Sentinel lymph node biopsy examination for breast cancer patients with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND: The feasibility and accuracy of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy examination for breast cancer patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have been investigated under the administration of a radiocolloid imaging agent injected intradermally over a tumor. In addition, conditions that may affect SLN biopsy detection and false-negative rates with respect to clinical tumor response and clinical nodal status before NAC were analyzed. METHODS: Seventy-seven patients with stages II and III breast cancer previously treated with NAC were enrolled in the study. All patients were clinically node negative after NAC. The patients then underwent SLN biopsy examination, which involved a combination of intradermal injection over the tumor of radiocolloid and a subareolar injection of blue dye. This was followed by standard level I/II axillary lymph node dissection. RESULTS: The SLN could be identified in 72 of 77 patients (identification rate, 93.5%). In 69 of 72 patients (95.8%) the SLN accurately predicted the axillary status. Three patients had a false-negative SLN biopsy examination result, resulting in a false-negative rate of 11.1% (3 of 27). The SLN identification rate tended to be higher, although not statistically significantly, among patients who had clinically negative axillary lymph nodes before NAC (97.6%; 41 of 42). This is in comparison with patients who had a positive axillary lymph node before NAC (88.6%; 31 of 35). CONCLUSIONS: The SLN identification rate and false-negative rate were similar to those in nonneoadjuvant studies. The SLN biopsy examination accurately predicted metastatic disease in the axilla of patients with tumor response after NAC and clinical nodal status before NAC. This diagnostic technique, using an intradermal injection of radiocolloid, may provide treatment guidance for patients after NAC.     

Accuracy of selective sentinel lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: effect of clinical node status at presentation

BACKGROUND: Both neoadjuvant chemotherapy and selective sentinel lymphadenectomy (SSL) are increasingly being used in treating primary breast cancer. It is important to determine whether SSL can be used after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and whether clinical node status at presentation affects accuracy of SSL. STUDY DESIGN: Between 1995 and 2003, 53 evaluable cases of invasive breast cancer were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by SSL and completion axillary node dissection. The accuracy of SSL and the number of failed SSLs were assessed in the entire group and in the subset that were clinically node positive at presentation. RESULTS: The sensitivity of SSL was 96%, the negative predictive value was 96%, and the sentinel node identification rate was 94%. Of the 53 evaluable patients, 23 had clinically node-positive disease at presentation (43%) and the remainder were clinically node negative (57%). Of the successfully completed SSL, the status of the sentinel lymph node corresponded to that of overall axillary status in 49 of 50 patients (accuracy rate 98%). Two of the 23 patients with clinically node-positive disease at presentation had unsuccessful SSL. Of the remaining 21 patients with a clinically positive axilla before systemic therapy, a false-negative SSL result occurred in 1 patient (accuracy 95%, sensitivity 91%). CONCLUSIONS: Selective sentinel lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is both feasible and accurate. Although early reports found a lower performance of SSL after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, this study suggests reevaluation of the current practice of full axillary lymph node dissection in this setting, particularly in those patients who are clinically node negative at presentation.     

Axillary staging using ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in locally advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node status is important for staging and planning therapy prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancers (LABC). The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of axillary ultrasonography coupled with fine needle aspiration biopsy (US-FNAB) to determine lymph node status prior to initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with a LABC, defined as a breast cancer clinically larger than 3.0 cm or a cytology positive axillary lymph node, were evaluated by clinical examination followed by ultrasonographic evaluation. Lymph nodes were categorized as suspicious for malignancy based on size >1.0 cm, decrease in the fatty hilum, or parenchymal echogenicity. US-FNAB was performed on all patients. Most patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by definitive surgery. Axillary surgery consisted of axillary lymph node dissection. Axillary status by clinical examination and US-FNAB was compared with that obtained by axillary node dissection. RESULTS: From January 1998 to May 2001, 26 patients (27 axillae) presented with LABC to our institution. The median age of these patients was 48 years. The sensitivity and specificity of US-FNAB for evaluating axillary metastatic disease in patients with LABC were 100% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with locally advanced breast cancer, axillary ultrasonography coupled with fine needle aspiration biopsy can accurately stage the axilla. It is particularly useful and should be used more frequently in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The use of ultrasonography to stage the axilla in patients who present with small breast cancers should be explored.     

Accurate axillary nodal staging can be achieved after neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced breast cancer

Lymph node status remains the most important prognostic indicator for breast cancer. Recent reports have established that the accuracy of assessing lymph node status is proportional to the number of nodes dissected. The accuracy of axillary staging following neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been cited as a technical concern due to limited node retrieval. The current study attempts to evaluate the ability to perform sentinel node biopsy (SNB) and formal axillary node dissection (AND) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and to compare these results with non-neoadjuvant patients. One hundred sixteen consecutive patients undergoing SNB with simultaneous AND were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-two of these patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to AND. Overall success rate in performing SNB in the neoadjuvant group was 95 per cent, and no false negatives have been noted to date. The overall SNB success rate in the non-neoadjuvant group was also 95 per cent with a false negative rate of 3 per cent. After AND in each group, a mean of 21 nodes were retrieved in the neoadjuvant group and 17.9 nodes in the non-neoadjuvant group (P = 0.018). In the neoadjuvant group, there were 19 node positive patients (42%) and 21 patients (28%) in the non-neoadjuvant group (P = 0.16). The mean number of positive nodes per patient was also similar between the two groups (2.9 in the neoadjuvant group vs 1.67 in the non-neoadjuvant group, P = 0.10). Following neoadjuvant therapy, accurate evaluation of the axilla is feasible. In this study, the mean number of nodes is significantly different in favor of the neoadjuvant group, but there is no significant difference in the number of node positive patients identified or in the mean number of positive nodes identified per patient. SNB is technically feasible with accuracy similar to that seen in patients with no history of neoadjuvant therapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy extends the use of breast-conserving therapy without sacrificing the ability to accurately stage the axilla either by use of standard axillary dissection or SNB.     

Sentinel Node Biopsy Before Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Spares Breast Cancer Patients Axillary Lymph Node Dissection

Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients is a valuable method to determine the efficacy of chemotherapy and potentially downsize the primary tumor, which facilitates breast-conserving therapy. In 18 studies published about sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the sentinel node was identified in on average 89%, and the false-negative rate was on average 10%. Because of these mediocre results, no author dares to omit axillary clearance just yet. In our institute, sentinel lymph node biopsy is performed before neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate our experience with this approach. Methods Sentinel node biopsy was performed before neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 25 T2N0 patients by using lymphoscintigraphy, a gamma ray detection probe, and patent blue dye. Axillary lymph node dissection was performed after chemotherapy if the sentinel node contained metastases. Results Ten patients had a tumor-positive axillary sentinel node, and one patient had an involved lateral intramammary node. Four patients had additional involved nodes in the completion lymph node dissection specimen. The other 14 patients (56%) had a tumor-negative sentinel node and did not undergo axillary lymph node dissection. No recurrences have been observed after a median follow-up of 18 months. Conclusions Fourteen (56%) of the 25 patients were spared axillary lymph node dissection when the sentinel node was found to be disease free. Performing sentinel node biopsy before neoadjuvant chemotherapy seems successful and reliable in patients with T2N0 breast cancer.     

Implementation of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1071 Trial Data in Clinical Practice: Is There a Way Forward for Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?

For clinically node-positive breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, approximately 40 % will be found to be pathologically node negative. The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1071 trial was therefore conducted to evaluate sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) in these patients. The trial’s primary end point was to determine the false-negative rate (FNR) among patients with clinical N1 disease in whom at least 2 sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were identified. The FNR was 12.6 %, which exceeded the prespecified end point of 10.0 %. After data publication, our multidisciplinary team discussed the trial results and how we may incorporate the findings into clinical practice. Patient selection and surgical technique are critical. As an example, when dual tracer technique was used, the FNR was 10.8 %. Data from the trial presented at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium suggested that the FNR could be improved if a clip was placed in the biopsy-proven positive lymph node and removal of that node during SLND was confirmed. Taking this into consideration, we have proposed an approach to surgical management of the axilla in clinically node-positive patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy termed targeted axillary dissection (TAD). TAD involves placing a clip at the time a lymph node is determined to be positive. After completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the clipped node is localized by using a wire or radioactive seed, and during the SLND procedure, all SLNs and the clipped node are removed. We are currently evaluating the efficacy of TAD in axillary staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.     

Axillary Irradiation as an Imperative Alternative to Axillary Dissection in Clinically Lymph Node-Negative but Sentinel Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients?

At the moment, positive sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) of the axilla is followed by axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) as standard of care. Recent data proves that omitting ALND after positive SLND in clinically lymph node-negative early stage breast cancer patients is feasible with low recurrence rates. The well known effect of radiotherapy to destroy occult tumor cells highly contributes to these results as a large extent of level I and II lymph nodes are unavoidably included in standard tangential radiation treatment fields. Reviewing the up to date published data on axillary lymph node treatment with radiotherapy, we hypothesize that full dosage coverage of level I and II of the axilla in early stage breast cancer will improve outcome and should be further evaluated.     

Scientific Presentation Award: The combination of axillary ultrasound and ultrasound-guided biopsy is an accurate predictor of axillary stage in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND: The study aim was to determine the accuracy of axillary ultrasound (AUS) and fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB)/needle core biopsy in axillary breast cancer staging. METHODS: We reviewed 256 patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer who underwent AUS +/- FNAB/needle core biopsy. AUS-guided FNAB/needle core biopsy was compared with histopathology to determine sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value. RESULTS: AUS-guided FNAB/needle core biopsy and final pathology were positive in 72 of 256 patients (28%). In 125 of 256 cases (49%), the AUS and final pathology were negative. Two of 110 patients had a false-positive FNAB (1.8%); both received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Nine patients (8%) had a false-negative FNAB/needle core biopsy; the median size of lymph node metastasis was 3 mm. The sensitivity and specificity of AUS-guided FNAB/needle core biopsy was 71% and 99%, respectively, with a negative predictive value of 84% and a positive predictive value of 97%. CONCLUSIONS: AUS-guided FNAB/needle core biopsy is accurate in predicting the status of the axilla in 70% of clinically node-negative breast cancer patients. This technique is minimally invasive with a low complication rate and can obviate the need for staged lymph node procedures.     

The predictive value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in locally advanced breast cancer patients who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy

With the increasing usage of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), there is the need to investigate the routine axillary node dissections performed in this group of patients. Controversy exists about the utility of sentinel node biopsy (SNB), either before or after NAC. With the addition of trastuzumab in the treatment of Her2/neu-positive LABC patients, the validity of SNB in this subset population needs to be investigated. A retrospective study of 20 patients who underwent NAC for LABC was undertaken. The pathology of the axillary nodes, sentinel nodes, and primary tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were examined. Twenty patients underwent NAC with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, followed sequentially by paclitaxel and carboplatin, with or without trastuzumab based on Her2/neu status. Post chemotherapy, 20 patients underwent mastectomy or lumpectomy with SNB with axillary node dissections. The overall accuracy of SNB was 95 per cent with a false-negative rate of 14 per cent (1/7). In Her2/neu-positive patients, overall accuracy was 100 per cent (8/8) and a false-negative rate of zero per cent. Sentinel node biopsy is a viable option in patients who have undergone NAC. Her2/neu-positive patients who had undergone NAC with trastuzumab had comparable accuracy for sentinel node biopsy in predicting axillary node status.     

Role of axillary lymph node dissection after tumor downstaging with induction chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer

Background: Induction chemotherapy has become the standard of care for patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) and currently is being evaluated in prospective clinical trials in patients with earlier-stage disease. To better gauge the role of axillary lymph node dissection in patients with LABC this study was performed to assess initial axillary status on physical and ultrasound examination, axillary tumor downstaging following induction chemotherapy, and the accuracy of physical examination compared with axillary sonography in predicting which patients will have axillary lymph node metastases found on pathologic examination. Methods: Between 1992 and 1996, 147 consecutive patients with LABC were registered in a prospective trial of induction chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide. Physical and ultrasound examinations of the axilla were performed at diagnosis and after induction chemotherapy. Segmental resection with axillary lymph node dissection or modified radical mastectomy was performed, followed by postoperative chemotherapy and irradiation of the breast or chest wall and regional lymphatics. Results: Following induction chemotherapy, 43 (32%) of the 133 patients with clinically positive lymph nodes on initial examination had axillary tumor downstaging as assessed by physical and ultrasound examination. The sensitivity of axillary sonography in identifying axillary metastases was significantly higher than that of physical examination (62% vs. 45%,P=.012). The specificity of physical examination (84%) was higher than that of sonography (70%), but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Among the 55 patients in whom the findings of both physical and ultrasound examination of the axilla were negative following induction chemotherapy, 29 patients (53%) were found to have axillary lymph node metastases on pathologic examination of the axillary contents. However, 28 (97%) of these patients had either 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes or only micrometastases 2 to 5 mm in diameter. Conclusions: Preoperative clinical assessment of the axilla by physical examination combined with ultrasound examination is not completely accurate in predicting metastases in patients with LABC following tumor downstaging. However, patients with negative findings on both physical and ultrasound examinations of the axilla may be potential candidates for omission of axillary dissection if the axilla will be irradiated because minimal axillary disease remains. Patients who have positive findings on preoperative physical or ultrasound examinations should receive axillary dissection to ensure local control. A prospective randomized trial of axillary dissection versus axillary radiotherapy in patients with a clinically negative axilla following induction chemotherapy is currently underway.Presented at the 51st Annual Cancer Symposium of The Society of Surgical Oncology, San Diego, California, March 28, 1998.     

Axillary and Extra-axillary Lymph Node Recurrences after a Tumor-Negative Sentinel Node Biopsy for Breast Cancer Using Intralesional Tracer Administration

Background At our institution, tracer fluids are administered in the primary breast cancer and, in addition to the ones in the axilla, sentinel nodes outside the axilla are rigorously pursued. The objective of the present study of sentinel node-negative breast cancer patients was to determine the lymph node recurrence rates in the axilla and elsewhere, the false-negative rates, and the survival. Methods Between January 1999 and November 2005, 1,019 breast cancer patients underwent a sentinel node biopsy. In 748 of them, 755 sentinel node biopsies did not reveal a tumor-positive sentinel node and they did not undergo axillary node dissection. Metastases were revealed in 284 sentinel node biopsies performed in the remaining 271 patients: 247 in the axilla, 20 outside the axilla, and 17 both in the axilla and elsewhere. The median follow-up duration was 46 months. Results Two of the 748 sentinel node-negative patients developed an axillary lymph node recurrence (0.25%) and two others developed a supraclavicular lymph node recurrence (0.25%). The overall lymph node recurrence rate was 0.5%. The false-negative rates were 1.4% overall, 0.8% for the axilla, and 5.1% for the extra-axillary nodes. After five years, 95.9% of all sentinel node-negative patients were alive and 89.7% were alive without evidence of disease. Conclusion The low recurrence and false-negative rates and promising survival figures show that our lymphatic mapping method with intralesional tracer administration is accurate for the axilla. Outside the axilla, 5.1% of involved sentinel nodes were missed.     

Accuracy of axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy following neoadjuvant (induction) chemotherapy for carcinoma of the breast

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is widely employed to detect axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with clinically negative (N0) axillae. One of the few reported contraindications to SLNB is prior treatment with systemic chemotherapy (neoadjuvant/induction chemotherapy). Previous investigators reported difficulty identifying the sentinel node and an unacceptable false-negative rate in this patient cohort. We present one experienced surgeon's experience with SLNB following induction chemotherapy (n = 21). Following treatment with Adriamycin and Cytoxan (AC)-based cyclic chemotherapy, patients underwent SLNB, followed by levels I and II axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). At least one sentinel node was identified in all patients (100%). With respect to metastatic disease, the status of the sentinel node(s) accurately reflected the status of the axilla in 20 of 21 patients (95%). Eleven patients (52%) had axillary metastases identified by ALND. Of this group, SLNB failed to identify metastatic disease in one patient (9%). Previous treatment with induction chemotherapy should not be considered an absolute contraindication to SLNB. An experienced surgeon may utilize the technique in these patients, sparing them the added morbidity of axillary dissection.     

Sentinel node biopsy prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND: Several studies have explored sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but false negative rates and the loss of pretreatment nodal staging are limitations. Sentinel lymph node biopsy prior to induction chemotherapy may address both. METHODS: Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed in clinically node negative patients prior to initiating chemotherapy. Standard level I/II axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was performed at the time of surgery in those patients who had metastases in the sentinel lymph node (SLN). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients had 26 SLNB prior to the initiation of chemotherapy. The SLN was identified in all cases (100%). Twelve patients (48%) were found to be node negative and did not require axillary node dissection after chemotherapy. Of the patients who were SLN positive and underwent completion ALND, residual nodal disease was identified in 60%. There were no surgical complications or delay of chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel lymph node biopsy prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy can avoid the morbidity of ALND without compromising the accuracy of axillary staging. It allows for identification of node positive patients subsequently rendered disease free in the regional nodes, which can assist in planning additional chemotherapy or radiation.     

Sentinel Node Biopsy Before Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Determining Axillary Status and Treatment Prognosis in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

Background Treatment of locally advanced breast cancer with neoadjuvant chemotherapy assesses an in vivo tumor response while increasing breast conservation. Axillary clearance of nodal disease after treatment defines prognostic stratification. Our study objective was to show that sentinel node staging before treatment can optimize posttreatment prognostic stratification in clinically N0 patients. Methods Eighty-nine patients with locally advanced breast cancer were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Of these, 42 (47%) clinically palpable or image-detected nodes (cN+) were histologically confirmed before treatment (group 1), and 47 (53%) patients without palpable lymph nodes (cN0) had a sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy before treatment (group 2). Survival analysis was conducted with the Kaplan-Meier method. Results In groups 1 and 2, 82 (92%) of 89 patients had node-positive disease before treatment. Seven (8%) of 89 had negative SLNs and no completion axillary lymph node dissection, 24 (27%) patients had a complete pathologic axillary response (pCR^AX; 11 [26%] of 42 in group 1 and 13 [33%] of 40 in group 2), and 58 (65%) of 89 had residual disease in the axilla. Breast-conserving therapy was applied to 27 (30%) of 89 patients. The seven SLN-negative patients had no axillary recurrence at 25 months, and pCR^AX patients had a significantly higher overall survival than patients with residual disease. Conclusions This study validates the prognostic stratification of patients with a complete pathologic axillary response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The addition of SLN biopsy to cN0 patients before treatment increased accurate nodal staging by 53%, eliminated completion axillary lymph node dissection in 15%, and demonstrated an improved prognosis in 28% of pCR^AX patients. SLN biopsy before treatment provides accurate staging of cN0 patients; allows acquisition of standard treatment markers, prognostic biomarkers, and microarray analysis; and affords prognostic stratification after treatment.     

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Performed After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy is Accurate in Patients with Documented Node-Positive Breast Cancer at Presentation

Background The optimal strategy for incorporating lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy into the management of breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains controversial. Previous studies of sentinel node biopsy performed following neoadjuvant chemotherapy have largely reported on patients whose prechemotherapy, pathologic axillary nodal status was unknown. We report findings using a novel comprehensive approach to axillary management of node-positive-patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods We evaluated 54 consecutive breast cancer patients with biopsy-proven axillary nodal metastases at the time of diagnosis that underwent lymphatic mapping with nodal biopsy as well as concomitant axillary lymph node dissection after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. All cases were treated at a single comprehensive cancer center between 2001 and 2005. Results The sentinel node identification rate after delivery of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 98%. Thirty-six patients (66%) had residual axillary metastases (including eight patients that had undergone resection of metastatic sentinel nodes at the time of diagnosis), and in 12 cases (31%) the residual metastatic disease was limited to the sentinel lymph node. The final, post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy sentinel node was falsely negative in three cases (8.6%). The negative final sentinel node accurately identified patients with no residual axillary disease in 17 cases (32%). Conclusions Sentinel lymph node biopsy performed after the delivery of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with documented nodal disease at presentation accurately identified cases that may have been downstaged to node-negative status and can spare this subset of patients (32%) from experiencing the morbidity of an axillary dissection.     

Incidence and Impact of Documented Eradication of Breast Cancer Axillary Lymph Node Metastases Before Surgery in Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and prognostic significance of documented eradication of breast cancer axillary lymph node (ALN) metastases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care for patients with locally advanced breast cancer and is being evaluated in patients with earlier-stage operable disease. METHODS: One hundred ninety-one patients with locally advanced breast cancer and cytologically documented ALN metastases were treated in two prospective trials of doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients had breast surgery with level I and II axillary dissection followed by additional chemotherapy and radiation treatment. Nodal sections from 43 patients who were originally identified as having negative ALNs at surgery were reevaluated and histologically confirmed to be without metastases. An additional 1112 sections from these lymph node blocks were obtained; half were stained with an anticytokeratin antibody cocktail and analyzed. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Of 191 patients with positive ALNs at diagnosis, 23% (43 patients) were converted to a negative axillary nodal status on histologic examination (median number of nodes removed = 16). Of the 43 patients with complete axillary conversion, 26% (n = 11) had N1 disease and 74% (n = 32) had N2 disease. On univariate analysis, patients with complete versus incomplete histologic axillary conversion were more likely to have initial estrogen-receptor-negative tumors, smaller primary tumors, and a complete pathologic response in the primary tumor. The 5-year disease-free survival rates were 87% in patients with preoperative eradication of axillary metastases and 51% for patients with residual nodal disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Of the 39 patients with complete histologic conversion for whom nodal blocks were available, occult nodal metastases were found in additional nodal sections in 4 patients (10%). At a median follow-up of 61 months, the 5-year disease-free survival rates were 87% in patients without occult nodal metastases and 75% in patients with occult nodal metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can completely clear the axilla of microscopic disease before surgery, and occult metastases are found in only 10% of patients with a histologically negative axilla. The results of this study have implications for the potential use of sentinel lymph node biopsy as an alternative to axillary dissection in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.     

�������ٰ�Ҹ�Ѵ����о��ȵ�

??Research hotspots in axillary treatment for early-stage breast cancer WANG Mao-li,WU Ke-jin. Department of Breast Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200011, China
Corresponding author: WU Ke-jin, E-mail: kejinwu@163.com
Abstract Sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB) has replaced axillary lymph node dissection(ALND) to stage clinically node-negative breast cancer patients. In the patients with low-volume nodal metastasis, ALND could be safely avoided when treated with breast-conserving therapy eligible for Z0011 or IBCSG 23-01, or radiation considered referring to AMAROS. ALND is still recommended for patients with involved axillary nodes received mastectomy and not planned for radiation. Addition of regional nodal irradiation in subgroups of patients reduces locoregional recurrence significantly and should be recommended taken all clinical and pathologic factors considered for individual patients. For patients with clinically node-negative disease, SLNB following neoadjuvant therapy is considered an acceptable approach.Ultrasound-guided biopsy and localization of suspicious axillary lymph nodes before neoadjuvant therapy are preferred. SLNB may be an option after neoadjuvant therapy in patients with proven positive axillary nodes who achieved clinical complete response, given that usage double tracers, biopsy more than 2 sentinel lymph nodes, evaluation the labelled lymph node before neoadjuvant therapy, and stage N0 (i+) may be regarded as the criteria for ALND. ALND remains the standard-of-care for the subset of patients in clinical practice, unless enrolled on some clinical trials. Staying the current of axillary treatments in early-stage breast cancer helps to make wiser clinical decision and organize further in-depth research, so that safe, effective and moderate axillary treatments can be performed.     

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Preoperative Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Findings from the Austrian Sentinel Node Study Group

Background  Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become an accurate alternative to axillary lymph node dissection for early breast cancer. However, data are still insufficient as regards the combination of SLNB with preoperative chemotherapy (PC). Methods  The Austrian Sentinel Node Study Group investigated 167 patients who underwent SLNB and axillary lymph node dissection after 3 to 6 courses of PC. SLNB was limited to patients with a clinically negative axilla after PC. Blue dye was used in 29 cases (17%), and tracers were used in 20 (12%). A combination of the two methods was applied in most patients (n = 120; 72%). Results  At least 1 sentinel lymph node (SLN) was identified in 144 patients (identification rate, 85%): in 86% by blue dye alone, in 65% by tracers alone, and in 88% by a combination of methods. The SLN was positive in 70 women (42%) and was the only positive node with otherwise negative axillary nodes in 39 patients (23%). In 6 cases, the SLN was diagnosed as negative although tumor infiltration was detected in an upper node of the axillary basin (false-negative rate, 8%; 6 of 76 patients; sensitivity, 92%). At least 62 patients (37%) were free of tumor cells in the SLN and in the axillary nodes. Conclusion  The results of SLNB after PC are comparable to the results of SLNB without PC. Further investigation in a prospective setting is warranted to confirm these promising results.     

The Role of Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Axillary Nodes in the Staging of Breast Cancer

Background As a complement to sentinel node dissection (SLND), we evaluated ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (USFNA) of normal and abnormal axillary nodes in breast cancer patients. We hypothesized that USFNA would be accurate for primary breast tumors larger than 2 cm. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 68 patients who underwent 69 preoperative USFNAs from 2003 to 2005. The results of 65 preoperative USFNA were compared with the results of SLND or axillary node dissection (ALND) for concordance. Four USFNAs were excluded from analysis because of a complete response to neoadjuvant therapy. We evaluated whether primary tumor features (histology, size, grade, vascular invasion, estrogen/progesterone receptor status and Her-2-neu status) predicted concordance of USFNA results and the final lymph node pathology. Results Of 65 axillae analyzed, 39 (60%) were positive, four (6%) were non-diagnostic, and 22 (34%) were negative by USFNA. USFNA had 89% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 100% positive predictive value (PPV) in patients with palpable or ultrasonographically suspicious nodes. USFNA sensitivity dropped significantly for nonpalpable, ultrasonographically normal nodes (54%), while specificity and PPV remained 100%. None of the primary tumor features predicted concordance of USFNA and SLND/ALND. Conclusions USFNA of axillary nodes has a high specificity and PPV in clinically or radiologically suspicious nodes. Sensitivity of USFNA is low for nodes of normal appearance, but positive USFNA may allow definitive management of the axilla without a SLND. Thus, USFNA of normal appearing nodes might be beneficial in cases where decisions regarding neoadjuvant chemotherapy would be affected by the results.     

Sentinel node biopsy after primary chemotherapy in breast cancer: a note of caution from results of ABCSG-14

Over the past years, experience has been increasing with lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy (SNB) after preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer, with a wide range of results reported in the literature and final conclusions on the diagnostic value and clinical consequences of this sequential approach still missing. Between 1999 and 2002, the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG) conducted a prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing three versus six preoperative cycles of epirubicin/docetaxel + granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for operable breast cancer. Of the 292 patients recruited to the trial overall, 111 were enrolled in a prospective subprotocol for performing LM and SNB in addition to obligatory axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) after PC. SNB after PC identified at least one sentinel node in 100 of 111 patients (identification rate 90%). In six cases, a false-negative SN was identified, resulting in a false-negative rate of 13% (6 of 47). We only found little correlation between patients and tumor characteristics and the identification rate or false-negative rate. Lymphatic mapping and SNB after primary chemotherapy failed to predict histologic infiltration of the sentinel node with sufficient sensitivity. The routine use of SNB after primary chemotherapy should therefore be discouraged.