胰岛素泵治疗儿童1型糖尿病疗效观察

目的 观察胰岛素泵持续皮下输注短效胰岛素(CSII)对儿童1型糖尿病(T1DM)的治疗效果。方法 ①胰岛素泵持续皮下输注CSII治疗6例传统胰岛素治疗(CIT)血糖控制不满意的TDM患儿。并比较其用泵前后空腹血糖(FBG)、餐后2小时血糖(2hPBG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbAk)、胰岛素(INS)用量、胆固醇(CH)及甘油三酯(FG)的变化；②治疗组用泵后上述代谢指标与33例正常对照组比较。结果 ①治疗组用泵后FBG、2hPBG、HbAk、INS用量、TG均较用泵前显著降低；用泵后INS用量减少16％；用泵后患儿依从性增高。②治疗组用泵后FBG、CH及TG均较正常对照组无差异，2hPBG、HbAk仍显著高于正常对照，但均达到强化治疗目的。结论 ①CSII治疗儿童TDM可显著改善其代谢指标，使血糖和血脂降至正常和接近正常。②CSII治疗儿童通过改善HbAk及血脂TDM，可延缓其慢性并发症的发生。     

Effect of carbohydrate counting using bolus calculators on glycemic control in type 1 diabetes patients during continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion

The present study examined the long‐term efficacy of insulin pump therapy for type 1 diabetes patients when carried out using carbohydrate counting with bolus calculators for 1 year. A total of 22 type 1 diabetes patients who had just started continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion were examined and divided into two groups: one that was educated about carbohydrate counting using bolus calculators (n = 14); and another that did not use bolus calculators (n = 8). After 1 year, the hemoglobin A1c levels of the patient group that used bolus calculators decreased persistently and significantly (P = 0.0297), whereas those of the other group did not. The bodyweight, total daily dose of insulin and bolus percentage of both groups did not change. Carbohydrate counting using bolus calculators is necessary to achieve optimal and persistent glycemic control in patients undergoing continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.     

Diurnal variation of carbohydrate insulin ratio in adult type 1 diabetic patients treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion

To estimate the carbohydrate‐to‐insulin ratio (CIR), a formula dividing a constant, usually 300–500, by the total daily dose (TDD) of insulin, is widely utilized. An appropriate CIR varies for each meal of the day, however. Here, we investigate diurnal variation of CIR in hospitalized Japanese type 1 diabetic patients treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. After optimization of the insulin dose, TDD and total basal insulin dose (TBD) were 34.9 ± 10.2 and 9.3 ± 2.8 units, respectively, with a percentage of TBD to TDD of 27.3 ± 6.0%. The products of CIR and TDD at breakfast, lunch and dinner were 311 ± 63, 530 ± 161, and 396 ± 63, respectively, suggesting that in the formula estimating CIR using TDD, the constant should vary for each meal of the day, and that 300, 500, and 400 are appropriate for breakfast, lunch, and dinner, respectively.     

初诊与非初诊2型糖尿病患者胰岛素泵的应用

目的探讨短期持续皮下胰岛素输注（CSⅡ）对明显高血糖的初诊和非初诊2型糖尿病（T2DM）患者的应用方法。方法T2DM患者1276例,其中初诊组479例,非初诊组797例,观察两组血糖达标时间、胰岛素用量、低血糖的发生率及其相关因素。结果CSⅡ治疗使初诊和非初诊糖尿病患者血糖达标时间分别为4．76±2．56天和5．87±2．69天,初诊组达标较快（P〈0．05）,两组胰岛素用量相似,平均每天0．69±0．31U／kg,基础用量占全天用量的61％,但初诊组达标后胰岛素减量较早,降幅较大（P〈0．05）;两组低血糖的发生率相差不多（P〉0．05）。结论CSII治疗于高糖急性期的初诊和非初诊患者都能迅速减轻胰岛素抵抗,改善B细胞功能。     

Optimization of basal insulin delivery in Type 1 diabetes: a retrospective study on the use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and insulin glargine.

AIMS: To compare the effects on glycaemic control after using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) or insulin glargine. METHODS: Data were obtained from 17 diabetes outpatient clinics in Sweden, employing the same diabetes data management system. Type 1 diabetic patients using multiple dose injections were included prior to starting on either CSII (n = 563) or glargine (n = 513). The median duration of therapy was 25 months for CSII and 6 months for glargine. The comparison between the treatment modalities was carried out by multiple regression analysis and logistic regression analysis in an attempt at reducing the influence of confounding factors. RESULTS: The mean HbA1c decrease was 0.59 +/- 1.19% for CSII and 0.20 +/- 1.07% for glargine (P < 0.001, when assessed by logistic regression). An additional 0.1% lower HbA1c would be expected if glargine had been optimized with basal insulin 40-60% of the daily dose. The more pronounced effect of CSII was achieved with a lower daily dosage of insulin. In a multiple regression analysis with a change of HbA1c as the dependent variable, the following variables were significant: choice of treatment (P < 0.001), HbA1c prior to treatment (P < 0.001) and BMI prior to treatment (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Both regimes improved metabolic control, but CSII resulted in significantly higher reduction in HbA1c than after insulin glargine treatment, particularly in those individuals who had higher levels of HbA1c at baseline.     

Safety of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion: Metabolic deterioration and glycaemic autoregulation after deliberate cessation of infusion

Summary To assess the rate of metabolic deterioration and potential risks of failure of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion during basal insulin delivery, we deliberately stopped infusion in nine insulin dependent diabetics. Plasma glucose, blood 3-hydroxybutyrate and plasma free insulin were measured for 9 h whilst the patients remained supine and fasting. Mean plasma glucose remained unchanged at normal fasting levels for the first hour, then rose to plateau at about 10 mmol/l until the end of the experiment. The final plateau level of glucose varied from patient to patient; two C-peptide secreting diabetics plateaued at low glucose levels. In contrast, blood 3-hydroxybutyrate rose progressively, without plateauing. Plasma free insulin concentrations fell during the withdrawal period and there was a highly significant negative correlation between free insulin and 3-hydroxybutyrate. No patient was more than mildly unwell after 9 h of insulin deprivation. We conclude that under these experimental conditions there is glycaemic autoregulation and that ketones may sometimes be a more appropriate monitor of insulin deficiency or loss of diabetic control than is glucose. Accidental failure of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and interruption of basal delivery in resting and fasting diabetics will probably not cause dangerous metabolic or clinical deterioration.     

Severe hypoglycaemia and glycaemic control in Type 1 diabetes: meta‐analysis of multiple daily insulin injections compared with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion

Aims Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) is a recommended treatment for reducing severe hypoglycaemia in Type 1 diabetes, but the change in hypoglycaemia compared with multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) is unclear. We therefore conducted a meta‐analysis comparing severe hypoglycaemia and glycaemic control during CSII and MDI. Methods Databases and literature (1996–2006) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and before/after studies of ≥ 6 months’ duration CSII and with severe hypoglycaemia frequency > 10 episodes/100 patient years on MDI. Results In 22 studies (21 reports), severe hypoglycaemia during MDI was related to diabetes duration (P = 0.038) and was greater in adults than children (100 vs. 36 events/100 patient years, P = 0.036). Severe hypoglycaemia was reduced during CSII compared with MDI, with a rate ratio of 2.89 (95% CI 1.45 to 5.76) for RCTs and 4.34 (2.87 to 6.56) for before/after studies [rate ratio 4.19 (2.86 to 6.13) for all studies]. The reduction was greatest in those with the highest initial severe hypoglycaemia rates on MDI (P < 0.001). The mean difference in glycated haemoglobin (HbA_1c) between treatments was less for RCTs [0.21% (0.13–0.30%)] than in before/after studies [0.72% (0.55–0.90%)] but strongly related to the initial HbA_1c on MDI (P < 0.001). Conclusions The severe hypoglycaemia rate in Type 1 diabetes was markedly less during CSII than MDI, with the greatest reduction in those with most severe hypoglycaemia on MDI and those with the longest duration of diabetes. The biggest improvement in HbA_1c was in those with the highest HbA_1c on MDI.     

A morning dose of insulin glargine prevents nocturnal ketosis after postprandial interruption of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion with insulin lispro

AIM: The aim of this crossover trial was to evaluate the potential of partial substitution of basal insulin with glargine, administered once daily in the morning, to protect against nocturnal ketosis after postprandial interruption of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). METHODS: Seven patients with type 1 diabetes received 4 weeks of treatment with insulin lispro, administered by CSII, and 4 weeks of treatment with CSII and a partial basal replacement dose of insulin glargine administered in the morning. On day 28 of each treatment phase, patients were admitted to the research unit where dinner was served and their usual dinner insulin bolus dose given, after which CSII was discontinued at 7 pm. Plasma (p) beta-hydroxybutyrate and p glucose were measured every hour for 12 h thereafter. RESULTS: Plasma beta-hydroxybutyrate at 7 pm was 0.16+/-0.05 and 0.13+/-0.07 mmol/l with and without glargine, respectively, and increased to 0.17+/-0.10 and 0.60+/-0.3 mmol/l within 6 h (P=0.02). Plasma glucose increased without glargine, from 8.6+/-2.9 to 21.1+/-3.0 mmol/l (P=0.003), but did not rise significantly following glargine (13.6+/-4.7 vs. 12.6+/-5.6 mmol/l; P=0.65). CONCLUSIONS: Partial replacement with a morning dose of insulin glargine protects against the development of ketosis for as much as 12 h after postprandial interruption of CSII. This treatment strategy could, therefore, be useful for patients who are prone to ketosis but, for other reasons, are deemed suitable for CSII.     

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) versus conventional injection therapy in newly diagnosed diabetic children: two-year follow-up of a randomized, prospective trial

The effect of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), begun at diagnosis, on blood glucose control and endogenous insulin production was studied in a group of consecutively referred newly diagnosed diabetic children. In a random order, 15 children started CSII (age 9.5 +/- 4.2 (+/- SD) years) and 15 conventional injection therapy (age 7.0 +/- 3.6 years). For 2 years HbA1 and urinary C-peptide were measured monthly, C-peptide responses to glucagon 6-monthly, and insulin antibodies every 3 months. None of the patients requested change of therapy during the study period, but at 28 months 1 adolescent girl changed to injection therapy from CSII. Severe hypoglycaemia was observed once in each group, but ketoacidosis only once, in the injection therapy group. From 2 months after diagnosis onwards the CSII group had significantly lower HbA1 levels. Urinary and plasma C-peptide levels did not differ between the two groups and similar insulin doses were used throughout the study. At the end of the 2 years of therapy, the CSII group had significantly lower insulin antibody levels. The observations suggest that CSII is well accepted in newly diagnosed children and improves metabolic control, but does not prolong endogenous insulin production.     

Remission from insulin dependence induced by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in type I,newly diagnosed diabetics: Role of some hormonal and immunologic factors

Summary Optimal and early control of recent onset, type I diabetes by intensive insulin therapy has been reported to allow insulin withdrawal in about two thirds of subjects treated. We used continuous s.c. insulin infusion (CSII) in the attempt to induce a temporary remission of insulin dependence in 18 newly diagnosed young adult diabetics. After 10 days of optimized glycometabolic control, insulin infusion was stopped and patients were switched to glibenclamide (15 mg/die) plus metformin (1 g/die). Diabetics were considered in remission of insulin dependence when their metabolic control fulfilled the following criteria for at least 3 months: absence of glycosuria, pre- and post-prandial blood glucose ≤ 120 and 180 mg/dl, respectively, HbA_lc ≤ 7%. Insulin therapy could be discontinued for periods of over three months in 11 subjects (61%) and for as long as 18 months in one case. Insulin requirement during CSII was slightly higher in non-remitters (NR) than in remitters (R): 0.36–0.64vs 0.26–0.41 U/kg/die. After 24 months from CSII, R still showed lower insulin requirement (0.35–0.42 U/kg/die) than NR (0.55–0.75 U/kg/die). Further, the role of some hormonal and immunologic factors was investigated. Plasma C-peptide and glucagon were measured, fasting and 2h after each meal, both on admission and immediately after CSII, when patients were switched to oral therapy. No difference in hormone levels could be detected on admission, whereas, after CSII, mean post-prandial increase of C-peptide over basal was significantly higher in R than in NR (1.18 ± 0.37vs 0.22 ± 0.16 ng/ml, p<0.001). Finally, blood distribution of T, B, T4 and T8 lymphocyte subsets was measured in all patients, both before and after CSII. The T4/T8 ratio was found to be significantly increased in NR group patients (3.19 ± 0.45vs 2.41 ± 0.23, p<0.005). The immunologic pattern did not show any significant modification after ten days of optimized control by CSII. In conclusion, immunologic background and residual B-cell function may be associated with a different susceptibility to remission from insulin therapy in newly diagnosed young adult diabetics.     

Metabolic control and complications in Italian people with diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion

Background and aim

The objective of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the degree of glycaemic control and the frequency of diabetic complications in Italian people with diabetes who were treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII).

Altered recognition of hypoglycaemic symptoms in type I diabetes during intensified control with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion

The effect of intensified metabolic control obtained with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) on the frequency and symptoms of hypoglycaemia was studied in type I diabetic patients. The reproducibility of the questionnaire used to evaluate the hypoglycaemic symptoms was verified in a control group receiving unchanged conventional insulin therapy for 2 months. Metabolic control was significantly improved during CSII (HbA1c 6.8 +/- 0.4% versus 8.7 +/- 0.7%, normal range up to 5.4%) in all patients while no change was seen in the control group. The results of frequent self glucose monitoring showed that the incidence of low glucose levels (below 3.5 mmol/l) increased about threefold in the CSII group. Awareness of hypoglycaemia was clearly changed during CSII with less pronounced adrenergic symptoms while no alterations were found in the group with unchanged metabolic control. These results emphasize the importance of regular self glucose monitoring during CSII and of informing the patients that their hypoglycaemic symptoms may change during intensified control.     

Short-term subcutaneous insulin infusion in diabetic children. Comparison with three daily insulin injections

Summary Sixteen insulin-dependent diabetic children and adolescents were studied on intenisifed insulin treatment (3II) and during continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). Mean blood glucose, M-value and 24-h glycosuria were similar in both types of treatment. Symptomatic hypoglycemia occurred more often in patients on 3II than CSII. With 3II we observed blood glucose peaks early in the morning confirming that better overnight control can be achieved by CSII. Supported byConsiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Grant No. 80.00410.     

Low subcutaneous degradation and slow absorption of insulin in insulin-dependent diabetic patients during continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion at basal rate

Summary As information on the absorption kinetics and local degradation of infused insulin is relevant to programming strategies for continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, we examined the time relationship of systemic insulin appearance and quantitated subcutaneous degradation during a near-basal rate of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in five insulin-dependent diabetic patients. Plasma free insulin was monitored for 8 h during and 3 h after a subcutaneous (abdominal wall) infusion of neutral insulin at 2.4 U/h. An identical intravenous infusion (2–4 h) was given on a separate occasion. Plateau levels of free insulin were not significantly different during the subcutaneous (37±8 mU/l) and intravenous (40±7 mU/l) infusions. Fitting of the free insulin data to our two-pool model of the subcutaneous space gave a mean estimate of 9.2 units insulin (= 3.8 h infusion) for the subcutaneous depot after 8 h. Model estimates of systemic insulin appearance, as a percentage of subcutaneous infusion rate, were 59% and 93% after 4 and 8 h respectively, and 76% 2 h after cessation of infusion. In insulin-dependent diabetic patients subcutaneous degradation of infused insulin is negligible but local accumulation in the subcutaneous space is considerable. The delay in absorption has important clinical implications for interruption and resumption of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and also for programming of variable basal rates.     

A nationwide study of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in Denmark.

AIMS: To record the number of patients treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), the attitude to CSII treatment among diabetes care providers and the characteristics of pump users in Denmark. METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to all departments of endocrinology, internal medicine and paediatrics in Denmark (n = 73) to determine the number of diabetic patients treated with CSII and the attitudes of chief consultants to it. All patients using CSII were identified and data from their records collected. RESULTS: Primarily Type 1 diabetic patients (n = 142) were treated with CSII, approx. 0.5% of patients in Denmark. The explanations given for this low frequency varied for non-CSII and CSII-using diabetologists. Both found lack of funding important. In addition, the non-CSII-using group had a perception that CSII was dangerous. The CSII-using diabetologists found that no more patients were interested and that it did not significantly improve metabolic control. The mean age of pump users was 48.1 +/- 10.5 years and the mean time wearing a pump 14.1 +/- 6.3 years. Mean HbA1c was 7.9 +/- 1.2% during CSII, with a significant difference among the 15 centres (P < 0.05) and a tendency to be lower in females (P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: CSII is infrequently used in Denmark despite pump users showing reasonably good metabolic control. The most common explanations for these low figures are lack of expertise and funding for CSII. If more patients in Denmark were to be offered pumps, education of healthcare providers would be needed and the funding would have to be clarified.     

A feasibility study of the use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in a diabetic clinic: patients' choice of treatment

Insulin-treated diabetic patients attending a busy diabetic clinic were approached to determine their interest in using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) via a portable pump. Three hundred and eighty-two patients were offered the choice of CSII, intensified conventional therapy (ICT) or continuation of less intensified treatment. One hundred and sixteen patients (30.4%) chose CSII, 169 (44.2%) chose ICT, 97 (25.4%) chose the less intensive regimen. Those choosing CSII represented a broad cross section of the clinic population, though older patients with a longer duration of diabetes tended to continue with less intensified therapy. There were no differences between groups in the level of blood glucose control or the prevalence of complications at the outset of the study. Of 104 patients not previously using CSII, 86 have so far commenced the therapy. Twenty-seven (32.6%) of these discontinued within one year, 23 doing so in the first three months of treatment. Metabolic control, assessed by glycosylated haemoglobin, was significantly improved in the CSII group after three months and in the other treatment groups by six months. Glycosylated haemoglobin levels achieved with CSII were significantly lower at three and six months when compared with the other treatments.     

Quality of life and treatment satisfaction in adults with Type 1 diabetes: a comparison between continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and multiple daily injections

Aims The aim of this case–control study was to compare quality of life (QoL) and treatment satisfaction in adults with Type 1 diabetes (T1DM) treated with either continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) or multiple daily injections (MDI). Methods Consecutive patients aged between 18 and 55 years, and attending diabetes clinics for a routine visit, completed the Diabetes‐Specific Quality‐of‐Life Scale (DSQOLS), the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) and the SF‐36 Health Survey (SF‐36). Case (CSII) and control subjects (MDI) were recruited in a 1 : 2 ratio. Results Overall, 1341 individuals were enrolled by 62 diabetes clinics; 481 were cases and 860 control subjects. Cases had a longer diabetes duration and were more likely to have eye and renal complications. Age, school education, occupation and HbA_1c were similar. Of control subjects, 90% followed glargine‐based MDI regimens and 10% used NPH‐based MDI regimens. On multivariate analysis, after adjusting for socioeconomic and clinical characteristics, scores in the following areas of the DSQOLS were higher in cases than control subjects: diet restrictions (β = 5.96; P < 0.0001), daily hassles (β = 3.57; P = 0.01) and fears about hypoglycaemia (β = 3.88; P = 0.006). Treatment with CSII was also associated with a markedly higher DTSQ score (β = 4.13; P < 0.0001) compared with MDI. Results were similar when CSII was compared separately with glargine‐ or NPH‐based MDI regimens. Conclusions This large, non‐randomized, case–control study suggests quality of life gains deriving from greater lifestyle flexibility, less fear of hypoglycaemia, and higher treatment satisfaction, when CSII is compared with either glargine‐based or NPH‐based MDI regimens.     

Efficacy of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in Type 1 diabetes: a 2-year perspective using the established criteria for funding from a National Health Service.

AIM: To determine the 2-year efficacy of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) following the current established criteria for funding of a National Health Service. METHODS: Longitudinal, prospective, observational unicentre study. Included in the study were 153 Type 1 diabetes (T1D) subjects, previously treated with multiple daily injections (MDI) of insulin, in whom CSII was started in accordance with the criteria for reimbursement of the Catalan National Health Service. At baseline, we recorded data on age, gender, duration of the disease, body mass index (BMI), insulin dose and indications for CSII. Glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) and the frequency of hypoglycaemic events were used to assess glycaemic control. Quality of life was assessed using three different self-report questionnaires. After 24 months, these same items were remeasured in all subjects. Serious adverse events and injection-site complications were also recorded. RESULTS: In 96% of subjects, CSII indication included less than optimal glycaemic control using MDI. HbA(1c) fell from 7.9 +/- 1.3 to 7.3 +/- 1.1% (P < or = 0.001) after 24 months of CSII. Insulin requirements were significantly lower at the end of follow-up (0.55 +/- 0.21 U/kg body weight) in comparison with before use of CSII (0.70 +/- 0.20, P < or = 0.001). BMI increased from 24.0 +/- 3.1 to 24.4 +/- 3.2 kg/m(2) after 24 months (P < or = 0.025). The rate of episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis per year remained unchanged. Mild and severe hypoglycaemic episodes were significantly reduced. The scores in all subsets of the Diabetes Quality-of-Life (DQoL) questionnaire significantly improved after 24 months of CSII. CONCLUSIONS: CSII, commenced according to the criteria for a nationally funded clinical programme, improves glycaemic control and quality-of-life outcomes with fewer hypoglycaemic episodes in T1D subjects previously conventionally treated with MDI.