Comparison of the efficacy of direct coronary stenting with sirolimus-eluting stents versus stenting with predilation by intravascular ultrasound imaging (from the DIRECT trial)

A direct coronary stenting technique using drug-eluting stents may decrease drug-eluting stent efficacy due to possible damage to the surface coating of the stent. The DIRECT is a multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized trial designed to evaluate the direct stenting strategy for the sirolimus-eluting Bx-Velocity stent compared with the historical control (SIRIUS trial, stenting with predilation). Volumetric and cross-sectional intravascular ultrasound analyses at 8-month follow-up were performed in 115 patients (DIRECT n= 64, control n = 51). Patient and lesion characteristics were comparable between groups. The DIRECT group achieved an equivalent uniform expansion index, defined as minimum stent area/maximum stent area x 100, compared with the control group (65.9 +/- 11.7 vs 63.1 +/- 12.7, p = NS). At 8-month follow-up, vessel, stent, lumen, and neointimal volume index (volume in cubic millimeters/length in millimeters) and percent neointimal volume were similar between the DIRECT and control groups (vessel volume index 13.9 +/- 4.40 vs 15.0 +/- 3.83; stent volume index 6.83 +/- 2.02 vs 6.94 +/- 2.04; lumen volume index 6.71 +/- 2.04 vs 6.81 +/- 2.07; neointimal volume index 0.14 +/- 0.24 vs 0.16 +/- 0.23; percent neointimal volume 3.73 +/- 6.97 vs 3.14 +/- 5.32, p = NS for all). In addition, in-stent neointimal hyperplasia distribution was significantly smaller near the distal stent edge (0.22 vs 0.098 mm(3)/mm, p = 0.01 for an average neointimal volume index within 3 mm from the distal stent edge). In conclusion, direct coronary stenting with the sirolimus-eluting Bx-Velocity stent is equally effective in terms of uniform stent expansion and long-term quantitative intravascular ultrasound results compared with conventional stenting using predilation. This strategy appears to be associated with less neointimal hyperplasia near the distal stent edge.     

Intravascular ultrasound evaluation after sirolimus eluting stent implantation for de novo and in-stent restenosis lesions.

AIMS: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) on neointimal growth and vessel remodelling for in-stent restenosis versus de novo coronary artery lesions using serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population consisted of 86 patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) (n=41) or de novo lesions (n=45) treated with SES and evaluated by IVUS post-procedure and at follow-up. One 18-mm SES was used for de novo lesions while 16 patients with ISR received >1SES (total stented length 17.9 mm vs 22.0 mm respectively; P=0.004). At follow-up, no differences were observed between the ISR and de novo groups with respect to changes in the mean external elastic membrane (1.7% vs 1.3%; P=0.53), plaque behind the stent (1.2% vs 3.4%; P=0.49), and lumen areas (0.7% vs 1.9%; P=0.58). No positive remodelling or edge effect was observed. A gap between stents was observed in two patients with ISR, where more prominent, though non-obstructive, neointimal proliferation was noted. CONCLUSION: Sirolimus-eluting stenting is equally effective at inhibiting neointimal proliferation in de novo and ISR lesions without inducing edge restenosis or positive vascular remodelling.     

Comparison of neointimal coverage by optical coherence tomography of a sirolimus-eluting stent versus a bare-metal stent three months after implantation

No detailed data regarding neointimal coverage of bare-metal stents (BMSs) at 3 months after implantation was reported to date. This investigation was designed to evaluate the neointimal coverage of BMSs compared with sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) using optical coherence tomography. A prospective optical coherence tomographic follow-up examination was performed 3 months after stent implantation for patients who underwent BMS (n = 16) or SES implantation (n = 24). Neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) thickness on each stent strut and percentage of NIH area in each cross section were measured. Malapposition of stent struts to the vessel wall and the existence of in-stent thrombi were also evaluated. There were 5,076 struts of SESs and 2,875 struts of BMSs identified. NIH thickness and percentage of NIH area in the BMS group were higher than in the SES group (351 +/- 248 vs 31 +/- 39 mum; p <0.0001; 45.0 +/- 14% vs 10.0 +/- 4%; p <0.0001, respectively). The frequency of uncovered struts was higher in the SES group than the BMS group (15% vs 0.1%; p <0.0001). Malapposed struts were observed more frequently in the SES group than the BMS group (15% vs 1.1%; p <0.0001). In conclusion, there was no difference in incidence of in-stent thrombus between the 2 groups (14% vs 0%; p = 0.23). The present study showed almost all BMS struts to be well covered at a 3-month follow-up, suggesting that patients receiving BMS stents may not require dual-antiplatelet therapy >3 months after implantation.     

Vascular effects of sirolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stents in diabetic patients: three-dimensional ultrasound results of the Diabetes and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent (DIABETES) Trial.

OBJECTIVES: A predefined intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) substudy was performed to evaluate the vascular effects of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) versus bare-metal stent (BMS). BACKGROUND: The Diabetes and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent (DIABETES) trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial aimed at demonstrating the efficacy of the SES compared with BMS in diabetic patients. METHODS: Serial intravascular ultrasound analyses were performed in 140 lesions (SES = 75; BMS = 65) immediately after stent implantation and at nine-month follow-up. Vessel, luminal, and stent mean areas and volumes were evaluated at both edges and within the stented segment. Qualitative assessment of residual dissections and stent apposition were also performed. RESULTS: Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar between groups. At 9 months, in-stent neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) mean area and volume were significantly reduced in the SES group (median NIH area 0.01 mm2 [0.0 to 0.1] vs. 2.0 mm2 [1.0 to 2.9] and median NIH volume 0.11 mm3 [0 to 2.1] vs. 35.3 mm3 [16.6 to 62.6]; both p < 0.0001). In the SES group, stent edges evidenced significant increase in lumen dimensions mainly due to significant increase in vessel volume, whereas those of the BMS group presented vessel shrinkage leading to significant lumen reduction. Late acquired incomplete stent apposition was observed in 11 lesions (14.7%) in the SES group and 0 in the BMS group (p = 0.001). At one year, no stent thromboses occurred in malapposed stents. CONCLUSIONS: The SES implantation effectively inhibits NIH in diabetic patients. The antirestenotic effect of SES is also appreciated at the stent edges. Late acquired stent malapposition is a frequent phenomenon in diabetic patients treated with SES.     

Comparison of angioscopic findings and three-year cardiac events between sirolimus-eluting stent and bare-metal stent in acute myocardial infarction

The safety of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains controversial. We compared long-term neointimal coverage after stent implantation for AMI evaluated by coronary angioscopy and 3-year clinical events between SESs and bare-metal stents (BMSs). Eighty-seven consecutive patients who received SESs or BMSs for AMI were enrolled. At 8 months after AMI coronary angiography with angioscopy was performed. Using angioscopy we evaluated maximum and minimum grades of neointimal coverage using an angioscopic score (0 to 3). We calculated the heterogeneity score as the maximum grade minus the minimum grade. We compared angioscopic parameters including minimum grade and heterogeneity score of neointimal coverage, thrombi and plaque color, serum parameters, and major adverse cardiac events for 3 years between the 2 groups. The restenosis rate of the SES group (n = 56) was significantly lower than that of the BMS group (n = 31, 9% vs 31%, p = 0.015). The SES group had a lower minimum grade of neointimal coverage and higher heterogeneity score and prevalence of thrombi than the BMS group, but from 8 months to 3 years after stent implantation there were no significant differences in major adverse cardiac events between the 2 groups. In conclusion, a lower minimum grade and greater heterogeneity of neointimal coverage and thrombi were shown for SESs compared to BMSs at 8 months after AMI. However, these findings did not correlate with cardiac events over a period of 3 years in our patients.     

Intravascular ultrasound comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent versus bare metal stent implantation in diseased saphenous vein grafts (from the RRISC [Reduction of Restenosis In Saphenous Vein Grafts With Cypher Sirolimus-Eluting Stent] trial)

The randomized Reduction of Restenosis In Saphenous Vein Grafts with Cypher Sirolimus-Eluting Stent trial compared angiographic outcomes of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) versus bare metal stents (BMSs) in saphenous vein grafts (SVG). Using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) performed during 6-month follow-up angiography, we compared the vascular effects of the 2 types of stent on SVGs. Of 75 patients (96 lesions) included, 59 patients underwent IVUS in 61 SVGs; 29 patients received 40 SESs for 34 lesions, and 30 patients received 42 BMSs for 39 lesions. IVUS parameters (diameters, areas, and volumes) were compared in the 2 groups. A specific analysis was performed for overlapping SESs. Median neointimal volume was 1.3 mm(3) (interquartile range 0 to 13.1) in SESs versus 24.5 (7.8 to 39.5) in BMSs (p <0.001). Minimal incomplete stent apposition was detected at only 3 stent edges (2 BMSs, 1 SES) next to ectatic regions of the SVG. Compared with single SESs, overlapping SESs showed significant increases in neointimal reaction, with a neointimal volume of 0.6 mm(3)/mm of stent (0.1 to 1.8) versus 0 (0 to 0.4) in single SESs (p = 0.03), and this phenomenon was mainly localized in overlapping SES segments, where neointimal volume per millimeter of stent was 1.1 mm(3)/mm (0.6 to 4.4) versus 0 (0 to 1.3) in nonoverlapping segments (p = 0.05). In conclusion, SESs effectively inhibit neointimal hyperplasia volume compared with BMSs in diseased vein grafts, without evidence of increased incomplete apposition risk. The neointimal response to overlapping SES layers seems higher than to a single SES layer.     

"Head-to-head comparison between sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with complex coronary artery disease: an intravascular ultrasound study".

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess neointimal hyperplasia following sirolimus-eluting (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) implantation in a patients with complex coronary disease. METHOD: Between January to December 2004, 70 patients were enrolled in this study (SES = 37; PES = 33. The primary objective was to assess the efficacy of SES and PES on neointimal proliferation inhibition in patients with complex coronary lesions by volumetric 3D intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) assessment at six-month follow-up. RESULTS: Baseline clinical, demographic or angiographic characteristics were well balanced in both groups. All procedures as well as hospitalisation were uneventful. The percentage of B2/C lesions in our study was > 90% in both groups. The IVUS-assessed in-stent mean neointimal hyperplasia volume was significantly lower in lesions treated with SES compared to PES (4.1 +/- 11 mm3 vs. 17.4 +/- 23 mm3, p < 0.002) at 6 month follow-up. No difference in both MACE (3.0 versus 6.0%, p = NS) and restenosis (5.4 versus 9.1%, p = NS) were found. The in-segment late loss at six month was 0.26 mm in the SES and 0.48 mm in the PES group (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed reduced neointimal proliferation after sirolimuseluting as compared to paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with complex coronary artery disease. Both SES and PES were associated with low rate of angiographic restenosis or major adverse cardiovascular events.     

Volumetric intravascular ultrasound assessment of neointimal hyperplasia and nonuniform stent strut distribution in sirolimus-eluting stent restenosis

The neointimal hyperplasia (IH) distribution pattern of in-stent restenotic lesions after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation has not been well described. We identified 48 in-stent restenotic lesions (41 patients) after SES implantation and performed volumetric intravascular ultrasound analyses. Lumen area, stent area, and IH area at the minimal lumen area site were 2.7 +/- 1.0, 5.4 +/- 1.9, and 2.7 +/- 1.4 mm(2), respectively. IH area at the minimal lumen site was larger in the group with a stent area > or =5.0 mm(2) than the group with a stent area <5.0 mm(2) (3.7 +/- 1.3 vs 1.9 +/- 0.8 mm(2), p <0.001). There were fewer visualized stent struts in lesions with a minimum stent area > or =5.0 mm(2) at the minimum lumen site compared with those with a stent area <5.0 mm(2) (0.69 +/- 0.25 vs 0.83 +/- 0.16, p = 0.04). When we compared lesions in patients with diabetes mellitus with patients without diabetes, minimum lumen areas, percent IH at minimal lumen area, percent IH, and neointima-free stent length were identical. In conclusion, (1) lesions without SES underexpansion at the minimum lumen site had more IH and greater nonuniform stent strut distribution compared with restenotic SESs that were underexpanded, and (2) the IH response did not appear to be more aggressive in patients with diabetes mellitus than in those without diabetes mellitus.     

Intracoronary brachytherapy after stenting de novo lesions in diabetic patients: results of a randomized intravascular ultrasound study

OBJECTIVES: We studied the efficacy of intracoronary brachytherapy (ICB) after successful coronary stenting in diabetic patients with de novo lesions. BACKGROUND: Intracoronary brachytherapy has proven effective in preventing recurrences in patients with in-stent restenosis. However, the role of ICB for the treatment of de novo coronary stenoses remains controversial. METHODS: Ninety-two patients were randomized to either ICB or no radiation after stenting. Primary end points were in-stent mean neointimal area (primary end point of efficacy) and minimal luminal area of the entire vessel segment (primary end point of effectiveness), as assessed by intravascular ultrasound at six-month follow-up. Quantitative coronary angiography analysis was performed at the target, injured, irradiated, and entire vessel segments. RESULTS: At follow-up, the in-stent mean neointimal area was 52% smaller in the ICB group (p < 0.0001). However, there was no difference in the minimal luminal area of the vessel segment (4.5 +/- 2.4 mm2 vs. 4.4 +/- 2.1 mm2). Restenosis rates increased progressively by the analyzed segment in the ICB group: target (7.1% vs. 20.9%, p = 0.07), injured (9.5% vs. 20.9%, p = NS), irradiated (14.3% vs. 20.9%, p = NS), and vessel segment (23.8% vs. 25.6%, p = NS). At one year, 1 cardiac death, 6 myocardial infarctions (MIs) (3 due to late stent thrombosis), and 10 target vessel revascularizations (TVRs) (6 due to the edge effect) occurred in the ICB group, whereas in the nonradiation group, there were 11 TVRs and no deaths or MIs. CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary brachytherapy significantly inhibited in-stent neointimal hyperplasia after stenting in diabetic patients. However, clinically this was counteracted by the occurrence of the edge effect and late stent thrombosis.     

Impact of intravascular ultrasound lesion characteristics on neointimal hyperplasia following sirolimus-eluting stent implantation

The effect of lesion characteristics on neointimal hyperplasia after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation was examined in 45 patients who underwent successful preinterventional intravascular ultrasound. There were no differences in neointimal hyperplasia between the moderate/severe calcified lesion group (calcium arc >120 degrees ) and the non/mild calcified lesion group or between the positive vessel remodeling group (external elastic membrane area at the minimal lumen area site larger than that at the proximal reference site) and negative vessel remodeling group. No correlation between preinterventional plaque burden and neointimal hyperplasia was found. In patients who have coronary artery disease, sirolimus-eluting stents continue to demonstrate striking suppression of neointimal proliferation, irrespective of lesion characteristics previously associated with greater restenotic risk.     

雷帕霉素药物洗脱支架对糖尿病小型猪冠状动脉支架置入后内膜增生的影响

目的:评估雷帕霉素药物洗脱支架(SES)对糖尿病小型猪冠状动脉支架置入后内膜增生的作用.方法:建立链脲菌素诱导的糖尿病小型猪模型(糖尿病组,n=12),随机选取2支冠状动脉置入SES,共计置入24枚支架,术后饲养6个月,与非糖尿病置入SES支架的小型猪模型(对照组,n=12)比较冠状动脉造影、血管内超声及组织切片检查结果.结果:两组动物支架置入冠状动脉分布,术前参照血管直径[糖尿病组:(2.78±0.35)mm,对照组:(2.81±0.29)mm]及术后即刻最小管腔内径[糖尿病组:(2.90±0.42)mm,对照组:(2.89±0.33)mm]均相似(P均>0.05).术后6个月糖尿病组支架内狭窄程度[(35.6±9.2)%和(7.9±3.1)%,P<0.001]、支架内晚期管腔丢失[(0.32±0.09)mm和(0.09±0.04)mm,P<0.001]、新生内膜厚度[血管内超声:(0.35±0.12)mm和(0.11±0.08)mm,P<0.05]及新生内膜面积[血管内超声:(1.29±0.51)mm~2和(0.26±0.11)mm~2,P<0.001;组织切片:(1.24±0.76)mm~2和(0.19±0.08)mm~2,P<0.05]均显著高于对照组.结论:糖尿病小型猪冠状动脉置入SES后内膜增生程度显著高于无糖尿病模型.     

Experimental Evaluation of a New Single Wire Tantalum Coil Coronary Stent (Wiktor-iª)

To improve scaffolding properties, a new more densely woven Wiktor stent, the Wiktor-ia stent, was developed. Although the metal coverage remains still low compared to other stents, increased metal/vessel area raises the concern of increased thrombogenicity and neointimal hyperplasia. In this study we evaluated the Wiktor-i stent in a porcine peripheral and coronary model and compared the thrombogenicity and neointimal hyperplasia with the Wiktor-GX coronary stent. In a first study, a Wiktor-i and a Wiktor-GX coronary stent were implanted symmetrically in a preselected side branch of the right and left iliac artery of 10 healthy pigs. Quantitative vessel analysis showed comparable data before, immediately after and at follow-up. Hyperplasia measured by morphometry was also comparable in both groups (Wiktor-GX: 1.43 mm2 vs. Wiktor-i: 1.17 mm2, NS). Also, area stenosis was very similar (Wiktor-GX: 32% vs. Wiktor-i: 29%, NS). In a second study, 20 Wiktor (Wiktor-i: n=10, Wiktor-GX: n=10) coronary stents were implanted in the right coronary artery of 20 healthy pigs. Quantitative coronary analysis before, immediately after and at follow-up was comparable in both stents. The hyperplasia measured morphometrically was also comparable in both stents. (Wiktor-GX: 1.51 +/- 0.47 mm2 vs. Wiktor-i: 1.46 +/- 0.66 mm2, NS). Also the area stenosis was not significantly different (Wiktor-GX: 31% vs. Wiktor-i: 35%). In conclusion, this study shows that the increased metal/vessel area of the Wiktor-i stent does not result in an increased neointimal hyperplasia. Both stents show to be very biocompatible when implanted in porcine coronary and peripheral vessels.     

雷帕霉素洗脱支架治疗支架内再狭窄的临床及冠状动脉造影随访观察

目的评价雷帕霉素洗脱支架(商品名Cypher支架,强生公司产品)治疗支架内再狭窄的疗效及安全性。方法27例支架内再狭窄且有临床缺血症状的患者接受了Cypher支架治疗,其中23例患者的支架内再狭窄为弥漫、复杂病变,有5例同时置入了2个Cypher支架。术后对所有患者进行临床随访及冠状动脉造影复查。结果所有支架均成功置入,无残余狭窄或残余狭窄<10%,未见任何并发症。平均随访时间8.9±2.1(5～14)年,临床随访率96.3%,造影随访率92.6%。随访期间,无一例患者死亡。有1例支架近端边缘节段血管发生了再狭窄导致临床心绞痛复发,2例支架近端边缘节段有轻微的新生内膜增殖,但狭窄程度<25%,其余24例均无明显的晚期管腔丢失。本组支架内平均晚期管腔丢失(0.09±0.02)mm、支架远端边缘节段(0.10±0.03)mm、支架近端边缘节段(0.20±0.06)mm。靶血管血运重建率3.8%。结论Cypher支架治疗支架内再狭窄安全、可行,它能有效防止这类病变的新生内膜增殖和再次再狭窄。     

Effect of local delivery of L-arginine on in-stent restenosis in humans

To determine whether intramural administration of L-arginine reduces intimal thickening after optimal Palmaz-Schatz stent deployment in humans, 50 patients with native coronary artery disease who received a single Palmaz-Schatz stent were enrolled in this pilot study. Patients were randomized into 2 treatment groups: an L-arginine group (n = 25) and a saline group (n = 25). After stent deployment, L-arginine (600 mg/6 ml) or saline (6 ml) was locally delivered via the Dispatch catheter (Scimed) over 15 minutes. Serial angiography and intravascular ultrasound examinations (motorized pull-back at 0.5 mm/s) were performed before and after the procedure, and at 6-month follow-up. Measurements of stent area, lumen area, and neointimal area were computed within the stents at 1-mm intervals, by technicians who were blinded to the treatment assignment. Using Simpson's rule, stent, plaque, and lumen volumes, neointimal volume within the stent, and percent neointimal volume were measured before and after the procedure, and at 6-month follow-up. The 6-month volume data in quantitative coronary ultrasound showed that neointimal volume in the L-arginine group was significantly less than in the saline group (25 vs 39 mm(3); p = 0.049). Similarly, percent neointimal volume was significantly less in the L-arginine group at 6-month follow-up (17 +/- 13% vs 27 +/- 21%; p = 0.048). Thus, these results showed that local delivery of L-arginine reduces in-stent neointimal hyperplasia in humans, indicating that this approach may be a novel strategy to prevent in-stent restenosis.     

Preventive effect of an antiallergic drug,pemirolast potassium,on restenosis after stent placement: quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound studies

OBJECTIVES: The preventive effect of pemirolast against restenosis after coronary stent placement was evaluated. METHODS: Eighty-four patients with 89 de novo lesions who underwent successful coronary stenting were assigned to the pemirolast group(40 patients, 45 lesions) and the control group(44 patients, 44 lesions). Administration of pemirolast(20 mg/day) was initiated from the next morning after stenting and continued for 6 months of follow-up. Quantitative coronary angiography was performed immediately after stenting and at follow-up. Angiographic restenosis was defined as diameter stenosis > or = 50% at follow-up. Intravascular ultrasound study conducted at follow-up angiography was used to measure vessel cross-sectional area(CSA), stent CSA, lumen CSA, neointima CSA(stent CSA--lumen CSA), and percentage neointima CSA(neointima CSA/stent CSA x 100%) at the minimal lumen site. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Restenosis rate was significantly lower in the pemirolast group than in the control group(15.0% vs 34.1% of patients, 13.3% vs 34.1% of lesions, p < 0.05, respectively). The intravascular ultrasound study at follow-up(36 lesions in the pemirolast group, 33 in the control group) found no significant differences in vessel CSA and stent CSA between the two groups(17.3 +/- 2.2 vs 16.8 +/- 2.4 mm2, 8.6 +/- 1.9 vs 8.4 +/- 1.7 mm2, respectively). However, lumen CSA was significantly larger in the pemirolast group than in the control group(5.5 +/- 1.3 vs 4.4 +/- 1.1 mm2, p < 0.05). Moreover, neointima CSA and percentage neointima CSA were significantly smaller in the pemirolast group(3.1 +/- 1.1 vs 4.0 +/- 1.2 mm2, p < 0.05 and 36.2 +/- 15.9% vs 47.4 +/- 15.6%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Pemirolast has a preventive effect against restenosis after stent placement, possibly by inhibiting neointimal hyperplasia.     

Randomized comparison of sirolimus and paclitaxel drug-eluting stents for long lesions in the left anterior descending artery: an intravascular ultrasound study.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this work was to verify whether the superiority of the sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in inhibiting neointimal hyperplasia could be demonstrated in complex coronary lesions. BACKGROUND: Both the SES (Cypher, Cordis, Miami Lakes, Florida) and the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) (Taxus, Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) have shown a marked reduction in neointimal hyperplasia compared with bare-metal stents. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is the best method to assess arterial response to stent deployment, but few IVUS data are available comparing complex lesions treated with SES or PES. METHODS: We prospectively randomized patients with complex lesions to SES or PES implantation. Intravascular ultrasound and quantitative angiography were performed post-procedure and at 9 months. Mean neointimal hyperplasia area (NIHA), percent of NIHA (NIHA%), mean peristent plaque area (PSPA), and percent of PSPA (PSPA%) were calculated. The primary end point was NIHA% at follow-up. Secondary end points included change in PSPA% and angiographic late luminal loss at follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients enrolled, 42 receiving the SES and 43 receiving the PES had adequate IVUS assessment. Vessel, plaque, and lumen areas were comparable at follow-up, but NIHA% was significantly lower with SES than PES (7.4 +/- 4.2% vs. 15.4 +/- 8.1%; p < 0.001). A significant reduction in PSPA% was observed with SES (-4 +/- 10% vs. 0 +/- 8%; p = 0.01). Late loss was significantly lower with SES (0.16 +/- 0.19 mm vs. 0.32 +/- 0.33 mm; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The SES shows a significantly higher inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia compared with PES in complex lesions. However, both stents have excellent IVUS and angiographic results at 9 months. A significant reduction in peri-stent plaque is observed only with SES.     

Vascular response to sirolimus-eluting stents delivered with a nonaggressive implantation technique: comparison of intravascular ultrasound results from the multicenter, randomized E-SIRIUS, and SIRIUS trials.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of SES to reduce the risk of restenosis was initially demonstrated in short lesions using stent implantation with routine pre-dilatation and post-dilatation. This intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) substudy of the E-SIRIUS trial sought to evaluate local arterial responses to sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) delivered with a stent implantation technique allowing direct stenting and only selectively applying high-pressure post-dilatation. METHODS AND RESULTS: IVUS was performed immediately after intervention and at 8-month follow-up in 51 patients randomised to either bare-metal stents (BMS; Bx-Velocitytrade mark; N=20) or SES (Cyphertrade mark N=31). Direct stenting was allowed (24%) and post-dilation was performed only selectively (32%). Lumen dimensions, intimal hyperplasia and vessel remodeling were compared between SES and BMS. Subsequently, results of SES in the E-SIRIUS IVUS substudy (N=31) were compared to those of SES in the IVUS substudy of the SIRIUS trial (N=137). SES in SIRIUS IVUS substudy were delivered with 100% pre-dilatation and 77% post-dilatation. Baseline stent and reference segment measurements were similar between BMS and SES in E-SIRIUS IVUS patients. Using SES there was a 96% reduction in intimal hyperplasia volume within the stented segment (1.8+/-4.9 vs 50.6+/-39.7 mm3, P<0.001) and a significantly larger minimal lumen cross sectional area at 8-month follow-up (4.5+/-1.1 vs 2.3+/-0.9 mm2, P<0.001). No vessel remodeling was observed with the use of SES. The applied stent implantation technique resulted in a minimal stent/reference vessel area ratio of 0.75+/-0.17 in E-SIRIUS SES as compared to 0.84+/-0.23 in SIRIUS SES (P=0.046). Mean intimal hyperplasia cross-sectional area at follow-up was 0.1+/-0.2 mm2 in the SES group of E-SIRIUS and 0.5+/-0.8 mm2 in the SES group of SIRIUS (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: An implantation technique of SES which includes direct stenting and minimizes the use of high-pressure post-dilatation results in less optimal stent expansion. However, follow-up results compare very favourable to those of BMS and are characterised by even less intimal hyperplasia than after a more forceful implantation of SES.     

Overlapping Coronary Stents Result in an Increased Neointimal Hyperplasia: Insight from a Porcine Coronary Stent Model

Clinical experience suggests that overlapping coronary stents result in an increased in-stent restenosis. This study investigates the underlying mechanisms in a porcine coronary model. Single or two overlapping self-made stainless steel single wire sinusoidal helical coil stents were randomly deployed in the right coronary artery of 20 cross-bred pigs. The pigs underwent a control angiogram at 6 weeks and were then sacrificed. Quantitative coronary analysis before, immediately after stent implantation, and at 6 weeks was performed using the semiautomated Polytron 1000 system. Morphometry was performed using a computerized morphometric program. Angiographic analysis revealed a decreased recoil in the overlapping group (1% vs 4%: P < 0.02) and a significantly larger minimal stent lumen diameter at follow-up in the single stent group (2.87 ± 0.16 vs 2.58 ± 0.22 mm, P = 0.005). Histopathology showed a significantly increased injury (1.27 ± 0.43 vs 0.83 ± 0.44, P = 0.042) and inflammatory reaction (1.51 ± 0.11 vs 1.09 ± 0.54, P = 0.035) surrounding the stent filaments in the overlapping stent group. Morphometric analysis showed a significantly higher neointimal hyperplasia (3.34 ± 0.68 vs 2.16 ± 1.48 mm², P = 0.034) in the overlapping stent group. Overlapping stents result in a more pronounced coronary vessel injury resulting in more inflammation and neointimal hyperplasia compared to single stents.     

Comparison of safety and efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) are superior to bare metal stents (BMSs) for percutaneous coronary intervention, but data regarding SESs in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are limited. We investigated the clinical outcomes of patients with STEMI who were treated with SESs. We measured clinical characteristics and acute and long-term outcomes in 306 consecutive patients with STEMI who received a SES (n = 156) or a BMS (n = 150). Patients were followed for death, nonfatal reinfarction, and target vessel revascularization. Patients with SESs had a 0.6% in-hospital mortality rate versus 5.3% in patients with BMSs (p = 0.015). Six-month mortality rates were 1.9% (SES) and 10.1% (BMS, p = 0.003). At 6 months, patients with SESs were less likely to have target vessel revascularization (1.3% vs 8.1%, p = 0.005) and achieve the composite end point (3.2% vs 16.1%, p = 0.0001). No subacute thrombosis or clinical restenosis occurred in the SES group. Patients who received BMSs were older, received more stents, and had more myocardial damage, worse renal function, and lower ejection fractions than did those in the SES group. By multivariate discriminant analysis, stent type (SES vs BMS) was the most significant determinant of the 6-month composite end point (p = 0.01) and the need for target vessel revascularization (p = 0.02). In conclusion, SESs are safe and effective in STEMI at 6 months.     

Angiographic and volumetric intravascular ultrasound comparison between direct sirolimus-eluting stent implantation versus predilation

Conventional sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation typically follows balloon predilation. The impact of direct SES implantation on in-stent neointimal hyperplasia and the adjacent reference segments has not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to analyze direct and conventional SES implantation techniques by angiography and serial intravascular ultrasound. Fifty-three patients with single de novo coronary lesions underwent successful conventional (n = 26) and direct (n = 27) SES implantation. At 6-month follow-up, similar in-stent late luminal loss and decreased neointimal hyperplasia volume were seen in the 2 groups, preserving the luminal dimensions at the edges of the stents.