The Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool Is Less Accurate in Extended Length of Stay Patients Following Total Joint Arthroplasty

Background

Although preoperative risk assessment tools have been effective in predicting discharge disposition after total joint arthroplasty (TJA), studies reporting on discharge planning in extended length of stay (ELOS), >3 days, patients are lacking. The purpose of this study was to describe the predictive utility of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT) for discharge disposition in ELOS patients.

Optimal Length of Stay Following Total Joint Arthroplasty to Reduce Readmission Rates

BackgroundLength of stay (LOS) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) continues to decrease. The effects of this trend on readmission risk and total cost are unclear. We hypothesize that optimal LOS following TJA minimizes index hospitalization, early readmission risk, and total cost.MethodsRetrospective data from the South Carolina Department of Revenue and Fiscal Affairs was reviewed for patients who underwent primary TJA in South Carolina from 2000 to 2015 (n = 172,760). Data for readmissions within 90 days were included. Severity of illness was estimated by Elixhauser score (EH). Index LOS is defined as the surgery and the subsequent hospital stay.ResultsPatients with more significant medical comorbidities (EH ≥ 4) had significantly longer LOS than healthier patients (4.0 vs 3.4 days, P < .001). Independent of EH, readmitted patients had a significantly longer index LOS than those never readmitted (4.3 vs 3.6 days, P < .001). For healthier patients (EH ≤ 3), each additional inpatient day increased readmission risk, while among sicker patients, staying 2 days vs 1 day was protective against readmission risk. Since 2000, the total index cost of TJA has doubled and average cost per inpatient day has tripled, but readmission rates remain essentially unchanged (7.4% to 7.0%).ConclusionIncreased LOS was associated with increased readmission risk. Patients with greater medical comorbidities stay longer to protect against readmission. Optimal LOS after TJA is highly influenced by the patient’s overall health. Despite a 300% increase in TJA daily cost, readmission rate has changed minimally over the last 15 years.     

Length of Stay in Skilled Nursing Facilities Following Total Joint Arthroplasty

Background

The most commonly used postacute care facility after total joint arthroplasty is a skilled nursing facility (SNF). However, little is known regarding the role of physical therapy achievements and insurance status on the decision to discharge from an SNF. In this study, we aim to compare functional outcomes and length of stay (LOS) at an SNF among patients with Medicare vs private health coverage.

Factors Associated With Early Return to Driving Following Total Joint Arthroplasty

BackgroundPatients often ask when they can safely return to driving a car following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Most prior research has relied on driving simulators. Our study sought to learn more about real-world patient experiences in returning to driving after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA).MethodsOur institutional total joint registry was used to identify living patients aged 18-85 who underwent primary TKA or primary THA for a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019. Patients who had undergone multiple TJA operations in 2019 or had a primary mailing address outside of the United States were excluded. Ultimately 2508 eligible TJA patients received a survey by mail.ResultsA total of 1128 of 2508 eligible patients (45%) completed surveys and returned them by mail. After 121 surveys were discarded for incompletion, inconsistency, or limited preoperative driving volume, 1007 patients were included in our study. Among these patients, 99% returned to driving postoperatively, with 23% returning within 2 weeks, and 88% returning within 6 weeks. Factors associated with the odds of a patient returning to driving within 2 weeks included laterality, gender, postoperative confidence, postoperative comfort, and surgeon advice. Ten patients (1%) have been involved in a car accident postoperatively.ConclusionAlmost all patients returned to driving postoperatively without being involved in a car accident. Gender, laterality, patient confidence, and comfort as well as surgeon advice were significantly associated with the odds of a patient returning to driving within 2 weeks postoperatively.     

The Need for an Interpreter Increases Length of Stay and Influences Postoperative Disposition Following Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty

BackgroundMany US patients who undergo total joint arthroplasty have low English proficiency, yet no study has investigated how the need for a translator impacts postoperative outcomes for these patients. We hypothesized that need for an interpreter after total joint arthroplasty would impact discharge disposition and length of stay.MethodsWe performed a retrospective chart review of patients at a single large urban academic institution undergoing single primary total joint replacement from July 2016 to November 2019. Patients were classified as primarily English speaking (E), non-English primary language and did not require an interpreter (NE-N), or non-English primary language and did require an interpreter (NE-I). Data on patient characteristics, length of stay, and discharge disposition were collected.ResultsTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) patients in the NE-I group had significantly longer length of stay than both the NE-N group (2.85 vs 2.28 days, P = .015) and the E group (2.85 s vs 1.87 days, P < .0001). THA patients who required a translator were also significantly less likely to be discharged to home than those who were primarily English speaking (71.4% vs 88.8%, P < .0001). Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients in the NE-I group had significantly longer length of stay than the E group (2.66 vs 2.50 days, P = .009). The TKA patients in the NE-I group were significantly less likely to be discharged home than in the E group (74.5% vs 82.4%, P < .0001).ConclusionAlthough interpreter services are provided by the hospital for NE-I patients, the communication barrier that exists affects both length of stay and discharge disposition for both THA and TKA.     

Risk Factors for Greater Than 24-Hour Length of Stay After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundRecently, the Center for Medicare Services removed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from the inpatient-only procedure list. The purpose of this study is to assess the role of demographics, medical comorbidities, and postsurgical complications in predicting safe discharge to home within 24 hours after TKA.MethodsPatients undergoing primary TKA between 2011 and 2016 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Patients were grouped into those whose length of stay (LOS) was less than 24 hours after surgery vs those greater than 24 hours. Demographics, preoperative comorbidities, operative variables, and postoperative adverse events were studied as risk factors for LOS greater than 24 hours.ResultsA total of 210,075 patients undergoing primary TKA met the inclusion criteria, and of those, 18,134 (8.6%) patients were discharged within 24 hours postoperatively. In a risk-adjusted multivariate analysis, patients with increasing age, obesity, preoperative comorbidities of smoking, diabetes, dyspnea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, bleeding disorder, corticosteroid use preoperatively, and dependent functional status conferred a greater risk for discharge greater than 24 hours. Male gender, spinal anesthesia, and monitored anesthesia care were protective against LOS greater than 24 hours.ConclusionThis study suggests that dependent functional status, preoperative comorbidities, and postoperative complications are all associated with a LOS greater than 24 hours after TKA. Surgeons and patients should be aware of the clinical and demographic variables associated with risk for LOS greater than 24 hours when considering outpatient status for patients undergoing TKA.     

Early and Direct Rehab Transfer Leads to Significant Cost Savings and Decreased Hospital Length of Stay for Total Joint Arthroplasty in a Veteran Population

BackgroundTotal joint arthroplasty is the most common elective orthopedic procedure in the Veterans Affairs hospital system. In 2019, physical medicine and rehabilitation began screening patients before surgery to select candidates for direct transfer to acute rehab after surgery. The primary outcome of this study was to demonstrate that the accelerated program was successful in decreasing inpatient costs and length of stay (LOS). The secondary outcome was to show that there was no increase in complication, reoperation, and readmission rates.MethodsA retrospective review of total joint arthroplasty patients was conducted with three cohorts: 1) control (n = 193), 2) transfer to rehab orders on postop day #1 (n = 178), and 3) direct transfers to rehab (n = 173). To assess for demographic disparities between cohorts, multiple analysis of variance tests followed by a Bonferroni P-value correction were used. Differences between test groups regarding primary outcomes were assessed with analysis of variance tests followed by pairwise t-tests with Bonferroni P-value corrections.ResultsThere were no significant differences between the cohort demographics or comorbidities. The mean total LOS decreased from 7.0 days in the first cohort, to 6.9 in the second, and 6.0 in the third (P = .00034). The mean decrease in cost per patient was $14,006 between cohorts 1 and 3, equating to over $5.6 million in savings annually. There was no significant change in preintervention and postintervention short-term complications (P = .295).ConclusionsSignificant cost savings and decrease in total LOS was observed. In the current health care climate focused on value-based care, a similar intervention could be applied nationwide to improve Veterans Affair services.     

A Validated Pre-operative Risk Prediction Tool for Extended Inpatient Length of Stay Following Primary Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundAs value-based reimbursement models mature, understanding the potential trade-off between inpatient lengths of stay and complications or need for costly postacute care becomes more pressing. Understanding and predicting a patient’s expected baseline length of stay may help providers understand how best to decide optimal discharge timing for high-risk total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients.MethodsA retrospective review was conducted of 37,406 primary total hip (17,134, 46%) and knee (20,272, 54%) arthroplasties performed at two high-volume, geographically diverse, tertiary health systems during the study period. Patients were stratified by 3 binary outcomes for extended inpatient length of stay: 72 + hours (29%), 4 + days (11%), or 5 + days (5%). The predictive ability of over 50 sociodemographic/comorbidity variables was tested. Multivariable logistic regression models were created using institution #1 (derivation), with accuracy tested using the cohort from institution #2 (validation).ResultsDuring the study period, patients underwent an extended length of stay with a decreasing frequency over time, with privately insured patients having a significantly shorter length of stay relative to those with Medicare (1.9 versus 2.3 days, P < .0001). Extended stay patients also had significantly higher 90-day readmission rates (P < .0001), even when excluding those discharged to postacute care (P < .01). Multivariable logistic regression models created from the training cohort demonstrated excellent accuracy (area under the curve (AUC): 0.755, 0.783, 0.810) and performed well under external validation (AUC: 0.719, 0.743, 0.763). Many important variables were common to all 3 models, including age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, body mass index, marital status, bilateral case, insurance type, and 13 comorbidities.DiscussionAn online, freely available, preoperative clinical decision tool accurately predicts risk of extended inpatient length of stay after TJA. Many risk factors are potentially modifiable, and these validated tools may help guide clinicians in preoperative patient counseling, medical optimization, and understanding optimal discharge timing.     

The Association Between Hospital Length of Stay and 90-Day Readmission Risk Within a Total Joint Arthroplasty Bundled Payment Initiative

Background

To curb the unsustainable rise in health care expenses, health care payers are developing programs to incentivize hospitals and physicians to improve the value of care delivered to patients. Payers are utilizing various metrics, such as length of stay (LOS) and unplanned readmissions, to track progression of quality metrics. Relevant to orthopedic surgeons, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services announced in 2015 the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Payment Model—a program aimed at improving the quality of health care delivered to patients by shifting more of the financial risk of patient care onto providers.

The Evaluation of Comorbidities Relative to Length of Stay for Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients

Background

The ability to identify those at risk for longer inpatient stay helps providers with postoperative planning and patient expectations. Decreasing length of stay (LOS) in the future will be determined by appropriate patient selection, risk stratification, and preoperative patient optimization. The purpose of this study was to identify factors that place patients at risk for extended postoperative LOSs.

Documented and Undocumented Psychiatric Conditions Affect the Length of Stay and Discharge Disposition Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundDespite increased efforts toward patient optimization, some patients have undocumented conditions that can affect costs and quality metrics for institutions and physicians. This study evaluates the effect of documented and undocumented psychiatric conditions on length of stay (LOS) and discharge disposition following total hip arthroplasty (THA).MethodsA retrospective review of all primary THAs from 2015 to 2020 at a high-volume academic orthopedic specialty hospital was conducted. Patients were separated into 3 cohorts: patients with a documented psychiatric diagnosis (+Dx), patients without a documented psychiatric diagnosis but with an actively prescribed psychiatric medication (?Dx), and patients without a psychiatric diagnosis or medication (control). Patient demographics, LOS, and discharge disposition were assessed.ResultsA total of 5309 patients were included; 3048 patients had no recorded psychiatric medications (control); 2261 patients took at least 1 psychiatric medication, of which 1513 (65.9%) and 748 (34.1%) patients were put in the ?Dx and +Dx cohorts, respectively. American Society of Anesthesiologists class differed between groups (P < .001). The ?Dx and +Dx groups had increased LOS (3.15 ± 2.37 [75.6 ± 56.9] and 3.12 ± 2.27 [74.9 ± 54.5] vs 2.42 ± 1.70 [57.6 ± 40.8] days (hours), P < .001) and were more likely to be discharged to a secondary facility (23.0% and 21.7% vs 13.8%, P < .001) than the control group. Outcomes did not significantly differ between the ?Dx and +Dx cohorts.ConclusionMost THA patients’ psychiatric diagnoses were not documented. The presence of psychiatric medications was associated with longer LOS and a greater likelihood of discharge to secondary facilities. This has implications for both cost and quality metrics. Review of medications can help identify and optimize these patients before surgery.Level III EvidenceRetrospective Cohort Study.     

Infection Rate Following Total Joint Arthroplasty in the HIV Population

The purpose of this study is to review a large series of HIV-infected patients who underwent total joint arthroplasty and identify potential risk-factors for infection. Sixty-nine HIV-infected arthroplasty cases were analyzed with 138 matched controls. Deep infection rate following total hip or knee arthroplasty was 4.4% (3 of 69) among HIV cases compared to 0.72% (1 of 138) among controls, yielding a non-significant 6.22 times increased odds of infection (95% CI 0.64–61.0, P = 0.11). Kaplan–Meier survival curves for infection free survival and revision free survival revealed non-significantly decreased survival in HIV cases compared to controls (P = 0.06 and P = 0.09). Our results suggest that the rate of early joint infection following primary total joint arthroplasty in the HIV-infected population is lower than reported in a number of previously published studies.     

Hospital Discharge Within 1 Day After Total Joint Arthroplasty From a Veterans Affairs Hospital Does Not Increase Complication and Readmission Rates

Background

Attempts to control costs associated with total joint arthroplasty have included efforts to shorten hospital length of stay (LOS). Concerns related to patient outcomes and safety with decreased LOS persist. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether discharge on postoperative day (POD) 1 after joint replacement is associated with increased rates of 90-day return to the operating room, and 30-day readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits.

Preoperative Patient Factors Affecting Length of Stay following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BackgroundTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) yields substantial improvements in quality of life for patients with severe osteoarthritis. Previous research has shown that TKA outcomes are inferior in patients with certain demographic and clinical factors. Length of stay (LOS) following TKA is a major component of costs incurred by healthcare providers. It is hypothesized that patient-related factors may influence LOS following TKA. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate these factors.MethodsThree databases (PubMed, Embase, and OVID Medline) were searched using variants of the terms “total knee arthroplasty” and “length of stay”. Studies were screened and data abstracted in duplicate. The primary outcome was the effect of prognostic variables on LOS following TKA. Meta-analysis was performed using the Review Manager (RevMan) software (version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Center, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014).ResultsA total of 68 studies met all inclusion criteria for this review. These studies comprised 21,494,459 patients undergoing TKA with mean age 66.82 years (range, 15-95 years) and 63.8% (12,165,160 of 19,060,572 reported) females. The mean MINORS score was 7, suggesting that studies had a low quality of evidence. Mean LOS following TKA has steadily decreased over the past 4 decades, partially because of the implementation of fast-track programs. Demographic factors associated with increased LOS were age >70 years (mean difference [MD] = 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.38-1.24), female gender (MD = 0.32; 95% CI = 0.29-0.48), body mass index >30 (MD = 0.09; 95% CI = 0.01-0.16), and non-White race (MD = 0.20; 95% CI = 0.10-0.29). Clinical factors associated with increased LOS were American Society of Anesthesiologists score 3-4 vs 1-2 (MD = 1.12; 95% CI = 0.58 to 1.66), Charlson Comorbidity Index > 0 vs 0 (MD = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.32 to 1.22), and preoperative hemoglobin < 130 g/L (MD = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.34 to 0.98).ConclusionThis systematic review and meta-analysis showed that increased age, female gender, body mass index ≥ 30, non-White race, American Society of Anesthesiologists > 2, Charlson Comorbidity Index > 0, and preoperative hemoglobin < 130 g/L were predictors of increased LOS. Mean LOS has steadily decreased over the past decades with the implementation of perioperative “fast-track” programs. Future research should investigate the benefits of preoperative risk factor modification on LOS, in addition to novel surgical approaches, anesthetic adjuvants, and physiotherapy modifications.Level of EvidenceIV, systematic review, and meta-analysis of level III and IV evidence.     

Changes in Patient Satisfaction Following Total Joint Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe primary aim is to identify the degree to which patient satisfaction with the outcome of total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) changes between 1 and 3 years from the procedure. The secondary aim is to identify variables associated with satisfaction.MethodsData were sourced from 2 prospective international, multicenter studies (919 THA and 450 TKA patients). Satisfaction was assessed by a 10-point numerical rating scale, at 1- and 3-year follow-up. Linear mixed-effects models were used to assess factors associated with satisfaction.ResultsFor the THA cohort, higher preoperative joint space width (odds ratio [OR] = 0.28; P = .004), pain from other joints (OR = 0.26; P = .033), and lower preoperative health state (OR = −0.02; P < .001) were associated with consistently lower levels of satisfaction. The model also showed that patients with preoperative anxiety/depression improved in satisfaction between 1 and 3 years (OR = −0.26; P = .031).For the TKA cohort, anterior (vs neutral or posterior) tibial component slope (OR = 0.90; P = .008), greater femoral component valgus angle (OR = 0.05; P = .012), less severe osteoarthritis (OR = −0.10; P < .001), and lower preoperative health state (OR = −0.02; P = .003) were associated with lower levels of satisfaction across the study period. In addition, patients with anterior tibial component slope improved in satisfaction level over time (OR = −0.33; P = .022).ConclusionChanges in satisfaction following THA and TKA are rare between 1- and 3-year follow-up. The findings of this study can be used to guide patient counseling preoperatively and to determine intervals of routine follow-up postoperatively.     

Fall Risk Score at the Time of Discharge Predicts Readmission Following Total Joint Arthroplasty

Background

Readmission among Medicare recipients is a leading driver of healthcare expenditure. To date, most predictive tools are too coarse for direct clinical application. Our objective in this study is to determine if a pre-existing tool to identify patients at increased risk for inpatient falls, the Hendrich Fall Risk Score, could be used to accurately identify Medicare patients at increased risk for readmission following arthroplasty, regardless of whether the readmission was due to a fall.

Predictive Risk Factors for 30-day Readmissions Following Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty and Modification of Patient Management

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid have begun to publically publish statistics on readmissions following primary total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Our study retrospectively assesses 30-day readmissions rates following THA and TKA, performed by a single surgeon at a tertiary care medical center between 2007 and 2012. Results of a univariate analysis and logistic regression model indicated female gender, high ASA class, and increased operative time to be significantly associated with higher rates of readmission (OR 4.646, OR 1.257, and OR 5.323, respectively). Readmissions most often occurred within the first week of patient discharge. Surgical complications and gastrointestinal discomfort were the most common causes for readmission. Using readmission risk we can stratify patients into tiered critical care pathways to reduce readmissions.     

A Comparison of Hospital Length of Stay and Short-term Morbidity Between the Anterior and the Posterior Approaches to Total Hip Arthroplasty

The efficacy of the anterior, relative to other operative approaches, in promoting earlier return to function after hip arthroplasty has not been well established. We retrospectively compared 41 anterior and 47 posterior approach cases. Mean hospital stay (2.9 vs. 4 days, p = 0.001) and days to mobilization (2.4 vs. 3.2 days, p = 0.006) were shorter with the anterior approach. After multivariate regression, the anterior approach remained a significant predictor of early discharge (p = 0.009). Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve neuropraxia (17%) and fracture (2%), were more common in the anterior cohort, but all patients recovered without sequela. Overall, the anterior approach patients had earlier discharge and mobilization as compared to patients who received the posterior approach. Neuropraxia and fracture remain a concern, but the clinical significance was low in our cohort.