Laparoscopic total gastrectomy versus open total gastrectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The possible advantages of laparoscopic (assisted) total gastrectomy (LTG) versus open total gastrectomy (OTG) have not been reviewed systematically. The aim of this study was to systematically review the short-term outcomes of LTG versus OTG in the treatment of gastric cancer.

Methods

A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Embase was conducted. All original studies comparing LTG with OTG were included for critical appraisal. Data describing short-term outcomes were pooled and analyzed.

Results

A total of eight original studies that compared LTG (n = 314) with OTG (n = 384) in patients with gastric cancer fulfilled quality criteria and were selected for review and meta-analysis. LTG compared with OTG was associated with a significant reduction of intraoperative blood loss (weighted mean difference = 227.6 ml; 95 % CI 144.3–310.9; p < 0.001), a reduced risk of postoperative complications (risk ratio = 0.51; 95 % CI 0.33–0.77), and shorter hospital stay (weighted mean difference 4.0 = days; 95 % CI 1.4–6.5; p < 0.001). These benefits were at the cost of longer operative time (weighted mean difference = 55.5 min; 95 % CI 24.8–86.2; p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality rates were comparable for LTG (0.9 %) and OTG (1.8 %) (risk ratio = 0.68; 95 % CI 0.20–2.36).

Conclusion

LTG shows better short term outcomes compared with OTG in eligible patients with gastric cancer. Future studies should evaluate 30- and 60-day mortality, radicality of resection, and long-term follow-up in LTG versus OTG, preferably in randomized trials.     

Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy and open total gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients

Background

Laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) has been used more frequently despite the associated technical difficulty and concerns over oncological safety. This study was undertaken to compare the short- and long-term surgical outcomes following either LATG or open total gastrectomy (OTG) for gastric cancer.

Methods

A total of 120 LATG and 228 OTG were retrospectively matched with respect to sex, age (±5 years), and pathological tumor-node-metastasis stage for comparison of the clinical outcomes.

Results

The total complication rate among 120 LATG and 228 OTG was 18.3 % (22/120) and 16.2 % (37/228), respectively. The most common complication after LATG was anastomotic-related complication (6.7 %); five anastomotic leakages (4.2 %) and three anastomotic strictures were reported (2.5 %). That after OTG was wound complication (3.5 %), including seroma or infection. Matched patients analysis: Time to first gas passing and time to the resumption of a soft diet were significantly shorter in the LATG group than in the OTG group. The postoperative hospital stay of LATG was shorter in the LATG group (9.3 ± 4.2 days) than in the OTG group (11.7 ± 7.3 days; p = 0.057). Among matched patients, there was no significant difference between complication rate (24 vs. 32 %; p = 0.504) or leakage rate (6 vs. 4 %). During median follow-up of 50 (range, 10–92) months, there was no significant difference in the disease-free survival rate between the matched groups, respectively (94.5 vs. 87.1 %: p = 0.148). As for patients with TNM stage I gastric cancer, the disease-free survival rate (100 vs. 90.9 %; p = 0.5) and the cumulative survival rate (91.5 vs. 95.2 %; p = 0.618) did not differ significantly between the LATG and OTG groups.

Conclusions

LATG for gastric cancer has the advantage over an OTG in terms of better short-term outcomes and similar long-term outcome. LATG is an acceptable alternative to OTG for the treatment of gastric cancer.     

Laparoscopy-assisted pancreas- and spleen-preserving total gastrectomy for gastric cancer as compared with open total gastrectomy

Background

Laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) is not widely used for the treatment of gastric cancer located in the upper or middle third of the stomach. To assess the safety and usefulness of LATG, we compared the outcomes of LATG with those of open total gastrectomy (OTG).

Methods

From July 2004 to July 2007, we performed pancreas- and spleen-preserving total gastrectomy with D1 + β or D2 lymph-node dissection and Roux-en-Y reconstruction in 74 patients with cancer located in the upper or middle third of the stomach. Of these patients, 30 underwent LATG (LATG group) and 44 underwent OTG (OTG group). Short-term outcomes were compared between the groups.

Results

Operation time was significantly longer in the LATG group than in the OTG group (313 min vs. 218 min, p < 0.001). Blood loss (134 g vs. 407 g, p < 0.001) and the rate of the use of analgesics (6.8 times vs. 11.8 times, p < 0.05) were significantly lower, and postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LATG group than in the OTG group (13.5 days vs. 18.2 days, p < 0.05). The LATG group had better hematologic and serum chemical profiles, including white-cell counts, C-reactive protein levels, total protein levels, and albumin levels, as well as lower rate of postoperative body-weight loss. The number of dissected lymph nodes (43.2 vs. 51.2, p = 0.098) and the rate of postoperative complications (20.0% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.287) were similar in the groups. However, major complications such as anastomotic leakage, abdominal abscess, and pancreatic leakage occurred in six patients (13.6%) in the OTG group, but in none of the patients in the LATG group.

Conclusions

LATG is associated with less severe complications and better postoperative quality of life than OTG. We believe that LATG is a safe, useful, and less invasive alternative for the treatment of gastric cancer located in the upper or middle third of the stomach.     

Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy: a matched-cohort study

Background

This study was designed to compare short-term laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) with open total gastrectomy (OTG) outcomes in gastric cancer.

Methods

Seventy patients who underwent total gastrectomy via LTG or OTG were included. All cases were matched for stage, age, and sex by means of statistically generated selection of all gastrectomies performed during the same period.

Results

Although the operation time was not longer for LTG, the time required for esophagojejunostomy was significantly longer in LTG than in OTG (43 vs 14 min, P < .05). The incidence of anastomotic complications was higher in the LTG group as well.

Conclusions

Postoperative complications such as anastomotic leakage and stenosis were observed more frequently in LTG. To improve the safety of esophagojejunostomy in LTG, technical innovations should be pursued.     

Short-term surgical outcomes and operative risks of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric carcinoma: experience at a large-volume center

Background

Despite the popularity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG), laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) remains a challenging procedure because of its technical difficulties and possible complications. In this study, the authors evaluated the short-term surgical outcomes and operative risks of LTG.

Methods

The records of 118 patients who underwent LTG for middle or upper gastric cancer were retrieved from a prospectively constructed database of 1,064 patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy between 2007 and 2011. Surgical outcomes of LTG, such as operative results, postoperative courses, morbidities, and mortality, were investigated and compared with those of LDG patients.

Results

Of the 118 LTG patients, one underwent open conversion and three experienced an intraoperative complication. Mean operating time was 292?±?88?min, and the mean total number of harvested lymph nodes was 41?±?16. As compared with the LDG group, the LTG group had a significantly longer operation time (292 vs. 220?min, p?<?0.001), and significantly more intraoperative blood loss (256 vs. 191?ml, p?=?0.002). The overall morbidity rate after LTG was 22.9?%, which was significantly higher than after LDG (12.7?%, p?=?0.002). There were two postoperative mortalities in the LTG group. The most common complications after LTG were anastomosis leakage (n?=?9) and luminal bleeding (n?=?9), which were followed by anastomosis stricture (n?=?4) and abdominal infection (n?=?3). Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that old age [??60?years, odds ratio (OR)?=?2.55, 95?% confidence interval (CI)?=?0.95?C6.84], intraoperative blood loss >200?ml (OR?=?3.33, 95?% CI?=?1.14?C9.70), and D2 lymphadenectomy (OR?=?3.87, 95?% CI?=?1.30?C11.55) were independent risk factors for postoperative complications after LTG.

Conclusions

LTG is a feasible and acceptable procedure for treatment of middle or upper early gastric cancer. Further refinement of anastomosis techniques and considerable experience of laparoscopic gastrectomy are required for proper application of LTG in gastric carcinoma.     

Early results of a modified splenic hilar lymphadenectomy in laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy for gastric cancer with stage cT1-2: a case–control study

Background

The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility and early outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy with a modified splenic hilar lymphadenectomy for upper- and middle-third stage cT1-2 gastric cancer.

Methods

A total of 97 patients diagnosed with upper- and middle-third stage cT1-T2 gastric cancer were enrolled. Patients were assigned to the laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy group (LATG, n = 41) or the open total gastrectomy group (OTG, n = 56). All patients underwent total gastrectomy with modified splenic hilar lymphadenectomy. The operative and postoperative measures, number of retrieved lymph nodes (LNs), and complications were compared between the two groups.

Results

The mean number of dissected LNs was not significantly different between the two groups: 23.1 ± 8.0 in the LATG group versus 24.2 ± 7.5 in the OTG group. Compared with the OTG group, the LATG group had less operative blood loss [104.2 ± 42.9 vs. 355.6 ± 51.3 ml (p < 0.0001)], shorter time to out-of-bed activities [14.4 ± 3.2 vs. 16.5 ± 1.2 h (p < 0.0001)], shorter time to first flatus [72.2 ± 16.2 vs. 78.4 ± 8.6 h (p = 0.017)], earlier resumption of soft diet [52.8 ± 21.6 vs. 74.2 ± 12.2 h (p < 0.0001)], and shorter postoperative hospital stay [9.7 ± 2.2 vs. 13.6 ± 3.6 days (p < 0.0001)]. However, LATG had a slightly longer operating time than OTG [235.7 ± 38.5 vs. 211.5 ± 33.2 min (p = 0.001)]. The operative complications rates for the LATG and OTG groups were not significantly different: 4.9 versus 5.4 %.

Conclusion

For upper- and middle-third stage cT1-2 gastric cancer, a limited splenic hilar lymphadenectomy strategy seems to be safe and feasible, particularly for the number of retrieved LNs. However, this technique is not suitable for cT3 disease.     

Minimally invasive surgery for remnant gastric cancer: a comparison with open surgery

Background

Completion total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is technically challenging, especially using the minimally invasive approach. Only a few small case series have reported the technical feasibility of completion total gastrectomy by minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of MIS and open surgery for RGC.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 76 completion total gastrectomies for RGC between 2005 and 2012. Indications for MIS were limited to no evidence of serosa invasion or lymph node metastasis to extraperigastric areas on preoperative evaluation. We compared patient characteristics, intraoperative factors, post-operative outcomes, and survival for the MIS and open surgery groups.

Results

Eighteen patients underwent completion total gastrectomy with MIS (10 laparoscopic, 8 robotic) and 58 patients underwent open surgery. Operation time was longer in the MIS than the open group (266 vs. 203 min, P = 0.004), but the groups had similar estimated blood loss, frequency of unplanned other organ resection, and number of retrieved lymph nodes. The MIS group had a significantly earlier initiation of soft diet, shorter hospital stay, and fewer pain medication injections. Complication rates, recurrence, and overall 5-year survival were similar for the two groups. When we compared laparoscopy with robotic, similar result was shown in all parameters except operation time.

Conclusions

Compared to open surgery, MIS for RGC demonstrated better short-term outcome and comparable oncologic results. MIS for RGC is feasible and safe and maintains advantages of minimal invasiveness. Both laparoscopic and robotic approaches are reasonable to the management of RGC.     

Laparoscopy-Assisted vs. Open Total Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: Long-Term Outcomes and Technical Aspects of a Case–Control Study

Background and Objectives

An increasing number of studies comparing laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and conventional open distal gastrectomy have been reported; the technical feasibility and clinical efficacy have been confirmed. However, few data are available to compare laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) and open techniques for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The aim of this study is to compare the oncologic efficacy and long-term outcomes of LATG vs. open total gastrectomy (OTG) for AGC and to provide our experiences regarding these surgical difficulties as well.

Methods

Using data from a clinical database of all operations performed in our department by a special surgical team, we retrospectively analysed data from 117 cases of LATG and matched OTG performed between January 2004 and December 2010. This analysis was a case–control study in which patients in the two groups were matched according to tumour location, age, gender, BMI and TNM stage via a propensity score matching method. Patient clinical characteristics, lymph node retrieval, early postoperative complications, recurrence and long-term outcomes were compared.

Results

The demographics, preoperative data and characteristics of the tumour were similar in both groups. No significant differences were found in the LATG group compared with the OTG group with regard to the number of retrieved lymph nodes or distance from the proximal margin. Operating time was longer in the LATG group than in the OTG group (292.8?±?49.5 vs. 242.1?±?47.4, p?<?0.05). Significant differences were found between LATG and OTG with regard to blood loss, postoperative hospitalisation and times of analgesic injection. The early postoperative complication rates in the LATG group were significantly lower than in the OTG group (11.1 vs. 16.3 %, p?<?0.05). Operative mortality was zero in both groups. During a median follow-up of 61.2 (range, 6–84)?months, the overall 5-year survival rates in the LATG group and OTG group were 49.3 and 46.5 %, respectively; there was no significant difference between the two groups (p?=?0.756).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that LATG is technically feasible for advanced gastric cancer patients and can yield good short- and long-term oncologic outcomes as compared with conventional OTG.     

Prognostic Significance of Non-curative Gastrectomy for Incurable Gastric Carcinoma

Background

To date, there is no convincing evidence regarding the benefits of non-curative gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. In the present study, we reviewed the outcomes of patients who underwent surgery for incurable gastric carcinoma and evaluated the prognostic significance of non-curative gastrectomy.

Methods

Between 2004 and 2011, a total of 197 patients undergoing elective surgery for incurable gastric carcinoma were divided into the gastric resection and non-resection groups. Patient survival was compared between the two groups, and the prognostic significance of non-curative gastrectomy was investigated using multivariate analysis.

Results

Overall, 162 (82.2 %) patients underwent non-curative gastrectomy with morbidity and mortality of 21.0 and 1.2 %, respectively. The median survival of patients undergoing non-curative gastrectomy was significantly longer than that of patients without gastrectomy (12.4 vs. 7.1 months, p = 0.003). Patients who received postoperative chemotherapy also showed significantly better survival than those without chemotherapy (13.2 vs. 4.3 months, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that non-curative gastrectomy was an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio 0.61, 95 % CI 0.40–0.93, p = 0.023) after adjusting for postoperative chemotherapy and other clinical factors. Median survival in patients receiving non-curative gastrectomy combined with postoperative chemotherapy was 13.9 months, which was significantly longer than gastrectomy alone (5.4 months), chemotherapy alone (9.6 months), and no treatment (3.2 months) (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Primary tumor resection and postoperative chemotherapy are the most important prognostic factors for incurable gastric carcinoma. The survival benefits of non-curative gastrectomy need to be confirmed in a large-scale, randomized trial.     

Clinicopathological Characteristics of Remnant Gastric Cancer After a Distal Gastrectomy

Introduction

The survival rate of patients with remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is unfavorable in comparison to that of cancer in the nonresected stomach. However, when RGC is curatively resected, no significant differences have been reported between both groups in regard to survival. The aim of this study is to analyze the clinicopathological factors influencing a curative resection of RGC.

Methods

Thirty-eight consecutive patients with RGC from January 1, 1994 through March 31, 2009 were enrolled in this retrospective study.

Results

Their primary diseases were gastric cancers (21; 55.3%) and benign diseases (17; 44.7%). The type of the reconstruction methods of first gastrectomy were Billroth I (28; 73.7%) and Billroth II (10; 26.3%). A total of 31 patients underwent a laparotomy. Twenty patients underwent a curative resection, four patients underwent a palliative resection, and seven underwent a nonresective operation. A total of seven patients underwent an endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer, and all patients received a curative resection. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the clinicopathological and background factors influencing a curative resection of RGC. A multivariate analysis revealed only an annual follow-up endoscopic examination after the initial gastrectomy to be an independent factor for a curative resection (p?=?0.016; odds ratio, 35.3).

Conclusions

An annual follow-up endoscopic examination an after initial gastrectomy may be related to improving the prognosis of patients with RGC.     

Differences of the Lymphatic Distribution and Surgical Outcomes Between Remnant Gastric Cancers and Primary Proximal Gastric Cancers

Background

Although remnant gastric cancer (RGC) following distal gastrectomy is located in the proximal stomach, little is known about the differences of the lymphatic distribution and surgical outcomes between RGC and primary proximal gastric cancer (PGC).

Methods

Between 1997 and 2008, 1,149 patients underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Of these, 33 (2.9%) RGC patients and 207 (18.5%) PGC patients were treated at our department. We reviewed their hospital records retrospectively.

Results

Compared with the PGC patients, those with RGC had a slightly higher age at onset (p?=?0.09), higher incidence of undifferentiated cancer (p?=?0.06), higher incidence of vascular invasion (p?=?0.09), and higher incidence of T4 (p?=?0.07). Gastrectomy for RGC involved greater blood loss (p?p?=?0.01), combined resection, and high incidence of complications. However, the survival rate for RGC patients was similar to that for PGC patients (p?=?0.67). 2) Patients with RGC had a different pattern of lymph node metastasis compared with that in PGC. Particularly in advanced RGC with pT2?CT4 tumors, RGC frequently demonstrated jejunal mesentery lymph node metastases (RGC vs. PGC, 35% vs. 0%) and splenic hilar lymph node metastases (RGC vs. PGC, 17% vs. 10%). The jejunal mesentery lymph node metastases were detected only following Billroth II reconstruction (Billroth I vs. Billroth II, 0% vs. 67%).

Conclusion

Although the clinical behaviors of the two gastric cancers were different, the survival rates were similar. The pattern of metastasis indicates that the jejunal mesentery and splenic hilar lymph nodes should be specifically targeted for en bloc resection during complete gastrectomy in RGC.     

Evaluation of the Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy in Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer Patients

Background

This retrospective study was designed to assess the feasibility of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) in clinical stage I gastric cancer patients, and validate the appropriateness of the widespread adoption of LTG for experienced open surgeons.

Methods

Eighty-eight patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer underwent LTG in our hospitals (n = 55) and affiliated hospitals (n = 33). Esophagojejunostomy was performed intracoporeally using a circular stapler with an incision in the left upper abdomen. We investigated the patients’ clinicopathologic factor, and evaluated the effect of hospital volume on short-term outcomes.

Results

Fixed insertion of the anvil head was successfully achieved in all patients (lift-up method in 58 patients and transoral method in 28 patients), although 2 patients were converted to open surgery. The approach using a circular stapler through a small incision from the upper left quadrant of the abdomen facilitated a good laparoscopic visual field for the plane of the esophagojejunostomy. Fourteen patients developed Clavien–Dindo classification grade II or more postoperative complications, and the overall operative morbidity rate was 15.9 %. No anastomotic leakage was encountered in this series. No significant difference was observed in clinical outcomes between patients in the high- and low-volume hospital groups.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic total gastrectomy can be performed safely on clinical stage I gastric cancer patients by surgeons with sufficient experience in open gastrectomy and therefore represents a feasible procedure that is not clinically impacted by hospital volume.

     

Vitamin E Deficiency Begins within 6 Months after Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Background

To clarify factors related to vitamin E malabsorption after gastric surgery, we evaluated serum vitamin E levels in patients who had undergone gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Methods

We studied 39 patients (26 men, 13 women; mean age, 61.7 years) who underwent gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Surgical procedures included 24 subtotal gastrectomies and 15 total gastrectomies. We measured serum levels of vitamin E before and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after gastrectomy. A level of less than 0.75 mg/dl was defined as a low vitamin E level.

Results

Serum vitamin E levels decreased to less than 0.75 mg/dl in 6 (15.4 %) of the 39 patients within 6 months after gastrectomy and in 7 (17.9 %) of the 39 patients within 1 year after gastrectomy. The proportion of patients with a low serum vitamin E level was significantly higher in the total gastrectomy group (p = 0.002). A low vitamin E level was significantly associated with a low total cholesterol level. Total cholesterol levels in low vitamin E levels patients were lower than normal vitamin E levels patients. None of the patients with a low vitamin E level had neuropathy.

Conclusions

The type of operation performed (total vs. subtotal gastrectomy) may be the major cause of vitamin E malabsorption after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Vitamin E deficiency probably begins within 6 months after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.     

Feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Background

Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LG) is an established treatment for early gastric cancer. However, carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic surgery can adversely affect the pulmonary function of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This retrospective cohort study was performed to assess the feasibility of LG for patients with COPD.

Methods

Among 1,053 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy with lymph node dissection between 1999 and 2011 at the authors’ hospital, 220 patients with COPD were studied retrospectively. The clinical outcomes for the patients with COPD who underwent LG (LG group) were compared with those of COPD patients who underwent open gastrectomy (OG group), as well as those of patients with no operative risk and normal pulmonary function who underwent LG (NOR group). Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) were defined as pneumonia, atelectasis, pneumothorax, prolonged mechanical ventilation (>24 h), and adult respiratory distress syndrome within 30 days after operation.

Results

Pulmonary function variables were similar in the LG and OG groups. The findings showed PPCs to be slightly but not significantly less frequent in the LG group (1.7 %) than in the OG group (6.3 %) (p = 0.09). No difference in PPCs was found between the LG group and the NOR group (p > 0.99). For patients with COPD, advanced stage (stage 2 or 3 vs stage 1) was significantly associated with PPCs (p = 0.03), but was not an independent risk factor for PPCs (p = 0.12).

Conclusion

The LG procedure is tolerated in patients with gastric cancer who have mild or moderate COPD, similar to OG.     

Minimally invasive surgical approach for the treatment of gastroparesis

Background

Gastroparesis is a chronic disorder resulting in decreased quality of life. The gastric electrical stimulator (GES) is an alternative to gastrectomy in patients with medically refractory gastroparesis. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of patients treated with the gastric stimulator versus patients treated with laparoscopic subtotal or total gastrectomy.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients who had surgical treatment of gastroparesis from January 2003 to January 2012. Postoperative outcomes were analyzed and symptoms were assessed with the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI).

Results

There were 103 patients: 72 patients (26 male/46 female) with a GES, implanted either with laparoscopy (n = 20) or mini-incision (n = 52), and 31 patients (9 male/22 female) who underwent laparoscopic subtotal (n = 27), total (n = 1), or completion gastrectomy (n = 3). Thirty-day morbidity rate (8.3 % vs. 23 %, p = 0.06) and in-hospital mortality rate (2.7 % vs. 3 %, p = 1.00) were similar for GES and gastrectomy. There were 19 failures (26 %) in the group of GES patients; of these, 13 patients were switched to a subtotal gastrectomy for persistent symptoms (morbidity rate 7.7 %, mortality 0). In total, 57 % of patients were treated with GES while only 43 % had final treatment with gastrectomy. Of the GES group, 63 % rated their symptoms as improved versus 87 % in the primary gastrectomy group (p = 0.02). The patients who were switched from GES to secondary laparoscopic gastrectomy had 100 % symptom improvement. The median total GCSI score did not show a difference between the procedures (p = 0.12).

Conclusion

The gastric electrical stimulator is an effective treatment for medically refractory gastroparesis. Laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy should also be considered as one of the primary surgical treatments for gastroparesis given the significantly higher rate of symptomatic improvement with acceptable morbidity and comparable mortality. Furthermore, the gastric stimulator patients who have no improvement of symptoms can be successfully treated by laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy.     

A propensity score–matched case–control comparative study of laparoscopic and open extended (D2) lymph node dissection for distal gastric carcinoma

Background

Technical proficiency at laparoscopic D2 lymph node dissection (LND) is essential for extending the use of laparoscopic surgery beyond the treatment of early gastric cancer (EGC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the technical and oncological feasibility of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) with D2 LND for distal gastric cancer.

Methods

Of 922 patients who underwent open or LDG with D2 LND for gastric carcinoma, 133 treated by LDG and 133 treated by open distal gastrectomy (ODG) were selected using the propensity score matching method. The short-term surgical outcomes and long-term survivals of these matched groups were compared.

Results

The two study groups were well matched with respect to age, sex, body mass index, comorbidity, ASA score, abdominal operation history, and tumor stage. The LDG group had a significantly longer mean operating time (227 vs. 161 min, p < 0.001) but showed significantly less intraoperative blood loss (149 vs. 189 ml, p = 0.007). Total numbers of collected lymph nodes were similar in the two groups. Postoperatively, no significant intergroup differences were found for hospital stay, morbidity, or mortality. Furthermore, overall survivals were similar in the two groups (p = 0.621). Multivariate analysis showed that male gender, age ≥70 years, and intraoperative blood loss of ≥200 ml were independent risk factors of postoperative morbidity.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic D2 LND for distal gastric cancer is technically safe and feasible compared with ODG. A prospective randomized trial is warranted to evaluate long-term oncological outcomes in advanced gastric carcinoma.     

National outcomes and uptake of laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer in England

Background

Gastrectomy remains the mainstay of curative treatment for gastric cancer, yet it is associated with significant postoperative mortality. The laparoscopic approach has been introduced in an attempt to improve surgical outcomes. This study examines the uptake of laparoscopic gastrectomy in England and quantifies postoperative mortality and morbidity following gastrectomy for cancer.

Methods

A population-based study of a national administrative database was undertaken. Patients undergoing gastrectomy for cancer in any National Health Services hospital in England between April 2000 and March 2010 were included. The main outcome measures were mortality, morbidity and length of stay.

Results

A total of 10,713 patients underwent gastrectomy, of which 10,233 (95.5 %) underwent open gastrectomy (OG), and 480 (4.5 %) underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG). There was no significant difference in 30-day in-hospital mortality between OG and LG (5.6 % vs. 4.8 %; p = 0.461). Medical complications occurred in 2,311 (22.6 %) and 120 (25 %) patients from OG and LG groups respectively (p = 0.217). Patients in the LG groups had a shorter hospital stay than OG with median (interquartile range) of 11 (8–17) versus 14 (11–19) days respectively (p < 0.001). Readmission and reoperation rates were 10.2 versus 12.1 % (p = 0.175) and 4 versus 4.6 % (p = 0.523) for OG and LG respectively.

Conclusions

LG is increasingly being performed in England. Postoperative morbidity and mortality of LG is similar to that of OG, but it is associated with a shorter hospital stay. Data from randomised controlled trials evaluating long term survival and patients’ reported outcomes are essential before the final judgement on the value of LG in the management of gastric cancer.     

Metallic Stent Placement in Patients with Recurrent Malignant Obstruction in the Surgically Altered Stomach

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the technical feasibility and clinical effectiveness of expandable metallic stent placement in 196 patients with recurrent malignant obstruction in their surgically altered stomach.

Methods

The 196 patients were treated using five different types of gastric surgery performed for gastric cancer: total gastrectomy (type 1) in 73 patients; distal gastrectomy with gastroduodenostomy (type 2) in 39 patients; distal gastrectomy with a Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy (type 3) in 21 patients; distal gastrectomy with a gastrojejunostomy (type 4) in 49 patients; and palliative gastrojejunostomy for unresectable gastric cancer (type 5) in 14 patients. The technical and clinical success rates, complications, dysphagia score, and influence of chemotherapy were evaluated and the complications compared between the two stent types. The overall survival and stent patency were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

Stent placement was technically successful in 192 of 196 patients (97.9 %), with 184 of the 192 patients (95.8 %) showing symptomatic improvement. The mean dysphagia score improved from 3.24 ± 0.64 to 1.48 ± 0.82 (p < 0.001). The complication rate was 25 %. The incidence of stent migration was significantly higher in fully covered stents and in patients who underwent chemotherapy (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). Chemotherapy was significantly associated with an increase of survival (p < 0.001). The median survival and stent patency were 131 and 90 days, respectively.

Conclusion

Placement of expandable metallic stents in patients with recurrent cancer after a surgically altered stomach is technically feasible and clinically effective. Chemotherapy was associated with increased stent migration and prolonged survival.     

Risk Factors Associated with Complication Following Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Retrospective Analysis of Prospectively Collected Data Based on the Clavien–Dindo System

Background

Most studies about complication after gastric cancer surgery have been performed without consideration of the severity of each complication. The purposes of this study were to prospectively analyze all postgastrectomy complications according to severity using Clavien–Dindo classification and to identify risk factors related to postoperative complications.

Methods

Complication data were collected prospectively through weekly conferences with all gastric adenocarcinoma patients who underwent gastrectomy between March 2011 and February 2012 at Seoul National University Hospital. Complications were categorized according to the Clavien–Dindo classification.

Results

Out of the 881 patients who underwent gastrectomy, there were 254 events in 197 patients (22.4 %). The numbers of grade I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, and V complications according to the Clavien–Dindo classification were 71 (8.1 %), 58 (6.6 %), 108 (12.3 %), 8 (0.9 %), 5 (0.6 %), and 4 (0.5 %), respectively. Extended gastrectomy (odds ratio [OR], 3.92; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.96–7.82, p?<?0.001), total gastrectomy (OR, 1.97; 95 % CI, 1.24–3.14, p?=?0.004), and age of 60 years or more (OR, 1.66; 95 % CI, 1.15–2.38, p?=?0.007) were found to be significant independent risk factors for overall complications of gastrectomy. These three factors were also risk factors for the complications of grade IIIa or over and local and systemic complications. In addition, ASA 3 or 4 and moderate or severe malnutrition as well as those three factors were risk factors for systemic complications.

Conclusion

Age and the extent of gastrectomy were revealed as the prognostic factors for overall complications and the complications of grade IIIa or over according to the Clavien–Dindo classification following gastrectomy for gastric cancer.     

Advantages of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy over laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Background

Laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer has become common due to improvement of the surgical techniques and devices for laparoscopic surgery. Although laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) has several advantages over open distal gastrectomy, little has been reported about the safety and feasibility of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG).

Methods

Between October 2005 and June 2007, 80 laparoscopic distal gastrectomies with regional lymphadenectomies were performed for patients with gastric cancer. After 24 patients underwent LADG and 56 patients underwent TLDG, the clinical data were compared between the two groups.

Results

The groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, body mass index (BMI), tumor location, tumor size, macroscopic type, depth of invasion, histologic type, lymph node metastasis, and length of proximal margin. However, when only the patients with gastric cancer in the middle third of the stomach were compared between the two groups, the length of the proximal margin was significantly longer in the TLDG group (p < 0.05). The mean blood loss was significantly less in the TLDG group (p < 0.05). The patients in the TLDG group recovered earlier and thus had a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay. Furthermore, the C-reactive protein level on postoperative day 7 was lower in the TLDG group than in the LADG group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the postoperative complications between the two groups.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that TLDG has several advantages over LADG including smaller wounds, less invasiveness, and better feasibility of a secure ablation. The TLDG procedure yields safe anastomosis independently of the patient’s constitution or the location of the cancer. Therefore, TLDG is considered to be a useful technique for patients with gastric cancer.