改良保留十二指肠胰头切除术治疗慢性胰腺炎的疗效分析

目的:观察改良保留十二指肠的胰头切除术(改良Beger手术)对伴胰头炎性肿块的慢性胰腺炎病人的治疗效果。方法:回顾性分析自2004年1月至2010年12月,在我院胰腺外科接受改良Beger手术治疗的51例伴胰头炎性肿块的慢性胰腺炎病人的临床资料,并对病人术后疼痛症状、生活质量及内分泌功能等进行随访。结果:无手术死亡病例,术后并发症发生率为15.7%,其中胰漏3例,胆漏2例,十二指肠漏1例,腹腔出血1例,切口裂开1例。术后6个月,病人疼痛得到明显缓解,EORTC QLQ-C30疼痛评分由(64.3±5.8)降至(12.5±3.7)(P<0.01),生活质量获显著提高,GLQI生活质量评分由(70.1±5.8)增至(86.4±6.6)(P<0.01);病人内分泌功能未受影响,无新增糖尿病病例。结论:采用改良Beger手术治疗伴胰头炎性肿块的慢性胰腺炎是安全、有效的。     

保留十二指肠胰头切除术与胰十二指肠切除术治疗慢性胰腺炎的比较研究

目的:比较保留十二指肠胰头切除术(duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection,DPPHR)与胰十二指肠切除术(pancreaticoduodenectomy,PD)治疗慢性胰腺炎的安全性及临床疗效。方法:回顾分析我院2004年1月至2010年12月接受DPPHR与PD的59例慢性胰腺炎病人,比较两种术式的术前数据、手术情况、术后并发症率、死亡率和术后住院天数等,用EORTC(European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer)QLQ-C30(Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-C30)V3.0中文版生活质量评分量表评价术后病人的生活质量。结果:共59例病人纳入研究,PD组37例,DPPHR组22例。两组术前特征无统计学差异。PD组与DPPHR组相比,在术中失血[(332±103)mL比(241±74)mL,P<0.05]、手术时间[(310±91)min比(249±71)min,P<0.05)]和术后住院天数[(14.3±9.0)d比(9.4±8.4)d,P0.05)和生活质量评分两组无统计学差异,但DPPHR组评分略优于PD组。结论:DPPHR组与PD相比在缓解慢性胰腺炎病人疼痛方面有效。两组生活质量无统计学差异。两组病人在术后并发症发生率和术后死亡率上并无统计学差异,同样安全可行,在术后住院天数、术中失血和手术时间,DPPHR组优于PD组。     

保留十二指肠的胰头切除术

自1935年Whipple首次报告了胰十二指肠切除术以来,该手术已成为治疗胰头肿瘤及炎性假瘤病变的标准术式.然而,Whipple手术是一种创伤极大的高危手术,并发症发生率高达20%～30%,死亡率近5%,且由于广泛器官切除及多个消化道吻合,易对患者消化功能造成不良影响,降低患者术后生存质量.对胰头良性和低恶性肿瘤及慢性胰腺炎患者实施该手术,切除范围过大,代价太高.     

保留十二指肠的胰头切除术与胰十二指肠切除术治疗慢性胰腺炎疗效Meta分析

目的通过Meta分析的方法,对保留十二指肠的胰头切除术与胰十二指肠切除术治疗慢性胰腺炎的疗效进行评价。方法分别在PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Library和中国生物医学文献数据库中检索1980年1月至2012年9月间发表的有关保留十二指肠的胰头切除术与胰十二指肠切除术治疗慢性胰腺炎的临床对照试验(包括随机和非随机研究)。分别按照入选和排除标准筛选,有9项临床试验纳入研究,提取所需数据,用RevMan5.1软件进行分析。结果保留十二指肠的胰头切除术与胰十二指肠切除术相比,手术死亡率(P=0.56)及疼痛缓解(P=0.53)差异无统计学意义,而两组手术总并发症(P<0.01)、住院时间(P<0.01)、新发糖尿病(P<0.01)、生活质量(P<0.01)等均显示保留十二指肠的胰头切除术优于胰十二指肠切除术。结论从目前资料来看,保留十二指肠的胰头切除术相比于胰十二指肠切除术,在治疗慢性胰腺炎的疗效上更具有优势。     

保留十二指肠胰头切除术在慢性胰腺炎治疗中的价值及评价

大多数慢性胰腺炎病人为多因素致病,如环境因素(酒精、吸烟、职业化学因素等)、基因因素(如胰蛋白酶调控基因的突变),部分病人属于遗传或自身免疫性疾病[1]。慢性胰腺炎治疗目标是缓解急性或慢性疼痛,预防胰腺炎反复发作,纠正代谢的紊乱,处理并发症,解决社会-心理问题。治疗方法包括药物、介入和外科手术。药物治疗主要包括止痛药物、类固醇和酶类药物治疗、微营养素治疗。介入治疗包括内镜下十二指肠乳头切开、内镜下胰管结石取出、胰管支架置入等,这些治疗起到缓解胰腺导管梗阻的作用[2]。内镜下支架置入适用于不宜行外科治疗的病人,但不推荐作为确定性治疗手段[3]。     

保留十二指肠的胰头切除术治疗胰腺分隔症并发慢性胰腺炎的疗效分析

目的探讨保留十二指肠的胰头切除术对胰腺分隔症并发慢性胰腺炎的治疗效果。方法回顾性分析 1989～ 1997年间 2 2例胰腺分隔症并发慢性胰腺炎患者接受保留十二指肠的胰头切除术的临床资料。结果本组术后平均住院时间为 13d ,无手术死亡 ,无严重并发症发生。术后随访 33个月 ,胰腺内分泌功能无明显变化 ,部分患者外分泌功能受损 ,腹痛分数由术前的 5 8± 1 1降为 3 4± 1 2 (P <0 0 5 )。结论保留十二指肠的胰头切除术是一种治疗胰腺分隔症并发慢性胰腺炎的理想手术     

保留幽门的胰头十二指肠切除术

1978年Traverso和Logmire报道2例保留幽门的胰头十二指肠切除术（PPPD），1例为慢性钙比性胰腺炎合并胰头部囊肿，另1例为十二指肠水平部肿瘤浸润胰头，术后经过良好。本手术保留了胃的贮存与消化功能，避免了胃切除术后可能发生的并发症，减少了手术创伤，有利于病人的恢复。胃液分析显示正常的胃酸分泌，钡餐透视幽门及胃排空功能正常。自SO年代以来，由于对生存质量的重视，PPPD的手术适应证不断地扩大，目前用于：①胰头及其周围的良性病变，如肿块型胰腺炎、胰胆管合流异常以及外伤等；②壶腹癌，胆管中下段痛，十二指肠癌；③恶…     

保留十二指肠的胰头切除术

慢性胰腺炎病人中，如出现内科治疗无效的严重腹痛，或是由于胰头毙性肿大引起邻近器官的并发症，均需采取外科手术治疗。治疗该症的传统术式是保留或不保留幽门的胰十二指肠切除术。为了降低术后死亡率及并发症发生率，Beget于1972年提出了保留十二指肠的胰头切除术。经过长期的病例积累和术后随访．以及与传统Whipple手术的比较．认为该术式作为一种较局限的手术，在解除疼痛及保留胰腺内分秘功能等方面均效果良好，早晚期并发症及死亡率均较低，在治疗合并胰头炎性肿物的慢性胰腺炎病人方面，可作为替代Whipple手术的术式。现就其应用现状结合近年来文献综述如下。     

胰头十二指肠切除治疗慢性胰腺炎

目的探讨胰头十二指肠切除术在胰头肿块型慢性胰腺炎诊治中可行性。方法回顾分析18例胰头肿块型慢性胰腺炎行胰头十二指肠切除术的临床资料。结果手术方式包括：Whipple法3例,Child法11例,保留十二指肠水平段胰头十二指肠切除术法4例;平均手术时间5．5±0．68h,平均出血量400±125ml;手术并发症：胆漏、胰漏2例,左膈下积液2例,肺部感染1例,其中死亡1例为胰漏伴感染出血,发生率占27．7％;平均住院日27．3±3d。结论肿块型慢性胰腺炎行胰头十二指肠切除术效果确切,是可行的,但有一定的风险。     

保留十二指肠的胰头切除术

保留十二指肠的胰头切除术中国医科大学第一临床学院普通外科（１１０００１）郭克建，田雨丽霖，董明，詹勇因腹头、十二指肠的特殊解剖关系，两者一直被认为密不可分。胰头十二指肠切除术已基本成为治疗胰头病变的标准术式。１９８０年Ｂｅｇｅｒ率先对慢性胰腺炎的病人...     

Duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resection without segment resection of the duodenum for chronic pancreatitis

Purpose  The purpose of this study was to describe a duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resection procedure without segment resection of the duodenum for the treatment of chronic pancreatitis with an enlarged pancreatic head. Materials and methods  Between January 1999 and December 2006, 35 patients with chronic pancreatitis were operated on by duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resection procedure without segment resection of the duodenum. These patients were followed up to estimate the outcomes of the surgical procedure. Results  The mortality of the surgical procedure was 0. The overall morbidity was 17%. One patient developed pancreatic fistula, three patients developed bile leakage, and no patient developed duodenal fistula. Twenty-one patients who suffered abdominal pain in preoperative stage obtained complete pain relief, the mean European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 pain scale decreased from 59 ± 27 to 13 ± 21. In the postoperative stage, the endocrine function of the patients compared equally to the preoperative stage. Conclusion  The modified procedure obtains acceptable postoperative outcomes and benefits on extirpation of inflammatory lesions and avoidance of the anastomosis of the residual pancreatic head and the jejunum.     

Five-year follow-up of a prospective non-randomised study comparing duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection with classic Whipple procedure in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis

BACKGROUND: Three prospective randomised studies were conducted to compare pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) in patients suffering from chronic pancreatitis (cP). In these three series, the superiority of the duodenum-preserving technique with regard to quality of life (QOL) and pain relief has been demonstrated. Long-term follow-up investigations have not been published so far. The present paper reports on a 5-year follow-up study of a prospective, non-randomised trial comparing classic Whipple procedure (PD) with Beger DPPHR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy patients were initially enrolled in this study. Fifty-one patients were left for the present long-term outcome analysis (PD, n = 24; DPPHR, n = 27). The follow-up included the following parameters: QOL, pain intensity, endocrine and exocrine function, and body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: The median follow-up was 63.5 (range 56-67) months. Two patients in the DPPHR group and none in the PD group underwent a re-operation. The QOL scores of the relevant symptom scales (nausea, pain, diarrhoea) and functional parameters (physical status, working ability, global QOL) were significantly better in the DPPHR group than in the PD group. Pain intensity as self-assessed by the patients was less pronounced in the DPPHR group (P < 0.001), whereas the frequency of acute episodes and analgesic medication did not differ between the two groups. No difference was observed between the two groups with regard to endocrine and exocrine function. The values of the median body mass index (BMI) in the PD group [23.4 (range 18.5-25.0) kg/m(2)] and in the DPPHR group [24.2 (range 17.9-27.8) kg/m(2)] were comparable. The 5-year outcome remained stable compared to the early post-operative data published elsewhere. CONCLUSION: This 5-year long-term outcome analysis documents the superiority of the Beger duodenum-preserving technique over the classic Whipple procedure in terms of QOL and pain intensity as self-assessed by the patients.     

Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) in chronic pancreatitis: its rationale and results

Persistent, uncontrolled pain is the most common indication for surgery in chronic pancreatitis. In the presence of an inflammatory mass in the pancreatic head or in pancreatic head-related complications of chronic pancreatitis, resection procedures are inevitable. The Whipple procedure, originally introduced for malignat lesions of the periampullary region, is commonly employed, although it represents surgical over-treatment in a benign pancreatic disorder. In this article, we discuss our long experience with duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (Beger procedure) for chronic pancreatitis. Prospective, randomized controlled trials suggest that this organ- and function-preserving procedure should be the gold standard for the surgical treatment of pancreatic head-related complications of chronic pancreatitis. Received: July 3, 2000 / Accepted: August 8, 2000     

Surgical treatment of pancreas divisum causing chronic pancreatitis: The outcome benefits of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection

Pancreas divisum (PD) represents a duct anomaly in the pancreatic head ducts, leading frequently leading to recurrent acute pancreatitis (rAP) or chronic pancreatitis (CP). Based on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, pancreas divisum can be found in 1% to 6% of patients with pancreatitis. The correlation of this abnormality with pancreatic disease is an issue of continuing controversy. Because of the underlying duct anomalies and major pathomorphological changes in the pancreatic head, duodenumpreserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) offers an option for causal treatment. Thirty-six patients with pancreatitis caused by PD were treated surgically. Thirty patients suffered from CP, 6 from rAP. The mean duration of the disease was 47.5 and 49.8 months, respectively. The age at the time of surgery was 39.2 years in the CPgroup, and 27.6 years in the rAP group. Median hospitalization since diagnosis was 18.8 weeks for CP patients and 24.6 weeks for rAP patients. Previous procedures performed in these patients included endoscopic papillotomy (30%), duct stenting (14%), and surgical treatment (17%). The median preoperative pain score was 8 on a visual analog scale. According to the classification of pancreas divisum, 10 patients demonstrated a complete PD, 25 had a functionally incomplete PD, and 1 had a dorsal duct type. The pain status as well as the endocrine (oral glucose tolerance test) and exocrine (pancreolauryl test) function were evaluated preoperatively and early and late postoperatively with a median follow-up time of 39.3 months. There was no operative-related mortality. The follow-up was 100%; 4 patients died (1 from suicide, 1 from cardiac arrest, and 2 from cancer of the esophagus). Fifty percent of the patients were completely pain-free,31%hada significant reduction of pain with a median pain score of 2 (P < 0.001). Six patients (5 CP, 1 rAP) had further attacks of acute pancreatitis with a need for hospitalization. DPPHR reduced pain and preserved the endocrine function in the majority of patients with pancreas divisum. Therefore, DPPHR is an alternative to other resective or drainage procedures after failure of interventional treatment.     

腹腔镜保留十二指肠胰头切除术的应用价值

目的:探讨腹腔镜保留十二指肠胰头切除术（LDPPHR）的应用价值。方法:采用回顾性描述性研究方法。收集2016年11月至2020年11月河北医科大学第二医院收治的25例行LDPPHR病人的临床病理资料;男7例,女18例;中位年龄为29岁,年龄范围为14~66岁。25例病人均施行LDPPHR。观察指标：（1）手术情况。（...     

改良保留十二指肠之胰头全切除术10例临床分析

目的：总结改良保留十二指肠之胰头全切除术（DPTPHR）治疗胰头部良性或低度恶性病变的诊治经验。方法：对2005年6月至2009年5月间10例行改良DPTPHR病人的资料作回顾性分析。结果：全组中男3例,女7例,平均年龄52岁,手术时间平均340min,术中失血量平均485mL。术后诊断包括导管内乳头状黏液瘤、实性假乳头状瘤、胰岛素瘤、动静脉畸形各1例,浆液性囊腺瘤、神经内分泌瘤、胰头肿块型慢性胰腺炎各2例。全组中,术后发生感染、并发大出血1例,胰瘘4例,反复呕吐1例;未发生胆瘘或十二指肠缺血。随访8～56个月,无死亡病例,无肿瘤复发。结论：改良的DPTPHR是治疗胰头部良性或低度恶性病变的较安全的术式之一。     

Quality of life in chronic pancreatitis: A prospective trial comparing classical whipple procedure and duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection

Few data are available with respect to quality of life after pancreatic head resection in patients with chronic pancreatitis. The aim of this study was to compare the classical Whipple pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with the Beger duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR), in terms of quality of life, using standardized, valid, and reliable questionnaires. Sixty-five consecutive patients were included in this study. The PD procedure was chosen when pancreatic cancer could not be ruled out (n = 30); otherwise DPPHR was performed (n = 35). Quality of life was measured prospectively three times with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the Gastrointestinal Quality-of-Life Index (GIQLI). Both procedures led to a significant improvement in quality of life, especially with regard to pain status. However, at the second follow-up examination (18 to 24 months postoperatively), all functional scales and the most important symptom scales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 revealed a better quality of life in the DPPHR group compared to the PD group. After classical PD, more patients seem to develop diabetes mellitus. The EORTC QLQ-C30 was found to be a better tool for quality-of-life assessment than the GIQLI in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Presented at the Forty-Second Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Atlanta, Georgia, May 20–23, 2001.     

A duodenum-preserving and bile duct-preserving total pancreatic head resection with associated pancreatic duct-to-duct anastomosis

A duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection technique was first reported in 1980, but the indications have been limited to benign pancreatic disease as it involves a subtotal pancreatic head resection. In 1988 we detailed a duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resection (DPTPHR) technique. This procedure involved a total pancreatic head resection and as such expanded the indications for this approach to include tumorigenic masses. The original method involved closure of the proximal pancreatic duct and an anastomosis of the pancreatic duct of the distal pancreas to a newly created small hole in the duodenum (we termed this a "pancreatoduodenostomy"). Our current technique involves a duct-to-duct anastomosis of the proximal pancreatic duct and the distal pancreas to better preserve anatomic structure. DPTPHR was performed in 26 patients from 1988 to 2002, including 12 cases of DPTPHR with pancreatoduodenostomy and 14 cases of DPTPHR with pancreatic duct-to-duct anastomosis. No differences were observed between the two methods with respect to operative time or blood loss during surgery. Postoperatively, there was one case of cholecystitis and one case of pancreatitis in a patient who underwent a pancreatoduodenostomy; both of these patients were treated conservatively with curative intent. No complications were observed in the group undergoing duct-to-duct anastomosis. The advantage of duct-to-duct anastomosis is that the pancreatic head is totally resected, thus allowing removal of neoplastic disease such as an intraductal papillary mucinous tumor and also therapy for chronic pancreatitis. A key benefit of this procedure is that sphincter function of the duodenal papilla is preserved permitting drainage of pancreatic/bile juice into the duodenum, preserving a more physiologic state than is the case after a pancreatoduodenostomy. Supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (63480311) from the Ministries of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan.