Risk of Prosthetic Joint Infection Increases Following Early Aseptic Revision Surgery of Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundIt is important to identify risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total joint arthroplasty in order to mitigate the substantial social and economic burden. The objective of this study is to evaluate early aseptic revision surgery as a potential risk factor for PJI following total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsPatients who underwent primary THA or TKA with early aseptic revision were identified in 2 national insurance databases. Control groups of patients who did not undergo revision were identified and matched 10:1 to study patients. Rates of PJI at 1 and 2 years postoperatively following revision surgery were calculated and compared to controls using a logistic regression analysis.ResultsIn total, 328 Medicare and 222 Humana patients undergoing aseptic revision THA within 1 year of index THA were found to have significantly increased risk of PJI at 1 year (5.49% vs 0.91%, odds ratio [OR] 5.61, P < .001 for Medicare; 7.21% vs 0.68%, OR 11.34, P < .001 for Humana) and 2 years (5.79% vs 1.10%, OR 4.79, P < .001 for Medicare; 8.11% vs 1.04%, OR 9.05, P < .001 for Humana). Similarly for TKA, 190 Medicare and 226 Humana patients who underwent aseptic revision TKA within 1 year were found to have significantly higher rates of PJI at 1 year (6.48% vs 1.16%, OR 7.69, P < .001 for Medicare; 6.19% vs 1.28%, OR 4.89, P < .001 for Humana) and 2 years (8.42% vs 1.58%, OR 6.57, P < .001 for Medicare; 7.08% vs 1.50%, OR 4.50, P < .001 for Humana).ConclusionEarly aseptic revision surgery following THA and TKA is associated with significantly increased risks of subsequent PJI within 2 years.     

Prior Knee Arthroscopy Is Associated With Increased Risk of Revision After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundKnee arthroscopy (KA) is frequently performed to provide improved joint function and pain relief. However, outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after prior KA are not fully understood. The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between prior KA within 2 years of TKA on revision rates after TKA.MethodsData were collected from the Humana insurance database using the PearlDiver Patient Records Database from 2006 to 2017. Subjects were identified using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases procedure codes to identify primary TKA. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based upon a history of prior KA. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine association between KA and outcomes at 2-year postoperative period.ResultsIn total, 138,019 patients were included in this study, with 3357 (2.4%) patients receiving a KA before TKA and 134,662 (97.6%) patients who did not. The most common reason for KA was osteoarthritis (40.0%), followed by medial tear of the meniscus (26.0%) and chondromalacia (21%.0). After adjustment, prior KA was associated with increased revision rate (odds ratio [OR], 1.392; P = .003), postoperative stiffness (OR, 1.251; P = .012), periprosthetic joint infection (OR, 1.326; P < .001), and aseptic loosening (OR, 1.401; P = .048).ConclusionPrior KA is significantly associated with increased 2-year TKA revision rate. The most common etiology for arthroscopy was osteoarthritis. The results of the study, showing that arthroscopy before TKA substantially increases the rates of revision, PJI, aseptic loosening, and stiffness, lend further credence to the idea that patients may be better served by nonsurgical management of their degenerative pathology until they become candidates for TKA. Subjecting this population to arthroscopy appears to offer limited benefit at the cost of poorer outcomes when they require arthroplasty in the future.Level of EvidenceLevel III therapeutic study.     

Advanced Age Is Not a Barrier to Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Detailed Analysis of Outcomes and Complications in an Elderly Cohort Compared With Average Age Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients

BackgroundLife expectancy and higher complication rates have made the routine use of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in elderly patients disputed by some authors. The purpose of this study was to assess patient and implant survivorship, complication and revision rates, and patient-reported outcomes (PROMS) in a cohort of patients aged above 80 years undergoing TKA. A comparison with a propensity matched cohort of patients of average age within our database for TKA was performed.MethodsA retrospective review of prospectively collected data identified 644 patients over the age of 80 years undergoing a TKA within a 14-year period. After calculating the average age of all TKA patients within the reviewed database, a cohort deemed average age was created within 1 standard deviation of the average age and matched using the following criteria: gender, surgeon, diagnosis, procedure type, and year. The primary outcomes were survivorship of the implant and the patient. The secondary outcomes were complications, transfusion rates, discharge destination, and PROMS.ResultsThe revision rate was low for both groups (P = .051). Implant survivorship at 10 years was similar (P = .07). Mortality rate was higher in the elderly (P < .001). General complication rate was higher in the elderly (P = .031). Surgical complications rates were similar (P = .702). The PROMS at final follow-up were 4% lower in the elderly (P < .001).ConclusionTKA in the elderly is a safe procedure. With measures minimizing the perioperative complications and blood loss, the outcome can be expected to be similar to patients of average age. The projected implant and patient survivorship in the elderly cohort is long enough to suggest that TKA in the elderly could have a high impact on remaining quality of life.Level III retrospective study.     

Increased Revisions in Conversion Total Knee Arthroplasty After Periarticular Open Reduction Internal Fixation Compared With Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Analysis

BackgroundPrior studies on conversion total knee arthroplasty (cTKA) have reported increased technical challenges and risk of complications compared with primary knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare two-year postoperative complication/revision rates between patients undergoing cTKA after prior periarticular open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and those undergoing primary TKA.MethodsPatients who underwent cTKA after prior periarticular ORIF of the ipsilateral knee were identified in a national all-payer claims database from 2010 to 2018. This ORIF-cTKA cohort was propensity matched to participants undergoing primary TKA based on age, gender, Charlson comorbidity index, and obesity status. Univariate analysis was performed to analyze differences in two-year complication and revision rates.ResultsAfter propensity matching, 823 patients were included in the ORIF-cTKA cohort and 1640 patients in the primary TKA cohort. No differences in demographics or comorbidities existed between cohorts. Relative to the primary TKA cohort, the ORIF-cTKA cohort had significantly higher incidences of all-cause revision (5.47% vs 2.47%, P = .001), periprosthetic joint infection (PJI; 4.74% vs 1.34%, P < .001), and intraoperative or postoperative periprosthetic fracture (1.58% vs 0.55%, P = .01) at two years postoperatively. There was also a nonsignificant trend toward increased rates of aseptic loosening (1.82% vs 0.91%, P = .052) in the ORIF-cTKA.ConclusionRelative to primary TKA, cTKA after periarticular ORIF is associated with significantly increased rates of all-cause revision, PJI, and periprosthetic fracture at two years postoperatively. Surgeons should counsel these patients about the increased risks of these postoperative complications and consider treating them as high risk for PJI in the perioperative period.     

Manipulation Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty is Associated With Increased Rates of Infection and Revision

BackgroundStiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a disabling complication and manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is often performed as an early intervention. Few studies have focused on the revision risk, infection risk, demographics, and clinical outcomes in Medicare patients undergoing MUA following primary TKA.MethodsWe reviewed 142,440 patients who had primary TKA from a national database and identified 3,652 patients (2.6%) who underwent MUA. Patient demographics and comorbid conditions were evaluated to identify risk factors. Incidence of revision and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) at 1-, 2-, and 5-year time points in a cohort of MUA patients was compared to patients who did not undergo MUA. Multivariate Cox regressions were used for statistical analyses.ResultsThe incidence of MUA was higher in Black versus White individuals (4.1 versus 2.5%, P < .001). Revision risk was significantly greater in the MUA group at 1-, 2-, and 5-year time points with a hazard ratio (HR) of, 3.81, 3.90, and 3.22 respectively, P < .001. One- and 2-year revision risk was significantly greater when MUA occurred at 6 to 12 months post-TKA when compared to <3 months, P < .05. Risk of PJI was significantly greater in the MUA group with a HR of 2.2, 2.2, and 2.1 at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively P < .001.ConclusionThe incidence of MUA was 2.6%. There was an increased incidence of revision surgery and PJI in patients undergoing MUA. Patients at increased risk for stiffness following TKA should be closely monitored and treated with early intervention to minimize risk of poor outcomes.     

More Patients Are Being Discharged Home After Total Knee Arthroplasty,However Rates Vary Between Large Databases

BackgroundThere have been significant advancements in perioperative care for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is essential to quantify the impact of efforts to better optimize patients and deliver care. The purpose of this study is to assess trends in discharge destination, length of stay (LOS), and complications.MethodsPatients undergoing primary TKA were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) and Humana claims databases using procedural codes. Patients were classified as being discharged home or not home (skilled nursing facility, acute rehab, other non-home destinations). Changes in discharge destination, LOS, comorbidity burden, readmissions, and reoperation were assessed.ResultsIn total, 254,195 ACS NSQIP patients underwent TKA, with an increase in home discharge from 67.2% in 2011 to 85.3% in 2017 (P < .0001). There were 178,071 TKA patients in the Humana database and home discharge increased from 62.1% in 2007 to 74.7% in 2016 (P < .0001). LOS decreased and proportion of patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3 or Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 increased significantly for both home and non-home going patients. Home going patients had a decrease in 30-day readmissions (ACS NSQIP: 2011: 3.6%, 2017: 2.7%, P = .001; Humana: 2007: 4.0%, 2016: 2.4%, P < .0001).ConclusionPatients undergoing TKA were discharged home more often, had shorter LOS, and had significantly lower readmission rates, despite an increasingly comorbid patient population. It is likely that these improvements in postoperative care have resulted in significant cost savings, for both payers and hospitals. The efforts necessary to create and maintain such improvements, as well as the source of data, should be considered when changes to reimbursement are being evaluated. The metrics studied in this paper should provide a comparison for further improvement with continued transition to bundle payments and transition to outpatient surgery with removal of TKA from the inpatient-only list.     

Knee Arthroscopy After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Not a Benign Procedure

BackgroundOutcomes of knee arthroscopy (KA) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been limited to small case series with short-term follow-up. The purpose of this study is to report the outcomes of patients who undergo a KA after a TKA using a large longitudinal database.MethodsThe PearlDiver Medicare database was queried for patients who underwent a KA procedure after a TKA on the ipsilateral extremity. A randomly selected control group was created by matching controls to cases in a 3:1 ratio based on age, gender, year of procedure, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Revision for infection and all-cause revision were used as end points.ResultsA total of192 TKA patients who underwent a subsequent KA (TKA + KA group) were compared to 571 TKA patients who did not have a subsequent KA (TKA − KA group). The incidence of revision for infection was 6.3% in the TKA + KA group compared to 2.2% in the TKA − KA group (odds ratio, 2.87; P = .009). The incidence of all-cause revision was 18.8% in the TKA + KA group compared to 5.1% in the TKA − KA group (odds ratio, 4.34; P < .001).ConclusionKA after TKA was associated with increased infection-related and all-cause revision. The association between KA and subsequent infection requires further investigation.     

Migration Patterns for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States as Reported in the American Joint Replacement Registry

BackgroundRevision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with a higher complication rate and a greater cost when compared to primary TKA. Based on patient choice, referral, or patient transfers, revision TKAs are often performed in different institutions by different surgeons than the primary TKA. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of hospital size, teaching status, and revision indication on the migration patterns of failed primary TKA in patients 65 years of age and older.MethodsAll primary and revision TKAs reported to the American Joint Replacement Registry from January 2012 through March 2020 were included and merged with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services database. Migration was defined as a patient having a primary TKA and revision TKA performed at separate institutions by different surgeons.ResultsIn total, 9167 linked primary and revision TKAs were included in the analysis. Overall migration rates were significantly higher from small (<100 beds; P = .019), non-teaching institutions (P = .002) driven primarily by patients diagnosed with infection. Infection patients had significantly higher migration rates from small (46.8%, P < .001), non-teaching (43.5%, P < .001) institutions, while migration rates for other causes of revision were statistically similar. Most patients migrated to medium or large institutions (84.7%) for revision TKA rather than small institutions (15.3%, P < .001) and to teaching (78.3%) rather than non-teaching institutions (21.7%, P < .001).ConclusionThere is a diagnosis-dependent referral bias that affects the migration rates of infected primary TKA from small non-teaching institutions leading to a flow of more medically complex patients to medium and large teaching institutions for infected revision TKA.     

Perioperative Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Non-English Speakers

BackgroundMany studies have demonstrated that in patients whose primary language is not English, outcomes after an orthopaedic surgery are worse compared to primary English speakers. The goal of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) who prefer English as their first language versus those who prefer a different language.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent primary TKA from May 2012 to July 2021. Patients were separated into two groups based on whether English was their preferred primary language (PPL). Of the 13,447 patients who underwent primary TKA, 11,290 reported English as their PPL, and 2,157 preferred a language other than English. Patients whose PPL was not English were further stratified based on whether they requested interpreter services. Multiple regression analyses were performed to determine the significance of perioperative outcomes while controlling for demographic differences.ResultsOur analysis found that non-English PPL patients had significantly lower rates of readmission (P = .040), overall revision (P = .028), and manipulation under anesthesia (MUA; P = .025) within 90 days postoperatively. Sub analyses of the non-English PPL group showed that those who requested interpreter services had significantly lower 1-year revision (P < .001) and overall MUA (P = .049) rates.ConclusionOur results demonstrate that TKA patients who communicated in English without an interpreter were significantly more likely to undergo revision, readmission, and MUA. These findings may suggest that language barriers may make it more difficult to identify postoperative problems or concerns in non-English speakers, which may limit appropriate postoperative care.Level III EvidenceRetrospective Cohort Study.     

Effects of the Obesity Epidemic on Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Demographics

BackgroundHigher body mass index (BMI) is a well-known risk factor for the development of hip and knee osteoarthritis and predicts total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at an earlier age. The purpose of this study is to document the nationwide trends in age and obesity in primary THA and TKA throughout the obesity epidemic.MethodsA retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample database was conducted on patients undergoing primary THA and TKA for primary OA between 2002 and 2017. Analysis of variance and chi-square tests were performed to examine changes in age and obesity percentage over time, respectively. Pearson correlations were used to assess the relationship between patient age, BMI, and year of surgery.ResultsA total of 688,371 THA and 1,556,651 TKA were identified over the sixteen-year period. Between 2002 and 2017, the proportion of obese patients increased for both THA (7.0% to 22.7%, P < .001) and TKA (10.7% to 30.4%, P < .001). Mean age significantly decreased for both THA (66.7 to 65.9 years, P < .001) and TKA (67.6 to 66.8 years; P < .001). Over time, BMI significantly increased (THA: r = 0.221 vs. TKA: r = 0.272) and patient age decreased (THA: r = -0.031 vs. TKA: r = -0.137) for both procedures (P < .001 for all).ConclusionTHA and TKA patients have become younger and increasingly more obese throughout the obesity epidemic, as obesity rates have tripled over this time period. The current investigation is the first to demonstrate significant trends in both age and obesity in the THA and TKA populations on a national level.Level of EvidenceIII.     

The Cost of Stiffness After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundStiffness after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is debilitating and poorly understood. A heterogenous approach to the treatment is often utilized, including both nonoperative and operative treatment modalities. The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of treatments used between stiff and non-stiff TKA groups and their financial impact.MethodsAn observational cohort study was conducted using a large database. A total of 12,942 patients who underwent unilateral primary TKA from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017, were included. Stiffness after TKA was defined as manipulation under anesthesia and a diagnosis code of stiffness or ankylosis, and subsequent diagnosis and procedure codes were used to identify the prevalence and financial impact of multiple common treatment options.ResultsThe prevalence of stiffness after TKA was 6.1%. Stiff patients were more likely to undergo physical therapy, medication, bracing, alternative treatment, clinic visits, and reoperation. Revision surgery was the most common reoperation in the stiff TKA group (7.6%). The incidence of both arthroscopy and revision surgery were higher in the stiff TKA population. Dual component revisions were costlier for patients who had stiff TKAs ($65,771 versus $48,287; P < .05). On average, patients who had stiffness after TKA endured costs from 1.5 to 7.5 times higher than the cost of their non-stiff counterparts during the 2 years following index TKA.ConclusionPatients who have stiffness after primary TKA face significantly higher treatment costs for both operative and nonoperative treatments than patients who do not have stiffness.     

Surgical Helmet Systems Are Associated With a Lower Rate of Prosthetic Joint Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Combined Results From the New Zealand Joint Registry and Surgical Site Infection Improvement Programme

BackgroundThis study aimed to identify the risk factors, in particular the use of surgical helmet systems (SHSs), for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Data recorded by the New Zealand Surgical Site Infection Improvement Programme (SSIIP) and the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) were combined and analyzed.MethodsPrimary TKA procedures performed between July 2013 and June 2018 that were recorded by both the SSIIP and NZJR were analyzed. Two primary outcomes were measured: (1) PJI within 90 days as recorded by the SSIIP and (2) revision TKA for deep infection within 6 months as recorded by the NZJR. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for both outcomes with results considered significant at P < .05.ResultsA total of 19,322 primary TKAs were recorded by both databases in which 97 patients had a PJI within 90 days as recorded by the SSIIP (0.50%), and 90 patients had a revision TKA for deep infection within 6 months (0.47%) as recorded by the NZJR. An SHS was associated with a lower rate of PJI (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.50, P = .008) and revision for deep infection (adjusted OR = 0.55, P = .022) than conventional gowning. Male sex (adjusted OR = 2.6, P < .001) and an American Society of Anesthesiologists score >2 were patient risk factors for infection (OR = 2.63, P < .001 for PJI and OR = 1.75, P = .017 for revision for deep infection).ConclusionUsing contemporary data from the SSIIP and NZJR, the use of the SHS was associated with a lower rate of PJI after primary TKA than conventional surgical gowning. Male sex and a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score continue to be risk factors for infection.     

Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in Young Patients: Higher Early Reoperation and Rerevision

BackgroundRevision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) rates are increasing in younger patients. Few studies have assessed outcomes of initial aseptic rTKA performed for younger patients compared with traditional-aged patients.MethodsA detailed medical record review was performed to identify patient demographics, medical comorbidities, surgical rTKA indications, timing from index TKA to rTKA, subsequent reoperation rates, component rerevision rates, and salvage procedures for 147 young patients (158 knees) aged 55 years and younger and for a traditional older cohort of 276 patients (300 knees) between 60 and 75 years. Univariate analysis was performed to assess differences in these primary variables, and a log-rank test was used to estimate 5-year implant survival based on either reoperation or component revision and salvage procedures.ResultsYounger TKA patients were more likely to undergo initial aseptic rTKA within 2 years of their primary TKA (52.5% vs 29.0%, P < .001) and were more likely to undergo early reoperation (17.7% vs 9.7%, P = .02) or component rerevision (11.4% vs 6.0%, P < .05) after rTKA. Infection and extensor mechanism complications were more commonly noted in younger patients. Estimated 5-year survival was also lower for both reoperation (59.4% vs 65.7%, P = .02) and component rerevision or salvage (65.8% vs 80.1%, P = .02).ConclusionEarly reoperation and component re-rTKA were performed nearly twice as often in younger rTKA than traditional-aged TKA patients. Care should be given to reduce perioperative infection and extensor mechanism failures after rTKA in younger patients.     

High Mortality After Total Knee Arthroplasty Periprosthetic Joint Infection is Related to Preoperative Morbidity and the Disease Process but Not Treatment

BackgroundPeriprosthetic joint infection (PJI) mortality rate is approximately 20%. The etiology for high mortality remains unknown. The objective of this study was to determine whether mortality was associated with preoperative morbidity (frailty), sequalae of treatment, or the PJI disease process itself.MethodsA multicenter observational study was completed comparing 184 patients treated with septic revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to a control group of 38 patients treated with aseptic revision TKA. Primary outcomes included time and the cause of death. Secondary outcomes included preoperative comorbidities and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCMI) measured preoperatively and at various postoperative timepoints.ResultsThe septic revision TKA cohort experienced earlier mortality compared to the aseptic cohort, with a higher mortality rate at 90 days, 1, 2, and 3 years after index revision surgery (P = .01). There was no significant difference for any single cause of death (P > .05 for each). The mean preoperative CCMI was higher (P = .005) in the septic revision TKA cohort. Both septic and aseptic cohorts experienced a significant increase in CCMI from the preoperative to 3 years postoperative (P < .0001 and P = .002) and time of death (P < .0001 both) timepoints. The septic revision TKA cohort had a higher CCMI 3 years postoperatively (P = .001) and at time of death (P = .046), but not one year postoperatively (P = .119).ConclusionCompared to mortality from aseptic revision surgery, septic revision TKA is associated with earlier mortality, but there is no single specific etiology. As quantified by changes in CCMI, PJI mortality was associated with both frailty and the PJI disease process, but not treatment.     

Weight Gain After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With Accelerated Time to Revision for Aseptic Loosening

BackgroundObesity is a major health problem worldwide and is associated with complications after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It remains unknown whether a change in body mass index (BMI) after primary TKA affects the reasons for revision TKA or the time to revision TKA.MethodsA total of 160 primary TKAs referred to an academic tertiary center for revision TKA were retrospectively stratified according to change in BMI from the time of their primary TKA to revision TKA. The association between change in BMI and time to revision was also analyzed according to indication for revision of TKA using Pearson's chi-square test.ResultsThe mean change in BMI from primary to revision TKA was 0.82 ± 3.5 kg/m². Maintaining a stable weight after primary TKA was protective against late revision TKA for any reason (P = .004). Patients who failed to reduce their BMI were revised for aseptic loosening earlier, at less than 5 years (P = .020), whereas those who reduced their BMI were revised later, at over 10 years (P = .004).ConclusionMaintaining weight after primary TKA is protective against later revision TKA for any reason but failure to reduce weight after primary TKA is a risk factor for early revision TKA for aseptic loosening and osteolysis. Orthopedic surgeons should recommend against weight gain after primary TKA to reduce the risk of an earlier revision TKA in the event that a revision TKA is indicated.     

Minimal Incision Surgery as a Risk Factor for Early Failure of Total Knee Arthroplasty

A consecutive series of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed at 3 centers by 5 surgeons for a 3-year period was reviewed. Revisions performed for infection and rerevisions were excluded. Review of clinical and radiographic data determined incision type, sex, age, time to revision, and primary diagnosis at time of revision. Two-hundred thirty-seven first-time revision TKAs were performed, of which 44 (18.6%) had been a minimal incision surgery (MIS) primary TKA and 193 (81.4%) had been a standard primary TKA. Patients with MIS were younger (62.1 vs 66.2 years, P = .02). Most striking was the difference in time to revision, which was significantly shorter for the MIS group (14.8 vs 80 months, P < .001). Minimal incision surgery TKA accounted for a substantial percentage of revision TKA in recent years at these centers. The high prevalence of MIS failures occurring within 24 months is disturbing and warrants further investigation.     

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intrawound Vancomycin in Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Continued Call for a Prospective Randomized Trial

BackgroundPeriprosthetic joint injection (PJI) is a rare, but life-altering complication of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Though intrawound vancomycin powder (IVP) has been studied in other orthopedic subspecialties, its efficacy and safety in TJA has not been established.MethodsPubMed and MEDLINE databases were used to identify studies utilizing IVP in primary and revision total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA). Postoperative PJI data were pooled using random effect models with results reported as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Studies were weighted by the inverse variance of their effect estimates.ResultsOverall, 16 of the 1871 studies identified were pooled for final analysis, yielding 33,731 patients totally. Of these, 17 164 received IVP. In aggregate, patients who received IVP had a decreased rate of PJI (OR 0.46, P < .05). Separately, TKA and THA patients who received IVP had lower rates of PJI (OR 0.41, P < .05 and OR 0.45, P < .05, respectively). Aggregate analysis of primary TKA and THA patients also revealed a decreased PJI rate (OR 0.44, P < .05). Pooled revision TKA and THA patients had a similar decrease in PJI rates (OR 0.30, P < .05). Although no publication bias was appreciated, these findings are limited by the low-quality evidence available.ConclusionWhile IVP may reduce the risk of PJI in primary and revision TJA, its widespread use cannot be recommended until higher-quality data, such as that obtained from randomized control trials, are available. This study underscores the continued need for more rigorous studies before general adoption of this practice by arthroplasty surgeons.     

Venous Thromboembolic Disease in Revision vs Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

Venous thromboembolic disease (VTED) is a serious complication of primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the incidence and risk of VTED for revision compared with primary TKA cases have not been well-described.