Cocaine inhibition of neuronal differentiation in NGF-induced PC12 cells is independent of ras signaling

In utero exposure to cocaine may result in altered neuronal development. Our previous studies demonstrated cocaine inhibits neurite outgrowth in NGF-induced PC12 cells through dopamine, by activation of D₁ receptors. This study examined where cocaine interferes in the NGF signaling cascade. GSras1 cells that inducibly express activated forms of Ras upon treatment with dexamethasone were used. Morphological differentiation was quantified by counting cells bearing neurite-like processes after 72 h exposure to either dexamethasone or NGF alone, or with cocaine, dopamine or SKF-38393. Cocaine, dopamine, and the D₁ agonist inhibited neurite-like process outgrowth in both dexamethasone and NGF-induced GSras1 cells. GAP-43 expression, used as a measure for biochemical differentiation was severely diminished in NGF and dexamethasone-induced GSras1 cells treated with cocaine. These results suggest that cocaine, dopamine and activation of D₁ receptors affect the NGF signaling downstream, independent of ras expression, leading to altered neuronal differentiation.     

Cocaine inhibits NGF-induced PC12 cells differentiation through D(1)-type dopamine receptors

In utero cocaine exposure can adversely affect CNS development. Previous studies showed that cocaine inhibits neuronal differentiation in a dose-dependent fashion in nerve growth factor (NGF)-stimulated PC12 cells. Cocaine binds with high affinity to several neurotransmitter transporters, resulting in elevated neurotransmitter levels in nerve endings. To determine if cocaine inhibits neurite outgrowth through the effects of these neurotransmitters, we applied dopamine, norepinephrine, serotonin, and acetylcholine to NGF-induced PC12 cells. Dopamine was the only neurotransmitter to inhibit neurite outgrowth significantly in a dose-dependent pattern without affecting cell viability. Norepinephrine and acetylcholine did not affect neurite outgrowth, while serotonin enhanced it. Furthermore, GBR 12909, a potent dopamine transporter (DAT) inhibitor, yielded similar effects. We then showed PC12 cells express D(1) and D(2) receptors and DAT proteins. Dopamine uptake measured over time was significantly blocked by cocaine and GBR 12909 which may result in elevated extracellular dopamine. The role of dopamine receptors in PC12 differentiation was further examined by using D(1) and D(2) specific receptor agonists. Only the D(1) agonist, SKF-38393, had a significant dose-dependent inhibitory effect. In addition, a D(1) antagonist produced significant recovery of neurite outgrowth in cocaine-treated cells. These findings suggest that cocaine inhibitory effects on neuronal differentiation are mediated through its binding to the dopamine transporter, resulting in increased dopamine level in the synapses. Subsequently, up regulation of D(1) receptors alters NGF signaling pathways.     

The role of dopamine in the maintenance and breakdown of D1/D2 synergism

The neurochemical factors involved in the maintenance and breakdown of dopamine D₁/D₂ receptor synergism were investigated by giving rats various pharmacological treatments that diminish the ability of dopamine to interact with its D₁ and/or D₂ receptors. Following these treatments, rats were observed for the expression of stereotyped motor behavior in response to independent stimulation of D₁ or D₂ receptors. Independent D₂-mediated responses were observed: (a) 2 h after the last of three daily reserpine (1 mg/kg) injections, (b) 48 h after bilateral 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) lesions of the mesostriatal pathways, (c) 24 h after a concentrated 48-h regimen (one injection/6 h) of eticlopride (0.5 mg/kg) or eticlopride + SCH 23390 (0.5 mg each), and (d) 2 h after a concentrated 48-h regimen (one injection/6 h) of α-methyl-p-tyrosine (αMPT; 100 mg/kg), but not after control treatments or a concentrated regimen of SCH 23390 alone. By contrast, independent D₁-mediated responses were observed only after three daily reserpine injections or 48 h after bilateral 6-OHDA lesions. Independent D₁-mediated stereotypy was not observed under control conditions or following a concentrated 48-h regimen of (a) SCH 23390 or eticlopride (0.5 mg/kg each) alone or in combination, (b) a high dose of SCH 23390 (1.0 mg/kg), (c) αMPT (100 mg/kg), or (d) αMPT (100 mg/kg)+SCH 23390 (1.0 mg/kg). Reserpine, bilateral 6-OHDA, and αMPT treatments produced striatal dopamine depletions of 96%, 92%, and 71%, respectively. These data indicate that the breakdown in D₁/D₂ synergism consists of two components: (a) D₁ independence from the controlling influence of D₂ receptors, and (b) D₂ independence from the controlling influence of D₁ receptors. The interaction of synaptic DA with its D₂ receptors plays a major role in determining whether these receptors can function independently of D₁ receptors, whereas reduced DA-D₁ activity alone appears insufficient to elicit D₁ independence.     

Interactive effects of stimulation of D1 and D2 dopamine receptors on fos-like immunoreactivity in the normosensitive rat striatum

Systemic administration of the selective, full, D₁ dopamine agonist A-77636 [(1R,3S)3-(1′-adamantyl)-1-aminomethyl-3,4-dihydro-5,6-dihydroxy-1H-2-benzopyranhydrochloride] (0.36–2.9 mg/kg) led to a dose-dependent induction of Fos-like immunoreactivity (FLI) in the striatum. Quantitative analysis of the sections indicated that immunoreactive cells were more numerous in the medial than the lateral striatum and, within these regions, appeared to be randomly distributed. The staining produced by A-77636 could be abolished by pretreatment with the selective D₁ antagonist SCH-23390. The selective D₂ dopamine agonist quinpirole (3 mg/kg) had no effect on striatal FLI when given by itself, but markedly potentiated the weak striatal staining produced by low doses of A-77636. When combined with the highest dose of A-77636, which produced substantial staining by itself, quinpirole produced an increase in the number of immunoreactive cells seen in the lateral striatum but actually decreased the number present in the medial striatum. Statistical analysis of the distribution of immunoreactive cells demonstrated that, in both regions, quinpirole converted the relatively homogeneous staining seen after A-77636 alone into a markedly patchy pattern. These findings indicate that stimulation of D₂ receptors produces both stimulatory and inhibitory effects on the D₁-mediated expression of Fos in the striatum and that the interaction between D₁ and D₂ receptor stimulation must, therefore, be more complex than the simple synergism suggested by previous studies.     

Dopamine D2 receptor agents, but not dopamine D1, modify brain glucose metabolism

The effects of recently described selective dopamine D₁ and D₂ agonists and antagonists on brain glucose metabolism were studied using the 2-[¹⁴C]deoxyglucose autoradiographic technique. The administration of LY-141865 or YM-09151-2, which behave as a specific D₂ agonist and antagonist respectively, modified brain glucose metabolism in a manner similar to that previously described for more classical dopaminergic agents, such as apomorphine and haloperidol. In contrast, the administration of SKF 38393 or SCH 23390, a specific D₁ agonist and antagonist respectively, was not followed by significant modifications of brain glucose metabolism in any of the brain regions studied. These results indicate that D₂ but not D₁ dopamine receptors are involved in the regulation of local brain glucose metabolism.     

Effect of aging on vulnerability of striatal D1 And D2 dopamine receptor-containing neurons to kainic acid

Kainic acid lesions elicit reductions in ligand binding to both D₁ and D₂ striata dopamine receptors in young and old rats. Relative reductions are greatest for both receptors in young animals than old. In addition, D₁ receptor binding is reduced more than D₂ at both ages. These findings support the idea that those dopamine receptor neurons lost during aging may reside in a kainic acid sensitive population.     

Involvement of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in the ethanol-associated place preference in rats exposed to conditioned fear stress

The present study was designed to investigate: (1) the involvement of dopamine D₁ and D₂ receptors, and (2) the roles of these receptors and endogenous opioid systems (endorphinergic and enkephalinergic systems) in the ethanol-induced place preference in rats exposed to conditioned fear stress using the conditioned place preference paradigm. The administration of ethanol (300 mg/kg, i.p.) induced a significant place preference. The selective D₁ receptor antagonist R(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H3-benzazepine)hydrochloride (SCH23390; 0.01 and 0.03 mg/kg, s.c.) and the selective D₂ receptor antagonist S(−)-5-(aminosulfonyl)-N-[(1-ethyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)-methyl]-2-methoxybenzamide (sulpiride; 20 and 40 mg/kg, s.c.) significantly attenuated the ethanol-induced place preference. The administration of ethanol (75 mg/kg, i.p.) tended to produce a place preference, but this effect was not significant. SCH23390 (0.03 mg/kg, s.c.) and sulpiride (40 mg/kg, s.c.) significantly attenuated the enhancement of the ethanol (75 mg/kg, i.p.)-induced place preference produced by the μ-opioid receptor agonist morphine (0.1 mg/kg, s.c.). In addition, SCH23390 (0.03 mg/kg, s.c.) also significantly attenuated the enhancement of the ethanol (75 mg/kg, i.p.)-induced place preference produced by the selective δ-opioid receptor agonist 2-methyl-4aα-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-1,2,3,4,4a,5,12,12aα-octahydroquinolino[2,3,3,-g]isoquinoline (TAN-67; 20 mg/kg, s.c.). On the other hand, sulpiride (40 mg/kg) had no significant effect on the enhancement of the ethanol (75 mg/kg, i.p.)-induced place preference produced by TAN-67. These results suggest that D₁ and D₂ receptors may be involved in the rewarding mechanism of ethanol under psychological stress. In addition, D₁ receptors may participate in the rewarding effect of ethanol modulated by the activation of μ- and δ-opioid receptors, whereas D₂ receptors may participate in the rewarding effect of ethanol modulated by the activation of μ-opioid receptors, but not in that modulated by the activation of δ-opioid receptors.     

Blockade of dopamine D1 receptors by SCH 23390 antagonizes discriminative stimulus effects of pentazocine

The purpose of this investigation was to test the hypothesis that the discriminative stimulus properties of pentazocine are mediated through an interaction with dopamine receptors. Rats were trained to discriminate s.c. injections of pentazocine (3.0 mg/kg) from vehicle in a two-choice discrete trial avoidance paradigm. SCH 23390 (0.003–0.056 mg/kg), a selective antagonist of dopamine D₁ receptors, inhibited the discriminative stimulus effects of pentazocine in a dose-dependent fashion, whilst the selective D₂ receptor antagonist sulpiride (20.0–80.0 mg/kg) did not antagonize them. It appears that the dopamine D₁ receptors play an important role in the discriminative stimulus effects of pentazocine.     

Adaptive properties and heterogeneity of dopamine D2 receptors – Pharmacological implications

In this review, we focus on the marked adaptability of dopamine D₂ receptors to varying agonist levels and we discuss the extent to which this phenomenon can account for the heterogeneity of these receptors in regard to function and pharmacological responsiveness. We emphasize the significance of a distinction between synaptic and extrasynaptic receptors in this context. For example, the application of this dichotomy appears to shed new light on the various subgroups of antipsychotic drugs and the mechanisms underlying their different profiles.     

Possible role of dopamine D1 receptor in the behavioural supersensitivity to dopamine agonists induced by chronic treatment with antidepressants

The effect of chronic treatment with antidepressants (ADs) on the behavioral responses to LY 171555, a selective D₂ receptor agonist, SKF 38393, a selective D₁ receptor agonist, and B-HT 920, a selective DA autoreceptor agonist, was studied in rats. In normal rats small, intermediate and high doses of LY 171555 produced hypomotility, hyperactivity and stereotypies, respectively. Chronic but not acute pretreatment with imipramine (IMI) greatly potentiated the motor stimulant effect of LY 171555, but failed to modify its stereotypic and sedative effect. The potentiation of the motor stimulant effect of LY 171555 was observed also after chronic, but not acute, treatment with desmethylimipramine (DMI), mianserin (MIA) or repeated electroconvulsive shock (ECS). Chronic treatment with IMI failed to modify the effect of SKF 38393 (motor stimulation, grooming and penile erection), but reversed the sedative effect of B-HT 920 into a motor stimulant response. The motor stimulant response to LY 171555 in IMI-pretreated animals was suppressed byl-sulpiride, a D₂ antagonist, and by a combination of reserpine with α-methyltyrosine (α-MT), but it was only partially antagonized by high doses of SCH 23390, a selective D₁ antagonist. The results indicate that chronic treatment with ADs potentiates the behavioural responses mediated by the stimulation of postsynaptic D₂ receptors in the mesolimbic system and suggest that this behavioural supersensitivity is due to enhanced neurotransmission at the D₁ receptor level.     

Autoradiographic analysis of D1 and D2 dopaminergic receptors in rat brain after paradoxical sleep deprivation

Previous work had shown that paradoxical sleep deprivation (PSD) results in potentiation of several apomorphine-induced behaviors, leading to the suggestion that PSD induces an upregulation of brain dopamine receptors. In this study, quantitative receptor autoradiography was used to verify whether PSD does, in fact, induce alterations in D₁ or D₂ receptor binding, and to investigate the regional brain specificity of such effects. After 96 h of PSD, [³H]SCH-23390 binding to D₁ receptors was examined in 30 different brain areas of 10 experimental and 10 cage control rats. [³H]Spiperone was used to label D₂ sites in adjacent tissue sections. Results revealed a 39% increase in [³H]SCH 23390 binding in the entorhinal cortex of PSD rats (p < 0.05), but no other changes in any of the remaining 29 brain areas examined. In contrast, [³H]spiperone binding was significantly elevated in the n. accumbens (+45%) and in all subrogions of the caudate-putamen (range: +13% to +23%). These results, thus, provide evidence that PSD increases D₂ but not D₁ receptor binding in brain. The present results also suggest that upregulated D₂ receptors can account for the previously reported changes in apomorphine-induced behaviors after PSD.     

Modulation of dopamine metabolism in the retina via dopamine D2 receptors

When rats are placed in a lighted environment from the dark retinal DOPAC increases. There is no significant change of retinal dopamine (DA) under either lighting condition. Blockade of aromaticl-amino acid decar☐ylase results in a more rapid accumulation of DOPA in the retina of animals in the light than in the dark implying that DA synthesis and metabolism are more rapid in the light than in the dark. Retinal DOPAC increases in the dark and in the light when rats are treated with the DA D₂ antagonists sulpiride and spiperone. Treatment with the D₂ agonist, quinpirole, lowers the content of DA in the retina of rats kept in the dark or exposed to light. D₁ receptor drugs induce only limited changes in DA metabolism. We conclude that D₂ receptors play a principal role for modulating DA synthesis and metabolism in the rat retina.     

Synergistic effects of D1 and D2 dopamine agonists on turning behaviour in rats

In rats with unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the substantia nigra, a specific D1 dopamine receptor agonist, SKF 38393A, at a dose that does not itself produce turning, significantly increased the contralateral rotation observed following a low dose of the specific D2 agonist LY 171555. Doses of SKF 38393A or the D2 agonist bromocriptine, which would themselves not induce turning, in combination produced a high rate of turning. These results suggest a synergistic interaction between D1 and D2 dopamine receptors in this system.     

Mechanism study of Aconitum-induced neurotoxicity in PC12 cells: Involvement of dopamine release and oxidative damage

The Aconitum has been widely used as an important component in traditional Chinese medicine. However, it can cause neurotoxicity, and the mechanism has not been fully elucidated. The present study aimed to investigate the potential dopaminergic neurotoxicity of Aconitum and its mechanism. We found that Aconitum significantly evoked dopamine release from cultured PC12 cells and from the nucleus accubens of mice. These results show that Aconitum can promptly trigger dopamine release both in vitro and in vivo. Aconitum exposure induced reactive oxygen species formation with the decrease of superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase. Moreover, PC12 cells proliferation was inhibited and apoptotic death was detected after Aconitum treatment, but this effect could be attenuated by antioxidants. These findings suggest that Aconitum can damage PC12 cells through oxidative stress mechanism. In conclusion, our results indicate that Aconitum can evoke dopamine release from dopaminergic neurons; excessive extracellular of dopamine can then create stresses on cellular antioxidant systems and induce neuron apoptosis.     

GTP and guanosine synergistically enhance NGF-induced neurite outgrowth from PC12 cells

Six per cent of rat pheochromocytoma (PC12) cells extended neurites (processes greater than one cell diameter in length) in the presence of 300 μM extracellular GTP or 300 μM guanosine for 48 hr, compared to only 2.5% of cells in control cultures. In the presence of 40 ng/ml of 2.5S NGF, about 20–35% of PC12 cells had neurites after 48 hr, and the addition of 300 μM guanosine or GTP together with NGF synergistically increased the proportion of cells with neurites to 40–65%. GTP and guanosine also increased the average number of branches per neurite, from 0.6 in NGF-treated cultures to 1.2 (guanosine) or 1.5 (GTP). Neurites formed after exposure to NGF alone had axonal characteristics as determined by immunocytochemistry with antibody, SMI-31, against axonal-specific polyphosphorylated neurofilament epitopes. Neurites generated with the addition of both guanosine or GTP had the same characteristics.GTP probably did not exert its effects via the P_2X or P_2Y purinoceptors because the adenine nucleotides ATP, ATPγS, ADPβS, and ADP, which are all agonists of these receptors, inhibited rather than enhanced, NGF-induced neurite outgrowth. UTP also enhanced the proportion of cells with neurites, although not to the same degree as did GTP. This may indicate activity through a P_2U-like nucleotide receptor. However, the response profile obtained, GTP > UTP ? ATP, does not fit the profile of any known P_2Y, P_2X or P_2U receptor. The poorly hydrolyzable GTP analogues, GTPγS and GDPβs were also unable to enhance the proportion of cells with neurites. This implied that GTP may produce its effects through a GTP-specific ectoenzyme or kinase. This idea was supported by results showing that another poorly hydrolyzable analogue, GMP-PCP, competitively inhibited the effects of GTP on neurite outgrowth. GTP did not exert its effects after hydrolysis to guanosine since the metabolic intermediates GDP and GMP were also ineffective in enhancing the proportion of cells with neurites. Moreover, the effects of GTP and guanosine were mutually additive, implying that these two purines utilized different signal transduction mechanisms.The effects of guanosine were not affected by the nucleoside uptake inhibitors nitrobenzylthioinosine (NBTI) and dipyridamole, indicating that a transport mechanism was not involved. Guanosine also did not activate the purinergic P₁ receptors, because the A2 receptor antagonists, 1, 3-dipropyl-7-methylxanthine (DPMX) or CGS15943, and the At receptor antagonist, 1, 3-dipropyl-8-(2-amino-4-chloro)xanthine (PACPX) did not inhibit its reaction. Therefore guanosine enhanced neurite outgrowth by a signal transduction mechanism that does not include the activation of the Pt purinoceptors.The enhancement of the neuritogenic effects of NGF by GTP and guanosine may have physiological implications in sprouting and functional recovery after neuronal injury in the CNS, due to the high levels of nucleosides and nucleotides released from dead or injured cells.     

D1 and D2 receptor modulation in rat striatum and nucleus accumbens after subchronic and chronic haloperidol treatment

The antipsychotic effects of neuroleptic drugs are believed to be achieved by chronic blockade of dopaminergic transmission in the limbic system. Nevertheless, the effects of chronic (3-12 months) haloperidol administration on the dopaminergic transmission in the nucleus accumbens of rodents remains poorly understood. Studies of spontaneous locomotor activity (SLA), a behavioral measure related to limbic dopamine transmission, and of dopamine D2 receptor density in the nucleus accumbens after chronic oral haloperidol treatment have yielded conflicting results. We evaluated these indices after 8 months of parenteral administration of haloperidol decanoate. We report here that, after 8 months of parenteral treatment, SLA stays significantly decreased and D2 receptors in the nucleus accumbens exhibit the same up-regulation as in the striatum (about 50%). These results fail to support the notion of a different pattern of D2 receptor adaptation to neuroleptic treatment between the nucleus accumbens and the striatum. In contrast, dopamine D1 receptors were found to be unaffected in the nucleus accumbens but decreased in the striatum by 22% after 8 months of treatment. This observation could be relevant to the pathogenesis of tardive dyskinesia.     

Autoradiographic studies in animal models of hemi-parkinsonism reveal dopamine D2 but not D1 receptor supersensitivity. I. 6-OHDA lesions of ascending mesencephalic dopaminergic pathways in the rat

The selective dopaminergic antagonist ligands [3H]SCH 23390 and [3H]sulpiride were used to reveal autoradiographically dopamine D1 and D2 receptors, respectively, in brain sections from rats which had received unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) injections destroying ascending nigrostriatal neurones. The binding of both ligands to striatal sections was first shown to be saturable, reversible and of high affinity and specificity [( 3H]SCH 23390: Bmax 2.16 pmol/mg protein, Kd 1.4 nM; [3H]sulpiride; Bmax 0.67 pmol/mg protein, Kd 10.7 nM). After unilateral stereotaxic 6-OHDA injections, rats rotated contralaterally when challenged with apomorphine (0.5 mg/kg), or specific D1 or D2 agonists, SKF 38393 (1.0-5.0 mg/kg) and LY 171555 (0.05-0.5 mg/kg), respectively. Loss of forebrain dopaminergic terminals was assessed autoradiographically using [3H]mazindol to label dopamine uptake sites. A loss of approximately 90-95% of uptake sites was reproducibly accompanied by an enhanced density of binding ipsilaterally for the D2 ligand, [3H]sulpiride, in all areas of the striatum, but most markedly in the lateral areas. An increase in the D2 binding site density was also seen in the ipsilateral nucleus accumbens and the olfactory tubercle. In contrast, in the same animals, the striatal D1 receptors were far less affected by dopaminergic denervation, with no consistent changes seen in the binding of [3H]SCH 23390. These results suggest that dopamine D2 receptors are more susceptible than D1 receptors to changes after dopaminergic denervation, which is expressed as an increase in the density of binding sites revealed here with [3H]sulpiride.     

Prolonged fear responses in mice lacking dopamine D1 receptor

Dopamine is an important neurotransmitter involved in learning and memory including emotional memory. The involvement of dopamine in conditioned fear has been widely documented. However, little is known about the molecular mechanisms that underlie contextual fear conditioning and memory consolidation. To address this issue, we used dopamine D₁-deficient mice (D₁−/−) and their wild-type (D₁+/+) and heterozygote (D₁+/−) siblings to assess aversive learning and memory. We quantified two different aspects of fear responses to an environment where the mice have previously received unsignaled footshocks. Using one-trial step-through passive avoidance and conditioned freezing paradigms, mice were conditioned to receive mild inescapable footshocks then tested for acquisition, retention and extinction of conditioned fear responses 5 min after and up to 45–90 days post-training. No differences were observed among any of the genotypes in the acquisition of passive avoidance response or fear-induced freezing behavior. However, with extended testing, D₁−/− mice exhibited prolonged retention and delayed extinction of conditioned fear responses in both tasks, suggesting that D₁−/− mice are capable of acquiring aversive learning normally. These findings demonstrate that the dopamine D₁ receptor is not important for acquisition or consolidation of aversive learning and memory but has an important role in modulating the extinction of fear memory.     

Radioimmunoligand characterization and immunohistochemical localization of dopamine D2 receptors on rods in the rat retina

The retinal neurotransmitter dopamine (DA), elaborated from intrinsic dopaminergic neurons as amacrine and interplexiform cells, is known to modulate several complex functions mediated by D₁ and D₂ receptors in the vertebrate retina. In this paper, we characterized and localized DA receptors of the D₂ family on rod outer segments (ROS) of the rat retina by a radioimmunoligand binding assay and by immunohistochemistry. Anti-anti-DA conjugated antibodies (or anti-idiotypic antibodies Ab₂) with used as ligand; BSA-glutaraldehyde-conjugated spiperone, eticlopride (D₂ antagonists) and DA were used as displacers. The linear Scatchard transformation indicated that data were best fit to the one-site model. By using the peroxidase-antiperoxidase technique, an intense labeling was located on rods. These results supported the paracrine action of DA on the photoreceptor cell.