a colorimeter (Minolta Chroma Meter CR 321). PVS jigs (Exaflex, GC America) were fabricated for each tooth. Visual and colorimetric readings were recorded at baseline, 7 and 14 days. One-way ANOVA and Tukey multiple comparisons test were used to assess differences between groups. CNE and CSWN presented the highest mean number of shade changes and deltaE*ab Colorimeter readings. ABB and MSW did not significantly lighten the teeth, as measured by either method of evaluation after two weeks of the bleaching regimen.     

Effects of hydrogen peroxide bleaching strip gels on dental restorative materials in vitro: surface microhardness and surface morphology

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the effects of peroxide tooth bleaching, including Crest Whitestrips hydrogen peroxide gel treatments, on the surface hardness and morphology of common dental restorative treatments. METHODOLOGY: American Dental Association (ADA) recommended dental restorative materials, including amalgam, dental gold, porcelain, glass ionomer, and composites, were prepared according to manufacturers' instructions. A cycling treatment methodology was employed which alternated ex vivo human salivary exposures with bleaching treatments under conditions of controlled temperature and durations of treatment. Bleaching treatments included commercial Crest Whitestrips bleaching gels, which utilize hydrogen peroxide as the in situ bleaching source, and several commercial carbamide peroxide bleaching gels. Control treatments included placebo gels and an untreated group. Crest Whitestrips bleaching included treatment exposures simulating recommended clinical exposures (14 hours), along with excess bleaching simulating exposure to five times suggested Crest Whitestrips use. At the conclusion of treatments, surface microhardness measures and surface morphological assessments with standard and variable pressure (VP-) SEMs were conducted to assess the effects of bleaching exposure on the surface morphology and structural integrity of the restoratives. RESULTS: Surface microhardness and SEM measures revealed no significant deleterious effects on the restoration surfaces from Whitestrips gels. CONCLUSION: These results confirm that tooth bleaching from the selected commercial hydrogen peroxide or carbamide peroxide bleaching systems does not produce changes in surface morphology or microhardness of common dental restorative materials. These results support the clinical safety of the selected commercial bleaching systems to the oral environment, matching results obtained from long-term use of these ingredients applied in dental offices and available in commercial formulations.     

Effects of Crest Whitestrips bleaching on subsurface microhardness and ultrastructure of tooth enamel and coronal dentin

PURPOSE: To describe the complementary subsurface analysis of structural and ultrastructural effects of bleaching with Crest Whitestrips on enamel and coronal dentin METHODS: Human tooth enamel specimens were cycled through a daily regimen including salivary immersions and treatments with commercial tooth whitening gels containing hydrogen peroxide or carbamide peroxide. Treatments with hydrogen peroxide in Crest Whitestrips gel base were carried out for up to 70 hours bleaching (some five fold to the clinical exposure required to produce satisfactory whitening in bleaching strip systems as established by double blind placebo controlled clinical studies) [correction]. Following in vitro laboratory cycling, the teeth were cross sectioned and remounted for observation of microhardness and ultrastructural characteristics in subsurface regions. Ultrastructure was assessed by application of confocal laser scanning microscopy (reflection mode). RESULTS: Peroxide whitening compositions had no effects on subsurface microhardness of enamel or dentin, even under conditions of five fold overbleaching. Crest Whitestrips gel containing up to 6.5% hydrogen peroxide applied for periods up to 70 hours (five kit) overbleaching was found to produce no changes (at a lateral resolution of 200-300 nm) in observed subsurface enamel and dentin ultrastructure or architecture.     

Effect of bleaching on subsurface micro-hardness of composite and a polyacid modified composite.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of different bleaching techniques on subsurface physical properties of composite and polyacid modified composite tested via determination of micro-hardness. METHODS: Specimens of Tetric Flow, Tetric EvoCeram and Compoglass were light cured (2.5mm thickness) and stored in artificial saliva for 2 weeks (n=12/group). The samples were only removed for application of the following bleaching agents in a humid atmosphere: Either Vivastyle (1h/d), Whitestrips (30min/d), sodium-perborate-water mixture (once for 72h), Simply White (1h/d), or Opalescence XtraBoost (1st and 5th day for 15min) were applied on the surfaces of the samples. Untreated specimens served as negative controls, samples treated with ethyl alcohol for 1h acted as positive controls. After the bleaching period, samples were cross-sectioned and the micro-hardness (Knoop) of different subsurface levels (0.1mm-2.0mm) was determined. RESULTS: All bleaching techniques significantly reduced the Knoop-hardness of the restoratives compared to untreated controls. Thereby, bleaching significantly affected not only superficial but also the deep layers of the specimens: in superficial layers (0.1mm, 0.2mm) lowest micro-hardness values amounted to 69.5% and 76.3% of the respective untreated controls (Compoglass/Vivastyle). In deeper subsurface levels, the lowest hardness was observed with Opalescence/Tetric EvoCeram (0.3mm: 78.3%; 0.4mm: 80%; 0.5mm: 80.5%; 1.0mm: 84.2%; 2.0mm: 84.4%). SIGNIFICANCE: Bleaching with the tested bleaching agents softens the adhesive restorative materials examined. Due to the fact that subsurface layers are also affected, polishing of the surface may not suffice for re-establishing the physical properties of the surface of the fillings.     

Surface microhardness of enamel after different home bleaching procedures.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of different home bleaching procedures on surface microhardness of human enamel. METHODS: Among eight groups 192 incisors were distributed. The facial surface of each incisor was polished and baseline hardness of enamel (m0; Knoop) was assessed with a load of 1N for 30s. Subsequently, the enamel was treated for 14 days with the bleaching agent: groups 1, 2 and 4 Viva Style Paint on, 8% carbamide peroxide (CP) 1x20min, 2x20min and 2x5min; group 3 Colgate Simply White, 5.9% hydrogen peroxide (HP), 2x30min; group 5 Viva Style 10% CP 1x1h; group 6 Blend-a-med White Strips, 5.9% HP 2x30min; group 7 Odol-med3 Beauty-Kur, sodium chlorite 2x10min; group 8 control, running water 1x1h. Hardness was reassessed after the last bleaching treatment (m1) and after 6 weeks storage in artificial saliva (m2). RESULTS: Changes in microhardness were as follows (m0-m1): (1) -2.3 (+/-20.3); (2) -8.9 (+/-27.2); (3) 63.4 (+/-56.3); (4) 9.6 (+/-30.1); (5) 12.8 (+/-62.6); (6) 92.2 (+/-50.2); (7) 158.4 (+/-59.7); (8) 10.6 (+/-38.5). Statistical analysis showed that hardness values were significantly (p< or =0.0005; Wilcoxon test) reduced in groups 3, 6, and 7 (m1) and in group 7 (m2). SIGNIFICANCE: Both type of bleaching agent and concentration have a significant influence on the microhardness of enamel. The most critical bleaching agent seems to be the one containing sodium chlorite in combination with citric acid.     

Efficacy and safety assessment of a new liquid tooth whitening gel containing 5.9% hydrogen peroxide

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new 5.9% hydrogen peroxide liquid, invisible gel, (Colgate Simply-White Whitening Gel). METHODS: A total of 30 subjects were enrolled into the study and divided into two treatment groups (Colgate vs. placebo gel). Efficacy was assessed using VITA shade scores and safety evaluations were performed including the examination of plaque index (PI), bleeding index (BOP), gingival recession and dentin hypersensitivity. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the mean change from baseline. RESULTS: The new whitening gel containing 5.9% hydrogen peroxide was significantly effective in lightening tooth shade. After only 2 weeks, patients enrolled in the study exhibited an overall mean 4.48-shade improvement from baseline, which was significantly greater than placebo group and far exceeded the ADA minimum requirements to claim "clinical efficacy". In the new Colgate Simply White Clear Whitening Gel group, periodontal health (PI and BOP) improved with time overall. Moreover, dentin hypersensitivity did not significantly increase, and all treatments were generally well tolerated. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The new Colgate Simply White whitening gel containing 5.9% hydrogen peroxide allowed consistent bleaching using minimal contact time, without adversely impacting overall tolerability.     

Comparative tooth whitening efficacy of 18% carbamide peroxide liquid whitening gel using three different regimens

OBJECTIVE: Recently, a novel paint-on liquid whitening gel--Colgate Simply White Clear Whitening Gel--which contains 18% carbamide peroxide, has been developed as a self-administered tooth bleaching system. The purpose of the present study was to determine the efficacy and safety of this product using alternate exaggerated or simplified treatment regimens. METHODOLOGY: This was a three-week clinical trial using a parallel, double-blind, stratified protocol with three different instructions for application: 1) twice-daily, no air-drying, and 15 minutes without eating/drinking; 2) three times daily, 30-second air-drying and 30 minutes without eating/drinking; or 3) four times daily, 30-second air-drying and 30 minutes without eating/drinking. One-hundred and twenty (120) healthy volunteers were balanced into three equal groups based on shade scores (A3 or darker). Clinical evaluations (shade guide, oral tissue health, gingival index and visual analog sensitivity score) were performed on each group at baseline and weekly for the next 21 days. At the conclusion of the study, a survey of the subjects' opinions on their assigned product regimen was also conducted. RESULTS: Subjects who used Colgate Simply White Clear Whitening Gel three and four times daily achieved the greatest shade improvement (5.88 +/- 1.53 shades, and 5.57 +/- 1.54, respectively). However, these values were only about one shade better than the value observed for the more convenient, twice-daily, "no-dry" regimen (4.51 +/- 1.77 shades), though they were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The result for the four-times daily protocol was not statistically different from the three-times group. Also, no differences were observed between the groups concerning oral tissue health, gingival index or tooth sensitivity, and no adverse effects were observed or reported regardless of the regimen used. Surveys completed by the subjects showed that those who used the twice-daily, "no-dry" regimen found the product to be the easiest to use, the most comfortable and the most pleasant tasting. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded from the clinical data that three or four applications of Colgate Simply White Clear Whitening Gel per day provided better efficacy. In addition, the use of the whitening gel twice daily, even without "dry time" and only 15 minutes without eating/drinking, yielded results that were comparable to previously reported results using the original on-label directions. The potential additional benefit to the "simplified regimen" is that it was perceived to be the most convenient and comfortable. The use of Colgate Simply White Clear Whitening Gel up to four times daily for up to three weeks is also safe, and the tendency of abusing the product with more frequent daily use may be deterred by the inconvenience reported by the study subjects.     

Effect of tray-based and trayless tooth whitening systems on microhardness of enamel surface and subsurface

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of tray-based and trayless tooth whitening systems on surface and subsurface microhardness of human enamel. METHODS: Enamel slabs were obtained from recently extracted human third molars. Specimens were randomly assigned to six groups according to tooth whitening treatment (n = 10): 6.0% hydrogen peroxide (HP) (Crest Whitestrips), 6.5% HP (Crest Professional Whitestrips), 7.5% HP (Day White Excel 3), 9.5% HP (Day White Excel 3), 10% carbamide peroxide (Opalescence), and a control group (untreated). Specimens were treated for 14 days following manufacturers' recommended protocols, and were immersed in artificial saliva between treatments. Enamel surface Knoop microhardness (KHN) was measured immediately before treatment, and at days 1, 7, and 14 of treatment. After treatment, subsurface microhardness was measured at depths of 50-500 microm. Data were analyzed for statistical significance using analysis of variance. RESULTS: Differences in microhardness for treated vs. untreated enamel surface were not statistically significant at any time interval. For 6.5% and 9.5% HP, there was a decrease in surface microhardness values during treatment, but at the end of treatment the microhardness values were not statistically different from the baseline values. For the enamel subsurface values, no differences were observed between treated vs. untreated specimens at each depth. Trayless and tray-based tooth whitening treatments do not significantly affect surface or subsurface enamel microhardness.     

Effects of hydrogen peroxide bleaching strips on tooth surface color, surface microhardness, surface and subsurface ultrastructure, and microchemical (Raman spectroscopic) composition

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the effects of hydrogen peroxide tooth bleaching strips on the surface hardness and morphology of enamel and the ultrastructure and chemical composition of enamel and dentin in vitro. METHODOLOGY: Sound human molars were ground and polished to prepare a uniform substrate for bleaching treatments. A cycling treatment methodology was employed which alternated ex vivo human salivary exposures with bleaching treatments under conditions of controlled temperature and durations of treatment. Bleaching treatments included commercial Crest Whitestrips bleaching strips, which utilize hydrogen peroxide in a gel as the in situ bleaching source at 6.0 and 6.5% concentrations of H2O2. Control treatments included an untreated group. Crest Whitestrips bleaching included treatment exposures simulating 2x the recommended clinical exposures (28 hours bleaching). Surface color measurements were taken prior to and following bleaching to ensure tooth bleaching activity. The effects of bleach on physical properties of enamel were assessed with microhardness measures. Ultrastructural effects were classified by surface and subsurface confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) techniques. In addition, the effects of bleaching on tooth microchemical composition was studied in different tooth regions by coincident assessment of Raman spectroscopic signature. RESULTS: Color assessments confirmed significant ex vivo tooth bleaching by Whitestrips. Surface microhardness and SEM measures revealed no deleterious effects on the enamel surfaces. CLSM micromorphological assessments supported the safety of hydrogen peroxide bleaching strips both on surface and subsurface enamel, DEJ, and dentin ultrastructure. Raman spectroscopy analysis demonstrated no obvious effects of bleaching treatments on the microchemical composition of enamel and dentin. CONCLUSION: These results confirm that tooth bleaching with hydrogen peroxide whitening strips does not produce changes in surface/subsurface histomorphology or in surface microhardness and ultrastructure of treated teeth. In addition, for the first time, these results confirm the safety of hydrogen peroxide bleaching strips to tooth microchemical composition as measured by Raman spectroscopy.     

Comparative study of the effects of two bleaching agents on oral microbiota

This study evaluated the in vivo effects of bleaching agents containing 10% carbamide peroxide (Platinum/Colgate) or 7.5% hydrogen peroxide (Day White 2Z/Discus Dental) on mutans Streptococcus during dental bleaching. The products were applied on 30 volunteers who needed dental bleaching. In each volunteer, one of the two bleaching agents was used on both dental arches one hour a day for three weeks. Analysis of the bacterial counts was made by collecting saliva before (baseline values), during (7 and 21 days) bleaching treatments and 14 days posttreatment. The Friedman non-parametric analysis (alpha=0.05) found no differences in microorganism counts at different times for each group for both agents (p>0.05). The Mann Whitney nonparametric test (alpha=0.05) showed no differences in micro-organism counts for both agents (p>0.05). Different bleaching agents did not change the oral cavity mutans Streptococcus counts.     

Vital bleaching with a thin peroxide gel: the safety and efficacy of a professional-strength hydrogen peroxide whitening strip

BACKGROUND: Use of higher peroxide concentrations for professional at-home vital bleaching often balances two factors in patient compliance: whitening and tolerability. Development of a polyethylene strip coated with a very thin (0.10-millimeter) layer of 14 percent hydrogen peroxide gel (Crest Whitestrips Supreme, Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati)--which represents an increase in concentration and a decrease in amount of gel--was believed to allow for greater at-home whitening with little additional oral soft-tissue exposure to peroxide. METHODS: The authors conducted a randomized, double-blind, two-week clinical trial with 38 adults to evaluate the safety and efficacy of twice-daily use of the thin, concentrated bleaching gel strip versus the effects of a control product (Crest Whitestrips, Procter & Gamble). The two products differed only in concentration (14 percent versus 6 percent) and gel layer thickness (0.10 mm versus 0.20 mm). The authors measured efficacy from digital images using the Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage L*a*b* color scale. They assessed safety via subject interviews and clinical examination and compared treatments using analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Relative to baseline color, both strip groups exhibited significant (P < .001) improvement in yellowness, brightness and composite color change. Between-group comparisons after two weeks demonstrated significant (P < .003) color improvement for the experimental strip relative to the control. Both products were well-tolerated generally. Despite the concentration differences, clinical examination of each group showed a similar low level (11 percent) of "minor oral irritation." CONCLUSION: Use of the thin 14 percent hydrogen peroxide gel strip resulted in greater whitening, including 42 to 49 percent greater improvement in tooth color and faster whitening onset than that seen with a 6 percent hydrogen peroxide whitening strip, without clinical evidence of increased oral-tissue irritation. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Use of whitening strips with a thin, concentrated layer of hydrogen peroxide gel may represent a useful approach for professionally directed at-home vital bleaching.     

Dental effects of home bleaching gels and whitening strips on the surface hardness of resin composites

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of two bleaching gels and two whitening strips on surface hardness of four resin composites in vitro. METHODS: 60 cylindrical samples of each composite (Surefil, Charisma, Admira, Flowline) were prepared (4 mm thickness and 6 mm diameter) and stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours. These samples were randomly divided into six test groups (n=10). One group was selected for baseline and Vickers microhardness measurements (load= 100 g, dwell time 20 seconds) were taken immediately. The other groups were treated for 21 days with one of the following: distilled water (control), containing 10% carbamide peroxide bleaching gel (Perfect Bleach), 16% carbamide peroxide bleaching gel (Viva Style), 5.3% hydrogen peroxide whitening strips (Crest Whitestrips) and 14% hydrogen peroxide whitening strips (Crest Whitestrips Supreme). The treated samples were also subsequently subjected to the same microhardness testing by using the same method as applied to the baseline measurements. Data were analyzed statistically (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: Overall, the lowest surface hardness value was observed in baseline measurements. An increase in surface hardness was noted in all of the other groups. The higher surface hardness values were found in control, whitening strip (5.3% HP) and bleaching gel (10% CP) groups than whitening strip (14% HP) group. Bleaching gel (16% CP) was statistically different from only baseline measurements. In addition, regardless of the tested groups, statistically significant differences in surface hardness were observed between composite materials. Surefil showed the highest hardness values while Flowline presented the lowest hardness values.     

The effect of smoking and periodontal treatment on salivary composition in patients with established periodontitis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of smoking on the periodontal status and the salivary composition in subjects with established periodontitis before and after periodontal therapy. METHODS: Our study group included 26 healthy subjects, 12 smokers and 14 non-smokers with established periodontitis. Clinical measurements and non-stimulated whole saliva were obtained and analyzed at baseline and after scaling and root planing. Smokers presented at baseline with significantly greater probing depth (4.16+/-0.26) compared to non-smokers (3.52+/-0.32) which was statistically significant (P = 0.0268); likewise, baseline clinical attachment level was greater in smokers (4.49+/-0.31 compared to non-smokers 3.87+/-0.13; P = 0.0620). Mean plaque index was also greater in smokers compared to non-smokers (0.86 and 0.65, respectively; P = 0.0834). Baseline pretreatment sodium values were significantly greater in non-smokers (14.36 mEq/l compared to 9.31 mEq/l in smokers; P = 0.0662); likewise non-smokers exhibited 50% greater salivary calcium levels (6.04 mg/100 ml compared to 4.32 mg/100 ml in smokers; P = 0.0133). RESULTS: Post-treatment probing depth and clinical attachment level were not different between smokers and non-smokers; this in spite of significant difference in plaque index in smokers (0.35 compared to 0.13 in non-smokers; P = 0.0135). Post-treatment, smokers had reduced calcium concentration (3.58 mg/100 ml compared to 5.11 mg/100 ml in non-smokers; P = 0.0438). Treatment affected albumin level in smokers only, consequently non-smokers had significantly greater salivary albumin concentration (1.1 mg/100 ml compared to 0.38 mg/100 ml in smokers; P = 0.0274). CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with established periodontitis exhibited elevated concentrations of salivary electrolytes and proteins. Within this study group, smokers exhibited greater disease level but reduced sodium, calcium, and magnesium concentrations. Smokers responded favorably to treatment. The clinical improvement eliminated the differences in salivary composition.     

Influence of bleaching agents and desensitizing varnishes on the water content of dentin

This in vitro study investigated the possible dehydration of dentin caused by bleaching agents. Furthermore, it tested whether protective dentin varnishes can maintain the physiological moisture of dentin during bleaching treatment. Fifty-five standardized dentin cylinders were prepared from freshly extracted bovine incisors under constant water irrigation. Prior to bleaching, the treatment specimens were conditioned at room temperature in a hygrophor for 14 days. The samples were divided into 11 groups. The Group A specimens, which were completely dehydrated, and Group B, which was stored for 2 weeks in a hygrophor, served as controls (A, B n=5). The other samples (n=10 each group) were coated with Vivasens [VS] (C), Bilfuorid [BF] (D) and Seal&Protect [SP] (E). Five specimens from each group (C-E) were subsequently treated with an experimental bleaching gel (Exp BG) (20% carbamide peroxide [CP], glycerine-based gel): Cb, Db, Eb. The remaining specimens were bleached with Exp BG (F) only, Vivastyle (G: 16% CP, glycerine-based gel) or Vivastyle Paint On (H: 6% CP-varnish) for 7 days (n=5 each group) with bleaching time for gels: 2 hours/day, paint on: 20 minutes/day. After the respective treatments, the overall water content of each specimen was determined using the analytical method of Karl-Fischer-titration. The water content of bovine dentin (Group B, mean%+/-SD) obtained in this study amounted to 15.24+/-0.4. All bleaching products significantly reduced the water content compared to the controls (exp BG: 13.32+/-0.47, Vivastyle 13.2+/-0.27, paint on 13.72+/-0.54; p<0.05). Also, application of SP before bleaching resulted in reduced water content (14.06+/-0.12; p=0.0005). However, bleaching with exp BG following use of VS (14.99+/-0.42) or SP (13.85+/-0.26) did not result in a reduction of water content in dentin. Pretreatment with BF did not protect dentin from water loss during bleaching (12.44+/-0.38; bi p=0.0009). All glycerine-based bleaching products used in this study had a significant dehydrating effect on dentin. The application of protective varnishes prior to bleaching treatment may reduce or even prevent dentin dehydration.     

In vitro evaluation of toothbrushing abrasion of differently bleached bovine enamel

PURPOSE: To evaluate in vitro, the effect of different external bleaching agents on the susceptibility of enamel against toothbrushing abrasion. METHODS: 96 bovine enamel specimens were embedded in acrylic resin, polished and covered with tape except for a 1.4 x 10 mm window. The samples were divided into eight groups (A-H), 12 specimens each (A-G) were treated with seven different home-bleaching (A: Whitestrips, B: Rapid White, C: Opalescence 10%, D: Opalescence PF 15%) and in-office-bleaching agents (E: Opalescence Extra, F: Opalescence Quick, G: Opalescence Extra Boost) according to manufacturers' instructions. Before and after each individual bleaching treatment the samples were brushed 40 times in an automatic brushing machine using a slurry containing artificial saliva and fluoridated toothpaste. The control group (Group H) was not bleached, but also brushed. After each cycle the specimens were stored in artificial saliva for 24 hours. RESULTS: After 20 cycles loss of enamel was determined by profilometry, resulting in the following values (mean +/- standard deviation) which were statistically analyzed: Group A: (0.169 microm +/- 0.035), Group B (11.108 microm +/- 0.655), Group C (0.207 microm +/- 0.042), Group D (0.154 microm +/- 0.028), Group E (0.081 microm +/- 0.015), Group F (0.084 microm +/- 0.018), Group G (0.087 microm +/- 0.014), Group H (0.076 microm +/- 0.012). Group B differed significantly from the other groups (r = 0.001). Samples of Groups C, D and A showed a significant difference compared to the control H (r = 0.001). Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between enamel loss of Groups E, F, G and the Control H. It could be proven that toothbrushing abrasion of bleached enamel may be increased depending on the bleaching agent and application form used. Nevertheless, with the exception of bleaching treatment with Rapid White, toothbrushing abrasion of bleached enamel seems to be clinically less relevant.