Minimum 5-Year Outcomes of a Multicenter,Prospective, Randomized Control Trial Assessing Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Patient-Specific Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundPatient-specific instrumentation (PSI) was developed to produce more accurate alignment of components and consequently improve clinical outcomes when used in total knee arthroplasty. We compare radiological accuracy and clinical outcomes at a minimum of 5-year follow-up between patients randomized to undergo total knee arthroplasty performed using PSI or traditional cutting block techniques.MethodsThis multicenter, randomized control trial included patients blinded to the technique 1used. Outcome measures were coronal alignment measured radiologically, Euroqol-5D, Oxford knee score, and International Knee Society Score measured at 1- and 5-year follow-up.ResultsAt a minimum 5-year follow-up, there were 38 knees in the PSI group and 39 in the conventional instrumentation group for analysis. Baseline demographics and clinical outcome scores were matched between groups. Overall, there was no significant difference in the coronal femoral angle (P = .59), coronal tibial angle (P = .37), tibiofemoral angle (P = .99), sagittal femoral angle (P = .34), or the posterior tibia slope (P = .12) between knees implanted using PSI and those implanted with traditional cutting blocks. On the measurement of coronal alignment, intraobserver reliability tests demonstrated substantial agreement (k = 0.64). Clinical outcomes at both 1-year and 5-year follow-up demonstrated statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement in scores from baseline in both groups, but no difference could be detected between the Euroqol-5D (P = .78), Oxford knee score (P = .24), or International Knee Society Score (P = .86) between the 2 groups.ConclusionThis study has shown no additional benefit to PSI in terms of improved alignment or functional outcomes at minimum 5-year follow-up over traditional techniques.     

Mild Valgus Alignment After Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Led to Lower Functional Results and Survivorship at Mean 8-Year Follow-Up

BackgroundIn medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), the best results and the highest survivorship are found by mild undercorrection of varus deformities. In lateral UKA, the desirable amount of valgus undercorrection has not yet been determined. The purposes of this study were to present the results of a consecutive series of lateral UKAs and to investigate the effect of postoperative limb alignment on them.MethodsA total of 161 lateral UKA were reviewed. Outcomes studied included range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Score (KSS), University of California Los Angeles Activity Score, Tegner Activity Scale, Forgotten Joint Score, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, and survivorship. Patients were divided into two groups according to postoperative alignment: group A (hip-knee-ankle ≥184°, 79 UKA) and group B (hip-knee-ankle <184°, 82 UKA).ResultsAt a mean follow-up of 8 years (range, 2-18), ROM (P < .01); KSS-C (P < .01); KSS-F (P < .01); VAS (P < .01) improved from baseline. No differences were noted in postoperative ROM, VAS, University of California Los Angeles, Tegner Activity Scale, and Forgotten Joint Score between groups. Group A showed higher postoperative clinical and functional KSS (P < .01) and higher survivorship (96.2 versus 91.5%, P = .01) than group B.ConclusionMild valgus alignment (3° or less) after lateral UKA is linked to lower clinical and functional scores and lower survivorship compared to moderate valgus (over 4°) at mean 8-year follow-up. More undercorrection of the coronal deformity in lateral UKA compared to medial UKA is desirable to get the best results.     

Preoperative Pain Catastrophizing Prior to Total Knee Arthroplasty is Associated With Worse Preoperative Symptoms and More Clinical Improvement: A Prospective Comparative Study

BackgroundTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a reliable procedure for end-stage osteoarthritis with excellent long-term survivorship, but approximately 15% of patients are not satisfied. Pain catastrophizing (PC) has been proposed as a potential cause but current evidence is limited to smaller studies with short-term follow-up. Our goal was to assess outcomes following TKA in a large cohort with and without PC.MethodsA prospective comparative study was performed with patients undergoing unilateral primary TKA between 2019 and 2021 with 2-year follow-up. All patients completed a PC Scale questionnaire preoperatively and a score of minimum 30 was considered PC. Outcomes consisted of Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Shortform (KOOS-PS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), numeric rating scale Pain, and aseptic revisions. Ultimately, 301 patients were included (mean age 69 years [range, 30-92 years], with 60.8% women). Forty four patients (14.6%) had PC.ResultsPreoperatively, PC patients had inferior KOOS-PS, inferior OKS, and more pain than non-PC patients (all P < .001). PC patients had more improvement from preoperatively to 6 months postoperatively for KOOS-PS, OKS, and pain (all P < .05) and to 12 months for KOOS-PS and OKS (both P < .005). Similarly, PC patients had more improvement from preoperative to 24 months for OKS (P = .003). At 24 months, however, PC patients reported more pain than non-PC patients. There was no difference in revision rates (P = .192).ConclusionPatients who had PC reported worse function and pain preoperatively but had more improvement to 6 months and 12 months postoperatively. At 24 months, similar subjective function was noted, although PC patients reported more pain.     

Comparison of Posterior Cruciate-Retaining and High-Flexion Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Design

BackgroundHigh-flexion prostheses have been developed to achieve deep flexion after total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to compare standard NexGen (CR, cruciate-retaining) and high-flexion NexGen (CR-flex) total knee prostheses in terms of range of motion, clinical and radiologic outcomes, rates of complications, and survivorship in long-term follow-up.MethodsFrom January 2000 to December 2008, 423 consecutive knees underwent total knee arthroplasty using standard CR or CR-flex prostheses. Fifty-three patients were lost to follow-up or declined to participate and 54 died, leaving 290 knees. The minimum duration of follow-up was 8 years (mean 10.1 years). Physical examination and knee scoring of patients were assessed preoperatively, at 6 months and 1 year after surgery, and annually thereafter. Supine anteroposterior and lateral radiographs and standing anteroposterior hip-to-ankle radiographs were obtained preoperatively and at each follow-up.ResultsMean postoperative range of motions in the standard CR group and the CR-flex group were similar, showing no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .853). At the time of the final follow-up, mean total Hospital for Special Surgery scores were similar between the 2 groups (P = .118). Mean Knee Society pain (P = .325) and function scores (P = .659) were also comparable between the 2 groups. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score showed no intergroup difference either (P = .586). The mean hip-knee-ankle angle at the final follow-up was approximately the same (P = .940). Mean coronal angles of femoral and tibial component at final follow-up were also similar (P = .211 and P = .764, respectively). The prevalence of the radiolucent line was 0.6% in the standard CR group and 0.9% in the CR-flex group. Estimated survival rate according to Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was 97.2% in the standard CR group and 95.6% in the CR-flex group at mean follow-up of 10.1 years.ConclusionThis study suggests that excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes could be achieved with both standard and high-flexion CR total knee designs. High-flexion CR prosthesis did not show any advantages over the standard design.     

Computer-Assisted Kinematic and Mechanical Axis Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Bilateral Simultaneous Surgery

BackgroundRandomized controlled trials of kinematic alignment (KA) and mechanical alignment (MA) in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have to date demonstrated at least equivalence of KA in terms of clinical outcomes. No trial of bilateral TKA has been conducted so patient preference for one technique over the other is unknown.MethodsForty-one participants underwent computer-assisted bilateral TKA. The outcome measures were as follows: (1) joint range of motion and functional scores including the KOOS, the KOOS JR, Oxford Knee Score, and the Forgotten Joint Score at a minimum of 2 years; (2) preference and perception of limb symmetry; (3) intraoperative alignment data; (4) release and gap balance data; and (5) postoperative radiographic joint angles.ResultsThere were no significant differences with respect to flexion range (P = .970) or functional scores (mean KOOS, P = .941; KOOS JR, P = .685; Oxford Knee Score, P = .578; FJS, P = .542). Significantly more participants who favored one knee preferred their KA TKA (P = .03); however, half of the patients had no preference and the overall numbers were small. Only 3 participants perceived any limb asymmetry (P < .001). More releases were required in the MA group (P = .018). Standing hip-knee-ankle angle means and frequency distributions were similar (P = .097 and P = .097, respectively).ConclusionClinical outcomes were equivalent at 2 years. Significantly more participants preferred their KA joint. Fewer releases were required using a KA technique. Participants were visually insensitive to modest hip-knee-ankle angle asymmetry.Level of EvidenceLevel 1.     

Higher Activity Level Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Not Deleterious to Mid-Term Implant Survivorship

BackgroundThe impact of a patient’s activity level following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial, with some surgeons concerned about increased polyethylene wear, aseptic loosening, and revisions. The purpose of this study is to report on implant survivorship and outcomes of high activity patients compared to low activity patients after TKA.MethodsA retrospective review identified 1611 patients (2038 knees) that underwent TKA with 5-year minimum follow-up. Patients were divided in 2 groups based on their University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity level: low activity (LA) (UCLA ≤5) and high activity (HA) (UCLA ≥6). Outcomes included range of motion, Knee Society scores, complications, and reoperations. Parametric survival analysis was performed to evaluate the significance of activity level on survivorship while controlling for age, gender, preoperative pain, Knee Society clinical scores, Knee Society functional scores, and body mass index (BMI).ResultsMean follow-up was 11.4 years (range 5.1-15.9). The LA group had significantly more female patients, were older, had higher BMI, and had lower functional scores preoperatively (all with P < .001). The HA group had significantly higher improvements in Knee Society scores (P < .001) and pain postoperatively (P < .001). Revisions were performed in 4% of the LA group and 1.7% knees of the HA group (P = .003). After controlling for age, gender, preoperative pain, Knee Society clinical scores, Knee Society functional scores, and BMI, a higher postoperative activity level remained a significant factor for improved survivorship with an odds ratio of 2.4 (95% confidence interval 1.2-4.7, P = .011). The all-cause 12-year survivorship was 98% for the HA group and 95.3% for the LA group (P = .003). The aseptic 12-year survivorship was 98.4% for the HA group and 96.3% for the LA group (P = .02).ConclusionHighly active patients had increased survivorship at 5-year minimum follow-up compared to lower activity patients after TKA. Patient activity level after TKA may not need to be limited with modern implants.     

Effect of Total Knee Arthroplasty on Coronal Alignment of the Ankle Joint

BackgroundThe effect of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on the ankle joint is not entirely clear. The purpose of this study is to assess postoperative changes in the coronal alignment of the ankle joint in patients undergoing TKA for various degrees of knee deformity.MethodsThis retrospective study included 107 patients who had undergone TKA for primary osteoarthritis. In all cases, preoperative coronal alignment deformity of the knee was corrected in an attempt to restore the native mechanical axis of the knee. Patients were stratified into 3 groups according to the degree of knee coronal alignment correction achieved intraoperatively: group 1 (<10° varus/valgus correction, n = 60), group 2 (≥10° varus correction, n = 30), and group 3 (≥10° valgus correction, n = 17). Knee/ankle alignment angles were measured on full-length, standing anteroposterior imaging preoperatively and postoperatively and included the following: hip-knee-ankle angle, tibial plafond inclination (TPI), talar inclination (TI), and tibiotalar tilt angle.ResultsSignificant changes in ankle alignment, specifically with regard to TPI (9.5° ± 6.9°, P < .01) and TI (8.8° ± 8.8°, P = .03) were noted in the ≥10° valgus correction group compared to the other 2 groups. Regardless of the degree of knee deformity correction, TKA did not lead to significant changes in the tibiotalar tilt angle.ConclusionA correction of ≥10° in a genu valgum deformity can affect ankle joint alignment, leading to alterations in TPI and TI. These findings need to be taken into consideration in assessing candidates for TKA as a possible cause of postoperative ankle pain.     

Alignment in Medial Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: The Limb Has a Leg Up on the Component

BackgroundTo assess how implant alignment affects unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) outcome, we compared tibial component alignment of well-functioning UKAs against 2 groups of failed UKAs, revised for progression of lateral compartment arthritis (“Progression”) and aseptic loosening (“Loosening”).MethodsWe identified 37 revisions for Progression and 61 revisions for Loosening from our prospective institutional database of 3351 medial fixed-bearing UKAs performed since 2000. Revision cohorts were matched on age, gender, body mass index, and postoperative range of motion with “Successful” unrevised UKAs with minimum 10-year follow-up and Knee Society Score ≥70. Tibial component coronal (TCA) and sagittal (TSA) plane alignment was measured on postoperative radiographs. Limb alignment was quantified by hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle on long-leg radiographs. In addition to directly comparing groups, a multivariate logistic regression examined how limb and component alignments were associated with UKA revision.ResultsIn the Progression group, component alignment was similar to the matched successes (TCA 3.6° ± 3.5° varus vs 5.1° ± 3.5° varus, P = .07; TSA 8.4° ± 4.4° vs 8.8° ± 3.6°, P = .67), whereas HKA angle was significantly more valgus (0.3° ± 3.6° valgus vs 4.4° ± 2.6° varus, P < .001). Loosening group component alignment was also similar to the matched successes (TCA 6.1° ± 3.7° varus vs 5.9° ± 3.1° varus, P = .72; TSA 8.4° ± 4.6° vs 8.1° ± 3.9°, P = .68), and HKA was significantly more varus (6.1° ± 3.1° varus vs 4.0° ± 2.7° varus, P < .001). Using a multivariate logistic regression, HKA angle was the most significant factor associated with revision (P < .001).ConclusionIn this population of revised UKAs and long-term successes, limb alignment was a more important determinant of outcome than tibial component alignment.Level of EvidenceLevel III case-control study.     

Does Metabolic Syndrome Impact the Risk of Reoperation,Revision, or Complication After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BackgroundMetabolic syndrome (MetS) is an increasingly frequent condition characterized by insulin resistance, abdominal obesity, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. This study evaluated implant survivorship, complications, and clinical outcomes of primary TKAs performed in patients who have MetS.MethodsUtilizing our institutional total joint registry, 2,063 primary TKAs were performed in patients with a diagnosis of MetS according to the World Health Organization criteria. MetS patients were matched 1:1 based on age, sex, and surgical year to those who did not have the condition. The World Health Organization’s body mass index (BMI) classification was utilized to evaluate the effect of obesity within MetS patients. Kaplan–Meier methods were utilized to determine implant survivorship. Clinical outcomes were assessed with Knee Society scores. The mean follow-up was 5 years.ResultsMetS and non-MetS patients did not have significant differences in 5-year implant survivorship free from any reoperation (P = .7), any revision (P = .2), and reoperation for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI; P = .2). When stratifying, patients with MetS and BMI >40 had significantly decreased 5-year survivorship free from any revision (95 versus 98%, respectively; hazard ratio = 2.1, P = .005) and reoperation for PJI (97 versus 99%, respectively; hazard ratio = 2.2, P = .02). Both MetS and non-MetS groups experienced significant improvements in Knee Society Scores (77 versus 78, respectively; P < .001) that were not significantly different (P = .3).ConclusionMetS did not significantly increase the risk of any reoperation after TKA; however, MetS patients with BMI >40 had a two-fold risk of any revision and reoperation for PJI. These results suggest that obesity is an important condition within MetS criteria and remains an independent risk factor.Level of EvidenceLevel 3, Case-control study.     

What are the Outcomes After Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Prior Cerebrovascular Accidents?

BackgroundFor patients who have a history of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) with neurological sequelae undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), we sought to determine mortality rate, implant survivorship, complications, and clinical outcomes.MethodsOur total joint registry identified CVA sequelae patients undergoing primary THA (n = 42 with 25 on affected hip) and TKA (n = 56 with 34 on affected knee). Patients were 1:2 matched based upon age, sex, body mass index, and surgical year to a non-CVA cohort. Mortality and implant survivorship were evaluated via Kaplan-Meier methods. Clinical outcomes were assessed via Harris Hip scores or Knee Society scores . Mean follow-up was 5 years (range, 2-12).ResultsFor CVA sequelae and non-CVA patients, respectively, the 5-year patient survivorship was 69 versus 89% after THA (HR = 2.5; P = .006) and 56 versus 90% after TKA (HR = 2.4, P = .003). No significant difference was noted between groups in implant survivorship free from any reoperation after THA (P > .2) and TKA (P > .6). Postoperative CVA occurred at an equal rate in CVA sequelae and non-CVA patients after TKA (1.8%); none after THA in either group. The magnitude of change in Harris Hip scores (P = .7) and Knee Society scores (P = .7) were similar for CVA sequelae and non-CVA patients.ConclusionComplications, including the risk of postoperative CVA, implant survivorship, and outcome score improvement are similar for CVA sequelae and non-CVA patients. A 2.5-fold increased risk of death at a mean of 5 years after primary THA or TKA exist for CVA sequelae patients.     

Long-Term (Up to 27 Years) Prospective,Randomized Study of Mobile-Bearing and Fixed-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasties in Patients <60 Years of Age With Osteoarthritis

BackgroundOur study determined long-term (up to 27 years) results of fixed-bearing vs mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) in patients <60 years with osteoarthritis.MethodsThis study included 291 patients (582 knees; mean age 58 ± 5 years), who received a mobile-bearing TKA in one knee and a fixed-bearing TKA in the other. The mean duration of follow-up was 26.3 y (range 24-27).ResultsAt the latest follow-up, the mean Knee Society knee scores (91 ± 9 vs 89 ± 11 points, P = .383), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (35 ± 7 vs 37 ± 6 points, P = .165), range of knee motion (128° ± 13° vs 125° ± 15°, P = .898), and University of California, Los Angeles activity score (6 ± 4 vs 6 ± 4 points, P = 1.000) were below the level of clinical significance between the 2 groups. Revision of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing TKA occurred in 16 (5.5%) and 20 knees (6.9%), respectively. The rate of survival at 27 years for mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing TKA was 94.5% (95% confidence interval 89-100) and 93.1% (95% confidence interval 88-98), respectively, and no significant differences were observed between the groups. Osteolysis was identified in 4 knees (1.4%) in each group.ConclusionThere were no significant differences in functional outcomes, rate of loosening, osteolysis, or survivorship between the 2 groups.     

Long-Term Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life at Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up After Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and Total Knee Arthroplasty for Isolated Medial Compartment Osteoarthritis

BackgroundThe aim of this study is to compare the long-term functional outcome and quality of life between total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for the treatment of isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis.MethodsBetween 2000 and 2008, a total of 218 patients underwent primary UKA at our tertiary hospital. A TKA group was matched through 1:1 propensity score matching and adjusted for age, gender, body mass index, preoperative knee flexion, and function scores. All patients had medial compartment osteoarthritis. The patients were assessed with the range of motion, Knee Society Knee Score and Knee Society Function Score, Oxford Knee Score, Short Form-36 physical component score (PCS) and mental component score preoperatively, at 6 months, 2 years, and 10 years. Patients’ satisfaction, expectation fulfillment, and minimal clinically important difference were analyzed.ResultsThere were no differences in baseline characteristics between groups after propensity score matching (P > .05). UKA had greater knee flexion at all time points. Although the Knee Society Function Score was superior in UKA by 5.5, 3, and 4.3 points at 6 months, 2 years, and 10 years, respectively (P < .001), these differences did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference (Knee Society Knee Score 6.1). There were no significant differences in the Oxford Knee Score and Short Form-36 physical component score/mental component score. At 10 years, similar proportions of UKA and TKA were satisfied (90.8% vs 89.9%, P = .44) and had expectation fulfillment (89.4% vs 88.5%, P = .46). Between 2 and 10 years, all function scores deteriorated significantly for both groups (P < .01).ConclusionUKA and TKA are excellent treatment modalities for isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis, with similar functional outcomes, quality of life, and satisfaction at 10 years.     

Midterm Outcomes and Survivorship of Anterior Stabilized Versus Cruciate Retaining Bearing in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundThere has been increasing utilization of ultracongruent bearings with a cruciate retaining (CR) femoral component in primary total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes and survivorship between an ultracongruent anterior stabilized (AS) and CR bearing.MethodsA retrospective review was performed from 2010 through 2014 of all primary total knee arthroplasties with a single knee systems identical CR femur and AS or CR bearing with minimum 2-year follow-up yielding a study cohort of 3323 patients (4164 knees). Knee range of motion, Knee Society pain scores, Knee Society clinical scores, Knee Society functional scores, and University of California Los Angeles activity scores were evaluated. The need for manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), nonrevision surgery and revisions were assessed.ResultsAS bearing was used in 1471 knees (35%) and CR bearing used in 2693 knees (65%). Mean follow-up was 5.4 years. The AS group had significantly higher improvements in knee range of motion, Knee Society clinical, Knee Society functional, and Knee Society pain scores. MUAs were performed on 120 knees (8.2%) in the AS group compared with 158 knees (5.9%) in the CR group (P = .005). The AS group had significantly less all-cause failure, aseptic failures, revisions for instability, and revisions for isolated polyethylene wear. The 10-year aseptic survival for AS was 98.3% and for 92.3% for the CR group (P = .002).ConclusionThese mid-term results demonstrate the AS bearing had significantly higher improvements in clinical and functional outcomes as well as greater survivorship. Knees in which an AS bearing was used did have a higher incidence of MUA.     

Total Knee Arthroplasty After Intramedullary Tibial Nail: A Matched Cohort Study

BackgroundAs the use of intramedullary nails (IMNs) has become more common, there are an increasing number of patients requiring total knee arthroplasty (TKA) who have an indwelling tibial IMN. The purpose of this study is to compare implant survivorship, clinical outcomes, and complications in patients undergoing primary TKA with a history of tibial IMN to those without.MethodsWe retrospectively identified 24 TKAs performed between 2000 and 2017 after ipsilateral tibial IMN. Patients were matched 1:2 to patients undergoing primary TKA without history of tibial IMN based upon age, gender, body mass index, and year of surgery. Mean follow-up was 7 years.ResultsThe 10-year survivorship free of any revision was 100% for the tibial IMN cohort, and 96% for the control cohort, while the 10-year survivorship free of any reoperation was 91% and 89%, respectively (P = .72). Patients with a history of tibial IMN had similar Knee Society Scores to matched controls at 2 years (P = .77) and 5 years (P = .09). Acquired idiopathic stiffness trended toward being more common (17% vs 6%, P = .21) and operative time trended toward being longer (135 vs 118 min, P = .07) when the tibial IMN was removed, but there was no overall difference in complication rate between cohorts.ConclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first report of primary TKA in patients with a history of ipsilateral tibial IMN. Compared to a matched cohort of patients without tibial IMN, these patients have similar outcomes in regards to implant survivorship, clinical outcomes, and risk of complications.Level of EvidenceTherapeutic Level III.     

The Impact of Coronal Alignment on Revision in Medial Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundTo better define the optimal alignment target for medial fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), this study compares the postoperative mechanical alignment of well-functioning UKAs against 2 groups of failed UKAs, including revisions for progression of lateral compartment osteoarthritis (“Progression”) and revisions for aseptic loosening or subsidence (“Loosening”).MethodsFrom our prospective institutional database of 3351 medial fixed-bearing UKAs performed since 2000, we identified 37 UKAs revised for Progression and 61 UKAs revised for Loosening. Each of these revision cohorts was matched based on age at surgery, gender, body mass index, and postoperative range of motion with unrevised UKAs that had at least 10 years of follow-up and a Knee Society Score of 70 or greater without subtracting points for alignment (“Success” groups). Postoperative alignment was quantified by the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle measured on long-leg alignment radiographs.ResultsThe mean HKA angle at 4-month follow-up for the Progression group was 0.3° ± 3.6° of valgus compared to 4.4° ± 2.6° of varus for the matched Success group (P < 0.001). For the Loosening group, the mean HKA angle was 6.1° ± 3.1° of varus versus 4.0° ± 2.7° of varus for the matched Success group (P < 0.001).ConclusionsPatients with well-functioning UKAs at 10 years exhibited mild varus mechanical alignment of approximately 4°, whereas patients revised for progression of osteoarthritis averaged more valgus and those revised for loosening or subsidence averaged more varus. The optimal mechanical alignment for medial fixed-bearing UKA survival with contemporary polyethylene is likely slight varus.     

Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Medial Stabilized Versus Non–Medial Stabilized Prostheses in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BackgroundThe aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of medial stabilized total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with non–medial stabilized TKAs.MethodsA systematic search of multiple databases was conducted in October 2019. A meta-analysis was conducted for the Knee Society Score (KSS), Knee Society Functional Score (KFS), range of motion (ROM), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS).ResultsA total of 857 articles yielded 21 studies eligible for inclusion with 13 studies used for quantitative analysis. The meta-analysis revealed that the medial stabilized group had a mean FJS that was 13.8 points higher than that of the non–medial stabilized TKA (mean difference [MD]: 13.83, P ≤ .0001, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.90-18.76, I² = 0%) which was less than the minimal clinically important difference of 14. The medial stabilized group also demonstrated a statistically significant difference in the postoperative ROM (MD = 2.52, P = .05, 95% CI: ?0.03 to 5.07, I² = 85%) and OKS when compared with the non–medial stabilized group (MD = 1.25, P = .02, 95% CI: 0.17-2.33, I² = 27%), but these were not clinically significant. There was no statistically or clinically significant difference in the KSS, KFS, and WOMAC scores.ConclusionMedial stabilized knee prostheses demonstrated no clinically significant differences for the ROM, OKS, WOMAC, KSS, and KFS. The FJS demonstrated the greatest MD and warrants further investigation. Future research is required using patient-reported outcome measures with a lower ceiling effect such as the FJS.     

Mild Coronal Stem Malalignment Does Not Negatively Impact Survivorship or Clinical Results in Uncemented Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties With Dual-Tapered Implants

BackgroundProper component positioning in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is crucial for implant fixation and hip stability. The purpose of this study is to assess if neutral coronal stem alignment (0° ± 3°) improved long-term survivorship in uncemented femoral components.MethodsBetween 2005 and 2010, 1028 primary THAs were performed with 2 contemporary dual-tapered, proximally coated uncemented stem types. Alignment was measured immediately postoperatively and at most recent follow-up. In total, 978 femoral stems (95%) were within 0° ± 3° of the neutral anatomic coronal axis, and the 50 stems (5%) outside that range were considered outliers (3.1° of valgus to 4.8° of varus). Outcomes analyzed included implant survivorship, Harris Hip Scores, and incidence of dislocation. Mean follow-up was 5 years.ResultsSurvivorship free of aseptic femoral component loosening was 99.3% and 98.2% at 5 and 8 years in the neutral group vs 100% at 5 and 8 years in the outlier group (P = .98). Survivorship free of femoral component revision for any reason was 99.1% and 97.3% at 5 and 8 years vs 100% at 5 and 8 years, respectively (P = .80). Harris Hip Scores were similar (89 in both groups; P = .84) at most recent follow-up. The incidence of mild to moderate thigh pain was also similar in both groups (6.1% vs 6%, P = .85). The incidence of dislocation was 1.5% at 8 years, and similar between both groups (P = .77).ConclusionSlight malalignment of contemporary dual-tapered uncemented THA femoral components does not appear to negatively impact survivorship or clinical outcomes, which is in contrast to cemented femoral components.Level of evidence IIICase-control study.     

Ten-year results for a single-surgeon series of Scorpio non-restrictive geometry (NRG) posterior stabilised (PS) total knee replacement

Background

To report the long-term results for a single-surgeon consecutive series of Scorpio non-restrictive geometry (NRG) posterior stabilised (PS) total knee replacement (TKR).

Materials and methods

Forty-six consecutive patients who underwent 53 Scorpio NRG PS were identified. Change in range of motion (ROM) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) over time were recorded. Radiographs were evaluated for alignment and radiolucent lines. Survival analysis for the prosthesis was calculated.

Results

At a mean of 10.1 years (range 9.1–10.9) following exclusions thirty-seven (69.8%) knees in thirty-one (67.4%) patients (6 bilateral) were available for review. None of the patients required revision surgery. Mean OKS score at 10 years was 37.8. The mean ROM significantly improved from 95° pre-operative to 117.5° at 5 years and 115° at 10 years (p = < 0.001). This equates to a value-added range of motion (VAROM) of 19° at 5 years and 15.6° at 10 years. There was a correlation between OKS and VAROM at 5 and 10 years. Radiological assessment did not reveal any evidence of progressive cement radiolucent lines nor component migration.

Conclusion

In this series the Scorpio NRG PS showed 100% 10-year survivorship. We found a significant improvement in ROM and VAROM over time. This was not associated with increased signs of loosening.

     

Does Unicompartmental Knee Replacement Offer Improved Clinical Advantages Over Total Knee Replacement in the Treatment of Isolated Lateral Osteoarthritis? A Matched Cohort Analysis From an Independent Center

BackgroundThe purpose of this study is to compare the functional and radiographic results, perioperative complications, satisfaction rate, and mid-term survivorship after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for the treatment of lateral compartmental knee osteoarthritis (LCKO).MethodsBetween March 2007 and September 2017, we identified 35 patients with primary TKAs and 121 patients with lateral UKAs (LUKAs) for LCKO with a minimum follow-up of 2 years (mean 5.3 years, range 2-12.4). The matched variables were age, gender, operation side, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologist grade, initial diagnosis, osteoarthritis grade in lateral compartment, and follow-up time. All patients were assessed using the Oxford Knee Score, Hospital for Special Surgery score, range of motion, length of hospital stay, satisfaction, and complications. Survivorship of UKA and TKA implants was also compared.ResultsAt last follow-up, LUKA had a significantly better postoperative Oxford Knee Score, Hospital for Special Surgery score, range of motion, shorter length of hospital time, and higher satisfaction rate than matched TKA group. There were significant differences regarding patellar tendon injury (P = .043), superficial wound infection (P = .028), patellar snapping or impingement (P = .047), and stiffness (P < .001). Five-year survivorships free from revision were similar in both groups (99.2% vs 97.1%, P = .347).ConclusionLUKA for LCKO demonstrated more favorable 5-year results in comparison with TKA. Furthermore, LUKA achieved comparable mid-term survivorship and was less likely to suffer from wound infection and knee stiffness, although not overall surgical complications.     

Foot Pain is Common,But Frequently Improves 1 Year After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundOsteoarthritis frequently affects multiple joints through the lower limbs. This study sought to examine the incidence of foot pain in subjects undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and determine if foot symptoms improved following surgery.MethodsSix hundred ten subjects undergoing TKA completed patient-reported outcome measures preoperatively, and at 6 and/or 12 months after surgery including the incidence and severity of foot or ankle pain, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) Joint Replacement, Oxford Knee Scores (OKS), EQ5D, and satisfaction.ResultsFoot or ankle pain was reported in 45% before, 32% at 6 months, and 36% at 12 months after TKA. Of those with preoperative foot pain, 42% at 6 months and 50% at 12 months reported no foot pain after TKA, and the Visual Analog Scale severity reduced from a mean of 4.0 before to 1.7 after surgery. Those with preoperative foot pain had lower baseline KOOS (P = .001), OKS (P = .001), and more depression/anxiety (P = .010), but experienced equivalent postoperative KOOS, OKS, and satisfaction with surgery, compared to those without foot pain.ConclusionFoot or ankle pain was reported by nearly half of TKA subjects, but resolved after surgery in 50%. Those with preoperative foot pain experienced at least equivalent improvement in knee-related symptoms and mobility compared to those without foot pain. The presence of foot pain should not be a deterrent to TKA.