Elevated ESR/CRP Ratio Is Associated With Reinfection After Debridement,Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infections

BackgroundRatios of established inflammatory markers, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), have been used for diagnostic purposes in the surgical field; however, the ESR:CRP ratio (ECR) has not been evaluated as a marker for predicting infection resolution in patients with periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ECR in predicting postoperative reinfection in patients who underwent debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR).MethodsThis is a retrospective review of 179 consecutive patients who underwent DAIR revision total joint arthroplasty for PJI. Patients were stratified by acuity of their infection: acute PJI, acute hematogenous PJI, and chronic PJI. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated to evaluate ECR as diagnostic marker for predicting postoperative reinfection in patients who underwent DAIR.ResultsStatistically significant differences in ECR were found in patients who underwent DAIR revision total joint arthroplasty for chronic infection (1.23 vs 2.33; P = .04). There was no significant difference in ECR in patients who underwent DAIR for acute infection (P = .70) and acute hematogenous infection (P = .56). In patients who underwent DAIR for chronic PJI, ECR demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 75% and 84%, respectively, for the prediction of postoperative reinfection, which was significantly higher than that of ESR (sensitivity, 67%; specificity, 47%; P < .001) and CRP (sensitivity, 50%; specificity, 26%; P < .001).ConclusionElevated ECR was associated with an increased reinfection risk in patients who underwent DAIR for chronic PJI, suggesting that preoperative ECR may be a useful predictor to identify patients at increased risk of reinfection after DAIR for chronic PJIs.     

Positive Blood Cultures Decrease the Treatment Success in Acute Hematogenous Periprosthetic Joint Infection Treated With Debridement,Antibiotics, and Implant Retention

BackgroundThe influence of positive blood cultures on surgical outcome of acute hematogenous periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) treated by debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) remains unknown. This study evaluated the influence of positive blood cultures on the treatment success of DAIR in patients with acute hematogenous PJI.MethodsA retrospective chart review on 49 patients with blood culture data for acute hematogenous PJI was performed from 2005 to 2016 at a single institution. All patients were treated by DAIR and had a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Treatment success was defined by the Delphi criteria. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify variables associated with positive blood culture and treatment success. Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves and log-rank tests were used for analysis.ResultsOverall, 44.9% (22/49) of blood cultures obtained yielded positive growth. Elevated Elixhauser comorbidity index was a significant risk factor associated with positive blood (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-2.40; P = .049). A positive blood culture was the only significant factor predicting treatment failure in acute hematogenous PJI (OR, 3.94; 95% CI, 1.18-13.1; P = .026) after adjusting for confounding variables. Kaplan-Meier survivorship for infection-free implant survivorship was 53.1% (95% CI, 38.3%-65.8%) at 1 year for all patients, 66.7% (95% CI, 45.7%-81.1%) for patients with negative blood cultures, and 36.4% (95% CI, 17.2%-55.7%) for patients with positive blood cultures (P = .037).ConclusionThe presence of positive blood cultures is associated with decreased treatment success of DAIR for acute hematogenous PJI. Patients with more comorbidities may need to be treated more aggressively for a favorable outcome.     

Outcome of Debridement,Antibiotics, and Implant Retention With Modular Component Exchange in Acute Culture-Negative Periprosthetic Joint Infections

BackgroundModular component exchange and culture-directed antibiotic treatment is routinely employed for acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, as many as 7%-23% of PJIs have been reported to yield negative culture results. The efficacy of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) with modular component exchange in the setting of acute culture negative PJI remains largely unknown. The aim of our study is to evaluate the outcomes of DAIR with modular component exchange in acute culture-positive and culture-negative PJI.MethodsA total of 149 consecutive patients with primary total joint replacements (90 total knee arthroplasties and 59 total hip arthroplasties) who underwent DAIR with modular component exchange for acute PJI with at least 3 years of follow-up were evaluated: (1) 46 culture-negative PJI patients and (2) 103 culture-positive PJI patients. Reinfection and aseptic revision rates along with complication rates were compared.ResultsThe reinfection rate for DAIR in acute culture-negative PJI was 13.0% compared to 19.4% in culture-positive PJI (P = .48). Mean survival time from reinfection between culture-negative (7.7 ± 0.4 years) and culture-positive (7.4 ± 0.3 years) PJI groups did not differ significantly (P = .40). Aseptic revision rates were 8.7% and 4.9% (P = .46), respectively, with loosening being the primary reason for implant failure in both cohorts.ConclusionsDespite lack of an identifying organism to guide postoperative antibiotic therapy, DAIR with modular component exchange for acute culture-negative PJI was associated with similar reinfection rates compared to acute culture-positive PJI, suggesting that culture negativity may not be a contraindication to DAIR in patients with acute PJI.     

Utilization of Debridement,Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Infection After Total Joint Arthroplasty Over a Decade in the United States

BackgroundReported clinical outcomes have varied for debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) and little is known regarding trends in utilization. We sought to evaluate the rate of DAIR utilization for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) over a decade and clinical factors associated with these trends.MethodsA retrospective study of primary TKAs and THAs was performed using Medicare data from 2005 to 2014 using the PearlDiver database platform. Current Procedural Technology and International Classification of Diseases Ninth Edition codes identified patients who underwent a surgical revision for PJI, whether revision was a DAIR, as well as associated clinical factors including timing from index arthroplasty.ResultsThe proportion of revision TKAs and THAs performed using DAIR was 27% and 12% across all years, respectively. This proportion varied by year for TKAs and THAs with a linear trend toward increasing relative use of DAIR estimated at 1.4% and 0.9% per year (P < .001; P < .001). DAIR for TKA and THA performed within 90 days increased at a faster rate, 3.4% and 2.1% per year (P < .001; P < .001). Trends over time in TKA DAIRs showed an association with Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI), 0-5 group increasing at 2.0% per year (P = .03) and patients >85 years (P = .04).ConclusionThe proportion of revision arthroplasty cases for PJI managed with DAIR has been increasing over time in the United States, with the most substantial increase seen <90 days from index arthroplasty. Age, gender, and ECI had a minimal association with this trend, except in the TKA population >85 years and in those with a very low ECI score.     

Debridement,Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Periprosthetic Joint Infection: What Predicts Success or Failure?

BackgroundDebridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) is the treatment of choice for acute postoperative and acute hematogenous periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). There is limited literature on predictive prognostic factors for DAIR. We aim to report the outcomes of DAIR and investigate the predictive prognostic factors.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 106 DAIRs. Failure was defined as requiring removal of TKA implants. Predictive factors that may influence success of DAIR treatment such as age, gender, body mass index, ethnicity, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, comorbidities, preoperative erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein, symptom duration, time between total knee arthroplasty and DAIR, cultures, rifampicin use, polyethylene liner change, and antibiotic duration were analyzed.ResultsThe success rate of DAIR was 69.8% (74/106 patients). For successes, mean time from DAIR-to-mortality was longer than failures (61.6 ± 42.7 vs 9.75 ± 9.60 months, P = .0150). Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus PJI (odds ratio [OR] 3.64, confidence interval [CI] 1.30-10.2, P = .0140) was a significant predictor for failure of DAIR. Higher preoperative ESR correlated to failure (OR 1.02, CI 1.01-1.04, P = .008). In successes, mean ESR was 75.4 (66.1-84.6), whereas mean ESR in failures was 116 (88.3-143) (P = .011). An ESR > 107.5 predicted failure with a sensitivity of 51.5 and specificity of 85.2. ESR > 107.5 correlated to failure (OR 6.60, CI 2.29-19.0, P < .001). Repeat DAIRs were strongly correlated to failure (OR 5.27, CI 1.99-13.9, P < .01).ConclusionDAIR failure is associated with earlier time to mortality. Repeat DAIRs, elevated ESR > 107.5, and S aureus PJI are associated with treatment failure and 2-stage revision is recommended.     

Differing Microorganism Profile in Early and Late Prosthetic Joint Infections Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty — Implications for Empiric Antibiotic Treatment

BackgroundProsthetic joint infection (PJI) is the leading cause of revision following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Prior to microorganism identification, the choice of the correct empiric antibiotics is critical to treatment success. This study aims to 1) compare the microorganism and resistance profile in early and late PJIs; 2) recommend appropriate empiric antibiotics.MethodsA multicentre retrospective review was performed over a 15-year period. First episode PJIs were classified by both the Tsukayama Classification and Auckland Classification. For each PJI case, the causative organism and antibiotic sensitivity were recorded.ResultsOf eligible patients, 232 culture-positive PJI cases were included. Using either classification system, early PJIs (<4 weeks or <1 year since primary) were significantly more likely to be resistant and polymicrobial. The predominant organisms were coagulase-negative Staphylococci in early PJIs while Staphylococcus aureus was the most common in late PJIs. The distribution of gram-negative cases was higher in early Class-A than late Class-C PJIs (25% versus 6%, P = .004). Vancomycin provided significantly superior coverage when compared to Flucloxacillin for early infections, and addition of a gram-negative agent achieved coverage over 90% using both classification systems.ConclusionBased on the microbiological pattern in Tsukayama criteria, Vancomycin with the consideration of Gram-negative agent should be considered for Class-A infections given the high proportion of resistant and polymicrobial cases. For Class-C infections, Cephazolin or Flucloxacillin is likely sufficient. We recommend antibiotics to be withheld in Class-B infections until cultures and sensitivities are known.     

Irrigation and Debridement With Implant Retention: Does Chronicity of Symptoms Matter?

BackgroundPeriprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a rare, yet devastating complication of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Chronic infection is generally considered a contraindication to debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR); however, outcomes stratified by chronicity have not been well documented.MethodsA retrospective review of all DAIR cases performed at a single institution from 2008 to 2015 was performed. Chronicity of PJI was categorized as acute postoperative, chronic, or acute hematogenous. Failure after DAIR, defined as re-revision for infection recurrence with the same organism, was evaluated between the 3 chronicity groups at 90 days as well as at a minimum 2-year follow-up.ResultsOverall, 248 patients undergoing DAIR for total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty PJI were included. Categorization of PJI was acute (acute postoperative) in 59 cases (24%), chronic in 54 (22%), and acute hematogenous in 135 (54%). DAIR survivorship was 47% (range 0.3-10 years). Overall, there were 118 (47.6%) treatment failures after DAIR with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. There was no difference in failure rate between total hip or total knee arthroplasty patients (P = .07). Patients infected with Staphylococcus conferred a higher risk of failure for all DAIR procedures regardless of chronicity category.ConclusionIdentification of microbial species prior to undertaking DAIR may be more clinically relevant than stratification according to chronicity category when considering treatment options.     

Dislocation After Debridement,Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Periprosthetic Joint Infections of the Hip

BackgroundDebridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is a common treatment option for hip periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, noninfectious outcomes of DAIR such as instability are not well reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate risk factors for hip dislocation post-DAIR for PJI of both primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA).MethodsA retrospective chart review identified all patients who underwent DAIR of a primary or revision THA over a 20-year period with a minimum 1-year follow-up. A total of 151 patients met inclusion criteria, 19.9% of whom had a post-DAIR dislocation. Demographic and intraoperative variables were obtained. Patients who had modular components exchanged during DAIR to those with increased offset, increased “jump distance”, or a more stable acetabular liner were defined as patients who had “components exchanged to increase stability.” Predictors of hip dislocation post-DAIR were inserted into a multivariate linear regression.ResultsPost-DAIR dislocation rates were 16.3% in primary THAs and 25.4% in revision THAs. In patients who had “components exchanged to increase stability” during hip DAIR, there was at least an 11-fold reduction (1/odds ratio (OR), 0.09) in dislocation risk compared to patients who had no components altered during modular component exchange during hip DAIR (OR, 0.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.44; P < .001), while a 13-fold increased dislocation risk was seen in patients with a history of neuromuscular disease (OR, 13.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.73-104.09; P = .01).ConclusionsDuring DAIR of hip PJI, surgeons should consider prophylactically exchanging components to increase stability even if components appear stable intraoperatively.     

Prior Septic Arthritis Within One Year of Knee Arthroplasty is Associated With a High Risk for Infection

BackgroundA prior history of a septic knee may predispose patients to a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We performed multivariate analyses of known risk factors that portend a periprosthetic infection for patients who have a history of septic arthritis (SA). The focus of the study was an assessment of the incidence of TKA PJIs at various time intervals after the onset of a septic knee (0 to 3 months, 3 to 6 months, 6 to 9 months, and 9 months to 1-year).MethodsWe queried a national database to identify patients who underwent a primary TKA between 2010 and 2021 (n = 1.9 million). Patients who had a prior septic knee ipsilateral to the primary TKA were characterized (n = 4,251) and were put into four specific cohorts based on the interval between the SA diagnosis and TKA: less than 3 months; 3 to 6 months; 6 to 9 months; and 9 to 12 months. A cohort of patients who did not have history of septic knee were used for comparison (n = 5,000). The incidence of PJIs from 90 days to 1 year was identified and compared using multivariate analyses.ResultsAll time cohorts were more likely to require revisions due to PJI, as compared to the comparison group. Significant differences were demonstrated among all time cohorts who had prior SA compared to patients who did not have a history of SA (odds ratio [OR] range, 90.0 to 113.0, P < .001).ConclusionThis study has shown an increased PJI risk in the first year after SA (P < .05). The surgeon should be aware of the increased PJI risk after SA within the first year after TKA.     

A Second Surgical Debridement for Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infections Should Not Be Discarded

BackgroundIn acute periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs), a second surgical debridement (debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention [DAIR]) is generally not recommended after a failed first one. We identified the failure rate of a second DAIR and aimed to identify patients in whom an additional debridement might still be beneficial.MethodsPatients with acute PJI of the hip or knee and treated with DAIR between 2006 and 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. A second DAIR was routinely performed provided that the soft tissue was intact. Failure of a second DAIR was described as (1) the need for additional surgical intervention to achieve infection control, (2) the need for antibiotic suppressive therapy due to persistent clinical and/or biochemical signs of infection, or (3) PJI related death.ResultsFrom the 455 cases treated with DAIR, 144 cases underwent a second debridement (34.6%). Thirty-seven cases failed (37/144, 25.7%). The implant needed to be removed in 23 cases (23/144, 16%). Positive cultures during the second DAIR (odds ratio 3.16, 95% confidence interval 1.29-7.74) and chronic renal insufficiency (odds ratio 13.6, 95% confidence interval 2.03-91.33) were independent predictors for failure in the multivariate analysis. No difference in failure was observed between persistent infection with the same microorganism and reinfection with a new microorganism (failure rate 31.6% vs 34.6%, P = .83).ConclusionA second DAIR had a low failure rate in our cohort of patients and the implant could be retained in the majority of them. Therefore, a second DAIR should not be discarded in acute PJIs.     

Accuracy of Predictive Algorithms in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infections Treated With Debridement,Antibiotics, and Implant Retention (DAIR)

BackgroundDebridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) failure remains high for total hip and knee arthroplasty periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). We sought to determine the predictive value of the CRIME80 and KLIC for failure of DAIR in acute hematogenous (AH) and acute postoperative (AP) PJIs, respectively.MethodsWe identified 134 patients who underwent DAIR for AH PJI with <4 weeks of symptoms after index arthroplasty and 122 patients who underwent DAIR for AP PJI <90 days from index. In the AH group, 15 patients (11%) failed at 90 days and overall, 33 (25%) had failed by 2 years. In the AP group, 39 (32%) failed at 90 days and overall, 52 (43%) failed by 2 years. Logistic regression models were used to determine the area under the curve (AUC) to establish thresholds using the Youden index.ResultsFor the AP cohort, AUCs were below 0.66 for KLIC, Charlson comorbidity index, Elixhauser comorbidity index, and McPherson host grade. For the AH cohort, 90-day AUCs were 0.70 for CRIME80 and below 0.66 for Charlson comorbidity index, Elixhauser comorbidity index, and McPherson host grade. In multivariate analysis controlling for age, sex, and body mass index, the CRIME80 AUC improved to 0.77 at 90 days.ConclusionTo the authors’ knowledge, this study represents the first external validation of the KLIC and CRIME80 for predicting DAIR failure in a North American population. The results indicate that alternative methods for predicting DAIR failure at 90 days and 2 years for acute PJI are needed.Level of EvidencePrognostic III.     

Does Early Debridement,Antibiotic Therapy and Implant Retention (DAIR) have a Role in Managing Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Knee in Indian Scenario: A Retrospective Analysis of Outcomes

PurposeTo report outcomes of Debridement, Antibiotic therapy and Implant Retention (DAIR) for periprosthetic knee joint infections (PJI) in the Indian population and to study factors influencing outcomes.MethodsThis was a Retrospective study of 80 cases of acute PJI after total knee arthroplasty who were treated by DAIR, within 2 weeks of onset of infection. A standardised institutional management protocol was applied to all cases. Patients were followed up for a minimum 1 year. Outcomes of DAIR were classified as successful or unsuccessful based on resolution or persistence of infection, and subsequent requirement of revision surgery. Influence of factors, like comorbidities, culture status and microbiological characteristics of causative organism, on outcomes was assessed.ResultsOverall 55 patients (68.75%) had successful eradication of infection after DAIR. 27 (33.7%) patients were culture negative and 53 (66.2%) patients grew organisms on culture. There was no statistically significant difference in outcomes (p = 0.082) between culture-positive cases (69.8% success rate) and (66.7% success rate) in culture negative cases. Furthermore, no difference in outcomes was observed in culture-positive patients between those who grew Gram-positive organisms versus Gram-negative organisms (p = 0.398) Similarly, patient comorbidities did not significantly alter the outcomes after DAIR (p = 0.732).ConclusionOur study demonstrates that early DAIR within 2 weeks of onset of infection using a standard protocol during surgery and postoperatively can result in good outcomes. Patient comorbidities, culture status (positive versus negative), Gram staining characteristics of organisms and the identity of pathogenic bacteria did not influence outcomes of DAIR for acute PJI.     

Treatment and Outcome of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundPeriprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a devastating but poorly understood complication, with a paucity of published data regarding treatment and outcomes. This study analyzes the largest cohort of UKA PJIs to date comparing treatment outcome, septic and aseptic reoperation rates, and risk factors for treatment failure.MethodsTwenty-one UKAs in 21 patients treated for PJI, as defined by Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria, were retrospectively reviewed. Minimum and mean follow-up was 1 and 3.5 years, respectively. Fourteen (67%) patients had acute postoperative PJIs. Surgical treatment included 16 debridement, antibiotics, and implant retentions (DAIRs) (76%), 4 two-stage revisions (19%), and 1 one-stage revision (5%). Twenty (95%) PJIs were culture positive with Staphylococcus species identified in 15 cases (71%).ResultsSurvivorship free from reoperation for infection at 1 year was 76% (95% confidence interval, 58%-93%). Overall survival from all-cause reoperation was 57% (95% confidence interval, 27%-87%) at 5 years. Two additional patients (10%) underwent aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty for lateral compartment degeneration 1 year after DAIR and tibial aseptic loosening 2.5 years after 2-stage revision. All patients who initially failed PJI UKA treatment presented with acute postoperative PJIs (5 of 14; 36%).ConclusionSurvivorship free from persistent PJI at 1 year is low at 76% but is consistent with similar reports of DAIRs for total knee arthroplasties. Furthermore, there is low survivorship free from all-cause reoperation of 71% and 57% at 2 and 5 years, respectively. Surgeons should be aware of these poorer outcomes and consider treating UKA PJI early and aggressively.     

Utility of Diagnostic Markers in Late Periprosthetic Joint Infection Workup for Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients Who Received Antibiotics 48 Hours Before Aspiration

BackgroundDiagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains challenging despite recent advancements in testing and evolving criteria over the last decade. Moreover, the effects of antibiotic use on diagnostic markers are not fully understood. Thus, this study sought to determine the influence of antibiotic use within 48 hours before knee aspiration on synovial and serum laboratory values for suspected late PJI.MethodsPatients who underwent a TKA and subsequent knee arthrocentesis for PJI workup at least 6 weeks after their index arthroplasty were reviewed across a single healthcare system from 2013 to 2020. Median synovial white blood cell (WBC) count, synovial polymorphonuclear (PMN) percentage, serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), serum C-reactive protein (CRP), and serum WBC count were compared between immediate antibiotic and nonantibiotic PJI groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Youden’s index were used to determine test performance and diagnostic cutoffs for the immediate antibiotics group.ResultsThe immediate antibiotics group had significantly more culture-negative PJIs than the no antibiotics group (38.1 versus 16.2%, P = .0124). Synovial WBC count demonstrated excellent discriminatory ability for late PJI in the immediate antibiotics group (area under curve, AUC = 0.97), followed by synovial PMN percentage (AUC = 0.88), serum CRP (AUC = 0.86), and serum ESR (AUC = 0.82).ConclusionAntibiotic use immediately preceding knee aspiration should not preclude the utility of synovial and serum lab values for the diagnosis of late PJI. Instead, these markers should be considered thoroughly during infection workup considering the high rate of culture-negative PJI in these patients.Level of EvidenceLevel III, retrospective comparative study.     

Surgical Helmet Systems Are Associated With a Lower Rate of Prosthetic Joint Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Combined Results From the New Zealand Joint Registry and Surgical Site Infection Improvement Programme

BackgroundThis study aimed to identify the risk factors, in particular the use of surgical helmet systems (SHSs), for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Data recorded by the New Zealand Surgical Site Infection Improvement Programme (SSIIP) and the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) were combined and analyzed.MethodsPrimary TKA procedures performed between July 2013 and June 2018 that were recorded by both the SSIIP and NZJR were analyzed. Two primary outcomes were measured: (1) PJI within 90 days as recorded by the SSIIP and (2) revision TKA for deep infection within 6 months as recorded by the NZJR. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for both outcomes with results considered significant at P < .05.ResultsA total of 19,322 primary TKAs were recorded by both databases in which 97 patients had a PJI within 90 days as recorded by the SSIIP (0.50%), and 90 patients had a revision TKA for deep infection within 6 months (0.47%) as recorded by the NZJR. An SHS was associated with a lower rate of PJI (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.50, P = .008) and revision for deep infection (adjusted OR = 0.55, P = .022) than conventional gowning. Male sex (adjusted OR = 2.6, P < .001) and an American Society of Anesthesiologists score >2 were patient risk factors for infection (OR = 2.63, P < .001 for PJI and OR = 1.75, P = .017 for revision for deep infection).ConclusionUsing contemporary data from the SSIIP and NZJR, the use of the SHS was associated with a lower rate of PJI after primary TKA than conventional surgical gowning. Male sex and a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score continue to be risk factors for infection.     

The Importance of Oral History: Does Dental Implant Placement or Caries One Year Before or After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Increase Medical Complications and Periprosthetic Joint Infections?

BackgroundConsensus regarding prior dental problems on the outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients is lacking. Therefore, our objectives were to determine the association of dental caries or dental implant placement in TKA patients on the following: (1) medical complications; (2) health care utilization (lengths of stay and readmissions); (3) implant-related complications; and (4) expenditures.MethodsA retrospective query was performed using an administrative claims database for 3 patient cohorts undergoing primary TKA from 2010 to 2020. Patients who had a history of dental caries or implant placement 1 year prior to TKA (n = 1,466) and 1 year after TKA (n = 1,127) were case-matched to patients who did not have a dental history by age and comorbidities. Outcomes included 90-day complications, health care utilization parameters, 2-year implant complications, and expenditures. Logistic regression models computed odds ratios (OR) of complications and readmissions. P values less than 0.005 were significant.ResultsPatients who had a dental implant placement prior to TKA had higher frequency of complications (20.05 versus 14.01%; OR: 1.53, P < .0001), including myocardial infarctions (2.52 versus 1.23%; OR: 2.08, P = .0002) and pneumonia (2.52 versus 1.24%; OR: 2.06, P = .0002). Lengths of stay (3.28 versus 2.98 days; P = .255), readmission rates (4.71 versus 4.28%; P = .470), and implant-related complications including periprosthetic joint infections (3.14 versus 2.63%; OR: 1.20, P = .279) were similar between patients lacking dental history. Expenditures were higher in patients who had a postoperative and preoperative dental history ($19,252 versus $19,363 versus 17,980; P < .001).ConclusionDental caries or implant placement may reflect overall worse medical condition resulting in more complications and higher costs after TKA. Dental history screening preoperatively may assist arthroplasty surgeons in minimizing complications.     

Irrigation,Débridement,and Implant Retention for Recurrence of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Two-Stage Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Study

BackgroundWe investigated clinical/functional outcomes and implant survivorship in patients who underwent 2-stage revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), experienced acute PJI recurrence, and underwent irrigation, débridement, and polyethylene exchange (IDPE) with retention of stable implant.MethodsTwenty-four patients (24 knees) were identified who underwent 2-stage revision TKA for PJI, experienced acute PJI recurrence, and then underwent IDPE between 2005 and 2016 (minimum 2-year follow-up). After IDPE, intravenous antibiotics (6 weeks) and oral suppression therapy (minimum 6 months) were administered. Data were compared with 1:2 matched control group that underwent 2-stage revision TKA for chronic PJI and did not receive IDPE.ResultsAverage IDPE group follow-up was 3.8 years (range, 2.4-7.2). Reinfection rate after IDPE was 29% (n = 7): 3 of 7 underwent second IDPE (2 of 3 had no infection recurrence) and 5 (one was patient who had recurrent infection after second IDPE) underwent another 2-stage revision TKA. Control group reinfection rate was 27% (n = 13) (P = .85). For IDPE group, mean time to reinfection after 2-stage revision TKA was 4.6 months (range, 1-8 months) (patients presented with acute symptoms less than 3 weeks duration). At latest follow-up, mean Knee Society Score was 70 (range, 35-85) in IDPE group and 75 (range, 30-85) in control group (P = .53).ConclusionIDPE for acute reinfection following 2-stage revision TKA with well-fixed implants had a 71% success rate. These patients had comparable functional outcome as patients with no IDPE after 2-stage revision TKA. IDPE followed by long-term suppression antibiotic therapy should be considered in patients with acute infection and stable components.     

Effective Treatment of Single-Stage Revision Using Intra-Articular Antibiotic Infusion for Polymicrobial Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BackgroundThe treatment of polymicrobial periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) confronted distinct challenges. No reports have assessed the efficacy of local antibiotic delivery combined with 1-stage exchange in polymicrobial PJI.MethodsBetween January 2013 and December 2018, we retrospectively analyzed the data of 126 patients, including 19 polymicrobial PJIs and 107 monomicrobial PJIs, who underwent single-stage revision using intra-articular antibiotic infusion. The risk factors, microbiology, infection control rate, and clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 groups.ResultsHigher body mass index, presence of a sinus tract, and prior revisions were the risk factors for polymicrobial PJI. Isolation of Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, and Gram-negative pathogens was highly associated with polymicrobial PJI. Of the 19 polymicrobial PJIs, only 2 patients occurred infection recurrence, which is similar with the result of 6 of 107 patients in the monomicrobial PJI (P = .225). The Harris Hip Score of the polymicrobial group showed no difference from that of the monomicrobial group (78 vs 80; P = .181). Nevertheless, the polymicrobial group exhibited inferior Hospital for Special Surgery knee score relative to the monomicrobial group (77 vs 79; P = .017).ConclusionWith rational and targeted use of antibiotics, single-stage revision can effectively control polymicrobial infections, and achieve favorable outcomes similar to that in monomicrobial patients. However, this regimen is still needed to be further confirmed, especially in the infections with different microbial species simultaneously. Additionally, obese patients with a sinus tract and those who had prior revisions had a greater risk of polymicrobial PJI.     

High Mortality After Total Knee Arthroplasty Periprosthetic Joint Infection is Related to Preoperative Morbidity and the Disease Process but Not Treatment

BackgroundPeriprosthetic joint infection (PJI) mortality rate is approximately 20%. The etiology for high mortality remains unknown. The objective of this study was to determine whether mortality was associated with preoperative morbidity (frailty), sequalae of treatment, or the PJI disease process itself.MethodsA multicenter observational study was completed comparing 184 patients treated with septic revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to a control group of 38 patients treated with aseptic revision TKA. Primary outcomes included time and the cause of death. Secondary outcomes included preoperative comorbidities and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCMI) measured preoperatively and at various postoperative timepoints.ResultsThe septic revision TKA cohort experienced earlier mortality compared to the aseptic cohort, with a higher mortality rate at 90 days, 1, 2, and 3 years after index revision surgery (P = .01). There was no significant difference for any single cause of death (P > .05 for each). The mean preoperative CCMI was higher (P = .005) in the septic revision TKA cohort. Both septic and aseptic cohorts experienced a significant increase in CCMI from the preoperative to 3 years postoperative (P < .0001 and P = .002) and time of death (P < .0001 both) timepoints. The septic revision TKA cohort had a higher CCMI 3 years postoperatively (P = .001) and at time of death (P = .046), but not one year postoperatively (P = .119).ConclusionCompared to mortality from aseptic revision surgery, septic revision TKA is associated with earlier mortality, but there is no single specific etiology. As quantified by changes in CCMI, PJI mortality was associated with both frailty and the PJI disease process, but not treatment.     

Does Metabolic Syndrome Impact the Risk of Reoperation,Revision, or Complication After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BackgroundMetabolic syndrome (MetS) is an increasingly frequent condition characterized by insulin resistance, abdominal obesity, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. This study evaluated implant survivorship, complications, and clinical outcomes of primary TKAs performed in patients who have MetS.MethodsUtilizing our institutional total joint registry, 2,063 primary TKAs were performed in patients with a diagnosis of MetS according to the World Health Organization criteria. MetS patients were matched 1:1 based on age, sex, and surgical year to those who did not have the condition. The World Health Organization’s body mass index (BMI) classification was utilized to evaluate the effect of obesity within MetS patients. Kaplan–Meier methods were utilized to determine implant survivorship. Clinical outcomes were assessed with Knee Society scores. The mean follow-up was 5 years.ResultsMetS and non-MetS patients did not have significant differences in 5-year implant survivorship free from any reoperation (P = .7), any revision (P = .2), and reoperation for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI; P = .2). When stratifying, patients with MetS and BMI >40 had significantly decreased 5-year survivorship free from any revision (95 versus 98%, respectively; hazard ratio = 2.1, P = .005) and reoperation for PJI (97 versus 99%, respectively; hazard ratio = 2.2, P = .02). Both MetS and non-MetS groups experienced significant improvements in Knee Society Scores (77 versus 78, respectively; P < .001) that were not significantly different (P = .3).ConclusionMetS did not significantly increase the risk of any reoperation after TKA; however, MetS patients with BMI >40 had a two-fold risk of any revision and reoperation for PJI. These results suggest that obesity is an important condition within MetS criteria and remains an independent risk factor.Level of EvidenceLevel 3, Case-control study.