Home-based versus hospital-based postnatal care: a randomised trial

OBJECTIVE: To compare a shortened hospital stay with midwife visits at home to usual hospital care after delivery. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Maternity unit of a Swiss teaching hospital. POPULATION: Four hundred and fifty-nine women with a single uncomplicated pregnancy at low risk of caesarean section. METHODS: Women were randomised to either home-based (n= 228) or hospital-based postnatal care (n= 231). Home-based postnatal care consisted of early discharge from hospital (24 to 48 hours after delivery) and home visits by a midwife; women in the hospital-based care group were hospitalised for four to five days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Breastfeeding 28 days postpartum, women's views of their care and readmission to hospital. RESULTS: Women in the home-based care group had shorter hospital stays (65 vs 106 hours, P < 0.001) and more midwife visits (4.8 vs 1.7, P < 0.001) than women in the hospital-based care group. Prevalence of breastfeeding at 28 days was similar between the groups (90%vs 87%, P= 0.30), but women in the home-based care group reported fewer problems with breastfeeding and greater satisfaction with the help received. There were no differences in satisfaction with care, women's hospital readmissions, postnatal depression scores and health status scores. A higher percentage of neonates in the home-based care group were readmitted to hospital during the first six months (12%vs 4.8%, P= 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In low risk pregnancies, early discharge from hospital and midwife visits at home after delivery is an acceptable alternative to a longer duration of care in hospital. Mothers' preferences and economic considerations should be taken into account when choosing a policy of postnatal care.     

Contraceptive practices and intentions of Ukrainian women.

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to investigate contraceptive practices and factors behind contraceptive preferences among Ukrainian women attending for abortion or gynecological health check-up. METHODS: Women attending for abortion (n = 919) and healthy non-pregnant women (n = 297) were studied by an anonymous 192-item self-questionnaire in a hospital-based unmatched case-control design. RESULTS: The average number of abortions per woman rose with age to 4.6 in the abortion group and 2.4 abortions in the non-pregnant group. In the abortion and non-pregnant groups, no contraceptive use during the past year was reported by 27% and 20% and at the time of conception or during the previous month, by 61% and 51%, respectively. Nevertheless, no intention to use contraception in the future was reported by 15% and 8% of women, respectively. A history of previous childbirth (odds ratio (OR) = 1.8), at least two induced abortions (OR = 1.7) and sexual education obtained from literature (OR = 1.8) were associated with preference to use modern contraceptives. Intention to use no contraception in the future was associated with giving no answer about acceptance of abortion as a birth control method (OR = 5.4), uncertainty whether to use abortion or an intrauterine device in a situation of choice (OR = 1.8), low income (OR = 1.9) and no answer about housing situation (OR = 3.9). Lack of experience with contraception reduced the intention to use any method in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Better reproductive education/information and economic incentives could contribute to a change from abortion to use of contraception.     

Unwanted pregnancies,unwanted births,consequences and unmet needs

Worldwide women have to cope up with heavy burden of unwanted pregnancies, mistimed, unplanned, with risk to their health. Their children and families also suffer. Such pregnancies are root cause of induced abortions (safe/unsafe) and grave consequences. Women, their partners can, for most part, prevent unwanted pregnancies by using contraceptives. However many women either do not use any contraceptive or use methods, with high failure rates. These women account for 82% of pregnancies that are not desired. Remaining unintended pregnancies occur among women who use modern contraceptive, either because they had difficulty using method consistently or because of failure. Helping women, their partner use modern contraceptives effectively is essential in achieving Millennium Development Goals for improving women’s health, reducing poverty. If all women in developing countries use modern contraceptives, there would be 22 million less unplanned births, 25 million fewer induced, 15 million fewer unsafe abortions, 90000 less maternal deaths and 390000 less children losing their mothers. Also making abortion services broadly legal, by understanding size, type of unmet needs, most important by creating awareness in communities can surely help tackle this problem to a large extent.     

Therapeutic abortion follow-up study

To determine the long-range psychological effects of therapeutic abortion, 50 women (aged from 13-44 years), who were granted abortions between 1967 and 1968 Because of possible impairment of mental and/or physical health, were analyzed by use of demographic questionnaires, psychological tests, and interviews. Testing revealed that 44 women had psychiatric problems at time of abortion. 43 patients were followed for 3-6 months. The follow-up interviews revealed that 29 patients reacted positively after abortion, 10 reported no significant change and 4 reacted negatively. 37 would definitely repeat the abortion. Women under 21 years of age felt substantially more ambivalent and guilty than older patients. A study of 36 paired pre- and post-abortion profiles showed that 15 initially abnormal tests had become normal. There was a significant increase in contraceptive use among the patients after the abortion, but 4 again became pregnant and 8 were apparently without consistent contraception. It is concluded that the abortions were therapeutic, but physicians are encouraged to be aware of psychological problems in abortion cases. Strong psychological and contraceptive counselling should be exercised.     

Maternal mortality and unsafe abortion

Unsafe abortions refer to terminations of unintended pregnancies by persons lacking the necessary skills, or in an environment lacking the minimum medical standards, or both. Globally, unsafe abortions account for 67,900 maternal deaths annually (13% of total maternal mortality) and contribute to significant morbidity among women, especially in under-resourced settings. The determinants of unsafe abortion include restrictive abortion legislation, lack of female empowerment, poor social support, inadequate contraceptive services and poor health-service infrastructure. Deaths from unsafe abortion are preventable by addressing the above determinants and by the provision of safe, accessible abortion care. This includes safe medical or surgical methods for termination of pregnancy and management of incomplete abortion by skilled personnel. The service must also include provision of emergency medical or surgical care in women with severe abortion complications. Developing appropriate services at the primary level of care with a functioning referral system and the inclusion of post abortion contraceptive care with counseling are essential facets of abortion care.     

Repeat induced abortions and contraceptive practices among unmarried young women seeking an abortion in China.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rates of repeated abortion and contraceptive use among unmarried young women seeking an abortion in China. METHODS: We used an anonymous self-administered questionnaire at abortion clinics in Beijing, Changsha, and Dalian from January to September 2000. RESULTS: Of 4547 unmarried young women seeking an abortion, 33.0% reported having had one previous induced abortion. Of those who had had more than one abortion, only 29.7% used a contraceptive method at their first sexual intercourse after the procedure; and of the 446 women who chose contraception, 41.3% used the traditional methods of withdrawal or rhythm. Although 65.0% of the young women had used condoms at least once, only 9.6% did so consistently and correctly; 47.7% of the current pregnancies were associated with nonuse of any contraceptive, and 52.3% were related to contraceptive failure. CONCLUSION: The rate of unmarried young women seeking repeated abortions was high in China on 2000. The rate of consistent condom use was low, and the rate of contraceptive failure was higher.     

Unsafe abortion differentials in 2008 by age and developing country region: high burden among young women

Each year, nearly 22 million women worldwide have an unsafe abortion, almost all of which occur in developing countries. This paper estimates the incidence and rates of unsafe abortion by five-year age groups among women aged 15-44 years in developing country regions in 2008. Forty-one per cent of unsafe abortions in developing regions are among young women aged 15-24 years, 15% among those aged 15-19 years and 26% among those aged 20-24 years. Among the 3.2 million unsafe abortions in young women 15-19 years old, almost 50% are in the Africa region. 22% of all unsafe abortions in Africa compared to 11% of those in Asia (excluding Eastern Asia) and 16% of those in Latin America and the Caribbean are among adolescents aged 15-19 years. The number of adolescent women globally is approaching 300 million. Adolescents suffer the most from the negative consequences of unsafe abortion. Efforts are urgently needed to provide contraceptive information and services to adolescents, who have a high unmet need for family planning, and to women of all ages, with interventions tailored by age group. Efforts to make abortion safe in developing countries are also urgently needed.     

Spontaneous abortion: a prospective cohort study of younger women from the general population in Denmark. Validation, occurrence and risk determinants

OBJECTIVE: To assess the occurrence of spontaneous abortion, comparing two different data sources. To estimate the rate of spontaneous abortion over a 2-year period, and examine potential predictors of the risk for incident spontaneous abortion. METHODS: We used interview data from a population-based prospective cohort study comprising 11,088 women and data from a linkage of the cohort with the Hospital Discharge Register to compare spontaneous abortions as reported in the interview with those identified in the register. Based on interview data, we estimated the rate of spontaneous abortion during the two-year follow-up. Finally, risk determinants for incident spontaneous abortion were analyzed by means of logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 654 spontaneous abortions before enrolment in the study were reported by the women compared to 531 abortions found in the register. More than 80% of the spontaneous abortions identified from both sources were recorded in the same year. During follow-up a total of 20.9% of pregnancies intended to be carried to term ended as a spontaneous abortion. In the risk factor analysis, we found that previous spontaneous abortion, being single, never having used oral contraceptives, and use of intrauterine device were associated with increased risk of subsequent spontaneous abortion. In addition, it was indicated that a short interpregnancy interval following a spontaneous abortion may confer an increased risk of abortion in the subsequent pregnancy. CONCLUSION: We found a high rate of spontaneous abortion in the present study and an acceptable agreement between information obtained by interview and register information. More than 25% of the spontaneous abortions were only reported by the women, and this could not be explained by erroneously reported induced abortions, and may be early, nonhospitalized abortions. We confirm that number of previous spontaneous abortions is a strong determinant, and our data may also indicate a role of previous contraceptive habits. A role of the length of interpregnancy interval in the risk of spontaneous abortion cannot be ruled out.     

Contraceptive counselling for women with multiple unintended pregnancies: the abortion client’s perspective

Objectives: Some women have multiple unintended pregnancies. Appropriate interventions could prevent some of the abortions that follow. This article presents the opinions of some abortion clients about their contraception and the counselling they received. It also formulates suggestions for counselling strategies of health care providers (HCPs) and other interventions that can support effective contraceptive behaviour.

Methods: A mixed method approach was used. A quantitative survey was carried out in one clinic in the Netherlands (N?=?201), assessing topics related to contraceptive use and counselling. Semi-structured interviews (n?=?11) were conducted with women who had had at least three unintended pregnancies. Interview topics included the type of contraceptive counselling, experience with contraceptive counselling and preferences regarding access to contraceptive information.

Results: Women who had had multiple abortions were more likely to express a need for contraceptive counselling and more often discussed contraception with their HCP compared with women who had had one abortion. Several themes emerged from the semi-structured interviews that had partially contributed to further unplanned pregnancies: experience with counselling, acceptability of the contraceptive method, sources of information and cultural influences. Many women with multiple unintended pregnancies could not find suitable advice and stated preferences for future decision making.

Conclusion: This study offers insight into the motives for contraceptive use of women with multiple unintended pregnancies. Contraceptive efficacy could be improved by implementing counselling that is adapted to individual needs. The respondents stated that they would appreciate other sources of information, such as support through other forms of communication. The formation of a working group would be helpful in developing these services.     

Unsafe Abortion: Unnecessary Maternal Mortality

Every year, worldwide, about 42 million women with unintended pregnancies choose abortion, and nearly half of these procedures, 20 million, are unsafe. Some 68,000 women die of unsafe abortion annually, making it one of the leading causes of maternal mortality (13%). Of the women who survive unsafe abortion, 5 million will suffer long-term health complications. Unsafe abortion is thus a pressing issue. Both of the primary methods for preventing unsafe abortion—less restrictive abortion laws and greater contraceptive use—face social, religious, and political obstacles, particularly in developing nations, where most unsafe abortions (97%) occur. Even where these obstacles are overcome, women and health care providers need to be educated about contraception and the availability of legal and safe abortion, and women need better access to safe abortion and postabortion services. Otherwise, desperate women, facing the financial burdens and social stigma of unintended pregnancy and believing they have no other option, will continue to risk their lives by undergoing unsafe abortions.Key words: Unsafe abortions, Maternal mortality, Postabortion careAccording to the World Health Organization (WHO), every 8 minutes a woman in a developing nation will die of complications arising from an unsafe abortion. An unsafe abortion is defined as “a procedure for terminating an unintended pregnancy carried out either by persons lacking the necessary skills or in an environment that does not conform to minimal medical standards, or both.”¹ The fifth United Nations Millennium Development Goal recommends a 75% reduction in maternal mortality by 2015. WHO deems unsafe abortion one of the easiest preventable causes of maternal mortality and a staggering public health issue.     

Are Serbian gynaecologists in line with modern family planning?

OBJECTIVES: In Serbia, gynaecologists could play an important role in achieving the transition from an abortion-based family planning culture to a modern contraception-based one. Exploring their knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding birth control is of particular importance for ensuring the quality of contraceptive counselling. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all the 1,139 members of the Gynaecology and Obstetrics Section of the Serbian Medical Society. The response rate was 27%. RESULTS: Of the respondents, 61.8% reported that either they or their partner had had one or more induced abortions; 37.6% stated that they usually used either coitus interruptus or no contraceptive method at all; 51.0% were unwilling to prescribe combined oral contraceptives (COCs) to girls younger than 18 years, and 76.5% advised women against the use of COCs for more than two years. Irrational concerns about the health risks of contraception were identified. The contraceptive needs of women aged 20 + were particularly hampered by the fact that 75.5% of respondents thought that intrauterine device use was unsafe for women with benign, non infectious cervicitis. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that a significant number of Serbian gynaecologists neither use modern methods of contraception themselves nor have adequate knowledge to advise their patients. Thus, education and training of gynaecologists in all methods of available contraception is a priority in Serbia.     

Reasons for pregnancy termination, contraceptive habits and contraceptive failure among Swedish women requesting an early pregnancy termination

BACKGROUND: More than 30 000 legal abortions are performed every year in Sweden despite sexual education in schools, widespread youth-clinics and family planning services that are free of charge. The aim of this study was to investigate reasons for induced abortion, contraceptive habits and reasons for contraceptive failure among women presenting for induced abortion. METHODS: A questionnaire was administered to 591 Swedish-speaking women consecutively attending three different health care providers concerning an induced abortion during spring 2000. RESULTS: The response rate was 88% (n = 518). As many as 43%, among daily smokers 53%, had experienced one or more previous legal abortions. The majority of the women (97%) had discussed the decision about abortion with someone. The most cited reasons contributing to their decision were financial concerns, worries about the relationship and bad timing of the pregnancy. Though 85% had used contraception during the previous year, 36% of the women had not used any contraceptive method at the time of conception. The main reason given for not using contraception was the belief that they could not at that time become pregnant (35%). Ninety percent of the women planned to use contraception after the abortion. CONCLUSION: Women's decisions regarding induced abortion are multifactorial. One important reason was "poor economy". One out of three did not use any contraception, as they believed they could not become pregnant. Women presenting for induced abortion are a risk-group for further terminations. Counseling must include information about the fertile window, effective contraceptives and the emergency contraceptive pill.     

Induced abortion and contraception: survey of 576 young women in Naples

The aim of the study was to investigate the link between induced abortion and contraceptive methods. Five hundred and seventy-six women who underwent induced abortions at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Institute of the Second University of Naples were interviewed. They were asked about their knowledge of contraception methods; age, school attendance rate and marital status were also considered. The women were 27.8 (mean age) years old, high school educated (58.5%), married (41%), nulliparous (63%). Twenty-four percent of the women admitted a previous induced abortion. Withdrawal (176 women), condoms (104) and oral contraceptives (74 women) were the most widely used contraceptive methods. Withdrawal (37%) resulted in being the most utilized method during the cycle in which conception occurred; no method had been employed by 31% of the women. We found that 35% of the women had used their contraceptive method in a regular way but become pregnant nevertheless. Another group of 40% had forgotten to use their contraceptives for a few days and became pregnant by accident. In the last group of 25% of the women had not used any contraceptive methods. The diffusion of modern methods of fertility regulation influences the number of induced abortions as shown by its reduction since 1982. Our data confirm that induced abortion is the consequence of an insufficient use of modern contraceptives. Therefore more information is necessary to get women and men to use contraceptive methods regularly.     

Risk factors and the choice of long-acting reversible contraception following medical abortion: effect on subsequent induced abortion and unwanted pregnancy

Objective: To analyse the post-abortion effect of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) plans and initiation on the risk of subsequent unwanted pregnancy and abortion.

Materials and methods: retrospective cohort study of 666 women who underwent medical abortion between January–May 2013 at Helsinki University Hospital, Finland. Altogether 159 (23.8%) women planning post-abortion use of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) participated in a randomized study and had an opportunity to receive the LNG-IUS free-of-charge from the hospital. The other 507 (76.2%) women planned and obtained their contraception according to clinical routine. Demographics, planned contraception, and LARC initiation at the time of the index abortion were collected. Data on subsequent abortions were retrieved from the Finnish Abortion Register and electronic patient files until the end of 2014.

Results: During the 21 months ([median], IQR 20–22) follow-up, 54(8.1%) women requested subsequent abortions. When adjusted for age, previous pregnancies, deliveries, induced abortions and gestational-age, planning LARC for post-abortion contraception failed to prevent subsequent abortion (33 abortions/360 women, 9.2%) compared to other contraceptive plans (21/306, 6.9%) (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.68–2.17). However, verified LARC initiation decreased the abortion rate (4 abortions/177 women, 2.3%) compared to women with uncertain LARC initiation status (50/489, 10.2%) (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.06–0.48). When adjusted for LARC initiation status, age?<25 years was a risk factor for subsequent abortion (27 abortions/283 women, 9.5%) compared to women?≥25 years (27/383, 7.0%, HR1.95, 95% CI 1.04–3.67).

Conclusions: Initiation of LARC as part of abortion service at the time of medical abortion is an important means to prevent subsequent abortion, especially among young women.     

Contraceptive use, fertility, and unsafe abortion in developing countries.

OBJECTIVES: Despite a substantial rise in contraceptive use around the world, unplanned pregnancies and induced abortion continue to occur. Each year an estimated 19 million abortions are carried out outside the legal system, often by unskilled practitioners or under unhygienic conditions. This paper explores the relationship between contraceptive prevalence and unsafe abortion in developing regions with different levels of fertility. These relationships manifest the extent to which the desire to regulate fertility is addressed by contraception or by unsafe abortion, where access to safe abortion is legally restricted. METHODS: Secondary analysis of estimates of unsafe abortion, total fertility rate and contraceptive prevalence, by geographical regions. RESULTS: High levels of unsafe abortion persist even where contraceptive prevalence is increasing and fertility is declining. It appears that a high dependence on sterilization for limiting family size may by be preceded by reliance on unsafe abortion, where abortion is restricted, for birth spacing. CONCLUSIONS: The reliance on unsafe abortion could be reduced during fertility transition by improving women's access to reversible contraceptives for spacing births as well as to sterilization for terminating childbearing. Expanding contraceptive choices and a balanced method mix can serve as an effective strategy to prevent unsafe abortion where reliance on sterilization to limit childbearing is not preceded by the use of reversible modern methods for spacing and where access to safe abortion is restricted by law. The intriguing association between contraceptive method choice and the incidence of unsafe abortion deserves further exploration.     

Unsafe abortion: worldwide estimates for 2000

Unsafe abortion is preventable and yet remains a significant cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in much of the developing world. Over the last decade, the World Health Organization has developed a systematic approach to estimate the regional and global incidence of unsafe abortion. Estimates based on figures around the year 2000 indicate that 19 million unsafe abortions take place each year, that is, approximately one in ten pregnancies ended in an unsafe abortion, giving a ratio of one unsafe abortion to about seven live births. Almost all unsafe abortions take place in the developing world. In Latin America and the Caribbean, 3.7 million unsafe abortions are estimated to take place each year, with an abortion rate of 26 per 1000 women of reproductive age, almost one unsafe abortion to every three live births. Asia has the lowest unsafe abortion rate at 11 per 1000 women of reproductive age, but 10.5 million unsafe abortions take place there each year, almost one unsafe abortion to every seven live births. However, excluding East Asia, where most abortions are safe and accessible, the ratio for the rest of Asia is one unsafe abortion to five live births. In Africa, 4.2 million abortions are estimated to take place per year, with an unsafe abortion rate of 22 per 1000 women, or one unsafe abortion per seven live births. In contrast, there is one unsafe abortion per 25 live births in developed countries.     

Risk factors for repeat abortion in Nepal

ObjectiveTo examine the incidence of and risk factors for repeat abortion in Nepal.MethodsData were analyzed from a survey of 1172 women who had surgical abortions between December 2009 and March 2010 in 2 clinics in Kathmandu, Nepal. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to estimate odds ratios for the risk factors.ResultsAmong the respondents, 32.3% (95% confidence interval, 29.6–34.9) had repeat abortions. This incidence rose sharply with age and parity, and was higher among those with no intention of having a future child, those attaining primary or secondary level education, and those attending the non-governmental sector clinic. Women with repeat abortion were similar to those with 1 abortion in terms of contraceptive practice. Among women not using contraceptives at the time of the unintended pregnancy, the 3 most commonly cited reasons were ill health, non-compliance with the method intended for use, and dislike of the method. Women with repeat abortion showed a pattern of contraceptive acceptance immediately after the procedure similar to that of women who had 1 abortion.ConclusionRepeat abortion is emerging as a major public health issue in Nepal, with implications for counseling and provision of abortion, and for family planning services.     

Changing attitudes towards abortion in Europe.

OBJECTIVE: To understand how personal and social attitudes are changing regarding more available safe abortion in Europe. RESULTS: Abortion has been commonly practiced for a long time throughout most of the world, either in legal or illegal conditions, but it is a subject that arouses passion and controversy, because abortion raises two important issues, namely sex and life, sometimes mixed with religion and ethics. Over the past few years, we have observed changes in laws, and personal and professional attitudes towards abortion. Social needs modify the attitudes of the authorities and individuals. In many countries where the performance of abortion is illegal, statistics indicate that large numbers of abortions are carried out, but authorities are indifferent, ignore or tolerate it or even unofficially license clinics for the abortion. In some other countries where abortion is technically legal, access to authorized facilities and personnel may be limited, or resources to pay for the abortion may be lacking, resulting in more illegal abortions. There are, therefore, two categories of abortion: legal versus illegal, and safe versus unsafe. However, laws are changing, becoming even more liberal, even if, in certain nations, there are renewed attempts to question the right of women to decide. Practice is changing and in some cases becoming separate from the law. Basic ideas are changing, because, in a large number of European countries, we are moving from a culture of abortion to a culture of contraception and prevention of abortion, through an effort of governments, women, professionals, and non-governmental organizations. Certainly, important steps have been taken in the different ways of performing an abortion. For example, we have seen the arrival of medical abortion, with the use of mifepristone and misoprostol. Finally, there is also a change in the way of supporting women through humane and complete counseling, which includes attention to follow-up services offering a choice of contraceptive methods to help women avoid another unwanted pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: There is some resistance at different levels, but attitudes are changing in a positive way throughout Europe, offering a good quality of service, good facilities, well-trained practitioners and more open minds.     

Postabortion contraception a decade after legalization of abortion in Nepal

Objective

To assess the contraceptive information received and methods chosen, received, and used among women having abortions one decade after legalization of abortion in Nepal.

Methods

We examined postabortion contraception with questionnaires at baseline and six months among women obtaining legal abortions (n = 838) at four facilities in 2011. Multivariate regression analysis was used to measure factors associated with method information, choice, receipt, and use.

Results

One-third of participants received no information on effective methods, and 56% left facilities without a method. The majority of women who chose to use injectables and pills were able to do so (88% and 75%, respectively). However, only 44% of women choosing long-acting reversible contraceptives and 5% choosing sterilization had initiated use of the method by six months. Levels of contraceptive use after medical abortion were on par with those after aspiration abortion. Nulliparous women were far less likely than parous women to receive information and use methods. Women living without husbands or partners were also less likely to receive information and supplies, or to use methods.

Conclusion

Improvements in postabortion counseling and provision are needed. Ensuring that women choosing long-acting and permanent contraceptive methods are able to obtain either them or interim methods is essential.