Cardioversion Related Thromboembolism: Value of Transesophageal Echocardiography to Guide Cardioversion in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

The aim of this article is to review two recent investigations of the value of transesophageal echocardiography to guide direct current cardioversion in different patient populations. In the Ludwigshafener Observational Cardioversion Study (LOCS) a TEE was performed prior to electrical cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation who had been receiving oral anticoagulation adjusted to an international normalized ratio of 2 to 3 for at least three weeks. In contrast, the ACUTE study investigated the value of transesophageal echocardiography in patients with atrial fibrillation in whom long-term oral anticoagulants had not been initiated in comparison to standard anticoagulation therapy. Furthermore, the following questions in respect to anticoagulation therapy are addressed: (1) how should patients be approached for pharmacological or spontaneous conversion; (2) how to treat emergency situations, (3) what is the importance of the postcardioversion period and long-term anticoagulation therapy; and (4) what is the role of low molecular weight heparin in the pericardioversion period.     

Early Reinitiation of Atrial Fibrillation Following External Electrical Cardioversion in Amiodarone-Treated Patients

Early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation (ERAF) following external or internal electrical cardioversion is one of the factors determining unsuccessful electrical cardioversion. Prevention of ERAF has not been studied systematically in patients on amiodarone therapy. Methods and Results: 22 patients had ERAF within 1[emsp4 ]min after external electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. 11 patients were on amiodarone therapy and 11 patients had no antiarrhythmic medication. The effect of atropine, post-shock atrial pacing and intravenous ajmaline on ERAF was consecutively tested in these patients. Administration of atropine before repeated defibrillation or post-shock atrial pacing prevented ERAF in 9 of the 11 patients (82%) on amiodarone therapy but in only 3 of 11 patients (27%) without amiodarone (p<0.05). In the remaining patients, intravenous ajmaline was effective in the suppression of ERAF in 5 patients without amiodarone and in 1 patient with amiodarone. The PP interval preceding the atrial premature beat reinitiating atrial fibrillation was nonsignificantly longer in amiodarone-treated patients (1127±419[emsp4 ]ms) in comparison to patients without amiodarone (896±271[emsp4 ]ms). 27% of patients without amiodarone at the time of electrical cardioversion and 55% of patients with amiodarone remained in sinus rhythm during the follow-up of 29±14 and 30±14 months, respectively. Conclusions: ERAF in patients on amiodarone can be treated by atropine or atrial pacing to prevent bradycardia-dependent ERAF. ERAF in amiodarone-treated patients does not apparently predict late recurrence of atrial fibrillation on continued amiodarone therapy.     

An Update on Electrical Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is the most frequently encountered sustained arrhythmia in clinical practice. Electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation using damped sine wave shocks has been a mainstay of therapy for nearly 4 decades; its limitation remains a failure rate that approaches 20%. Although several alternatives have been proposed, including delivering 720 J shocks using dual monophasic defibrillators, ibutilide pretreatment and internal cardioversion, each of these approaches has significant limitations, which preclude its routine use. Recent data demonstrate that routine use of biphasic shocks for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation is associated with a marked improvement in cardioversion efficacy and suggest that biphasic shocks may be the preferred method for the transthoracic electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.     

Atrial Mechanical Function Before and After Electrical or Amiodarone Cardioversion in Atrial Fibrillation: Assessment by Transesophageal Echocardiography and Pulsed Doppler

In some patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), it has been suggested that left atrial mechanical dysfunction can develop after successful electrical cardioversion, justifying postcardioversion anticoagulant treatment. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in left atrial appendage peak flow velocities and the incidence of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in patients with AF before and after electrical cardioversion or intravenous amiodarone, studied using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and pulsed Doppler. We performed a control TEE in 7 patients in the electrical group and 6 in the amiodarone group, with no significant clinical differences between both groups. A second TEE was performed immediately in the 7 patients with successful electrical cardioversion. The peak flow velocities in the appendage before and after the procedure were: filling 43.3 ± 22 vs 27.7 ± 28 cm/sec (P = 0.01) and emptying 35.5 ± 22 vs 23.6 ± 17 cm/sec (P = 0.01), respectively. The spontaneous echo contrast increased in 4 of the 7 patients. In 4 patients of the amiodarone group, the peak flow velocities in the appendage during AF and within the first 24 hours after restoration of sinus rhythm were: filling 37.4 ± 12 vs 37.8 ± 18 cm/sec and emptying 36.4 ± 18 vs 35.9 ± 18 cm/sec, respectively (P = NS). There was no change in spontaneous echo contrast. In conclusion, patients with AF reverted to sinus rhythm using amiodarone did not show changes in left atrial mechanical function; however, patients with electrical cardioversion showed mechanical dysfunction. Further investigations on the effects of amiodarone and other drugs on the mechanical function of the atria are needed to determine if patients reverted pharmacologically require antico-agulation post reversion.     

Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm after Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Lone Atrial Fibrillation and Patients with Hypertension

Background: The success rate and prognosis of cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with organic heart disease is well known. In contrast, little data exist about cardioversion success and maintenance of sinus rhythm (SR) in patients with lone AF and in patients with hypertension as the only underlying cardiovascular disease. Methods: In a prospective cardioversion registry 148 of 181 patients (81.8%) with lone AF (age 58 ± 13 years, duration of AF 7.6 ± 19 weeks) and 120 of 148 patients (81.1%) with hypertension (age 62 ± 10 years, duration of AF 6.6 ± 21 weeks) had successful cardioversion and were followed for 7.7 ± 1.9 months. Results: At follow-up, 120 patients (81.1%) with lone AF were in SR, and 18 of these patients had had repeated cardioversion during follow-up (AF total recurrence rate 31.1%). In stepwise regression analysis, the number of previous cardioversions was predictive of rhythm at follow-up (P = 0.0453). Rhythm at follow-up did not differ between patients who were or were not on antiarrhythmic drugs. At follow-up 96 patients (80%) with hypertension were in SR, and 9 of these had had repeated cardioversion during follow-up (AF total recurrence rate 27.5%). As in lone AF, the recurrence rate of AF did not differ between patients with or without antiarrhythmic drug treatment, and in multivariate regression analysis, the number of previous cardioversions was the only clinical predictor of rhythm at follow-up (P = 0.0284). Conclusions: Even in patients with such benign conditions as lone AF or hypertension as the only underlying disease, the prognosis of cardioversion in terms of maintenance of SR is poor. Future studies of rhythm control versus rate control need to include not only patients with organic heart disease but also patients with lone AF and patients with hypertension, since the long-term benefits of these two strategies remain unclear even in these subsets of patients.     

Evaluation of Atrial Refractoriness and Atrial Fibrillation Inducibility Immediately after Internal Cardioversion in Patients with Chronic Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Summary. Objective: To prospectively evaluate right atrial refractoriness and sustained atrial fibrillation (AF) inducibility at programmed electrical stimulation in two groups of patient: a series of patients with chronic persistent AF, studied immediately after successful low energy internal atrial cardioversion, and a group of control patients without history of supraventricular arrhythmias.Patients: Nineteen patients with chronic persistent AF (mean AF duration 11 ± 10 months, range 2–61 months) submitted to successful internal low energy atrial cardioversion in fully conscious state and 11 control patients without history of supraventricular arrhythmias.Methods: An electrophysiological evaluation was performed to measure atrial refractoriness and AF inducibility, by delivering single atrial extrastimuli in high right atrium, at decremental coupling, during spontaneous sinus rhythm and after 8 beats at 600, 500, 400 and 330 ms cycle length. If sustained AF was induced the protocol was terminated.Results: During programmed atrial stimulation sustained AF was induced in 8 out 19 (42%) of the AF patients but in none of the control group. Atrial effective refractory period was significantly shorter in AF patients compared to controls both at basic cycle length, at 600 ms, 500 ms and 400 ms cycle length, meanwhile no statistically significant differences were found at 330 ms cycle length. An altered relationship between atrial effective refractory period and cycle length was found in AF patients compared to controls: the slope of linear correlation slope was significantly lower in AF group than in controls (0.04 ± 0.07 vs 0.17 ± 0.10, p < 0.002).Conclusions: Marked abnormalities of atrial refractoriness and of its heart rate relationship are observed after internal cardioversion of chronic persistent AF in humans and these abnormalities are associated with an high vulnerability to AF. These observations may explain the high risk of AF recurrences in the early phases following successful cardioversion. In this scenario antiarrhythmic drug therapy seems to be mandatory for reducing arrhythmia relapses.     

Outcomes in Patients Requiring Cardioversion Following Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Outcomes of Cardioversion Post AF Ablation.   Introduction: Early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias is commonly noted after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The long-term outcomes of patients who require cardioversion for persistent AF after AF ablation is not known. This study reports the outcomes of patients who underwent cardioversion for persistent AF or atrial flutter following an AF ablation procedure.
Methods: The patient population comprised 55 patients (mean age 58 ± 10 years, 35% paroxysmal) who underwent catheter ablation of AF and subsequently required electrical cardioversion for persistent AF (45 patients) or atrial flutter (10 patients). Cardioversion was defined as early (within 90 days of the ablation procedure) or late (between 90 and 180 days following ablation).
Results: The mean follow-up duration was 15 ± 8 months. Forty-six of the 55 patients (84%) patients experienced recurrence during follow-up. The average time to recurrence after cardioversion was 37 days. Of the 55 patients, 8 (15%) patients had a complete success, 11 (20%) patients had a partial success and 36 patients (65%) had a failed outcome. Seven of the 43 patients (16%) who underwent early cardioversion had a complete success as opposed to one of 12 patients (8%) who underwent late cardioversion (P = 0.49).
Conclusions: This study shows that >80% of patients who undergo cardioversion for persistent AF or atrial flutter after AF ablation have recurrence. The timing of cardioversion did not affect the outcome. These findings allow clinicians to provide realistic expectations to patients regarding the long-term outcome and/or requirement for a second ablation procedure. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 27–32, January 2010)     

Low-Energy Transvenous Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation Using a Single Atrial Lead System

Atrial Cardioversion Using a Single Atrial Lead System. Introduction: Clinical studies have shown that electrical conversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) is feasible with transvenous catheter electrodes at low energies. We developed a single atrial lead system that allows atrial pacing, sensing, and defibrillation to improve and facilitate this new therapeutic option. Methods and Results: The lead consists of a tripolar sensing, pacing, and defibrillation system. Two defibrillation coil electrodes are positioned on a stylet-guided lead. A ring electrode located between the two coils serves as the cathode for atrial sensing and pacing. We used this lead to cardiovert patients with acute or chronic AE. The distal coil was positioned in the coronary sinus, and the proximal coil and the ring electrode in the right atrium. R wave synchronized biphasic shocks were delivered between the two coils. Atrial signal detection and pacing were performed using the proximal coil and the ring electrode. Eight patients with acute AF (38 ± 9 min) and eight patients with chronic AF (6.6 ± 5 months) were included. The fluoroscopy time for lead placement was 3.5 ± 4.3 minutes. The atrial defibrillation threshold was 2.0 ± 1.4 J for patients with acute AE and 9.2 ± 5.9 J for patients with chronic AF (P < 0.01). The signal amplitude detected was 1.7 ± 1.1 mV during AF and 4.0 ± 2.9 mV after restoration of sinus rhythm (P < 0.001). Atrial pacing was feasible at a threshold of 4.4 ± 3.3 V (0.5-msec pulse width). Conclusions: Atrial signal detection, atrial pacing, and low-energy atrial defibrillation using this single atrial lead system is feasible in various clinical settings. Tbis system might lead to a simpler, less invasive approach for internal atrial cardioversion.     

Prospective Randomized Trial of External Versus Internal Transcatheter Cardioversion in Patients with Chronic Atrial Fibrillation

To evaluate the safety and long-term efficacy of internal transcatheter cardioversion, forty patients with chronic, lone atrial fibrillation were studied. The patients were randomised to internal transcatheter cardioversion or to conventional external cardioversion. In cases where the procedure was unsuccessful, cross-over to the alternate method was performed. Oral anticoagulation therapy was started three weeks prior to the procedure and was maintained for another three weeks following successful cardioversion.Sinus rhythm was restored in 16/18 patients (88%) in the internal cardioversion group, versus 9/22 patients (40%) in the external cardioversion group (p < 0.01). In addition, 8/13 (61%) patients who were crossed-over to internal cardioversion were successfully cardioverted to sinus rhythm. In contrast, both patients who were crossed-over to external cardioversion remained in atrial fibrillation.During a mean follow-up period of 23 months, 13 (39.3%) patients maintained sinus rhythm. Using the intention to treat principle, the recurrence rate was not statistically different between the two methods.It is concluded that internal cardioversion is more effective in acutely restoring sinus rhythm compared to external cardioversion. However, both methods have similar long-term recurrence rates.     

Internal Cardioversion of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Using Rectilinear Biphasic Waveform

Internal electrical cardioversion is currently used in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation resistant to external electrical cardioversion. In external cardioversion, biphasic waveforms have shown a greater efficacy than monomorphic waveforms. The present study aimed to test the safety and efficacy of rectilinear biphasic waveform in converting patients with persistent atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm using internal electrical cardioversion, and to compare it with that of classical monophasic waveform. Twenty-seven consecutive patients with persistent AF received 31 internal cardioversions, using monophasic waveform in 11 (group I), and rectilinear biphasic waveform in 20 cases (group II). Baseline patients characteristics were similar in both groups. Multipolar catheters were positioned in the distal coronary sinus and in the high right atrium. Synchronised shocks were delivered using an escalating protocol of 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 50 Joules. In group I, 1 patient was resistant to maximal energy (success rate 91%). The mean energy of the maximal shock was 18 ± 13 J. In group II, all patients were converted to sinus rhythm. The mean energy of the maximal shock was 9 ± 5 J (p < 0.01 vs. group I). No significant complications occurred. At 3 months follow-up, 45% of group I and 60% of group II patients remained in sinus rhythm (p = NS).We conclude that internal cardioversion using rectilinear biphasic waveform is feasible and safe, and requires less energy than classical monophasic waveforms.     

Time to Cardioversion of Recurrent Atrial Arrhythmias After Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation and Long‐Term Clinical Outcome

Introduction: It is unclear whether early restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with persistent atrial arrhythmias after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) facilitates reverse atrial remodeling and promotes long‐term maintenance of sinus rhythm. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the time to restoration of sinus rhythm after a recurrence of an atrial arrhythmia and long‐term maintenance of sinus rhythm after radiofrequency catheter ablation of AF. Methods and Results: Radiofrequency catheter ablation was performed in 384 consecutive patients (age 60 ± 9 years) for paroxysmal (215 patients) or persistent AF (169 patients). Transthoracic cardioversion was performed in all 93 patients (24%) who presented with a persistent atrial arrhythmia: AF (n = 74) or atrial flutter (n = 19) at a mean of 51 ± 53 days from the recurrence of atrial arrhythmia and 88 ± 72 days from the ablation procedure. At a mean of 16 ± 10 months after the ablation procedure, 25 of 93 patients (27%) who underwent cardioversion were in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic therapy. Among the 46 patients who underwent cardioversion at ≤30 days after the recurrence, 23 (50%) were in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic therapy. On multivariate analysis of clinical variables, time to cardioversion within 30 days after the onset of atrial arrhythmia was the only independent predictor of maintenance of sinus rhythm in the absence of antiarrhythmic drug therapy after a single ablation procedure (OR 22.5; 95% CI 4.87–103.88, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Freedom from AF/flutter is achieved in approximately 50% of patients who undergo cardioversion within 30 days of a persistent atrial arrhythmia after catheter ablation of AF.     

经胸体外直流电复律治疗心房颤动的进展

虽然心房颤动的治疗已取得很大的进展,经胸体外直流电复律仍然是临床上常用的治疗心房颤动的方法,它高效、安全,近年来,为使其效率进一步提高,现就采取的一些改进措施进行综述。包括:(1)电极板的位置、数量:多数研究证实前-后位置复律优于前-前(侧)位置,表现在复律的成功率高、用电量低上;还可应用X线透视以优化电极板的位置,使其尽可能包绕心房肌,以此来提高复律成功率;另外,同时应用2台体外除颤器的更高能量的电复律对那些标准能量复律无作用的心房颤动患者有效,并且同样安全。(2)输出波形为双相波形时对心房颤动的转复具有比单相波形更高的效率,要求的电量更低,且同样对心肌无损害。(3)首次放电量较高,如≥150 J时复律的成功率高。(4)除了抗心律失常药物,近几年新出现的一些药物如血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、血管紧张素Ⅱ受体拮抗剂以及他汀类药物也可影响心房颤动体外电复律的效果。     

心房颤动患者的抗凝治疗

心房颤动是临床实践中最常见且危害严重的心律失常,是缺血性脑卒中的最主要危险因素之一。有效的抗凝治疗可显著降低心房颤动患者缺血性脑卒中的发生率,成为心房颤动患者治疗策略的重中之重。新型口服抗凝剂为心房颤动患者的抗凝治疗提供了更多选择。现结合近年发表的相关文献对心房颤动患者的抗凝治疗进行综述。     

非瓣膜病心房颤动病人电复律前后左心房功能变化研究

目的评价经食道超声心动图(TEE)对非瓣膜病心房颤动(房颤)病人电复律前后左心房功能变化.方法选择房颤持续2周以上的非瓣膜疾病病人18例,其中原发性高血压6例,扩张型心肌病6例,脑血栓4例,缺血性心肌病2例.应用TEE确定左心房内无血栓后行电复律,转为窦性心律者测定左心耳血流最大速度及流速积分,肺静脉血流最大速度及流速积分、二尖瓣血流最大速度、流速积分及减速时间.结果左心耳排空速度于复律后显著减少,有显著性差异(P＜0.05),排空指数增加(P＞0.05),电复律后肺静脉收缩期、舒张期最大流速及其流速积分比值无显著差异(P＞0.05),收缩期最大流速积分在左、右肺静脉均有显著差异(P均＜0.05).复律前后舒张期最大流速积分在右肺静脉有显著性差异(P＜0.05),左肺静脉差异不显著(P＞0.05).二尖瓣血流E波最大速度及E波与A波比值(E/A)增加.结论适合的抗凝治疗及TEE确认心房内无附壁血栓后进行电复律治疗,安全又无并发症.TEE能评价房颤病人电复律后的左心房功能变化.电复律后心房的电活动及机械活动均微弱,能引起左心房功能不全及栓塞,所以心房功能完全恢复前均有必要进行抗凝治疗.     

P Wave Amplitude and Duration may Predict Immediate Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation After Internal Cardioversion

Background: Although internal cardioversion (IC) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is effective at restoring sinus rhythm, immediate recurrence (IR) of AF after IC is a major and largely unpredictable clinical problem. The purpose of the study was to determine the role of P wave duration and amplitude in prediction of IR of AF after IC. Forty‐five consecutive patients undergoing IC for chronic AF were evaluated. Material and Methods: After successful IC, 1‐minute ECG recording was obtained in all patients. P wave duration and amplitude in Lead II and V₁ were measured using computer. Forty patients (88%) had successful IC. Thirteen patients experienced IR of AF within 1 minute of restoring sinus rhythm. Results and Conclusion: As a result, the incidence of IR of AF after IC was higher in the patients with shorter P wave amplitude (for lead II P < 0.01 , for V₁P < 0.01 ) and larger P wave duration (for lead II P < 0.01 , for V₁P < 0.05 ).