Motor features and response to oral levodopa in patients with Parkinson’s disease under continuous dopaminergic infusion or deep brain stimulation

Background: Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) and continuous dopaminergic infusions (jejunal levodopa or subcutaneous apomorphine) are indicated in complicated Parkinson’s disease (PD), although it remains unsettled how they compare to each other. Methods: We investigated the daytime motor condition in patients with advanced PD under monotherapy with jejunal levodopa, subcutaneous apomorphine, or STN DBS and also measured the motor changes produced by an additional standard morning dose of levodopa. Motor performance was assessed with the UPDRS‐III, hand taps, the AIMS dyskinesia score and patients’ diaries. Outcome measures were time to best motor ‘on’ after start of morning treatment, daytime variability of motor condition, motor scores. Results: The time to ‘on’ was longest in the jejunal levodopa group. DBS and jejunal levodopa treatments produced stable motor conditions without appreciable ‘off’ episodes. Continuous apomorphine infusion was associated with the worst motor scores (UPDRS‐III and taps) and the most frequent off‐states. Jejunal levodopa infusion was associated with the highest AIMS scores. Addition of a levodopa dose produced shortening of time to ‘on’ and a transient motor improvement in the jejunal levodopa group without increase in dyskinesias; in the DBS and apomorphine groups, there was an increase in dyskinesias without changes in UPDRS‐III or taps. Conclusions: STN DBS provided adequate trade‐off between motor improvement and dyskinesia control, although dyskinesias could be elicited by adding oral levodopa. Jejunal levodopa infusion produced adequate motor improvement with slow time to ‘on’ and moderate dyskinesias. Apomorphine infusion produced insufficient motor control and negligible dyskinesias.     

Effects of gabapentin on the motor response to levodopa: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in patients with complicated Parkinson disease

BACKGROUND: Motor fluctuations and dyskinesias affect many parkinsonian patients chronically treated with levodopa. Imbalance between gabaergic direct and indirect striatopallidal pathways may originate them. Manipulating GABA neurotransmission may be effective in the treatment of these patients. Gabapentin is an antiepileptic drug that increases the synthesis and release of GABA. Previous studies suggest that gabapentin may be useful in Parkinson disease (PD). OBJECTIVE: To know the effects of gabapentin on the motor response to levodopa in PD patients with motor complications. DESIGN: A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial with four weeks of treatment. SETTING: A tertiary referral center. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty subjects with PD and motor fluctuations and dyskinesias on stable antiparkinsonian treatment, took gabapentin up to a maximum dose of 2.400 mg/d in three doses and placebo. METHODS: Three levodopa challenges were performed: at the beginning of the study and at the end of each period of treatment (4 weeks). Basal (off) and best (on) motor status were assessed by the UPDRS III. Latency to peak effect, magnitude of motor response (difference between "on" and "off" scores in the UPDRS III), duration of motor response and severity and duration of dyskinesias after each levodopa challenge were assessed. Patients' diaries were administered. RESULTS:: Fifteen patients completed the study. A significant improvement in the basal UPDRS III resulting in a significant reduction in the magnitude of the motor response after gabapentin was obtained (P < 0.001). No other changes were observed, either on pharmacological parameters or in levodopa-induced dyskinesias. Number of daily hours spent in "on," "on with dyskinesias" and "off" also remained unchanged. Tolerance was good, dizziness being the most common side effect. CONCLUSION: Gabapentin improved parkinsonian symptoms (basal UPDRS III and magnitude of the motor response) following levodopa. This improvement was not reflected in the daily motor situation of patients. Dyskinesias remained unchanged. Gabapentin was well tolerated. Further studies are needed to know the impact of these results in the long-term.     

Weight gain following unilateral pallidotomy in Parkinson's disease

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical correlates and infer pathogenesis of weight gain following pallidotomy in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). BACKGROUND: Surgical ablation of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) improves levodopa induced dyskinesias, moderately improves most other "cardinal" manifestations of PD, and has been noted to result in increased weight. METHODS: We incorporated Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scales (UPDRS) subscales, the Beck depression inventory and feeding questionnaire data into a linear regression model in order to determine which post-surgical change(s) may lead to weight gain over the first year following pallidotomy, n = 60. RESULTS: The mean weight gain 1 year after pallidotomy was 4.0 +/- 4.1 kg. Improvement in "off" motor scores (P < 0.005), especially gait subscores (P<0.0001), and to a lesser extent improvement in "on" motor scores (P<0.05) predicted weight gain. Changes in dyskinesia ratings, mood, food intake, dysphagia, levodopa dose, weight loss in the year prior to pallidotomy, age, and duration of PD did not correlate with subsequent weight gain. CONCLUSION: The high correlation between post-pallidotomy weight gain and "off" motor scores, suggests that this phenomenon is related to some change in underlying homeostasis associated with changes in the cardinal manifestations of PD itself, rather than secondary changes resultant from the surgery.     

Long-term comparative experience with tolcapone and entacapone in advanced Parkinson's disease

The objective of this study was to compare the long-term tolerability and efficacy of tolcapone and entacapone in patients with fluctuating Parkinson's disease (PD). Tolcapone and entacapone are two currently available catechol- O -methyltransferase inhibitors that have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of advanced PD. There are little published data on long-term experience and no direct comparisons. We compared the results of two separate, simultaneous, long-term open label extensions, one for tolcapone and the other for entacapone. The inclusion/exclusion criteria were similar. Data were collected prospectively at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. Efficacy measures included the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) total score, subscores, items 32 (duration of dyskinesia) and 39 (duration of "off" time), and levodopa dose. The two groups were compared using a Mann-Whitney U test for change from baseline and analysis of variance. Tolerability was defined as the ability of patients to maintain therapy and was compared using a Kaplan-Meier analysis. Eleven patients enrolled in the entacapone study and 14 in the tolcapone study. The tolcapone group had more severe disease with significantly higher UPDRS motor score, duration of "off," and levodopa dose requirement. Tolcapone was more effective in lowering UPDRS motor and complication subscores, duration of "off" time, and levodopa doses. UPDRS motor scores and change in levodopa dose in the tolcapone group remained below baseline level for 36 months; however, they were above baseline in the entacapone group from 6 months on. Tolerability was the same for both treatments. Tolcapone appears to have greater and longer efficacy with regard to motor symptoms, "off" time, and change in levodopa requirements than entacapone. These findings indicate that tolcapone continues to have a place in the treatment of advanced PD. However, the risks associated with this drug, particularly hepatic injury, and the requirement for rigorous blood monitoring, need to be considered when choosing an appropriate treatment for patients with advanced PD.     

Entacapone in the treatment of Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND: The development of fluctuations in motor response and involuntary movements commonly complicate the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors delay the breakdown of levodopa, which leads to an increase in levodopa bioavailability and more stable concentrations of plasma levodopa. The addition of a COMT inhibitor therefore combines the rapid onset of levodopa with prolonged efficacy, and theoretically provides a more continuous stimulation of dopamine receptors with reduced risk of motor complications. Randomised, controlled trials have shown that in patients with PD who have motor fluctuations, the addition of the COMT-inhibitor entacapone results in an improvement in motor fluctuations, particularly of the "wearing-off" type, with about 1.0-1.7 h more on-time and less off-time per day, reduced required levodopa dose, modest improvement in motor and disability scores (mean total unified PD rating scale [UPDRS] scores of about 4.5), and in some but not all studies improvement of health-related quality of life [HRQOL] scores. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: Patients with stable PD, without motor fluctuations, also have improved HRQOL scores on treatment with entacapone in addition to levodopa with a dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor. However, in a recent large multicentre study, UPDRS motor and disability scores were not improved despite significant improvements in HRQOL scores. The disparity between results on clinical rating scales and HRQOL scores suggests that these scales give different and potentially complementary information on health status changes in PD, and that entacapone provides benefit that may not be captured with standard clinical rating scales. Whether entacapone combined with levodopa can delay dyskinesia or motor fluctuations in patients with untreated PD is unknown; however, in animal studies, a decrease in motor complications has been reported in drug-naive animals given frequent doses of levodopa combined with entacapone. WHERE NEXT?: Clinical studies are underway to address the hypothesis that motor complications in PD can be delayed if entacapone is given from the start of treatment. Until the results of these trials are available, entacapone is indicated as a useful adjunct to levodopa in the symptomatic treatment of patients with PD with and without motor fluctuations. In addition, future trials should specifically assess the effect of entacapone on HRQOL in PD.     

Different cerebral cortical areas influence the effect of subthalamic nucleus stimulation on parkinsonian motor deficits and freezing of gait.

Inconsistent response in freezing of gait (FOG) with levodopa treatment or STN DBS makes the pathogenesis difficult to understand. We studied brain areas associated with the expression of STN DBS effect on parkinsonian motor deficits and FOG. Ten Parkinson's disease patients with typical FOG were included. One month before STN DBS, we performed [(18)F]-deoxyglucose PET scans and measured the UPDRS motor and modified FOG (mFOG) scores during levodopa off and on periods. At two months after STN DBS, same rating scores were measured. The percentage improvement of mFOG and UPDRS motor scores by STN DBS during levodopa off period was calculated. We searched for brain areas in which glucose metabolism correlated with the improvement of mFOG and UPDRS motor scores by DBS. During levodopa off period, STN DBS improved the UPDRS motor scores by 32.3% and the mFOG scores by 56.6%. There was no correlation between the improvements of both scores. The improvement of UPDRS motor score by DBS correlated with the metabolic activities of rostral supplementary motor area (Brodmann's area 8; BA8), anterior cingulate cortex (BA32), and prefrontal cortex (BA9). On the other hand, there was a positive correlation between the improvement of mFOG score by DBS and the metabolic activity of the parietal, occipital, and temporal sensory association cortices. In conclusion, dysfunction of different cerebral cortical areas limits the beneficial effects of DBS on parkinsonian motor deficits and FOG.     

Gait dynamics in Parkinson's disease: relationship to Parkinsonian features,falls and response to levodopa

OBJECTIVES: Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) have an increased risk of falling that has yet to be fully explained. To better understand the gait disturbance in PD and the factors that contribute to falls, we quantitatively evaluated: (1) the relationship between gait variability (a marker of fall risk in other populations), fall history, and other parkinsonian features, and (2) the effects of levodopa on these relationships. METHODS: The average stride time and stride-to-stride variability were measured using force-sensitive insoles during comfortable walking. Fall frequency, motor control, function, and mental health were measured using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE), and the timed motor tests of the Core Assessment Program for Intracerebral Transplantations (CAPIT) in 32 subjects with idiopathic PD, in an "off" (unmedicated) state and again in an "on" (medicated) state. RESULTS: Average stride time was not associated with any UPDRS or CAPIT measure and was similar in fallers and non-fallers in "off" and "on" states (p>0.27). Stride time variability was significantly associated with fall frequency as well as with total scores on the CAPIT and the UPDRS, ADL abilities, and motor function. Stride time variability and falls were not related to tremor, rigidity or bradykinesia in the "off" state. 41% of subjects reported one or more falls. Stride time variability was 8.8+/-7.9% in fallers and 4.2+/-1.3% in non-fallers (p<0.009). Stride time variability significantly improved in response to levodopa, both in fallers and non-fallers, but remained increased in fallers (vs. non-fallers). CONCLUSIONS: The patho-physiology responsible for impaired stride-to-stride regulation of gait timing is apparently independent of other cardinal features of PD, i.e., tremor, rigidity, or bradykinesia, but is responsive to levodopa. Stride-to-stride variability is especially impaired among PD subjects with a history of falls, suggesting, for the first time, the possibility of exaggerated impairment of internal clock function in PD fallers.     

Ten-year follow-up of Parkinson's disease patients randomized to initial therapy with ropinirole or levodopa.

In a 5-year, double-blind study, subjects with Parkinson's disease (PD) who were randomized to initial treatment with ropinirole had a significantly lower incidence of dyskinesia compared with subjects randomized to levodopa, although Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor scores were significantly more improved in the levodopa group. Subjects who completed the original study were eligible to participate in a long-term extension study conducted according to an open, naturalistic design and were evaluated approximately every 6 months until they had been followed for a total of 10 years. Comparing subjects randomized to initial treatment with ropinirole (n = 42) and levodopa (n = 27), the incidence of dyskinesia was significantly lower in the ropinirole group (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.1, 1.0; P = 0.046) and the median time to dyskinesia was significantly longer (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.4; 95% CI: 0.2, 0.8; P = 0.007). The incidence of at least moderate wearing off ("off" time >/=26% of the awake day) was also significantly lower in the ropinirole group (adjusted OR = 0.3; 95% CI: 0.09, 0.03; P = 0.03). There were no significant differences in change in UPDRS activities of daily living or motor scores, or scores for the 39-item PD questionnaire, Clinical Global Impression, or the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Early treatment decisions for individual patients depend largely on the anticipated risk of side effects and long-term complications. Both ropinirole and levodopa are viable treatment options in early PD.     

Effect of bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation on balance and finger control in Parkinson's disease

We aimed to quantify the effects of bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation in Parkinson's disease (PD) on stance and gait ("axial"motor control), and related this to effects on finger movements ("appendicular" motor control). Fourteen PD patients and 20 matched controls participated. Subjects completed several balance and gait tasks (standing with eyes open or closed, on a normal or foam surface; retropulsion test; walking with eyes closed; walking up and down stairs; Get Up and Go test). Postural control was quantified using trunk sway measurements (angle and angular velocity) in the roll and pitch directions. Subjects further performed a pinch grip reaction time task, where we measured isometric grip forces, as well as movement and reaction times. Patients were examined with STN stimulators switched on or off (order randomised across patients), always after a supramaximal levodopa dosage. STN stimulation improved postural control, as reflected by a reduced trunk sway tremor during stance, a reduced duration for all gait tasks, an increased trunk pitch velocity while rising from a chair, and improved roll stability. STN stimulation also improved finger control, as reflected by a reduced time to reach maximum grip force, without altering reaction times and maximum force levels. Improvements in finger control timing did not correlate with reduced task durations during gait. We conclude that STN stimulation affords improvement of postural control in PD, over and above optimal drug treatment. STN stimulation also provides a simultaneous effect on distal and axial motor control. Because improvements in distal and axial motor control were not correlated, we assume that these effects are mediated by stimulation of different structures within the STN.     

Clinical effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation versus acute levodopa challenge in Parkinson's disease

We studied the short-term clinical effects of 10-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the motor hand area contralateral to the more affected limb in 12 non-fluctuating, for at least 12 hours drug free patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). We investigated the efficacy of rTMS in combination with a levodopa challenge test design under double-blind, placebo controlled conditions. Significant reductions of UPDRS III motor scores showed the treatment conditions: placebo/rTMS, levodopa/sham stimulation and levodopa/rTMS. A more detailed evaluation of arm symptoms contralateral to the stimulated brain region showed even more pronounced effects for the three conditions. There were significant differences between the mean response of the UPDRS III arm scores to the four test conditions. In conclusion our study demonstrates short-term beneficial effects of 10-Hz rTMS on motor symptoms in PD patients. A release of endogenous dopamine in subcortical structures, i.e. putamen, in response to rTMS is the most likely mechanism of action.     

Reaction time and movement time after embryonic cell implantation in Parkinson disease

BACKGROUND: Embryonic nigral cell implants are a novel treatment for Parkinson disease (PD). Reaction time (RT) and movement time (MT) analysis, validated quantitative measures of premovement neural processing and motor execution, can be used as objective physiological markers of motor performance in PD. OBJECTIVES: To gauge the change in motor performance in patients with PD who received implants, and to determine whether the physiological findings correlate with clinical outcome measures after transplantation. DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Patients Forty patients with levodopa-responsive, Hoehn and Yahr stage III or greater PD. INTERVENTIONS: Random assignment to embryonic tissue implants or placebo (sham) operation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Combined RT + MT scores measured preoperatively and at 4 and 12 months postoperatively in the "off" state. RESULTS: The difference in mean RT + MT scores between the sham and implant groups was statistically significant (P =.005) and was greatest in those 60 years or older (P =.003). Changes correlated with Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale off scores at 4 (r = 0.87, P =.001) and 12 (r = 0.75, P =.01) months in those younger than 60 years. There was a significant deterioration in the sham surgery group at 12 months (P =.03) that was thought to be due to worsening in subjects 60 years and older (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: The physiological measures detected significant changes in patients undergoing embryonic nigral cell implants and correlated directly with clinical outcome measures. Comprehensive analyses of RT paradigms can document subtle changes in motor performance over time, making them useful outcome measures in therapeutic trials of PD. These findings support further research into nigral cell implantation for PD.     

Levodopa withdrawal after bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation in advanced Parkinson disease

CONTEXT: Subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation may be effective in ameliorating parkinsonian symptoms even to the extent to permit levodopa withdrawal. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the efficacy of STN stimulation in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) and to determine if levodopa may be withdrawn after surgery. DESIGN: Before-after trial. SETTING: Referral center, hospitalized care. PATIENTS: Fifteen patients with advanced PD. INTERVENTIONS: Microelectrode-guided bilateral STN high-frequency stimulation. OUTCOME MEASURES: Before surgery patients were evaluated in off-medication and on-medication conditions. Dopaminergic drug dosages were reduced after surgery, aiming for complete withdrawal. Six months after surgery, patients were reeavaluated in off- and on-medication conditions, with the stimulation turned on and off. RESULTS: Total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score in the off-medication condition improved by 65.9%; and axial symptoms, bradykinesia, rigidity, and tremor improved by 65.8%, 60.4%, 66.1%, and 81.1%, respectively. UPDRS part II scores were reduced by 71.8% and Schwab and England scores improved by 45.3%. Levodopa was withdrawn in 8 patients and the overall levodopa dose was reduced 80.4%. "Off" time was reduced 89.7% and the severity of dyskinesias decreased 80.6% after surgery. All results reached significance (P<.001). Stimulation of the STN achieved antiparkinsonian effect similar to that of treatment with levodopa. No life-threatening adverse effects occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral STN stimulation safely improves all parkinsonian symptoms, decreases or eliminates the need for levodopa, and ameliorates motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. Complete withdrawal of levodopa is feasible with this technique and the overall motor effect of STN stimulation is quantitatively comparable to that obtained with levodopa.     

Metabolic correlates of levodopa response in Parkinson's disease.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of levodopa on resting-state brain metabolism in PD. BACKGROUND: In previous studies the authors used [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and PET to quantify regional metabolic abnormalities in PD. They found that this disease is characterized reproducibly by a specific abnormal PD-related pattern (PDRP). In this study the authors used IV levodopa infusion to quantify the effects of dopamine replacement on regional metabolism and PDRP network activity. They tested the hypothesis that clinical response to dopaminergic therapy correlates with these metabolic changes. METHODS: The authors used FDG/PET to measure resting-state regional brain metabolism in seven patients with PD (age, 59.4 +/- 4.2 years; Hoehn and Yahr stage, 1.9 +/- 0.7, mean +/- SD); subjects were scanned both off levodopa and during an individually titrated constant-rate IV levodopa infusion. The authors used statistical parametric mapping to identify significant changes in regional brain metabolism that occurred with this intervention. They also quantified levodopa-induced changes in PDRP expression. Metabolic changes with levodopa correlated with clinical improvement as measured by changes in Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor scores. RESULTS: Levodopa infusion improved UPDRS motor ratings (30.6% +/- 12.0%, p < 0.002) and significantly decreased regional glucose metabolism in the left putamen, right thalamus, bilateral cerebellum, and left primary motor cortex (p < 0.001). Changes in pallidal metabolism correlated significantly with clinical improvement in UPDRS motor ratings (p < 0.01). Levodopa infusion also resulted in a significant (p = 0.01) decline in PDRP expression. The changes in PDRP activity mediated by levodopa correlated significantly with clinical improvement in UPDRS motor ratings (r = -0.78, p < 0.04). CONCLUSION: Levodopa reduces brain metabolism in the putamen, thalamus, and cerebellum in patients with PD. Additionally, levodopa reduces PD-related pattern activity, and the degree of network suppression correlates with clinical improvement. The response to dopaminergic therapy in Patients with PD may be determined by the modulation of cortico-striato-pallido-thalamocortical pathways.     

Stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease: a 5 year follow up

BACKGROUND: The short term benefits of bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in patients with advanced levodopa responsive Parkinson's disease (PD) are well documented, but long term benefits are still uncertain. OBJECTIVES: This study provides a 5 year follow up of PD patients treated with stimulation of the STN. METHODS: Thirty seven consecutive patients with PD treated with bilateral STN stimulation were assessed prospectively 6, 24, and 60 months after neurosurgery. Parkinsonian motor disability was evaluated with and without levodopa treatment, with and without bilateral STN stimulation. Neuropsychological and mood assessments included the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale, the frontal score, and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). RESULTS: No severe peri- or immediate postoperative side effects were observed. Six patients died and one was lost to follow up. Five years after neurosurgery: (i) activity of daily living (Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) II) was improved by stimulation of the STN by 40% ("off" drug) and 60% ("on" drug); (ii) parkinsonian motor disability (UPDRS III) was improved by 54% ("off" drug) and 73% ("on" drug); (iii) the severity of levodopa related motor complications was decreased by 67% and the levodopa daily doses were reduced by 58%. The MADRS was unchanged, but cognitive performance declined significantly. Persisting adverse effects included eyelid opening apraxia, weight gain, addiction to levodopa treatment, hypomania and disinhibition, depression, dysarthria, dyskinesias, and apathy. CONCLUSIONS: Despite moderate motor and cognitive decline, probably due to disease progression, the marked improvement in motor function observed postoperatively was sustained 5 years after neurosurgery.     

Differential progression of motor impairment in levodopa-treated Parkinson's disease.

OBJECTIVE: To monitor comparative progression of clinical impairment over 4 years in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) who present on levodopa at two different levels of Hoehn and Yahr (HY) stages, II and III. BACKGROUND: The rate of clinical impairment progression in patients with PD being treated with levodopa has not been studied in detail using current, standardized assessment tools. Sample size estimates for all levodopa adjunctive treatment studies and proper definition of study groups require a solid estimate of longitudinal motor impairment progression. DESIGN/METHODS: From our computer database, we identified two groups of patients with PD being treated with levodopa based on their initial HY stage at presentation to our center (II or III). Fifty randomly selected subjects in each stage were monitored in the ON state with annual Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor scores, dyskinesia ratings, and antiparkinsonian medication doses using a repeated measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: The stage II and stage III subjects had similar disease duration. In stage II subjects, parkinsonian impairment was maintained without progression over 4 years, but in association with significantly higher dyskinesia scores and dopaminergic medication doses. In stage III subjects, UPDRS motor scores deteriorated despite more medication and increased dyskinesias. Of the established six factors comprising the UPDRS motor scale, bradykinesia accounted for the increased impairment. Initial UPDRS motor score and disease duration did not influence progression of motor impairment. CONCLUSION: In subjects with similar disease duration, progression of PD motor impairment differs significantly between stage II and stage III subjects over 4 years. Whereas in stage II subjects, parkinsonian impairment can be stabilized at the expense of increased dyskinesia and dopaminergic drugs, once subjects reach stage III, motor impairment progresses. Power estimates and sample size calculations for these groups of patients should be calculated separately.     

P型和C型多系统萎缩的急性多巴反应性研究

目的研究P型和C型多系统萎缩（MSA）对左旋多巴的急性反应性。方法对P型MSA患者18例、C型MSA患者13例和帕金森病（PD）患者23例行急性阶梯式左旋多巴试验，药物剂量依次为左旋多巴／苄丝肼50mg／12．5mg、100mg／25mg、150mg／37．5mg、200mg／50mg和300mg／75mg。以UPDRS运动分量表作为评价标准，计算UPDRS运动评分平均最大改善率并比较各组患者的多巴反应性。结果左旋多巴／苄丝肼剂量为。100mg／25mg、150．mg／37．5mg、200mg／50mg和300mg／75mg时，MSA-P型组和MSA—C型组韵UPDRS运动评分平均最大改善率均显著低于PD组，MSA-P型组高于MSA-C型组。MSA-P型组患者随服用左旋多巴／苄丝肼剂量增加UPDRS评分平均最大改善率呈逐渐增高趋势，而MSA-C型不同剂量间UPDRS评分平均最大改善率差异无统计学意义。结论MSA-P型组具有剂量依赖的急性多巴反应性，而MSA-C型组基本无急性多巴反应性。     

Quality of life in early Parkinson's disease treated with levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone

We aimed to investigate whether treatment with levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone when compared with levodopa/carbidopa improves quality of life in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with no or minimal, nondisabling motor fluctuations. This is a multicenter, randomized, double‐blind study. One hundred eighty‐four patients on 3 to 4 equal doses of 100/25 to 200/50 mg levodopa/carbidopa or levodopa/benserazide, 0 to 3 hours of nondisabling OFF time over a 48 hour period and no dyskinesia were randomized to levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone or levodopa/carbidopa treatment for 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure was quality of life as assessed by the PDQ‐8. Secondary outcome measures were the UPDRS parts I–IV, and the Wearing Off Card. Treatment with levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone resulted in significantly greater improvements in PDQ‐8 scores compared to treatment with levodopa/carbidopa (mean difference 1.4 points, P = 0.021). Statistically significant improvements were seen predominantly in nonmotor domains (depression, personal relationships, communication, stigma, all P < 0.05; dressing P = 0.056). Patients who were randomly assigned to levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone also showed significantly greater improvement in UPDRS part II scores (P = 0.032) with UPDRS part III scores showing borderline significance. Differences in UPDRS parts I and IV and Wearing Off Card scores were not significant. Treatment with levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone results in improved quality of life compared with levodopa/carbidopa in PD patients with mild or minimal, nondisabling motor fluctuations. © 2007 Movement Disorder Society     

Bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation in the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease. Five years' personal experience

Background and purposeThe objective of the study was to assess bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) for patients with advanced Parkinson disease (PD).Material and methodsThe study population included 5 patients with bilateral STN DBS who completed a 5-year postoperative follow-up period. In all patients electrodes (Model 3387 or 3389) were stereotactically bilaterally inserted into the STN using a Leksell stereotactic G frame. The clinical rating tests included Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and two motor-timed tests derived from CAPIT (rapid movements between two points and stand-walk-sit test). All patients were assessed in off and on condition before implantation and 1, 3 and 5 years in medication on and off condition and stimulation on condition and stimulation off condition. To compare preoperative to postoperative UPDRS scores, only mean values and standard deviations are presented because of the small study population.ResultsThe stimulation effect was noted in the off state, resulting in a 59% improvement in motor scores of UPDRS at 5-year follow-up, when compared to preoperative scores. In the on state the stimulation improved motor scores by 17%. At 5-year follow-up, reduction of daily levodopa dose was 50%.ConclusionsBilateral STN DBS is an effective and safe treatment for patients with advanced PD. Bilateral STN DBS contributes to improvement of parkinsonian symptoms in the off state and levodopa-induced dyskinesia. This can be correlated with a 50% reduction of daily levodopa dose 5 years postoperatively.     

Determination of minimal clinically important change in early and advanced Parkinson's disease

Two common primary efficacy outcome measures in Parkinson's disease (PD) are change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores in early PD and change in “off” time in patients with motor fluctuations. Defining the minimal clinically important change (MCIC) in these outcome measures is important to interpret the clinical relevance of changes observed in clinical trials and other situations. We analyzed data from 2 multicenter, placebo‐controlled, randomized clinical trials of rasagiline; TEMPO studied 404 early PD subjects, and PRESTO studied 472 levodopa‐treated subjects with motor fluctuations. An anchor‐based approach using clinical global impression of improvement (CGI‐I) was used to determine MCIC for UPDRS scores and daily “off” time. MCIC was defined as mean change in actively treated subjects rated minimally improved on CGI‐I. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves defined optimal cutoffs discriminating between changed and unchanged subjects. MCIC for improvement in total UPDRS score (parts I–III) in early PD was determined to be ?3.5 points based on mean scores and ?3.0 points based on ROC curves. In addition, we found an MCIC for reduction in “off” time of 1.0 hours as defined by mean reduction in “off” time in active treated subjects self‐rated as minimally improved on CGI‐I minus mean reduction in “off” time in placebo‐treated subjects self‐rated as unchanged (1.9–0.9 hours). We hypothesize that many methodological factors can influence determination of the MCIC, and a range of values is likely to emerge from multiple studies. © 2011 Movement Disorder Society     

Effects of levodopa infusion on motor activation responses in Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND: Clinical improvement with levodopa therapy for PD is associated with specific regional changes in cerebral glucose metabolism. However, it is unknown how these effects of treatment in the resting state relate to alterations in brain function that occur during movement. In this study, the authors used PET to assess the effects of levodopa on motor activation responses and determined how these changes related to on-line recordings of movement speed and accuracy. METHODS: Seven right-handed PD patients were scanned with H(2)15O/PET while performing a predictable paced sequence of reaching movements and while observing the same screen displays and tones. PET studies were performed during "on" and "off" states with an individually titrated constant rate levodopa infusion; movements were kinematically controlled across treatment conditions. RESULTS: Levodopa improved "off" state UPDRS motor ratings (34%; p < 0.006) and movement time (18%; p = 0.001). Spatial errors worsened during levodopa infusion (24%; p = 0.02). Concurrent regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) recordings revealed significant enhancement of motor activation responses in the posterior putamen bilaterally (p < 0.001), left ventral thalamus (p < 0.002), and pons (p < 0.005). Movement time improvement with treatment correlated with rCBF increases in the left globus pallidus and left ventral thalamus (p < 0.01). By contrast, the increase in spatial errors correlated with rCBF increases in the cerebellar vermis (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that levodopa infusion may improve aspects of motor performance while worsening others. Different components of the motor cortico-striato-pallido-thalamo-cortical loop and related pathways may underlie motor improvement and adverse motoric effects of levodopa therapy for PD.