Cervical esophagogastric anastomosis with a new stapler in the surgery of esophageal carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: A new reusable circular stapler for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis (CEGA) has been used to substitute the traditional method of hand-sewn cervical anastomosis. METHODS: Over a 2-year period (09/1998-11/2000), the stapler was engaged on operations of 112 patients with thoracic esophageal carcinoma, and the anastomosis was performed through both cervical and thoracic incision. The operative approaches were through left thoracotomy in 85 cases, and through right thoracotomy in 27 cases. The results were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: All of the 112 CEGA operations were successfully performed on the patients who underwent esophageal resections, and no operative mortality and anastomotic leakage occurred. Excluding the two patients with the anastomotic recurrent carcinoma, anastomotic stricture occurred in 12 cases (10.9%, n=110). Median time to the presentation of anastomotic stricture was 4.3 months (range 2.6-25.3 months), and the median number of dilatations was 3 (range 1-5). When divided into the 24 and 26 mm groups, the respective incidences of stricture were 12.3 (7/57) and 9.4% (5/53), respectively, and the statistical results of the two sizes of staplers were essentially the same (P=0.6691). Eight patients experienced nonanastomotic-related complications (7.3%, n=110), in which there were three cases of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, four cases of the left side pneumothorax, and one case of perforation of the proximal stomach. There was also a case of stapling gauze at anastomosis. Some of the complications were closely related to the initially improper use of the new stapler's craft. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that CEGA using the new circular stapling device in surgery of the esophageal carcinoma is a very effective procedure to improve the anastomotic technique from a traditional hand-sewn anastomosis to a stapled anastomosis and can reduce the incidence of complications.     

Mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer

AIM: Fibrous stenosis of the esophagogastric cervical anastomosis remains a significant complication occurring in up to one third of cases. Trying to reduce the incidence of this complication, we describe our technique of cervical esophago-gastric anastomosis using endoscopic linear stapler which seems to reduce the incidence of fibrous stricture formation after resection of esophageal cancer. METHODS: Between March 2000 and December 2004, 34 patients (20 males and 14 females) underwent esophagectomy using tubulized stomach for reconstruction. Mean age was 57 years. Eight patients with advanced stage (5 T3 and 3 T4) underwent induction chemotherapy. The most of patients was affected by squamous cell carcinoma. In all cases we performed cervical esophagogastric anastomosis using linear endoscopic stapler. The occurrence of postoperative anastomotic leak and development of anastomotic stricture were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: All patients survived esophagectomy and 30 of them (88%) were available for postoperative follow-up at 6 months. Anastomotic leak developed in 1 case. No patient developed fibrous stenosis that required dilatation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Complete mechanical esophago-gastric anastomosis, using endoscopic linear stapler is effective and safe, even when a narrow gastric tube is used as esophageal substitute. These technique seems superior to other techniques to reduce the incidence of postoperative anastomotic complications.     

Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophageal resection and gastric tube reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial comparing sutured neck anastomosis with stapled intrathoracic anastomosis

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to compare in prospective randomized fashion a manually sutured esophagogastric anastomosis in the neck and a stapled in the chest after esophageal resection and gastric tube reconstruction. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Despite the fact that all reconstructions after esophagectomy will result in a cervical or a thoracic anastomosis, controversy still exists as to the optimal site for the anastomosis. In uncontrolled studies, both neck and chest anastomoses have been advocated. The only reported randomized study is difficult to evaluate because of varying routes of the substitute and different anastomotic techniques within the groups. The reported high failure rate of stapled anastomoses in the neck and the fact that most surgeons prefer to suture cervical anastomoses made us choose this technique for anastomosis in the neck. Our routine and the preference of most surgeons to staple high thoracic anastomoses became decisive for type of thoracic anastomoses. METHODS: Between May 9, 1990 and February 5, 1996, 83 patients undergoing esophageal resection were prospectively randomized to receive an esophagogastric anastomosis in the neck (41 patients) or an esophagogastric anastomosis in the chest (42 patients). To evaluate selection bias, patients undergoing esophageal resection during the same period but not randomized (n = 29) were also followed and compared with those in the study (n = 83). Objective measurements of anastomotic level and diameter were assessed with an endoscope and balloon catheter 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The long-term survival rates were compared with the log-rank test. RESULTS: Two patients (1.8%) died in hospital, and the remaining 110 patients were followed until death or for a minimum of 60 months. The genuine 5-year survival rate was 29% for chest anastomoses and 30% for neck anastomoses. The overall leakage rate was 1.8% (2 cases of 112) with no relation to mortality or anastomotic method. All patients in the randomized group had tumor-free proximal and distal resection lines, but 1 patient in the nonrandomized group had tumor infiltrates in the proximal resection margin. At 3, 6, and 12 months after operation, there was no difference in anastomotic diameter between the esophagogastric anastomosis in the neck and in the thorax (P = 0.771), and both increased with time (P = 0.004, ANOVA repeated measures). Body weight development was the same in the two groups. With similar results in randomized and nonrandomized patients, study bias was eliminated. CONCLUSIONS: When performed in a standardized way, neck and chest anastomoses after esophageal resection are equally safe. The additional esophageal resection of 5 cm in the neck group did not increase tumor removal and survival; on the other hand, it did not adversely influence morbidity, anastomotic diameter, or eating as reflected by body weight development.     

Factors affecting leakage following esophageal anastomosis

Esophageal anastomotic leaks remain the most serious problem following extirpative procedures for esophageal carcinoma. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 352 patients with carcinoma in the thoracic esophagus who had undergone esophageal anastomosis following esophagectomy at the Kurume University Hospital between 1981 and 1990. Of these, 94 patients (27%) developed anastomotic leaks, and out of this subgroup, 21 (6%) died as a direct result of the leak. A further 20 patients (6%) underwent repair of the leak, after which they were able to tolerate oral intake. The anastomotic leak healed spontaneously in the other 53 patients (15%). The risk factors predisposing to leaks from esophageal anastomoses were determined as: (1) the anastomosis being performed via a retrosternal or subcutaneous route as opposed to an intrathoracic route, (2) the use of colonic interposition as opposed to a gastric pedicle, (3) performing a manual anastomosis as opposed to a mechanical anastomosis, and (4) employing an end-to-end anastomosis, as opposed to an end-to-side anastomosis, using a mechanical method. By introducing an anastomotic stapling device, a microvascular technique, a staged operation based on the preoperative risk analysis, and improvement in pre- and postoperative management, the incidence of anastomotic leakage could be decreased from 35% to 14%, and that of consequent hospital mortality, from 9% to 2%.     

Transhiatal esophagectomy for benign disease

Transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy has been performed in 65 adult patients with dysphagia from benign esophageal disease: strictures (30), neuromotor dysfunction (24), acute iatrogenic perforation (five), acute caustic injury (four), and recurrent gastroesophageal reflux (two). Nearly 70% (45) had undergone at least one prior esophageal operation, and 26% (17) had a history of between two and four esophageal operations. The esophagus was replaced with stomach in 53 patients (82%), colon being used only when there was a history of either prior gastric resection or caustic injury to the stomach (10 patients). Intraoperative blood loss averaged 1,050 ml. Intraoperative complications included pneumothorax in 38 patients (58%) and a tracheal laceration in one patient. Postoperative complications included transient recurrent laryngeal nerve paresis (11 patients, 17%), chylothorax (four patients, 6%), anastomotic leak (four patients, 6%), and small bowel obstruction (two patients). There were five hospital deaths (8% mortality), none related to the technique of esophagectomy. Follow-up ranges from 1 to 84 months (average 28 months). Of 46 patients with a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in the original esophageal bed, 42 have had an excellent functional result although 17 have required at least one postoperative esophageal dilation. Two have developed true anastomotic strictures. Clinically significant gastroesophageal reflux has not occurred. Transhiatal esophagectomy for benign disease is feasible and safe, even after multiple previous esophageal operations. The stomach appears to be a better visceral esophageal substitute than colon, because it allows an initially easier technical operation and superior long-term functional results.     

Complete mechanical cervical anastomosis using a narrow gastric tube after esophagectomy for cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Fibrous stenosis of the esophagogastric cervical anastomosis remains a significant complication occurring in up to one-third of cases. Trying to reduce the incidence of this complication, we describe our technique of cervical esophagogastric anastomosis using endoscopic linear stapler which seems to reduce the incidence of fibrous stricture formation after resection of esophageal cancer. METHODS: Between March 2000 and June 2003, 26 patients (15 males and 11 females) underwent esophagectomy using tubulized stomach for reconstruction. Cervical esophagogastric anastomosis using linear endoscopic stapler was performed in all cases. The occurrence of post-operative anastomotic leak and development of anastomotic stricture were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: All patients survived esophagectomy and were available for post-operative follow-up. Anastomotic leak developed in one case. No patient developed fibrous stenosis that required dilatation therapy. CONCLUSION: Complete mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis, using endoscopic linear stapler is effective and safe, even when a narrow gastric tube is used as esophageal substitute. This technique seems superior to other techniques to reduce the incidence of post-operative anastomotic complications.     

Additional microvascular anastomosis in reconstruction after total esophagectomy for cervical esophageal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Maintaining sufficient blood flow to the substitute organ after total esophagectomy is essential for decreasing the risk of anastomotic leakage. Additional venous, or arterial and venous, anastomoses between the vessels of the gastric tube and the vessels in the neck after total esophagectomy are described for 11 patients with cervical esophageal carcinoma. METHODS: The tissue blood flow was measured by laser Doppler flowmetry before and after anastomosis. Venous anastomosis was performed for all 11 patients, and arterial anastomosis was added for 7 patients. RESULTS: A significant increase in tissue blood flow was observed after venous anastomosis alone (mean, 19%; P < 0.05) and after arterial and venous anastomoses (mean 43%; P < 0.01). There was no anastomotic leakage or hospital death. CONCLUSIONS: This procedure may reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage especially in the case of pharyngogastrostomy following total esophagectomy.     

Transhiatal esophagectomy for treatment of benign and malignant esophageal disease

Since our initial 1978 report, we have performed transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) in 1085 patients with intrathoracic esophageal disease: 285 (26%) benign lesions and 800 (74%) malignant lesions (4.5% upper, 22% middle, and 73.5% lower third/cardia). THE was possible in 97% of patients in whom it was attempted; reconstruction was performed at the same operation in all but six patients. The esophageal substitute was positioned in the original esophageal bed in 98%, stomach being used in 782 patients (96%) and colon in those with a prior gastric resection. Hospital mortality was 4%, with three deaths due to uncontrollable intraoperative hemorrhage. Major complications included anastomotic leak (13%), atelectasis/pneumonia prolonging hospitalization (2%), recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis, chylothorax, and tracheal laceration (< 1% each). There were five reoperations for mediastinal bleeding within 24 hours of THE. Intraoperative blood loss averaged 689 ml. Altogether, 78% of the patients had no postoperative complications. Actuarial survival of the cancer patients mirrors that reported after transthoracic esophagectomy. Late functional results are good or excellent in 80%. Approximately 50% have required one or more anastomotic dilatations. With intensive preadmission pulmonary and physical conditioning, use of a side-to-side staple technique (which has reduced the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak rate to less than 3%), and postoperative epidural anesthesia, the need for an intensive care unit stay has been eliminated and the length of hospital stay was reduced to 7 days. We concluded that THE can be achieved in most patients requiring esophageal resection for benign and malignant disease and with greater safety and less morbidity than the traditional transthoracic approaches.     

机械吻合在食管外科中的应用：1605例经验总结

１９８０年８月至１９９４年２月应用机械方法对１６０５例食管癌和贲门癌切除后进行吻合。男１２８１例，女３２４例。年龄２８～８１岁，其中５０～６９岁１１８４例（７３．８％）。食管癌１０４４例，贲门癌５６１例。食管胃颈部吻合３５例；超胸顶吻合５８例；弓上吻合８３５例；弓下吻合６７７例。术后发生吻合口瘘１６例（ｌ％），其中颈部吻合口瘘发生率１４．３％（５／３５）；胸内吻合口瘘发生率０．７％（１１／１５７０），前６年胸内吻合口瘘发生率１．４％（８／５７５），近８年胸内吻合口瘘发生率０．３％（３／９９５）。术后发生吻合口狭窄１６例（１％），狭窄明显者经扩张后均恢复正常饮食。作者认为：机械吻合是减少胸内吻合口瘘的有效方法之一。     

应用消化道吻合器在食管胃颈部吻合的体会

１９８８年１０月至１９９５年２月应用消化道吻合器对１８８例食管癌切除后病人行颈部吻合，并以机械吻合方法代替传统手工操作。吻合无失败者。术后吻合口瘘发生率１６％（３／１８８），吻合口狭窄２１％（４／１８８）。无吻合口出血，无手术死亡病例。作者认为，颈部机械吻合方法操作简单，易于掌握，吻合可靠，缩短了手术时间，减少了术后并发症的发生。     

吲哚菁绿荧光成像在胸腔镜食管癌手术中的应用

目的评价吲哚菁绿(ICG)荧光成像在胸腔镜食管癌手术中应用的价值。 方法随机选取32例食管癌患者作为实验组,在胸腔镜手术中利用ICG荧光成像技术,判断管状胃血液灌注情况,选择灌注良好的区域完成吻合。术后根据临床症状和影像学来判定吻合口漏是否发生,并记录吻合口瘘发生情况。同期选取38例常规手术组食管癌患者作为对照组。 结果全组未出现由于注射ICG而引起的死亡等不良反应。所有患者采用经纵隔途径食管胃颈部吻合方式。器械吻合52例(实验组24例,对照组28例);手工吻合18例(实验组8例,对照组10例),两组患者的吻合方式无统计学差异(P>0.05)。临床症状和影像学证实的吻合口漏共7例,其中实验组2例(6.25%),显著低于同期不用此项技术的对照组5例(13.15%)。 结论ICG荧光素成像是一种安全可行的技术,术中通过一个可视化的效果,评估管状胃的血流灌注情况,有助于降低食管癌手术后吻合口瘘的发生。     

Collare Anastomosenstenosen nach Magenhochzug beim Ösophaguskarzinom

Common late complications after esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction for esophageal carcinoma are symptomatic, benign fibrotic stenoses of the cervical anastomosis, which require dilatation. Since the prognosis of esophageal carcinoma still remains poor, bad functional results such as dysphagia affect quality of life. In a retrospective analysis, our patients were evaluated with regard to the underlying effects of cervical anastomotic stenosis after esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction. From 1 January 1989 to 31 July 1995, 173 patients with carcinoma of the esophagus were operated in our institution. Transhiatal esophageal dissection was performed in 133 patients; 40 patients underwent transthoracic en bloc resection. The 30-day mortality rate was 7.5% (13 patients). Postoperative fibrotic stenosis of the cervical anastomosis requiring dilatation occurred in 36.4% (63 patients) 6–12 weeks after operation. Fibrotic stenosis of the cervical anastomosis did not develop in 97 patients. There was a significant difference concerning the incidence of anastomotic leaks within both groups: whereas in 23.8% of the 63 patients who developed a fibrotic stricture of the cervical anastomosis an anastomotic leak preceded this event (P<0.001), no anastomotic leak occurred in the group of 97 patients with normal healing of the cervical anastomosis. In addition, significantly (P<0.01) more patients (37.5%,n=23) with preexisting diabetes mellitus could be found among the 63 patients who developed a fibrotic stricture of the cervical anastomosis, in contrast to the 97 patients without anastomotic stenosis.     

Esophagectomy: Definitive Treatment for Esophageal Neuromotor Dysfunction

Twenty-two patients with a history of between one and four (average of two) unsuccessful prior esophageal operations for neuromotor dysfunction were treated with esophageal resection and replacement. Eleven (50%) had recurrent reflux esophagitis in association with various disorders of motility: esophageal spasm in 4, achalasia in 3, scleroderma in 2, and esophageal atresia in 2. Eight (36%) had primary esophageal spasm and 3 (14%) had achalasia. Esophageal obstruction, regurgitation, and severe spasm were the most common manifestations of the inability to swallow normally. Transthoracic or transhiatal (blunt) esophagectomies were performed in 5 and 17 patients, respectively. The stomach, with a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis, was used for esophageal substitution in 15 patients. Six patients underwent a long-segment colonic interposition, and 1 patient with achalasia underwent a distal esophagectomy and short-segment colonic interposition. One patient undergoing transthoracic esophagectomy for achalasia died from unrecognized intraoperative bleeding into the opposite chest. There were no other operative deaths. Additional complications included transient hoarseness in 8 patients, chylothorax in 1, and anastomotic leak in 1. After an average follow-up of 25 months for the 21 surviving patients, ability to eat is regarded as good in 18 (85%), fair in 1 (5%), and poor in 2 (10%).In patients with incapacitating esophageal neuromotor disease, a more radical operative approach—esophagectomy—may be safer and more reliable than attempting another procedure and risking another failure. Esophagectomy ensures definitive elimination of the esophageal problem and as optimal an ability to eat as possible. Our experience suggests that the stomach, with a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis, offers a better functional esophageal substitute than does a colonic interposition.     

磁压榨技术用于食管吻合重建的实验研究

目的探讨基于磁压榨技术设计的磁吻合环在食管吻合重建中的可行性。方法根据SD大鼠食管解剖特点自行设计食管磁吻合环。以SD大鼠为动物模型(n=10,雌雄各半),利用磁吻合环完成颈段食管的磁吻合重建,记录手术操作时间、动物生存情况、术后并发症、磁环排出时间等。术后2周处死动物,获取食管吻合口标本,测量吻合口爆破压、肉眼观察吻合口形成情况。结果对10只SD大鼠均成功实施了食管磁吻合重建,中位吻合时间11(8～13)min,术后所有大鼠均存活良好,未见吻合口瘘、吻合口狭窄、磁环崁顿等。磁环中位排出时间为8(5～10)d。吻合口爆破压300 mm Hg以上。肉眼观察吻合口肌层愈合良好,黏膜层光滑平整。结论磁压榨技术可用于食管吻合重建,具有操作简单、吻合效果可靠等优点,具有临床应用前景。     

Clinical Application of Mucosal Valve Technique for Anastomosis During Esophagogastrostomy

Background

The study aims to compare the efficacy in prevention of anastomotic complications using layer-to-layer mucosal valve technique versus circular stapled technique for esophagogastric intrathoracic anastomosis after resection for esophageal and gastric cardiac carcinoma.

Methods

From January 2005 to December 2010, 136 patients received layer-to-layer mucosal valve technique (LM group), 219 received circular stapled anastomosis (CS group) after curative intent resection for esophageal and gastric cardiac carcinoma. The technique details were reported and the clinical results were analyzed.

Results

The two groups were comparable on clinical baseline characteristics. The average duration of operation was longer with LM technique by 16 min, but without statistical significance (P?=?0.073). There was no anastomotic leakage in the LM group, while in the CS group, leakage occurred in seven patients (3.2 %, P?=?0.047). Both the incidence and grade of postoperative dysphagia were significantly lower in the LM group (P?<?0.05). Significantly fewer patients experienced stricture after LM technique (3.8 %) compared with CS anastomosis (18.2 %, P?<?0.001). CS anastomosis was associated with a significantly higher incidence of persistent stricture requiring more dilatation (P?<?0.001). Symptoms of reflux were better controlled by LM technique; 82.7 % of patients were asymptomatic with respect to reflux compared to 58.9 % in the CS group, P?<?0.001. And there was a significant reduction in the incidence of esophagitis in remnant esophagus in the LM group (P?=?0.001).

Conclusions

The layered mucosal valve anastomosis could significantly diminish the incidence of anastomotic complications and could be used as an alternative for esophagogastric anastomosis after resection of esophageal and gastric cardiac carcinoma.     

Clinical Application of Layered Anastomosis During Esophagogastrostomy

The aim of this study was to compare the operative results in regard to reducing anastomotic leakage and stricture formation using a newly designed layered manual esophagogastric anastomosis versus a stapler esophagogastrostomy versus the conventional hand-sewn whole-layer anastomosis after resection for esophageal or gastric cardiac carcinoma. From January 2004 to September 2006, a total of 1024 patients with esophageal or gastric cardia carcinoma underwent a layered esophagogastric anastomosis with the assistance of a three-leaf clipper in a single university medical center. The mucosal layers of the esophagus and stomach were sutured continuously with 4/0 Vicryl plus antibacterial suture (polyglyconate). From May 2002 to December 2003, there were also 170 patients and 69 patients who underwent stapler and conventional whole-layer anastomosis, respectively; they served as control groups. The results were analyzed retrospectively. The operative mortality rate was 0.7% in the layered group compared to 5.9% and 7.2% for the stapler group and the whole-layer group (p < 0.01), The anastomotic leakage rates were 0%, 3.5%, and 5.8% for the layered group, stapler group, and whole-layer group, respectively (p < 0.01). All patients were followed postoperatively. Six patients in the layered group (0.6%) developed mild stricture formation compared to 16 patients in stapled group (9.9%) and 5 patients in the conventional whole-layer group (7.8%) (p < 0.01). The application of layered esophagogastric anastomosis could reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage and stricture after esophagectomy compared with the stapler and whole-layer manual anastomoses. It is easy to apply and could be used as an alternative for esophagogastric anastomosis after resection for esophageal or cardiac carcinoma. This abstract was accepted as a free paper and oral presentation at International Surgical Week 2007, Abstract 320, Montreal, Canada, August 2007     

Antethoracic Pedicled Jejunum Reconstruction with the Supercharge Technique for Esophageal Cancer

Background

Gastric tube is the first choice as an esophageal substitute for reconstruction after esophagectomy. Colon or jejunum is selected for patients in whom stomach cannot be used. Colon interposition is reported to have a high incidence of anastomotic leakage and mortality. For safer surgical treatment, the authors adopted supercharged pedicle jejunum reconstruction as the operation of choice in patients with esophageal cancer who had no stomach to use as an esophageal substitute. The aim of this study was to review our experience with this technique.

Methods

From 2003 to 2009, esophagectomy and antethoracic pedicled jejunum reconstruction with the supercharge technique was performed in 27 patients with esophageal cancer at the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Hospital. Medical records of these 27 patients were retrospectively reviewed to determine demographic data, diagnosis, functional results, and perioperative course.

Results

Median operating time, blood loss, hospital stay, and duration of enteral feeding were 636?min (range 454–856 min), 580?ml (range 208–1959?ml), 27?days (range 16–72?days), and 80?days (range 26–1740?days), respectively. There were no in-hospital deaths. Anastomotic leakage occurred in two patients and was successfully managed conservatively. In 2 of 27 patients, the pedicled jejunum was of insufficient length, and additional procedures were needed to complete the anastomosis.

Conclusions

Although antethoracic pedicled jejunum reconstruction with the supercharge technique is technically demanding, it is a reliable technique and contributes to successful reconstruction after esophagectomy for patients in whom stomach is not available for reconstruction.     

Cervical esophagogastric anastomosis for benign disease. Functional results

Ninety-one adult patients (average age 49 years) with various benign esophageal disorders treated by total thoracic esophagectomy and a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis have been followed up with personal interviews and examinations from 6 to 104 months (average 34 months). Outpatient esophageal dilation has been used liberally for any degree of postoperative cervical dysphagia. At their latest follow-up, 39 patients (43%) eat without dysphagia; four patients (4%) have mild dysphagia necessitating no treatment; 34 patients (37%) have undergone one to three dilations during the first 6 to 12 postoperative months for intermittent dysphagia; and 14 patients (16%) have more severe dysphagia necessitating regular anastomotic dilations (two thirds of these perform home self-dilations). Mild regurgitation of gastric contents has been experienced by 27 (30%), particularly when recumbent after eating, but only four patients sleep with the head of the bed elevated to prevent nocturnal regurgitation. No patient has had pulmonary complications resulting from aspiration. Twenty patients (22%) have had varying degrees of "dumping syndrome," generally transient and well controlled with medication. Two patients have required an additional gastric drainage operation 16 months and 82 months, respectively, after the esophagectomy. At their latest evaluation, 33% of the patients weigh 3 to 83 (average 19) pounds more than they weighed preoperatively, 38% weigh 5 to 40 (average 12) pounds less, and 29% have had no change in their weight. The stomach functions well as a visceral esophageal substitute and, like the esophagus, is more thick-walled and resilient than colon. Significant gastroesophageal reflux is uncommon after a properly performed cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. Postoperative dysphagia can be minimized by attention to technique in constructing the anastomosis. These data support our belief that the stomach is the preferred organ for esophageal replacement, not only for carcinoma, but also for benign diseases as well.     

食管癌贲门癌术后吻合口及胸胃瘘的临床分析

目的　探讨食管癌、贲门癌切除术后吻合口及胸胃瘘发生的高危因素及防治措施。方法　分析 1990年 1月～ 2 0 0 3年 12月间 136 9例行食管癌、贲门癌切除、食管重建术病人的临床资料。结果　本组颈部吻合口瘘的发生率为 16 .2 4 %。胸内吻合口及胃瘘发生率为 2 .0 % ,死亡率2 8.0 % ;前 6年和近 7年相比 ,胸内瘘的发生率为 3.33%对 1.4 6 % (P =0 .0 31)。胸内机械吻合瘘的发生率为 0 .5 1%。结论　吻合口瘘及胸胃瘘是食管重建术后严重的并发症 ,应用机械吻合、熟练掌握手术技巧和加强围术期管理是预防瘘发生的有效方法     

Correction of esophageal atresia with distal tracheoesophageal fistula

Correction of the full spectrum of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) remains controversial. Circular myotomy and other lengthening procedures have shown promise to reduce tension when a relatively wide gap exists between esophageal segments; nevertheless a relatively high complication rate persists. We believe anastomotic tension is commonly found with repair of this anomaly. Therefore, the construction of the anastomosis will be a primary determinant of success. Twenty-four infants with TEF were admitted, 12 (50%) weighing 2.5 kg, nine (37%) 1.8 to 2.5 kg, and three (13%) 1.8 kg. All underwent gastrostomy and end-to-end single-layer anastomosis. Gaps of up to 4.5 cm were encountered, and in one case a cervical incision was necessary for mobilization of the upper pouch. For eight patients (33%) the gap was at least 2.5 cm and significant anastomotic tension was generated. For the series, there were no anastomotic leaks (all confirmed by barium swallow), reoperations, or surgical complications (there were two late, unrelated deaths). Prophylactic dilation was routinely performed 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively. Subsequently, seven of the 24 (29%) required additional (one to five) dilatations but are now asymptomatic at least 2 years later. Follow-up for the entire series is 5 months to 5 years. Three infants (13%) required fundoplication for reflux without stricture and two infants (8%) an aortopexy. For successful esophageal anastomosis we consider the following technical points important: (1) no-touch technique to minimize tissue damage, (2) generous (5 to 7 mm) full-thickness suture depth, (3) fine (6/0) monofilament suture to reduce tissue reactivity, and (4) in cases of significant tension, the sutures are preplaced and used to provide traction to eliminate tension during tying. Tension is often unavoidable in TEF, yet a carefully constructed anastomosis will withstand this stress. This approach provides results at least as satisfactory as the reported experience with a variety of techniques.